Artículo 1
Artículo 1
Artículo 1
Biomolecular
Chemistry
Cite this: Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 1870
www.rsc.org/obc PAPER
Enantioselective synthesis of the carbocyclic nucleoside (−)-abacavir†
Grant A. Boyle,a Christopher D. Edlin,a Yongfeng Li,b Dennis C. Liotta,b Garreth L. Morgans*a and
Chitalu C. Musondaa
Published on 07 December 2011 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2OB06775G
An enantiopure β-lactam with a suitably disposed electron withdrawing group on nitrogen, participated in
a π-allylpalladium mediated reaction with 2,6-dichloropurine tetrabutylammonium salt to afford an
advanced cis-1,4-substituted cyclopentenoid with both high regio- and stereoselectivity. This advanced
Downloaded by Brown University on 28 June 2012
a
iThemba Pharmaceuticals PTY (Ltd.), PO BOX 21Modderfontein, 1645
Gauteng, South Africa. E-mail: gmorgans@ithembapharma.com;
Fax: +27 (0)11 372-4518; Tel: +27 (0)11 372-4500
b
Emory University, Department of Chemistry, 1521 Dickey Dr Emerson
403, Atlanta, GA, USA, 30322. Tel: 404-727-8130
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Copies of 1H
NMR and 13C NMR spectra of new compounds. See DOI: 10.1039/
c2ob06775g Scheme 1 General approaches to carbocyclic nucleosides.
1870 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 1870–1876 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Online
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 1870–1876 | 1871
View Online
Published on 07 December 2011 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2OB06775G
1872 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 1870–1876 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Online
converted to (−)-Abacavir 2b. Lastly, introduction of the amine D −35.0 (c 0.2 in CHCl3); δH (400 MHz,
CHCl3), lit.,36 [α]25
functional group at the 6-position of the purine base was CDCl3, Me4Si) 2.40–2.50 (m, 1H), 2.65–2.75 (m, 1H),
approached in a more direct manner from 21 using 4-methoxy- 3.75–3.85 (m, 1H), 4.5 (s, 1H), 5.90–5.95 (m, 1H), 6.00–6.05
benzylamine as an ammonia surrogate. This allowed for one less (m, 1H), 6.4 (br s, 1H); δC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 172.5, 136.7,
step as well as avoiding potentially explosive intermediates 130.6, 59.1, 53.0, 30.6
(azide 22) and toxic reagents (SnCl2) en route to (−)-Abacavir
2b.
(1S,5R)-6-Tosyl-6-azabicyclo[3.2.0]hept-3-en-7-one 18d
pounds were carried out in a dry reaction vessel under a positive 165 mmol) were added and the mixture stirred for 2 min to com-
pressure of nitrogen. Analytical thin-layer chromatography was pletely dissolve the solids. 4-Methylbenzenesulfonic anhydride
performed on an aluminium backed plates coated with 0.25 mm (55.0 g, 169 mmol) was added portion wise to the reaction
230–400 mesh silica gel containing a fluorescent indicator. Thin mixture over 5 min. The reaction mixture went to a dark brown
layer chromatography plates were visualized by exposure to red colour and was allowed to warm to room temperature and
ultraviolet light (254 nm) and/or by immersion in basic KMnO4 stirred at ambient temperature for an additional 24 h. The reac-
followed by heating. Organic solutions were concentrated by tion mixture was washed with brine (2 × 100 mL) and water (2 ×
Downloaded by Brown University on 28 June 2012
rotary evaporation at c.a. 30 mmHg. Flash column chromato- 100 mL). The organic extract was dried over sodium sulfate,
graphy was performed on Silica gel 60 (230–400 mesh, ASTM). filtered and evaporated to afford a brown residue. The residue
IR spectra were recorded as neat liquids or KBr pellets and was dissolved into a minimum amount of dichloromethane and
absorptions are reported in cm−1. NMR spectra were measured filtered through a silica gel pad with dichloromethane as the
on a Bruker 400 MHz Avance instrument at 400 MHz for 1H eluent. The washings were monitored by TLC to ensure all the
and 100 MHz for 13C NMR, using tetramethylsilane as an product had eluted. The residue was recrystallized from ethyl
internal reference and CDCl3 or d6-DMSO as a solvent. Chemi- acetate–hexane mixtures to afford 18d (27.0 g, 75%) as a crystal-
cal shift values for protons are reported in parts per million line white solid. mp: 93–95 °C (ethyl acetate–hexane); [α]20 D
( ppm, δ scale) downfield from tetramethylsilane and are refer- −125.3 (c 0.50 in CHCl3); νmax/cm−1 3068, 2921, 1781, 1348,
enced to residual proton of CDCl3 (δ 7.26) or residual protons of 119; δH (400 MHz, CDCl3, Me4Si) 7.86 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H),
d6-DMSO (δ 2.50). Carbon nuclear magnetic resonance spectra 7.34 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.04–6.02 (m, 2H), 5.02–4.99 (m, 1H),
(13C NMR) were recorded at 100 MHz: chemical shifts for 3.85–3.81 (m, 1H), 2.71–2.66 (m, 1H), 2.54–2.45 (m, 1H), 2.44
carbons are reported in parts per million ( ppm, δ scale) (s, 3H); δC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 167.0, 145.0, 138.7, 136.4,
downfield from tetramethylsilane and are referenced to the 129.9, 128.3, 127.3, 66.0, 51.8, 31.0, 21.6; m/z 264.0651 (MH+,
carbon resonance of CDCl3 (δ 77.0) or the carbon resonance of C13H14NO3S requires 264.0694).
d6-DMSO (δ 39.51). Data are presented as follows: chemical Method 2. A solution of 13 (2.00 g, 18.32 mmol) in dry THF
shift, multiplicity (s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = (33 mL) was added drop wise to a stirred mixture of 1.6 M n-
quartet, quint = quintet, sext = sextet, sept = septet, m = multi- BuLi in hexane (19.5 mL, 31.21 mmol) in dry THF (33 mL) at
plet and/or multiplet resonances, br = broad), coupling constant −78 °C under Argon. The mixture was stirred at −78 °C for 1 h
in hertz (Hz), and signal area integration in natural numbers. and p- toluenesulfonyl chloride (4.65 g, 24.40 mmol) was
High resolution mass spectra were measured using a Waters API added. The reaction mixture was gradually warmed to ambient
Q-TOF Ultima instrument. Optical rotations were recorded on a temperature. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, and the
Jasco DIP-370 Polarimeter at 20 °C or 25 °C. residue was purified by flash chromatography (SiO2, hexane–
All reagents were purchased from commercial sources unless ethyl acetate, 4 : 1) to give 18d (2.90 g, 60%) as a white solid.
otherwise noted. Analytical data were identical to those reported above.
(1S,5R)-6-Azabicyclo[3.2.0]hept-3-en-7-one 13 (1S,5R)-tert-Butyl-7-oxo-6-azabicyclo[3.2.0]hept-3-ene-6-
carboxylate 18e
6-Azabicyclo[3.2.0]hept-3-en-7-one38 (55.0 g, 504 mmol) was
added to diisopropyl ether (1000 mL) and filtered through a por- To a solution of 13 (1.00 g, 9.16 mmol), DMAP (0.22 g,
osity 3 glass sintered funnel to give a yellow homogeneous sol- 1.8 mmol) and Et3N (3.80 mL, 27.3 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran
ution. Novozyme® 435 (53.0 g, 53 mg mL−1) and distilled (20 mL), Boc2O (2.00 g, 9.16 mmol) was added in several por-
water (9.10 mL, 1.00 equiv.) was added. The reaction mixture tions at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred at ambient temperature
was heated, without stirring, to 70 °C over 1 h and maintained at over the weekend. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl
that temperature for 11 h. The reaction mixture was allowed to acetate (60 mL) and washed with water (3 × 20 mL). The
cool overnight and the enzyme filtered off. The enzyme was organic extract was dried over sodium sulfate, filtered and con-
washed with diisopropyl ether (5 × 75 mL) and the combined centrated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by flash
organic fractions were evaporated to give an orange solid. The chromatography (SiO2, hexane–ethyl acetate, 4 : 1) to afford 18e
solid was recrystallized from diisopropyl ether (75 mL) to afford (1.44 g, 75%) as an orange oil. The spectral and analytical prop-
D −42.0 (c 0.5 in
13 (23.0 g, 42%) as a crystalline tan solid. [α]20 erties matched those reported in the literature.36
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 1870–1876 | 1873
View Online
(1S,4R)-4-(2,6-Dichloro-9H-purin-9-yl)-N-tosylcyclopent-2- to afford 19 (12.8 g, 75%) as a white solid. The solid was iso-
enecarboxamide 19 lated as a tenacious acetone adduct which could not be removed
after extended high vacuum drying at 60 °C. This adduct had no
Small scale. To a stirred solution of tetrabutylammonium salt consequence in the next step though.
of 2,6-dichloropurine (0.67 g, 1.5 mmol) in anhydrous THF
(20 mL) was added DMF (10 mL). Pd(OAc)2 (34 mg,
0.15 mmol) and triisopropyl phosphite (0.21 mL, 0.91 mmol) Routes to (1S,4R)-4-(2,6-dichloro-9H-purin-9-yl)-N-methyl-N-
were added and stirred under argon at ambient temperature for tosylcyclopent-2-enecarboxamide 20
1 h. A solution of 18d (0.40 g, 1.5 mmol) in dry THF (5 mL)
was added drop wise to the resultant mixture, which was then Iodomethane as the electrophile. Compound 19 (5.00 g,
stirred for a further 2 h. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, 11.05 mmol) in acetone (50 mL) was reacted with methyl iodide
and the residue was purified by flash chromatography (SiO2, (6.81 g, 48.0 mmol) in the presence of K2CO3 (4.58 g,
Published on 07 December 2011 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2OB06775G
dichloromethane–methanol, 19 : 1) to give 19 (0.33 g, 49%) as a 33.2 mmol) at reflux temperature for 4 h. The reaction mixture
was filtered through Celite and the Celite pad was washed with
yellow solid. mp 214–215 °C (from MeOH); [α]25 D −81.6 (c 0.50
in MeOH); νmax/cm−1 3256, 2966, 1686, 1683, 1609, 1503; δH additional acetone (50 mL). The solvent was evaporated and the
(400 MHz, CDCl3, Me4Si) 12.35 (brs, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, residue was taken into ethyl acetate (50 mL), and washed with
2H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H) 6.22–6.18 (m, 1H), 6.12–6.07 (m, water (25 mL) and brine (25 mL). The organic extract was dried
1H), 5.7.–5.63 (m, 1H), 3.76–3.68 (m, 1H), 2.80–2.70 (m,1H), over sodium sulfate, filtered and evaporated. The residue was tri-
2.38 (s, 3H), 2.00–2.05 (m, 1H); δC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 171.1, D −73.3
turated with diethyl ether to afford 20 (3.80 g, 74%). [α]20
Downloaded by Brown University on 28 June 2012
152.9, 150.8, 149.5, 146.1, 144.3, 136.2, 135.1, 130.9, 130.6, (c 0.5 in MeOH); νmax/cm−1 3256, 2966, 1686, 1683, 1609,
129.5, 127.5, 59.6, 50.7, 32.8, 21.0; m/z 452.0342 (MH+, 1503; δH (400 MHz, CDCl3, Me4Si) 8.33 (s, 1H), 7.76 (d, J =
C18H16Cl2N5O3S requires 452.0351). 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.21–6.78 (m, 1H),
6.01–5.99 (m, 1H), 5.87–5.83 (m, 1H), 4.60–4.57 (m, 1H), 3.27
(s, 3H), 2.93–2.85 (m, 1H), 2.47 (s, 3H), 2.20–2.14 (m, 1H); δC
Large scale preparation. 2,6-Dichloropurine (15.0 g, (100 MHz, CDCl3) 173.7, 152.7, 152.6, 151.5, 145.5, 145.3,
79.0 mmol) was partially dissolved into tetrahydrofuran 136.8, 135.8, 130.8, 130.5, 130.2, 127.2, 59.4, 50.9, 35.5, 33.4,
(50 mL). A freshly prepared solution of tetrabutylammonium 21.6; m/z 466.0524 (MH+, C19H18Cl2N5O3S requires 466.0507).
hydroxide hydrate (Sigma-Aldrich, 63.5 g, 79.0 mmol) in deio-
nised water (200 mL) was added to the reaction mixture. The Dimethylsulfate as the electrophile. Compound 19 (1.00 g,
mixture solubilised and after 2 h the solvents were evaporated. 2.21 mmol) in acetone (50 mL) was reacted with dimethylsulfate
Toluene (50 mL) was added and evaporated to dryness again. (0.73 g, 5.7 mmol) in the presence of K2CO3 (0.76 g,
This process was repeated twice more. The semi-solid residue 5.53 mmol) at ambient temperature overnight. The reaction
was triturated with diethyl ether (300 mL) under rapid stirring mixture was filtered through Celite and the Celite pad was
for 3 h. The solids were filtered and dried under high vacuum to washed with additional acetone (50 mL). The solvent was evap-
afford tetrabutylammonium 2,6-dichloropurin-9-ide (32.2 g, orated and the residue was taken into ethyl acetate (50 mL), and
94%) as a white free-flowing solid. The solid was stored in a washed with water (25 mL) and brine (25 mL). The organic
well sealed desiccator and away from light when not in use. extract was dried over sodium sulfate, filtered and evaporated.
Pd2(dba)3 (1.74 g, 1.90 mmol) and triisopropylphosphite The residue was triturated with diethyl ether to afford 20 (0.72 g,
(2.00 mL, 7.70 mmol) were added to dry tetrahydrofuran 70%). The analytical data matched those reported above.
(100 mL), degassed and purged with nitrogen 5 times, and
allowed to stir for 30 min during which time the solution Mitsunobu reaction. To a stirring solution of 19 (0.65 g,
changed from purple to dark green. Tetrabutylammonium 2,6- 1.44 mmol) in THF–CH2Cl2 (1 : 1, 20 mL) was added methanol
dichloropurin-9-ide (16.4 g, 38.0 mmol) was added and allowed (0.2 mL), PPh3 (1.33 g, 5.76 mmol), and diisopropyl azodicar-
to stir until all the solids had dissolved. Finally, 18d (10.0 g, boxylate (0.98 mL, 5.74 mmol). After stirring for 30 min under
38.4 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was degassed argon, the solvent was evaporated in vacuo to give a residue,
and purged with nitrogen 5 times. The reaction mixture was which was purified by flash chromatography (SiO2 hexane–ethyl
allowed to stir for 90 min. The reaction mixture was filtered acetate, 1 : 2) to afford 20 (0.63 g, 1.35 mmol, 94%) as a solid.
through Celite and the Celite pad was washed with additional The analytical data matched those reported above.
tetrahydrofuran (3 × 50 mL). The solvent was evaporated to give
a red oil. Analysis by proton NMR suggested that the N7 vs. N9 ((1S,4R)-4-(2-Chloro-6-(cyclopropylamino)-9H-purin-9-yl)
substitution ratio as 7% and 93% respectively. The oil was taken cyclopent-2-en-1-yl)methanol 21
up into ethyl acetate (500 mL) and washed with 10% HCl (4 ×
50 mL) and brine (50 mL). The organic extract was dried over A solution of 20 (2.80 g, 6.00 mmol) in isopropyl alcohol
magnesium sulfate, filtered and evaporated to dryness to afford a (8 mL) and tetrahydrofuran (32 mL) was cooled to 0 °C. Sodium
red glass. The glass was rapidly stirred in hexane (50 mL) and borohydride (0.227 g, 6.00 mmol) was added portion wise over
acetone (75 mL) was added until solids started to crash out of 1 min, and stirring was continued until TLC analysis indicated a
solution. The heterogeneous solution was stirred at 0 °C for complete reaction. This took 60 min. The reaction was quenched
30 min and filtered. The solids were washed with chilled with water (20 mL) at 0 °C and allowed to warm to ambient
acetone–hexane mixtures (1 : 1, 3 × 15 mL), and air-dried on the temperature for 2 h. The reaction mixture was taken into ethyl
filter for 5 min. The solids were further dried under high vacuum acetate (100 mL) and washed with water (50 mL) and brine
1874 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 1870–1876 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
View Online
(2 × 50 mL). The aqueous layer was re-extracted with ethyl overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate
acetate (2 × 50 mL). The pooled organic extract was dried over (50 mL) and washed with water (3 × 25 mL) and brine (20 mL).
magnesium sulfate, filtered and evaporated to give a brown The organic extract was dried over sodium sulfate, filtered and
residue. Flash chromatography (SiO2, hexane–ethyl acetate, evaporated to give an oil that was chromatographed (SiO2, ethyl
1 : 2) afforded ((1S,4R)-4-(2,6-dichloro-9H-purin-9-yl)cyclopent- acetate–methanol, 98 : 2) twice by way of preparative TLC to
2-en-1-yl)methanol (1.48 g, 86%) as a viscous oil. δH afford ((1S,4R)-4-(6-(cyclopropylamino)-2-((4-methoxybenzyl)
(400 MHz, CDCl3, Me4Si) 8.52 (s, 1H), 6.25–6.23 (m, 1H), amino)-9H-purin-9-yl)cyclopent-2-en-1-yl)methanol 23 (0.21 g,
5.88–5.85 (m, 1H), 5.80–5.77 (m, 1H), 3.90 (dd, J = 10.5, 3.7, 90%) as an orange gum. [α]20 D −2.7 (c 0.50 in CHCl3); δH
1H), 3.75 (dd, J = 10.5, 3.7, 1H), 3.50 (brs, 1H), 3.12–3.10 (m, (400 MHz, CDCl3, Me4Si) 7.41 (s, 1H), 7.30 (d, J = 8.7, 2H),
1H), 2.93–2.84 (m, 1H), 1.92–1.86 (m, 1H); δC (100 MHz, 6.81 (d, J = 8.7, 2H), 6.09–6.03 (m, 1H), 5.90 (brs, 1H),
CDCl3) 152.7, 152.6, 151.2, 145.7, 140.3, 130.6, 128.8, 64.0, 5.79–5.73 (m, 1H), 5.46–5.37 (m, 1H), 5.24–5.16 (m, 1H), 4.56
60.6, 47.5, 34.0. The data matched those in the literature.35 Dry (brs, 1H), 4.54 (brs, 1H), 3.83–3.77 (m, 1H), 3.76 (s, 3H),
Published on 07 December 2011 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2OB06775G
ethanol (10 mL) was added to the above oil (1.48 g, 5.19 mmol) 3.74–6.37 (m, 1H), 3.05 (brs, 1H), 2.94 (brs, 1H), 2.82–2.64 (m,
and stirred until the oil dissolved completely. Cyclopropylamine 1H), 2.21 (brs, 1H), 2.08–1.97 (m, 1H), 0.83–0.72 (m, 2H),
(2.00 mL, 28. 4 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was 0.62–0.49 (m, 2H); δC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 159.0, 158.6, 156.0,
warmed to 50 °C and maintained at that temperature for 5 h. The 137.7, 136.2, 132.5, 130.6, 129.1, 114.9, 113.7, 65.2, 60.8, 55.2,
solvent was evaporated and the residue taken up into acetone 47.7, 45.4, 32.7, 23.6, 7.2; m/z 407.2208 (MH+, C22H27N6O2
(25 mL) and stirred with sodium bicarbonate (500 mg) for requires 407.2195).
Downloaded by Brown University on 28 June 2012
30 min. The organic layer was filtered and evaporated to give a Compound 23 (0.16 g, 0.38 mmol) was dissolved into chloro-
residue that was purified by flash chromatography (SiO2, ethyl form (5 mL) and stirred under nitrogen. TFA (1.5 mL) was
acetate) to afford 21 (1.15 g, 3.76 mmol, 73%) as a white foam added and the reaction mixture was heated at 50 °C for 18 h.
that collapsed into a gum over time. [α]20 D = 23.3 (c 0.50 in More TFA (2.5 mL) was added and stirring was continued an
CHCl3) νmax/cm−1 3322, 3256, 1686, 1683, 1503; δH additional 18 h at 50 °C. Finally, an additional aliquot of TFA
(400 MHz, CDCl3, Me4Si) 7.81 (s, 1H), 6.80 (brs, 1H), 6.14 (m, (2.5 mL) was added and stirring was continued for 18 h at
1H), 5.81 (m, 1H), 5.62 (m, 1H), 3.77 (m, 1H), 3.66 (m, 1H), 50 °C. The solvent was evaporated and the residue was neutral-
2.97 (m, 3H), 2.81 (m, 1H), 1.81 (m, 1H), 0.87 (m, 2H), 0.6 (m, ized with saturated sodium carbonate solution (20 mL) and
2H); δC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 156.2, 154.1, 138.9, 138.8, 129.6, extracted with chloroform (4 × 10 mL) and dried over mag-
118.6, 64.5, 60.0, 47.5, 34.0, 7.2; m/z 306.1122 (MH+, nesium sulfate. Preparative TLC (SiO2, chloroform–methanol,
C14H17ClN5O requires 306.1122). 97 : 3) afforded 2b (0.080 g, 73%) as a solid. The analytical data
matched those given earlier for 2b above.
Routes to Abacavir 2b
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012 Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 1870–1876 | 1875
View Online
19 S. J. C. Taylor, R. McCague, R. Wisdom, C. Lee, K. Dickson, 29 G.-I. An and H. Rhee, Nucleosides, Nucleotides Nucleic Acids, 2002, 21, 65.
G. Ruecroft, F. O’Brien, J. Littlechild, J. Bevan, S. M Roberts and C. 30 M. T. Crimmins, B. W King, W. J. Zuercher and A. L. Choy, J. Org.
T. Evans, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1993, 4, 1117. Chem., 2000, 65, 8499.
20 M. J. Mulvihill, J. A. Gage and M. J. Miller, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 31 S. M. Daluge, M. T. Martin, B. R. Sickles and D. A. Livingston, Nucleo-
3357. sides, Nucleotides Nucleic Acids, 2000, 19, 297.
21 C. Kaneko, A. Sugimoto and S. Tanaka, Synthesis, 1974, 876. 32 M. T. Crimmins and W. J. Zuercher, Org. Lett., 2000, 2, 1065.
22 D. R. Deardorff, C. Q. Windham and C. L. Craney1, Org. Synth., 1996, 33 H. F. Olivo and J. Yu, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1, 1998, 3, 391.
73, 25. 34 S. M. Daluge, S. S. Good, M. B. Faletto, W. H. Miller, M. H St. Clair,
23 K. Laumen and M. P. Schneider, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1986, L. R. Boone, M. Tisdale, N. R. Parry, J. E. Reardon, R. E. Dornsife,
1298. D. R. Averett and T. A Krenitsky, Antimicrob. Agents and Chem., 1997,
24 E. Forró and F. Fülöp, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2004, 15, 573. 41, 1082.
25 For an analogous reaction on 2-azabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-en-3-one, see: 35 M. T. Crimmins and B. W. King, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 4192.
N. Katagiri, M. Takebayashi, H. Kokufuda, C. Kaneko, K. Kanehira and 36 L. Kiss, E. Forró, R. Sillanpaa and F. Fülöp, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72,
M. Torihara, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 1580. 8786.
26 A. Vazquez-Romero, J. Rodriguez, A. Lledo, X. Verdaguer and A. Riera, 37 Utilizing 2,6-dichloro-9H-purine has two advantages over 2,6-diamino-
Published on 07 December 2011 on http://pubs.rsc.org | doi:10.1039/C2OB06775G
Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 4509. 9H-purine and 2-amino-6-chloro-9H-purine as the nucleophile: it has
27 A. Kim and J. H. Hong, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 2007, 28, 1545. good solubility, and the resulting product does not require protection for
28 M. Freiria, A. J. Whitehead and W. B. Motherwell, Synthesis, 2005, 18, subsequent alkylation chemistry. For example see ref. 25.
3079. 38 T. Durst and M. J. O’sullivan, J. Org. Chem., 1970, 56, 2043.
Downloaded by Brown University on 28 June 2012
1876 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 1870–1876 This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012