Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Suku As Self-Representation For The Adat Perpatih

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

SUKU AS SELF-REPRESENTATION FOR THE ADAT PERPATIH COMMUNITY IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021)

SUKU AS SELF-REPRESENTATION FOR THE ADAT PERPATIH


COMMUNITY IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA

AW Radzuan
Faculty of Creative Technology and Heritage Universiti Malaysia Kelantan Malaysia
E-mail: ainul@umk.edu.my

Aw Radzuan. Suku As Self-Representation For The Adat Perpatih Community In


Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia--Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology
18(4), 6853-6864. ISSN 1567-214x

Keywords: Adat Perpatih; Belonging; Customary Law; Identity; Intangible Cultural


Heritage

ABSTRACT
This article considers the importance of suku (clan) for the adat perpatih community in
Negeri Sembilan. Generally, Malays in Negeri Sembilan practise adat perpatih as part of their
customary law, with suku being one of the fundamental principles with which its
contemporary members identify. Without suku, adat perpatih could not continue to exist.
However, suku has increasingly been practised less by adat perpatih community members
due to their preferences changing over time. Accordingly, this study examined the importance
of suku for members of the adat perpatih community in Negeri Sembilan, especially the
impact of suku on their life. Twelve research participants participated in the study, which
involved in-depth interviews and participant observations. This revealed 12 different suku
divisions, with the practice of suku generally found to enable recognition of community, the
representation of identity, a sense of belonging, and an act of protection and security.

INTRODUCTION
Adat perpatih is considered part of intangible cultural heritage (ICH) of
Malaysia. As one of the customary laws in the country (apart of adat
temenggong, which favours the father‟s side), adat perpatih is practised by the
Malays of Negeri Sembilan. The literature generally indicates that adat
perpatih originated in West Sumatra, Indonesia, and was brought to the Malay
lands in the 19th century by Minangkabau immigrants (Abdul Khalid, 1992;
Mohamed Ibrahim, 1968; Peletz, 1988; Tan-Wong, 1992). However, adat
perpatih has also been recognised as a mix between the existing adat (customs)
of the Orang Asli in Negeri Sembilan and the adat which arrived with the
Minangkabau (Peletz, 1988). Despite arguments surrounding its origin, adat

6853
SUKU AS SELF-REPRESENTATION FOR THE ADAT PERPATIH COMMUNITY IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021)

perpatih has continued to significantly influence the life of the adat perpatih
community, especially the Malays.

Besides that, countless researches have also been conducted on the notion
of adat perpatih. For example, Idris et al. (2015) has conducted research on the
inheritance of the customary land amongst the practitioners of adat perpatih in
Negeri Sembilan, particularly related to the implementation of the Customary
Tenure Enactment (CTE) that allows members within the suku (clan) to
transfer the ownership of the land to the foreigners and outsiders (Idris et al.,
2015). Other research within the context of adat perpatih and adat law can also
be seen on the study of customary sayings and their meanings and patterns
(Jaafar et al., 2017), awareness and understanding of adat perpatih from the
local communities (Abdul Latif et al., 2018), as well as the impacts of the
traditional systems of land distribution to the households, clans and others
(Kristiansen & Sulistiawati, 2016).

In adat perpatih, suku is one of the predominant practices that make up adat
perpatih‟s system. Suku is a term that can be translated as a clan that traced the
lineage and kinship of an individual from the mother‟s (female) side. Suku
(clan) has an important position in adat perpatih, determining, for example,
property inheritance, political administration and marriage. It is divided into
12 divisions: biduanda, batu hampar, paya kumbuh (pekumbuh), mungkal, tiga
nenek, seri melenggang (semelenggang), seri lemak (selemak), batu belang,
tanah datar, (tedatar), anak Acheh, anak Melaka and Tiga batu (Ibrahim,
1992:46). However, suku has lost its influence. According to You and
Hardwick (2020), most contemporary local communities had been challenged
by rapid cultural change, globalisation and political movements, as well as
religious changes that had rendered many ICH practices powerless. In this
context, this article aims to understand the roles of suku from the perspectives
of the local practitioners by exploring the sustained significance of suku for
the Malays of Negeri Sembilan, including how it is practised. This study finds
that suku represents identity and confers a sense of belonging, as well as
providing protection and security.

LITERATURE REVIEW
Adat perpatih was recognised as ICH by the Department of National Heritage
Malaysia under the National Heritage Act in 2012 (Bernama, 2012). In this
context, adat perpatih is considered the customary laws and living traditions of
the Malays, particularly in Negeri Sembilan, which emphasise their
uniqueness, rich culture and traditions related to matrilineal descent. Tasked
with recognising the importance of ICH for the world‟s communities, the
Convention for the Safeguarding of the ICH was enacted. This convention has
four designated purposes enabling it to serve this purpose:

(i) to safeguard the intangible cultural heritage, (ii) to ensure respect for the
intangible cultural heritage of the communities, groups and individuals
concerned, (iii) to raise awareness at the local, national, and international level
of the importance of the intangible cultural heritage, and of ensuring mutual
appreciation thereof, and (iv) to provide for international cooperation and
assistance. (UNESCO, 2003:2)

6854
SUKU AS SELF-REPRESENTATION FOR THE ADAT PERPATIH COMMUNITY IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021)

This Convention has inspired States Parties (countries which have adhered to
the World Heritage Convention of UNESCO) to expand their fields of
preservation, conservation and safeguarding of heritage sites to include
intangible heritage. However, a broader discussion of ICH by academicians,
practitioners, heritage professionals and researchers has exposed various
issues, such as the definition of ICH, types of ICH, the involvement of local
communities and heritage professionals and protection of ICH. Additionally,
State Parties have started to develop national laws to ensure the protection of
ICH.

For example, Malaysia developed the National Heritage Act 2005 to manage
all matters related to ICH. In the National Heritage Act (2005:16), ICH is
defined as

Any forms of expression, languages, lingual utterances, sayings, musically


produced tunes, notes, audible lyrics, songs, folksongs, oral traditions, poetry,
music, dances as produced by the performing arts, theatrical plays, audible
compositions of sounds and music, martial arts, that may have existed or exist
in relation to the heritage of Malaysia or any part of Malaysia or in relation to
the heritage of a Malaysian community.

Meanwhile, in the Convention for the Safeguarding of ICH 2003, ICH is


considered

The practices, representations, expressions, knowledge, skills – as well as the


instruments, objects, artefacts and cultural spaces associated therewith – that
communities, groups and, in some cases, individuals recognise as part of their
cultural heritage. This intangible cultural heritage, transmitted from generation
to generation, is constantly recreated by communities and groups in response
to their environment, their interaction with nature and their history, and
provides them with a sense of identity and continuity, thus promoting respect
for cultural diversity and human creativity. (UNESCO, 2003:2)

Accordingly, ICH manifests within five domains: (i) oral traditions and
expression, including language as a vehicle of ICH, (ii) performing arts, (iii)
social practices, rituals and festive events, (iv) knowledge and practices
concerning nature and the universe, (e) traditional craftsmanship (UNESCO,
2003).

Building on the UNESCO definition, Arizpe (2007) has suggested several


other elements that could be regarded as ICH, including life (birth, rites of
ages and betrothal, wedding and death), social elements (kinship, community,
settlements, broader and nation), biodiversity (botany, zoology, pharmacopeia,
agriculture), land (nature, beliefs, names, landscapes and property), symbolic
elements (signs, representations, rituals and flags), spiritual elements (cosmos
vision, animistic beliefs, sacred books, liturgies), literary elements (oral
literature, including legends and epic stories, and printed literature),
performing arts (high arts and local arts), and festivities (season's calendar,
games, religious festivals, school festivals).

6855
SUKU AS SELF-REPRESENTATION FOR THE ADAT PERPATIH COMMUNITY IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021)

Meanwhile, Logan (2007) defined ICH as „heritage that is embodied in people


as opposed to inanimate object‟, and Arrunnapaporn (2009) emphasised ICH,
in a research context, as „aesthetic, the importance of non-spiritual, symbolic
or other social values people may associate with a site, as well as rituals,
music, language, know-how, oral traditions, and the cultural spaces in which
these “living heritage” traditions are played out‟ (Arrunnapaporn, 2009:149).

Various definitions of ICH have also been elaborated within academia,


government and non-governmental organisations, especially in cases where
ICH is close to the heart of a community, with its continued presence
determining the existence and continuity of a local community. For such
purposes, community has been described as „a homogeneous group in which
no internal discrepancies and no intra and inter-individual differences are
recognised‟ (Wiesenfeld, 1996:338). Community members usually share
similar characteristics in terms of residential, work, recreational, political, and
religious components of their lives and are connected through socio-emotional
ties which produce belonging (Wiesenfeld, 1996:339).

Many scholars have discussed ICH producing cultural identity for peoples,
groups, nations and communities (Aikawa, 2007; Vecco, 2010) That is, ICH
functions to create social and personal identity for individuals and the local
community, with identity important for maintaining individual and group roots
in a changing world. Most extant ICH reflects legacies from the past,
providing a sense of continuity of the community (Lee, 2017:197). According
to Lee (2017:195), ICH not only connects individuals, groups and
communities in terms of belonging and identity but also offers deep spiritual,
emotional and social links. Notably, UNESCO has encouraged human
interaction in a mutual understanding of ICH, enabling people to retain their
sense of identity and cultural continuity at the same time as promoting cultural
diversity and human creativity (UNESCO, 2005)

Some ICHs are represented in the form of languages, performances, practices


and dances, sometimes representing a whole country. Smeets (2004) indicated
that language is essential for providing both groups and individuals identity,
acting as a vehicle for expressing shared ICH between people belonging to a
particular group or community. Building on this, Reid (1997) discussed the
languages spoken to represent identity as Kadazan or Dusun in Sabah,
Malaysia. The Kadazan and Dusun are indigenous people of Malaysia, and the
Malaysian government has permitted their languages to be taught at schools
(Reid, 1997). In this context, the collective efforts from the press, religious
institutions and the government are considered to support the maintenance and
sustenance of the indigenous dialects, enabling the preservation of those
cultures.

Additionally, Aikawa (2007) recognised that ICH publicly symbolises and


provides value to the cultural identities of people, groups and nations (Aikawa,
2007). That is, the identity of one‟s society and community could be
determined through immaterial criteria in the ICH and represented at various
levels, including „national, regional, and local, even … family‟ (Logan,
2007:35). Accordingly, ICH can produce a sense of pride that leads those who

6856
SUKU AS SELF-REPRESENTATION FOR THE ADAT PERPATIH COMMUNITY IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021)

practise it to feel the need to preserve and protect their heritage. For Logan,
ICH provides „reminders of how societies can go wrong; they provide salutary
lessons for the present and future generations. Heritage, tangible and
intangible provides the basis of humanity‟s rich cultural diversity‟ (Logan,
2007:35).

Consequently, ICHs need to be safeguarded because ICHs express the


creativity of and stimulate a sense of belonging for particular groups of
people. Traditional innovation and creativity can be seen as passages
connecting the past and the future. Additionally, a sense of belonging to a
group or community could acknowledge an individual‟s existence and
differentiate that individual from those that who do not belong to the group,
while also acknowledging that, despite the differences between members of a
community in terms of skills and resources, all members share a group feeling
(Wiesenfeld, 1996:341). Belonging to a certain group or community enables a
person to feel a guarantee of safety, comfort and group interdependence
(Block, 2008:3).

As social beings, human are usually dependent upon one another; historically,
this provided humans with resources such as food, protection from harm and
the knowledge and ability to cultivate their skills (Carvallo & Gabriel,
2006:697) Community consolidates this notion to guarantee a sense of
security, which involves not only emotions and feelings but also physical
safety (Hayfield & Schug, 2019:391). Additionally, safety, as conceived by
members of a community, is adhered to, for example, welfare systems,
healthcare systems and family policies (Hayfield & Schug, 2019:391).

In the context of adat perpatih, suku is considered to fundamentally ensure the


continued existence of adat perpatih in Negeri Sembilan. Each suku is headed
by a tua (or lembaga) and generally divided into various family units, which
are headed by a senior male member on the wife‟s side called „ibubapa‟ (or
buapaak). The general population is divided into twelve suku, and each suku is
generally an exogamous unit, with the principle of exogamy specifying the
entrance of new males into each suku. In this context, a suku is a husband-
receiving unit (tempat semenda), and a man is always the person marrying into
the suku (orang semenda) (Kling, 1992:15).

Each suku is subdivided into the perut (womb, or major lineage), jurai (or
ruang; minor lineage) and the matrilocal family units (keluarga). At each level,
the actual kinship links can be traced and established. The deeper the level, the
higher the level of grouping.While the kinship links between members are
only putatively established at the suku and perut levels, this makes
membership already too large for real accounting. Nonetheless, the reality of
such links is not questioned; instead, the links are taken for granted as having
already been sacredly established by a single ancestress in ancient times
(Kling, 1992:15). Therefore, suku important allows members of the adat
perpatih community to be acknowledged as adat perpatih practitioner and
ensures their presence in the adat perpatih world.

6857
SUKU AS SELF-REPRESENTATION FOR THE ADAT PERPATIH COMMUNITY IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021)

METHODOLOGY
This study took a qualitative approach, and fieldwork for data collection was
conducted using ethnographic principles. In-depth interviews and participant
observations were used to understand symbols, artefacts and other sources of
data from a local perspective, as prescribed by Fetterman (2010) and Fielding
(2008). Elements of the symbolic environment and surroundings (Fielding,
2008) were revealed through an ethnographic approach to the practice of adat
perpatih among the Malays of Negeri Sembilan; that is, the underlying
meaning of certain behaviours, articulations and interactions between
members of the society, especially issues concerning how contemporary
Malays perceived and represented the adat perpatih.

Table 1: Research Participants of adat perpatih

Research Participants Gender (F/M) Age


(RP)
RP1 F 50s
RP2 M 60s
RP3 F 60s
RP4 F 30s
RP5 M 30s
RP6 F 30s
RP7 F 30s
RP8 F 30s
RP9 M 30s
RP10 F 70s
RP11 F 30s
RP12 F 20s

When approaching research participants, the study utilised a purposive


sampling technique. Having specific target and purpose of this study made it
more convenient (Creswell, 2013) for the researcher to approach research
participants. As Table 1 shows, 12 research participants were interviewed; to
protect their identity, research participants were coded as RP1 through to
RP12. Research participants were recruited from a broad range of age groups,
educations and occupations to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the
topic. During the interview sessions and participant observations, information
was collected in various ways, with the documentation stage following the
process of „logging data‟ developed by Lofland and Lofland (1995:66). The
various forms of data recording included observational field notes, interview
write-ups, mapping, census taking, photographing, sound recording and
document collection (Creswell, 2013:149)

Given qualitative data centred on the importance of events (Miles et al., 2014)
that occurred during the fieldwork, reports of such events were descriptive and
narrative oriented. This necessitated a process of interpreting, explaining,
understanding and reflecting on original impressions and intuitions of what
had occurred during the fieldwork (Dey, 1993). This study used thematic

6858
SUKU AS SELF-REPRESENTATION FOR THE ADAT PERPATIH COMMUNITY IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021)

analysis, with all the fieldwork‟s raw data transcribed and analysed using
analytic memo-ing, as recommended by Dey (1993) and Miles et al. (2014).

This constituted an extended version of the narrative reporting style, in which


data needs to be synthesised into higher-level analytic meanings (Saldana et
al., 2011). Ultimately, analysis led the viewpoints and emic perspectives of
research perceptions to guide understanding of the Malay perceptions of adat
perpatih.

Findings and Discussions

This study revealed that suku has various significant roles in the adat perpatih
community. Categorisation of these roles promoted discussion in the context
of three overarching themes; suku as formation of identity, suku as providing a
sense of belonging, and suku as protection and safety.

Suku as formation of identity

Adat perpatih has been listed as ICH by Malaysia‟s Department of National


Heritage, Malaysia; a feature of ICH mentioned is „self-identification‟
(Lenzerini, 2011:101). In this study, the Malays who practised adat perpatih in
Negeri Sembilan identified themselves according to their suku. As mentioned,
suku acts as a form of identification for an individual, expressing their status
as adat perpatih practitioners. Twelve divisions of suku have been described
by Ibrahim (1992:46): biduanda, batu hampar, paya kumbuh (pekumbuh),
mungkal, tiga nenek, seri melenggang (semelenggang), seri lemak (selemak),
batu belang, tanah datar, (tedatar), anak Acheh, anak Melaka and Tiga batu.
Belonging to one of these suku, hence, forms part of an individual‟s identity.

For example, RP11 identified herself as part of the suku Tiga batu, while RP1
and RP12 were from the suku Semelenggang. Meanwhile, RP5 explained that
he belonged to suku Selemak, the suku of his mother:

I followed my mother‟s suku. According to adat perpatih, the children will


follow the mother‟s suku. From my father‟s side, he is from suku Tiga batu.
(Interview, RP5)

Elsewhere, RP10 claimed that she was from suku Selemak and her late
husband was from orang lingkungan (Interview, RP10), explaining that orang
lingkungan was part of the adat lingkungan surrounding Seri Menanti. Given
the interview took place at Seri Menanti, some community members followed
the adat lingkungan, a type of adat applied to the Yang di-Pertuan Besar of
Negeri Sembilan and his officials. In the confined lingkungan area, the Yang
di-Pertuan Besar has full authority and the right to find his own followers
among adat perpatih members, with the permission of other adat perpatih
leaders (such as Penghulu and Undang) (Selat, 2014). Generally, this study
found that most research participants were very conscious of where they
belonged, able to explain their suku.

6859
SUKU AS SELF-REPRESENTATION FOR THE ADAT PERPATIH COMMUNITY IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021)

Aligning with the suku practices in the adat perpatih community of Negeri
Sembilan, which clearly emphasise the importance of the maternal lineage,
Campelo et al. (2014:159) recognised the importance of ancestry for the
people of the Chathams, which are strongly connected to Maori or European
settlers, who consider ancestry to have the power to connect individuals to
history, land, rights and ownership, as well as providing a sense of belonging.
This genealogical relation enables communities to claim their sense of self and
family identity as having been passed down through generations, with roles
and responsibility inherited to continue instructing the community on how to
be a part of the world in the present.

Suku provides a sense of belonging

Suku also provides the Malays of the adat perpatih community in Negeri
Sembilan with a sense of belonging. A sense of belonging for these
communities is derived from their suku, with a strong sense of brotherhood
within a suku leading a suku‟s members to acknowledge each another as
family. When a new member becomes part of a suku, a berkedim (being a
brother) ceremony takes place, allowing the new member to be recognised and
accepted into the adat perpatih community. Given berkedim is one of the most
dominant practices in the adat perpatih system, the process allows individuals
to feel a sense of belonging and feel reassured of their safety and well-being.

For human needs, „belonging‟ is essential. According to Baumeister and


Leary, „as John Donne famously wrote in 1975, “No [person] is an island”‟
(1995:497), a statement Baumeister and Leary (1995:497). Those authors also
refer to the psychological theory proposed by Abraham Maslow, known as
Maslow‟s hierarchy of needs. This theory positions love and the need to
belong at the centre of human life, demonstrating the importance for fitting in
and adapting to human needs, with Baumeister and Leary (1995:499)„…the
need to belong [is] found to some degree in all humans, in all cultures,
although naturally … there [are] individual differences in strength and
intensity, as well as cultural and individual variations in how people express
and satisfy the need‟ (1995:499).

It is important to emphasise that the continued practice of adat perpatih


awakens a sense of belonging and identity amongst Malays in Negeri
Sembilan, with the ICH described by UNESCO (2003) encouraging a sense of
identity and continuity for the local community. According to Peletz, most
Malays of the Negeri Sembilan are proud of their roots in Minangkabau,
which distinguish their sense of culture (Peletz, 1988b; 1994b), and provide
them with a sense of „home‟, place and memory (Naguib, 2013). Additionally,
most Malays in Negeri Sembilan speak their own dialect, which also reflects
their affiliation with the Minangkabau culture (Mat Awal et al., 2013).

Suku as protection and safety

Belonging to a group can also be seen to offer „protection‟; that is, an


individual‟s welfare is assured by grouping with others (Baumeister & Leary,
1995); normally, an individual forms an attachment to a group through some

6860
SUKU AS SELF-REPRESENTATION FOR THE ADAT PERPATIH COMMUNITY IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021)

similarity and sharing of cultural traits, as well as through social relations


(Campelo et al., 2014). Being a group member enables an individual to receive
privileges, including protection, care, security and mutual defence from harm
(Baumeister and Leary, 1995). This is similar to a child requiring not only care
and food but also protection from their parents (Baumeister and Leary, 1995).
Additionally, in certain cases, an individual might receive assistance from
others to care for their children and ensure their welfare if they die. Trust and
social bonds within the community guarantee this, allowing an individual to
feel generally safe and secure (Baumeister and Leary, 1995).

The protection system for members of a suku was materialised in the case of a
man who needed to return to his original family after his wife died. According
to RP11,

…the man will return to their main rumpun [family] or their mother‟s
homeland if he does not have anywhere to go. … if he was kicked out by his
family or wife, he can stay [temporarily] and live with his relatives … adat
perpatih looks after his or her blood and heirs. (Interview, RP11)

RP 11 also explained in referring to her late husband that,

For example, in the case of my late husband, he had no female siblings, so he


could not inherit the inheritance. Therefore, the inheritance was returned to his
relatives [as rightful heirs]. Men are cared for and protected by their heirs
[referring to his mother, his sister(s) and nieces]. As people say, we will look
after them. (Interview, RP11)

Other examples include the berkedim ceremony, the process of a man entering
a suku. A berkedim is considered a process demanding substantial
responsibility from members of the adat perpatih community towards their
new member. Thus, this process requires members of an existing suku to
provide protection, loyalty and security to new members. However, being part
of a suku does not suggest a person automatically receives these things;
instead, they must observe the attitudes and behaviours of that society.
Notably, a person behaving inappropriately or being censured for misconduct
brings malu (shame) not only to their family but to the entire suku (Interview,
RP12).

Consequently, all members of a suku need to ensure that everybody plays their
part and is accountable for their actions and behaviours to ensure that the
legacy of their suku is safely carried into the future by the next generation.

CONCLUSION
This study‟s findings illustrated that suku is significant in the formation of
identity, providing a sense of belonging and acting as protection and security
for Malays of the adat perpatih community in Negeri Sembilan. Without suku,
the essence of adat perpatih would become less important and potentially lost.
As adat perpatih is not static system and is subjected to change to suit with the
evolving circumstances and modern needs, it is hoped that younger

6861
SUKU AS SELF-REPRESENTATION FOR THE ADAT PERPATIH COMMUNITY IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021)

generations could renew their interest in this important ICH so that, adat
perpatih could be sustained in the future.

REFERENCES
Abdul Khalid, A. A. 1992. Political Structure of Adat Perpatih. In N. S. L.
Tan-Wong & V. Patel (Eds.), Adat Perpatih: A Matrilineal System in
Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia and other Matrilineal Kinship Systems
throughout the World (pp. 14-20). Kuaa Lumpur: Wintrac Sdn. Bhd.
Abdul Latif, R., AAsbollah, A. Z., Kamari, M. N., & Mohd Sharif, T. 2018.
An exploration of awareness on the adat perpatih in Mukim Pantai,
Seremban, Negeri Sembilan. Asian Journal of Social Science
Research, 1(1), 1-17.
Aikawa, N. 2007. The conceptual development of UNESCO's programme on
intangible cultural heritage. In J. Blake (Ed.), Safeguarding intangible
cultural heritage: challenges and approaches (pp. 43-72). Built Wells:
Institute of Art and Law Ltd.
Arizpe, L. 2007. The cultural politics of intangible cultural heritage. In J.
Blake (Ed.), Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage: challenges and
approaches (pp. 25-42). Built Wells: Institutes of Art and Law Ltd.
Arrunnapaporn, A. B. 2009. Interpretation of intangible: atrocity heritage of
'death railway' of the River Kwai. In S. Lira, R. Amoeda, C. Pinheiro,
J. Pinheiro, & F. Oliveira (Eds.), Sharing cultures (pp. 149-155).
Barcelos, Portugal: Green Lines Institute for Sustainable Development
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. F. 1995. The need to belong: desire for
interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Psychological bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
Bernama. 2012. 154 butiran diisytihar sebagai warisan kebangsaan. Bernama.
http://www.sinarharian.com.my/nasional/154-butiran-diisytihar-
sebagai-warisan-kebangsaan-1.46869
Block, P. 2008. Community: the sturcture of belonging. San Francisco:
Berrett–Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Campelo, A., Aitken, R., Thyne, M., & Gnoth, J. 2014. Sense of place: the
importance for destination branding. Journal of Travel Research, 53(2),
154-166.
Carvallo, M., & Gabriel, S. 2006. No man is an island: the need to belong and
dismissing avoidant attachment style. Personality and Social
Psyachology Bulletin, 32(5), 697-709.
Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among
five approaches (3rd ed.). London: SAGE.
Dey, I. 1993. Qualitative data analysis: a user-friendly guide for social
scientists. London: Routledge.
Fetterman, D. M. 2010. Ethnography: step by step (Vol. 17). London: SAGE.
Fielding, N. 2008. Ethnography. In G. Nigel (Ed.), Researching social life (3rd
ed., Vol. 266-284). London: Sage.
Hayfield, E. A., & Schug, M. 2019. 'It's like they have a cognitive map of
relations': feeling strange in a small island community. Journal of
Intercultural Studies, 40(4), 383-398.
Ibrahim, N. 1992. Social structure and organisation of Negeri Sembilan
Malays. In N. S. L. Tan-Wong & V. Patel (Eds.), Adat perpatih: a
matrilineal system in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia and other matrilineal

6862
SUKU AS SELF-REPRESENTATION FOR THE ADAT PERPATIH COMMUNITY IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021)

kinship systems throughout the world (pp. 44-64). Kuala Lumpur:


Wintrac Sdn. Bhd.
Idris, A. S., Hussin, N., & Yussof, I. 2015. The implementation of Customary
Tenure Enactment (CTE) in colonial time and effects on the
administration of customary land in Negeri Sembilan (1921–1940).
Kajian Malaysia, 33(1), 67-92.
Jaafar, M. F., Idris, A., & Mat Awal, N. 2017. A stylistic analysis of
parallelism in customary sayings. Akademika, 87(1), 279-290.
Kling, Z. 1992. Political structure of adat perpatih. In N. S. L. Tan-Wong & V.
Patel (Eds.), Adat perpatih: a matrilineal system in Negeri Sembilan,
Malaysia and other matrilineal kinship systems throughout the world
(pp. 14-20). Kuaa Lumpur: Wintrac Sdn. Bhd.
Kristiansen, S., & Sulistiawati, L. 2016. Traditions, land rights, and local
welfare creation: studies from Eastern Indonesia. Bulletin of
Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 209-227.
Lee, J. 2017. Exploring the narrative of heritage through the eyes of the law.
Kajian Malaysia, 35(Supp 1), 185-207.
Lenzerini, F. 2011. Intangible cultural heritage: the living culture of peoples.
European Journal of International Law, 22(1), 101-120.
doi:10.1093/ejil/chr006
Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. 1995. Analyzing social settings: a guide to
qualitative observation and analysis (3rd ed.). Belmontt, CA:
Wadsworth.
Logan, W. S. 2007. Closing pandora's box: human rights conundrums in
cultural heritage protection. In H. Silverman & D. F. Ruggles (Eds.),
Cultural heritage and human rights (pp. 33-52). New York: Springer
New York.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. 2014. Qualitative data analysis:
a methods sourcebook (Third ed.). London: Sage.
Mohamed Ibrahim, A. 1968. Islam and contemporary law in the Malaysian
legal context. In D. C. Buxbaum (Ed.), Family law and customary law
in Asia: a contemporary legal perspective (pp. 107-144). The Hague:
Springer.
National Heritage Act. 2005.
Peletz, M. G. 1988. A share of the harvest: kinship, property and social history
among the Malays of Rembau. Berkeley: University of California
Press.
Reid, A. 1997. Endangered identity: Kadazan or Dusun in Sabah (East
Malaysia). Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 28(1), 120-136.
Saldana, J., Leavy, P., & Beretvas, N. 2011. Fundamentals of qualitative
research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Selat, N. 2014. Sistem sosial adat perpatih Selangor: PTS Akademia.
Smeets, R. 2004. Language as a vehicle of cultural heritage. Museum
International, 56(1-2), 156-165.
Tan-Wong, N. S. L. 1992. Adat perpatih: matrilineal system based on
humanity and simplicity. In N. S. L. Tan-Wong & V. Patel (Eds.),
Adat perpatih: a matrilineal system in Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia and
other matrilineal kinship systems throughout the world (pp. 7-9). Kuaa
Lumpur: Wintrac Sdn. Bhd.

6863
SUKU AS SELF-REPRESENTATION FOR THE ADAT PERPATIH COMMUNITY IN NEGERI SEMBILAN, MALAYSIA PJAEE, 18 (4) (2021)

UNESCO. 2003. Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural


heritage. Retrieved from Paris: https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention
UNESCO. 2005. Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity
of Cultural Expressions. Paper presented at the The General
Conference of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural
Organization, Paris.
Vecco, M. 2010. A definition of cultural heritage: from the tangible to the
intangible. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(3), 321-324.
doi:10.1016/j.culher.2010.01.006
Wiesenfeld, E. 1996. The concept of 'we': a community social psychology.
Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 337-345.
You, Z., & Hardwick, P. A. 2020. Guest Editors' Introduction: Intangible
Cultural Heritage in Asia: Traditions in Transition. Asian Ethnology,
79(1), 3-19.

6864

You might also like