Qualities of A Good Critic: Blesses of My Father Lakshmangiri
Qualities of A Good Critic: Blesses of My Father Lakshmangiri
Qualities of A Good Critic: Blesses of My Father Lakshmangiri
Lakshmangiri….
Hitesh L. Goswami
7/29/2017
2
Introduction
Criticism or literary criticism is the term for studies concerned with classifying, analyzing,
interpreting and evaluating the works of literature. Dryden writes in his preface to The State of
Innocence as criticism was first instituted by Aristotle and which mean to standard of judging
well today. The term literary criticism aims at the study of works of literature with emphasis on
their evaluation.
Whether or not literary criticism should be considered a separate field of inquiry from
literary theory, or is a matter of some controversy. For example, the Johns Hopkins Guide to
Literary Theory and Criticism draws no distinction between literary theory and literary
criticism, and almost always uses the terms together to describe the same concept.
Definition of Criticism
Origin of Criticism
The term “criticism” derives from the Greek word Kritikos. It means a judge of
literature. In the 2nd century, the word changed into criticus, which means the interpretation
of texts and words.
Meaning of Criticism
Criticism is the art of judging the qualities and values of an aesthetic object in literature
or in fine arts. It is the art of interpreting art. Criticism is not concerned with the interpretation
of life. It is concerned with the interpretation of life as an essay. So, literature criticism is a
systematic development of intelligent and adequate reading.
Literary criticism is the play of the mind on a work of literature. It consists in answering rational
questions about literature. Such inquiry leads to a better understanding of the nature and value
of literature.
A piece of literature implies not only a writer but also a reader. There is a voice at one
end and a listener to the other side. The critic is a listener who understands what is said to him.
A good critic should have the qualities in himself which described under:
4
The critics must be acquainted with the objects and he must have sensibility to ideas.
As Eliot says –
Impressions and experience which become important in poetry may play an important part in
man’s personality; but a critic cannot be indifferent to all these determining force. Sir Walter
Raleigh’s short biography of Shakespeare is a brilliant example of the manners in which a subtle
and imaginative critic may actually reconstruct the character of a man by studying his work.
There should be lines and expressions of the great masters in our mind.
The characters of high quality of poetry are the touch stones, by which we can measure a work
and see if it has a mark and an accent of high beauty.
Judge of the poet is only the faculty of the poets; not of all the poets but of
the best.
It appears that the work of a critic is very near akin to the creative artist.
The main difference is that the creative writer finds his subject in the same external life around
him or internal life experience. The critic finds his subject in other men’s book in the world of
literature.
Conclusion
With all these qualification, a critic can judge the work of any writer of English literature.
A critic should examine the work’s treatment, its technique, the form and the author’s attitude
of life. A critic is the voice of the reader. He works like an artist.
X
HITESH L. GOSWAMI
Arts College Lavana