Drilling Tools - 1
Drilling Tools - 1
Drilling Tools - 1
Slide 2
Whipstocks
Reamers
TurboDrills
Impact Tools
Slide 4
Exercise
What is a sidetrack?
Exit window from an existing wellbore
Retrieval Tool
Orientation System
Bypass Valve
Running Tool
Mills
Whipstock
Anchor
Slide 8
Superior Design
Nozzle
Slide 11
Wireline Surveying
Measurement-While-Drilling
Slide 13
Orientation by Gyro
Slide 16
Slide 18
Milling Assembly
Dress Mill
Follow
Lead
Mill Selection
Bi-Mill
Tri-Mill
Slide 24
Fast
Full Gauge Section Cutout
Mid-Ramp
Ramp
15° Actual
Trackmaster Slide
Profile
15°
Equivalent
Trackmaster Slide
Profile
Slide 27
Slide 29
Mechanically Set
Hydraulically Set
Expandable
Hydraulically actuated
Slide 35
Components
Consist of combination of following components
FasTrack Tri-Mill
Carbide Tri-Mill
Components cont.
Consist of combination of following components
Hydraulic Anchor
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Trackmaster Plus Whipstock 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
FasTrack Tri-Mill
Carbide Tri-Mill
Components
Consist of combination of following components
Components cont.
Consist of combination of following components
Hydraulic Anchor
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Trackmaster Plus Hard Formation Whipstock 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Components
Consist of combination of following components
FasTrack Tri-Mill
Carbide Tri-Mill
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Trackmaster Plus Flow By Whipstock System 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Components cont.
Consist of combination of following components
Expandable Anchor
Components
Consist of combination of following components
Expandable Anchor
GeoTrack Mill
Components
Consist of combination of following components:
Hydraulic Swivel
Cement Deflector
Open Hole Deflector (Non-cemented)
Inflatable Anchor
Tie-In Anchor (Non-cemented)
Components
FasTrack Bi-Mill
Expandable Anchor
Trackmaster Plus Thru Tubing
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
Whipstock
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Slide 57
Openhole?
N Thru-Tubing?
N CRA?
N Hard or
Abrasive N Flow-By N Need to
Steer
N Trackmaster
Plus Whip
Formation? Required? Rathole?
Y GeoTrack Whip
Y Y Y Y Y
Flow-By Whip
Y Special
Hard or
Abrasive N Flow-By N CRA Whip
Formation? Required? (under development)
Y Y Special
N Hard or
Abrasive
N
CRA? Formation? Thru-Tubing Whip
Y Y Special
To be
N
Openhole Deflector
Cemented?
Y
Y Cementing
Running Tool
N
N N Hard or
Abrasive Need Long
N Trackmaster Plus
Openhole? CRA? Carbide Tri-Mill
Formation? Rathole?
Y Y Y
Need to
Steer N Trackmaster Plus
FasTrack Tri-Mill
Rathole?
Y GeoTrack Mill
Need Long
Rathole?
N Hard Formation Mill
Y
May Require
Two Trips
Hard or
Abrasive
N Need Long N CRA Mill
Rathole? (under development)
Formation?
Y
Y May Require
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved. Two Trips
Anchor Selection
Well Type? Bottom?
Cementing Tailpipe
Inflatable Anchor *
Y Y Y Tie-In Anchor
N N N
To be Cemented? Flow Barrier
Attach to Fish?
Needed?
Y
N N N Flow Barrier
N Bridge
plug, low
N Hydraulic
N Trackmaster Plus *
Openhole? Thru-Tubing? Multilateral? angle & low Limitation to
Needed? Expandable Anchor
alloy casing? Set Anchor?
Y Mechanical or
Y Y Y Y Expandable Anchor
Y Trackmaster Plus *
Expandable Anchor
Contact Engineering w/Pack-off Sub
(under development)
Thru-Tubing
Expandable Anchor
* need running tool & bypass valve
Cased Hole
Cost Effective
Cased Hole
15 foot rathole
Underreamers
Slide 64
Conventional Underreamers
Rock Type (RTU)
Drilling Type (DTU)
Reamaster (XTU)
Eccentric Reamers
Stage Hole Openers (SHO)
RHINO
Bi-Centre Bits
Rhino Reamers (Eccentric)
Quad Reamers
(Eccentric)
Eccentric
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Eccentric Vs Concentric 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Eccentric
Rotation axis not geometric center
Quad-D Tools are Eccentric Drilling
Devices
Concentric
Having a common center
Advantages Disadvantages
Used on Motor Lower portion of tool must be
stabilized to drill “drill diameter”
Advantages Disadvantages
No interference fit limitation for Must be activated from surface
casing Cannot be used below restricts
No Mass Imbalance issues that are smaller then balls
Open pre-existing hole Cannot be ran with steerable
Activation of tool can be motor in sliding mode
checked
Backreaming
Applications
Medium to hard formation
Medium length intervals
Vertical & low angle holes
Cost effective underreaming a pilot hole
Open hole gravel pack completions
Accommodating special casing programs
Opening a section in preparation for sidetracking
Limitations
Non-Radial jetting of the drilling fluids may effect
performance of Cutters
Applications
Wiping out Bridges & Key Seats
Faulted zones and swelling formations
Run with a bullnose or bit underneath
UWD in certain applications
– Soft formations & Vertical Wellbores
Limitations
Smaller cone sizes may limit downhole life
Smaller hinge pin size
Maximum BHA below is 90 ft
Soft formation and Vertical Wellbores
Applications
Reduced Clearance Casing Programs
Reduces overall casing and cementing costs
High formation strength requires higher WOB
Well Economics dictates the need for higher
strength & more robust tool
UWD in a Vertical Wellbore
Limitations
Non-Reusable Arms
Temperature Rating
– Buna Nitrite 250° – 300°F (121° – 149° C)
– Viton 350° – 400°F (177° – 204° C)
Drill Diameter
Drift Diameter
Pilot Conditioning
Section Diameter*
Pilot Bit Diameter
Stage 2
Stage 1
(Pilot Bit) Stage 3
Stage 4
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Staged Hole Openers (SHO) 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Roller Cone
PDC Bits
Bull Nose
Hydraulics
Hydraulically Optimized Stage 4
Nozzles clean each stage
4 blade
Nozzles oriented up the
wellbore to minimize hole
washout
Applications
Rotary Steerable Systems
Extended Reach Drilling (ERD)
Backreaming
Highly abrasive formations
3500 series RHINOS are compatible with Thru-Tubing
Rotary Steerable Systems
Actual directional application at 10,220 ft. in GOM with an estimated daily rate of $750,000/day
Estimated customer savings of 3.4 million with simultaneous drilling & hole
enlargement
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
RHINO Reamers 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Lower Cap
Lower Mandrel
Drive Ring
Cutter Block
Spring Cover
Jet Nozzles
Drive Ring
Retainer
Spring Inner
Mandrel
Introduced 2003
Introduced 2007
Added pre-flat cutters to gauge for quicker
cut-out
More passive back rake angle on trailing
row
Opened up flow path across cutting
structure
ISB
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Generation 4 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Introduced 2010
IDEAS designed
Single Set design
(3 different blocks)
Added diamond volume on
wear exposed areas
10000 11625
Enhanced gauge stabilization
ONYX Cutter Available
8000 16000
Gauge Cutters
Shoulder
Cutters
Backreaming
Cutters
Gauge Pad
Trailing Row
Leading Row
Introduction of 3rd
Row on some
14250 Predator designs
Cutter Blocks
Worn and
broken PDC
Impact damage Reduced load on
cutters
cutters
Stabilizer/Gauge Pad
Helps reduce vibration
Stabilizer Pad /
Single
Passive Gage
Set design
Z-Drive Tongue
& Groove Actuation
For reliable block deployment
and retraction
Cutting Structure
Optimized in IDEAS to
reduce vibration
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Smoother
Cost Effective
One Run
Rig Rate: $1,000,000 per day
Cumm.
Diameter Lengt
Type/ Description Weight
(in) h (ft)
(klbm)
Roller Cone Bit 8.5 1 0.1
PD675-X5 AB 9.5 SlickCC 6.75 13.47 1.4
8.375 NM IB RT Stab 6.75 8 8
ARC-8 6.75 18 4.1
Telescope 875W/Filter 6.75 24.69 6.1
Reamer 7.25 12.5 7.4
6-3/4 NMDC 6.75 31 10.5
6-3/8 NM Spiral Stab 6.75 5 11.0
6-3/4 NMDC 6.75 31 14.1
9x5 HWDP 5 279 28.7
Hydraulic Jar 6.5 31.16 30.3
11x5 HWDP 5 341 48.2
5" 19.5 DPS 4.92 7004 212.1
5"25.6 DPS 4.92 9200
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
461.6
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Application # 2 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Cost Effective
Rig Rate: $25,000 per day
Interval Length of 1,500 ft existing hole
Formation: Medium UCS with High UCS stringers
– Needs the ability to use High WOB through stringers
Vertical Hole
Cost Sensitive
Vertical Wellbore
TurboDrills
Slide 123
What is a turbine?
WWII era steam turbine used for ship propulsion A turbine is a rotary engine
that extracts (converts)
mechanical energy from fluid
flow (hydraulic energy).
Pressure = Power =
ROP
Mk#1 Blades
Constant Press. Drop
with variable RPM
Mk#2 Blades
Pressure Profile –
drops with lower RPM
Mk#3 Blades
Hi-PressureProfile -
drops with lower RPM
Lower Bearing Section Turbine Power Section #1 Turbine Power Section #2 Turbine Power Section #3
Lower Bearing Section Turbine Power Section #1 Turbine Power Section #2 Turbine Power Section #3
Radial
Bearings
Labyrinths
Drive Shaft
Thrust
Bearings
Pin-Ended Shaft
T3-BSA Mk1
BSA Mk1
Hole T3
T2 Mk1
Straight-Hole T2-BSA
Straight-Hole
Steerable FBS-T2
Power
T1 T2 T3
Section (1xPowerSection (2xPowerSection (3xPowerSection
with 75stages) with 172stages) with 247 stages)
Blade Config.
Constant Pressure
RPM=1172 RPM=1172 RPM=1172
Mk1
Torq=937ftlbs Torq=2595ftlbs Torq=3615ftlbs
Torque at Bit
Mud Wieght
Pressure Profile
RPM=1000 RPM=1000 RPM=1000
Mk2
Torq=1463ftlbs Torq=2965ftlbs Torq=2276ftlbs
Hp = 153 Hp = 310 Hp = 433
Hi-Pressure Profile
USED IN UNDERBALANCED OPERATIONS
Mk3 RPM=1452 RPM=1452 RPM=1452
Torq=2070ftlbs Torq=4446ftlbs Torq=6303ftlbs
Hp = 315
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved. Hp = 676 Hp = 958
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Impreg Application Window(s) 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
KGR50 Application Window KGR55 Application Window KGR70 Application Window KGR48 Application Window
35000 35000 35000 35000
30787 30804 33046
30000 30000 30000 30000
3879 3149
0 0 © 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
0 0
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Turbodrill PDC Application Window 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
20000
Average UCCS / Run
10000 9936
5000
N=413
25000
23636
30000 15000
10000 9936
25000
23636
Average UCCS / Run
5000
17261
15000 14925
11392
10000 9748 9728
8894
5000
2512
N=107 N=103 N=128 N=75
476 476 691
0
Carbonate Sandstone Shale Evaporite
275
250
225
Drive Power (Hp)
200
175
y = 161.58x
150 2
R = 0.2872
125
y = 42.136x
100 2 PDM
R = 0.2374
T1 Turbine
75
Linear (PDM)
25
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
160%
170%
180%
190%
200%
210%
220%
230%
240%
250%
R.O.P.% Gain / Loss Against Offset
275
y = 69.963x + 119.35
250 2
R = 0.523
225
Drive Power (Hp)
200
175
y = 161.58x
150 2 Sst-Sh Sst-Sh
R = 0.2872
Av.15kPSiUCCS Av.14kPSiUCCS
125
Wy, USA.
y = 42.136x Ok,
PDM
USA.
100 2 T1 Turbine
R = 0.2374
T2 Turbine
75
Linear (PDM)
Linear (T1 Turbine)
50
Linear (T2 Turbine)
25
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
160%
170%
180%
190%
200%
210%
220%
230%
240%
250%
R.O.P.% Gain / Loss Against Offset
•PDM(S/S)+PDC(MA32) •Rotary+R/B(517X)
•242ft @ 2.3ft/hr ($1753/ft) •178ft @ 2.9ft/hr ($1509/ft)
•1-2-WT dull POOH for DMF •4-6-BT dull POOH for HRS
•380-400degF bottom hole temperature •Major torque problems & casing wear
Bp-America requirements:-
•Increase tool reliability below 19000ftMD in heavy OBM
•Minimize tripping (42hrs round trip from 22000ftMD in hot hole)
•Reduce casing wear
•Minimize risk of drill string failure
•Improve ROP without limiting on-bottom drilling time
275
y = 69.963x + 119.35
250
145% improvement against offset (lo-risk) 2
R = 0.523
225
~47% chance (hi-risk) of
Drive Power (Hp)
200
165-210% improvement
175
y = 161.58x Turbine 165hp=100%
150 2
R = 0.2872
125
y = 42.136x PDM
100 2 T1 Turbine
R = 0.2374
T2 Turbine
75 PDM 65hp=100% Linear (PDM)
Linear (T1 Turbine)
50
Linear (T2 Turbine)
25
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
160%
170%
180%
190%
200%
210%
220%
230%
240%
250%
© 2010 Schlumberger.
R.O.P.% All rights
Gain reserved.
/ Loss Against Offset
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Case Study - K503CTPX + Hi-Power Turbine Performance 3. TurboDrills
Expectations 4. Drilling Jars
(Bellelo-1, False River Bp-America
Field, Louisiana, USA)
Benchmarks & Concerns
•PDM(S/S)+PDC(MA32)
•242ft @ 2.3ft/hr ($1753/ft)
•1-2-WT dull POOH for DMF
•380-400degF bottom hole temperature
Bp-America requirements:-
•Increase tool reliability below 19000ftMD in heavy OBM
•Minimize tripping (42hrs round trip from 22000ftMD in hot hole)
•Reduce casing wear
•Minimize risk of drill string failure
•Improve ROP without limiting on-bottom drilling time
•Hi-powered turbine (no temp limitations, extreme reliability)
•074 T3-BSA Mk1 blades 246 stages = 220hp
(@ 350gpm, 17ppg OBM @ 22000ftMD)
•084 KGR50BCTPX (ER#20153)
- ported hydraulics for shale drilling
- 25/30 diamonds (rel.large) for softer formations
200
7.9ft/hr@206hp
175 (780RPM+1519ftlbs)
y = 161.58x
150 2
R = 0.2872
125
y = 42.136x PDM
100 2 T1 Turbine
R = 0.2374
Haley#30-1
75 Benchmark T2 Turbine
Strawn@6.6ft/hr Linear (PDM)
Linear (T1 Turbine)
50 ≡ T3@183Hp
Linear (T2 Turbine)
25
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
110%
120%
130%
140%
150%
160%
170%
180%
190%
200%
210%
220%
230%
240%
250%
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
R.O.P.% Gain / Loss Against Offset
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Turbodrill Advantages 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Downside?:
Toolpusher (NAm) after turbine was 16 days on-bottom:
“The only problem with running these turbines is that the rig hands are getting fat and lazy!” ☺
Assembly
Rotor
LaserCarb™
coating
(Sleeve) PDC Thrust Bearings (High
Temperature)
N N
270° 90°
270° 90°
AZIMUTH AZIMUTH
180°
Fluctuating 180°
Torque ON BOTTOM
4.6 Ft *
LONG GAUGE NEAR BIT BOX-END LOWER BEARING
PIN CONNECTION. STABILISER. SHAFT STABILISER
PROBLEMATIC AREA:
ROTATING & UN-STABILISED LOWER BEARING
STABILISER
2.2Ft*
SHORT GAUGE BIT BOX LOWER BEARING
PIN CONNECTION STABILISER STABILISER
1.4Ft*
BOX-UP LOWER BEARING
LONG GAUGE BIT. STABILISER
DLS rates can vary dependent on hole size, stabilization, inclination, formation & bit.
( * : Figures quoted have been comfortably sustained – figures “X” are max recorded)
NFA-2
WEST
6000
‘phenomenon’
NFA-11
NFA-3
4000 Generally, the LHW will be
on average less than
NFA-10 NFA-6 2000 1°/30m. Formation trends
will have an effect on this
NFA-9
0.00 figure.
NFA-13
-2000 •Probable cause of LHW tendency? –
NFA-16
NFA-8
•Reaction to drilling momentum
-4000 (speed/power/clockwise motion)
NFA-17
NFA-18
NFA-7 •Lower Bearing Clearance
NFA-4
-6000
•Possible factors affecting LHW tendency? –
-6000 -4000 -2000 0.00 2000 4000 6000
•Aggressive Gauge protection
NORTH FIELD
LONG GAUGE SURFACEBOX
NEAR BIT
PIN CONNECTION. STABILISER.
PLAN VIEW BEARING
ENDBOTTOM
SHAFT STABILISER
•Formation
•String Rotation
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
Steerability – Performance Sliding V’s Rotating
S liding V 's R otating R .O.P .'s
250
200
R . O . P . (F t/ h r)
150
100
50
0
10 35
10 40
10 45
10 50
10 55
10 60
10 65
10 70
10 75
10 80
10 5
10 90
11 95
11 00
11 05
11 10
11 15
0
98
02
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
0
0
0
0
10
De pth (Ft)
Sample Job:
IN98003 – Mobil Oil Indonesia
4-3/4” FBS-T2-Mk2 (1.25°)
Sample orientation showing ROPsliding vs ROProtary
5-5/8” Hole, PDC bit (long gauge)
performance for both sides of the slide
UBD Well - up to 85% gas through Turbodrill
“Superb steering & performance”
Results with
Turbine?:-
• No reported cutter
damage in Turbine-run
bit grading.
• WOB increased with no
increase in shocks. TURBINE
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Turbodrill Advantages 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Fast rotation forces the lock to a The lock engages between shaft
‘neutral’ position and body when the shaft stops and
the body rotates
Features Benefits
High Power Output Capability Maximise ROP
All Metallic Construction Reliability with no Heat Constraints
Different Blade Types Adaptability to suit the Application
Modular Units (Bearings/Motors/Stabs) Rig-Site Interchangeable
Interchangeable “mid-point” Stabiliser Predictable Rotary Trends
Pin-Ended Shafts - Box-Up Bits Proven Hole Quality / Steerability
Bit Choice to suit Formation Not the Motor Minimal trade off in sliding ROP
Exceptionally Low Vibration Levels Protects Bit, BHA, MWD etc.
Drilling Jars
Slide 189
Theory
Sup-R-Jar
Hydra Jar
Accelerator
Running Procedures
Placement
=
Slide 193
Energy = ½ MV2
M = Mass (Hammer)
Slide 194
Slide 195
What is Impact?
– Energy created when hammer hits anvil
What is Impulse?
– Duration of the shock waves traveling through the pipe
Slide 196
700
IMPAC
Impact 600
T
Hevi-Wate
Drill Collars
Hydra-Jar
Sup-R-Jar
Slide 199
Firing Downward
Impact
30-60 sec. Delay time
Upper Flex
Oil through Connector Sub Knocker Joint
restriction
Detent
Mandrel
Firing Upward
Hydra-Jar
Slide 206
Fully Hydraulic
Double Acting
Different Wellbore Application
Vertical, Directional & Horizontal Drilling
Coring
Fishing & Remedial
Slide 210
Neutralizer Mandrel
Drive pin retainer sub
Connector Sub Lower Detent Mandrel
Fluid Cylinder Neutralizer
Cylinder Lower Sub
Kelly Mandrel Upper Detent Mandrel
Slide 211
Detent System
Slide 212
100°F 500°F
Hole in Ring
Steel Pin
Slide 213
Slide 214
Balance Piston
Mud Slot
Slide 216
Accelerators
Slide 217
Slide 218
Slide 219
Slide 220
Slide 221
Slide 222
Accelerator AP Tools
Hydra-Jar
Stuck Point
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Accelerator Tool Closes Loop 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Accelerator AP Tools
Initial Wave
Stuck Point
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Accelerator Tool Closes Loop 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Accelerator AP Tools
Initial Wave
Stuck Point
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Accelerator Tool Closes Loop 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Initial Wave
Stuck Point
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Accelerator Tool Closes Loop 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Stuck Point
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Accelerator Tool Closes Loop 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Stuck Point
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Placement
Slide 229
Buoyancy Factor
Enough DC/HWDP below Jar for WOB
Neutral Point
Number of Joints from Neutral Point
Safety Factor
Number of Joints for Safety Factor
Number of Joints left for Optimization
Optimize for Impact or Impulse
1
BF = 1 - MW ⋅
ρ
Where:
BF = Buoyancy Factor
MW = Drilling Fluid Weight (Weight/Volume)
ρ = Density of HWDP/DC Material
(Weight/ Volume)
wt
wt BelowJars = ∑ ⋅ l ⋅ BF
ft
Jar is present:
If wtBelowJars > WOBDesired
– Jar will be in Tension, determine # Joints of DC/HWDP to Neutral
Point
If If wtBelowJars < WOBDesired
– Jar will be in Compression, need to factor wt/ft of jar for WOBDesired
Jar is not present:
Determine if enough weight of tool is present for Desired WOB
wt
WOBDesired − ∑ ⋅ l ⋅ BF ⋅ cosθ
ft MiscTool
NP/lDC/HWDP =
wt
ft ⋅ BF ⋅ cosθ
DC / HWDP
Where:
NP = Neutral Point
WOBDesired = Weight on Bit Desired to Drill
θ = Inclination
lDC/HWDP
# Jnts WOB =
l AvgDC / HWDP
DC use lAve = 30 ft
HWDP use lAve = 31 ft
wt SF = WOBDesired ⋅ 20%
Where:
wtSF = Weight of pipe for Safety Factor
wt SF
lSF =
wt
ft ⋅ BF ⋅ cosθ
DC / HWDP
Where:
lSF = Length of DC/HWDP needed for Safety
Factor
lDC/HWDP
# JntsSF =
l AvgDC / HWDP
DC lAve = 30 ft
HWDP use lAve = 31 ft
lDC/HWDPTotal
# Jnts Opt = −# Jnts WOB −# JntsSF
l
AvgDC / HWDP
wt Above Jar
lAbove Jar =
wt
ft ⋅ BF ⋅ cosθ
DC / HWDP
lAbove Jar
# Jnts Above Jar =
l AvgDC / HWDP
DC lAve = 30 ft
HWDP use lAve = 31 ft
BHA
OD (in) ID (in) Wt/ft Length (ft)
Components
Bit 7-7/8
Motor 6-3/4 101 30
MWD 6-1/2 2-1/2 88 30
LWD 6-1/2 2-1/2 88 30
HWDP 4-1/2 2-3/4 42 806
Slide 245 DP 4-1/2 16.6
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
1. Whipstocks
2. Underreamers
Determining Optimal Jar Placement 3. TurboDrills
4. Drilling Jars
Buoyancy Factor
Enough DC/HWDP below Jar for WOB
Neutral Point
Number of Joints from Neutral Point
Safety Factor
Number of Joints for Safety Factor
Number of Joints left for Optimization
1
BF = 1 - MW ⋅
ρ
1
BF = 1 - 12.7 ⋅
65.44
BF = 0.8059
Slide 247
wt
wtTotal = ∑ ⋅ l ⋅ BF
ft
wtTotal = [(30 ⋅101) + (30 ⋅ 88) + (30 ⋅ 88) + (806 ⋅ 42)]⋅ 0.8059
wtTotal = 33,978lb
wtTotal > WOBDesired
NP/lHWDP = 393.11 ft
Slide 249
lHWDP
# Jnts WOB =
l AvgHWDP
393.11
# Jnts WOB =
31
# Jnts WOB = 13 Rounded
Slide 250
wt SF = WOBDesired ⋅ 20%
wt SF = 20,000 ⋅ 20%
wt SF = 4,000lb
Slide 251
wt SF
lSF =
wt
ft ⋅ BF ⋅ cosθ
DC / HWDP
4,000
lSF =
[42 ⋅ 0.8059 ⋅ cos0]
lSF = 118.18 ft
Slide 252
lDC/HWDP
# JntsSF =
l AvgDC / HWDP
118.18
# Jnts SF =
31
# Jnts SF = 4 Rounded
Slide 253
lDC/HWDPTotal
# Jnts Opt = −# Jnts WOB −# Jnts SF − 3
l
AvgDC / HWDP
806
# Jnts Opt = − 14 − 4 − 3
31
# Jnts Opt = 5
Slide 254
lAbove Jar
# Jnts Above Jar =
l AvgDC / HWDP
236.4
# Jnts Above Jar =
31
# Jnts Above Jar = 8 Rounded
Slide 259
6 Options
Single Jar placed in Horizontal
Single Jar Placed in Vertical
Single Jar placed in Vertical with Accelerator
Dual Jars
– One in Vertical, one in Horizontal
Dual Jars with Accelerator in vertical
Dual Jars each with Accelerators
Advantage
– Reduces problems of
getting weight/ overpull to
jar
Disadvantage
– Majority to time stuck near
bit in horizontal section
– Jar too far from stuck point
Top Jar
– Good impact in curve
section
– Assist in cocking lower jar
Bottom Jar
– Transmit high impact
through horizontal
At least 1,000 ft between
jars
Situation 1
– String becomes stuck with bit at bottom
Situation 2
– String becomes stuck while pulling out
Jar Situation
– Lower drilling jar is closed and in compression
– Upper drilling jar is open and in tension
Apply Overpull to lower drilling jar
If jar fires:
– Slack off weight, pick up and continue jarring
If jar fails to fire:
– Slack off more weight, enough to cock top jar
– Ably overpull to fire top jar until lower jar activates
© 2010 Schlumberger. All rights reserved.
Situation 2-String Becomes Stuck While Pulling Out
Jar Situation
– Lower Drilling Jar is on tension
Upper Drilling Jar fully opened
– Jar down by slacking off allow time for bottom jar to fire
If jar does not fire:
– Slack off more weight to activate top drilling jar
– Allow 30-40 seconds to pass and pick up to activate bottom
drilling jar
– If bottom jar still does not fire repeat until it does