Ramponi 2018
Ramponi 2018
Ramponi 2018
Imaging
Column Editor: Denise R. Ramponi, DNP, FNP-C, ENP-BC, FAEN, FAANP, CEN
Pneumoperitoneum
Denise R. Ramponi, DNP, FNP-C, ENP-BC, FAEN, FAANP, CEN
Abstract
Pneumoperitoneum, usually seen as free air under the diaphragm, is a finding that can be seen on
plain abdominal radiographs, signifying a leakage of air, usually from a perforation in the gastroin-
testinal tract. There are several other potential pathways from other body compartments for air to
enter the abdominal cavity. Pneumoperitoneum does not always signify bowel rupture, as it can also
result from pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax, and in patients who are being mechanically
ventilated. Patient history and physical examination can assist in a preliminary diagnosis before di-
agnostic imaging. Plain chest/abdominal radiograph or computed tomographic scan of the abdomen
can be diagnostic of pneumoperitoneum. Surgical versus nonsurgical conservative observation is
determined on the basis of the cause and amount of free air. Key words: abdominal free air, benign
pneumoperitoneum, free air under diaphragm, intraperitoneal air, mottled air sign, pneumomedi-
astinum, pneumoperitoneum, retroperitoneal air, Rigler’s sign, tension pneumoperitoneum
87
Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
88 Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal
can include abdominal distention, soft ab- peritonitis, therefore requiring aggressive sur-
domen, but no signs of peritonitis or abdom- gical intervention to remove any intraperi-
inal wall redness. Patients with pneumoperi- toneal barium. Pneumoperitoneum can also
toneum that extends to pneumomediastinum be found on imaging for 7 days after an
often display dyspnea, chest, and neck pain, abdominal surgical procedure, including la-
with subcutaneous emphysema in the cervi- paroscopy, and may last for up to 4 weeks
cal and neck soft tissues. Patients with hol- (Gayer et al., 2000).
low viscus perforation have decreased or no Pneumatic enema is often used for ileo-
bowel sounds, signs of peritonitis, and often cecal intussusception reduction. An adverse
progresses to redness and swelling of the ab- sequela of tension pneumoperitoneum
dominal wall. can occur following this procedure when
Tension pneumoperitoneum occurs in pa- excessive air is insufflated into the rectum
tients when free intra-abdominal gas is un- to reduce the intussusception, causing a
der pressure, compromising blood flow and perforation leading to pneumoperitoneum.
visceral function. This massive accumulation Intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal free air can
of air pressure compresses the inferior vena have respiratory-associated causes such as
cava, resulting in decreased venous return mechanical ventilation-induced barotrauma,
and reduced cardiac output. These patients bronchial asthma, and pneumothorax
often have severe abdominal pain, abdominal through pleural and diaphragmatic defects.
tenderness, and abdominal distension. When Incidence of ventilation-induced pneu-
severe, patients may present with dyspnea, moperitoneum is estimated at 7% (Henry,
venous congestion signs such as skin mot- Ali, Banks, & Dais, 1986). It has also been
tling or edema, and signs of aortic occlusion noted that there is an open access between
such as loss of peripheral pulses in the lower the vagina and the abdomen. Pneumoperi-
extremities. toneum can result from pelvic manipulation
or insufflation, and sexual intercourse. More
than 90% of pneumoperitoneum are caused
CAUSES
by visceral perforation (Duan et al., 2017).
Pneumoperitoneum often results from a per- Perforated viscus can include perforation
foration in the GI tract, such as a ruptured from peptic ulcer, stomach, small intestine, or
hollow viscus. Once the diagnosis of pneu- colon.
moperitoneum is made, a search for the
source is needed. Perforation of the GI tract
BODY COMPARTMENTS
can occur following colonoscopy, barium en-
ema, or percutaneous endoscopic gastros- There are various potential pathways for air
tomy tube placement. Mayo Clinic (Farley movement along the fascial planes of the
et al., 1997) estimated large bowel perforation body from one compartment to the next.
at 0.075% incidence following colonoscopy in The compartments of the body are anatom-
a retrospective study of 57,028 colonoscopy ically connected, allowing air movement via
procedures. Patients at higher risk of perfora- the fascial planes with differences in pres-
tion include those with diverticulosis, rectal sure (see Figure 1). Air can spread from one
disease, cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, compartment to the adjacent compartment
or stricture. Crohn’s disease has an incidence via an opening and a pressure gradient (see
of 1% perforation of the small bowel and is Figure 2). Air can dissect from the medi-
the most common cause of small bowel per- astinum into the soft tissues of the neck, re-
foration in the Western world (Greenstein, sulting in subcutaneous emphysema in the
Mann, Sachar, & Aufses, 1985; Greenstein soft tissues. Air can dissect through the pleu-
et al., 1987). Barium sulfate leakage into the ral space in the chest cavity into the abdomen
peritoneum can cause a progressive lethal with defects in the diaphragm. Air can dissect
Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
April–June 2018 r Vol. 40, No. 2 Pneumoperitoneum 89
RADIOGRAPHIC STUDIES
One of the most common findings of pneu-
moperitoneum on a plain radiograph, such
as kidneys, ureters, and bladder (KUB) film
of pneumoperitoneum, is free air under the
Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
90 Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal
Figure 4. Pneumoperitoneum. Upright chest ra- Figure 5. Clear definition of both the inner and
diograph shows a large collection of air under outer walls of the bowel—Rigler’s sign. From
both hemidiaphragms due to perforated duodenal “Acute Onset of Abdominal Pain in a 76-Year-
ulcer. From Pneumoperitoneum Imaging, by A. Old Man,” by G. Dehadrai, 2017, Medscape.
N. Khan and M. Chandramohan, 2016, Medscape. Retrieved from https://reference.medscape.com/
Retrieved from https://emedicine.medscape.com/ viewarticle/727508. Used with permission.
article/372053-overview. Used with permission.
tomography (CT) has a higher sensitivity of
Perforations to retroperitoneal hollow orga- 92% compared with 74% for plain radiography
ns can also cause free air in the retroperitoneal for the presence of free intraperitoneal air
space. Organs in the retroperitoneal space (Catalano, 1996). A CT scan with oral con-
include a portion of the esophagus, the trast provides opacity of the bowel lumen to
duodenum, ascending and descending identify a bowel leak in the GI tract. Perfora-
colon, rectum, and the urinary tract system. tions in the distal small bowel or large bowel
Retroperitoneal infections, such as emphy- can take several hours before the oral contrast
sematous pyelonephritis, can produce gas in opacifies the bowel lumen. This time lapse
the retroperitoneal space, creating a “mottled can be difficult, particularly in a very ill pa-
air sign” demonstrated by a cluster of small tient. A CT scan utilizes radiation and is more
numerous air bubbles on plain abdominal expensive than plain radiographs and ultra-
radiograph (Wang, Wang, Chow, Chiu, & sound scan. Sensitivity of a CT scan has much
Yang, 2004; Yokomuro et al., 2004). Free lower ranges from 33% to 94% in identifying
air in the retroperitoneal space is character- small bowel perforations (Grassi, Pinto, Rossi,
istically seen by a thread like radiolucency & Rotondo, 1998; Scherck, Shatney, Sensaki,
surrounding the perforated organ (Yokomuro & Selivanov, 1994). The small bowel is of-
et al., 2004). ten collapsed; thus, it does not contain much
air or liquid, which makes CT scan diagnosis
of small bowel perforation more difficult. A
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
CT scan with oral contrast has a 100% sen-
Despite plain radiographs often providing the sitivity for perforations of the lower GI tract
diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum, computed including the stomach, duodenum, and colon
Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
April–June 2018 r Vol. 40, No. 2 Pneumoperitoneum 91
Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
92 Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal
Figure 8. Pneumoperitoneum. Nonenhanced axial computed tomographic scan through the tip of the liver
shows leakage of oral contrast material (arrows) from a perforated gastric ulcer. From Pneumoperitoneum
Imaging, by A. N. Khan and M. Chandramohan, 2016, Medscape. Retrieved from https://emedicine.
medscape.com/article/372053-overview. Used with permission.
mild symptoms (Pollard & Entzian, 2005). sources including laparoscopy, gas-forming
The majority of nonsurgical pneumoperi- bacterial infection, and sexual intercourse.
toneum are caused by mechanical ventilation The patient’s history of conditions such as gas-
(Mularski, Sippel, & Osborne, 2000). These tric or duodenal ulcer, irritable bowel disease,
patients are intubated and often have multiple diverticulitis, or recent surgery can make the
comorbidities, including immunosuppression patient at higher risk for pneumoperitoneum.
and high-dose steroid use. This can lead to Patient symptoms can range from abdominal
peritonitis and sepsis. Those patients should distention with decreased bowel sounds to
be admitted to the hospital, ordered bowel severe abdominal pain, lower extremity mot-
rest, intravenous fluids, intravenous antibi- tling, and loss of pulses. Pneumoperitoneum
otics, and close observation. These patients can be diagnosed on plain KUB or lateral decu-
should be monitored for changes in vital signs, bitus radiographs with the finding of free air
leukocytosis, and return of bowel function in the abdomen. Oral contrast CT scan is the
and resolution of abdominal pain. primary diagnostic tool to determine whether
surgery is necessary. It may take several hours
Surgical Intervention for the contrast to enter the distal small bowel
and large intestine if that is the area of bowel
When CT scan with oral contrast demon-
perforation Mechanical ventilation is the most
strates extravasation of contrast, operative in-
common cause of nonsurgical pneumoperi-
tervention is indicated and surgery should be
toneum. Surgical consult is often necessary as
urgently consulted.
operative intervention is indicated in 85%–
95% of pneumoperitoneum cases (Mularski
CONCLUSION et al., 2000).
Pneumoperitoneum is often caused by a rup-
tured hollow viscus that can occur anywhere REFERENCES
in the lower GI tract, but it is not always Catalano, O. (1996). Computed tomography in the study
caused by bowel perforation. Air in the peri- of gastrointestinal perforation. La Radiologia Med-
toneal space can result from a variety of ica, 91(3), 247–252.
Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
April–June 2018 r Vol. 40, No. 2 Pneumoperitoneum 93
Dehadrai, G. (2017). Acute onset of abdominal pain in moperitoneum associated with mechanical ventila-
a 76-year-old man. Medscape. Retrieved from https: tion. Journal of the National Medical Association,
//reference.medscape.com/viewarticle/727508 78, 539–541.
Duan, S. X., Sun, Z. B., Wang, G. H., Zhong, J., Ou, W. Khan, A. N., & Chandramohan, M. (2016). Pneumoperi-
H., Fu, M. X., . . . Li, J. H. (2017). Diagnosis and treat- toneum imaging. Medscape. Retrieved from https://
ment of pediatric benign pneumoperitoneum: A case emedicine.medscape.com/article/372053-overview
report series of 9 patients. Medicine, 96(2), e5814. Mularski, R. A, Sippel, J. M., & Osborne, M. L. (2000).
Farley, D. R., Bannon, M. P, Zietlow, S. P, Pemberton, Pneumoperitoneum: A review of nonsurgical causes.
J. H., Ilstrup, D. M., & Larson, D. R. (1997). Man- Critical Care Medicine, 28, 2638–2644.
agement of colonoscopic perforations. Mayo Clinic Nurnberg, D., Mauch, M., Spengler, J., Holle, A., Pan-
Proceedings, 72(8), 729–733. nwitz, H., & Seitz, K. (2007). [Sonographical diagno-
Gayer, G., Jonas, T., Apter, S., Amitai, M., Shabtai, M., & sis of pneumoretroperitoneum as a result of retroperi-
Hertz, M. (2000). Postoperative pneumoperitoneum toneal perforation]. Ultraschall in der Medizin,
as detected by CT: Prevalence, duration, and relevant 28(6), 612–621.
factors affecting its possible significance. Abdominal Pollard, D. B., & Entzian, D. (2005). Case summary: Radio-
Imaging, 25(3), 301–305. logical case of the month. Applied Radiology, 38–41.
Goudie, A. (2013). Detection of intraperitoneal free Scherck, J., Shatney, C., Sensaki, K., & Selivanov, V.
gas by ultrasound. Australasian Journal of Ultra- (1994). The accuracy of computed tomography in
sound Medicine, 16(2), 56–61. doi:10.1002/j.2205- the diagnosis of blunt small-bowel perforation. Amer-
0140.2013.tb00166.x ican Journal of Surgery, 168, 670–675.
Grassi, R., Pinto, A., Rossi, G., & Rotondo, A. (1998). Con- Stanford, R. E., McGonigal, M. D., & Weigelt, J. A. (1999).
ventional plain-film radiology, ultrasonography and Oral contrast solution and computed tomography
CT in jejuno-ileal perforation. Acta Radiologica, 39, for blunt abdominal trauma: A randomized study.
52–56. Archives of Surgery, 134(6), 622–626.
Greenstein, A. J., Mann, D., Sachar, D. B., & Aufses, A. Wang, Y. C., Wang, J. M., Chow, Y. C., Chiu, A. W., &
H., Jr. (1985). Free perforation in Crohn’s disease: A Yang, S. (2004). Pneumomediastinum and subcuta-
survey of 99 cases. The American Journal of Gas- neous emphysema as the manifestation of emphy-
troenterology, 80, 682–689. sematous pyelonephritis. International Journal of
Greenstein, A. J., Sachar, D. B, Mann, D., Lachman, P., Urology, 11(10), 909–911.
Heimann, T., & Aufses, A. H. (1987). Spontaneous Yokomuro, S., Uchida, E., Arima, Y., Mizuguchi, Y.,
free perforation and perforated abscess in 30 patients Shimizu, T., Kawahigashi, Y., . . . Tajiri, T. (2004).
with Crohn’s disease. Annals of Surgery, 205(1), 72– Simple closure of a perforated duodenal diverticu-
76. lum: “A case report.” Journal of Nippon Medical
Henry, R. E., Ali, N., Banks, T., & Dais, K. A. (1986). Pneu- School, 71(5), 337–339.
Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.