Target Costing: Concept and Principles
Target Costing: Concept and Principles
Target Costing: Concept and Principles
Working backward from the sales price, companies establish an acceptable target profit and
calculate the target cost as follows:
Target Cost = Expected selling price – Desired profit
Target Costing is different from standard costing. While target costs are determined by
market driven standards (target sales price – target profit = target cost), standard costs
are determined by design – driven standards with less emphasis on what the market
will pay (engineered costs + desired markup = desired sales price).
The target cost is normally less than the current cost. Thus, managers must try to reduce
costs from the design and manufacture of the product. The planned cost reduction is
sometimes referred to as the cost “drift.”
To reduce the costs in target costing, the following analysis needs to be made. (i) reverse
engineering (ii) value analysis, and (iii) process improvement. Reverse engineering tears
down the competitor’s products with the objective of discovering more design features
that create cost reductions. Value analysis attempts to assess the value placed on
various product functions by customers. If the price customers are willing to pay for a
particular function is less than its cost, the function is a candidate for elimination.
Another possibility is to find ways to reduce cost of providing the function, e.g. using
common components. Both reverse engineering and value analysis focus on product
design to achieve cost reductions. The processes used to produce and market the
product are also sources of potential cost reduction. Thus, redesigning processes to
improve their efficiency can also contribute to achieving the needed cost reductions.
According to Hilton, target costing involves seven key principles listed as follows:
1. Price-Led Costing:
Target costing sets the target cost by first determining the price at which a product can
be sold in the marketplace. Subtracting the target profit margin from this target price
yields the target cost, that is, the cost at which the product must be manufactured.
Notice that in a target costing approach, the price is set first, and then the target product
cost is determined. This is opposite from the order in which the product cost and selling
price are determined under traditional cost-plus pricing.
5. Cross-Functional Teams:
Manufacturing a product at or below its target cost requires the involvement of people
from many different functions in an organisation: market research, sales, design
engineering, procurement, production engineering, production scheduling, material
handling and cost management. Individuals from all these diverse areas of expertise
can make key contributions to the target costing process. Moreover, a cross-functional
team is not a set of specialists who contribute their expertise and then leave; they are
responsible for the entire product.
6. Life-Cycle Costs:
In specifying a product’s target cost, analysts must be careful to incorporate all of the
product’s life-cycle costs. These include the costs of product planning and concept
design, preliminary design, detailed design and testing, production, distribution and
customer service. Traditional cost-accounting systems have tended to focus only on the
production phase and have not paid enough attention to the product’s other life-cycle
costs.
7. Value-Chain Orientation:
Sometimes the projected cost of a new product is above the target cost. Then efforts are
made to eliminate non-value-added costs to bring the projected cost down. In some
cases, a close look at the company’s entire value chain can help managers identify
opportunities for cost reduction.
Target costing is a common practice in Japan where markets are extremely competitive.
The market determines the price of products and there is a little opportunity for the
individual organisations to set prices. Therefore, controlling cost is extremely
important.