Everyday Life of Slum Children: A Case Study From Education Perspective
Everyday Life of Slum Children: A Case Study From Education Perspective
Everyday Life of Slum Children: A Case Study From Education Perspective
Aditi Deshpande1
1
Symbiosis Institute of Design, Symbiosis International (Deemed University) Pune, Maharashtra, India.
1
aditi.deshpande@sid.edu.in
Abstract
Every year, the city of Pune attracts migrant workers due to urbanization, and these migrants form
residential pockets called slums. Today, around 40% of Pune's population lives in urban slums,
around 11% of children, who have little or no access to education with the everyday hand-to-mouth
struggle for survival. This study explores the lives of slum children and their educational conditions.
Three case studies were conducted with three slums from uptown areas of Pune. Focus group
discussions, interviews, and visual survey methods were employed, leading to qualitative analysis.
Analysis threw light on the everyday challenges faced by slum children in accessing education. The
visual studies imply the need for architectural intervention. The findings also suggest policy
implications towards the provision of education towards the betterment of the lives of slum children.
Working and learning are the two social processes; without breaking the legal structures on child
labor, children working within the home as domestic labor or in the household enterprise is a
common occurrence in urban centers, particularly among those who are household income is derived
from the informal sector and who have lower income levels. Working modes and times differ
depending on the situation. Owing to the size of India's informal economy and attempts to reduce
child labor trafficking, a strong emphasis has been placed on developing and implementing social
policies that address child labor.
Key-words: Slum Children, Education, Learning Center, Case Study, Working and Learning.
1. Introduction
Pune is the second-largest city in the state of Maharashtra, after Mumbai. It is a tier 2 city and
home for large industrial and educational organizations. 40% of its population lives in the slums. The
migrants contribute most of this urban slum population from rural areas of Maharashtra and other
neighboring states moving to the city searching for work and better living conditions [2]. The most
vulnerable section of these slums is children. These children are deprived of basic living conditions
2. Background
A slum household is a group of individuals living under the same roof in an urban area who
lack one or more of the following: inadequate access to safe water, poor structural quality of housing,
insecurity, inadequate access to sanitation and infrastructure [1].
A Slum, for Census, has been defined as residential areas where dwellings are unfit for human
habitation by reasons of dilapidation, overcrowding, faulty arrangements and design of such
buildings, narrowness or faulty arrangement of the street, lack of ventilation, light, or sanitation
facilities or any combination of these factors, which are detrimental to the safety and health [2].
According to Pune census data, 10.79% of the child population lives in slums, and the literacy
rate among these children is 81.73%. Moreover, out of every 100 children, only 32 children finish
their age-appropriate school education [4]. Among the major factors affecting the education of slum
children are poverty, lack of educational facilities, space constraints in slums, migration of parents,
and child labor [10].
For this research, a Case Study methodology was employed [11]. This research comprised
three cases of slums from the uptown areas of Koregaon Park (slum 1), Kalyani Nagar (slum 2), and
4. Data Collection
Primary data was collected at each slum over weekdays and weekends to understand the
children's routine. The interviews were informal and open-ended and were conducted in local
languages - Marathi and Hindi. The study was conducted in January 2019 over two weeks.
For analysis of interviews, open coding was done. Table 2 shows different information
patterns that emerged in the studies in all three slums.
Slum 1: This slum houses migrants from Gulbarga, a town in Karnataka, and most of them
work on construction sites. The children living here were enrolled in the nearby government schools.
They attended the class at the learning center set by Idea Foundation NGO on slum site in the
The open space in the slum was a small front yard with a temple where sometimes the classes
were conducted, with construction machines and materials around, which were used by the people
working on construction sites. The learning center was provided with basic teaching materials for
children by the NGO [5]. The teacher from the NGO conducted classes for both the age group
children. There was no furniture for the children, and the floor is used. Basic furniture like a plastic
table and chair was provided for the teacher. The teacher taught different subjects on different days to
both the group of children. Learning Center in Slum 1 is indicated in Figure 2. The children were
given guidance individually according to the grades they were studying in. So the subjects remained
common for the day. The teacher from NGO (key informant) arrived every day at the slum at 7.30 am
and went from house to house, calling out children and taking them with her to the center [7]. The
classes started at 8.30 am and continued till 10:30 am, after that she attended pre-school children for
half an hour. Later, a bus from Identity foundation would drop these kids at the nearby government
school at 11.00 am, which continued till 5:00 pm.
Slum 2: This slum also had migrants from Gulbarga. Ten children out of 17 from this slum
were enrolled in the nearby government school. It is located on the banks of the Mula-Mutha River in
Kalyani Nagar. The vast being a declared slum, there was a supply of electricity and water provided
by the government [8]. Identity foundation NGO had provided bus service for the children to go to
Completely dependent on the NGO-run classes for their education; the older children traveled
to the government school in Lohegaon in the bus provided by the NGOs. Learning Center in Slum 2
is indicated in Figure 3.
Slum 3: The people living here belong to Gujarat, Jharkhand, and Maharashtra, who migrated
to Pune looking for work [9]. These people were engaged in different work like domestic help,
construction site worker, street vendor, private driver, gardener, taxi driver, sweeper, nanny, rag
picker, etc. Part of this slum was a dumping ground for garbage for nearby residences. The teacher
also had to go from door to door, asking parents to send their children to the classes. She would
sometimes get more children, sometimes less [13]. The classes were conducted from 3.00 to 5.00 pm.
This slum has the least number of young children and saw the least strength in the classes in the
learning center. The classes were conducted in a temple in the slum as there was no structure
provided [17]. Most of the older children were enrolled in a government school. They used a bus
provided by Identity Foundation NGO to travel. Learning Center in Slum 3 is indicated in Figure 4.
The visual survey was conducted to understand the spatial patterns of the slums and space
utilization for educational activities. A graphical representation of spatial patterns is shown in Figures
5, Figure 6 and Figure 7.
LEA
RNIN
LEA
G
RNIN
CEN
G
TER
CEN
Figure 7 - Spatial Representation of Learning Space in Slum 3 TER
Children in slums usually are deprived of education owing to many reasons such as distance,
affordability, availability of schools, and supporting infrastructure. In all the three slums studied,
access to education for children was made possible by NGOs, be it providing transport to travel to
Many of the slums suffer from a lack of basic infrastructures like water, electricity, and
sanitation, because of which the everyday life of these slum children became a struggle for survival.
Many children could not study at home owing to a lack of space and electricity. In focus group
discussions, one of the parents said, "I got married at a very young age, and life is quite difficult here.
I am worried about my daughter's education. I only hope that the (NGO) program would be of help
for her future.”
In two slums, a water body was running along with the unclean and posing danger of an
epidemic. In one slum, a part of it was used as a garbage dump yard, which was extremely unhygienic
for the children who had to pass through it every day. Lack of clean water and sanitation aggravates
this issue. One of the parents, who also looks after children besides hers, said, "I look after the kids
here when their parents are out for work. It is risky to leave the kids alone near a sewage plant.
However, to meets the needs (of the family), people have to leave them. The (NGO) classroom
program is of great help to keep children safe." One of the slums was right outside of a sewage
treatment plant area. The untreated dirty water flowed at speed next to the slum, which poses a danger
both for the safety and health of the children. In another slum, many construction junks like
machinery and building materials dumped around, which posed a danger to health and safety. The
teacher would teach slum children about methods of personal and public hygiene. Many children miss
their school and classes in the NGO learning center because they often fall sick.
The visual survey revealed most of the space utilization patterns in slums. The tiny houses in
the slums offered little or no space for the children to study inside homes. In all of the slums, the
public spaces were used for the NGO learning center. In one of the slums, before the center was built,
the teacher used to teach in the temple two hundred meters away. Due to religious issues, they shifted
The biggest hindrance for slum children for education was their parents' financial conditions.
As they struggled to provide for the family's necessities, they hardly could afford education for their
children. As one of the parents in the focus group discussion said, "I am a simple man. We have a
hand-to-mouth struggle every single day. One of my four sons got married recently. Others are
studying in government schools. I want to support their education. I do not want them to end up doing
what I do (for a living)." The NGOs were also helping them financially with free classes and
educational material.
The slum families had mostly both parents working. They would leave early in the morning
and come back late in the evening. Most of the older children had to tend to their younger siblings
and perform house chores. Also, the parents being illiterate could not help their children with their
studies. However, some of them were engaged in community activities like sewing and basket
weaving in the learning centers during the evenings. One of the older children said in the interview, "I
study in 7th standard in Lohegaon government school. I work at home after school hours and take care
of my younger brother. I also help him with his studies. I want to complete my education before I get
married. I want to become a working woman in the future." Another problem with the slum families
was that the migrants' number was more than the number of out-migrants, which created issues for
space, infrastructure, and health.
As the city of Pune is growing, rapid urbanization and developmental activities will bring
more and more migrants to slums. As they constantly move from one slum to another seeking work,
their families, especially the children, would need access to education. The slums in the cases attract
many rural migrants to these areas because of the Metro project and construction activities. In the
cases studied, educational facilities were provided by NGOs, but not every slum would get this kind
of aid. The findings throw light on the everyday struggle of slum children and their unshakable will to
get an education, as they deem it to be the only savior out of their misery. The space utilization study
suggests the need for architectural intervention. The different issues from the inferences suggest the
strong need for policymakers and authorities to implement reformation policies for slum children's
education, including financial aids. Social innovation is not the responsibility of NGOs alone.
However, it has to be a collective effort by every agency involved in urban slum renewal programs.
References
https://unhabitat.org/the-challenge-of-slums-global-report-on-human-settlements-2003
https://pmc.gov.in/en/total-slums
Primary Census Abstract for Slum, 2011, Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner,
India.
http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/file/SLUMS_IN_INDIA_Slum_Compendium_2015_
English.pdf
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/7315211.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_me
dium=text&utm_ campaign=cppst- Jan 19, 2011.
https://mhrd.gov.in/rte
Krishnamurti R et al., City Profile: Pune, India, Cities 2016, 53: 98–109.
Kulabkar P, NGOs and Urban Planning in India: The Case of Pune’s Development Plan, Architecture
& Development, Dec 2019.
Kamalipour H, Improvising Places: The Fluidity of Space in Informal Settlements, Sustainability
2020, 12, 2293.
Pisal A.S. A Study of School Dropout Children in Pune City with Special Reference to Kothurd,
International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research (IJSER), 2017, 5(3), (Online):
2347-3878.
Yin RK: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications, Inc.; 2003.