Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Mini Case Differentiating Customer Service According To Customer Value at Akzo Nobel NI

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Mini Case

Differentiating Customer Service According to Customer Value at Akzo Nobel NI

Akzo Nobel, headquartered in Arnhem, Nertherlands, is one of worlds largest chemical


manufacturers and also one of the world’s largest paint makers. Its chemical unit produces pulp
and paper chemicals, functional chemicals (including flame retardants and animal feed
additives), surfactants (used in detergents and personal care products), polymers, and catalysts.
The polymer division, which serves exclusively the B-to-B market, established a tiered
customer-service policy in the early 2000s. The necessity to introduce this policy came out of
the recognition that customers are becoming more and more demanding when it comes to
asking for additional services around the purchase of polymer products. For example,
customers became increasingly aware that Akzo Nobel offers product disposal services, delivers
nonstandard pallet sizes, and offers negotiable delivery times. On the one hand, Akzo Nobel did
not typically charge for these services, and on the other hand, while extended services were
typically offered only to medium- to high-volume clients, the relationship between service
offerings and client profitability was not clear. When Akzo Nobel investigated more closely who
received the service offerings, it found the correlation with client profitability (i.e., contribution
margin) was very low. This finding led to the development of a formal tiered service-level
framework within the polymer division.
In the first step, the company developed a thorough list of all possible service activities
the company currently offers. Interestingly, the sales force provided a significant number of
these services with little further consideration. Since the sales force was compensated on the
sales volume it generated, it had all the incentive to lure in clients with little consideration for
bottom-line results. Concurrently, to formalize customer service activities, the company
implemented a customer scorecard mechanism. The scorecard allowed it to measure and
document contribution margins per individual customer. Based on these two pieces of
information, the organization then specified which customer type should be eligible for which
type of service. In terms of service allocation, it designated certain services would be free for all
types of customers, certain services would be subject to negotiation for lower-level customers,
and finally, certain services would not be available for the least valuable set of customers.
Although the sales force was not very happy at first with these new measures, the new policy
had a dramatic impact on the sales force understanding of the drivers of customer profitability.

Questions
1. How can an organization compute client-level profitability?
2. What types of systems and processes are needed to document client profitability in a
systematic and ongoing fashion?
3. Is there a way to move established clients accustomed to receiving a large number of
ancillary services for free to paying for these services?

You might also like