Macbeth Studyguide
Macbeth Studyguide
Macbeth Studyguide
Our STUDY GUIDE is a resource for you to use both before and after you work with our
teaching artists and visit our theatre. It’s packed full of information about Shakespeare, his
language, the play, and our production of the play.
We’ve also included post-workshop activities that correspond with each of our
workshops. These are simple activities that you can facilitate with your students to expand
on the work they’ve done with our teaching artists. We’ve included the New York State
Learning Standards for English and the Arts as well as Blueprint Strands; all activities
address at least one standard in each category.
We love hearing from you, and welcome your feedback. We also encourage you to share
your students’ work with us. We’d love to feature it!
or MAIL it to us:
Classic Stage Company
ATTN: Kathleen Dorman
136 East 13th Street
New York, NY 10003
Our Blog is updated weekly with cast interviews and other behind the scenes goodies.
Also, any shared student work may appear on our blog. After you send it, look for it at
cscyoungcompany.blogspot.com
Sincerely,
Kathleen Dorman
Education Manager
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART ONE: SHAKESPEARE’S LIFE AND THEATRE
William Shakespeare: An Illustrated Biography......................................................4
Elizabethan England...................................................................................................5
Growing Up Shakespeare..........................................................................................6
London City Living......................................................................................................7
The Globe Theatre......................................................................................................9
PART ONE:
SHAKESPEARE’S LIFE AND
THEATRE
CLASSIC STAGE COMPANY • THE YOUNG COMPANY: MACBETH • PAGE 4
ELIZABETHAN ENGLAND
IN THE 16TH CENTURY, people believed in the “divine right
of kings.” That is, that monarchs were given their right to rule directly
from God, and they were subject to no earthly authority. When Henry
VIII couldn’t get what he wanted from the heads of the Catholic
Church—namely, a divorce from his first wife, Catherine of Aragon,
who had not given him a male heir—he broke from the Church
and declared himself the head of the new Anglican Church, which
eventually became part of the Protestant Reformation. This was the
beginning of a time of bitter religious disputes in England, full of
assassination attempts.
RIGHT: Children learned to read using a “hornbook” like this one—a piece of wood
covered with printed paper, protected by a transparent sheet of horn.
ABOVE: Like New York City today, space was tight. Many buildings were designed with vertical living in mind, as London quickly
became the epicenter of culture for England.
CLOTHING WAS A SIGN OF ONE’S RANK so there were strict rules dictating what citizens could and could not
wear. Those dressing above their status could be arrested! Exceptions were made for actors as they often played nobles on
stage.
KING DUNCAN
Neil D’Astolfo
◀
PRINCE DONELBAIN PRINCE MALCOM
Tom Giordano Blaze Mancillas
◀
Kills &
Usurps
Loyal Thanes
◀
MACBETH MACDUFF
◀
BANQUO
Dan Bielinski Matt Hurley
John Garrett Greer
◀
Married &
ed
Co-conspirators
rri
◀
Ma
◀
◀
s about
Hires
rophesie
To
K
◀
ill
ill
To K
ENSEMBLE
Lena Bull Zach Clark Laura Lassy Michael Mullen Anita Petry
These cast members play a variety of roles in the show. Some also act as understudies, which means that they
HECATE learn and rehearse parts that are not their own, and are ready to perform at a moment’s notice,
Ito Aghayere just in case another cast member suddenly falls ill or has an emergency.
Is it MACBETH? After all, he was the one who was obsessed with
the prophecy and who murdered Duncan. No one takes his arm
and pushes the knife into the King’s chest while he sleeps. He is
responsible for the death of the King, because at any point he can
make the decision to refuse his wife’s goading, refuse to believe the
witches, refuse to take someone’s life or refuse to accept the crown and
become King...but he doesn’t. Macbeth makes the choice to follow
through with all of these acts. So what does that say about him? Is he
weak and does he make poor decisions because he is scared, or does
he make these decisions because he’s power-hungry and evil at heart?
There are a few moments in the show when Macbeth could have made
a different decision that would have averted the crisis:
• When he meets the witches, he can refuse to accept that
what they say is a prophecy.
• When his wife tells him he needs to kill Duncan, he could
have made her realize how insane and unacceptable such
an action would be.
• When he accepts the Kingship.
If we look at all this evidence, it seems to point directly to Macbeth. Of
course it’s his fault...
Macbeth
But what about LADY MACBETH? Isn’t she just as culpable, if not more,
for the blood that is spilt? The first time the audience meets her, she
has just received the letter from her husband that tells her about the
prophecies and that one has already come true. Almost immediately
her demeanor changes from a longing wife, to a woman calling out to
demons for strength: “Come you spirits that tend on mortal thoughts,
unsex me here!” She becomes just as obsessed with the prophecies of
the witches as her husband—if not more so. Then, when everyone arrives
at the house for the royal banquet, Lady Macbeth preys on her husband’s
insecurities about his masculinity: “when you durst do it, then you were
a man, and to be more than what you were, you would be so much
more the man.” She continues to emasculate him and makes him feel
inadequate until he’s convinced that he has to complete the act. Would
he have killed Duncan without his wife’s convincing? It doesn’t seem that
way. If Lady Macbeth hadn’t:
• Been informed of the prophecies and become obsessed with
them.
• Convinced her husband that killing Duncan was the right thing
to do.
• Fainted after Duncan’s body was recovered to distract
attention from Macbeth’s seeming guilt.
...Macbeth would not have killed the King, or he would have been caught
immediately after. So, it’s her fault then...right?
Lady Macbeth
Or are we really all at the mercy of FATE? Would Macbeth have murdered Duncan and usurped the throne regardless of
his wife’s persuasive argument and the prophecies of the witches? Or maybe someone else would have killed Duncan and
Macbeth would have been elected Lord Protector until Malcolm came of age? Did the witches merely make him aware of
something that was already meant to happen—like Oedipus’ murder of his father—and no matter how hard he tried to escape
it, he would never outrun his destiny?
It’s hard to know for sure what Shakespeare was thinking, who he wanted us to blame, or even if the blame lies with one person!
The best we can do is read the play, attend performances and form our own opinions.
What’s a Dramaturg?
Did you know that almost every production of Shakespeare modifies the play that we read in the classroom for
performance? For example, to get our MACBETH down to an hour-and-a-half (we couldn’t keep you out of school too
much longer than that!), we cut several scenes, a lot of lines, and even a few characters! A dramaturg on a Shakespeare
production is someone who helps to make these kinds of decisions about cuts and changes to the play, and then helps
the director and the actors to understand everything they are saying. In general, a dramaturg can serve many different
roles in the theatre, from working with contemporary playwrights on new plays to giving feedback to a director about how a
production could be stronger. Dramaturgy requires a lot of research and being an expert on the play. The dramaturg also
makes sure the play stays true to the playwright’s intentions.
DID PEOPLE IN SHAKESPEARE’S DAY SPEAK IN VERSE? No, no more than we speak in rap today. But people both then and
now enjoy the rhythm and rhyme of verse. It helps us tune in more immediately, more completely to the feelings and choices of
the characters.
IS SHAKESPEARE HARDER FOR ACTORS TO PERFORM THAN REGULAR PLAYS? Actually, for most actors, Shakespeare is
easier! The rhythm of the language makes it easy to memorize. (You know how song lyrics get stuck in your head, or how you can
remember silly little rhymes from when you were a kid? It’s like that.) And all those rhetorical devices act as clues to tell the actors
how their character feels.
WHAT DO YOU MEAN, “CLUES”? At the start of the rehearsal process, actors do what’s called table work. They sit down
with each other and with the director and talk about all the discoveries they’ve made while studying their scenes. They use this
information to make choices as they move forward with rehearsals. Here are some of the “clues” they look for:
Shakespeare invented many words and phrases that we use on a regular basis today. Above are some examples.
A quick way to tell verse from prose: lines of verse begin with capital letters, while prose will appear in paragraph form.
Blank Verse
Blank Verse is the standard poetic form Shakespeare uses in his plays. It can also be defined as unrhymed iambic pentameter—
that is, a line of poetry containing five (“penta” from the Greek prefix meaning five) iambic feet, not rhyming with any adjacent
line. That’s ten syllables all together. The pattern flows easily for speakers of English, because the stresses match the human
heart beat:
ta DUM, ta DUM, ta DUM, ta DUM, ta DUM
or, a good way to remember the word “iamb” is to think of it as:
i AM, i AM, i AM, i AM, i AM
If you say, “The Yankees and the Mets are New York’s teams” with natural inflection, you will have spoken a line of iambic
pentameter.
The YANK | ees AND | the METS | are NEW | York’s TEAMS
A repeating combination of stressed and unstressed syllables is known as a foot, which is the basic unit of verse.
An iamb is a foot of poetry containing two syllables, with an unstressed syllable followed by a stressed syllable: ta DUM.
Prose
Prose is the everyday language used then and now. Since verse was the conventional method of writing in Elizabethan England,
Shakespeare was actually pushing the literary boundaries by including prose in his plays.
At first glance, it may seem that Shakespeare used verse and prose to indicate a character’s status (rich, powerful, educated
characters speak in verse; poor, common, fools speak in prose) but upon closer look, you’ll find that many characters go back
and forth between verse and prose, and they do so at very specific moments in the play. Actors pay close attention to when
characters speak in verse and when they speak in prose because Shakespeare made these choices on purpose, and it can tell
the actor a lot about how their character thinks and feels.
There is relatively little prose in MACBETH. That fact alone may tell the actors something about the play. An example of prose
comes from the porter’s speech:
PORTER
Here’s a knocking indeed. If a man were porter of hell gate, he should have old turning the key. Knock, knock,
knock! Who’s there, i’th’name of Beelzebub?
There are many, many examples of irregular verse in MACBETH. What do you think this might tell the actors about their characters?
That’s one line of verse, shared by two character, over the course of four sentences that are so simplistic, they would probably
not be taken for poetry on their own!
Macbeth and Lady Macbeth have many shared lines. What does this tell you about their relationship?
Feminine Endings
You probably noticed that there is an extra syllable in the above example. This is an example of what’s called a “feminine
ending,” a line of verse that ends with an unstressed extra syllable. The result is that the rhythm of the verse is thrown off
just enough to indicate that the characters feel unsettled about something. Not surprisingly, over a quarter of the verse in
MACBETH follows this pattern! Here’s another example, spoken by Macbeth when he learns that his wife has died:
Trochaic Tetrameter
A trochee is another type of poetic foot. Its pattern of a stressed syllable followed by an unstressed syllable is the exact
opposite of an iamb: TA dum. Compared to an iamb, this feels surprisingly unnatural to speakers of the English language, so
Shakespeare often uses trochees for his supernatural characters.
In MACBETH, the witches’ spells are in trochaic tetrameter—that is, a line of poetry containing four (“tetra” from the Greek
prefix meaning four) iambic feet. Here’s a famous example:
Try tapping out the rhythm of iambic pentameter, then tapping out the rhythm of trochaic tetrameter. How does each one feel?
Does one feel faster or easier than the other? Which one do you think more naturally represents the way we speak today?
How did we decide what stays and what goes? Our dramaturg talks more about this on page 16.
Characters
Duncan Macduff’s son Siward
Malcolm Old Man Young Siward
Donalbain Messenger Seyton
Macbeth Porter Hecate
Lady Macbeth Ross Three Witches
Banquo Lennon Three Assassins
Fleance Angus Doctor
Macduff Menteith Gentlewoman
Lady Macduff Caithness
ROSS: ROSS:
Is’t known who did this more than bloody deed? Will you to Scone?
MACDUFF: MACDUFF:
Those that Macbeth hath slain. No, cousin, I’ll to Fife.
MACDUFF: MACDUFF:
They were suborn’d. Well, may you see things well done there: adieu!
Malcolm and Donalbain, the king’s two sons, Lest our old robes sit easier than our new!
Are stol’n away and fled; which puts upon them
Suspicion of the deed. ROSS:
Farewell, father.
ROSS:
Gainst nature still! OLD MAN:
Thriftless ambition, that wilt ravin up God’s benison go with you; and with those
Thine own life’s means! Then ‘tis most like That would make good of bad, and friends of foes!
The sovereignty will fall upon Macbeth.
[Exeunt]
MACDUFF:
He is already named, and gone to Scone
To be invested.
NOTES:
The cuts that have been made to the script are mostly to reduce the running time of the piece. MACBETH is famously one
of Shakespeare’s shortest plays, so it’s much easier to make edits to this play than to others. The exchange between the Old
Man and Ross that occurs at the beginning of the scene is an interesting moment that is important to the development of the
theme, if the director chooses to interpret the play as a criticism of ambition and obsession with power. However, if the director
chooses to focus his or her production on the role of fate and divine intervention in determining the paths of mortals, the
moment is not necessary.
Fleance is a speaking role. Fleance is still in the show but he does not speak.
Malcolm speaks a brief epilogue after the crown is The epilogue by Malcolm is rarely included, and we’ve cut
placed on his head at the end of Act 5; interestingly, it implies it here to end the play in a more theatrical manner,
that Lady Macbeth committed suicide (“Who, as tis thought, with all on stage declaring Malcom the new King
by self and violent hands took off her life.”) (“Hail, King of Scotland!”).
Siward has a son called Young Siward who appears Siward’s son is not an important enough character to
in the battle sequences. keep in the piece when one is trying to make edits.
ABOVE: CSC NextGen students meeting with MACBETH director Tony Speciale.
One of the unique things about doing a play at CSC is the intimacy of the space. The audience is really in on the
action because they’re only a few feet away from the actors. It feels almost voyeuristic. I imagine this intimacy will allow
for a microscopic look at Macbeth and his vulnerabilities. I think the goal is for the audience to care for him, even
though he does horrific things. In many ways he’s a victim.
How did you decide the way you would portray the witches?
In every Shakespeare play there is a character or group of characters that pose an interpretative challenge for a
modern director. In A MIDSUMMER NIGHT’S DREAM it’s the fairies. In THE TEMPEST it’s the sprites. In MACBETH
it’s the witches. Who are they? Why are they in the play? What kind of magic do they truly wield and why are they so
invested in the character Macbeth? In our production, the witches represent the trapped souls of the widows of fallen
soldiers. Their pain and loss compel them to set in motion a chain reaction of events through their power of prophecy
and conjuration. One may also perceive them as figments of Macbeth’s imagination. One idea I’m interested in
exploring is the notion that Macbeth is experiencing post-traumatic stress from his service in the military. He went
through something life-altering on the battlefield and his psyche is irrevocably damaged. The witches represent a
physical manifestation of his emotional and psychological disorder. His darkest secrets and desires are brought to the
surface as a result. The witches only shine a light on what’s already there.
Which scene do you anticipate being the most challenging scene to direct?
I think Act V is going to be challenging. The play is episodic in nature but the final act has several short scenes that
snap back and forth between locations (e.g. interior castle scenes followed by exterior wood scenes). I find it difficult in
general to do battle scenes on stage. Films do them much more realistically. On stage I often see fight choreography
that is either poorly executed or that is just weak and so abstract that it avoids the brutality of war completely. I’d like
to have incredible moments of realistic fighting followed by more metaphoric and abstract movement that could only
take place in the theatre. Shakespeare is poetic after all, and the theatre allows a production the opportunity to be
larger than reality. And then there’s Macbeth’s severed head at the end. Not sure how we’re going to do that. Guess
you’ll have to come see the production to find out!
Interested in joining? See page 33 for more information on the program and instructions on how to apply!
For more ideas on what to watch for, see NOTES ON THE PLAY on page 14.
Go through the characters one at a time and talk about who they are, and what celebrity could be cast as that character.
Example: Macduff is loyal and brave, and he also cares very much about his family. Chris Hemsworth could be a good Macduff,
since he is a leading man “hero” type but also has a strong, intimidating presence.
Shakespeare hyphenated words, added prefixes (un-, be-, en-, de-, dis-), turned adjectives into verbs, and made up new words
entirely. Come up with your own list of words with the class. (Example: unstaple, belight, ensleep, destart, dismark)
When you have a variety of examples, have your students step into role as Shakespeare writing his next play. Give them ten
minutes to write the first few lines of the play. (Example: I belit the room to unstaple my paper. He was ensleep’d and I woke
him up...)
Then have a few volunteers read their scenes aloud: students must cast their play within the company (the class) and do a
reading of the scene.
Split students into groups based on the role they are playing (all the Macbeths together, all the witches together, etc.) Pass out
giant pieces of paper and have one student in the group lay down on the paper while another traces his or her outline. Note
that this activity can also be done independently on regular sheets of paper. Simply have the student trace the outline of their
own hand.
Ask the groups to write things that their character thinks, feels, or says about himself or herself on the INSIDE of the outline;
they should write things other characters think, feel, or say about their character on the OUTSIDE. Encourage groups to search
through the text of MACBETH for actual quotes!
When groups are finished brainstorming, hang your “role on the wall” and whip around to each group to allow them to
share their findings. What did they learn about their character? How will they incorporate this knowledge into their scene
presentations?
Print out pieces of paper with character names on them or have students make the papers.
Pass out the names to twelve students. Have them arrange themselves (in character) in order from youngest character to
oldest; who knows the most about what’s going on in the play to who knows the least; highest status to lowest status; most
honest to least honest; most loyal to least loyal, etc. Encourage discussion: does the class agree with the placement? If not,
why not? You can alternate the participating group of students, and take category suggestions from the class.
Ask students to discuss specific elements of the play in their review: the acting, the set, the costumes, the lighting, the music.
What elements helped them understand or relate to the characters and story? Would they recommend this production to their
friends? Out of five stars, how many would they give this production?
SEND YOUR REVIEWS TO CSC! We’d love to feature them on our Young Company blog (cscyoungcompany.blogspot.com).
The National Endowment for the Arts in partnership with Arts Midwest presents Shakespeare for a New Generation. CSC is one of 42 professional
theatre companies selected to participate in Shakespeare for a New Generation, bringing the finest productions of Shakespeare to middle- and
high-school students in communities across the United States. This is the tenth year of Shakespeare for a New Generation, the largest tour of
Shakespeare in American history.
This program is supported, in part, by public funds from the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs in partnership with the City Council, and is made possible
by the New York State Council on the Arts with the support of Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature. Special thanks to the Harold and Mimi Steinberg
Charitable Trust for supporting Classic Stage Company.
classicstage.org/education/youngcompany