#7 Design For Quality and Product Excellence
#7 Design For Quality and Product Excellence
#7 Design For Quality and Product Excellence
o Companies today face incredible pressures to continually improve the quality of their products
while simultaneously reducing cost, to meet ever – increasing legal and environmental
requirements, and to launch new products faster to met changing consumer needs and remain
competitive.
The ability to achieve these goals depends on a large extent on product design (by which
we also imply redesign).
Better designs not only reduce costs, but improve quality.
Effective design processes are vital to meeting customer requirements, achieving quality,
and innovation.
o Product Development
Most companies have some type of structures product development process. The typical
product development process, consists of six phases:
1. Idea Generation – new or redesigned product ideas should incorporate customer
needs and expectation.
However, true innovations often transcend customers’ expressed desires,
simply because customers may not know what they like until they have it.
Idea generation often focuses on exciters and delighters as described in the
Kano model.
2. Preliminary Concept Development – in this phase, new ideas are studied for
feasibility.
3. Product / Process Development – if an idea survives the concept stage – and many do
not – the actual design process begins by evaluating design alternatives and
determining engineering specification for all materials, components, and parts.
This phase is usually including prototype testing, in which a model (real or
simulated) is constructed to test the product’s physical properties or use under
actual operating conditions, as well as consumer reactions to the prototypes.
4. Full – scale Production – once the design is approved and the production process has
been set up, the company releases the product to manufacturing or service delivery
teams.
5. Market Introduction – the product is distributed to customers.
6. Market Evaluation – Deming and Juran both advocated an ongoing product
development process that relies on market evaluation and customer feedback to
initiate continuous improvements.
o Concurrent Engineering – is a process in which all major functions involved with bringing a
product to market are continuously involved with product development from conception through
sales.
Such an approach not only helps achieve trouble – free introduction of products and
services, but also results in improved quality, lower costs, and shorter product
development cycles.
Concurrent engineering involves multifunctional teams, usually consisting of 4 to 20
members and including every specialty in the company.
The functions of such teams are to perform and coordinate the activities in the product
development process simultaneously, rather than sequentially.
o Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) – represents a structured approach to product development and a
set of tools and methodologies for ensuring that goods and services will meet customer needs
and achieve performance objectives, and that the process used to make and deliver them achieve
high levels of quality.
DFSS helps designers and engineers better translate customer requirements into design
concepts, concepts into detailed designs, and detailed designs into well – manufactured
goods or efficient services.
DFSS consists of four principal activities:
1. Concept Development – focuses on creating and developing a product idea
and determining its functionality based upon customer requirements,
technological capabilities and economic realities.
2. Detailed Design – focuses on developing specific requirements and design
parameters such as specifications and tolerances to ensure that the product
fulfills the functional requirements of the concept.
3. Design Optimization – seek to refine designs to identify and eliminate
potential failures, achieve high reliability, and ensure that it can be easily
manufactured, assembled, or delivered in an environmentally – responsible
manner.
4. Design Verification – ensures that the quality level and reliability
requirements of the product are achieved.
These activities are often incorporated into a process known as DMADV which stands
for define, measure, analyze, design and verify.
1. Define – focuses on identifying and understanding the market need or
opportunity.
2. Measure – gathers the voice of the customer, identifies the vital characteristics
and that are most important to customers, and outlines the functional
requirements of the product that will meet customer needs.
3. Analyze – is focused on concept development from engineering and aesthetic
perspectives. This often includes the creation of drawings, virtual models, or
simulations to develop and understand the functional characteristic of the
product.
4. Design – focuses on developing detailed specifications, purchasing
requirements, and so on, so that the concept can be produced.
5. Verify – involves prototype development, testing, and implementation
planning for production.
o Detailed Design
Conceptual designs must be translated into measurable technical requirements and,
subsequently, into detailed design specification.
Detailed design focuses in establishing technical requirements and specifications, which
represent the transition from a designer’s concept to a producible design, while also
ensuring that it can be produced economically, efficiently, and with high quality.
Axiomatic design based on the premise that good design is governed by laws similar to
those in natural science. Two axioms (statement accepted as true without proof) govern
the design process:
1. Independence Axiom – good design occurs when the functional requirements
of the design are independent of one another.
2. Information Axiom – good design corresponds to minimum complexity.
These axioms guide the design process with the goals of creating the best possible
product to achieve the desired functions.
o Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) sometimes called cause and effect tree analysis, is a method to
describe combinations or events that can lead to a failure.
In effect, it is a way to drill down and identify causes associated with failures and is a
good complement to DFMEA.