Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

PBL, Supervision and Process Skills

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 52

Anette Kolmos

UCPBL
http://www.i4.auc.dk/ak
http://www.plan.auc.dk/~ak
• PBL

• Supervision

• Development of process
competencies

• Faculty development strategies


• Expanded university system
New universities with new pedagogy (Bremen,
Maastricht, Aalborg, Roskilde, Linköping,
Open University, UK)
• From elite to mass university
– Broader recruitment (social class and gender)
– Start of distance learning programmes
(adults, returners, continuing education)
• Internationalisation and growing globalisation
• Employability
• Co-operation with industry
– Local development
• Privatisation
– Management structure
– Research funds and scholarships
• Student centred versus teacher centred,
– drop out rates, overstuffed curriculum, lack of
motivation
• The overall objective of this Master’s program is for the student to gain
competence in the understanding of innovative teaching and
educational experiments so that he/she has the capacity to
develop an experimental practice that leads to continuous
improvement of the quality within the technical science education.
The experiments are based on problem-based learning and are aimed
at groups of students with diverse backgrounds and characteristics, for
example sex, class, cultural background and age.

On a scientific foundation, the education will provide the student with the
ability:
• To understand the meaning of engineers’ global and national
competence development, including the role of engineering education
to society.
• To methodologically analyse, develop, implement, and evaluate
longer and interrelated educational programs within engineering
education and work life.
• To methodologically analyse, develop, implement, and evaluate
various student-centred teaching programs within engineering
education and work life.
• To methodologically reflect, document, and develop his/her own
• PBL: problem based learning
• PBL: project based learning
• PBLE: problem based learning engineering
• POL: project organised learning
• PLEE: project lead engineering education (Powel)
• TPL (Total Project Learning) (Finland)

• Dual learning- work based learning


• Self-directed specialisation learning – master thesis
model
• Autodidactic learning – all aspects of learning
• Problem
• Project,
• Problem solving
• Stanford version: P5BL: problem, project,
product, process and people
• Architecture and Design version: Play
• Problem based learning: 102.000 links
– + pbl: 24.400
• Project based learning: 46.000 links
– + pbl: 4.340
• Problem based learning and project based
learning: 1700
• Project oriented learning (POL): 1.050 links
– + pbl: 88
26. October via Stofa
• Different practices within the guidelines
of traditional educational models.

• Specific educational models based on


the PBL principles,

• Central theoretical learning principles,


• Single courses
• No change in examination
• Individual examination
• No difference between group work
and project work
• No support from the organisation
• No training – enthusiasts
Vic Neufeld McMaster
etableret in
Donald R.
Woods
1968
Henk Schmidt Maastricht in
Peter Bouhuijs
1972
Linköping in
Knud Illeris
1972
Eva Hultengren Roskilde in
1972
Aalborg in
1974
• Constructive allignment (Biggs, Trigwell,
Ramsden) Students’ learning and teachers’
teaching
• Relation didactic (Hiim and Hippe) scandinavian
approach: system- individual
• Disciplinary cultures (Becher and Trowler)
identity in academia
• Communities of Practice (Lave and Wenger)
Goals and competencies

Organisation and Teacher


culture

Assessment Selection of
content

Frame: Space, Students


resources

Methods
• PBL for epistemological Competence
• PBL for professional action
• PBL for Interdisciplinary understanding
• PBL for transdisciplinary learning
• PBL for critical contestability
• a project each semester (1. year)
• 30 ECTS: 7,5 for Study unit courses, the rest
for a project unit: 7,5 for project courses, 15
for project
• each group has a group room
• group size of 6-8 students first year, 2-3
students the last year
• each group has at least one supervisor
• self selected group and projects within
themes and disciplines
• group examination
Study courses and
Project courses lectures
lectures seminar
50%
Examination

Project
50%

Examination
• Thematic blocks
• group based
• based on case studies
• interdisciplinary
• individual examination
Aalborg Maastricht
• Subject based • Process based
supervison supervision

• Instruktion, examples, • Facilitating chair and


questions, dialogue, reporter
faciltation
• Progress testing
“supervisor ”

“Students”

http://meds.queensu.ca/medicine/pbl/pblhome.htm
Tutor

Students

reporter

chair
http://meds.queensu.ca/medicine/pbl/pblhome.htm
• Where in the proces
• Where in the education
• Type of projects and objectives
• Type of students
– Experienced?
– Brilliant or poor students
– Social competence

Ability to read the situation …. Students


are hiding themselves
• Summarizing
• mirroring
• asking open-ended questions
• use why, how, what, where
• dynamic list of questions
• feedback as thinking loudly
Student-centred
Small student groups
Teachers are
facilitators/guides
Problems form the focus
and stimulus for learning
Problems are the vehicle
for development of
problem solving skills
New information is
acquired through self
directed learning
Learning is a constructive
process and not a receptive
process

Knowing about knowing


affects learning –
metacognition

Social and contextual factors


influence Learning
(Gijselaers, 1996)
• Danish context: Illeris refering to Dewey, Piaget og
Lewin
• Negt Kluge
• American research: Bruner, Dewey, Piaget, Vygotsky,
Gardner
• German research: William Killpatrick, USA, 1919
(Heitmann, 1993)

• AAU-research: professional reflection and development


of theories
- Problem based
- Contextual learning

- Participant directed
- Group based learning
- Experience based learning

- Activity based learning


- Theory-practice relation
- Interdisciplinary learning
- Exemplary learning
Profession based theories
Cognitive theories
exemplarity

interdisciplinary
Theory and
practice Content
Experience and
Situated interest Social
learning Problem Team learning
contexual
Participant
directed Communication

Motivation
and
psychology
• Improvement of skills (Dochy et al 2003)
– Tendency they get deep knowledge – and
better understanding
– Improvement of motivation and engagement
among both students and staff
• Variation in the understanding of PBL
(Dahlgren, 2003)
• Improved subject interest
• Improved engagement and motivaton
• Difficult to implement
• Difficult in relation to independency and
self directed learning
• Tendency that the effect of PBL is related
to the degree of implementation in the
organisation
(Thomas, 2000)
– Critical thinking
– Co-operation
– Intercultural co-operation
– Communication
– Project management
– Indepence Also known as:
- core competencies,
– Language - transferable skills,
– Interdisciplinarity - process skills,
- key skills,
- higher order skills
- etc
• Courses at the first year program: Collaboration -
learning - project management: CLP

• Submit both a project and a process analysis

• Examination of both project and process analysis


Instruction Students had Front-up Process
1980 - 1993 not previous m odel analysis poor
experiences - Introductio and not
w ith PB L n to PB L serious: 1 -
- N o relation 1½ page
betw een
courses and
process
analysis
Theory and D iverse Interactive Process
reflection-on- experiences m odel analysis
action - Effective im proved: 2 -
1994 - 1999 learning 5 pages
- reflection
loops
Portfolio: D iverse L earning G reat
reflection-in- experiences - com m unity im provem ent
action, but m ajority m odel of the process
experim ents has PB L - creating a analysis/
2000 - experiences reflective portfolio: 15
culture in pages
the groups
• Related to praxis and experience
• methods in analysis and structuring of
knowledge
• awareness of tacit knowledge
• empathic part (tacit knowledge)

• risk of reactive thinking (past experiences)


• Innovative experiences and creativity
• Conscious planning
• Awareness of the problem and solution

• Not ”dangerous” - it is only an experiment….


• What if ….. play more ….

• proactive thinking - looking forward…


Types of experiments and reflection
Concrete experience
Trial
and
error
explorative - common sense

Active Reflective
experiment
move-testing - comparative type observation

hypothesis - vertical type

Abstract conceptualization
Project management

Project planning and management


- What is a project ?
- Why project management ?
- The paradox of planning
- Tools for planning and management
- Collecting data for the portfolio

Project design
- Experiences with project plans
- Project design ?
- Report design ?
students just make a calendar on a sheet of
paper :

“if we make a calendar and enter all our


activities on the respective dates, we will
be able to see how we can manage to
finish our project in due time”
Based on students experiences and/or
reflection, they develop a calendar:

“we should allot time for a visit for a


company and then add an activity called
further consideration/analysis after the
visit”
The students try to estimate time of various
activities, and based on the former experiences
reach conclusion that they have to add “buffer
time” to special activities.
“What if the laboratory tests we have planned take
more time or fail..?”
This experiment implies that the group set up
criteria and decide how they will carry out their
test
- Observation of the
communication
- analysis of the
diagram according to:

national background,
gender

roles and function

sharing the work

experiences
• Supervision/facilitation is incredible important to
establish the progression among the different types of
experiments…
• Training of supervisors needed……

• The course has been based on experiential learning,


emphasising the reflection part - and now also the
experimental part
• Experiments and reflection are integrated elements -
if there were no experiments there were nothing to
reflect on - if there were no reflection, trial and error
would dominate...
• Creativity is an important part of the experiments
• also students must learn about the types of
experiments and relate them to their own
learning strategy
• students interest - engineering students are
interested……
• clear assessment criteria
• integrated respected part of the culture, e.g.
support from the project supervisors - hard to
get
• double qualified teachers to teach the course -
both technical knowledge and knowledge of
process competencies
• research and document the development - and
bring in learning theories, management theories,
co-operation theories etc….

You might also like