Absorption and Marginal Costing - Additional Questions
Absorption and Marginal Costing - Additional Questions
Absorption and Marginal Costing - Additional Questions
Surat is a small business which has the following budgeted marginal costing profit and
loss account for the month ended 31 December 2001:
Particulars Sub-Total ($’000) Total Amount ($’000)
Sales 48.00
Cost of sales:
Opening stock 3.00
Production costs 36.00
Closing stock (7.00)
(32.00)
Gross Contribution 16.00
Other variable costs:
Selling (3.20)
Contribution 12.80
Fixed Costs
Production overheads (4.00)
Administration (3.60)
Selling (1.20)
(8.80)
Net Profit 4.00
The budget was prepared using absorption costing principles. If budgeted production
in the first month had been 2,000 units then the total production cost would have
been $188,000.
Required:
(a) Using the high-low method, calculate:
(i) the variable production cost per unit; and
(ii) the total monthly fixed production cost.
(b) If the budget for the first month of trading had been prepared using
marginal costing principles, calculate:
(i) the total contribution; and
(ii) the net profit.
(c) Explain clearly the circumstances in which the monthly profit or loss would
be the same using absorption or marginal costing principles.
The normal monthly level of production is 25,000 units and stocks are valued at
standard cost.
Required:
(a) Prepare in full a budgeted profit statement for this month using absorption
costing principles. Assume that fixed production overhead costs are absorbed
using the normal level of activity.
(b) Prepare a statement that reconciles the net profit calculated in (a) with the
net profit using marginal costing.
(c) Which of the two costing principles (absorption or marginal) is more
relevant for short-run decision-making, and why?