Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Unit 1 What Is Popular Literature?: 1.0 Objectives

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

What is Popular Literature?

UNIT 1 WHAT IS POPULAR LITERATURE?

Structure
1.0 Objectives
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Culture, Civilisation and Ideology
1.3 Popular Culture
1.3.1 Popular Culture, Mass Culture, Commodity and the Marketplace
1.3.2 Popular Culture as Residual Category
1.3.3 Popular Culture and the Idea of Hegemony
1.3.4 Popular Culture and America
1.4 Popular Literature
1.4.1 The advent of Postmodernism
1.4. 2 Defining Popular Literature
1.4.3 Genres of Popular Literature
1.4.4 Inverse Relationship between Literary Merit and Popular Literature
1.4.5 Literature and Media
1.4.6 Popular Literature Today
1.5 Let Us Sum Up
1.6 Hints to Check Your Progress
1.7 Glossary
1.8 Suggested Readings & References

1.0 OBJECTIVES
This unit will introduce you to the overarching framework of culture and popular
culture that encases the concept of popular literature. It will then discuss some of
the salient points of the larger debate that surrounds the concept of the ‘popular’.
We shall define, ‘popular’, then, present you an overview of popular culture. In
this overview we shall be looking at the origins of popular culture, debates around
popular culture, and the various connotations of the term popular culture, mass
culture, commodity and the market place. Towards the end we shall introduce
you briefly to some genres of popular literature. We end with discussing the
relationship between literary merit and the marketplace, popular literature and
media and conclude with a short note on popular literature today. We shall begin
by looking at what Literature is and the relation between popular and literature
next.

1.1 INTRODUCTION
Literature is considered to be a reflection of the culture of its times. As you
know, it is also said that literature mirrors society. Literature is considered to be
written works that have some artistic merit in it and has lasting value. The two
most important words in the term ‘popular literature’ are ‘popular’ and ‘literature’.
Both the terms are expansive and wide in meaning. “Popular” comes from the
Greek word “Populus”, which means people. So popular culture/literature is
people’s culture/ literature, that is capable of affecting 90 % of the people, 90 %
5
Popular Literature: An of the time. Popular is one of the most widely circulated terms in today’s critical
Introduction
discourse: in literature, politics and social studies, it pertains to the ordinary, the
accessible, well liked, informal and to policies and artifacts benefiting people.
What is important is that to understand popular literature in all its dimensions,
it is essential to be aware of the genesis, background and milieu in which this
term has gained currency and meaning. “Popular Literature” includes both fiction
and non-fiction. To understand its varied dimensions, a close look at the
phenomenon of “mass-culture” and reading taste is required and that is what we
shall look at next.

1.2 CULTURE, CIVILISATION AND IDEOLOGY


In this section we shall look at the background of popular literature by beginning
with a pertinent question - What is Culture? ‘Culture’ is a term that has been
under scrutiny for a long time.  Operating simultaneously along several competing
axes of meaning, one needs to pay close attention to the context in which it is
used in order to determine its several possible meanings. Each age has witnessed
a troubled and problematic understanding of the notion of culture. Raymond
Williams describes culture as “one of the two or three most complicated words
in the English language.” (Williams, 1976, 76) Thus, it will be useful to trace the
evolution of the notion of culture chronologically. Tracing the word back to its
Latin roots, we find that the word ‘culture’ is cultura, from the root colere, which
has a range of meanings: inhabit, cultivate, protect, honour with worship. The
primary meaning then was in husbandry, the tending of natural growth. For a
long time ‘culture’ was thus, used as a ‘noun of process’ to refer to the tending,
growth or cultivation of something, usually, crops or animals (Williams in Bennett,
1981, 77). In the 16th century ‘culture’ referred to the growth or cultivation of
human attributes. By the 18 th century it functioned, as a synonym for
Enlightenment’s concept of civilisation. During the Enlightenment, the only form
of culture that was sanctified was the official, elite culture of European societies. In
the 19th century, however, the meanings of the term ‘culture’ expanded and began
to be differentiated from that of ‘civilisation’.

In the 18th century, with the rise of industrialisation, the term ‘Civilisation’ was
limited to describing the development of economic, social and political
institutions, and the word ‘culture’ was regarded as a particular set of codes of
conduct or attitudes which were held to be best exemplified in works of art, of
the select few, who are the proclaimed guardians of good taste.  Mathew Arnold
in Culture and Anarchy (1869), referred to real culture as, ‘the best that had been
thought and said in the world’. But soon in the 19th century ‘culture’ began to be
used in the plural. An interesting addition was the term ‘folk’ or ‘peasant’ culture.
This led to the use of the term ‘cultures’ referring to at least two kinds of culture,
one of the ‘select few’ and the other, of the people especially the peasantry. In
most academic quarters, it is usually argued that the term ‘culture’ stands for
those artistic pursuits that are considered to be of a certain value or standard i.e.
culture proper. Other forms of activity are looked at differently – as entertainment,
recreation or leisure or, pejoratively, as ‘mass culture’.  It was not until the early
19th century that ‘popular’ was used as a term of recommendation – albeit in a
fairly casual way – in the sense that the thing or person(s) to which it was applied
were ‘well-liked by many people’ (Williams, 1976, 199) and, moreover, that this
was to be counted in their favor.
6
The traditional classical concept of ideology was considered close to ‘culture’, What is Popular Literature?
but it suggested those forms of intellectual and artistic activity, which were related
to economic and political practices.  Thus, it may be suggested that culture should
be used as a general term to refer to ‘the complex unity of those practices that
produce sense’, reserving the term ideology for specific types of culture – for
political ideas. To sum up, the term culture is largely used as an umbrella term to
refer to all of those activities, or practices, which produce sense or meaning. 
This includes the customs and rituals that govern or regulate our social
relationships on a day-to-day basis as well as those texts – literary, musical, and
audiovisual – through which the social and natural world is re-presented or
signified. Culture in modern times demands an encounter with newer terrains
and transitions. Culture helps people develop. There are claims that culture
consists of tacit knowledge, and is the domain of primary socialisation. Culture
is also a bunch of memory, history and the past.

Check Your Progress 1


1) What are the early understandings of the term ’culture’?
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................

1.3 POPULAR CULTURE 


Having been introduced to the general idea of culture, civilisation, ideology and
‘cultures’, let us now look at the broad landscape of popular culture. There is a
very high correlation between a person’s occupation, his/her socio-economic
status, the kind of music that appealed to him/her, the kind of cinema that was
likely to get his/her patronage, the kind of literature she/he read, and so on and
so forth. Education alone cannot direct a person’s preferences completely. Some
of the famous exponents of popular culture, such as Ray B Browne, Marshall
Fishwick, Bruce Ludke, John Cawelti, Russel B Nye, C W E Bigsby, Leslie
Fiedler to name a few have tried to define various facets of popular culture.
Browne uses the symbol of the eyeball. On the one end is folk culture, on the
other, elite culture, in the middle, constituting the largest portion is the iris, in
which rests the pupil therein, lies popular culture-ever expanding, ever growing
and always seeing widely, intently and deeply. And the eyeball is horizontal not
vertical. Hence, it is inappropriate to think of one culture as “high” and another
as “low”. Further popular culture provides a kind of audio-visual profile of a
nation. It pictures the smiles and it echoes the sighs of contentment. Advocates
of popular culture insist that popular culture is essential for the health of
academics. Not only this, popular culture is the practical-pragmatic humanities.
It can be used as a tool to assist in education. It can be utilised in numerous ways
to encourage learning, to overcome illiteracy, to retain people in school, and to
energise our educational system. Popular culture is the television we watch, the
cinema we give patronage to, the type of food— fast, junk, or conventional, that
we eat, the type of attire we wear, the music we appreciate, the things we spend
7
Popular Literature: An money on, in short, the whole society we live in. It is virtually our life and the
Introduction
world that surrounds us.

In the 19th century, Mathew Arnold’s school of thought, worried that Popular
Culture represented a threat to cultural and social authority, but the Frankfurt
School, a group of German intellectuals noted with deep interest the displacement
and menace caused by the explosion of mass culture: from newspapers and cinema
to popular fiction and Jazz. They argued that it actually produces the opposite
effect; it maintains social authority. In 1944, the German intellectuals Max
Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno coined the term ‘Culture Industry’ to
designate the processes of mass culture, (Storey, 2001, 85). An attempt to plunder
Popular Culture as a sociological and anthropological study was also made. Turner
in his seminal study Structure and Anti-Structure opines that Popular Culture is
world turned upside down in a stratified society. Pierre Bourdieu argues that
the celebration of ‘the remarkable of the unremarkable’- the everyday, forms the
core of Popular Culture. Let us look at what is popular culture, mass culture, and
how popular culture may be marketed in the sub section that follows.

1.3.1 Popular Culture, Mass Culture, Commodity and the


Marketplace
Popular Culture is surely culture, which is widely favoured or well-liked by
many people.  For this, one has to only examine the market: sales of books,
sales of albums and videos.  We could also scrutinise market research figures on
audience preferences for different television programmes. Such figures tell us
that popular culture includes a quantitative dimension in it. The popular of Popular
Culture seems to demand it. Popular Culture, oft defined as ‘mass culture’, is
also mass-produced for mass consumption. This commodified culture is formulaic
and manipulative for a mass of non-discriminating consumers who consume
with a certain brain-numbed passivity. This has been increasingly debated in
recent years.  It is true that a good number of new products fail to make a mark
despite extensive advertising; many films fail to recover even their promotional
costs at the box office and also that about 80 % of music and video albums
released every year lose money. Such statistics clearly call into question the notion
of cultural consumption as an automatic and passive activity. There seems to be
almost a natural relationship between the popular and the masses. We’ll look at
popular cultural as a residual category next.

1.3.2 Popular Culture as Residual Category


But then, another way to understand and define Popular Culture is, as a residual
category. It suggests that it is the culture, which is left over after we have decided
on what high culture is. In this definition, Popular Culture exists to accommodate
cultural texts and practices, which fail to meet the required standards to qualify
as high culture. In other words, Popular Culture exists as inferior culture. This is
often supported by claims that Popular Culture is mass-produced commercial
culture, whereas high culture is the result of an individual act of creation. The
latter, therefore, deserves a moral and aesthetic response whereas the former
requires a cursory glance and has little to offer. The next subsection will look at
popular culture within the domain of hegemony.

8
1.3.3 Popular Culture and the Idea of Hegemony What is Popular Literature?

To understand Popular Culture in its entirety, it would be unwise to ignore the


development of the concept of hegemony of the Italian Marxist Antonio
Gramsci.  Gramsci uses the term ‘hegemony’ to refer to the way in which
dominant groups in society, through a process of ‘intellectual and moral
leadership’, seek to win the consent of the subordinate groups in society. Known
as neo–Gramscian hegemony theory, it sees Popular Culture as a site of struggle
between the ‘resistance’ of subordinate groups and the forces of ‘incorporation’
of the dominant groups in society.  Popular Culture thus, is not the imposed
culture of the mass culture theorists, nor is it the culture that emerges from below,
or the culture of ‘the people’. Rather, it is a terrain of exchange and negotiation
between the two; a terrain, marked by resistance and incorporation, a condition
of ideological struggle between dominant and subordinate cultures. Popular
Culture has also been variously defined as modern majority culture; protest
culture; a counter tradition in literature; para or sub literature; lowbrow as against
highbrow; public enterprise as opposed to private enterprise; and vulgar as
contrasted with avant-garde. But today, all of us accept Popular Culture as a
legitimate, though slightly contested, site for serious study and discussion, but
the quintessential debate on the ‘cult of the elite and pop’ has had a long, tortuous
and torturous history. Let us now look at popular culture as an offshoot of
American culture next.

1.3.4 Popular Culture and America


For critics working within the mass culture paradigm, mass culture is, in a clear
identifiable sense, imported American culture. If Popular Culture in its modern
form was invented in any one place, it was in the great cities of the United States,
and above all in New York. The claim that Popular Culture is American culture
has a long history within the theoretical mapping of Popular Culture. It operates
under the term ‘Americanization’.  Its central theme is that British culture has
declined under the homogenising influence of American culture. True, because
Popular Culture, as a pervasive phenomenon, hit the Americans as early as the
1920s. Later, in the 1940s, the Bowling Green University critics like, Ray B
Browne, Bruce Ludke, Marshall Fishwick, John Cawelti, C W E Bigsby, etc.
were the first to voice out their concern for this culture, eulogised by the masses.
According to them, the ever-expanding consciousness of Popular Culture doesn’t
polarise cultures and dilutes, destroys or reduces them to the lowest common
denominator.

Talking of American culture, Fiedler says that the culture of the United States
has always been “popular” beneath a “thin overlay of imported European elitism”
(1982, 64). He further says that “Our national mythos is a pop myth and our
revolution consequently a pop revolution, when Europeans or other non-American
cultures talk of the incursion in their culture of pop forms like rock, country, and
western music, comic books, soap operas and cop shows on television, they tend
to refer to it as a “creeping Americanization” (1982, 65) of their cultures and is
used as a synonym for “vulgarization”.

9
Popular Literature: An Check Your Progress 2
Introduction
1) In what ways is culture understood as ‘high’ and ‘low’?
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
2) Define popular culture and elaborate on its multiple connotations.
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................

1.4 POPULAR LITERATURE


So, as you may have read, though popular literature: stories, songs, fiction,
romances, plays, etc existed since time immemorial, serious consideration of the
broad field of popular literature as a significant category only started in the 20th
century. You must have also understood from the various critical and theoretical
statements on popular culture, that there existed a certain resistance to its
admittance into the academia. A lot of water has flown under the bridge since
then. To a large extent the advent of postmodernism played an important role in
its legitimate position today. Let us see how Postmodernism helped legitimise
popular literature.

1.4.1 The Advent of Postmodernism


The advent of postmodernism in the 20th century brought in a complete breakdown
of categories. It brought an end to an elitism that was based on distinctions of
culture. In another way it celebrated the victory of commerce over culture. 
Postmodernism dismantled the boundary between ‘authentic’ and ‘commercial’
culture. A good example can be found in the relationship between television
commercials and music. For example, there is a growing list of artists who have
had hit records as a result of their songs appearing in television commercials. One
of the questions this relationship raises is: ‘What is being sold, song or product?’
I suppose the obvious answer is - both. Even the high priests of postmodernism,
Fredrick Jameson, Baudrillard, Lyotard, Susan Sontag, Hal Foster,
acknowledge this ‘new sensibility’ in understanding the cultural discourse of
today. In the next subsection, we shall try and define popular literature.

1.4.2 Defining Popular Literature


Popular literature in its simplest sense was that kind of literature that was excluded
from the academia. It was not taught in school and university classrooms. In
10 fact, it was not even literature. It was considered to be songs, stories, legends,
fables (oral or written) and kitchen maid romances not worthy to be taught. But What is Popular Literature?
they still existed and were mass produced and consumed by the people and had
a life of their own. Within its ambit were found a tradition of folk narratives and
orature.

In the wake of new critical thinking of contemporary times, several academicians


like Leslie Fiedler resisted a blind alignment to the academia as the center, but
promoted the ‘popular’ in literary and cultural discourse. In his essay, “Toward
a Definition of Popular Literature” he considers “popular song and story, mostly
story” as popular literature. By popular literature Fiedler implies that literature
which has been “ghettoized” or excluded from university education, but has
endured on its own. Popular literature is not a category, a type, a sub-genre, or
the invention of the authors of the books, or authors who we have been taught to
believe belong to popular literature. In fact, the concept of popular literature
exists primarily … “in the perception of elitist critics – or better, perhaps, in their
misperception, their … deliberate misapprehension,” (Fiedler in Bigsby, 1975,
30). Let us now look at genres of Popular Literature next.

1.4.3 Genres of Popular Literature


One of the earliest genres that was relegated to the domain of popular literature
was the Romance. Kitchen maid romances often written by women were not
considered serious enough. The other prevalent romantic story narrated the
difficulties faced by two young people engaged in a forbidden love. The second
genre that found much favour with the populace was the fantasy. Children’s
Literature, the most famous story being Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll
is also considered as a representative fantasy, the other being science fiction.
Issac Asimov remains the master storyteller of these stories of scientific
adventures and make-believe kingdoms. In America it was the cowboy cult
stories, the Westerns, set in the frontier which were hugely popular with the
masses. These were tales of travel, power, male valour and discovery. Their rise
in the late 19th century coalesced with the popularity of the murder/ crime stories
or mysteries and spy fiction. With a detective in the centre, mysteries created
world famous characters such as Auguste Dupin by Edgar Allan Poe and Sherlock
Holmes by Arthur Conan Doyle. Yet, it is Agatha Christie who continues to
remain the queen of crime till today. In India, Satyajit Ray created his own
magic with the Feluda stories. The Spy Fiction as a genre was born with
Fennimore Cooper but further became popular with the creation of the figure
of James Bond by Ian Fleming in the mid 20th century. In recent times, popular
literature has embraced a variety of interesting new forms of writing such as
comic books, cartoon strips, terribly tiny tales, graphic novels etc which feed on
mythology, folk legends, fables and myths of the time. In the forthcoming units,
you shall be reading about them in much greater detail and through several
examples. We’ll move on to looking at the relationship if any between literary
merit and popular literature in the next subsection.

1.4.4 Inverse Relationship between Literary Merit and Popular


Literature
It is true that Popular Literature, as commodity literature is dependent upon the
‘free enterprise market place’ and often such literature cannot be stopped from
attaining market-place success. Such literature is denied to university classrooms
11
Popular Literature: An and libraries, because the notion floated by elitist critics is that the art form
Introduction
preferred by a majority of the people cannot be admirable and worthy of receiving
serious attention and cannot be admitted into academia. In many ways these so
called guardians of “good” taste “ghettoize” certain writers, even before reading
their works. Even librarians “ghettostack” these books as “Juveniles”, “Teenage
Fiction” or relegate some to a “super ghetto” called “Pornography”. Such books
are never even thought to be considered for any major prize, bemoans a bitter
Fiedler. He calls this an “untouchable category,” (Fiedler in Bigsby, 1975, 30-
31). But today, two decades into the 21st century, the borders that divide the pop
from the elite are merging. We will discuss this more in the next unit. Media too
plays a major role in creating hype and either taking a novel to its heights or to
the bottom of the stack. Let’s examine the role of media next.

1.4.5 Literature and Media


In the last two decades, a paradigm shift has been noticed, whereby a text has
been placed against various production apparatuses or other modes of
representations — cinema, stage, television, comic books, etc. If literature has to
fulfill its roles and purposes and be a communicative practice, the analysis of
popular narrative (fiction) can provide a crucial link between literature and culture.
In popular literature, a kinship with the other arts exists. So Popular Literature is
driven, often by the people, to lend itself to other forms of media. As mass
public culture, art practice and vehicle of propaganda, literary adaptations on
celluloid and cinema create an extended narrative text for the audience. Thus,
questions like— what happens to literature in cinema and can pedagogy remain
unaffected by its representations in cinema gains greater relevance now. It is true
that 50 % of the films today are based on popular literature. The classic examples
are Ian Fleming’s James Bond spy thrillers, furthering the myth of the white man
as the saviour of their race and also Bond as the iconic hero out to protect humanity
from evil - Russia or Germany, as the case may be. Even Agatha Christie, the
queen of crime, creates a discourse around the enigmatic Hercule Poirot to paint
a social landscape fraught with tensions and distrust, put up in a series of formulaic,
manipulative texts. However, when literature flows into other forms of Popular
Culture — films, soap operas, and comic books - sub-versions of different kinds
occur. Inventions take place in the form of violence and sex, contrarily, many
distortions also occur. One can continue with endless examples. Nonetheless, by
offering another mode of critical inquiry in the form of films or soap opera, the
modern world has forced us to re-look at the definition of the literary canon. Let
us look at Popular Literature today in the next subsection.

1.4.6 Popular Literature Today


A form of expression that was once considered folklore, folk song or people’s
literature, popular literature today attends to the call of a literate reading public
or media and technology ruled television and cinema, the force that frames it is
the market place. It responds to the question: What sells and why? Its consumers
may be the populace but its creators are often located within the walls of
scholarship and the academia. Writers like Chetan Bhagat, the creator of the
genre of campus novels, is able to capture the pulse of the youth today by giving
them narratives in which the same youth live and survive. The late 20th century
has seen a greater rise of formulaic fiction than ever before. Pandering to the
consumptive epoch of today, these popular fictionists deliver what is demanded
12
of them by the populace. Some of the Indian popular writers of today such as What is Popular Literature?
Surender Mohan Pathak, writing in Hindi are churning out crime stories by
the dozen. No longer, trashed as low brow literature, unworthy of literary attention
and critical gaze, popular literature today has gained a currency of its own. They
reside at not only the Wheeler kiosks at railway stations, bus stops, pavements
and the like, but they are now the subject of literary and academic conferences
and university curricula where their academic, literary, commercial and popular
merits are discussed and debated by scholars, publishers and editors. Though
the doyen of chick-lit, Advaita Kala and several of her kind would like to equally
claim academic space within the elite corridors, the reality is that there are no
such exclusive spaces available anymore. With distinctions of hierarchy and
genres and elite and pop blurring, popular literature today exists in meritorious
realms having invaded book shelves and must-read lists.

Part of the difficulty stems from the implied ‘otherness’, which is present / absent
when we use the term Popular Literature. Marc Angenot in Pawling’s Popular
Fiction and Social Change says, “Para literature occupies the space outside the
literary enclosure, as a forbidden taboo, a degraded product.” But this is also
true as said earlier that Literature has always mirrored the reality of the age it
belongs to. Thus, the 20th century witnessed the rise of the popular taste. It divests
“popular” outside the ambit of elite consciousness and links it with ordinary
people, the common masses.

Flash fiction has emerged as a significant form of literature that is being accepted
by the masses. Flash fiction as an idea – a story or poem written in minimal
words – has been present in literature for a long time, but its undeniable success
in the 21st century cannot be debated. When Ernest Hemmingway wrote “For
sale: baby shoes, never worn” it was applauded as a story with intense depth,
gravity and minimal expressions. Today, flash fiction has arrived. In the world of
long working hours and Kindle, flash fiction provides a unique reading experience.
Though this fiction does not promise the emotional depth of The Scarlett Letter
or the expansive thrill on the Mississippi of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,
this fiction creates a world where fiction became a means of entertainment more
than introspection. The themes that are touched upon in flash fiction were rooted
in the simple emotions that the readers could connect with without delving deep
into the complexities of the thematic emotion of the text.

The United States of America made significant contributions in the arena of


flash fiction with Narrative and Smith magazines that provided an opportunity
for people to publish flash fiction. India has captured the imagination of readers
on social media with the immensely popular Terribly Tiny Tales in 2013 with
Anuj Gosalia. Also commonly known as micro fiction it caters to writers who
wish to tell a story in the structured limits of 140 characters. Launched in 2016,
Mirakee is another writing mobile application which serves as a platform for
flash fiction writers. This application lets a writer embellish their writing in an
image form.  Mirakee has become an instrument which helps writers to explore
the realm of flash fiction.

The 21st century witnessed not just a celebration of Indian writing in English, but
the birth of a readership for racy, quick reads. In this neo-liberalised globalisation
in India, we witness the rise of a new kind of readers who have become an
increasingly emboldened social class. Commercial popular fiction was celebrated
with Chetan Bhagat’s Five Point Someone (2004), One Night at a Call Centre 13
Popular Literature: An (2008) and The 3 Mistakes of my Life (2008). Romance and Campus Fiction
Introduction
became the two genres that gave the Indian audience a literature that was
thoroughly Indian. Post 2000s, the new brigade of engineers or management
graduates-turned authors held the baton of commercial Indian fiction such as
Durjoy Datta who was not just a commercial author, but a social media person.
From attending literary fests, conferences, book signings, doing appearances
and book reading before and after the release of the book, the commercial author
is here to stay. An important role is therefore played by both, the publishing
houses and the authors who are increasingly involved in connecting to the masses
through various social media platforms. So in many ways, the popular in popular
fiction in the current age of technology mirrors the true image of the society and
the readers / the audience choose book covers, review books, post videos about
book signings and participate in the making of popular literature.

Check Your Progress 3


1) Draw the linkages of popular culture with the marketplace.
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
2) Write notes on:
i) Postmodernism
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
ii) Popular Culture and America
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
iii) Popular Literature and its forms
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
14
iv) Popular Literature Today What is Popular Literature?

..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................

1.5 LET US SUM UP


In this unit we have looked at the notion of what is culture, popular culture, mass
culture, and also looked at popular literature and what it means, and also looked
at some of the genres of popular literature. In the next unit, we shall look at the
notions of the canonical and the popular.

1.6 HINTS TO CHECK YOUR PROGRESS


Check your progress 1
1) Read Sections 1.1 and 1.2 carefully and then answer in your own words.
Check Your Progress 2
1) Read sections 1.2 and 1.3 carefully and then answer in your own words.
2) Read section 1.3 and all the subsections carefully and then answer in your
own words.
Check Your Progress 3
1) Read section 1.3.1 carefully and then answer in your own words.
2) i) Read section 1.4.1 carefully and then answer in your own words.
ii) Read section 1.3.4 carefully and then answer in your own words.
iii) Read section 1.4.3 carefully and then answer in your own words.
v) Read section 1.4.6 carefully and then answer in your own words.

1.7 GLOSSARY
Cultura : Latin word for ‘culture’ from the root colere, whichhas various
meanings: inhabit, cultivate, protect.
Populus : Greek word for ’people’
Mass Culture : The common people and their culture; popular culture that
appeals to the common man
Commodity : object or thing that can be bought or sold; commercial;
saleable.
Hegemony : authority, one-upmanship, power
Ghettoize : place in seclusion, reject

15
Popular Literature: An
Introduction 1.8 SUGGESTED READINGS & REFERENCES
Arnold, Matthew. Culture and Anarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1960.
Bakhtin, Mikhail. The Dialogic Imagination. Trans. C. Emerson and Michael
Holquist. Ed. Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981.
Bennett, Tony, 1981, Popular Culture: Themes and Issues (Part I), London, Open
University Press
Bennett, Tony, ed. Popular Fiction: Technology, Ideology, Production, Reading.
London: Routledge, 1990.
Bigsby, CWE Superculture: American Popular Culture and Europe. Bowling
Green, Ohio: Bowling Green University Popular Press, 1975
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Trans.
Richard Nice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard UP, 1984.
Browne, Ray B, 1973, Popular Culture and the Expanding Consciousness. New
York, Wiley
Fiedler, Leslie A., Cross the Border – Close the Gap, New York, Stein & Day
1972
—, What Was Literature?: Class, Culture and Mass Society, New York, Simon
& Schuster, 1982
—, “Giving the Devil His Due”, Journal of Popular Culture, Fall, 1978,pp197-
207
—, “Towards a Definition of Popular Literature”, Superculture: American
Popular Culture and Europe, Ed. CWE Bigsby, Bowling Green Ohio, Bowling
Green University Popular Press, 1975, pp 29-38
Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Trans. Quentin Hoare
and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. New York: International Publishers, 1971.
Srivastava Prem K “The Postmodern Condition and the Politics of the Popular.”
Creative Forum, Journal of Literary and Critical Writings. Bahri Publications,
New Delhi. Vol 16, No 1-2. Jan-Jun, 2003: 119-130
Storey, John, Cultural Theory and Popular Culture, London, Prentice Hall (An
Imprint of Pearson Education) 2001
Williams, Raymond, Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, Revised
ed, New York, Oxford University Press, 1985, pp 87-93

16

You might also like