Tadeusz Kantor - Writings

The Writings of Tadeusz Kantor 1956-1985
Author(s): Michal Kobialka

Source: The Drama Review: TDR , Autumn, 1986, Vol. 30, No. 3 (Autumn, 1986), pp. 114-
176
Published by: The MIT Press
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1145754
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Drama
Review: TDR
This content downloaded from

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Writings
of Tadeusz Kantor
1956-1985
Translated by Michal Kobialka
Trans. Note: One of the most fascinating elements in Tadeusz Kantor's

work as a theatre person is his theoretical and conceptual writing. While
working on a new project he writes essays, notes, and manifestos that
register his thought process as well as punctuate the consecutive stages in
the development of his theory of theatre. This record keeping is seminal
to Kantor and, as he himself has asserted, "every committed artist, who
undergoes a process of artistic development, constantly experiences its
various stages for which he has to provide different names." In the case of
Kantor, those stages of theoretical development are implemented in his
productions with Cricot 2 Theatre.
This selection of Kantor's theoretical writings has been determined
above all by the concern to present essays from various periods. They
offer a general overview of his artistic development, from about 1944
(The Ithaca of 1944 section in "The Infamous Transition") to 1985 ("Pris-
on" and "Reflection").
As translator, I would like to stress the fact that I wanted to reflect
Kantor's idiosyncratic language.' Therefore, some of the lines and meta-
phors may sound awkward in English. However, changing them into
idiomatic English would not have been true to Kantor's thinking.
In realizing this project I am greatly indebted to Tadeusz Kantor and
the Cricoteca archive; I take pleasure in acknowledging my gratitude to
them. I would also like to express my thanks to Barbara Gallati and Mark
Waren for their criticism of my translations, and to Professor Charles
Gattnig, without whose help the translation of the Italian entries in the
bibliography would not have been possible.
Michal Kobialka
Note
I. The Theatre of Death manifesto was translated by Voy T. and Margaret Stelmas-
zynski for Canadian Theatre Review CTR 16, Fall I977. Prison was translated by
Grazyna Branny for Kantor's program booklet sold at performances of Let the
Artists Die and edited by M. Kobialka.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
The Autonomous Theatre
I956/I963
1. The Autonomous Theatre:
I applied
the concept of the Autonomous Theatre
to two productions of
the Underground Experimental Theatre,
which were staged in
1942
and
1944,
as well as to the postwar productions
of the Cricot 2 Theatre
in I956, 1957, and I960.
The theatre which I call autonomous
is the theatre which is not
a reproductive mechanism,
i.e., a mechanism whose aim is to
present an interpretation of a piece of literature
on stage,
but a mechanism which
has its own independent
existence.
Due to the notion of unity
which is an inherent part of
a true work of art,
this concept,
which is as complex as the nature of theatre
and the creative process,
cannot be fully explained
unless all its germinal parts are defined.
At least, all the theatrical elements
must be integrated to a degree and
create a composite unit.
Because the term
the "highest"
(degree of integration)
does not mean anything
and thus leaves room for misunderstandings
let us label it
the zero (degree).
I do not apply the concept of
the autonomous theatre
to explain
the dramatic text, The relationship between
to translate it theatre and drama
into the language of theatre,
to interpret it
*The 1956 production of The Cuttlefish implemented this

manifesto was not published until 1963.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
I 6 Writings of Tadeusz Kantor
or find its new meanings.

The concept of the
autonomous theatre
is not a tool to
excavate the so-called
"stage equivalent"
which could be perceived
as a second parallel "action"
that is mistakenly called
autonomous.
I consider such interpretations

as naive stylizations.
I create such
reality,
such plots of events,
which have neither
logical,
analogical,
parallel,
nor juxtaposed
relationship with the drama;
and such forces
that could crush
an impregnable shell of
drama.
This can be achieved by
implementing shocks The meaning of a shock
and scandals.
Shock which is used in art
is not a means of
calming down the senses.
On the contrary:
it is a physical device to
break through
the petty,
universal,
practical philosophy of life of
modern man;
a device to unblock
the channels of his subdued
sphere of imagination;
to transfer "different" messages Different message
which are guarded against by his
pragmatism
and deliberation.
All celebrations
and "strange" actions of modern man
are nothing more than
empty and
pretentious
phraseology
piloting modern man
safely aground.
Modem theatre,

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
Writings of Tadeusz Kantor I17
1. Photos 1 through 12 are

of Kantor's 1975 production
in spite of new talents of The Dead Class
appearing sporadically; (Umarla klasa). (Photo by
in spite of false seriousness of its Gunther K. Kuhnel)
official representatives,
is dead,
academic,
and, at its best, entertaining
when it makes use of different
means that trigger excitement.
However, those means
push the theatre even further, toward the
ridiculous,
past styles and techniques;
the deserted plane;
and finally turn it into the prey of
private interest groups.
This theatre lacks
any ambition of
being "different";
the desire to
discover its definition and shape
in the analysis of the generations to come.
This theatre is sentenced to be erased from the memory.
2. The stage description:

A space which is Bankruptcy of theatre
small in size techniques
constitutes the stage.
Almost all of it is taken by
a huge pile of
deck-chairs which are

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
118 Writings of Tadeusz Kantor
similar;
weathered by wind and rain;
worn out;
useless;
randomly connected with a wire;
and put into motion;
Their movement could be described in terms of human psychology:
it is sudden,
furious,
nervous,
convulsive,
dying out,
uncoordinated,
ridiculous,
monotonous,
threatening.
It emits a
dull death rattle.
This huge object
has many functions:
to eliminate,
to push aside,
to work eternally
without any pattern and thought;
to perturb,
to look ridiculously funny and immensely tragic;
to fascinate; to draw us to it, and to push us aside.
I created an object Obj ect
whose utilitarian character

stands in opposition to its
new function, which creates this
oppressive and brutal
reality.
I assigned to it
a movement and function
which are absurd when compared with its original ones.
Having done so, I elevated it
to the plane of
ambiguous meanings and
disinterested functions,
that is, to the plane of
poetry.
The space which is left Against the spa Ice
to the performers
has nothing in common
with the space
which has fascinated theatre
for centuries.
This space nearly ceases to exist.
Its size could be equated with "zero."
It is so small and infinitesimal that
actors have to
fight from being
pushed aside.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
Writings of Tadeusz Kantor I 9
Circus is Circus
at the roots of this theatre.
Its comical,
sharp,
clownish
character, which
stretches beyond accepted life conventions,
is like a filter
through which human actions are
passed to remove
the particles that blur their perception and sharpness.
The actor in this uncompromising The Actor
arrangement
must reveal and relinquish his
clumsiness,
poverty,
and dignity
to the spectator.
He must appear
defenseless,
without safety
shields,
in front of the audience.
This realization of the "impossible" From the "impossible" to

is the strongest fascination the real
and the deepest secret
of art.
This realization is an act of our imagination
and of a sudden, spontaneous,
desperate decision to cling to
unprecedented,
absurd,
ridiculous,
possibilities which are beyond our imagination,
rather than to the process.
In order to create the magnetic field, to
pull the "impossible" into it,
one must lack experience,
be a rebel, be insatiable,
defy all the laws,
be in a state of
absolute emptiness.
Needless to say
one has to be in the grip of
the feeling of the "impossible."
Without this phenomenon
which escapes beyond the confines of common sense,
there would not be
any development.
The reproductive technique
of acting and
directing
is so strong a convention

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
that it is perceived as
the only one that is
true and in agreement
with the text.
In my last production (The Madman and the Nun)
a dramatic text The text
is not presented but
discussed,
commented upon;
the actors speak the lines,
reject them,
return to them,
and repeat them;
the parts are not assigned
thus, the actors do not identify with the text.
The performance turns into
a mill grinding the text-
Does the mill "interpret" the product which it grinds?
However, these sorts of questions and problems,
which are difficult and uneasy in terms of the old conventions,
are pointless in the arrangement I am suggesting.
All we have to do is to "construct the mill."
"Action" in the old naturalistic theatre
is always connected with
the progression of events of
the dramatic text.
The Elements of theatre:
"action"
and acting
rage blindly
through a narrow passage.
How naive and
poor
this method is.
All we have to do is to be able to see
in order to get to the heart of
the stage "action" of the
theatre elements. The text a nd action
In order not to destroy the text
during this process,
the text and the action must be exposed
This seems to be impossible to achieve
from the perspective of life's practical re
In art-and in this case
in theatre-
as a result of our action,
we will create a reality
whose elements will be loosely connected;
which will be easy to mold.
This act of nullification of actions,
of placing them in the state of weightlessness,
of juggling with them,
allows us to intertwine them with
pure theatrical activities,
which are elements of theatre.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
Writings of Tadeusz Kantor 121
The concept of the Zero Theatre

which, in preparing the spectacle,
fascinated me with its unlimited potentials,
is a manifestation
rather than a method.
Radical, even one-time changes The significance of
in art have a crucial significance radical actions in art
in its development:
they cleanse the atmosphere
from the false myths,
imaginary alternatives,
unresolved disputes,
and thus from the whole spectrum of speculations
that offer many solutions.
The concept of the zero theatre
embraces all elements of this rite of cleansing
and puts them
together under one headline.
the image
of modern
theatre
Modern theatre offers many
of those stylish nuances:
pseudo-naturalistic theatre 2. The Dead Class
stems from laziness
(1975). (Photo by Gunther
K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
and idleness
(in the times of Zola,
naturalism was exposed to
scathing criticism);
pseudo-expressionist theatre,
which, after the authentic
deformation of expressionism,
was left with nothing more than
a stylized, dead
grimace;
pseudo-surrealistic theatre
which makes use of deplorable
surrealist ornamentations that
resemble the taste of shop window designers;
theatre which does not want to take risks
and, having nothing to say, employs
moderate cultural policy that
is dressed up in eclectic elegance;
pseudo-modern theatre, which makes use
of various gimmicks taken out of different
fields of modern art.
In real life, reaching the zero state
means negation and destruction.
In art, the same process might give
3. The Dead Class totally different results.
(1975). (Photo by Gunther Reaching zero,

K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
destruction,
nullification of
phenomena, elements,
events,
relieves them of the
burden of leading
a practical life
and allows them
to turn into stage material
which is molded independently.
Translated from Teatr Autonomiczny. 1963. Krakow: Galeria Krzysztofory.
The Informel Theatre

I96I
After a long period of experiments on the new method of the i n fo r m e 1

theatre, the aim of which was to probe deeply into the structure of the
performance, Cricot 2 prepared Witkiewicz's In a Small Country House.
As in the case of Informel art of the time, the performance was an at-
tempt to touch upon MATTER and, subsequently, to define anew the
meaning of a human GESTURE and the decision-making process.
[The Informel Theatre] is a discovery of an unknown aspect of REALITY

or of its elementary state: MATTER which is
freed from abiding by the laws of reality,
always changing and fluid;
which escapes the bondage of rational definitions;
makes all attempts to compress it into a solid form,
ridiculous, helpless, and vain;
which is perennially destructive to all forms,
and nothing more than a manifestation;
which is accessible only through
the forces of destruction,
by whim and risk of a COINCIDENCE,
by fast and violent action.
[This discovery of] MATTER started a new adventure for art and human
consciousness.
Creating a method out of those speculations and applying it in theatre

would be nothing but a naive camouflage of the creative process by pseu-
do-scientific "laboratory experiments."
The theatre and art have to be born as a spontaneous act of creation.
Gradually, the new, homogenous "i n fo r m e 1" structure
has surfaced.
Even though the end result might appear to be similar, I have always
insisted on keeping it separated from surrealist or expressionist experi-
ments and their obsessions or exhibitionism.
This relentless elimination of the undesirable influences has been achieved

by rejecting shrewdly arranged psychological processes, states, and situa-

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
tions; by leaving them without providing final answers and resolutions,

in order to have them become helpless and ineffectualfacades.
A facade has unexpectedly become for me the outerform of reality in art.

And it was the fabric of reality which I have been trying to crush above
all. This act was my rescue from all false retreats. Besides, I have always
suspected that the realness of art was a cover for pretentious conceit. My
experiments lasted for a long time. The completely unexplored territory
was, I might say, "won" step by step.
Normal emotional states change imperceptibly into shreds of emotions

which are colored by
cruelty,
sadism,
spasm,
lust,
feverish ravings,
agonies.
These biological states,
which are extraordinarily intense,
lose touch with the sphere of everyday life
and become the matter of art.
This matiere brute is also attained in parole (speech).
It is primordial and crude;
it defies all classical conventions:
both those which are deformed by everyday language
and those which are reserved for the moments when the emotional states
attain feverish excitement; when words are mixed up and their meaning is
blurred; when the words defy the rules of classical syntax.
Human articulation resembles the remotest, the wildest forms (howling
of a pack of dogs), and the cruelest sounds (cracking of bones).
The Actors are crowded into an absurdly small
space of a wardrobe;
they are squeezed in between and mixed with dead objects (bags, a mass
of bags);
degraded, without dignity;
they are hanging motionless like clothes;
they are identified with the heavy mass of bags
(bags-emballages rank the lowest in the hierarchy of objects and as such
they easily become o bj e c t l e s s matter).
"Cons t r u c ting,"
the process of "designing and putting the project to life," is avoided.
The process [of constructing] is ridiculous!
Instead, ideally, the tendency becomes to have, for example, the form of
a costume shaped by ITSELF-by wearing, wearing out, destruction.
The remnants of objects, relics, "what has remained of them" will thus
have a chance to become the form!
Translated from "Teatr Informel" in Borowski, W. 1982. Tadeusz Kantor.

Warsaw: Wyd. Artystyczne i Filmowe, p. 145.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
The Zero Theatre or The Theatre of
Nullification
1963
i. The "Zero" Theatre:
(Fully) autonomous artistic endeavor (in theatre, I mean) does not exist
according to the principles or norms of everyday life. For this very reason
neither any positive nor negative value judgments can be applied to ap-
praise it.
The traditional techniques of plot development made use of human life as

a springboard for movement upward toward the realm of growing and
intensified passions, heroism, conflicts, and violent reactions.
When it first emerged, this idea of "growth" signified man's tragic ex-
pansion, or a heroic struggle to transcend human dimensions and desti-
nies. With the passing of time, it turned into a mere show requiring pow-
erful elements of a spectacle and the acceptance of violent and
irresponsible illusion; convincing shapes and a thoughtless procreation of
forms.
This pushy, morbidly inflamed, and pretentious form pushed aside the
object and thus what was "real." The entire process ended up in pathetic
pomposity.
4. The Dead Class

K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
The movement in the opposite direction: downward into the sphere below
THE ACCEPTED WAY OF LIFE,
which is possible by elimination,
destruction,
misshaping,
reduction of energy,
cooling;
[the movement] in the direction of emptiness,
DEFORMITY,
non-form
is an ILLUSION-CRUSHING process
and the only chance to touch upon reality!
The symptoms of this process are momentous:
Pragmatic forms of life cease to be binding,
a creative process loses its sacred status and allegedly its only function-
to create-which has become nothing more than a burden.
An object loses the meanings which were thoughtlessly assigned to it,
its symbolism-
and reveals its
autonomous
empty (according to standard opinions) existence.

The creative process becomes
the realization of the impossible.
Theatre, which I have called the "Zero" Theatre, does no
ready-made "zero" situation. Its essence lies in the proce
WARD THE EMPTINESS AND "ZERO ZONES."
This process means
dismembering logical plot structures,
building up scenes not by textual reference but
by reference to
associations triggered by them,
juggling with CHANCE or
junk,
ridiculously trivial matters,
which are embarrassingly shameful,
devoid of any meaning
and consequence;
by showing indifference toward
the importance of matters,
the meaning of facts,
emotions;
by invalidation;
elimination of stimuli and portents of livelier activity;
"defusion,"
"discharge" of energy;
by cooling temperature and expression,
use of awkward silences and inaction,
the dilution of
setting structures,
universal decomposition of
forms;
by the cracking of mechanism,
"jamming,"
slowing of pace,

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
loss of rhythm,
repetition,
elimination through noise,
stupidity,
cliches,
automatic action,
terror;
by disinformation,
withholding information,
dissecting plot,
decomposing acting;
by acting poorly,
acting "on the sly,"
acting "non-acting"!
These actions
are accompanied by
specific mental states-
on the condition that these actions are neither independent of nor trig-
gered by these states.
These actions are appearances of specific mental states rather than the
symptoms of cause and effect.
These mental states are
isolated, groundless, autonomous.
And as such they can be perceived as the factors influencing artistic
creation.
Here are some of them:
apathy,
melancholy,
exhaustion,
amnesia,
dissociation,
neurosis,
depression,
unresponsiveness,
frustration,
minimalization,
distraction,
boredom,
impotence,
sluggishness,
tearfulness,
senility,
sclerotic or
maniacal states,
schizophrenia,
misery . . .
2. Notes on the "Zero" Theatre:
Let us try to list some of the life conditions which are charged with in-
tense emotion and deep meaning . ..
LOVE, JEALOUSY, LUST, PASSION, GREED, CUNNING, COW-
ARDICE, REVENGE, MURDER, SUICIDE, WAR, HEROISM,
FEAR, SUFFERING...

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
For a long time, this "highly inflammable" material has served theatre
and art as a primary source for literary plots, dramatic action, peripeteias,
conflicts, and sensational denouements.
Its inherent characteristics to expand and defuse [plots] have determined the
choice of formal means of expression, which of course were of a similar
nature and effect:
expressio n,
mo d in g,
fo r m,
ill u s i o n,
naturalistic a p p roach to life,
"fi gurativeness..."
This system of expansion, its values and flaws, is well kno

What happens if its means of expression, which almost u
identified with the nature and essence of art or which have b
as the highest and mandatory formulas, become bereft of
corollary of this newly achieved passive state, the whole im
pilation or index of signs of life will change into an empty
The moment we reject the formal means which are impoten
the moment we reject illusion,
the automatic reproductive apparatus,
fictitious plots representing life,
and raise questions concerning the concept of
form and molding,
5. The Dead Class i

K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
all this baggage of old meaning and depth,

-"above zero"-
proves useless.
All our sensitivity then is directed to such states as:
reluctance,
unwillingness,
apathy,
monotony,
indifference,
minimalization,
ridicule,
banality,
ordinariness,
emptiness . ..
These states are the states of disinterestedness.
And this is what we want to achieve.
3. Non-acting:
Is the state of
non-acting possible
(that is, if we take for granted the existence of a stage
and a play, la piece, das Stuck)?
Is this state of non-acting possible,
even though the stage automatically imposes upon us its identification as
a place to act and
a play as a genre which is meant to be acted?
This obtrusive question
has long been associated in my work
with the wish (which might seem to be the portent of
maniacal eccentricity,
or stubborn pedantry)
to achieve
full autonomy of the theatre;
so that everything that happens on stage
would become an event-
perhaps a different one from
those that occur in the audience's spatial and temporal reality of life-but
still an event with
its own life and consequences rather than an artificial one.
I wish for a situation
in which one could discard the so-called "acting"
(supposedly the only way for an actor to behave "on stage"),
which is nothing more than
naive pretense,
exulted mannerism,
irresponsible illusion!
This wish could be fulfilled by an actor who rejects illusion as a point of

reference to the text and stays on the plane of his own "Self"; his INDI-
VIDUALITY does not extend beyond it in order to create the illusion of
being another character. Having done so, he would eliminate dependence
on the arrangement which exists outside of him, gain autonomy and ex-
pose only himself, and his own character which is the only reality on
stage.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
He would create his own chain of events, states, situations which would
either clash with those in the play or be somehow completely isolated
from them.
This seems impossible to achieve.
However, those attempts to cross over this borderline of the IMPOSSI-
BILITY are fascinating.
On the one hand, there is the reality of the text,

on the other hand, the actor and his behavior.
Two parallel systems which
are neither dependent
nor reflect each other.
The actor's "behavior" should
"p a r a 1 y z e" the reality of the text,
be juxtaposed to it.
If this happens:
the reality of the text will be
relieved of its questionable ally, the actor (questionable because it is ren-
dered only through him), and
become independent, (also) autonomous,
and concrete.
4. Anti-activity:
Actors become deeply

d i s c o u r a g e d.
They show a sudden
"u n w i 11 i n g n e s s" to act
and an embarrassing "interest in the audience."
They alter the function of and the relationship between actors and audi-
ences in an unnatural and contemptuous way. The audience, which has
been a forbidden object of interest and attention,
triggers in them responses of infinite variety and nuance which include:
n o n c h a a n c e,
c o n t e m p t and
d i s g u s t.
Then they return to the text, but they deal with it in a way which is also
fo r b i d d e n:
they repeat some lines,
dissect the meaning of words, analyze and appraise them critically,
with suspicion,
with doubt,
disapprove of them,
mock and
RIDICULE them,
or they DON'T UNDERSTAND the text,
treat it as an ALIEN entity,
try to fathom its meaning,
to put it together,
fit its elements together, compare it, analyze it linguistically,
but, finally, when they realize the futility of their actions,
they di s c a r d it
and suddenly forget about it.
They g i v e up.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
And then submerge in the feeling of

a p a t h y,
mel a n c h o ly,
d e p r e s s i o n.
They are absorbed in
thought.
N u m b n e s s engulfs them.
But this reverie can either be due to exercising the intellect
or, it might be caused by their dullness
and complete vanity.
They behave as if they were in private.
An e m b a r r a s s i n g d i s r e g a r d for the audience.
"An empty stare" into the space.
A sudden recollection of something.
A sudden interest in inconsequential details, or trivial matters.
(The rubbing of a non-existent spot.)
A careful examination of a piece of string or something insignificant.
And then again deliberation.
A desperate attempt to recapture a lost theme.
Resignation.
And so on, indefinitely,
until boredom and
insanity strike . . .
5. Surreptitious Acting:
Counteract "open" acting,

which has become completely ineffective and almost shameless by its uni-
versal acceptance,
6. The Dead Class

K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
with acting "on the sly."

Actors perform in the place
which is the least suitable!
They are hidden behind
noisy, conventional, and stupid events
which are brought to the fore.
Actors are humiliated by
the act of pushing them "behind."
They perform as if "in spite."
They are relegated to outlaw status.
Actors, who are being extirpated by the events which are "official" and
featured,
give way and leave
to look for the last ray of hope,
the last patch of land
where they try to "make a statement"
quickly, as quickly as possible,
before the final extermination.
6. Erasing:
Erasing is a method which
is often used in art.
The old Masters knew it well.
I am thinking about paintings. I am thinking about situations in which
erasing is visible
and meaningful.
I passionately used this method in the Informel Art.
When too many distracting densities of form were squeezed into
some part of a painting
I could erase them in one move-
to the naught,
to nothingness which devoured those protruding parts.
One could say that this movement of the hand was cruel,
that it condemned, wrought destruction, and eliminated those forms
from the face of the earth.
But those areas of nothingness and silence have jealously guarded the
secrets of the past epochs.
The act of erasing could also be equated with the simple act of
cleaning up,
of leaving the center of the room cleanly swept by
pushing litter and other rubbish against the walls or into the corne
and thus depriving them of any meaning. We are just a step awa
the time when this act of e r a s i n g can be transferred onto th
7. Internalization of expression:
"Expressive" states appear

suddenly, caused by
some "scratches."
They build up.
Excitement, agitation, anxiety,
fury, rage, frenzy.
Suddenly, they cave in, disappear

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
as if sucked in
and only empty gestures remain.
8. Minimalization. Economy of movement and emotion:

Inertness as defense.
Actors try to
adjust to minimal
living conditions
by economizing on their vital powers,
by limiting their movements to the minimum,
by not showing their emotions,
(as does a mountaineer
who holds onto the rock on a narrow path).
A ridiculous economy of movement.
Caution.
Every response is calculated and
measured out.
Intense concentration and
awareness that each additional violent sign of life
might lead to instant death.
9. Reduction of meanings as to the zero state:
Reduce meanings
to merely phonetic values,
juggle with words
to bring up their other meanings,
"dissolve" their content,
loosen their logical bonds,
repeat.
lo. Elimination by force:

The Death Machine
(a shapeless construct made out of decrepit chairs)
shoves the actors aside, throws them "out,"
exterminates
by its sudden, robot-like movements.
There remains a ridiculously small space for
acting and living. Actors resist
being pushed aside,
try to keep their balance and cling to the surface
as does a drowning man; wage a hopeless struggle
but fall off.
11. Embarrassing situations:
Replace a shock with an embarrassing

situation.
An embarrassing situation is something more

than a shock.
To do so, one requires much
courage,

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
courage to take risks,

the ability to make decisions.
An embarrassing situation destroys the audience's
life experience, its conventionally validated existence,
and puts it "down"
much more effectively than a shock.
12. Automation:
The nature of an automatic activity

is defined by its constant repetition.
After some time, this repetition completely deprives
both the activity and the object of their meaning.
Their "life" meaning, of course.
Now they can easily be manipulated.
13. Acting under duress:

Actors are forced,
flattered,
admonished,
scolded,
tormented,
terrorized to act.
This duress is inflicted upon them by
two "additional" characters,
unquestionable villains,
who are dumb and stupid,
sad clowns,
who are half-janitor and half-thug,
cruel persecutors,
brutal and blunt tools,
thoughtless automatons
who change easily, if required,
into devout moralists, strict
mentors,
dumb interpreters,
pimps,
soul collectors,
and sadists.
14. Emballage:
A huge, black "emballage"

is the final and radical
tool of complete
extermination.
Translated from "Teatr Zerowy" in Borowski, W. 1982. Tadeusz Kantor.

Warsaw: Wyd. Artystyczne i Filmowe, pp. 148-150.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
THEATRE HAPPENING
(Theatre of Events)
apropos of the performance of
The Water-Hen
1967
I do not treat theatre as a fenced-off or professional field. Contempo-
rary art undergoes multiple changes, which introduce radical reevalua-
tions, eruption of new forms, destruction of the old; which are seemingly
absurd, trigger hatred, disapproval, mockery, or humiliation; which are
prohibited; which are simultaneously perceived as shallow and profound;
which are being forged by transient fashion, misapplication, and dilettant-
ism; which are a mirror to the ideas that originated in the 20th century
and the facts that regenerate tirelessly the condition of human awareness.
One should know of those changes and probe deeply into their compli-
cated mechanisms. Furthermore, one should take risks, create, and par-
ticipate in the process of initiating those changes. If they are not intro-
duced, nothing more than conventional and uncommitted forms will be
created.
Today's theatre is impregnated by conformity. It tends to ignore all
those changes (for reasons which are well known) and hide itself behind
professional or academic studies which, in the context of those changes,
seem a disturbing limitation, scholastic, provincial, and ridiculous. From
time to time, this theatre puts a veil around us and tricks us into believing
that it embarks on an adventurous trip into the forbidden zone. However,
when back, it turns the living forms, which it has stolen, into dead props.
In spite of the opinions of the opportunists; of all those half-dead per-
sonalities whose position is entrenched by their titles, or pseudo-intellec-
tual aesthetes, THE AVANT-GARDE IS POSSIBLE AND WILL AL-
WAYS EXIST IN THEATRE. Today's Cricot 2 does not transfer the
experiments of visual art onto the stage floor. Its aim is to create and
7. The Dead Class

K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
safeguard the existence of FREE AND DISINTERESTED ARTISTIC

EXPRESSION. All conventional barriers separating the arts have been
removed. An artist does not change this mundane, everyday reality with
the help of his intuition or imagination but he simply takes and sets it
ablaze. In this process, he keeps changing his condition and function; al-
ternately and simultaneously, he becomes a victor and a victim! For the
last few decades the noble conditions, in which art has been created, have
systematically and with consequence been impaired by: MOVEMENT,
AUTOMATIZATION, COINCIDENCE, DEFORMITY, AMBIGU-
ITY OF DREAMS, DESTRUCTION, COLLAGES, etc.
As a result of this process there occurred a CRISIS OF FORM, that is
the crisis of the concept that art should be the outcome of a maximum
condensation of artistic activities such as forming, molding of form
branding, gutting, anointing, constructing, and building.
To a certain degree, the butcher-like act of the creation of the artist
ridiculed. However, it introduces a new perception of an object.
Having gone through the deformed and sputtering matter of Inform
and touched upon the nothingness and the zero zone, one reaches the
object "from behind," where the distinction between reality and art do
not exist. Today's art has rediscovered an object and held it in its hands
if a ball of fire. Therefore any questions of how to express or interpret th
object seem too long, pedantic, and ridiculous in the context of this un
precedented situation.
The object simply exists. This statement has irrevocably depreciate
the notions of: expression, interpretation, metaphor, and similar device
In my treatment of The Water-Hen, I have tried to avoid an unnecessar
construction of elements. I have introduced into it not only objects bu
also their characteristics, and READY-MADE events which were already
molded. Thus, my intervention was dispensable. An object ought to b
won over and possessed rather than depicted or shown. What a marvel
ous difference! Important and unimportant, mundane, boring, conven
tional events and situations constitute the heart of reality. I derail them
from the track of realness (The Zero Theatre Manifesto, 1963), give the
autonomy, which, in life, is called aimlessness, and deprive them of an
motivation and effects. I keep turning them around, re-create them indef
nitely, until they begin to have a life of their own; until they begin t
fascinate us.
Then such questions as "Is this already art?" or "Is this still reality?"
become inconsequential to me.
The dramatic text is also a "ready-made object" which has been forme
outside of the zone of performance and the audience's reality. It is a
object which has been found; an object whose structure is dense and it
identity is delineated by its own fiction, illusion, and psycho-physic
dimension.
I treat it in much the same way as I treat other events and objects in th
production. Caution: The terminology which has been used in the play
autonomous. It would be fallacious to apply it in order to draw concl
sions concerning life. Chaos, destruction, disintegration, zero, anti-con
struction, order, automatism, brutality, perversion, obsession are th
names of means and processes which are on equal footing in the arts an
have neither negative nor positive coloring as do their counterparts in lif
Translated from "Teatr Happening" in Borowski, W. 1982. Tadeusz Kanto

Warsaw: Wyd. Artystyczne i Filmowe, p. 153.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
8. The Dead Class
K. Kuhnel)
9. The Dead Class

K. Kuhnel)
The Theatre Of Death

I975
i. Craig's Postulate: to bring back the marionette. Eliminate the live

actor. Man-a creature of nature-is a foreign intrusion into the
abstract structure of a work of art.
According to Gordon Craig, somewhere along the banks of the Ganges

two women forced their way into the shrine of the Divine Marionette,
which was jealously hiding the secrets of the true THEATRE. They en-
vied the ROLE of this Perfect Being in illuminating human intellect with
the sacred feeling of the existence of God, its GLORY; they spied on its
Movements and Gestures, its sumptuous attire and, by cheap parody,

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
began to satisfy the vulgar taste of the mob. At the moment when they
finally ordered a similar monument built for themselves-the modern
theatre, as we know it only too well and as it has lasted to this day, was
born. A clamorous Public Service Institute. With it appeared the AC-
TOR. In defense of his theory Craig cites the opinion of Eleanora Duse:
"to save the theatre, it must be destroyed, it is necessary for all actors
and actresses to die of plague . . . for it is they who render art impossi-
ble ... "
2. Craig's Version: Man-the actor ousts the marionette, tak

thereby causing the demise of the theatre.
There is something very impressive in the stand taken by the g

an, when he says: "In all seriousness I demand the return to the
the imagination of the super-marionette . . . and when it ap
will again, as before, be able to worship the happiness of Exi
render divine and jubilant homage to DEATH...." Craig, i
the aesthetics of SYMBOLISM, considered man to be subject
dictable emotions, passions, and consequently to chance as a
completely foreign to the homogenous nature and structure o
art, which destroys its principal trait: cohesion.
Not only Craig's idea but also that whole elaborate progra
bolism-impressive in its own time-had in the Igth century t
of isolated and unique phenomena announcing a new era an
Heinrich von Kleist, Ernst Theodor Amadeus Hoffman, E
Poe. . . . One hundred years earlier, Kleist, for the same reaso
demanded the substitution of the actor by the marionette; he r
human organism, which is subject to the laws of NATURE, a
intrusion into Artistic Fiction, based on the principle of Constr
Intellect. This accounts for his reproaches stressing the limited
of man and charges of an incessantly controlling conscious
excludes the concepts of grace and beauty.
3. From the romantic mysticism of mannequins and the artific

of man in the XIX century-to the rationalism of XX cent
stract thought.
On what seemed to be the safe road traversed by the man of

ment and Rationalism there appears out of the darkness, sud
increasingly greater numbers, DOUBLES, MANNEQ
TOMATONS, HOMUNCULI. Artificial creations, a mock
creatures of NATURE, bearers of absolute degradation,
dreams, DEATH, Horror and Terror. There is born a faith i
known powers of MECHANICAL MOVEMENT, a maniac
for the invention of a MECHANISM surpassing in perfection
ity the human organism and all its weaknesses.
And all this with an aura of demonism, on the brink of cha

illegal practices, magic, transgression and nightmare. This w
ENCE FICTION of those days, in which the demonic human
ated ARTIFICIAL MAN.
At the same time all of this signified an abrupt loss of faith in N

TURE and in that realm of man's activity which was closely tied wi

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
nature. Paradoxically, from these extremely romantic and diabolical ef-

forts to take away nature's right of creation-there evolved a movement
increasingly independent and more and more dangerously distant from
NATURE-A RATIONALISTIC, even MATERIALISTIC MOVE-
MENT of a "WORLD OF ABSTRACTION," CONSTRUCTIVISM,
FUNCTIONALISM, MACHINISM, ABSTRACTION, finally PUR-
IST VISUALISM, recognizing only the "physical presence" of a work of
art. This risky hypothesis, whose origin is none too attractive for an age
of technology and scientism, I take upon my conscience and for my per-
sonal satisfaction.
4. Dadaism, introducing "ready-made reality," elements of life, destroys

the concepts of homogeneity and cohesion in a work of art, as postulat-
ed by symbolism, Art Nouveau, and Craig.
But let us return to Craig's marionette. Craig's idea of replacing the live
actor with a mannequin-an artificial and mechanical creation-for the
sake of preserving perfect cohesion in a work of art, is today invalid.
Later experience destroyed the unity of structure in a work of art by

introducing FOREIGN elements in collages and assemblages; the accep-
tance of "ready-made" reality, full recognition of the role of CHANCE,
and the placing of a work of art on the sharp borderline between the
REALITY OF LIFE AND ARTISTIC FICTION-made irrelevant those
io. The Dead Class

K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
scruples from the beginning of this century, from the period of Symbol-
ism and Art Nouveau. The two possible solutions-either autonomous
art and intellectual structure, or naturalism-ceased to be the ONLY
ones. When the theatre, in its moments of weakness, submitted to the
live organism of man and his laws-it automatically and logically agreed
to the form or imitation of life, its presentation and re-creation. In the
opposite circumstances, when the theatre was strong and independent
enough to free itself from the pressure of life and man, it created artificial
equivalents to life which turned out to be more alive, because they sub-
mitted easily to the abstractions of space and time and were capable of
achieving absolute unity.
Today these possibilities are neither appropriate nor valid alternatives.
For a new situation and new conditions have arisen in art. The appearance
of the concept of READY-MADE REALITY, extracted from life-and
the possibilities of ANNEXING it, INTEGRATING it into a work of
art through DECISION, GESTURE or RITUAL-has become a fascina-
tion much stronger than (artificially) CONSTRUED reality, than the cre-
ation of ABSTRACTION, or the surrealistic world, than Breton's MI-
RACULOUSNESS. Happenings, Events and Environments with their
colossal momentum, have achieved the rehabilitation of whole regions of
REALITY, disdained until this time, cleansing it of the ballast of life's
intentions.
This "DECALAGE" of life's reality, its derailment from life's prac-

tices, moved the human imagination more strongly than the surrealistic
reality of dreams. As a result, fears of direct intervention by life and man
in the scheme of art-became irrelevant.
5. From the "Ready-Made Reality" of the happening-to the demater-

ialization of the elements of a work of art.
However, as with all fascination so too this one, after a time, was trans-
formed into a convention practiced universally, senselessly, and in a vul-
gar manner. These almost ritualistic manipulations of Reality, connected
as they are with the contestation of ARTISTIC STATUS and the PLACE
reserved for art, gradually started to acquire different sense and meaning.
The material, physical PRESENCE of an object and PRESENT TIME,
the only possible context for activity and action-turned out to be too
burdensome, had reached their limits. The TRANSGRESSION signified:
depriving these conditions of their material and functional IMPOR-
TANCE, that is, of their COMMUNICATIVENESS. Because this is
the latest period, still current and not yet closed, the observations which
follow derive from and are tied with my own creativity.
The object (The Chair, Oslo, 1970) became empty, deprived of expres-
sion, connections, references, characteristics of programmed communication,
its "message"; directed "nowhere," it changed into a dummy.
Situations and activities were locked into their own CIRCUMFER-
ENCE: the ENIGMATIC (theatre of the impossible, 1973), in my m
festo entitled "Cambriollage," followed the unlawful INTRUSION
that terrain where tangible reality was transformed into its INVIS
EXTENSIONS. The role of THOUGHT, memory, and TIME beco
increasingly clear.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
6. The rejection of the orthodoxy of conceptualism and the "Official

Avant-garde of the Masses."
The certitude impressed itself upon me more and more strongly that the
concept of LIFE can be vindicated in art only through the ABSENCE OF
LIFE in its conventional sense (again Craig and the Symbolists!), this pro-
cess of DEMATERIALIZATION SETTLED on a path which circum-
vented in my creative work the whole orthodoxy of linguistics and con-
ceptualism. This was probably caused in part by the colossal throng
which arose on this already official course and which will unfortunately
become the latest installment of the DADAIST current with its slogans of
TOTAL ART, EVERYTHING IS ART, ALL ARE ARTISTS, ART IS
IN THE MIND, etc.
I hate crowds. In 1973 I wrote a draft of a new manifesto which takes
into consideration this false situation. This is its beginning:
"From the time of Verdun, Voltaire's Cabaret, and Marcel Duchamp's

Water-Closet, when the 'status of art' was drowned out by the roar of Fat
Bertha-DECISION became the only remaining human possibility, the
reliance on something that was or is unthinkable, functioning as the first
stimulant of creativity, conditioning and defining art. Lately thousands of
mediocre individuals have been making decisions, without scruples or
any hesitation whatever. We are witnesses of the banalization and conven-
tionalization of decision. This once dangerous path has become a com-
fortable freeway with improved safety measures and information.
Guides, maps, orientation tables, directional signs, signals, centres, Art
Co-operatives guarantee the excellence of the functioning of creativity.
We are witnesses of the GENERAL MOVEMENT of artist-commandos,
street fighters, artist-mediators, artist-mailmen, epistologs, pedlars, street
magicians, proprietors of Offices and Agencies. Movement on this al-
ready official freeway, which threatens with a flood of graphomania and
deeds of minimal significance, increases with each passing day. It is neces-
sary to leave it as quickly as possible. This is not easily done. Particularly
at the apogee of the UNIVERSAL AVANT-GARDE-blind and favored
with the highest prestige of the INTELLECT, which protects both the
wise and the stupid.
7. On the side streets of the official avant-garde. Mannequins appear.
My deliberate rejection of the solutions of conceptualism, despite the fact

that they seemed to be the only way out from the path upon which I had
embarked, resulted in my placing the above-mentioned facts of the latest
stage of my creativity and attempts to describe them, on side streets
which left me more open to the UNKNOWN!!!
I have more confidence in such a situation. Any new era always begins
with actions of little apparent significance and little note, incidents having
little in common with the recognized trend, actions that are private, inti-
mate, I would even say-shameful. Vague. And difficult! These are the
most fascinating and essential moments of creativity.
All of a sudden I became interested in the nature of MANNE-

QUINS.
The mannequin in my production of THE WATER-HEN 1967 and

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
II. The Dead Class

K. Kuhnel)
the mannequins in THE SHOEMAKERS 1970 had a very specific

role: they were like a non-material extension, a kind of ADDI-
TIONAL ORGANfor the actor, who was their "master." The man-
nequins already widely used in my production of Slowacki's Balla-
dyna were DOUBLES of live characters, somehow endowed with a
higher CONSCIOUSNESS, attained "after the completion of their
lives."
These mannequins were already clearly stamped with the sign of

DEATH.
8. The mannequin as manifestation of "REALITY OF T

LO WEST ORDER." The mannequin as dealings of
TRANSGRESSION. The mannequin as dealings of
TRANSGRESSION. The mannequin as EMPTY obj
DUMMY. A message of DEATH. A model for the act
The mannequin I used in 1967 in the Cricot 2 Theatre (Th
was a successor to the "Eternal Wanderer" and "Human Em
one which appeared naturally in my "Collections" as yet a
nomenon consistent with my long-held conviction that only t
the lowest order, the poorest and least prestigious objects a
revealing their full objectivity in a work of art.
Mannequins and Wax Figures have always existed on the p

sanctioned Culture. They were not admitted further; they o
in FAIR BOOTHS, suspicious MAGICIANS' CHAMBERS
the splendid shrines of art, treated condescendingly as CU
intended for the tastes of the masses. For precisely this reason
and not academic, museum creations, which caused the cur
at the blink of an eye.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
I2. The Dead Class

K. Kuhnel)
MANNEQUINS also have their own version of TRANSGRESSION.

The existence of these creatures, shaped in man's image, almost "godless-
ly," in an illegal fashion, is the result of heretical dealings, a manifestation
of the Dark, Nocturnal, Rebellious side of human activity. Of Crimes
and Traces of Death as sources of recognition. The vague and inexplica-
ble feeling that through this entity so similar to a living human being but
deprived of consciousness and purpose there is transmitted to us a terrify-
ing message of Death and Nothingness-precisely this feeling becomes
the cause of-simultaneously-that transgression, repudiation and attrac-
tion. Of accusation and fascination. All arguments have been exhausted in
accusations. The very mechanism of action called their attention to itself,
that mechanism which, if taken as the purpose, could easily be relegated
to the lower forms of creativity! IMITATION AND DECEPTIVE
SIMILARITY, which serve the conjurer in setting his TRAPS and fool-
ing the viewer, the use of "unsophisticated" means, evading the concepts
of aesthetics, the abuse and fraudulent deception of APPEARANCES,
practices from the realm of charlatans.
To make matters complete, the entire proceedings were accompanied

by a philosophical world-view which, from the time of Plato to this day,
often regards as the purpose of art the unmasking of Being and a Spiritual
Sense of Existence and not involvement in the Material Shell of the
world, in that faking of appearances which are the lowest stage of being.
I do not share the belief that the MANNEQUIN (or WAX FIGURE)
could replace the LIVE ACTOR, as Kleist and Craig wanted. This would
be too simple and naive. I am trying to delineate the motives and intent
of this unusual creature which has suddenly appeared in my thoughts and
ideas. Its appearance complies with my ever-deepening conviction that it
is possible to express life in art only through the absence of life, through an
appeal to DEATH, through APPEARANCES, through EMPTINESS
and the lack of a MESSAGE.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
The MANNEQUIN in my theatre must become a MODEL, through

which pass a strong sense of DEATH and the conditions of the DEAD.
A model for the live ACTOR.
9. My elucidation of the situation described by Craig. The appearance o

the LIVE ACTOR as a revolutionary moment. The discovery of the
IMAGE OF MAN.
I derive my observations from the domain of the theatre, b

relevant to all current art. We can suppose that Craig's sugg
picted and disastrously-incriminating picture of the circums
rounding the appearance of the Actor-was composed for his
a point of departure for his idea of the "SUPER-MARION
spite the fact that I remain an admirer of Craig's magnificen
and passionate accusations (especially since I see before me t
downfall of today's theatre) and then only after my full accept
first part of his Credo, in which he denies the institutionalized
reason for artistic existence-I dissociate myself from his ren
sions on the fate of the ACTOR.
For the moment of the ACTOR's first appearance before the HOUS
(to use current terminology) seems to me, on the contrary: revolutionar
and avant-garde. I will even try to compile and "ascribe to History" a
completely different picture, in which the course of events will have
meaning quite the opposite ... ! From the common realm of customar
and religious rituals, common ceremonies and common people's activitie
13. Kantor's drawing for

The Dead Class (1975):
"An old man- :
exhibitionist." : ::::-:;

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
advanced SOMEONE, who made the risky decision to BREAK with the
ritualistic Community. He was not driven by conceit (as in Craig) to
become an object of universal attention. This would have been too sim-
plistic. Rather it must have been a rebellious mind, sceptical, heretical,
free and tragic, daring to remain alone with Fate and Destiny. If we also
add "with its ROLE," we will then have before us the ACTOR. This
revolt took place in the realm of art. Said event, or rather manifestation,
probably caused much confusion of thought and clashing of opinions.
This ACT was undoubtedly seen as a disloyalty to the old ritualistic tradi-
tions and practices, as secular arrogance, as atheism, as dangerous subver-
sive tendencies, as scandal, as amorality, as indecency; people must have
seen in it elements of clownery, buffoonery, exhibitionism and deviation.
The author himself, set apart from society, gained for himself not only
implacable enemies, but also fanatical admirers. Condemnation and glory
simultaneously. It would be guilty of a ludicrous and shallow formalism
to interpret this act of SEVERANCE (RUPTURE) as egotism, as a lust
for glory or latent inclinations toward acting. It must have implied some-
thing much greater, a MESSAGE of extraordinary import. We will try to
illustrate this fascinating situation: OPPOSITE those who remained on
this side there stood a MAN DECEPTIVELY SIMILAR to them, yet (by
some secret and ingenious "operation") infinitely DISTANT, shockingly
FOREIGN, as if DEAD, cut off by an invisible BARRIER-no less hor-
rible and inconceivable, whose real meaning and THREAT appears to us
only in DREAMS. As though in a blinding flash of lightning, they sud-
denly perceived a glaring, tragically circus-like IMAGE OF MAN, as if
they had seen him FOR THE FIRST TIME, as if they had seen THEIR
VERY SELVES. This was certainly a shock-a meta-physical shock, we
might even say. The live effigy of MAN emerging out of the shadows, as
if constantly walking ahead of himself, was the dominant MESSAGE of
its new HUMAN CONDITION, only HUMAN, with its RESPONSI-
BILITY, its tragic CONSCIOUSNESS, measuring its FATE on an in-
exorable and final scale, the scale of DEATH. This revelatory MES-
SAGE, which was transmitted from the realm of DEATH, evoked in the
VIEWERS (let us now call them by our own term) a metaphysical shock.
And the reference to DEATH, to its tragic and MENACING beauty,
were the means and art of that ACTOR (also according to our own
terminology).
It is necessary to re-establish the essential meaning of the relationship:

VIEWER and ACTOR.
IT IS NECESSARY TO RECOVER THE PRIMEVAL FORCE OF

THE SHOCK TAKING PLACE AT THE MOMENT WHEN OPPO-
SITE A MAN (THE VIEWER) THERE STOOD FOR THE FIRST
TIME A MAN (THE ACTOR) DECEPTIVELY SIMILAR TO US
YET AT THE SAME TIME INFINITELY FOREIGN, BEYOND AN
IMPASSABLE BARRIER.
lo. RECAPITULATION
Despite the fact that we may be suspected and even accused

of a certain scrupulousness, inappropriate under the circumstances,
in destroying inborn prejudices and fears,
for the sake of a more precise picture
and possible conclusions

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
14. Kantor's drawing for r
The Dead Class (1975):-
"An old man in the WC."
let us establish the limits of that boundary, which hasname:

the
THE CONDITION OF DEATH
for it represents the most extreme point of reference,
no longer threatened by any conformity,
FOR THE CONDITION OF THE ARTIST AND ART
. . this specific relationship

terrifying
but at the same time compelling
the relationship of the living to the dead
who not long ago, while still alive, gave not the slightest
reason for the unforeseen spectacle
for creating unnecessary separation and confusion;

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
they did not distinguish themselves

did not place themselves above others
and as a result of this seemingly banal
but, as would later become evident, rather essential
and valuable attribute
they were simply, normally
in no way transgressing universal laws
unremarkable
and now suddenly
on the other side
opposite
they astound us
as though we
were seeing them for the first time
set on display
in an ambiguous ceremony:
pointless
and at the same time repudiated,
irrevocably different
i5. Kantor's drawingfor

"::::;An old man with a
i : :; ::: ;i;:~!~i~ - ;;;V bicycle."
I :J:a
:jaIrg^'
m600r1cr<la

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
and infinitely foreign

and more: somehow deprived of all meaning
of no account
without the meanest hope of occupying some position
in our "full" life relationships
which to us alone are accessible, familiar
comprehensible
but for them meaningless.
If we agree that a trait
of living people
is the ease and ability
with which they enter into mutual and manifold
life relationships
only then
with regard to the dead
is there born in us a sudden and startling
realization of the fact that
this basic trait of the living
is brought out and made possible by
their complete
lack of differentiation
by their
indistinguishability
by their universal similarity
mercilessly abolishing all other opposing delusions
common
consistent
all-binding.
Only then do the dead
become (for the living)
noteworthy
for that highest price
achieving
their individuality
distinction
their CHARACTER
glaring
and almost
circus-like.
Translated by Voy T. and Margaret Stelmaszynski, Canadian Theatre Re-

view CTR 16, Fall 1977.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
The Work of Art and the Process
1976
i. Not the Work of Art-the End Product of the Creative Process-but
the P R O C E S S Itself:
The concept of the w o r k o f a r t, of this religious and isolated

arrangement, in which aesthetic and formal values were embedded, has
been fractured.
It is not the purpose of art to produce works or house p r o d u c t s of

one's c r e a t i v i t y. Neither is its duty to "store" those rare and
unique objects it inherits from each epoch.
Art
is foremost
16. Kantor's drawing for

"Bottom."

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
a manifestation and
a spiritual activity of man;
an expression of his highest
mental and spiritual f a c u 1 t i e s.
It should be perceived as an
incessant i m p u 1 s e which stimulates
one's mind and psyche
rather than a symptom.
How ridiculous and obsolete seems to be the convention, in which the

act of creativity, this u n i q u e j o u r n e y of mind
and spirit is merely used to produce an object. How ridiculous and obso-
lete seems to be the convention which hides the object behind rigid inter-
relationships, only to reveal it to the world, present it to the public, ex-
pose it to the ambiguous process of interpretation (which combines
contemplation and admiration with ignorance and contempt), and finally,
simply s e 11 it.
There is something immoral in the fact that this "rare" object becomes a
sign of the creative process and as such will have life on its own, will bring
fame and glory, recognition and, of course, money to the artist.
The act of rejection of

this p r i v i 1 e g e
by the artists
connotes their
non-conformity and
their absolute
dedication to
creativity.
This act of rejection is more difficult than
any other formal or stylistic
revolution.
It is not the w o r k (the end product)

nor its "eternal"
or stone-like image
which is important
but
the p r o c e s s of creation,
which u n b 1 o c k s
mental and spiritual faculties.
This is a significant m o v e m e n t,
whose v i t a 1 i t y and
life
are not used to produce the work
but are meaningful in themselves,
for they infiltrate the total
reality and
change its constituency.
2. The Definition of the Process:
The place of a depreciated (and to a degree condemned) concept of "prod-

uct" (work of art), end result of the creative process, has been taken by the
process itself in its act of creation.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
Writings of Tadeusz Kantor 5 I
In order to avoid
any misunderstandings,
it should be clearly indicated that
by the process in its act of creation I do not mean
the process of creation
of this "product" ("work of art"),
nor its manifestation,
extolling the
process of getting ready
or of revealing the "back-stage" details of
the act of creation.
What I mean by the process in the act of creation is
a particular conduct
which is specified by its inner structure;
which does not end
nor can be ended
with the final touch of a brush.
If such a situation is
impossible
and inconceivable
in life,
or in art,
this "impossible"
could be achieved successfully
on the condition that
the elements of this
"p r o c e s s"
are bereft of any other aim
(of any right to be the means
to effective, pragmatic, and specific ends),
than simply
to be perfectly u s e 1 e s s
and thus d e v o i d of any interest in the action.
3. Manipulations Connected with the Concept of the "Work of Art":
The results of this particular way of thinking, which acquire due signifi-
cance in concrete situations, reveal in full the scope of changes they intro-
duce and the depth of dimensions which can be perceived thanks to them.
Due to the colossal baggage of habitual actions, which might seem to be
an inborn routine or in compliance with natural laws, an attitude of ever-
lasting contestation; of constant control and correction (especially necessary
in such a complex work as a work in theatre is); or simply, highly devel-
oped awareness combined with intuition (in art, they are inseparable) are
indispensable to prevent being sidetracked while following those habitual
actions.
Certain characteristics, procedures, circumstances, and manipulations

were closely connected with or were an inherent part of the discarded
notion of the "work of art." In the past and even today, they seem to
have tight bonds and shape the meaning of the concept of art.
The physical rendering of the "work of art" has always been connected
with the whole spectrum of activities. These activities embrace the act of
creation "o u t o f n o t h i n g" (which was a symptom of extreme

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
I52 Writings of Tadeusz Kantor
I7. Photos 17 through 30

are of Kantors 'journey" to sensitivity, artistic fever, hallucinations, visions, shamanic and magic rit-
his childhood home, Wielo- uals), shaping, composing, and constructing.
pole, Wielopole (1980).
(Photo by Gunther K. Here is yet another explanation of this process:
Kuhnel) creation "out of nothing" meant:
juggling with concocted ele m e n t s
which included formal means, methods of arrangement, and various
"tricks."
Thus this process has been nothing more than

imitatio n,
re-creation
of the model which pre-dated the "work of art

the act of p r o c u r ing illusion,
and its actual r e p r e s e n t a t i o n.
Translated from Kantor's unpublished manuscript "Dzieto i Proces."
The Work of Art and the Process

1976
The process of writing a book, of composing a symphony, or of paint-
ing a picture is perceived as the act of creation, which could be defined as
an exceptional and unique manifestation of the human spirit. Therefore, it
might be puzzling that the perception of this particular act takes place only
when the process actually ceases. This perception is only limited to the
"consumption" of the product which is presented to us in the form of a
book, an orchestral performance, or an exhibited painting.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
The process of creation itself is inaccessible. To be more exact, let me

say that this inspired or spiritual moment, this impenetrable mystery of
an act of creation has been paradoxically eliminated from our perception
of the work. Only a trace, a print-out of this process, in which we at-
tempt in vain to discover a reflection of the Great Explosion, has been
thrown out as a lure.
There was a time when the discovery of this interpretation of the pro-
cess seemed illuminating and novel to me. The Popular Exhibition, 1963,
was a physical manifestation of this discovery. A WORK OF ART, a
concrete product of the act of creation, was perceived by me as suspicious
and too "official." I decided then to emphasize the time and the process
of creation, which was being erased from the awareness of the spectators,
to diminish the value of the work of art. Therefore, I defined the act of
creation in terms of all the elements that reflect this forgotten anxiety-
ridden time. Perhaps those elements were crude, unclean, unrepresenta-
tive, selected at random, and unruly. However, they constituted an origi-
nal, incomparable element of the act of creation. They were like the
remains of decrepit objects which were thrown into the dark corners of a
closet never to come to light again.
It was my idea to perceive creation as an act of excavating the forgot-
ten, dust-laden spheres in the "attic" of our consciousness; in the store-
room of our memory; of raising to nobility the so-called junk-room of our
conscious activities. My own "official works" were yet another reason
(my private reason) why I started to probe deeply into those dark and,
apparently, prohibited corners of the mind.
The creative process, the making of visual artworks, was an atavistic
activity and closely connected with magic ritual. Divorcing myself from
them would mean the loss of power. Maintaining the connection with
them meant staying alive. Those "official" or "ritual" works were a pre-
text for the above-mentioned activities of a "lower rank" which, for me,
acquired the significance of true creativity. I have called this reason a
private reason because it is my weak spot which, however, I would never
relinquish.
I am still making those "official" works. Maybe I am making them to
satisfy my private pleasures and needs or maybe I am making them to
have a pretext for something else. Maybe I am not even treating them
seriously and only perceive them as a decoration, a trap. However, I
make them look significant only to catch (or entrap) all those particles of
our imagination which are spinning in all directions, all those indecisions
and decisions, all those frustrations and euphoric states that constitute the
genuine act of creation. This "illegal" manipulation of my own reality,
which is "official" and "facade-like," fascinates me by its perversion and
mystification even today.
I have spent so much time discussing all these problems, because I want
to make a clear distinction between my individual casus and a trend which
is well-known and whose definition can be found in any encyclopedia
under the entry of "PROCESS-ART." To summarize: First, my experi-
ences which were embedded in the ANTI-EXHIBITION are the act of
contestation directed against the WORK (a painting, for example) being
understood as the final product of artistic activities. My intrinsic attitude
toward the act of mystification turns it (a work) into an atavistic object
(maybe a "domestic altar") and a DECORATION-TRAP. This trap is
set up for all those unexposed activities and manipulations; for all those
chaotically spinning ideas; imagination; and consciousness, which en-

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
I8. Wielopole, Wielopole
K. Kuhnel)
I9. Wielopole, Wielopole

(198o). (Photo by Gunther
K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
twine with the crude life-matter and result in notorious essemblage that is
elegantly called-the act of creation.
Second: the experiences drawn from the Anti-Exhibition had nothing in
common with the basic assumptions regarding the tendency to substitute
the phenomenon of THE WORK OF ART (a product of sublime activi-
ties) for a completely independent structure whose crucial part was the
PROCESS itself. My concept was far more complicated. It embraced a
whole spectrum of activities which occurred suddenly and randomly;
which were not self-sufficient; which suggested an unreachable GOAL, a
possibility of a FULFILLMENT: the PORTENT of the FINAL FORM,
CLIMAX, FINALE, or THE WORK OF ART. The germ of my con-
cept was to reject the idea of a COMPLETE and FINISHED WORK OF
ART, to discard the feeling of satisfaction derived from the DENOUE-
MENT, and to focus on ATTEMPTS and nothing but ATTEMPTS!
Those attempts were often futile, full of mistakes, corrections, changes,
variations, and repetitions.
Those feverish and anxious ATTEMPTS must be recognized as true
creativity. To deprive those ATTEMPTS of their CONSEQUENCES
might be unimaginable, absurd, heretical, or even nihilistic. But we must
deprive them of their consequences! Having done so we will gain a NEW
STRUCTURE; the viewer's imagination will construct the SHAPE and
the CONTENT of this new something which will no longer be called A
WORK OF ART.
Let me say a few words about an actor's creativity, which some fools
perceive as either the art of reproduction or refuse to describe as art at all.
Their arguments were sound for our ancestors, but they lost significance
a long time ago. They were based on the assumption that an actor only
re-creates a part which was created by the playwright. It should be men-
tioned that the idea of the playwright as the body and soul of theatre has
been impugned many a time. I do not intend to join this dispute, but let
me assert that the belief that the playwright is the key person in theatre
has ceased to be the true issue. The author of the text surely is not the
author of the performance. The concept of the autonomous theatre is
always worth remembering, especially in times of crisis and decay. Espe-
cially in these times we should not give it up. My speculations are not
rooted in my desire to diminish the role of the playwright. On the con-
trary, I have always been a proponent of the existence of the text as a
prime example of condensed reality. Probably I was among those few
artists who believed that reality which was artistically procured (for ex-
ample in The Anatomy Lesson based on Rembrandt's painting) could be
treated as ready-made reality-l'objet pret. I frequently made use of it in
the times when happenings were a prevailing trend. The text written by
the author falls into the category of this kind of ready-made reality. A
literary text was separated from the performances of Cricot 2 and was
treated as a semantic entity which, I believe, is in compliance with its
structure and function. But the semantic value of the text should not be a
primary source either of the stage action or acting. The latter is fully
autonomous and should be derived from and shaped by the actor's
creativity.
Translated from "Dzieto y Proces" in Borowska, B., ed. 1984. Wielopole,

Wielopole. Krakow: Wydawnictwo Literackie, pp. 16-18.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
The Situation of an Artist
1977
"The situation" of an artist is unprecedented.

To explain the meaning of this seemingly banal sentence,
I have to write many other statements and phrases.
By no means am I placing it (the situation of an artist)

higher and above those other simple, complex, or hopeless situations
in which any man can find himself.
But the situation of an artist is
incomparable; however, if one insists on drawing parallels
between his and the situations of others he might be forced to
descend to the lowest depths.
The situation of an artist is 1 i m i t e d.
This restriction delineates its importance;
it describes "something" that lures us to the trap, and at the same time,
pushes us aside making this "something" unreachable and
incomprehensible.
Maybe, this limitation, or e n c l o s u r e
is an important criterion of truth.
When I was a child, I used to make c a k e s out of paper.

20. Wielopole, Wielopole The cake was flat. But I did not know that. I used to slice it.
K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
Only much later did I understand that it lacked

(1 a c k e d !) something that would allow me to at least
slice it.
But, by that time, I had ceased to make cakes out of paper and
had irrevocably lost this precious momentum which was full ofjoy,
and which, probably, could be
equated with the s i t u a t i o n
of an artist.
This condition of "something is lacking" is this restriction,

of course, "in the eyes of the world."
One is forced to pay his dues for his
rare gift of p e r c e p t i o n
which escapes b e y o n d the confines of this life.
The situation of an artist is similar to the position of someone

who is pursuing some goal and
feels suddenly that this movement forward or quest
becomes the real meaning of his journey and life in general.
Trying to find an exit (or rather a passage),
he sees
more and more doors being locked around him.
Many of them he must close himself
in order to open some others.
But he must keep moving forward,
even though he realizes that everything leads to n o t h i n g n e s s;
that the true meaning of his journey is
the act of c 1 o s i n g which signifies
s e e c t i n g and
rejecting of this
that attempts obtrusively to fill the emptiness with something.
This something is called r e a 1 i t y which
claims the right to be called an obligatory realness and
exclusive justification . ..
21I. Wielopole, Wielopole

(198o). (Photo by Gunther
K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
Only at the brink of calamity when the sanctioned

fabric of "reality" is being rent,
compromised, and unveiled;
when it uses its own phrases to admit that
"everything has become nothing more than fiction";
when contradictions and
alternatives obliterate each other in an inexplicable way,
does the "situation of an artist"
approach the discovery of its mystery.
But it is too late.
Maybe, no one
can perceive this moment.
Translated fiom Kantor's unpublished manuscript "Situaya artysty." Also in

Borowsaka, B., ed. 1984. Wielopole, Wielopole. Krakow: Wydawnictwo Li-
terackie, p. 7.
New Theatrical S P A C E.
Where F IC T I O N Appears.
I980
The process of extending the sphere of Fiction and Imagination into the
sphere of the reality of our lives was colored by metaphysics which, in
fact, was an inherent part of this process. This process of extension
changed entirely the perception of theatre. The first perception to be
modified was that of the concept of theatrical space, which ought to be
conditioned by the sphere of life.
However, the stage, the auditorium, theatre-thus the traditional and
conventional space which was equipped to "receive" drama or Fiction
(neutral, "abstract," sterile, uncontaminated by life)-cannot possibly be
the plane in which fiction could be elevated, and then reach the plateau of
life. Theatre was thus the least suitable place for this process to take place,
and there arose a need to find a space outside of it-in reality.
DIGRESSION. CORRECTION AND EXPLANATION:
I would like to stop here to explain some things and provide so

tions that may enhance the understanding of my thought.
Both the majority of critics and those others, who have been
by my method, have often oversimplified the nature of my tho
cess and thus have never understood its essentials, which were
for them.
DIGRESSION CONTINUED.
STAGE IL L U S I 0 N AND ITS UR-MATTER:
Theatre is one of the most anomalous of institutions. The actual audito-

rium made of balconies, loges, and stalls-filled with seats-finds its par-

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
22. Wielopole, Wielopole

K. Kuhnel)
allel in a completely different space. This "second" "lurking" space is the

space in which everything that happens is FICTION,
illusion,
artificial,
and produced only to mislead or "cheat" a spectator.
All the devices which are used to achieve this deception are skillfully hid-
den and unperceived by the spectator.
What he sees are only mirages of landscapes, streets, houses, and interiors.
They are mirages because this world, when seen from backstage, is artifi-
cial, cheap, disposable, and of "papier-mache."
Penetrating behind this "magnificent" imitation and "facade" we reach
the "BACK"-a True Stage.
This stage is huge, awe-inspiring, and as if laying in wait. It is ALIEN.

K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
PRIMORDIAL, but as if tamed by those glittering, ornamented balco-

nies, caryatids, loges and seats.
A plain wall extends behind the blue sky. Ropes, cables, lights, lifts, and
iron platforms "operate" above the green crown of trees and behind the
marble walls of the palaces. The whole of this inferno of machinery,
worked by the hands of the theatrical proletariat, moves the wheels of the
stage which creates the thin veil of illusion that is cast upon the audience's
eyes.
DESTRUCTION OF "THE WINTER PALACE" OF

ILLUSION:
It seems to me that this double metaphor c

constructivism at the time of the Revolu
fissures in the glittering surface of illusion.
"BACK"[stage], showed it in full light wit
divorced itself from the "aristocratic" circ
nothing more than weak and empty cons
was positive, at least, as far as social chang

K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
Writings of Tadeusz Kantor 16I
However, such an explanation is neither necessary nor sufficient, as will

soon be shown.
FROM THE OTHER SIDE OF IL L U S ION.

OR THE MARKET SQUARE BOOTH STAGE,
SYMBOLISM:
Before the mansion of illusion was torn to pieces, charm, atmosphere, and
the poetry of the back stage had been noticed.
There is a moment in the theatre when malicious and poisonous charms
operate. It is when the lights go out, and the audience leaves; when the
auditorium is empty and grey mist descends upon the objects on the de-
serted stage; when the magnificent scenery and costumes, which a mo-
ment ago were glittering in the lights of the ramp, are reduced to com-
mon materials; when the gestures and emotions, which were full of life
and passion, have faded. Maybe then we will desire to walk across the
stage to find the remnants of life, which moved us a moment ago, as we
would walk through a cemetery. Was it only fiction? That was why the
symbolists were fascinated by the poetry of poor scenery and costumes
which were made of paper, by the pathos of melancholic Pierrots and
jugglers, who concealed their wrinkles, defeats, and the tragedy of hu-
man existence behind their masks. The stage, the MARKET SQUARE
BOOTH STAGE, this empty world is like life's final burst of energy
before it dissipates into eternity; it is like an illusion. At the doorway of a
poor shack, there stands an old Pierrot who quested for his Colombine in
vain. His make-up is smudged by tears.
RETURN TO THE MARKET SQUARE BOOTH STAGE:

Before this image disappears from our memory and poor Pierrot leaves
forever, I would like to say something that may simply and explicitly
describe my journey towards Theatre.
Even though in different periods and at the different "stages" of my jour-
ney I used to label all the places I had visited (The Zero Theatre, The
Informel, The Impossible Theatre, The Theatre of the Lowest Rank, The
Theatre-Journey, The Theatre of the Dead), this MARKET SQUARE
BOOTH STAGE always existed at the back of my mind. All those other
names have only preserved it from official and academic stultification.
They were like the titles of consecutive chapters which described my
struggle and victory over the forces lurking to trap me throughout my
journey into the unknown and the impossible.
For the last half of the century, the poor Market Square Booth Stage has
been nearly forgotten. It has been suppressed from memory by purist
ideas, constructivist revolutions, surrealist manifestations, metaphysics of
abstraction, happenings, environmental art, the ideas of open or concep-
tual theatre, anti-theatre, big battles, hopes, and illusions as well as de-
feats, disappointments, and pseudoscientific degenerations.
Today, after having fought many battles, I see clearly the journey which I
have accomplished. I understand why I have stubbornly refused to accept
both official and institutional status, in other words, why my theatre and
I have been stubbornly refused any privileges that are bestowed upon us
by the achievement of a certain social position. The only tangible answer
to this is that my theatre has always been recognized as the Market
Square Booth Stage.
The only true Theatre of Emotions.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
CONSTRUCTIVISM ONCE AGAIN, ITS UTOPIA

AND SCHOLASTICISM:
In order to finish this lengthy digression, to get to my own

and what is more important, in order to define clearly my th
sonality which has frequently been simplistically associated
the noble past of constructivism or the inanity of the po
garde, I feel the need to elaborate on the great reform of the
constructivists, who perceived a social revolution paralleling
believed that art and its formal means would infiltrate life to such a de-
gree that the two would become one; that, in the near future, art as such
would disappear and would be identified with the perfect arrangement of
life.
THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THE DEMARCATION LINE

BETWEEN THE STAGE AND THE AUDITORIUM:
This concept of the material infiltration of art into life caus

which had separated them, to be eliminated.
Art ceased to be a reflection of life and its illusion.
In its relationship with life, art functioned as a project, a proposal, a
manifesto, and an analogous structure. It did not require contemplation
but cognizance. In theatre, the barrier was created by both a ramp and a
curtain. When these were abolished, the shouts and screams that were
heard evoked the image of the destruction of the Bastille.
The ILLUSION of the stage was torn to pieces. So was the belief in its
magnificence and power. The crude BACK[stage] and its mechanism
were brought to the fore. The walls of Elsinore crumbled to pieces on
stage. In their stead, "working" constructions, platforms, ladders, and
ropes were raised enthusiastically.
ILLUSION was replaced by less radical forms, by "light" information,
and by an autonomous image of cubist forms. In the jargon of theatre
historians this process of change was called the disappearance of the demarca-
tion line between the stage and the auditorium. This "disappearance" was de-
manded by the revolution which, on the one hand, foresaw the necessity
of activating the passive audience and on the other hand, the necessity and
the possibility of immediate contact between the actors and the audience.
There was a need to destroy the distance that separated the auditorium
and the stage. That was done. Thus illusion, which required this distance
and which was based on the existence of this demarcation line, had to
disappear.
It was replaced by an arrangement, which I would call "installations,"
that is a construct with the aim of transmitting a text, a plot, and an
actor's performance.
WHEN THE CURTAIN NEITHER GOES UP NOR FALLS

DOWN, OR THE DIFFICULTIES WITH ILLUSION AND
FICTION:
Total illusion and fiction existed in the naturalistic set up. A

could remain a witness to the events on stage, because he was
everything happening on it within the frames of the box stag
fiction. His role was limited to that of spectator and witness.
This passive reception of the naturalistic illusion on stage coul
full satisfaction.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
There arose the need for a more active perception of the work on stage
and of a work of art in general.
It was apparent that the work itself had to be modified in the process of
activating the senses. Its structure and function had to be changed. The
work ceased to be a reflection of life which connoted a safe perception and
a comfortable condition for the spectator. It became a challenge, a provo-
cation, an indictment, which demanded that the spectator express opin-
ions and answer the questions that were posed. The work was directed at
him. The spectator could not remain passive.
Illusion, which used to stand between these events and the audience, had
to disappear.
Therefore, the distance established by the ramp and the proscenium,
which like a moat in the zoo guarded spectators from the attacks of wild
animals, was demolished.
The acting space was detached from an illusory horizon and pushed for-
ward toward the audience.
Having done so, there was no place for deceptive scenery and palaces. A
stage floor, bridges, stairs, and platforms were enough. Acting, which
was limited by the fourth wall in the past, was open to the audience.
On the one hand, the purpose of this revolution in theatre was to make
the audience participate actively in what was happening on stage and in
the performance. To be more precise, the aim was to make them partici-
pate actively in fiction and illusion. On the other hand, its purpose was to
diminish the border between fiction and life, to create the illusion (sic!)
that we were observing life activities.
The former goal was achieved by the rejection of all the devices which
were used by illusion; by mixing up the place of stage action with this
reserved for the spectators; by placing the actors among the audience and
the audience among the actors. In the hospital, the audience sat on the
beds of the patients; in the prison, they shared the cell with the inmates;
in street fights, they were so close to the fighting that it should have been
required of them to participate . . . But, of course, that never happened.
In yet other settings, the audience was placed among the furniture in the
living room. However, the living room was not a real one, but a repre-
sentation of a living room whose description could be found in drama,
and thus in the sphere of fiction. Therefore, a spectator was only a specta-
tor and perceived as such he was placed there illegally, falsely, or even
untactfully.
The placement of the spectator and the actor at the same "level," giving
them (more or less) equal rights, the hope that thefiction of drama and of
acting would lose their undesirable characteristics and get closer to truth
and reality, were a result of the naive new faith of the constructivist revo-
lution, which firmly believed in the possibility of creating a magnificent
world in which the perfect integration of life and art could take place.
Later (that is nowadays) the same concepts, when enunciated by our
"false" avant-garde, which is bereft of knowledge and scruples, sound flat
and stupid.
The latter goal, whose purpose was to get rid of illusion, was even more
difficult to achieve. A lot has been done to reduce the power of Fiction, to
bring it closer to life, and to make it a part of life reality. The stage action
was placed not in the theatre but in an authentic place which was analo-
gous to that of the play. Kaiser's Gas was played in a refinery. But this
radical solution was nothing more than a naive and false attempt. Even
though the Fiction of drama was transferred to the plane of reality, it did
not cease to exist. Moreover, this exact tautology, this parallel existence

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
of the text of the place and the real space was often a naturalistic device
which could easily have been used by Stanislavski. The Fiction of the
drama was still treated in a conventional way-it was performed! The place
was forgotten . . . after a few brief moments. One could assert that the
spectator was placed in the center of the action. But it might as well have
been said that the degree of illusion was multiplied. The spectator was
placed in a center which was full of illusion and, of course, of fiction. But
this multiplication of illusion was only discovered after the spectator had
left the theatre-or, I should say, a refinery-when illusion dissolved.
All these devices, methods, and struggles, which were undertaken during
that heroic time of the revolution and avant-garde in art, had their un-
questionable rights and a colossal power of convincing anyone by their
radical character. Therefore, it should not come as a surprise that they
helped mold my imagination when I was young. Only later, during the
war, did I discover the numerous inconsistencies and shortcomings of this
approach.
That was when I made my own discovery.
THE CRITIQUE OF CONSTRUCTIVISM AND MY OWN

SETTLING OF ACCOUNTS WITH ILLUSION AND
FICTION:
Now, having reached the end of this long digression, I am

(with satisfaction) to my final Odysseus-like adventures, to the
of my theatrical endeavors, and my concept of theatre.

K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
All the above mentioned battles between constructivism and illusion and
fiction, all the attempts to destroy the latter were only formal.
This was because the meaning of the concept, which stood in opposition
to reality, had not been precisely defined.
REALITY "IS." It is IN LIFE, IN THE REALITY OF OUR LIVES.
ILLUSION and FICTION (of drama and of acting) have not been de-
stroyed because they were not set against the true REALITY.
FICTION has not come in contact with REALITY; it has found its ex-
tension in REALITY.
There was no REALNESS. There was only a place, THEATRE, which,
like a sanctuary, was separated from life and was dedicated to aesthetic
experiences.
Therefore, the spectator still found himself in the space which was re-
served for theatre, in the institution whose job was to smuggle in and
manipulate fiction.
The spectator was coaxed into believing that he experienced fiction as if
he were experiencing "reality of life."
ILLUSION AND CONCRETE REALITY:
Drama is reality. All that happens in drama is real and true.

The moment drama is presented on stage, THEATRE uses all its means
in order to establish the illusion of this true reality. It is achieved by the
use of a curtain, a backstage, stage design of all kinds-"topographical,"
"geographical," "historical," symbolic, explanations which, however,
can only be a mere reflection of the original-and costumes (bring to life
all types of heroes). All those elements make the audience perceive theatre
as a spectacle which should be looked at rather than evaluated in terms of
moral values.
Certain amounts of aesthetic or emotional experiences and moral reflec-

tions are perceived. However, they are perceived from the comfortable
position of an objective spectator who can always show his lack of inter-
est if he is challenged.
A theatre piece should not be "looked at!"
One should take a full responsibility for his entrance into the theatre. One
must not leave unexpectedly. One must experience all that awaits him
there.
Theatre should not create the illusion of reality which is contained in the
drama. This reality of drama must become the reality on stage. The stage
"matter" (that is the stage, its fascinating atmosphere not yet spoiled by
the illusion of drama and the actor's readiness to perform any part) must
not be stifled nor covered up with illusion. It must stay crude and raw. It
must be ready to face and clash with a new reality, that of the drama.
The creation of reality, which is as concrete as the auditorium, rather than
the creation of illusion, which makes the audience feel safe, should be the
ultimate goal on stage.
The drama on stage must be "created" rather than "take place." It must
develop in front of the audience. The drama is being created.
The plot development should be spontaneous and unpredictable.
A spectator must not feel the presence of the machinery which has always
been a part of the theatre.
Therefore, one should avoid situations which might bring back this feel-
ing, but one should add the situation that might expose a spontaneous
growth of drama.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
This act of drama "being created" cannot be hidden in the wings. One
must not allow for drama to sneak into the domain of the stage manager
or the backstage machinery.
The reality of the auditorium is included in the process of the develop-
ment and vice versa.
Before you create a new stage, you must create a new audience. The
performance should be the act by which the new audience is brought into
being.
Translated from Kantor's unpublished manuscript "Nowe miejsce teatralne. Tam

golzie zjawia siefikcja."
The Infamous Transition

from the World of the Dead
into the World of the Living.
Fiction and Reality.
1980
When I was working on the production of Stanislaw Wyspianski's play

The Return of Odysseus at the Underground Theatre in 1944, I jotted
down the following short sentence in my director's book: "Odysseus
must really return . . ." Ever since that day, I have remained faithful to
the meaning of this sentence. It signified the need to find a transition from
the world of "beyond" to the world "here"; from the condition of being
dead into that of being alive. That was the outcome of my long medita-
tions and difficult decisions; meditations on the concept of the theatre-
my theatre. This idea of the transition could have been a tangible solution
in a mystical system. However, in the theatre, [in order to achieve this
transition], one had to take into account the need to use completely un-
conventional and unusual devices.
One had to discover the method. It was not merely the war and Troy
that Odysseus returned from. More importantly, he returned from "out
of the grave," from the realm of the dead, from the "other world" into
the sphere of life, into the realm of the living; he appeared among us. The
return of Odysseus established a precedent and a prototype for all the later
characters of my theatre. There were many of them. The whole proces-
sion that paraded through many productions and dramas came from the
realm of FICTION. All were "dead," all were returning into the world
of the living, into our world, into the present. This contradiction be-
tween death and life perfectly corresponded to the opposition between fic-
tion and reality. From this moment on, one had to be consistent and draw
radical conclusions about acting; one had to resist the temptation of psy-
chological, questionable, and well-known methods of demonstrating
mystical states and situations from the verge of "this" and "that" world.
If the system of death (eternity) is absolute and pure, the sphere of
life-reality-is of a lower rank. The matter of life is seriously "contami-
nated." This "contamination" is largely responsible for the creation of art

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
and theatre. A "dead" character (from a drama), who is ennobled by the

fact that he is dead and placed as if in a "mausoleum of eternity," finds his
"double" ... a living double. But the fact that he is alive is very suspi-
cious. The character is brutally reduced to a common, indeterminate,
"low" personage, a poor imitation through which we can only discern
traces of the greatness possessed by the "prototype" and eternity as well.
A dead greatness can only be perceived through live reality which is com-
monplace and of the lower rank. Death can only be perceived through the
misery of everyday routine; fiction (of drama) through a real place of the
lowest rank.
THE ESSENTIAL MEANING OF THEATRE:
Reincarnation is an extreme and ultimate concept which exists at the

borders of human reasoning. It is a concept which was born out of hu-
man faith, rebellion, and the myth of immortality; out of a primordial
sense of the union with the transcendental sphere. It was conceived in the
deepest stratum of our existence. It is an echo of "lost paradise"; of an
absolute and perfect balance that is unattainable for our culture and men-
tality which have gone through the inferno of the sceptical and critical
mind several times over. What we are left with is the state of nostalgia
and a sense of failure. They can be found at the roots of ancient tragedy
(the concept of irreversibility of human fate) and the intellectual pessi-
mism of our epoch. These states, I am convinced, are also our only chance
and reason for genuine creativity.
I would state further that theatre is the place that reveals-like somefords in
a river do-the traces of "transition" '"fom that other side" into our life. An
ACTOR, who assumes the condition of A DEAD MAN, stands in front
of the audience. A performance, whose form is closely connected with
that of a ritual or a ceremony, could be equated with a treatment which
makes use of a shock. I would gladly call it a metaphysical one.
K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
LIFE-REALITY OF THE LOWEST RANK:
Warning: let us beware and not place our trust easily i

who, misusing those metaphysical reasons, offer us gloo
pathos or the pretentious and empty gestures of shamans.
tightrope dance, irony, sarcasm, and a sense of humor are
of metaphysics. They are also a manifestation of human in
is a positive part of our inheritance from the age of REA
One more thing which is seldom taken into consideration
art), whose highest goal is to affirm life in the world know
side," are OPPOSED to life, as well as to the status and code of life.
They are ANTITHETICAL to life and that is why they are scandalous and
shocking when defined in terms of its categories. This is the reason why
my "Zero" Theatre (I963) (see this issue of TDR, pp. I25 to 134) was a
theatre of phenomena and states which exist "below zero," and were di-
rected toward emptiness, indistinctness, and "low" values. This was the
reason why I proclaimed the realness of the lowest MATERIALISTIC
regions and, horrors!, of moral regions. This was the reason why, in
theatre, I substituted the archaic, pathetic, and "divine" concept of reincar-
nation for the human act of imposture, which admitted to the stage swin-
dlers and crooks; for sneaking in which reflected the obscure methods of
"impure forces"; for transformation which denoted a psychological process
that was colored by mysticism. However, I always felt a mysterious
tremor and awe-inspiring sensation of "the other world" in all those real
processes of the lower rank. ... I felt this tremor while waiting at the
station for Odysseus' return from Troy.
THE ITHACA OF 1944:
. . .The room was destroyed. There was war and there were t
of such rooms. They all looked alike: bare bricks stared from
coat of paint, plaster was hanging from the ceiling, boards we
in the floor, abandoned parcels were covered with dust (they
used as the seating), debris was scattered around; plain boards r
of the deck of a sailing ship were discarded at the horizon of thi
decor; a gun barrel was resting on a heap of iron scrap; a mili
speaker was hanging from a rusty metal rope. The bent figur
meted soldier wearing a faded overcoat stood against the wal
day, June 6, 1944 [D-Day], he became a part of this room. He c
and sat down to rest. Despite his poor condition, he carried a
air. When everything returned to normal after the intrusion fro
side, when the date was established, and when all the element
room seemed to become indispensable elements of this compos
soldier turned his head to the audience and said this one sentence: "I am
Odysseus, I have returned from Troy." This everyday REALNESS,
which was firmly rooted in both place and time, immediately permitted
the audience to perceive this mysterious current flowing from the depth
of time when the soldier, whose presence could not have been ques-
tioned, called himself by the name of the man who had died centuries
ago. A split second was needed to see this return, but the emotion raised
by it stayed much longer ... in memory!

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
REALITY-MEDIUM. THE MAGIC OF REALITY:
... The FICTION of drama was the sphere of death ... the dead
characters . . . the past for me. Realness, into which this FICTION en-
tered, had to be extremely prosaic, mundane, and of the low rank. It had
to be a part of our times and our lives. This particular use of a "stage
device" had nothing to do with the avant-garde trend of the twenties to
dissolve the borders between fiction and life and to turn the spectators into
the witnesses of a true event.
My attitude toward the realness of life was not particularly specified.
Neither did I maintain that this realness should have been consolidated. It
was only an extremely important and necessary condition and medium of
"rendering" fiction or the world of the dead. In our perception we have
two images imposed on each other-one coming from our reality and the
other one from the world "beyond." This process of achieving a total
picture was almost a mysterious ritual which was celebrated as if it were
illegally in a secret place or in deep corners of our consciousness; on a
deserted plane of life or an eerie cemetery where the living build houses
for the dead.
On the other hand, this method had nothing in common with the
"mystery" of surrealism. I did not find it necessary to consolidate (this is
the term which I use to refer to the process of blocking a production)
strangeness, pure elements of the absurd, illogical associations which can
be found in art. These elements, called "mystery" in literature, turned
into bizarre elements once transferred onto the stage. The plays of Wit-
kiewicz as staged in the professional theatre could serve as a prime exam-
ple here. No one has realized, or maybe no one has understood, that this
"surrealistic" mystery which is contained in the literary structure of the
plays cannot textually be transferred into another structure, theatrical or
otherwise. Moreover, the time of heroic battles of surrealism has long
passed away and faded from memory. This mystery must be found
somewhere else.
THE REALITY OF THE SPACE:
The fiction of drama becomes "reality" through a space's characteristics

and action. During the performance, the actors do not show a fictitious
action of the drama nor its fictitious characters (what could be perceived
as their natural function) but perform activities and behave in a way im-
posed upon them by the reality of the space and its characteristics.
A launderette was once such a space. However, washers, washtubs, hot
water, steam, hanging laundry, the act of washing and hanging, etc.,
acquired a new significance and meaning while going through various
stages of euphoria, excitement, and unruliness.
Thus, this nearly naturalistic reality suddenly gained new, somewhat
suspect characteristics. It swelled and began to "speak" in a foreign
tongue as if it were "possessed." It identified itself with something that is
alien or dead to us. This process of change is the "slipping" of the Fiction
of drama-which I labeled the world of the dead-into reality. Of course,
the space cannot be a background only; it ought to be closely connected
with its activities, situations, actions, characters, with its psychological
and emotional states . ..

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
THE DEFINITION OF THEATRE ONCE AGAIN:
Theatre is an activity that occurs if life is pushed to it

where all categories and concepts lose their meaning and r
where madness, fever, hysteria, and hallucinations are the
of life before the approaching TROOPS OF DEATH
GRAND THEATRE. This is my definition of theatre, whi
and mystical. But this is the only way one can think and t
atre. This is why my theatrical activities cannot be classifie
any rational or pragmatic categories that used to describe
demic exercises in theatre activities. True theatre activity is
creation which is deeply rooted in the "world beyond."
Translated fiom "Niestawne przejscie ze swiata umartych w S

Fikcja i realnosc" in Borowska, B., ed. 1984. Wielopole, Wiel
Wydawnictwo Literackie, pp. 125-128.
The Room. Maybe a New P

1980
After many speculations and transformations, the ROOM in Wielopole,

Wielopole acquired a final form which neither corresponded to a meticu-
lously described concept of the Real Space nor to that of the Bio-object.
The concept of the Bio-object has become too physical and too much of a
burden. What I aimed to achieve in this new production was a further
development of the idea of recollection and memory which first surfaced in
The Dead Class.
The following are the notes I took during the rehearsals of Wielopole,
Wielopole. They describe content rather than physical space, since the
space was simultaneously the content and the thought of this spectacle.
It is difficult to define spatial dimension of memory.

Here, this is a room of my childhood
with all its inhabitants.
This is the room which I keep reconstructing over and over again
and which is destroyed over and over again.
Its inhabitants are the members of my family.
They continuously repeat all their movements and activities
as if they were recorded on a film which is shown interminably.
They will keep repeating those banal,
elementary, and aimless activities
with the same expression on their faces;
with the concentration on the same gesture
until boredom strikes.
Those trivial activities,
which stubbornly and oppressively preoccupy us,
fill up our lives . . .
These DEAD FACADES
come to life, become real and important

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
K. Kuhnel)
through this stubborn REPETITION OF ACTION.

Maybe this stubborn repetition of action,
this pulsating rhythm
which lasts for life;
which ends in nothingness;
which is futile;
is an inherent part of MEMORY ...
There is also a place "BEHIND THE DOOR,"
a place which is somewhere at the back of the ROOM;
a DIFFERENT space;
-an open interior of our imagination-
which exists in a different dimension.
This is where the threats of our memory are woven;
where our freedom is born . . .
We are standing at the door giving a long farewell to our childhood;
we are standing helpless
at the threshold of eternity and death.
In front of us,
in this poor and dusky room,
behind the door,
a storm and an inferno rage,
and the waters of the flood rise.
The weak walls of our ROOM,
of our everyday or
linear time,
will not save us ...
Important events stand behind the door;
it is enough to open it ...
THE ROOM cannot be a real space. It cannot be a r e a 1 r o o m. If we

take the audience into consideration, the room could not possibly be per-
ceived as an intimate room of childhood but rather as a public forum.
There is also another reason: the room cannot be real, i.e., exist in our
time, because this room is in our MEMORY, in our RECOLLECTION

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
OF THE PAST. This is the room which we keep constructing over and
over again and which is destroyed over and over again. This pulsating
rhythm must be maintained, because it delineates the real structure of our
memory. At the same time the ROOM cannot be "furnished"; cannot be
the place beyond which the seating begins; cannot be the stage. If it were,
the room would be nothing more than a scene design, which would irre-
vocably crush our hopes for achieving r e a 1 n e s s.
All those speculations force us to abandon logical analysis and rational

thinking. Probably we will have to expand the meaning of r e a 1 n e s s
onto the plane of immaterial MEMORY. We will have to accept
m e m o r y as the only r e aln e s s. This means that we will have to
build a rational model of m e m o r y and define its sphere of activities
as well as means of expression. This means that we will have to transfer
the concept of r e a 1 n e s s onto the platform of EVENTS, ACTION,
and ACTING ...
This process is explained in Wielopole, Wielopole by the fact that

tacle lacks the element of FICTION (drama), which would call f
procreate illusion. Therefore, r e a 1 n e s s is the only elem
ought to exist. And this is it! EVENTS, ACTION-on stage-
n e w r e a 1 n e s s! Recollections of the past, functioning of
are real, because they are . . . f u t i 1 e!
Postscriptum:
Wielopole, Wielopole has just seen the light. Maybe, many of i
and mysteries will be explained in the near future.
Translated from "Pok6j. Bye moze nowy etap!" in Borowska, B.,

28. Wielopole, Wielopole Wielopole, Wielopole. Krakow: Wydawnictwo Literackie, pp. 139
K. Kuhnel)

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
Prison
1985
Prison.
It is both a concept
and it's perfect,
meticulously and thoughtfully structured realization in the history of
mankind. It is undeniably a "product" of man and civilization.
The fact that "prison" is set up against man; that it is a brutal mechanism
established to crush man's free thoughts happens to be one of the grim-
mest absurdities. However, similar absurdities can be found in abundance
in history,
the illustrious "magistra vitae."
Let us leave then for history
the meting out ofjustice
and the verdict of guilt.
Let us consider
the ontological aspect of prison and its ...
eschatology.
Prison ...
A word which sticks in the throat . . .
There is something final about it; a feeling that something has happened
that cannot be undone or revoked . .. The gates of prison close behind a
man, as the gates of an open grave close over the dead who "walk"
through them . . . In a moment the grave-diggers will be through with
their work. The living are standing yet for a long while . . . as if they
could not accept the idea that he is to be left
"there"
alone!
Inconceivably alone ...
They are standing
helpless and powerless
at the verge of
something that
they can neither touch nor name . . .
The man who is already "on the other side" is setting off on his journey.
He is going to travel
alone, left to himself,
destitute
with nobody but himself to rely on.
He walks aimlessly and hopelessly
along a deserted and frightening path . . .
Nothing but marching on . . .
from the height of
-I daresay-
imagination's wild flights and sure madness
I saw this apparition
in front of my eyes
in a ghostly landscape of horror.
[This apparition] was like an idea, which against all reason and all logic,
cruelly and absurdly, like a taunting grin, hovers at the doorway of my
new
THEATRE.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
Once again I see

this apparition,
outlawed and
tainted with madness;
which is able to
convey
by means of violence and change,
like a cry of despair,
the most dramatic manifestation of
ART and FREEDOM!
. .. Prison...
is an idea
separated from life by an ALIEN impenetrable
barrier.
It is so separate [from the world of the living] that
if this blasphemous likeness is permitted-it will be able to shape,
somewhere in the distance,
THE WORK OF ART ...
. . .The metaphoric use of this obscure image
for the creative process may be
revolting or immoral.
So much the better!
This would surely mean
that we are on the right track!
Translated by Grazyna Branny for Kantor's program booklet sold at perfor-

mances of Let the Artists Die. Edited by Michal Kobialka.
Reflection
1985
Against the background of the dark and dirty Earth, I saw a bright spot
the size of a saucer.
It was shining too brightly to be a part of that earthly matter out of
which everything else has been created.
When I raised my eyes above the rooftops, I saw the sky, which was
shining as brightly as the spot, and which did not belong to this Earth
either.
The "something" that was shining was the sky reflected in a piece of a
broken mirror.
Reflection.
A phenomenon abused by art which defies naturalism.
A man who, for the first time, saw his reflection in the still waters must
have experienced an illumination. Against the advice of surrealists one
must not step into, God forbid, must not walk through the surface of the
mirror.
Remain in front of it.
The reflection itself is a wonder. A mystery of the universe is enclosed in
it. [This reflection shows] reality which is as if split into two, moved

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC

K. Kuhnel)
away from itself, caught and locked away

as if in a prison
or as if lowered into the grave and thus no longer belonging to this
world. The impossibility of bringing life and death together is fulfilled.
Of course, this can only happen in the world of illusion and at play. The
feeling of touching eternity while still being alive.
I want to restore to the word reflection its essential meaning and implica-
tions which are tragic, dangerous, and much deeper than those which we
were taught to believe in by the false con-missionaries of the truth-to-
nature dogma. Neither copying nor recreating is the issue here.
Something far more important is. The extension of our reality beyond its
boundaries so that we can better cope with it in our lives.
An extension which will give us an intimation of another world in the

metaphysical and cosmic sense, the feeling of touching other realities.
Let us call it art,
or even better,
Poetry, which I perceive as a daring expedition into the unknown
and the impossible.
Do not identify poetry
with fiction,
illusion or
deception.
Poetry is an extension of reality;

its roots are in reality which is mundane,
banal,
grey,
and despised by mediocre poets.
Despised.
I want to define this process which eludes all conventions and norms, and
is practically banned.
But first, one poetic condition must be fulfilled:

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC
K. Kuhnel)
the reflection of reality is its extension which is as real and substantial as

the reality. Anyway, maybe everything is but a reflection . . .
I am walking from the depths of infinity which I have left behind. I am
walking forward. There is a mirror in front of me; the invisible boundary
of the mirror which marks the beginning of an extension of reality and
the time of poetry. From this moment on let us repeat the warning: ev-
erything is reality, illusion does not exist. Maybe it will be easier for us to
enter the world of poetry. I am walking forward. Someone, who is an-
other I, is walking up to me. In a moment we will pass each other or
bump into each other. I am thinking about this moment with growing
uneasiness. However, it does not escape my perception that I am not
walking forward but in the direction of the depth where I started a mo-
ment ago. I am walking forward back.
And then I realize that the other person, the I-Over-There, is not walking
forward but in the direction of the depth which I left behind me. I lift my
hat with my right hand.
The raised hat is on the right-hand side of my body. He, the other I,
makes the same motion. Even though he does it on the same side of the
body, he uses his left hand. I tell him to use his right hand as I did, he
obeys, but then his raised hat is
ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE of my body

and of my hat.
I have noticed that this correction of reversibility gives the right impres-
sion of
REFLECTION on stage in real space . . .

If we make a step further on this road, it might happen that a smile will
turn into a grimace; virtue, a crime; and a whore will become a virgin.
Due to those mysterious laws of reversibility, the imperative of con-
temptible death in the title [Let the Artists Die] refers to the artists. Fame
and glory touch down the hell of the bottomless social pit;
the world of bums, pimps, artists, whores.
Art, the noblest of man's ideals, turns into a despicable chamber of
torture,
out of which the artist's appeal to the world is tapped in a prison code.
Translated from an unpublished manuscript. Another translation was published in

Kantor's program booklet sold at performances of Let the Artists Die.

132.174.250.89 on Sat, 23 Jan 2021 16:43:32 UTC

Tadeusz Kantor - Writings

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tadeusz Kantor - Writings

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Tadeusz Kantor - Writings

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Writings of Tadeusz Kantor 1956-1985

Author(s): Michal Kobialka

Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1145754

This content downloaded from

Translated by Michal Kobialka

Trans. Note: One of the most fascinating elements in Tadeusz Kantor's

This content downloaded from

*The 1956 production of The Cuttlefish implemented this

This content downloaded from

or find its new meanings.

I consider such interpretations

This content downloaded from

1. Photos 1 through 12 are

2. The stage description:

This content downloaded from

whose utilitarian character

This content downloaded from

This realization of the "impossible" From the "impossible" to

This content downloaded from

This content downloaded from

The concept of the Zero Theatre

This content downloaded from

(1975). (Photo by Gunther Reaching zero,

This content downloaded from

Translated from Teatr Autonomiczny. 1963. Krakow: Galeria Krzysztofory.

The Informel Theatre

After a long period of experiments on the new method of the i n fo r m e 1

[The Informel Theatre] is a discovery of an unknown aspect of REALITY

Creating a method out of those speculations and applying it in theatre

This relentless elimination of the undesirable influences has been achieved

This content downloaded from

tions; by leaving them without providing final answers and resolutions,

A facade has unexpectedly become for me the outerform of reality in art.

Normal emotional states change imperceptibly into shreds of emotions

Translated from "Teatr Informel" in Borowski, W. 1982. Tadeusz Kantor.

This content downloaded from

The traditional techniques of plot development made use of human life as

4. The Dead Class

This content downloaded from

empty (according to standard opinions) existence.

This content downloaded from

2. Notes on the "Zero" Theatre:

This content downloaded from

This system of expansion, its values and flaws, is well kno

5. The Dead Class i

This content downloaded from

all this baggage of old meaning and depth,

This wish could be fulfilled by an actor who rejects illusion as a point of

This content downloaded from

On the one hand, there is the reality of the text,

Actors become deeply

This content downloaded from

And then submerge in the feeling of

Counteract "open" acting,

6. The Dead Class

This content downloaded from

with acting "on the sly."

"Expressive" states appear

This content downloaded from