Lesson 1 - Development of Atomic Structure
Lesson 1 - Development of Atomic Structure
TOPIC DISCUSSION
• Atoms make up most of the things in the universe; where there are no atoms, there is
a void.
• Atoms are incredibly small and cannot be divided, hence a tomos (not to be cut).
• Atoms themselves are solid, homogeneous and cannot change.
• Atoms moving about and colliding in the void cause the changes we see in our
universe.
• The shapes, sizes and weights of individual atoms influence the characteristics of the
thing they make up, that is, sharp atoms cause our tongues to tear and make bitter or
sour tastes.
Plato expanded Empédocles theory by saying each of the four kinds of matter is
composed of geometrical solids (the “Platonic
solids”) further divisible into triangles. When
rearranged, these triangles could cause the
apparent transformations between the four
basic kinds of matter. Cube represents Earth,
Tetrahedron for Fire, Air is represented by
Octahedron, water is represented by
icosahedron, and the universe is embodied by
dodecahedron.
Hot is the product of Air and Fire, Dry is produced by the combination of fire and
earth; combination of earth and water produces cold; and finally, when water is combined
with air, it produces wet. The obsession with Aristotle’s ideas (and his arguments against
atomists) that prevented atomism from gaining ground.
The ideas of these Greek philosophers attracted several persons. Later, medieval folks
were also charmed by these ideas. Even though these philosophers were not Christian, their
writing and such were copied by Christian monks and have survived while so many books of
their contemporaries have not. As years went back and the Roman Empire collapsed into dark
Middle Ages, these ideas all but disappeared into the cellars of monasteries and libraries of
Eastern scholars, if they survived at all.
The rediscovery of classical texts by Aristotle and others started the renewed interest
in philosophy, art, and the natural and social sciences. Starting in 14th century Florence, the
Renaissance quickly spread out to the rest of Europe, paving the way for the early modern
time
Lavoisier was able to refute Aristotle’s thinking of a universe composed of three or four
kinds of matter. He had proof of Boyle’s concept of a simple substance, now known as the
chemical element. He argued that a chemical element is a substance that cannot be broken
down into simpler components. He defined a compound as a substance composed of these
elements. He came up with an initial list of 33 elements and created a systematic way of
naming elements and the compounds they created. He also wrote the first Chemistry
textbook. For this and many other contributions, he became known as the Father of Chemistry.
Dalton proposed his atomic theory as the best explanation to three important
observations made at the time. These three observations were replicable results of
experiments done by different scientists. Since we have enough evidence to establish these
observations as consistently occurring under certain conditions of nature, they are now
known as laws. There are the 3 Fundamental Laws: (1) Antoine Lavoisier’s Law of
Conservation of Mass, (2) Joseph Proust’s Law of Definite Proportions, and (3) John Dalton’s
Law of Multiple Proportions.
In 1911, Rutherford theorized that the model proposed by Thomson did not explain
the deflection of alpha particles. Therefore, he devised his own model with a positive nucleus
at the center and electrons revolving like planets at a distance around it. The incredibly dense
nucleus explained the occasional deflection experienced by the alpha particles, while the
amounts of empty space in between explained why most particles were able to pass through.
Rutherford envisioned the atom as like a miniature solar system, with electrons orbiting
around a massive nucleus, and as mostly empty space, with the nucleus occupying only a
very small part of the atom.
Rutherford later concluded that the nucleus was composed of positive particles known
as protons, which were then thought to be hydrogen nuclei found in other atoms. He
suggested the possibility of finding a composite particle (proton + electron) with a negligible
electric field that composed the nucleus.
However, the Bohr model of the atom was still unable to explain why atoms bonded
in certain ways to form compounds. For example, carbon formed compounds of CH4 while
oxygen formed H2O.
• Instead of electrons being particles in the model, electrons have characteristics of both
waves and particles.
• Instead of orbits, there were orbitals or regions of space with high probability of
finding electrons. These are sometimes known as electron clouds or electron subshells
whose shapes are described by complex wave equations.
• There is no real “empty space,” but there are regions with a high or low probability of
finding an electron.
The quantum model more accurately explains properties of elements such as the way
that atoms bond with one another. However, it made Rutherford’s proposal of composite
proton-electron particles unworkable. This is because the equations would predict that there
was a zero probability of electrons being found in the nucleus.
SCHOOL WORK
REFERENCE
Book:
• Teaching Guide for Senior High School: Physical Science. The Commission on
Higher Education in collaboration with the Philippine Normal University