Gender Inequality and Sexism
Gender Inequality and Sexism
Gender Inequality and Sexism
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Professor’s Name
Date
2
Gender inequality is a common phenomenon in every society. Women and men receive
different treatment, which influences their development in life. In patriarchal societies, men hold
the dominant position of breadwinners, leaders, and decision-makers. On the other hand, women
are a support system for men to achieve their goals. Traditionally, women were an extension of
men's wealth. Boys would grow up knowing that marrying and having children was necessary
for their success. Girls had to conform to a culture of subordination. Division of labor
accentuated this difference where men received brain-tasking and strenuous jobs such as going to
battle, negotiating peace between warring parties, and providing for the family. Women handled
domestic chores that required less mental strain, such as cooking, caring for children and
husbands. This system of thinking has continued into the 21st century despite numerous efforts to
fight gender inequality. The concept of masculinity and femininity has affected both sexes
equally regarding health, education, and access to services. Women are victims of gender-based
violence, restrictive health policies, and poor services. This paper will examine the sociological
causes of gender inequality, social factors contributing to this problem and explore various
phenomena causing the problem. The first perspective is structural functionalism which has
influenced differing treatments for men and women. The theory states that the family is the
integral unit of society and its maintenance requires men and women to perform different tasks
(Lindsey, 2020). Men are breadwinners, and women work domestically as caregivers and
3
homemakers. Breaking this structure would jeopardize the family unit. Consequently, the
perspective contributes to gender inequality since women cannot work outside the scope of the
home.
The second perspective is the conflict theory which postulates that human interaction
consists of a dominance struggle. Men are the dominant group, and women are the subordinates.
The dominant group sets the rules of operation that favor their species and discriminates against
the other section of society. These rules are ways to maintain control over resources. A German
sociologist, Friedrich Engels, states that the conflict theory is similar to the power struggle
between classes. One social class, the bourgeois, has control over resources, and the proletariat
work to finance their activities. The former ensures continuous suppression of the latter to
maintain their power. Once the proletariats gain control of the means of production, then the
bourgeoisie loses control. The same applies to men who must ensure they set laws that
discriminate against women and prevent them from exploring their full potential.
masculinity and femininity. Society associates women with care, emotions, and weakness, while
men relate to strength, ruthlessness, and machoism (Lindsey, 2020). Hence positions such as
nursing, teaching, and domestic services were traditionally dominated by women, whereas
politicians, scientists, and engineers were primarily men. This perspective shows that engrained
in every individual is a symbol that creates meaning and shapes their world view, consequently
promoting gender inequality. For instance, when going to an interview, the presentation that one
displays differ according to the sex of the interviewer. If the interviewer is a man, a person
subconsciously presents a robust and analytical character. In contrast, if it's a woman, the
individual may showcase the emotional aspect of social interactions. Inadvertently, the person
4
has portrayed their perceived concept of female and male, promoting sexism. These ideologies
shape society and the concepts it attaches to things to achieve meaning. For instance, the first
thought that pops into one's mind when they hear domestic violence is the woman being the
victim and the man the perpetrator. This thinking is defective and can allow certain aspects of a
problem to remain unaddressed for years. The final perspective is the feminist theory which
addresses the gender privilege that men have over women. The perspective considers social
stratification and conflict theory in explaining gender inequality (Baligar, 2018). Social
stratification occurs when society ranks people, leading to differences in status and power. In a
patriarchal society, men's views hold a greater dominance than females. Today when a woman
addresses an issue aggressively, society tags her as moody, irrational, and uninformed, whereas
if a man does the same, he is brave, assertive, and confident. Feminism theory incorporates the
recently coined term "intersectionality," which postulates that certain social, biological, and
cultural categories create bigger problems for women. For instance, women of color face a
greater barrier to success than white women because they have to fight racism and social
suppression. Hence, the perspective shows that social stratification causes gender inequality.
positions of power execute policies that favor their needs and enhance the continuity of society
(Shawar & Shiffman, 2020). From the rise of humanity, men have had the upper hand at
everything that entails life. This situation has perpetuated gender inequality and sexism on end.
Once women gain these positions, they will address matters that affect them directly. For
instance, the formation of the Women's Movement in the United States during the wake of
World War I addressed gender equality issues such as voting rights. These women understood
5
that society would bend to their rules once they gained control of the political process. Issues
concerning health and women's autonomy lead back to political power. Voting rights enable
women to elect individuals who will fight for better health and enhance freedom of bodily
autonomy. This freedom includes the availability of contraceptives, family planning, and
The second contributor to gender inequality and sexism is societal mindsets that influence
health, education, and leadership. Cultural barriers contribute to gender inequality significantly.
For instance, Female Genital Mutilation among African, Asian, Arabic, and European
communities contributes to infertility, infections, and hemorrhaging (Singh, 2012). The victims
lack legal protection because the act is embedded in their culture. The third contributor to gender
inequality and sexism entails structural factors. Various social structures contribute to gender
inequality, such as religious, educational, and commercial institutions. Religion has a special
place in influencing individuals' thinking patterns and actions. Most religions emphasize the role
of men as the head of families, providers, and authority in society. They automatically enhance
gender inequality by their teachings. In Islam, women cannot go to pray in the mosque when
they are on their periods. Additionally, they cannot hold positions of Imams or religious leaders.
The same was the Christianity, but change appears to be taking place gradually.
inequality. Numerous countries still practice these beliefs and discriminate against children based
on their sexes. For instance, schools organize teams based on gender, such as football being a
male-dominated sport and cheerleading being a female role (Cooray & Potrafke, 2011). This
concept perpetuates the idea of sexism. Finally, gender inequality at the workplace is quite
evident in the low-pays and discriminatory promotion. Women earn less than men in almost
6
every industry. Various actresses in Hollywood have complained of discriminatory pay while
performing similar tasks as their male counterparts (Khuzwayo, 2016). These institutional factors
Sociologists suggest that political representation is vital to attaining gender equality and
reducing sexism (Kage, Rosenbluth, & Tanaka, 2019). Many of the problems women face
continue because they lack legal protection. Beginning in the 19th century, women took hold of
their problems and decided to fight for equality. They started with voting rights which enabled
them to influence policies that affected society. Once they gained these rights, they proceeded to
seek political representation. It was not enough that women could vote if they lacked their people
on the policy-making floor. Women better understand the problems facing them, and they are
more likely to pass laws that issue protection to their sex. Issues such as women's education
depend on the government's ability to open up schools for every child. These children should
receive equal treatment in schools that allow them to pursue the career paths of their dreams. If a
woman wants to become a politician, no barriers should exist to hinder this dream; they can
break the societal stereotype of low intelligence quotient among women. Additionally, when
more women are in positions of power, they can join hands to pass bills quickly, considering the
need for a quorum when passing laws in parliament. These laws will deal with health rights,
education, equal pay, and protection against FGM and domestic violence. Today, women in the
United States enjoy greater freedom than other nations because they have representation. The
current vice president Kamala Harris has joined the league of numerous powerful women who
have taken the political stage by storm. The contribution of these women will likely end the
The second solution that sociologists suggest is the education of women. Education is a
powerful tool of society since it opens up individuals' minds and qualifies them for various
positions. The purpose of education is to release someone from the shackles of ignorance that
dwells naturally in the minds of human beings; it shines light into the darkness of a person's
cognition and allows them to shape a worldview. Men were the sole beneficiaries of education in
numerous societies. They could study mathematics, physicals, astronomy, and theology, among
other complex fields; this pattern shaped the numerous discoveries that men pioneered.
Furthermore, prominent scholars such as Isaac Newton, Galileo Galilei, and Sigmund
Freud, among others, were men. Women hardly appeared in any history books, having invented
the revolutionary machine or concept that would change humanity. The situation was so because
girls never had an opportunity to learn. Those that did were from wealthy families, and they
ended up studying either poetry or other relatively minor subjects. Boys learned subjects that
empowered them to become the best versions of themselves. This phenomenon enhanced gender
inequality and sexism. Society associated women with low intellect, and they were behind the
hinder development of sex. Furthermore, education helps break the assumptions of the conflict
theory, which describes men as the dominant group. It empowers women to manipulate factors
of production and earn a living independently; they do not have to depend on their male
counterparts for financial needs. Financial independence frees women from manipulating their
husbands and relatives, reducing gender inequality (Walker, Pearce, Boe, & Lawson, 2019).
Conclusion
institutionally, culturally, politically, and economically. From a tender age, children grow up
8
with social symbols that help them create meaning in life. As they progress, they find themselves
in stratified groups that promote discrimination. Girls face various hindrances that limit the
achievement of their goals. They have to fight through these levels of discrimination to achieve
true meaning and purpose in life. Boys trend through life smoothly since society has made it
possible to appear faultless even amidst various wrongs. They receive higher pay and promotions
References
Cooray, A., & Potrafke, N. (2011). Gender inequality in education: Political institutions or
Homan, P. (2019). Structural sexism and health in the United States: A new perspective on
health inequality and the gender system. American Sociological Review, 84(3), 486-516.
Kage, R., Rosenbluth, F. M., & Tanaka, S. (2019). What explains low female political
285-309.
Shawar, Y. R., & Shiffman, J. (2020). Political challenges to prioritizing gender in global health
Singh, B. P. (2012). Sociology of Female Foeticide and Infanticide. Where does the Law Stand?.
Walker, J., Pearce, C., Boe, K., & Lawson, M. (2019). The power of education to fight