2.inception Report (Repaired)
2.inception Report (Repaired)
2.inception Report (Repaired)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER:1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 5
1.1 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................................5
1.2 ABOUT BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION (BRO)................................................................................................6
1.2.1 Vision Of BRO............................................................................................................................................6
1.2.2 Mission Of BRO..........................................................................................................................................6
1.2.3 Role of the BRO.........................................................................................................................................7
1.2.4 Organisation Chart of BRO.......................................................................................................................7
1.3 ABOUT BEACON, BRO.................................................................................................................................7
1.4 PRESENT REPORT..........................................................................................................................................8
1.5 PROJECT MANAGEMENT.................................................................................................................................8
1.5.1 Objective of the Assignment.....................................................................................................................8
1.5.2 Project Management Module...................................................................................................................8
Page | 1
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study
(FS), Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction
services for improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION Chamkot (NH-701) for further development as NHDL specification with
paved shoulder as well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32
BRTF project Beacon in state of Jammu & Kashmir .
3.1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................45
3.2 GENERAL APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING THE SCOPE OF WORK...................................................................45
3.3 COMPOSITION OF TEAM................................................................................................................................45
3.4 MOBILIZATION AND START-UP MEETING........................................................................................................45
3.5 STAGES OF PROJECT.....................................................................................................................................46
3.6 DELIVERABLES OF THE PROJECT....................................................................................................................51
3.6.1 Inception Report and Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) Documents........................................................51
3.6.2 Feasibility Report....................................................................................................................................51
3.6.3 Strip Plan, Clearance land and acquisition:..........................................................................................52
3.6.4 Land Acquisition Report:........................................................................................................................52
3.6.5 Draft Detailed Project Report................................................................................................................52
3.6.6 Final Detailed Project Report, Documents and Drawings....................................................................53
3.6.7 Technical Schedules................................................................................................................................54
3.7 METHODOLOGY FOR DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES DURING DPR.............................................................................54
3.7.1 Reconnaissance Survey...........................................................................................................................54
3.7.2 Draft Design Standards and Procedures...............................................................................................54
3.7.3 Socioeconomic Analysis..........................................................................................................................54
3.7.4 Environmental Examination..................................................................................................................55
3.7.5 Traffic Survey and Analysis....................................................................................................................55
3.7.6 Road Safety Audit...................................................................................................................................57
3.7.7 Topographic Survey................................................................................................................................57
3.7.8 Geotechnical Investigations, Subsoil Exploration and Material Investigations...................................57
3.7.9 Hydraulic and Hydrological Investigation............................................................................................58
3.7.10 Pavement Structural Strength and Investigation.............................................................................58
3.7.11 Inventory & Conditions Survey for Road & Junctions.......................................................................58
3.7.12 Inventory and Condition Survey of Bridges and Cross-drainage Structures...................................58
3.7.13 Preliminary Design of Road and Pavement......................................................................................59
3.7.13 Preliminary Design of Bridges and Cross Drainage Structures.......................................................60
3.7.14 Preliminary Design of intersection layouts.......................................................................................61
3.7.15 Preparation of Strip Plan and Land Acquisition...............................................................................61
3.7.16 Preparation of BOQ and Cost Estimates............................................................................................61
3.7.17 Socio- Economic Profile......................................................................................................................62
5.1 GENERAL.................................................................................................................................................... 68
5.2 DESIGN CODES/ SPECIFICATIONS..................................................................................................................68
5.3 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS.............................................................................................................................69
5.3.1 General....................................................................................................................................................69
5.4 PRELIMINARY DESIGN..................................................................................................................................70
5.5 DETAILED DESIGN........................................................................................................................................71
5.6 HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT.............................................................................................................................71
5.6.1 Horizontal Curves...................................................................................................................................72
5.6.2 Transition Curves....................................................................................................................................72
5.6.3 Sight Distance.........................................................................................................................................73
6.6.4 Design Speed...........................................................................................................................................73
Page | 2
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study
(FS), Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction
services for improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION Chamkot (NH-701) for further development as NHDL specification with
paved shoulder as well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32
BRTF project Beacon in state of Jammu & Kashmir .
6.1 PROFORMA..................................................................................................................................................88
6.1.1 Inventory and Condition for Roads and Structures...............................................................................88
6.1.2 Traffic Survey Formats...........................................................................................................................88
6.1.3 Axle Load Survey.....................................................................................................................................88
6.1.4 Benkelman Beam Deflection Survey......................................................................................................88
6.1.5 Soil and Material Investigations............................................................................................................88
6.1.6 Environmental Impact Assessment and EMP Report............................................................................88
6.1.7 Social Assessment...................................................................................................................................89
Page | 3
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study
(FS), Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction
services for improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION Chamkot (NH-701) for further development as NHDL specification with
paved shoulder as well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32
BRTF project Beacon in state of Jammu & Kashmir .
ANNEXURES:
ANNEXURE A
Proforma For Data Collection
Page | 4
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study
(FS), Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction
services for improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION Chamkot (NH-701) for further development as NHDL specification with
paved shoulder as well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32
BRTF project Beacon in state of Jammu & Kashmir .
CHAPTER:1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
Border Roads Organisation is nation's most reputed, multifaceted, transnational, modern
construction Organisation committed to the strategic needs of the armed forces with a strong,
skilled and committed work force, a well ingrained value system and a strong environment
conscience. BRO is actively contributing to the socio economic development of the Border States
through its large scale contribution to roads infrastructure development. BRO has taken up a vast
program of Highway development in entire international border region from North-West to North-
East of India.
The Chief Engineer Project Beacon of BRO has been entrusted with the assignment of Engaging
Technical Consultant for preparation of Feasibility study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC
mode For Feasibility Study (Fs), Preparation Of Detailed Project Report (Dpr) And Preconstruction
Services for Newly Declared NH-701 Rafiabad – Kupwara – Chowkibal – Tangdhar – Chamkot Road
In 109 RCC Under 32 BRTF of Project Beacon in the state Of Jammu & Kashmir. This road has been
taken up as a part of overall development of road network in the state of Jammu and Kashmir and
will not only provide economic impetus to South Kashmir by linking Mughal road to Rajouri but will
also be facilitating Army by providing an alternative road link between Surankot and Rajouri. This
highway shall be safer due to being relatively inside the Line of Control (LoC).
The Chief Engineer (P) Beacon has engaged M/s HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT , Bhopal
for the services of the above assignment through competitive bidding. The Consultancy Contract
Agreement has been signed on 25th July 2018 between the Consultant and the Chief Engineers (P)
Beacon (BRO) under Ministry of Defence (MoD).
The consultant has commenced their services of the project immediately after signing the contract.
The location Map is given hereunder in Figure 1.1.
Page | 5
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study
(FS), Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction
services for improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION Chamkot (NH-701) for further development as NHDL specification with
paved shoulder as well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32
BRTF project Beacon in state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Page | 6
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study
(FS), Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction
services for improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION Chamkot (NH-701) for further development as NHDL specification with
paved shoulder as well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32
BRTF project Beacon in state of Jammu & Kashmir .
The Project was assigned the task of development of roads Sonamarg-Kargil-Leh, Leh-Karu -Upshi-
Loma-Dungti-Chusul, Karu-Tangtse-Chusul, Dugti-Demchok and Tangtse-Lukung-Phobrang,
comprising of approximately 1,250 Km in length. Subsequently, the Project was assigned the road
development works of entire J&K State. Later, road Leh-Upshi-Sarchu was also added to the
responsibility of Project Beacon and due to increase in its work load, two more Task Forces - 16
BRTF and 20 BRTF - also came under its folds.
With continuous increase in the jurisdiction of the Project Beacon and increase in No of roads under
development, a new Project “Sampark” with its HQ at Jammu was raised on 01 Jan 1975. Project
Sampark was tasked with the improvement and development of roads in Jammu -Rajouri - Poonch
Page | 7
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study
(FS), Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction
services for improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION Chamkot (NH-701) for further development as NHDL specification with
paved shoulder as well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32
BRTF project Beacon in state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Sector. After launch of “OP MEGHDOOT” in 1984, Project Beacon was once again bifurcated with
the raising of Project “Himank” for Ladakh Region.
Project Beacon is known as “Life Line of J&K”. Since its inception as the premier construction agency
of BRO, Project Beacon has been meeting the aspirations of the “Awaam” of Jammu & Kashmir and
the strategic needs of the Defense Forces. Braving the remote and inhospitable terrain, adverse
climatic and environmental conditions, as well as insurgency, the Project has constructed over
4,000 Km of roads as its contribution towards the development of road infrastructure in the state of
J&K. Not only does it connect various parts of the State, but also provides job opportunities to
approx 10,000 locals, thereby contributed towards socio-economic development of the region.
Page | 8
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study
(FS), Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction
services for improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION Chamkot (NH-701) for further development as NHDL specification with
paved shoulder as well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32
BRTF project Beacon in state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Requirements for road rehabilitation works, Upgrading and improvement of Highway design
including pavement and construction of new bridges and structures, road safety features
along with cost estimates and economic analysis.
Planning for Highway design & proposals for widening/ improvement of the existing road and
strengthening of the carriageway.
Seeking approval/clarification on the proposed work of DPR from the client including GAD
for new proposed bridge if any.
Project
Monitoring
Project Closure
Page | 9
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study
(FS), Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction
services for improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION Chamkot (NH-701) for further development as NHDL specification with
paved shoulder as well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32
BRTF project Beacon in state of Jammu & Kashmir .
The project road Rafiabad – Kupwara – Chowkibal – Tangdhar – Chamkot falls in north-west of the
state of Jammu & Kashmir. Being a border state, which has been in dispute with Pakistan, the
Jammu & Kashmir and therefore the road, are very important strategically. The terrain and climatic
conditions of the region make this state very peculiar.
Page | 10
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study
(FS), Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction
services for improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION Chamkot (NH-701) for further development as NHDL specification with
paved shoulder as well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32
BRTF project Beacon in state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Page | 11
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study
(FS), Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction
services for improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION Chamkot (NH-701) for further development as NHDL specification with
paved shoulder as well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32
BRTF project Beacon in state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Khor Patten Village( Amargarh) is provided with 400/220kv grid station for a reliable power supply
to area and Kashmir valley.This station is on GIS technology and connected to national grid through
400KV Transmission network.
Page | 12
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study
(FS), Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction
services for improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION Chamkot (NH-701) for further development as NHDL specification with
paved shoulder as well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32
BRTF project Beacon in state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Page | 13
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study
(FS), Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction
services for improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION Chamkot (NH-701) for further development as NHDL specification with
paved shoulder as well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32
BRTF project Beacon in state of Jammu & Kashmir .
heavy rainfall and floods. The shoulders are of clay soil with width varying from 1 to 2 m on both
side of carriageway.
2.6 Curves
The road passes through Mountainous / Hilly terrain with a lot of sharp curves in between
Chowkibal to Chamkot.
2.8 Embankment/ Cutting
Project road has been constructed mainly on hilly terrain and constructed by cutting of hill side.
2.9 Details of Existing Culverts:
The detail of existing culverts is listed below in Table 2.1:
Page | 14
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
1 2.100 Slab 0.2 m 1X1.5 m 6.2 9.2 1.5 m 1.7 m NO RHS Parapet Broked Retain
LHS and RHS Parapet
2 2.500 Slab 0.2 m 1x2m 6.2 9.2 2m 2.2 m NO Broked and steel Rec
reinforecement exposed
3 3.000 Slab 0.2 m 1x1.5 m 6.2 9.2 1.8m 2m NO Good Condition Widening
4 3.600 Slab 0.2 m 1x2 m 6.2 9.2 2.2m 2.4m NO Utility pipe exist Widening
5 4.100 Slab 0.3 m 1x3.6 m 6.2 9.2 2m 2.2 NO Already widened Rec
6 4.200 Slab 0.2 m 1x2 m 6.2 9.2 2.1 m 2.3 m NO Utility pipe Widening
7 4.700 Slab 0.35 m 1x6 m 6.2 9.2 1.8m 2m NO Already widened Rec
8 4.900 Slab 0.2 m 1X2.5 m 6.2 9.2 1.7m 1.9m - Good condition Widening
9 5.400 Slab 0.2 m 1x1.8 m 6.2 9.2 2m 2.2m NO Good condition Widening
10 5.600 Slab 0.2 m 1x1.5 m 6.2 9.2 1.8m 2m NO Already widened Rec
11 5.800 Slab 0.2 m 1x1.5 m 6.2 9.2 1.7m 2.1m NO Utility pipe Rec
Utility pipe,LHS already
12 6.400 Slab 0.2 m 1x1.5m 6.2 9.2 2.5m 2.6m NO Rec
widened
13 7.100 Slab 0.25 m 1x3.0 m 6.2 9.2 1.8m 2m NO Rec
14 7.500 Slab 0.2 m 1x1.5 m 6.2 9.2 1.5m 1.8m NO RHS Covered by grass Rec
15 7.700 Slab 0.2 m 1x1.8 m 7 11.2 2m 2.3m - Widening
16 7.900 Slab 0.2 m 1x2m 7 10.1 1.9m 2.1m NO Utility pipe Widening
17 8.300 Slab 0.3 m 1x3.6m 7 10.1 3.0m 3.5m NO Wing wall already widened Widening
18 8.600 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 12 2.2m 2.5m NO - Widening
Page | 15
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
19 9.000 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 12 2.1m 2.4m NO - Widening
20 9.600 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 9 1.8m 2m NO - Widening
21 9.800 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 12.5 1.5m 1.8m NO Fair condiition Widening
22 9.900 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 10 2.5m 2.8m - 30ᵒ Skew Anticlockwise Widening
23 9.905 Slab 0.3m 1x3.2m 7 9 2.2m 2.5m NO 30ᵒ Skew Anticlockwise Widening
24 9.920 Slab 0.2m 1x2.5m 7 13.5 1.8m 2m NO 45ᵒ Skew Anticlockwise Rec
25 9.960 Slab 0.2m 1x2.2m 7 9 1.6m 2m NO - Widening
26 11.100 Slab 0.2m 1X2.2 m 7 10.8 1.4m 1.8m NO - Widening
27 11.200 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 9 1.3m 1.7m NO - Widening
28 11.300 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 9.1 1.4m 1.8m NO Steel Showing , Repairing Rec
29 11.350 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 10.5 1.5m 1.8m Yes RHS Covered Rec
chocke chocke
30 11.600 chocked chocked chocked chocked chocked chocked Both side chocked Rec
d d
31 13.200 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 9 1.5m 1.8m NO Skew Clockwise Widening
32 14.700 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 9.5 1.8m 2.2m NO Wing wall, Damaged Rec
33 16.700 Slab 0.4m 1x3m 7 11.2 1m 1m NO RHS Wall Chocked Rec
34 16.750 Slab 0.35m 1x3m 7 11.5 1.8m 2.0 m NO LHS Shape Rec
35 16.900 Pipe 2m dia 7 10 2.8m 3m NO May be pipe
36 17.400 Slab 0.35m 1x3.6m 7 10 1.8m 2.0 m NO Irrigation canal Rec
37 17.700 Slab 0.2m 1x2 m 7 10 1m 1.5m NO Water flowing till soffit level Rec
38 18.300 Slab 0.2m 1x2.5m 7 10 1.4m 1.6m NO Irrigation canal Rec
Rec due to
39 18.320 Slab 0.35 m 1x4.5m 7 10 2.8m 3.0 m NO Already Widened
submerged
Page | 16
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
Fully Chocked and Flow to
40 18.400 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 10 - - NO Rec
Soffit level
41 18.800 Pipe 1x0.9m 7 8 1.2m 1.5m NO Both side parapet broked Rec
42 18.900 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 9 0.8m 1m NO Both side parapet broked Rec
43 20.200 Slab 0.4m 1x5m 7 8 1.8m 2m NO 20ᵒ skew anticlockwise Rec
44 22.000 Slab 0.2m 1x2 m 7 8 0.4m 0.6m NO RHS chocked Rec
45 24.100 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8 1.9m 2.2m NO Repairing Rec
46 24.400 Slab 0.2m 1x2.3m 7 8 1.6m 1.8m NO Parapet broked Rec
47 24.700 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 8 1.8m 2.1m NO Good Condition Widening
48 25.800 Pipe 1x0.9m dia 7 8 1.4m 1.7m NO Both side parapet broked Rec
49 26.200 Pipe 1x1.2m 7 8 NO Both side parapet broked Rec
50 26.400 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 8.7 1.8m 2m Yes Good Condition Widening
51 27.000 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 8.7 1.5m 1.8m NO Good Condition Widening
Steel reinforcement
52 27.500 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.7 1.9m 2.2m NO Rec
exposed
53 28.900 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.7 1.7m 1.9m NO Parapet broked Rec
54 29.200 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.7 1.5m 1.8m NO Both parapet broked Rec
55 29.700 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.7 1m 1.1m NO Both side parapet chocked Rec
Wing wall,Cleaning
56 30.000 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 8 1.8m 2.0m NO Widening
required
57 30.600 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 8 1.7m 2.1 NO Wing wall Widening
58 31.200 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 8 1.9m 2.2m NO Wing wall Widening
59 31.500 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 8 1.8m 2m NO - Widening
Page | 17
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
60 31.800 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 8 1.5m 1.8m NO - Widening
61 32.400 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8 1.5m 2m NO - Rec
Parapet not
62 32.900 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8 1.5m 1.8m NO exist,Inadequate vertical Rec
clearance
63 32.905 Slab 0.2m 1x2m 7 8 1.3m 1.7m NO Parapet wall not exist. Rec
64 33.100 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8 2m 2.8m wing wall Rec
65 33.200 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8 1.8m 2m NO Wing wall poor Rec
Utility pipe
66 33.700 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8 1.5m 1.8m NO Rec
Wing wall
67 34.000 Slab 0.2m 1x2.5m 7 8 1.2m 1.3m NO - Rec
68 34.300 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8 1.2m 1.5m NO Insufficient ventway Rec
69 34.350 Slab 0.2m 1x2.5m 7 8 0.8m 7m NO - Widening
RHS side covered with
70 35.400 Slab 0.2m 1x2.5m 7 8 0.3m 0.6m NO Rec
vegetation
71 35.600 Slab 0.4m 1x6m 7 8 4.2m 4.5m NO - Widening
72 36.000 Slab 0.15m 1x1m 7 8 0.4m 0.3m NO RHS side chocked Rec
73 36.300 Pipe 1x0.9 7 8 0.3m 0.5m NO Both side choked Rec
74 36.400 Pipe 1x0.9 7 8 0.6m 0.5m Both side choked Rec
75 36.500 Slab 0.2 1X1.5m 8 9 0.8m 1.0m NO Insufficient ventway Rec
76 36.900 Slab 0.2 1X1.5m 8 9 0.9m 1.3m NO Insufficient ventway Rec
RHS fully covered with
77 37.100 Slab 0.2 1X1.5m 8 9 0.5m 0.8m NO Rec
water
Page | 18
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
78 37.600 Slab 0.2 1X1.5m 8 9 0.5m 0.6m NO RHS side chocked Rec
79 39.600 Slab 0.2 1X2m 8 9 0.5m 0.7m NO LHS Chocked Rec
80 40.100 Slab 0.2 1x2m 8 9 1.2m 1.5m NO Cleaning / RHS side Rec
81 40.700 Slab 0.2 1x2m 8 9 0.3 0.5m NO Parapet wall not exist
82 40.800 Slab 0.2 1x2m 8 9 chocked chocked NO Chocked Rec
83 41.200 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 8 9 0.3m 0.6m NO Half chock Rec
84 41.800 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 8 9 0.5m 1.0m NO Both side parapet broked Rec
85 42.200 Slab 0.5 1x6.0m 8 9 3m 3.2m NO - Widening
86 42.500 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 8 9 1.2m 1.5m NO Insufficient ventway Rec
87 43.000 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 8 9 1.1m 1.4m NO RHS Parapet Damaged Rec
88 43.300 Slab 0.2 1X1.5m 8 9 1.1m 1.2m NO Parapet damaged Rec
89 43.600 Slab 0.2 1X1.5m 8 9 0.4m 0.6m NO Parapet damaged Rec
90 43.800 Slab 0.2 1X2m 8 9 0.6m 0.8m NO Parapet damaged Widening
Parapet damaged/
91 44.100 Slab 0.2 1X1.5m 8 9 0.6m 0.8m NO Rec
Insufficient ventway
RHS Damaged/ Inadequate
92 44.200 Slab 0.2 1x3 m 8 9 1.2m 1.4m NO Rec
vertical clearance
93 44.700 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 8 9 1.2m 1.4m NO Parapet damaged Rec
94 44.800 Slab 0.2 1x3 8 9 1.8m 2.0m NO - Widening
95 44.900 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 8 9 0.8m 1m NO Damaged Parapet Rec
96 45.000 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 8 9 0.7m 1m NO Insufficient ventway Rec
97 45.800 Slab 0.25 1x3m 8 9 1m 1.3m NO - Widening
Page | 19
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
98 46.000 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 8 9 0.8m 1m NO RHS Chocked Rec
Parapet railing not exist in
99 46.300 Slab 0.6 1x6m 8 9 4.8m 5m NO Widening
RHS side
100 47.000 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 8 9 - 1m NO LHS Covered Rec
101 47.700 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 8 9 0.8m 1.0m Yes Poor condition on LHS Rec
102 47.800 Slab 0.3 1x3.6m 8 9 1.0m 1.5m NO - Widening
103 48.900 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 8 9 0.4m 0.5m NO LHS half chocked Rec
104 49.700 Slab 0.3 1x3 m 8 9 0.8m 1m NO - Widening
105 50.100 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 8 9 1m 1.5m NO Insufficient ventway Rec
106 50.400 Slab 0.2 1x2m 8 9 1.9m 2 NO - Rec
107 50.500 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 0.5m 0.8 NO RHS Chocked Rec
Insufficient vertical
108 50.700 Slab 0.2 1x2m 7 8 0.3 0.5 NO Rec
clearance
109 50.900 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 0.3 0.5 NO Insufficient ventway Rec
110 51.000 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 0.8 1 NO - Rec
Parapet wall
111 51.300 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 0.7 1.1m NO damaged/Inadequate Rec
vertical ckearance
Parapet wall not exist in
112 51.500 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 1.1m 1.8m NO RHS/ Inadequate vertical Rec
clearance
Parapet wall not exist in
113 51.800 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 1.7m 1.9m NO Rec
RHS
114 52.100 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 1.4m 2.0m NO Inadequate vertical Rec
Page | 20
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
clearance
115 52.700 Slab 0.2 1x1.8m 7 8 1.8m 2.1m NO Damaged Rec
116 53.900 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 1.2 1.5 NO Inadequate ventway Rec
117 54.200 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 1m 2.5m NO Inadequate ventway Rec
118 54.800 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 chock 2.5m NO Inadequate ventway Rec
119 55.000 Slab 0.2 1x1.2m 7 8 - 3m NO Inadequate ventway Rec
120 55.600 Slab 0.2 1x2.0m 7 8 2.3 2.5 NO Parapet RHS wall damaged Rec
121 56.700 chocked chock chock 7 8 chock chock NO LHS Chocked Rec
RHS full chocked ,
122 57.000 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 0.4 0.5 NO Rec
Inadequate ventway
123 58.000 Slab 0.2 1x2m 7 8 2 4 NO RHS hill Widening
124 58.050 Slab 0.2 1x2.5m 7 8 2m 4m NO - Widening
Parapet not exist,RHS utility
125 58.300 Slab 0.35 1X4m 7 8 3m 4m NO Widening
pipe
RHS utility pipe , RHS
126 58.700 Slab 0.3 1x3m 7 8 NO Widening
parapet broked
127 59.200 Slab 0.2 1x2m 7 8 1m 1.2m NO - Widening
128 59.300 Slab 0.2 1x2m 7 8 0.4m 0.5m NO RHS chocked Rec
129 59.500 Slab 0.2 1x2.5m 7 8 1.2m 2m NO RHS Parapet not exist Widening
130 59.900 Slab 0.2 1x2m 7 8 0.8m 1m Yes Parapet broked Widening
131 60.000 Pipe 1x0.9m 7 8 chocked chocked NO chocked Rec
132 60.100 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 1.4m 1.5m NO Inadequate ventway Rec
133 60.300 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 1m 1.6m NO LHS bus stand Rec
Page | 21
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
134 60.400 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 1.3m 1.5m NO RHS Parapet wall Damaged Rec
135 60.700 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 1.5m 1.8m NO Inadequate ventway Rec
136 60.800 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 0.6m 0.8m NO Inadequate ventway Rec
137 61.000 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 1.5m 2m NO Inadequate ventway Rec
138 61.100 Slab 0.2 1x2m 7 8 0.5m 0.6m NO Inadequate ventway Rec
139 61.700 Slab 0.25 1X1.7 m 7 13.5 0.6 1.1 m NO Skew/NO Parapet Widening
IL=3m No Parapet,Utility Pipe
140 61.950 Slab 0.23 1 x 1.5 m 7 10.2 1.5m NO Widening
BL=2m exists ahead of LHS
141 62.100 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 m 7 8 0.8m Choked NO Lhs full chocked Widening
RHS parapet
142 62.700 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 m 7 9 0.8m 1m NO damaged,Reinforcement Reconstruction
Exposed,Choked 10%
IL=3.6m
143 62.800 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 m 7 8 1m NO Widening
BL=5m
LHS Half choked, RHS Half
144 62.900 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 m 7 9 0.5 m 1m NO choked, Reinforcement Reconstruction
Exposed
145 63.200 Slab 0.2 1x2 m 7 9 0.8m 2 NO Both side parapet broken Widening
146 63.500 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 m 7 9 1.1 1.2 NO Reinforcement Exposed Reconstruction
147 63.800 Slab 0.2 1X1.8 m 7 10 1m 1.7m NO Widening
Page | 22
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
Covered
with
148 64.000 Chocked - - 7 - Chocked - LHS choked, RHS fencing Reconstruction
Vegetati
on
149 64.200 Slab 0.3 1x4.2 m 7 10 2.5m IL=3.5 NO Widening
Utility Pipe exists ahead of
150 64.400 Slab 0.4 1x5m 7 10 2.5m 5m NO Widening
LHS
151 64.520 Slab 0.2 1x2 m 7 9 1m 2m NO Already widened Widening
0.6 Cushion, wing wall
152 64.800 Slab 0.3 1x3.5 m 7 9 4 6m NO Reconstruction
damaged
153 65.300 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 7 10 1.5 1.5 NO Reconstruction
154 65.400 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 11 Chocked 1.5 NO Reinforcement Exposed Reconstruction
155 66.100 Chocked Chocked - - - - - - Fully Chocked Reconstruction
10%Choked, Reinforcement
156 66.400 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 9.5 0.8m 1m NO Reconstruction
Exposed
157 66.450 Slab 0.25 1x3 7 9.5 5.8m 6.0m NO Cushion 3.9 Widening
158 68.000 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 9 1.5m 1.6m NO Parapet RHS=0.5m height Widening
1.2m Rhs level from
159 68.200 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 9 0.5m 1.2m NO Widening
parapet to base level
160 68.450 Slab 0.4 1x4.5m 7 8.5 3m 3.8m NO Abutment poor condition Reconstruction
161 69.500 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8.5 0.5 1.4 - Both parapet broken Reconstruction
162 69.950 Slab 0.2 1x2 7 8.5 1m 2m NO Widening
163 70.100 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 7 9 1m IL=1.5m NO Slab broken,Abutment Reconstruction
Page | 23
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
BL=2.5
broken
m
164 70.250 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 7 10 1m 3m NO Widening
165 70.500 Slab 0.2 1X1.5 m 7 10 2 2.5 NO Abutment broken Reconstruction
166 70.750 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 11.5 chocked 3.5 m NO Rhs choked Reconstruction
167 70.900 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 11.5 0.8m IL=2.5m NO RHS parapet broked Widening
168 71.200 Slab 0.2 1x1.8m 7 8.5 1.5m 2.5m NO Abutment damaged Reconstruction
Full
169 71.740 Slab 0.2 1X1.5 m 7 8.2 2 NO RHS Fully Chocked Reconstruction
Chocked
Full
170 71.900 Slab 0.25 1x1.8 m 7 10.4 1.1 NO RHS Fully Chocked Reconstruction
Chocked
Full RHS Fully Chocked,LHS half
171 72.000 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 m 7 10.4 0.5 NO Reconstruction
Chocked Chocked
Full
172 72.600 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 m 7 8.3 1 NO LHS Full Chocked Reconstruction
Chocked
Full LHS Full Chocked, RHS
173 72.900 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8.3 0.8 NO Reconstruction
Chocked vegetation covered
Full
174 73.200 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 m 7 8.3 2 NO LHS Full Chocked Reconstruction
Chocked
Full
175 73.500 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 m 7 8.3 1 NO LHS fully chocked Reconstruction
Chocked
Full LHS Half Chocked, RHS Full
176 73.600 Slab 0.25 1x1.8 m 7 9 0.5 NO Reconstruction
Chocked Chocked
Page | 24
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
177 74.000 Slab 0.4 1x3.5m 7 8.5 2.8 4.2 NO LHS Utility pipe Reconstruction
178 74.200 Slab 0.25 1x1.8 m 7 8.5 Chock 1 NO LHS Chocked Reconstruction
179 75.100 Slab 0.4m 1x3 m 7 8.5 1.5 4 NO Reconstruction
I.L=1.5
180 76.700 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.5 Chock NO LHS Chocked Reconstruction
B.L=3.5
181 76.900 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.5 Chock 1.5 NO RHS Chocked Reconstruction
182 77.300 Slab 0.25m 1x2.5 m 7 8.5 Chock 4 NO LHS Chocked Reconstruction
183 78.400 Chocked Chocked Chocked 7 9 - - - Both side fully chocked Reconstruction
184 78.800 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.5 Chock 3.5 NO RHS Chocked Reconstruction
LHS Chocked, Steel
185 79.000 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 9 Chock 3 NO Reconstruction
reinforcement exposed
186 80.350 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 9 Chock 2m NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
187 81.000 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 9 Chock 1.5m NO LHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
188 81.400 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.5 Chock 1.5m NO LHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
189 81.450 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.5 Chock 1.5m NO LHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
190 82.000 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.5 Chock 1.5m NO LHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
191 82.100 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.5 Chock 1.2m NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
192 82.200 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.5 Chock 3.0m NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
193 82.300 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.5 Chock 1.5m NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
194 83.100 Slab 0.25m 1x2.5m 7 8.5 Chock 4.0m NO LHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
I.L=4.0
195 84.200 Slab 0.2m 1X3.5 m 7 8.5 Chock NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
B.L=8.0
Page | 25
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
196 84.350 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.5 Chock 1.5 m NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
197 84.800 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.5 Chock 1.5 m NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
I.L=2.5
198 85.010 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.5 1m NO RHS side utility pipe exist Reconstruction
B.L=7.5
chocke chocke
199 85.150 chocked chocked chocked chocked chocked chocked chocked Reconstruction
d d
200 85.300 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 8.5 Chock 2m NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
201 85.550 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 9 Chock 1.5m NO RHS Side Chocked
202 85.700 Slab 0.2m 1X1.5m 7 9 Chock 2m NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
203 86.100 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 9 Chock 1.5m NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
I.L=2
204 86.750 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 10 Chock NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
B.L=4
205 86.800 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 10 Chock 2.5m NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
206 87.300 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 6 8 Chock 2.5m NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
207 87.500 Chocked Chocked Chocked 6 9 Chock Chock NO Chocked Reconstruction
208 87.650 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 6 8 Chock Chock NO Both side Chocked Reconstrcution
I.L=2.5
209 88.500 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 6 8 Chock NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstrcution
B.L=5
I.L=2
210 90.000 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 6 8 Chock NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
B.L=2.5
I.L=2
211 90.400 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 5 9 Chock NO RHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
B.L=3
212 92.500 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 5 9.1 Chock 2.5 NO LHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
Page | 26
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
IL=1.5m
213 93.100 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 6 6 Chock NO LHS Side Chocked Reconstruction
BL=2m
IL=2.5m
214 93.200 Slab 0.2m 1x3.5 6 9 1.1 BL=3.7 NO LHS Utility Pipe Widening
m
215 93.450 Slab 0.3m 1x4m 6 7.5 Chock 2.5 NO LHS Side Chocked Widening
216 93.850 Slab 0.2m 1x1.5m 7 9 1.2 4 NO Widening
1m,Half IL=1.5
217 93.950 Slab 0.2 1x2m 7 9 NO RHS half Choked Widening
choked BL=5
Half
218 94.300 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 9 IL=3 NO RHS half Choked Widening
Choked
IL=2
219 94.600 Slab 0.23 1x2m 6.5 9 Choked NO RHS half Choked Reconstruction
BL=4.5
IL=2
220 95.100 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 6.5 9 Choked NO RHS Chocked Reconstruction
BL=5
IL=2 .6
221 95.250 Slab 0.25 1x3m 6.5 12 2.8 NO Widening
BL=
222 95.510 Slab 0.25 1x3m 7 8.5 1.9 2m NO RHS utility pipe exist Reconstruction
223 95.650 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8.5 Chocked 1.5m NO Reconstruction
224 95.800 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 6.5 9 1.5 2.2m Widening
IL=1.5
225 95.900 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 6.5 9 Chocked NO Lhs full chocked Widening
BL=2.5
Page | 27
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
IL=2.5
226 96.300 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 6.5 9 1 NO LHS utility pipe exist Reconstruction
BL=3.5
IL=2.5
227 96.550 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 6.5 9 1 NO Widening
BL=6
IL=2.5
228 96.900 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 6.5 9 Chocked NO RHS chocked Reconstruction
BL=6
229 97.100 Slab 0.25 1x2.5m 6.5 9 Chocked Chocked NO Both side chocked Reconstruction
230 97.450 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 5 7 Chocked 2m NO RHS chocked Reconstruction
IL=2 .5
231 97.550 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 5 7 Chocked NO RHS chocked Reconstruction
BL=4.5
232 98.100 Slab 0.25 1x3m 5 7 0.8m 3m NO Reconstruction
IL=2m
233 98.500 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 5.5 7 choked NO RHS choked Reconstruction
BL=5m
234 99.400 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 1.3 2 NO Abutment damaged Reconstruction
235 99.500 Slab 0.2 choked 8 9 choked 2.2m NO RHS choked Reconstruction
100.10
236 Slab 0.2 1x2.2m 7.5 8.5 0.8m choked NO LHS choked Reconstruction
0
100.70 RHS 10% choked, parapet
237 Slab 0.2 1x4m 6 7 0.8m 1.5m NO Reconstruction
0 broken
IL=2.7
101.90
238 Slab 0.3 1x3.6m 6 7 1.5m B.L=4.3 NO Reinforcement Exposed Reconstruction
0
m
103.80
239 Slab 0.2 Choked - - - - NO Choked Reconstruction
0
Page | 28
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
104.30
240 Slab 0.2 1x2.5m 5.5 6.5 Choked 2m NO RHS Choked Reconstruction
0
103.90
241 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 5.5 6.5 Choked 2.5m NO RHS Choked Reconstruction
0
105.40
242 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 5.5 6.5 Choked 2m NO RHS Choked Reconstruction
0
105.41
243 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 5.5 6.5 Choked 1.5m NO RHS Choked Reconstruction
0
106.10
244 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 6.5 6.5 Choked 2.0m NO RHS Choked Reconstruction
0
106.35
245 Slab 0.2 1x2.5m 6.5 6.5 0.8 2.0m NO RHS utility pipe Reconstruction
0
107.20 IL=2.5
246 Slab 0.2 1x2m 6 7 0.6m NO Reconstruction
0 BL=5
107.60
247 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 6 7 0.6m 2.5m NO Reconstruction
0
107.80
248 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 6 7 Choked 2.5m NO RHS Chocked Reconstruction
0
108.50
249 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 6 7 Choked 2 NO RHS Choked Reconstruction
0
109.30
250 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 1m 1.2m NO Reconstruction
0
109.45 IL=2
251 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 8 Choked NO RHS Chocked Reconstruction
0 BL=8.5
252 109.92 Slab 0.200m 1x2.5m 7.8 8.8 1.5m 2m NO Reconstruction
Page | 29
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
0
112.10
253 Slab 0.400m 1x5.8m 5.8 7.8 1.6m 1.7 m NO Carriageway poor condition Reconstruction
0
112.48
254 Slab 0.200m 1x1.5m 5.8 7.8 0.5m 0.2m NO Reconstruction
0
112.60
255 Slab 0.200m 1x2m 5.8 7.8 1.5m Chocked NO LHS Choked Reconstruction
0
112.85
256 Slab 0.2 1x2 5.8 7.8 2.5m 1m NO 10% Choked Widening
0
113.20
257 Slab 0.3 1x2.7m 5.8 7.8 1.9 2 NO Parapet =0.6 Widening
0
113.50
258 Slab 0.25 1x2.5m 6 7.5 Choked 1.5 NO LHS Choked,Parapet broken Reconstruction
0
113.60
259 Slab 0.2 1x2.0m 7 9 0.5 1.5 NO Parapet =0.6 Widening
0
113.70
260 Slab 0.2 1x2.6m 7 9 1m 1.8m NO Parapet =0.6 Widening
0
114.75
261 Slab 0.2 1x1.5m 7 9.5 1m 1.5m NO Widening
0
114.92 IL=6
262 Slab 0.3 1x4m 7 9 1m NO No Parapet Widening
0 BL=15
115.05
263 Slab 0.25 1x2 7 9 0.5m 1m NO Rhs Utillity Pipe exists Widening
0
115.25
264 Slab 0.2 1x3 7 9 2.5m 3m NO No Parapet Widening
0
Page | 30
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-701)
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as well as
district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in state of
Jammu & Kashmir .
Presence of Scour
Span level (Upto
Type of
Arrangemen Carriage Width parapet/railing
Structur Thicknes
S. Existin t and Total -way of top)
es (Pipe. s of Slab Remarks Recommendations
No g CH. Ventway width Culver
Slab Box. (m) D/S
(No.x Lengh) (m) t (m) U/S Side
Arch) Side
(m) (m)
(m)
115.70
265 Slab 0.2 1x2 7 9 1m 2.5m NO Widening
0
IL=2m
116.30
266 Slab 0.2 1x2 7 9 1.8m BL=4.5 NO Widening
0
m
116.85 IL=2m
267 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 7 9 1 NO Widening
0 BL=5m
117.00 IL=2m
268 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 7 8 choked NO RHS Chocked Widening
0 BL=5m
117.50
269 Slab 0.2 1x1.5 7 8 0.2 IL=3 NO Widening
0
119.20
270 Slab 0.25 1x3 7 8 0.2 0.2 NO Water at 0.2m from soffit Widening
0
Page | 31
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Page | 32
Highway Engineering Consultant
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Location
Type Depth of Super Over
Sl.n as per Existing Span Clear HL/
of Super- Structure Substructure Foundation All Conditions Recommendation
o Inventor Ch. Arrangement(m) Width SubM
Bridge Structure(m) Type width
y
Existing
Retain with
Bridge
Rehabilitation And
Condition is
Stone May be Repairing/Replacin
1 9+060 3+370 MNB 2x9.8 1.5 I-Girder 6.6m 7.2m HL fair.
Masonry open g of expansion joint,
But Steel
Bearing & Drainage
Railling
spots.
damaged.
Retain with
Existing Rehabilitation And
Box May be Bridge Repairing/Replacin
2 18+980 6+800 MNB 1x41.1 2.7 RCC 7.5m 12m HL
Gider open Condition is g of expansion joint,
fair. Bearing & Drainage
spots.
Existing
11+00 May be 11.7 Bridge Retain with
3 24+995 MNB 7x5.4 0.5 RCC Box RCC 8.3m HL
0 open m Condition is Rehabilitation
fair.
Existing
Bridge Retain with
13+40 Solid Stone May be 10.5 Condition is Rehabilitation And
4 28+000 MNB 1x7.6 0.8 9.7m HL
0 Slab Masonry open m fair. But Repairing of parapet
parapet wall wall.
damaged.
Page | 33
Highway Engineering Consultant
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Location
Type Depth of Super Over
Sl.n as per Existing Span Clear HL/
of Super- Structure Substructure Foundation All Conditions Recommendation
o Inventor Ch. Arrangement(m) Width SubM
Bridge Structure(m) Type width
y
Retain with
Existing Rehabilitation And
17+20 Box May be 11.8 Bridge Repairing/Replacin
5 29+400 MJB 2X30.5 1.6 RCC 7.8M HL
0 Gider open m Condition is g of expansion joint,
fair. Bearing & Drainage
spots.
Retain with
Existing Rehabilitation And
23+00 May be Bridge Repairing/Replacin
6 37+620 MNB 1X47 2.9 I-Girder RCC 7.8m 8.1m HL
0 open Condition is g of expansion joint,
fair. Bearing & Drainage
spots.
Existing Retain with
28+10 Solid Stone May be Bridge Rehabilitation And
7 44+270 MNB 1x6.8 0.5 6.5m 9m HL
0 Slab Masonry open Condition is Jacketing/Strengthi
fair. ng.
Existing Retain with
29+90 Solid Stone May be Bridge Rehabilitation And
8 50+450 MNB 1X6.6 0.4 11m 12m HL
0 Slab Masonry open Condition is Jacketing/Strengthi
fair. ng.
Vertical
clearance of
Existing
33+90 Solid Stone May be
9 55+130 MNB 1x7.6 0.5 7.6m 8.4m SUB Bridge is not Reconstruction .
0 Slab Masonry open
sufficient as
per codal
provision.
Page | 34
Highway Engineering Consultant
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Location
Type Depth of Super Over
Sl.n as per Existing Span Clear HL/
of Super- Structure Substructure Foundation All Conditions Recommendation
o Inventor Ch. Arrangement(m) Width SubM
Bridge Structure(m) Type width
y
Retain with
Existing Rehabilitation And
38+20 May be 11.1 Bridge Repairing/Replacin
10 60+150 MNB 1X51.3 3 I-Girder RCC 7.5m HL
0 open m Condition is g of expansion joint,
fair. Bearing & Drainage
spots.
Existing
38+80 Solid May be 10.8 11.8 Bridge Retain with
11 63+400 MNB 3x11.8 0.8 RCC HL
0 Slab open m m Condition is Rehabilitation
fair.
Existing
Bridge
Condition is
42+80 Solid Stone May be poor. Pier
12 64+900 MNB 2x3.5 0.25 8.2m 9.8m HL Reconstruction .
0 Slab Masonry open and
abutment
condition is
very poor.
Existing
Bridge
Condition is
poor.
44+65 Solid Stone May be
13 65+570 MNB 1x7.3 0.6 7.5m 9.1m HL Abutment Reconstruction .
0 Slab Masonry open
condition is
very poor.
Parapet wall
damaged.
14 75+500 52+90 MNB 2x9.5 0.8 Solid Stone May be 5.6m 6.2m HL Abutment is Reconstruction .
Page | 35
Highway Engineering Consultant
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Location
Type Depth of Super Over
Sl.n as per Existing Span Clear HL/
of Super- Structure Substructure Foundation All Conditions Recommendation
o Inventor Ch. Arrangement(m) Width SubM
Bridge Structure(m) Type width
y
damaged
and steel
0 Slab Masonry open railling also
in poor
condition.
Retain with
Existing Rehabilitation And
61+60 Box May be Bridge Repairing/Replacin
15 MNB 1x31.0 2 RCC 7.6m 12m HL
0 Gider open Condition is g of expansion joint,
fair. Bearing & Drainage
spots.
Retain with
Existing Rehabilitation And
62+90 Box May be Bridge Repairing/Replacin
16 75+620 MNB 1x46 3.6 RCC 7.8m 12m HL
0 Gider open Condition is g of expansion joint,
fair. Bearing & Drainage
spots.
Retain with
Existing Rehabilitation And
68+75 Box May be Bridge Repairing/Replacin
17 MNB 1x36.4 2.1 RCC 7.8m 12m HL
0 Gider open Condition is g of expansion joint,
fair. Bearing & Drainage
spots.
18 100+5 MNB 1x6.8 0.5 Solid Stone May be 7.8m 8.8m Sub Existing Reconstruction .
00 Slab Masonry open bridge
condition is
fair. But its
Page | 36
Highway Engineering Consultant
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Location
Type Depth of Super Over
Sl.n as per Existing Span Clear HL/
of Super- Structure Substructure Foundation All Conditions Recommendation
o Inventor Ch. Arrangement(m) Width SubM
Bridge Structure(m) Type width
y
submersible.
Existing
bridge
104+0 Solid Stone May be
19 MNB 1x6.9 0.5 4.3m 8.6m Sub condition is Reconstruction .
00 Slab Masonry open
fair. But its
submersible.
Existing
Bridge is
submersible
114+3 Solid Stone May be
20 MNB 1x7 0.5 7m 9m Sub and Reconstruction .
00 Slab Masonry open
abutment in
poor
condition.
Page | 37
Highway Engineering Consultant
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
There are a total of 290 structures existing in the project road. Out of total 290 nos, 1 Major Bridge, 19 nos Minor Bridges, 256 nos Slab culvert, 7 nos pipe culverts and
7 nos Chocked CulvertsCauseways exist along the project road. No railway track crosses the project highway alignment at any of the locations. There are no grade
separator/ flyover/ underpasses in the existing alignment.
The summary of the structures inventory is given below in Table 2.3
Table 2.3: Summary of Existing Structures
Major Bridge 01 01
1 Minor Bridge 19 19
2 Slab Culvert 256 256
3 Pipe Culvert 07 07
4 Chocked Culverts 07 07
Total 290 290
Page | 38
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Chainage (KM)
Sr.No. Village Name
From To
RAFIABAD TO CHOWKIBAL (Section-I)
1 0+000 0+300 Rafiabad
2 0+300 0+600 Water Gun
3 1+250 2+000 Palpura
4 1+300 1+400 Palpura
5 2+200 2+800 Thukurpura
6 2+800 3+600 Nasalpura
7 4+300 5+800 karalgund
8 8+400 10+300 langhate
9 10+720 14+800 Hardwara
10 14+800 15+050 Braripura
11 15+200 17+450 kulangaon
12 17+450 19+000 Wadhpura
13 19+400 20+050 Jagatpura
Page | 39
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Chainage (KM)
Sr.No. Village Name
From To
14 21+150 21+800 Nutunsa
15 22+200 24+500 Arampura
16 24+500 25+450 Bramri
17 25+450 30+400 Drugmulla
18 30+400 30+600 KUPWADA
19 30+600 35+400 KUPWADA
20 35+400 38+600 Batergaun
21 38+600 39+700 Hirri Bala
22 39+700 39+750 Bhedrapura
23 39+750 45+300 Trehgam
24 45+300 47+000 Shumnag
25 47+000 49400 Karalpura
26 49400 50250 Rawatpura
27 50250 51550 Niyari
28 51550 52+250 Rawat pura
29 52+400 52+850 mukamkhali pura
30 52+850 54+700 Panzgon
31 54+700 55+100 Redigaun
32 55+100 57+850 Chowkibal
CHOWKIBAL TO CHAMKOT (Section-II)
33 57+850 58+450 Chowkibal
34 58+450 62+850 MARASIRI
35 62+850 65+850 RANGWAR
36 65+850 83+500 TEEPEE
37 83+500 95+650 SADHNA
38 95+650 102+150 TANGDHAR
39 102+150 106+670 BAGHBELLA
40 106+670 110+450 TANGDHAR
41 110+450 113+450 KARNAH
42 113+450 116+150 CHAMKOT
2.13 Terrain
The whole project road stretch passes through Hilly/Mountainous terrain and the same is tabulated
below in Table 2.5:
Table 2.5: Type of Terrain
Chainage (KM)
Sr.No. Village Name Type of Terrain
From To
RAFIABAD TO CHOWKIBAL (Section-I)
1 0+000 0+300 Rafiabad Plain / Rolling
2 0+300 0+600 Water Gun Plain / Rolling
3 1+250 2+000 Palpura Plain / Rolling
4 1+300 1+400 Palpura Plain / Rolling
Page | 40
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Chainage (KM)
Sr.No. Village Name Type of Terrain
From To
5 2+200 2+800 Thukurpura Plain / Rolling
6 2+800 3+600 Nasalpura Plain / Rolling
7 4+300 5+800 karalgund Plain / Rolling
8 8+400 10+300 langhate Plain / Rolling
9 10+720 14+800 Hardwara Plain / Rolling
10 14+800 15+050 Braripura Plain / Rolling
11 15+200 17+450 kulangaon Plain / Rolling
12 17+450 19+000 Wadhpura Plain / Rolling
13 19+400 20+050 Jagatpura Plain / Rolling
14 21+150 21+800 Nutunsa Plain / Rolling
15 22+200 24+500 Arampura Plain / Rolling
16 24+500 25+450 Bramri Plain / Rolling
17 25+450 30+400 Drugmulla Plain / Rolling
18 30+400 30+600 KUPWADA Plain / Rolling
19 30+600 35+400 KUPWADA Plain / Rolling
20 35+400 38+600 Batergaun Plain / Rolling
21 38+600 39+700 Hirri Bala Plain / Rolling
22 39+700 39+750 Bhedrapura Plain / Rolling
23 39+750 45+300 Trehgam Plain / Rolling
24 45+300 47+000 Shumnag Plain / Rolling
25 47+000 49400 Karalpura Plain / Rolling
26 49+400 50+250 Rawatpura Plain / Rolling
27 50+250 51+550 Niyari Plain / Rolling
28 51+550 52+250 Rawat pura Plain / Rolling
29 52+400 52+850 mukamkhali pura Plain / Rolling
30 52+850 54+700 Panzgon Plain / Rolling
31 54+700 55+100 Redigaun Plain / Rolling
32 55+100 57+850 Chowkibal Plain / Rolling
CHOWKIBAL TO CHAMKOT (Section-II)
33 57+850 58+450 Chowkibal Hilly/Mountainous
34 58+450 62+850 MARASIRI Hilly/Mountainous
35 62+850 65+850 RANGWAR Hilly/Mountainous
36 65+850 83+500 TEEPEE Hilly/Mountainous
37 83+500 95+650 SADHNA Hilly/Mountainous
38 95+650 102+150 TANGDHAR Hilly/Mountainous
39 102+150 106+670 BAGHBELLA Hilly/Mountainous
40 106+670 110+450 TANGDHAR Hilly/Mountainous
41 110+450 113+450 KARNAH Hilly/Mountainous
42 113+450 116+150 CHAMKOT Hilly/Mountainous
The project road alignment crosses through very environment-sensitive region.
2.14 Drainage
Lined drain is found only at the settlement are as where the condition is poor due to lack
of maintenance. Unlined drain also found at short stretches with vegetation.
Page | 41
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
2.23 Junctions
There are number of Junctions along the project road. The project road has 2 major and 76 minor
junction, which are to be improved at-grade with proper turning radius, signs, speed breakers (on
minor roads) and markings. The cross roads should be improved by overlay rehabilitation of
shoulders, etc for a length of 25m from the edge of proposed carriageway.
Special attention will be paid to all junctions and cross road locations including checking of safe
intersection sight distance and propose improvements to enhance the sight distance.
Page | 42
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Page | 43
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Page | 44
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
construction works, the existing road should be repaired by strengthening of pavement and
shoulders, closing the potholes, etc.
Barricading should be provided to separate the construction area and necessary road safety
furniture like sign boards, reflectors lightings will be provided.
Page | 45
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
schedule of activities.
• After the mobilization, a start-up meeting will be held between the Consultant and the
representative of Client’s Office. The objective of the above and subsequent meetings at this
stage would be to finalize the program for data collection and review, and also to discuss the
quality assurance program and methodology, etc. Likely modifications to the methodology
and work program, as required, will be discussed and resolved during the meetings. The
meeting is important considering the location of the project road location.
• Points to be discussed and resolved during the start-up phase identification of data
requirements and sources, reports and information relevant to the studies;
• Finalization of the study methodology;
• Meetings and facilitation from other Govt. / Semi Govt. agencies; and
• Role of Client in fulfilling the objectives of the proposed Consultancy Services;
Stage wise activities to be performed & incorporated in the various reports are tabulated hereunder
in Table 3.1:
Table 3.1: Stage wise Project Activities
Stages Description
Inception Stage 1
Report I. Project appreciation.
II. Detailed methodology to meet the requirements of the TOR
finalized in consultation with the CE (P) Sampark (BRO) officers;
including scheduling of various sub activities to be carried out for
completion of various stage of the work; stating out clearly their
approach & methodology for project preparation after due to
inspection of the entire project stretch and collection/collation of
necessary information;
III. Task assignment and Manning Schedule;
IV. Work programme;
V. Performa for data collection;
VI. Design standards and proposed for cross-section;
VII. Development plans being implemented and proposed for
implementation in the near future by the local bodies and the
possible impact of such development plans on the overall scheme
Page | 47
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Stages Description
Page | 48
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Stages Description
Page | 49
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Stages Description
charts and also the estimated quantities with mass haul diagram including
possible end use with leads involved, the details of sampling and testing carried
out and results in the form of important index values with possible end use
thereof.
The detailed design for all features should be carried out as per the
requirements of the Design Standards for the project. However, there may be
situations wherein it has not been possible to strictly adhere to the design
standards due to the existing site conditions, restrictions and other
considerations. The report should clearly bring out the details of these aspect
and the standards adopted.
The materials Report shall also include details of sampling, testing and test
results obtained in respect physical properties of sub-grade soils. The
information shall be presented in tabular as well as in graphical representations
and schematic diagrams. The Report shall present soil profiles along the
alignment.
The material Report should also clearly indicate the locations of areas with
problematic soils. Recommendations concerning the improvement of such soils
for use in the proposed construction works, such as stabilization (cement, lime,
mechanical) should be included in the Report.
Volume - IV, Environmental Assessment Report including Environmental
Management Plan (EMP) & Resettlement Action Plan (RAP): The Report
shall be prepared conforming to the Guidelines of the Government of India, State
Government and World Bank / ADB as appropriate for construction package.
Volume - V, Technical Specifications: The MORT&H’s Technical Specifications
for Road and Bridge works shall be followed for this study. However, Volume IV:
Technical Specifications shall contain the special technical specifications which
are not covered by MOST Specifications for Roads and Bridges (latest edition /
revision) and also specific quality control norms for the construction of works.
Volume - VI, Rate Analysis: This volume will present the analysis of rates for
all items of works. The details of unit rate of materials at source, carriage
charges, any other applicable charges, labour rates, and machine charges as
considered in arriving at unit rates will be included in this volume.
Volume - VII, Cost Estimates: This volume will present the contract package
wise cost of each item of work as well as a summary of total cost.
Volume - VIII, Bill of Quantities: This volume shall contain the package-wise
detailed Bill of Quantities for all items of works.
Volume - IX, Drawing Volume: All drawings forming part of this volume shall
be ‘good for construction’ drawings. All plan and profile drawings will be
prepared in scale 1:250V and 1:2500H scale to cover one km in one sheet. In
addition this volume will contain ‘good for construction’ drawings for the
following:
Horizontal Alignment and Longitudinal Profile.
Cross-section @ 50m interval along the alignment within ROW Typical Cross-
Sections with details of pavement structure.
Page | 50
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Stages Description
LA & Stage 6
Clearance II LA & Clearances shall be submitted by the consultant in accordance to
Report the applicable laws/ rules in the state of Jammu and Kashmir.
All the necessary project related clearances such as environment, forest and
wildlife clearance from MOEF, Railways in respect of ROB/ RUBs, Irrigation
Page | 51
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Stages Description
Dept. and any other concerned agencies shall be obtained by the consultant. The
final approvals shall be obtained and submitted to CE (P) Sampark (BRO) so that
project implementation can straight away proceed without any hold up. For
utility clearances, consultant shall prepare draft utility shifting estimates using
the latest Schedule of Rates and obtain final approval from utility agency and CE
(P) Sampark (BRO).
Page | 52
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Details of properties, such as buildings and structures falling within the Right-of way and
costs of acquisition based on realistic rates.
Kilometer-wise Utility Relocation Plan (URP) and costs for relocation per civil construction
package as per concerned authorities.
Kilometer-wise account in regard to felling of trees of different type and girth and value
estimate of such trees based on realistic rates obtainable from concerned District forest
office.
Kilometer-wise Strip Plans for section (Package) shall be prepared separately for each
concerned agency and suggested by client.
3.6.4 Land Acquisition Report:
The Land acquisition report shall be prepared and submitted for section (package).
The report shall include detail schedules about acquisition of land holdings as per revenue records
and their locations in a strip plan and also the costs as per district authorities as per Performa
issued by client both in Hindi and English languages.
The land acquisition report should be prepared in consultation with affected persons, non-
governmental Organisations and concerned government agencies and should cover land acquisition
and resettlement plan and costs of resettlement and rehabilitation of such affected persons. It
should also include plan of compensating afforestation, its land requirement with specific locations
and cost involved for undertaking all activities in this regard.
3.6.5 Draft Detailed Project Report
Data Collection and Desk Study
All available reports/ documents and data relating to project road linkages and its influence area
will be collected and collated, leading to their classification and utilization in the following manner:
Information suitable for direct use in this project
Information relevant to the project but requiring verification and/or supplementation
Information serving as the basis for undertaking further surveys, investigations and
assessment.
The data and information required for the studies could be broadly classified as:
Type of Data Information to be collected
Topographic
Geographical map including category of road thereon;
Engineering
Engineering standards, design/as-built drawings, socio-economic and environmental data
from earlier relevant studies in the vicinity
Various types of systematic data (meteorological, hydraulic, hydrologic, geological,
environmental, land use, rehabilitation etc.)
Available gauge/discharge data of rivers, creeks and major streams at bridge sites falling
within the project influence area.
Data on geo-technical investigations at the major/minor bridge and high embankment sites
in the vicinity of the project influence area.
Page | 53
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Information about existing road inventories including data on pavement history and
condition, traffic statistics, and road accident statistics;
Data on construction materials including location of borrow areas, quarries within the
project influence area, and field test data on soils and materials as available from past
studies/activities, etc.
Traffic
All available traffic count data and projections;
Vehicle loading behavior.
Environmental assessment report including environmental management plan (EMP) and
Socio-Economic including resettlement action plan.
Economic data and socio-economic parameters in the project influence area.
Data pertaining to environmental parameters/aspects.
Cost estimate including BOQ and rate analysis.
Technical specification.
Good for construction drawings.
The requirement of information will be further reviewed and refined during the course of the
assignment. The consultant will also identify any other data / information necessary for preparation
of the designs and the necessary survey will be carried out to collect the same depending on the
type of data required. The methodology for data collation is described in the following paragraphs.
3.6.6 Final Detailed Project Report, Documents and Drawings
The Final package-wise DPR consisting of Main Report, Design Report, Drainage Design Report and
Materials Report, incorporating all revisions deemed relevant following receipt of the comments
from client on the draft DPR shall be submitted as per the schedule.
3.6.7 Technical Schedules
Bid document as per EPC will be submitted.
3.7 Methodology For Different Activities During DPR
The assignment has been divided in various activities as indicated in the Terms of Reference.
Several activities may starts simultaneously and few activities may run concurrently.
The activities described in the following paragraphs bring out the methodology, proposed to be
used during currency of the assignment. However, these may require modifications or adjustments
inter alia for addressing additional issues or conditions encountered during the provision of
services which may be suitably reviewed and discussed with the client and accordingly finalized.
3.7.1 Reconnaissance Survey
Consultant’s team of experts has made a rapid assessment of field conditions by reconnaissance
visit to Project Road to identify possible needs in terms of improvement. First-hand information will
be collected on road condition, traffic intensity, drainage and environmental and social aspects
which may need to be addressed while formulating different proposals at later stages of the project.
The reconnaissance survey is also aimed to facilitate formulation of detailed plan for conducting
various surveys and investigations required for the project, as also to facilitate preparation of a road
inventory for which more detailed inspection will be carried out at a later stage. The proforma of
collecting data is given in Annexure A to this report.
Page | 54
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Page | 55
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
requirements.
The proforma of collecting data is given in Annexure At o this report.
Page | 56
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
The axle load data should be collected axle configuration-wise. The number of equivalent standard
axles per truck shall be calculated on the basis of results obtained. The results of the survey should
bring out the VDF for each truck type (axle configuration, if the calculated VDF is found to be below
the national average, then national average shall be used. Furthermore, the data from axle load
surveys should be analysed to bring out the Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) and Single Axle Load (SAL)
Distributions by truck type (axle configuration).
The Consultant shall ascertain from local enquiries about the exceptional live loads that have used
the highway in the past in order to assess the suitability of existing bridges to carry such loads.
The proforma of collecting data is given in Annexure A to this report.
Speed-Delay Surveys
The Consultants shall carry out appropriate field studies such as moving car survey to determine
running speed and journey speed. The data should be analyzed to identify sections with typical
traffic flow problems and congestion. The objective of the survey would be to recommend suitable
measures for segregation of local traffic, smooth flow of through traffic and traffic safety. These
measures would include the provision of bypasses, under-passes, fly-overs, interchanges, grade-
separated intersections and service roads. The proforma of collecting data is given in Annexure A
to this report.
Pedestrian / animal cross traffic surveys
These may be conducted to determine if provision of viaduct for pedestrians/animals is necessary
to improve the traffic safety.
Truck Terminal Surveys
The data derived from the O-D, speed-delay, other surveys and also supplementary surveys should
be analysed to assess requirements for present and future development of truck terminals at
suitable locations en route.
Traffic Growth Survey
Traffic growth will depend on the following factors:
a. Annual population on real per capita growth rate.
b. Elasticity of transport demand to be known from registration of vehicle each year.
c. Traffic demand estimate shall be considered to open for traffic after 3 years.
d. Design period considered for 15 years.
3.7.6 Road Safety Audit
A comprehensive road safety audit will be undertaken along the project road to identify sensitive
areas, including black spots and also measures to be taken for integrating detailed engineering
design with road safety. The review will be made in accordance with IRC manual for safety in road
design and as per requirements of TOR. Special attention will be paid to road sections with poor
geometric standard, pedestrians movements and constrictions, town and village stretches and at all
junctions and cross road locations, visibility, hill road requirements, signs/ markings and lights etc.
during feasibility, preliminary designs and detailed designs.
Page | 57
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
extend to width as per requirements of IRC for the proposed project road on either side/ full ROW
width available in hilly terrain. The survey areas will be suitably increased in curves and cross road
for planning grade separators, if any. This survey will also be carried out along the bypass
alignments suggested in reconnaissance survey for bypassing the congested/Sharp Curve location
wherever applicable & necessary. In addition, the topographic surveys for Longitudinal and Cross-
Sections and details of utility services and other physical features will be carried out strictly in
accordance with TOR document.
data analysis, interpretation and the use of such data for pavement overlay design purposes using
IRC or any other widely used practices, such as AASHTO guidelines, shall be undertaken with the
approval of the competent authority.
3.7.11 Inventory & Conditions Survey for Road & Junctions
The condition of the Project Road will be visually inspected with a view to broadly classify the road
conditions and prepare a suitable road inventory. Preliminary reconnaissance survey will be
followed by road inventory surveys in order to capture the overall conditions of the road. The data
will be collected in sufficient detail and presented in tabular and graphical formats as per IRC: SP-
19- 2001.
3.7.12 Inventory and Condition Survey of Bridges and Cross-drainage Structures
1. The Consultants will inspect the existing structures of the road and shall prepare a report
about their condition including all the parameters given in the inspection pro-forma of IRC:
SP: 35-1990. The condition and structural assessment survey of the bridges / culverts /
structures shall be carried out by senior experts of the Consultants.
2. For the bridges identified to be in a distressed condition based upon the visual condition
survey, supplementary testing shall be carried out as per IRC: SP: 35-1990 and IRC: SP: 40-
1993. Selection of tests may be made based on the specific requirement of the structure.
3. The assessment of the load carrying capacity or rating of existing bridges shall be carried
out under one or more of the following scenarios:
When the design live load is less than that of the statutory commercial vehicle plying or
likely to ply on bridge;
If during the condition assessment survey and supplementary testing the bridge is found
to indicate distress of serious nature leading to doubt about structural and / or
functional adequacy, and
Design live load is not known nor are the records and drawings available
The client has to share the traffic live load data with the consultant in case if any heavy/
peculiar load of Army proposed to be passed to the bridge in future keeping in view the
requirements of the Army for movement of Tanks/ Guns or any other special
equipments to cater for the criteria in the bridge design.
4. The evaluation of the load carrying capacity of the bridge shall be carried out as per IRC: SP:
37-2010 (“Guidelines for Evaluation of Load Carrying Capacity of Bridges”). The analytical
and correlation method shall be used for the evaluation of the load carrying capacity as far
as possible. When it is not possible to determine the load carrying capacity of the bridge
using analytical and correlation method, the same shall be carried out using load testing.
The consultant has to exhaust all other methods of evaluation of strength of existing bridges
before recommending taking up load testing of bridges. Road closure for testing if
unavoidable shall be arranged by CE (P) Sampark (BRO) for limited duration say 12 hours
or so.
5. Necessary surveys and investigations to establish the remaining service life of each
retainable bridge or structure with and without the proposed strengthening and
rehabilitation according to acceptable international practice in this regard will be carried
out wherever required.
3.7.13 Preliminary Design of Road and Pavement
Page | 59
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Results of field investigations will be more appropriately used during the preparation of
preliminary designs during this study.
Alignment Selection
The existing road alignment and profile along with proposed improvements, preliminary design for
the road to be rehabilitated including intersections etc. will be followed. Redesigning the alignments
to ease sharp curves, to provide adequate sight distance etc. will be considered in design wherever
necessary. The cross-sectional elements like camber; super elevation etc. will also be improved as
per the requirement.
Based on the design standards evolved and finalized, preliminary designs of horizontal and vertical
alignment will be made using available softwares.
Pavement Design
Recommendations for the best suited pavement design will be made with specific suggestions for
type of pavement to be adopted such as rigid and flexible pavements. Further, the most appropriate
design option shall be proposed keeping in view the life cycle costing and techno-economic
considerations.
The design of the pavement will include;
- Design of new pavement
- Design of shoulders.
Requirements for widening existing road pavements will be determined on traffic capacity grounds
and in discussion with the client. Projection of future traffic growth will be made based on regional
economic and population growth as well as other site specific development proposal.
Based on the existing road alignment, profile and the terrain model developed from the
topographical survey, the detailed designs and drawings for the road works, design for culverts,
other drainage and protective works along with ancillary work will also be carried out.
The salient features of design would inter-alia include:
DesignSalient Features
• Geometric Design
• Horizontal alignment, longitudinal profile, cross-sectional elements including refuge lane at
every 2Km
• Design of intersections and junctions.
• Design of short bypasses/realignments, as required
• Widening of service roads, Pavement Design with various options
• Technological alternatives finalized.
• Final composition provided
• Finalize design of pavement for new alignment if any and overlays for existing road, in
accordance requirements of Client Drainage and Protection Works
• Produce standard designs and drawings for drainage works including integration with
village/municipal storm water drains in village / urban stretches and drainage design for
intersections
• Finalize design of stretches requiring roadside drains including drain size and shape and
location of turnout / outfall points
• finalize detailed design of protection measures for bridges and CD works
• Design drainage arrangement for wayside facilities etc.
Page | 60
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Page | 61
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Page | 62
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Sr.
Name of Person Position Task Assignment
No
KEY PERSONNEL
1 Anand Kumar Team Leader Planning, scheduling, coordinating and
Singh Cum Senior reporting
Highway Conduct Reconnaissance survey
Approve detailed designs
Approve all survey and investigation reports
Approve working drawings
Assess/ensure assessment of road
maintenance requirements
Approve pavement condition survey
Identify sections requiring pavement
rehabilitation
Approve detailed road inventory
Assess the adequacy of the drainage system
Ensure the development of an appropriate
traffic management scheme
Oversee the structuring of the project on
BOT / Private participation basis
Assess and approve the economic and
financial analysis recommendations
Active interaction with the Client
Oversee the environmental and social impact
assessment study
Approve the rehabilitation and resettlement
plan
Progress Monitoring
Preparation of project implementation
schedule / plan
Value Analysis and Value Engineering
Quality Assurance of services rendered by the
Consultant's team
Preparation of risk matrix and risk
Page | 63
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
management guidelines.
Sr. Design of Bridges
Name of Person Position Task Assignment
No
Design of Other Structures like Flyover/
Senior Bridge
2 R K Prajapati Underpass, Subways &structures including
Engineer
ROB'sif any
Preparation of working drawings
Preparation of kilometre wise alignment plan
& profiles
High embankment, pavement, road safety and
control features & drainage design
Design of traffic amenities
Design of various intersections and
interchanges
Highway cum
Evaluation of pavements
3 Ashok Mittal Pavement
Monitoring of Subgrade and Pavement
Engineer
Investigations
Identification of Failed sections and
Homogenous sections based on Pavement
Condition/ Subgrade Investigations
Overlay design based on BBD survey
Pavement Design
Suggestion of O&M Measures
Development System and procedures for Geo-
technical and Soil testing
Identification of construction material sources
Identification of quarry and borrow area
supervise all the laboratory and field tests
Preparation & testing of bituminous concrete
mixes
Material-cum-
4 Piyush kumar Undertake/Oversee Hydrological tests
Geo-technical
Undertake/oversee soil and sub soil
investigations
Ensure confirmation test procedures with
applicable specification and standards
Undertake/Oversee Pavement Investigations
Analysis of laboratory and field data
Preparation/approval of test reports.
5 Shailendra Sharma Senior Survey Checking of road alignment
Engineer Transferring benchmarks from established
Survey of India BMs
Establishing station using GPS
Traversing the Project road stretch
Page | 64
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Page | 65
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
going works
Sr. Preparation of Technical Specifications
Name of Person Position Task Assignment
No
SUPPORT STAFF
1 Surveyor Checking of benchmark and control pillars,
(2 nos) Collection of GTS details and Control of survey
data.
2 Asst. Material Assisting Material & Geo-technical Engineer
cum inconduction material surveys and geo–
Geotechnical technical surveys and calculation of soil
Engineer properties
(1 nos)
3 Asst. Highway Assisting the Team Leader & Highway Engineer
Engineer in selection of alternatives, conducting various
(2 nos) surveys and investigations.
4 Environmental Assisting the environmental specialist in
Engineer environmental screening, impact studies, data
(2 nos) collection and environmental Clearance
process for the project roads.
5 Social Specialist Preparation Social Screening impact studies,
(2 nos) FMB,Village Maps and other data collection and
assisting f or LPS.
6 MX Engineer Checking the topographic survey coordinates,
(2 nos) preparing the triangulation and contour
drawings. Preparation of design templates and
input files for the preliminary and detailed
design.
7 Asst. Bridge Design and preparationofdetaileddrawings
Engineer forBridges,andotherstructureslikeCDs’,
(2nos) viaductsetc.
8 CAD Draftsman PreparationofDrawings,stripmaps,GADfor
(4 nos) structures,Typicalcross-section,Alignment
plansetc.
9 Asst.TrafficEngi Assistingthe Traffic Engineer, conductinga
neer trafficsurveysand Analysis.
(1 nos)
10 Quantity Assistingtheseniorquantitysurveyorincost
Surveyors estimates,preparationofBOQandtechnical
(2 nos) specification.
11 Hydrological Collectionofhydrologicaldataforexisting
Page | 66
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Consultancy services from MORT&H empaneled firm for feasibility study (FS),
Preparation of detailed project report (DPR) and preconstruction services for
improvement of road Rafiabad-Kupwara-Chowkibal-Tangdhar-Chamkot (NH-
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION 701) for further development as NHDL specification with paved shoulder as
well as district connectivity road in 109 RCC under 32 BRTF project Beacon in
state of Jammu & Kashmir .
Engineer structures,calculatingthedischargecapacity
Sr. fornewstructures.
Name of Person Position Task Assignment
No
12 ComputerOper Entering the surveydata intoexcelsheet,
ator printing thedocumentsand reports.
Page | 67
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Sl. Descriptio
Design code
No n
(i) IRC :38:1988 Guidelines for design of horizontal curves
(ii) IRC :SP-23:1993- Vertical curves for Highways
(iii) IRC:52:2001-Standards for road rail level crossings
IRC:54:1974-Lateral &vertical clearances at underpasses for
(iv)
vehicular traffic
(v) IRC:64: 1990-Capacity of road in rural areas
Geometric (vi) IRC:66:1976- Sight distance on Rural Highways
1 Design IRC :73:1980 Geometric design standard for Rural (Non-
standard (vii)
urban )Highway
(viii IRC: SP 73- 2015 Manual of specification & standard for 2-laning of
) highway with paved shoulder
(ix) IRC: SP 48-1998 Manual for hill road
(x) IRC :75:2015-Guidelines for design of Highway Embankment
(xi) IRC :86:1983- Geometric design standard for urban road in plains
(xii) IRC: 106:1990- Guidelines on capacity of urban road in plain areas
(i) IRC :37-2012 Guidelines for design of Flexible Pavement
Design of
2 (ii) IRC :58-2015-Guidelines for Design of Rigid Pavement
pavement
(iii) IRC:81-1997-Guidelines for strengthening of flexible pavement
(i) IRC:65-2017 Traffic Rotaries
Junction (ii) IRC:92-2017-Guidelines for Design of interchanges
/intersecti IRC:93-1985-Guidelines on Design &Installation of Road traffic
3 (iii)
on/interch signals
anges Design of junctions based on type design of Intersection on NH
(iv)
published by MORT&H- 1995
4 Kilometre (i) IRC:81-1997-Type of design for Highway kilometres stones
Page | 68
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Sl. Descriptio
Design code
No n
stones (ii) IRC:26:1967-Type design for 200 m stones
200m
stones and
boundary (iii) IRC:25:1967- Type design for boundary stones
pillar
(i) IRC:31:1969-Route marker signs for state routes
Traffic (ii) IRC:67:2001- Code of practice for road signs
5
signs (iii) IRC:79:1981-Recommended practice for Road traffic signs
(iv) IRC: SP:31: 1992-Road Traffic sign
Road
6 (i) IRC :35:2015-Code of Practice for Road marking, road delineators
Marking
IRC: SP: 13-2004- Guidelines for design of small bridge and culvert
(i) Standard design of CD work and small bridge based on MORT&H
has been considered.
Design of IRC: 5-2015 Standard specifications and code of practice for road
culverts (ii)
7 bridges, section 1- General features of design (8threvision)
and small
bridges IRC: 6- 2017 Standard specifications for road bridges (load and
(iii)
load combinations)
IRC: 78-2014 Standard specifications and code of practice for road
(iv)
bridges (foundations and sub-structure)
Page | 69
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
(iv) The geometric design is subject to available right of way (ROW) and shall conform to the
standards, set out as minimum, as far as possible;
(v) The uniformity of design standards is maintained throughout the length of the Project
road, as far as possible;
(vi) Wherever the existing road geometrics are deficient, due importance to improvement of
these sections will be provided;
(vii) Existing horizontal curves, which are found deficient in radius need to be corrected to
meet the design requirement subject to ROW constraints;
(viii) Any deficiencies in the vertical profile in respect of grades layout and sight distance shall
need to be corrected to meet the minimum standard requirements;
(ix) Design of road side appurtenances shall be in accordance with relevant codes of IRC,
BIS, or other international standards and should meet minimum requirements set forth
in the MORT&H Specifications for Road and Bridge Works;
(x) The design of cross drainage works shall be in accordance with the relevant IRC Codes.
The road alignment design shall take into account the location of the cross drainage (CD)
works, bridges and other structures. In case of major bridges (above 60 m), the design
alignment shall give precedence to the bridge location.
5.4 Preliminary Design
At the preliminary stages, geometric designs will be limited to identifying locations where flattering
of slopes and horizontal curves are required and are feasible. For such cases, layout designs
showing the extend of new construction and additional land to be acquired willbe prepared.
Similarly, geometric designs will be prepared at locations of underpasses and grade-separation, if
any, and locations where service roads would be required. Moreover, recommendations will be
made by HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT in case of need for improvement of horizontal
and/or vertical alignment.
The preliminary design of road will be done based on the road improvement plan and the Digital
Terrain Model, prepared from the topographic survey data, using most commonly used Computer
Aided Design, such as AutoDesk Land Development Desktop (LDD) or INROAD. The Flow of design
process of the road using CAD is briefly described in Fig. 5.1 that HIGHWAY ENGINEERING
CONSULTANT intends to use in the Project.
The horizontal alignment and longitudinal profiles will be designed based on the design standards
established and approved by the Client. The ‘templates’ will be created in CAD to design the cross
sections, accommodating the stretches requiring 2/4-lanes, as defined in the road improvement
plan. Cross sections will be automatically generated and the quantities will also be calculated
accordingly.
5.5 Detailed Design
5.6 Horizontal Alignment
The horizontal alignment shall be straight as far as practicable. However the straight stretch shall
not be more than 1500 m to avoid the effect of monotony and induction of an unconscious increase
in speed. Similarly, last few metres of the tunnel shall have gentle curve. The curves if provided shall
be gentle and meet the minimum radius requirements for design speed of the tunnel. Tunnel
alignment at the ends and open/approach cuts shall merge smoothly with adjoining road in the
open air. The crossing of central median, wherever applicable shall be provided at suitable locations
at approaches of both tunnel tubes so as to allow emergency services gain immediate access to
either tube and also to send back diverted traffic to proper traffic lanes.
As per the requirements of IRC: SP 73:2015 the following guidelines were followed during the
design:
Uniformity of design standards;
Horizontal alignment should be fluent and blend well with the surrounding topography;
Limit the damage to the existing environment including preservation of natural crops and
plant growth and conservation of existing features
The horizontal alignment should be designed in consideration of the longitudinal profile and
vice versa; and
Location of bridges and their approaches are to be properly co-ordinate keeping in view the
overall technical feasibility, economy, fluency in alignment and aesthetics.
The geometric design shall also be undertaken so as to minimize impact on trees, utilities, houses,
shops and avoid extending beyond the existing right of way (ROW).
5.6.1 Horizontal Curves
Page | 71
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
The radius of horizontal curves for various terrain conditions shall not be less than the desirable
values given in Table 5.2except for sections as indicated in Schedule ‘D’. For such sections radius
shall not be less than the absolute minimum.
Table 5.3:Minimum Radii of Horizontal Curves (in meters)
Plain Terrain Rolling Terrain Hilly Terrain
Ruling Minimum Absolute Ruling Absolute Absolute Ruling
Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimu Minimum
m
360 230 230 155 20
Based on above methodology, the horizontal alignment has been designed using MX Road software.
Radius at Which Camber is not required
Radius for which Camber is not required is given below in Table 5.4:
Table 5.4: Radius at Which Camber is not required
Design Speed (Km/h)
40 50 65 80 100
Radius for camber of 3 % 240 370 620 950 1500
(metres)
These are indicative design speeds. Due to constraints in ROW, large scale easing of sub-standard
curves is not feasible. Wherever, improvement of curves from design speed considerations is not
possible, speed limitation shall need to be resorted to.
5.6.2 Transition Curves
Minimum length of transition curve shall be determined from the following two considerations and
the larger of the two values adopted for design:
i) The rate of change of centrifugal acceleration should not cause discomfort to drivers. From
this consideration, the length of transition curve is given by:
Ls = 0.0215 V3/CR,
Page | 72
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Where,
Ls = Length of transition curve in metres,
V = Speed in km/hr,
R = Radius of circular curve in metres,
C = 80/ (75+V) (subject to a maximum of 0.8 and minimum of 0.5)
ii) The rate of change of super elevation should be such as not to cause discomfort to
travelers. Further, rate of change should not be steeper than 1 in 150 for roads in
plain/rolling terrain, and 1 in 60 in mountainous/steep terrain. The formula for minimum
length of transition on this basis is:
Ls = 2.7V2/R
5.6.3 Sight Distance
Visibility is an important requirement for the safety of travel on roads. For this, it is necessary that
sight distance of adequate length is available in different situations, to permit drivers enough time
and distance to control their vehicles so that chances of accidents are minimized.
On two-lane roads, normally intermediate sight distance should be available throughout. The
attempt should, however, be to provide overtaking sight distance in as much length of the road as
possible. In stretches where even intermediate sight distance is not available, the safe stopping sight
distance should be provided as a last resort. Such sections shall be specified in Schedule ‘B’. Traffic
signs depicting "Overtaking Prohibited:" shall be installed at all such locations.
The recommended sight distances for various speeds are given in Table 5.5
Table 5.5: Sight Distances for Various Speeds
Speed (km/hr) Stopping Sight Intermediate Sight Overtaking Sight
Distance (m) Distance (m) Distance (m)
100 180 360 640
80 120 240 470
60 90 180 340
40 45 90 165
The requisite sight distance shall be available across the inner side of horizontal curves.
Where horizontal and summitcurves overlap, the design shall provide for the required sight
distance, both in the vertical direction, along the pavement and in the horizontal direction on the
inner side of curve.
6.6.4 Design Speed
The design speeds given in Table 5.6 shall be adopted for various terrain classifications (Terrain is
classified by the general slope of the ground across the highway alignment).
Table 5.6: Design Speed
Nature of Terrain Cross Slope of the Ground Design Speed (km/h)
Ruling Minimum
Page | 73
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Short stretches (say less than 1 km) of varying terrain met with on the road stretch shall not be
taken into consideration while deciding the terrain classification for a given section of Project
Highway.
In general, the ruling design speed shall be adopted for the various geometric design features of the
road. Minimum design speed shall be adopted only where site conditions are restrictive and
adequate land width is not available. Such stretches where design speed other than ruling speed is
to be adopted shall be as indicated as deviation in Schedule 'D' of the Concession Agreement.
5.7 Vertical Alignment
The vertical alignment should provide for a smooth longitudinal profile. Grade changes should not
be too frequent as to cause kinks and visual discontinuities in the profile.
Ruling gradients shall be adopted as far as possible. Limiting gradients shall be adopted in difficult
situations and for short length.
The ruling and limiting gradients are given in Table 5.7
Table 5.7: Gradients
Nature of Terrain Ruling Gradient Limiting Gradient
Plain and rolling 2.5% 3.3 %
Mountainous 5.0% 6.0 %
Steep 6.0% 7.0 %
Long sweeping vertical curves shall be provided at all grade changes. These shall be designed as
square parabolas.
Design of vertical curves and its co-ordination with horizontal curves shall be in accordance with
IRC: SP: 23.
5.7.1 Vertical Curves
Long sweeping vertical curves shall be provided at all grade changes. These shall be designed as
square parabolas.
Design of vertical curves and its co-ordination with horizontal curves shall be in accordance with
IRC: SP: 23 and given in Table 5.8 below:
Table 5.8: Minimum Length of Vertical Curves
Maximum grade change (per cent) Minimum length of vertical
Design Speed (Km/h)
not requiring a vertical curve curve (meters)
Up to 35 1.5 15
40 1.2 20
50 1.0 30
65 0.8 40
Page | 74
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
80 0.6 50
100 0.5 60
Length of summit curves is governed by the choice of sight distance. Length of the valley curves
should be such that for night travel, the head light beam distance is equal to the stopping sight
distance. The lengths of the valley curves are worked out as per the guidelines and formula given in
the IRC: 73-1980.
5.7.2 Summit curves
The length of summit curve is governed by the choice of sight distance. The length of summit curve
shall be calculated based on following formulae:
For safe stopping sight distance
Case (i) L>S
NS2
L= -------
4.4
Case (ii) L<S
4.4
L = 2S - -------
N
Where,
L = length of the Summit curve (m)
S = required sight distance (m)
N = algebraic difference between the grades.
NS2
L= ----------
1.50 + 0.35S
1.50 + 0.035S
L = 2S - --------------------
N
Page | 75
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Where,
L = length of the Summit curve (m)
S = required sight distance (m)
N = algebraic difference between the grades
Page | 76
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Page | 77
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Table 5.13: Width of Shoulders in Mountainous and Steep Terrain (Hilly Area)
Type of Section Hill / Width of Shoulder (m) *
Valley Side
Paved Earthen Total
Hill Side 1.5 m - 1.5 m
Open country with isolated built up area
Valley Side 1.5 m 1.0 m 2.5 m
0.25 m + 1.5 m
Hill Side - 1.75 m
Built up area and approaches to grade (Raised)
separated structures/ bridges 0.25 m + 1.5 m
Valley side - 1.75 m
(Raised)
* Exclusive of parapet son valley side and side drains on hill side
Notes:
i) In case retaining wall with parapet is provided on valley side, the earthen shoulder may not
be provided.
ii) Width of paved shoulders in approaches to grade separated structures as indicated in Table
2.2 and 2.3 above shall extend on either side of the structure in the entire length of
retaining/RE wall. The retaining/RE wall on either side shall be abutting the paved
shoulders and shall have crash barriers on top.
iii) In built up areawhere two lanehighway is provided and extra right of way is available, the
space between the paved shoulder and foot path cum drains on both sides shall be covered
with paver block flooring. Similarly in 4-lane sections the space between carriageway and
footpath cum drains on both sides shall be covered with paver block flooring,
5.9.5 Camber/Cross fall
Following camber/cross slope have been adopted in the design, considering the IRC guidelines.
The cross fall on straight sections of road carriageway, paved shoulders and paved portion of
median shall be 2.5 percent for bituminous surface and 2.0 percent for cement concrete surface.
The cross fall for earthen shoulders on straight portions shall be at least 0.5 percent steeper than
the slope of the pavement and paved shoulder subject to a minimum of 3.0 percent. On super
elevated sections, the earthen portion of the shoulder on the outer side of the curve shall be
provided with reverse cross fall of 0.5 percent so that the earth does not drain on the carriageway
and the storm water drains out with minimum travel path.
The two-lane roads shall be provided with a crown in the middle. On horizontal curves, the
carriageway shall be super elevated. The details of cross slope is given below in Table 5.14 below
Table 5.14: Details of Cross Slope
Sl.No Type of Surface Recommended Cross Slope
1 Bituminous Surface 2.5%
2 Earthen Shoulders 3.0%
Page | 78
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Step 2: Axle load surveys will be conducted on the corridor and VDF for different categories of
vehicle established. Design traffic loading for pavement design will be estimated from VDF and
projected traffic figures. Axle load spectrum for the rigid pavement design will also be
established.
Page | 79
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Step 3: Detailed material investigations will be conducted in the projected influence area and
strength characteristics and availability of borrow area material will be determined.
Step 4: Design thickness of overlay will be estimated from IRC-81-1997 using estimated traffic level
and characteristic deflection of particular homogeneous section. Estimated BM thickness is then
adjusted to equivalent thickness of AC & DBM using conversion factors given in IRC 81-
1997.tep 5: Homogeneous sections for pavement design will be established and design traffic
loadings for each of them will be identified. Design of flexible pavement for widening portion will be
carried out in accordance with guidelines of IRC-37-2012.
Step 6: Design of rigid pavement will be carried out in accordance with IRC: 58 – 2011 guidelines.
Step 7: Design of flexible pavement for paved shoulders, service roads, and interchange ramps will
be carried out in accordance with IRC 37-2012 guidelines.
The above methodology is presented in the form of a flow chart in Figure 5.6 below
Page | 80
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Page | 81
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT will prepare General Arrangement Drawings (GAD) and
alignment plan showing salient features of the structures proposed to be constructed/re-
constructed/rehabilitated along the project road and identify cost effective improvement options
for the existing CD structures.
Identify new locations for placement of bridges, culverts, grade separators, underpasses and
overpasses to ensure maximum connectivity. Any requirements for providing new bridges or other
major structures will be agreed with TNRSP prior to commencement of the design.
The GAD for new culverts will be supplemented by detailed designs to enable employer to approve
the location and length of CD structure. All the existing cut stone culvert and pipe culvert less than
0.9m diameter are proposed to be reconstructed as Box culvert.
Subsequent to approval of the GAD and alignment plan by the Employer HIGHWAY ENGINEERING
CONSULTANT will prepare detailed designs and working drawings for all the components of the
Cross Drainage and structures. HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT will furnish the design and
working drawings for suitable protection works and/or river training works wherever required.
The designs will be carried out and prescribed in detail with cross references, supporting data,
detailed geotechnical data, sketches and input/output data in case of analysis through a structural
analysis packages.
Dismantling of existing structures will be avoided as far as possible except where considered
essential in view of their poor structural conditions/inadequate provisions etc. The inadequate
carriageway width will be widened/reconstructed in part or full to 12m as per the latest Ministry
guidelines.
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT will carry out the design and make suitable
recommendations for protection works and/or river draining works for proposed/existing bridges
and drainage structures.
5.15 Design of Drainage System
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT will work out the requirement of longitudinal drainage
system and integration of the same with the proposed cross drainage system for the entire length of
the project road. The drainage design will also include integration with village / municipal storm
water drainage in village/ urban stretches and drainage design for the intersections. Wherever
feasible, a rain harvesting system for outfalls will also be designed.
The designed drainage system will show locations of turnout/ outfall points with details of outfall
structures fitting into the natural contours. Provision will also be made for continuing longitudinal
drains through the cross road junctions. Special drainage provision for road sections passing
through cuts and section with super-elevated carriageways will be made. Adequate drainage
provisions will be worked out for road segments passing through urban areas. During the site visits,
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT noticed the necessity of good drainage system along the
urbanized areas, where the pavement is badly damaged mainly due to poor drainage system.
Prior to commencing the drainage design HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT will carry out a
thorough survey of existing structures on the route and make an inventory of them, recording their
dimensions, condition and functional adequacy, in accordance with IRC-SP: 35. This survey will
identify those facilities requiring extension or rehabilitation, and those, which are simply
inadequate for the run-off experienced. HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT will check existing
drainage systems for signs of deficiencies and design any necessary remedial works. If necessary,
Page | 82
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT will prepare a drainage design for the road covering river
and stream crossings, minor drainage channels, side ditches, and all other drainage requirements.
As part of hydrological studies, HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT will check existing ground
levels and catchments, streambeds and cross drainage channels above and below the road for
possible erosion effects; design and quantify any necessary protective works. In addition, he will
examine the existing side drainage; specify, design and quantify new side drainage and lined drains
where necessary to eliminate scour and erosion or to provide support for narrow road cross
sections.
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT will calculate storm run-off for each catchment area and
stream crossing and will check his calculations with observations of actual flood levels in the field
(this will also require interview with people along the roads). The Rational method will be used for
calculating storm run-off for catchments of up to 2.5 km². For larger catchments HIGHWAY
ENGINEERING CONSULTANT will consider the use of the Snyder Method. For rivers with regular
measuring stations, observed flood data will be used.
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT is aware of the importance of good drainage design and the
need to provide drainage protection works in places prone to flooding. If found necessary,
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT will prepare standard designs for Bridges, Pipe culverts,
Box culverts, Culvert headwalls, Culvert inlet and outlet structures, Lined drains, Cut-off drains and
Cascades.
Depending upon the availability of land covered/lined drain will be proposed in urban/town limit,
open drain in semi urban/ village areas and unlined drains in rural section.
A signalized intersection besides other warrants is justified, if the major street has a traffic volume
of 650 to 800 vehicles per hour (both directions) and minor street has 200 to 250 vehicles per hour
in one direction only. The detailed warrants for signalized intersection are laid down as per IRC: 93-
1985.
The standards proposed in IRC SP: 41-1994 “Guidelines for the Design of At-Grade Intersection in
Rural and Urban Areas” is applied for at-grade junction improvements. Each junction on the project
Page | 83
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
road is carefully designed with due regard to physical conditions of the site, extent and cost of
land, cost of construction and the effect of proposal on the neighbourhood. Allowances made
for space needed for traffic signs, lighting columns, drainage, public utilities etc. A curve radius of
15 to 30 m adopted depending on site conditions. To ensure large vehicles turn right / left without
difficulty on to or from a major road, a radius of 15-20 m control circles tangential both to the
Centre line of the major road and the side of the central verge away from the minor road used. A
minimum width of 5.5m is provided for turning lanes at the intersections.
5.17 Design of Traffic Safety Features, Road Furniture and Road Markings
While conducting the detailed engineering, HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT will conduct
traffic safety audit for all the project roads in formats in consultation with the Employer.
After traffic safety audit the vulnerable points will be selected on least safety wise order. On arriving
at the order of priority the following aspects will be provided:
The recommendation from the road safety will be integrated in the engineering design in the form
of improved intersection layout, traffic segregation arrangement for slow moving vehicles,
pedestrian facilities, improved road geometrics and installation of traffic signs, road delineators,
reflectorized marker pots and other traffic calming and road safety measures. Pavement marking
and sign layout plans will be prepared for safe and efficient traffic movement. Both will be based on
current international practice for roads of this type, adjusted through discussion with the TNRSP to
suit Indian conditions. Roadway lighting designs for sections through urban areas and other areas
where lighting is required will be prepared. Lighting design will be based on a recognized
international standard. The locations of these features will be given in the reports and also shown in
the drawings.
HIGHWAY ENGINEERING CONSULTANT will take into consideration the following few points for
providing the traffic safety amenities.
a) Bus Bays on either side of road with adequate space for negotiating the vehicle from the
main track; designing the Bus bay section to withstand the wear and tear due to stoppage
and pulling of vehicles. If required provision for retaining walls may be made.
b) Truck lay Bays: These provisions are to be made away from the inhabited area, this item
requires enough space for parking of trucks carrying the agricultural produce, market
Page | 84
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
commodities etc. The possibility of allotting adequate space may be considered (without
going for Land Acquisition).
c) Petrol Pumps: The possibility of erecting petrol pumps and the existing facility to provide
access to petrol pumps, nature of existing geometrics etc.
d) Rest areas for truck drivers: A detailed schedule for this item is required in the lines of
National Highways where already this provision is made. This item requires the LA schedule
(extent of land required for each rest area etc.)
Recommendations from road safety review will be integrated in the engineering design in the form
of improved intersection layout, traffic segregation arrangement for slow moving vehicles,
pedestrian facilities, improved road geometrics and installation of traffic signs, road delineators,
reflectorized marker pots and other traffic calming and road safety measure.
Pavement marking and sign layout plans will be prepared for safe and efficient traffic movement.
Both are to be based on current international practice for roads of this type, adjusted through
discussion with the TNRSP II/HD to suit Indian conditions.
Roadway lighting designs for sections through urban areas and other areas where lighting is
required will be prepared. Lighting design is to be based on a recognized international standard.
All activities related to field studies, design and documentation will be done as per the latest
guidelines / circulars of MORTH and relevant publications / codes of Indian Road Congress (IRC)
and Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). For aspects not covered by IRC and BIS, international
standard practices, such as, Australian, British and American Standards may be adopted. All
notations used in the reports, documents and drawings will be as per IRC: 71- 1977.
Page | 85
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Projection of future economic growth will take into account the past performance, both of the
national economy as well as the regional/PIA economy as also future economic development plans.
Three scenarios of future economic growth, namely, optimistic, pessimistic and the most likely will
be considered for analysis. For this purpose, secondary data will be collected from the State
government’s Department of Economics and Statistics, State Planning Department, Census of India,
Central Statistical Organisation and through internet browsing. Documents like the 12th Five Year
Plan, Vision 2023 for the state, Economic Survey, State Statistical Abstract etc. will be studied.
In dealing with macro-economic indicators, trends in NSDP over a period of time, at current as well
as at constant prices, will be analyzed. The sectoral composition of NSDP will be studied and
structural changes, if any, brought out. Average annual growth rates (at constant prices) will be
worked out for the economy as a whole as well as for various economic sectors.
Future transport demand elasticities will be estimated for the analysis period keeping in view the
future vehicle mix and past elasticity values.
Projected vehicular growth rates would be estimated based on the projected transport
demand elasticities and projected growth rates of the socio-economic parameters for the
corresponding period. Traffic growth rates by vehicle type under the three scenarios will be
determined for a period of 20 years from completion of up-gradation, at five-yearly intervals. The
growth rate projected by vehicle type under three scenarios would then be applied to the base year
traffic. The future traffic, in terms of number of vehicles, will be projected in each successive year
upto the horizon year of the study. However, the viability analysis will be carried out using the
traffic growth rates of the most likely scenario.
Economic analysis will be carried out using HDM-4 model. The main inputs for HDM relate to
existing as well as proposed road and pavement characteristics, traffic volume and its composition,
traffic growth rate, vehicle characteristics, pavement construction and maintenance policies. In
addition, economic prices for vehicles, tyres and tubes, fuel, maintenance labour and crew are to be
used.
Economic costs reflect the resource cost to the economy and are derived from financial costs after
removing taxes and transfer payments. Economic costs will be derived from financial costs of
construction and maintenance using a conversion factor as appropriate (presently considered as 0.9
for road projects in India).
The annual stream of costs, divided into major components of construction/improvement, and
maintenance, will be developed for the analysis period. The direct economic benefits that accrue by
improvement of the road include savings in Vehicle Operating Costs (VOC) and travel time costs for
passengers and goods in transit. In addition, road improvement results in reduced maintenance
costs as well as reduced congestion and accident costs. For economic viability analysis, direct
benefits would be estimated comparing costs for “with” and “without project” situations and annual
stream of benefits computed over the analysis period. Subject to the availability of data related to
accidents (by cause) and type of damage along the road section, HIGHWAY ENGINEERING
Page | 86
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
CONSULTANT will estimate the benefits due to savings in accident costs resulting from reduced
incidence of road accidents. The values assigned to accident, by type, as given in IRC-SP30 for
“Manual on Economic Evaluation of Highway Projects in India” will be used and updated to base
price levels for analysis.
The main objective of Financial Analysis is to examine the viability of the project on EPC basis. The
analysis attempts to ascertain the extent to which the investment can be recovered through
different sources of revenue.
Page | 87
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Page | 88
Highway Engineering Consultant
Draft Inception Report
Preparation of Feasibility Study (FS), Detailed Project Report (DPR) on EPC Mode for
Improvement of Road Rajouri-Thanamandi-Surankot from Km 3.900 to Km 56.915
(Net Length 53.015 Km) Under 31 BRTF Area Under Project Sampark In J&K State.
BORDER ROADS ORGANISATION
Page | 89
Highway Engineering Consultant