Creativity Ted Talks-Les
Creativity Ted Talks-Les
Creativity Ted Talks-Les
The argument of if schools foster or kill creativity is one for the ages. View these TedTalks from
both sides of the spectrum and answer the questions below. Expand thoughtfully in all of your
answers!
Before Watching
2. Do you consider yourself a creative person? What has your experience been in school
with creativity?
I would consider myself a creative person. Whenever we are asked to write or draw something,
or whenever there is a need for ideas, I always think of something or another. Especially when
it involves writing or drawing, because I love to do both and always have ideas that I want to
write/draw about.
While Watching
Take lots of notes for each video and identify the claim, purpose, and evidence of each!
Claim: Schools educate creativity out of kids. Claim: Schools are equipping kids with
knowledge to be creative; creativity is based
on knowledge.
Purpose: To ask the people who are running Purpose: To defend that schools help kids be
the education system and society in general more creative by giving them knowledge to
to teach kids holistically, and foster creativity base their creativity on.
rather than continue the way it is; to reform
the education system
Evidence: Every education system has the Evidence: The person who thought through
same hierarchy of subjects. Education only crop rotation allowed people to do other
focuses on the minds rather than the whole things and invent while being fed. The
body. Our education system is predicated on invention of steam power allowed so many
the needs for industrial professions and other inventions to be made, and is creative
academic ability. Most people are graduating thinking based on knowledge. Even arts are
now, so degrees are starting to not matter based on knowledge. Knowledge allows you
anymore. The most useful subjects are at the to better understand the world and things
top. The things kids are good at are you want to pursue. Knowledge is important
stigmatized at school, so many kids think they to be a good citizen and person.
aren’t intelligent. Academic inflation is
happening. Intelligence is diverse.
Intelligence is dynamic. Intelligence is
distinct.
After Watching
1. Does how we define “creativity” matter? Do Robinson and Leunig have the same
definition? Explain.
The way we define creativity encourages us to put importance on subjects/ways to foster it.
The way we define it leads to the ways we maintain it. Both speakers have the same definition
of creativity, that it arises from different ways that we experience and view the world. They
both agree that schools focus on the minds. Just what importance that focus is is different.
2. Do schools kill or foster creativity? With which speaker do you agree/disagree? Explain.
I think schools give a foundation for creativity, by giving you knowledge in order to be creative.
But it is true that many times that school’s structure limits the amount of creativity happening
in the classroom. However, I don’t think that it completely squashes creativity, so I would have
to agree with Leunig. The reason is that I love school, and the knowledge I learn from it inspires
my creativity, as well as helps give me more inspiration. I don’t need school to help cultivate my
creativity actively, and already does.
3. Can creativity be taught? If so, how? What responsibility do schools have in the
endeavor?
Creativity itself can’t be taught, but the ability to cultivate creativity, and understand how to
think creativity can be taught. Schools give you the foundation and specific tools path to pursue
creativity, more so than just life in general. The way you look at the world and decipher it is
greatly enhanced by school, and affects creativity.