Data Centre

DATA
CENTERS
A holistic view of the data center
and the opportunities to enhance
its infrastructure to meet current
and future demands
Chapter 1
Data center standards
Chapter 1
Data center
standards
Setting the standards for higher speeds

Data centers and their contents must adhere to a wide range of standards, ranging from local building codes to
guidelines from the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Experts (ASHRAE) on cooling to
a number of requirements placed on the IT equipment. There are also a number of standards related to the structured
cabling infrastructure that serves as the platform for IT equipment in the data center.
CommScope monitors data center trends and

participates in standards organizations to help data
center operators stay ahead of the industry. Given
the relentless growth in data traffic and the need to
provide high-bandwidth, low-latency connections,
there has been a tremendous amount of activity within
the standards bodies to define higher speeds. It is
important to keep up with the latest developments
to ensure the cabling infrastructure can support these
higher speeds with minimal disruption.
Server to Switch Connectivity
www.commscope.com 2
1 | Data center standards
How the standards define data center cabling

There are two main types of standards relevant to data center cabling infrastructure:
Application Standards Cabling Standards

Applications standards define the application that will run on the Cabling standards provide more detail around the physical media
cabling infrastructure. There are three applications standards that and define the channel that supports the applications. There are
are the most commonly deployed in data centers. three main cabling standard bodies.
(Ethernet standards) have been particularly TIA® CENELEC ISO/IEC

IEE 802.3 active, and currently have draft standards
underway for applications up to 400 Gb/s. North America Europe Global
Each of these groups has a general standard which defines structured

(Fibre Channel) covers storage area networks cabling, as well as a standard specifically for data center applications
INCITS T11 (SANs), with published standards for up to 128 to reflect the need for higher speeds, increased density and an array
Gb/s with a roadmap out to 1 Tb/s. of architectures. While there are differences between these standards,
there is agreement around the minimum recommended cabling
categories and connector types.
Infiniband Trade Association is used primarily
Infiniband™ for high-performance computing applications, TIA® CENELEC ISO/IEC
with a roadmap with options for up to 600 Gb/s. Data center TIA-942-B EN 50173-5 ISO-IEC 11801-5
standard
Fiber OM4 OM3 OM3
Applications standards also define the distance that an application OS1a OS2 OS2
can operate over a given media type. For example, under IEEE Connectors LC (≤ 2 fibers)
802.3an, 10GBASE-T can operate at up to 100 meters over MPO (≥ 2 fibers)
Category 6A cabling.
In addition to EN50173-5, CENELEC has also developed the EN 50600-2-4 standard
“Telecommunication Cabling Infrastructure”. It focuses primarily on design requirements for
the different DC availability classes with strong emphasis on migration and growth.
www.commscope.com 3
1 | Data center standards RESOURCES
Keep up with the standards

to future-proof the data center
White Paper
Data Center Application Standards
Reference Guide - Networking and Storage
Standards updates
CommScope Quarterly Standards Advisor
White Paper
Data Center Cabling Design Fundamentals:
Telecommunication Cabling
Infrastructure Requirements
Since data center cabling infrastructure

will likely need to support multiple generations
of equipment and speeds in the future, keeping
up with the latest standards developments is critical.
For new builds, it is important to deploy the highest
bandwidth cabling as per the data center cabling standards.
www.commscope.com 4
Return back to full
Data Center eBook
CommScope pushes the boundaries of communications

technology with game-changing ideas and ground-breaking
discoveries that spark profound human achievement.
We collaborate with our customers and partners to design,
create and build the world’s most advanced networks. It is our
passion and commitment to identify the next opportunity and
realize a better tomorrow.
Discover more at commscope.com
For more information
on enhancing your data
center, reach out to one
of our experts now.
www.commscope.com
Visit our website or contact your local CommScope representative for more information.
© 2018 CommScope, Inc. All rights reserved.
All trademarks identified by ® or ™ are registered trademarks or trademarks, respectively, of CommScope, Inc.
This document is for planning purposes only and is not intended to modify or supplement any specifications or warranties relating to CommScope
products or services.
CO-110101.3-EN (08/18) CHAPTER 1
DATA
CENTERS
and future demands
Chapter 2
Multi tenant data centers
Chapter 2
Multi tenant
data centers
Freeing enterprises to focus

on their core business
With more than 130 million square feet of white space, multi
tenant data centers (MTDCs) are one of the fastest-growing
segments in the data center industry. Expanding at a rate of
16 percent annually, MTDCs enable enterprises and service
providers to outsource their data center facilities. By leasing
third-party data center whitespace, enterprises can remain
focused on their core business while enjoying optimal data
center availability, reliability and cost control.
As a leading provider of multi tenant data center infrastructure solutions, CommScope has
developed considerable expertise in this space, helping both operators and tenants maximize the
value of these flexible, cost-effective facilities.
www.commscope.com 2
2 | Multi tenant data centers
KEY ADVANTAGES
Flexibility
Multi tenant data center infrastructure makes advanced technology such as cloud computing and virtualized data
centers available to small- and mid-sized businesses while also allowing easy expandability as the business grows.
Reliability
Multi tenant data centers provide their own technicians to maintain the infrastucture and ensure that hosted
functions operate at peak efficiency at all times. Multi tenant data center operators provide service level agreements
(SLAs) to tenant clients to ensure commitment to uptime and operational parameters. Multi tenant data center
operators typically offer 2N, N+1, N and hybrid mesh solutions for power redundancy with multiple POPs (point of
presence)/ POEs (point of entrance), as well as multiple metro/WAN connectivity providers to provide redundancies
that increase reliability. This enables clients to balance their redundancy/reliability needs against their cost options.
Some clients may require lower levels of reliablility for certain applications, such as deploying a lab environment;
Multi tenant data centers can match the reliability requirements to specific user requirements.
Reduced Latency
By providing direct connectivity to service providers, content providers, cloud providers, high-frequency traders,
financial transaction and peering partners also co-located at the multi tenant data center, latency can be
significantly reduced.
www.commscope.com 3
KEY ADVANTAGES
Savings
By outsourcing data center services instead of building, hosting, maintaining and upgrading them themselves,
multi tenant data center tenants can realize significant OpEx and CapEx savings. Most companies are not in the
business of building and operating data centers. The expertise and efficiencies gained by multiple builds and
design iterations have enabled Multi tenant data center operators to optimize their designs and operational
efficiencies. Multi tenant data center operators can not only build a data center more cost-efficiently but are
also able to operate it more cost-effectively, as well. Building a traditional data center is a significant capital
expense for enterprises; Multi tenant data center operators offer conversion from CapEx to OpEx by leasing the
data center to the client, and also offer savings from tenant improvement or asset amortization. Enabling direct
connection between enterprises, vendors, content providers and cloud providers in the same facility eliminates
the need for metro/WAN connections that have backhaul and bandwidth charges. Multi tenant data centers offer
clients the ability to scale as they grow, and to deploy assets on a just in time basis.Most leases run from three
to 15 years, which gives the customer the ability to dynamically manage their business versus trying to over-plan
and build a traditional data center that is an up to 30-year depreciating asset.
Security
A multi tenant data center offers multiple levels of security against external threats plus faster, more thorough recovery
from disaster situations. The initial layer of security is at the entry points of the facility or campus, which are usually
surrounded by high steel fences, gates and bollards, and equipped with a badge or biometric readers and security
personnel. The facilities themselves are designed to restrict accessibility while maintaining a discrete appearance. Inside,
there are security guards, restricted access and man traps that are designed to slow and restrict entry. Only authorized
personnel are allowed entry to designated areas via badge or biometric access. In addition, the entire campus is under
continuous monitoring via security cameras, and may often be subject to random security patrols.
www.commscope.com 4
Factors to consider when choosing a multi tenant data center

The best multi tenant data center providers help clients through all stages of the project, from need assessment through migration through
operation. They have the core competencies to understand, meet and exceed clients requirements.
High-quality, robust mechanical, electrical, and data Physical layer management that supports the
transport infrastructure that performs optimally and tenant’s differentiated services and allows visibility
deploys quickly, allowing for fast, simple changes. into the enterprise.
Scalability to readily expand capacity and functionality Direct access to cloud and content providers. Today’s
under the same roof to meet increasing data center and tomorrow’s data centers are and will continue
demand as the tenant’s business grows. This includes to be connected with content and cloud providers in
space, power and bandwidth scalability, and also the an effort to support internal and external customers.
ability to scale down should there be a shift in public The ability to have direct access to these providers
cloud utilization. improves latency and cost objectives.
Effective in-building wireless (IBW) service for tenants working

onsite, since data centers are often constructed with reinforced
materials that make IBW coverage difficult. Providing mobile
service to all mobile operators ensures that tenants have access,
ensuring their productivity and efficiency while they are onsite.
www.commscope.com 5
When designing the cabling infrastructure for

deployment in an MTDC, it is critical that the infrastructure
be able to scale up and down, and adapt to technology changes.
It must be able to integrate peer, cloud and hybrid strategies, and must also
ensure that adequate space is allocated for horizontal and vertical cable management
so that moves, adds and changes can be carried out easily. There is often the temptation to
fully load server and switch cabinets without consideration of cable management. While this may reduce
the amount of leased rack space, it also greatly increases the risk of downtime due to manual error.
Proper cabling design, along with the use of an automated infrastructure management (AIM) system, can reduce this risk.
www.commscope.com 6
Return back to full
Data Center eBook

of our experts now.
www.commscope.com
CO-110101.3-EN (08/18) CHAPTER 2
DATA
CENTERS
and future demands
Chapter 3
Data center topologies
and architectures
Chapter 3
Data center topologies
and architectures
Creating a blueprint for better data center performance

A data center networking architecture—the layout of the cabling infrastructure and the way servers are connected to
switches—must strike a balance between reliability, performance, agility, scalability and cost. It must also support both
current and future applications and speeds.
Key factors in selecting a data center architecture include:
The size of the Anticipated growth of Whether it's a new

current data center the data center installation or an upgrade
of a legacy system
www.commscope.com 2
3 | Data center topologies and architectures
There are three main data center topologies in use today—and each has its advantages and
TOPOLOGIES trade-offs. In fact, some larger data centers will often deploy two or even all three of these
topologies in the same facility.
1. CENTRALIZED
The centralized model is an appropriate topologies for smaller Main distribution
- Networking core
data centers (under 5,000 square feet). As shown, there are - Networking access
- SAN core
separate local area network (LAN)/ storage area network - Main cross-connect
(SAN) environments and each one has home run cabling that
goes to each of the server cabinets and zones. Each server
is effectively cabled back to the core switches, which are
centralized in the main distribution area.
This provides very efficient utilization of port switches

and makes it easier to manage and add components. The
centralized topology works well for smaller data centers but
does not scale up well, which makes it difficult to support
expansions. In larger data centers, the high number of
extended-length cable runs required causes congestion in the
cable pathways and cabinets, and increases cost. While some
Storage area network
larger data centers use zoned or top-of-rack topologies for Server cabinet
(SAN) fiber optic
LAN traffic, they may also utilize a centralized architecture for
Ethernet network
the SAN environments. This is especially true where the cost Storage cabinet
fiber optic or copper
of SAN switch ports is high and port utilization is important.
www.commscope.com 3
2. ZONED
Main distribution
Zoned topology consists of distributed switching - Networking core
- SAN core
resources. As shown below, the switches can be - Main cross-connect
distributed among end-of-row (EoR) or middle-
of-row (MoR) locations, with chassis-based
switches typically used to support multiple server
cabinets. This solution is recommended by the
ANS/TIA-942 Data Center Standards and is very
scalable, repeatable, and predictable. Zoned
architecture is usually the most cost-effective design,
providing the highest level of switch and port
utilization while minimizing cabling costs.
In certain scenarios, end-of-row switching provides

performance advantages. For example, the local area
network (LAN) ports of two servers (that exchange
large volumes of information) can be placed on the
same end-of-row switch, for low-latency port-to- Storage area network
Server cabinet
(SAN) fiber optic
port switching. A potential disadvantage of end-
Ethernet network
of-row switching is the need to run cable back to Storage cabinet
fiber optic
the end-of-row switch. Assuming every server is
Ethernet network
connected to redundant switches, this cabling can copper Access switches
exceed what is required in top-of-rack architecture.
www.commscope.com 4
Main distribution
3. TOP OF RACK - Networking core
- SAN core
Top-of-rack (ToR) switching typically consists of two - Main cross-connect
or more switches placed at the top of the rack in

each server cabinet, as shown below. This topology
can be a good choice for dense one rack-unit (1RU)
server environments. All servers in the rack are cabled
to both switches for redundancy. The top-of-rack
switches have uplinks to the next layer of switching.
Top of rack significantly simplifies cable management
and minimizes cable containment requirements.
This approach also provides fast port-to-port
switching for servers within the rack and predictable
oversubscription of the uplink.
A top-of-rack design utilizes cabling more efficiently.

The tradeoffs are often an increase in the cost of
switches and the high cost for under-utilization
of ports. Top-of-rack switching may be difficult to Storage area network
manage in large deployments, and there is also the Server cabinet
(SAN) fiber optic
potential for overheating of local area network (LAN)
Ethernet network
switch gear in server racks. As a result, some data Storage cabinet
fiber optic
centers deploy top-of-rack switches in a middle-of-row
Ethernet network
or end-of-row architecture to better utilize switch ports copper Access switches
and reduce the overall number of switches used.
www.commscope.com 5
3 | Data center architectures
topologies and architectures
ARCHITECTURES
1. MESH NETWORK
WAN Carrier 1
The mesh network architecture, often
referred to as a “network fabric,” or leaf- Internet WAN Carrier 2
spine, consists of meshed connections
between leaf-and-spine switches. The ER Carrier
mesh of network links enables any-to-any
connectivity, with predictable capacity and Border leaf tier
lower latency—making this architecture
MDA
well suited for supporting universal
Spine switch tier
“cloud services.” With multiple switching
resources spread across the data center,
the mesh network is inherently redundant ZDA Leaf switch tier
for better application availability. These
distributed network designs can be much
more cost-effective to deploy and scale
EDA Servers
when compared to very large, traditional
centralized switching platforms.
www.commscope.com 6
2. THREE-TIER OR MULTI-TIER MODEL

WAN Carrier 1
The multi-tier architecture has been the

Internet WAN Carrier 2
most commonly deployed model used
in the enterprise data center. This design ER Carrier
consists primarily of web, application and
database server tiers running on various
Edge/core layer
platforms, including blade servers, 1RU
MDA
servers and mainframes.
Aggregation layer
ZDA Access layer
EDA Servers
SAN director layer
EDA
Disk arrays
www.commscope.com 7
3. MESH POINT OF DELIVERY (PoD)

WAN Carrier 1
The mesh point of delivery (PoD) architecture
features multiple leaf switches interconnected Internet WAN Carrier 2
within in the PoDs, with spine switches
typically aggregated in a central main ER Carrier
distribution area (MDA). Among other
advantages, this architecture enables multiple Edge/core leaf
PoDs to connect efficiently to a super-spine
MDA
tier. Data center managers can easily add
Super spine tier
new infrastructure to their existing three-tier
topology to support the low-latency east-
west data flow of new cloud applications. PoD full mesh PoD full mesh
Mesh PoD networks can provide a pool of ZDA

(each row,
Leaf mesh tier
low-latency compute and storage for these each hall)
applications that can be added without

disrupting the existing environment
EDA
(each hall)
Servers
www.commscope.com 8
4. SUPER SPINE MESH WAN Carrier 1
Super spine architecture is commonly Internet WAN Carrier 2

deployed by hyperscale organizations
ER Carrier
deploying large-scale data center
infrastructures or campus-style data centers.
Edge/core leaf
This type of architecture services huge
MDA
amounts of data passing east to west
Super spine tier
across data halls.
PoD full mesh PoD full mesh
ZDA Spine switches

(each row,
each hall)
Leaf switches
EDA
(each hall) Computer/
Storage pods
Ethernet link Ethernet / FCoE link
www.commscope.com 9
Data center equipment connection methods

There are two methods typically used to connect data center electronics via structured cabling: cross-connect and interconnect.
Cross-connect Interconnect
A cross-connect uses patch cords or jumpers to connect cabling An interconnect uses patch cords to connect
runs, subsystems and equipment to connecting hardware at each equipment ports directly to the backbone
end. It enables connections to be made without disturbing the cabling. This solution requires fewer
electronic ports or backbone cabling. A cross-connect provides components and is, therefore, less expensive.
excellent cable management and design flexibility to support future However, it reduces flexibility and introduces
growth. Designed for “any-to-any” connectivity, this model enables additional risk, as users must directly access
any piece of equipment in the data center to connect to any other the electronics ports in order to make the
regardless of location. A cross-connect also offers operational connection. Therefore, CommScope generally
advantages, as all connections for moves, add and changes are recommends utilizing cross-connects for
managed from one location. The major disadvantage is higher maximum flexibility and operational efficiency
implementation costs due to increased cabling requirements. in the data center.
www.commscope.com 10
3 | Data center architectures
topologies and architectures
Architecture for a higher-speed future

With newer technologies—25/50/100GbE, 32G and 128G Fibre Channel—
limitations on bandwidth, distance and connections are more stringent than with lower-speed legacy systems.
In planning the data center’s local area network (LAN)/storage area network (SAN) environment, designers must
understand the limitations of each application being deployed and select an architecture that will not only support current
applications but also have the ability to migrate to higher-speed future applications.
www.commscope.com 11
Return back to full
Data Center eBook

of our experts now.
www.commscope.com
CO-110101.3-EN (08/18) CHAPTER 3
DATA
CENTERS
and future demands
Chapter 4
High Speed Migration
Chapter 4
High Speed
Migration
Redesigning data center connectivity for a higher-speed future

To support the rapid growth of cloud-based storage and compute services, data centers are adapting their traditional
three-layer switching topologies to accommodate highly agile, low-latency performance. These new architectures resemble
“warehouse scale” facilities that are designed to support many different enterprise applications.
Spine switches
Leaf switches
Edge Edge Edge Edge Edge Edge

devices devices devices devices devices devices
Leaf-spine architectures, for example, create an optimized path for server-to server communication that can accommodate
additional nodes, as well as higher line rates, as the network grows. The meshed connections between leaf-and-spine
switches allow applications on any compute and storage device to work together in a predictable, scalable way regardless of
their physical location within the data center.
www.commscope.com 2
4 | High Speed Migration
Future-ready fabric network technology
Demand for lower costs and higher capacities in the data center is growing. New fabric
network systems that can better support cloud-based compute and storage systems are
becoming the architecture of choice. Their ability to deliver any-to-any connectivity with
predictable capacity and lower latency makes today’s fabric networks a key to enabling
universal cloud services.
These fabric networks can take many forms: fabric extensions in a top-of-rack
deployment, fabric at the horizontal or intermediate distribution area, and fabric in a
centralized architecture. In all cases, consideration must be given to how the physical
layer infrastructure is designed and implemented to ensure the switch fabric can scale
easily and efficiently.
The fabric has inherent redundancy, with multiple switching resources interconnected
across the data center to help ensure better application availability. These meshed
network designs can be much more cost-effective to deploy and scale when compared
to very large, traditional switching platforms.
www.commscope.com 3
The design of high-capacity links is more complex since the number of links and link speeds is increasing. Providing more data
center capacity means pushing the limits of existing media and communication channel technologies. As shown below, the
Ethernet Alliance Roadmap illustrates existing application standards and future application rates beyond one terabit per second.
This will further challenge complexity as application speeds move from duplex transmission to parallel transmission. The advent
of new technologies—shortwave wavelength division multiplexing (SWDM), OM5 wideband multimode fiber (WBMMF), bi-
directional (BiDi) transmission, coarse wavelength division multiplexing (CWDM) and more efficient line coding—is expected to
delay the transition to parallel optics.
ETHERNET ROADMAP
THE ETHERNET ROADMAP
Mbps Gbps Tbps
10 100 1 10 40 100 2.5 5 25 400 50 200 800 1.6 3.2 6.4 >10
1983 1995 1998 2002 2010 2016 2017 2018-2019 est. 2020
Ethernet speed Speed in development Possible future speed
www.commscope.com 4
Tomorrow's possible interfaces
The combination of shortwave wavelength

division multiplexing (SWDM) and OM5
wideband multimode fiber (WBMMF) provides
the opportunity to extend the use of multimode
technology, which continues to be the most
prevalent fiber technology deployed in data centers.
Image Courtesy of the Ethernet Alliance
www.commscope.com 5
4 | High Speed Migration RESOURCES
Design guide:
Fabric networks: Designing your
network for the future—
from 10G through 400G and beyond
Brochure:
High Speed Migration
Video:
SYSTIMAX Application Assurance:
High-speed application support—
guaranteed
Engineered solutions make complex Application note:

fabric networks easy to design, implement and manage. High Speed Migration:
Choosing the right multimode
Preterminated high-performance systems support next-generation network multi-fiber push on (MPO) system
for your data center
media, duplex and multifiber modular applications while reducing deployment management
time and expense.
www.commscope.com 6
Return back to full
Data Center eBook

of our experts now.
www.commscope.com
CO-110101.3-EN (08/18) CHAPTER 4
DATA
CENTERS
and future demands
Chapter 5
Multisource agreements
Chapter 5
Multisource
agreements
Bringing options to a changing environment
The data center is a complex environment, comprising a wide range of equipment and technology manufactured by many
different companies. Ever-increasing bandwidth and line rates have led to optical fiber being the preferred technology to enable
higher speeds. To ensure proper operation and maximum efficiency of the data center networks, optical transceivers of the
same type must be interchangeable and interoperable so replacements and upgrades can be performed quickly and easily,
without the need to replace or modify other network equipment.
The solution is a multisource agreement (MSA)—an

agreement among multiple manufacturers to make
equipment consistent and interchangeable by defining a
common physical form for various devices and components.
In the case of data center connectivity, there are MSAs that
cover both the specification and implementation of the
optical transceivers made by various manufacturers.
The phenomenal growth in data, voice and video has

triggered the need for higher and higher speeds in the data
center and across data centers. This has driven the standards
There are now many different MSAs reflecting the variety of
bodies to develop higher application speeds, which in turn
applications we see in the data center:
have driven the need for new MSAs. Per the latest version
of the Ethernet Roadmap, there are currently seven new 10G, 25G, 40G, 50G, 100G, 200G, singlemode,
applications in progress—most of which involve fiber optics. multimode, and others.
www.commscope.com 2
5 | Multisource agreements
Examples of optical MSAs

The optical transceiver multisource agreement (MSA) environment is very dynamic, with numerous MSAs—too many to
list in this publication. These MSAs cover everything from form factor, application (standard, prestandard or proprietary),
maximum power consumption, fiber connector type, strand count, wavelength and cable reach. Examples of current and
future MSAs are shown below:
TODAY'S INTERFACES TOMORROW'S POSSIBLE INTERFACES

Images Courtesy of the Ethernet Alliance
Twisted-pair
category “X”
LEARN MORE
about tomorrow's
Duplex and parallel
optical fiber
possible interfaces
on the next page >>>
www.commscope.com 3
QSPF-DD OBO
QSFP-DD—“Quad Small Factor OBO, or Consortium for On-Board
Pluggable—Double Density.” Optics (COBO)
The smallest 400 Gbps module will provide Eliminates the E/O function traditionally
backwards compatibility to 40GbE and performed by transceivers, meaning the
100GbE QSFP modules. Will support Ethernet, bandwidth density at the faceplate can be
FibreChannel or InfiniBand protocols. dramatically increased. Data applications
to be supported by OBO are currently to
Designed to support: be defined, but this technology is primarily
targeted at data rates from 400 Gbps to
• 200 Gbps or an aggregate of 400 Gbps,
more than 800 Gbps.
using 25 Gbps NRZ modulation per lane or
50 Gbps PAM4 per lane
CFP8
OSPF CFP8—“C Form Factor Pluggable”
OSFP—“Octal Small Factor Pluggable.” Primarily aimed at supporting 400 Gbps
with a claim to offer a path to support 800
The smallest 400 Gbps module will Gbps in the future.
provide backwards compatibility to
40GbE and 100GbE QSFP modules. Designed to support:
Will support Ethernet, FibreChannel
or InfiniBand protocols.
• 400GBASE-SR16 parallel MMF
Image Courtesy of the Ethernet Alliance
(16x25G NRZ)
Designed to support: • 400GBASE-FR8/LR8 duplex SMF
• 400GBASE-DR4 parallel SMF (8x50G PAM4 WDM)
(4x100G PAM4) • 400GBASE-DR4 parallel SMF
• 400GBASE-SR8 parallel MMF (4x100G PAM4)
(8x50G PAM4)
400GBASE-FR4 duplex SMF (4x100G PAM4 WDM)
A networking technology may come to market with multiple choices
•
• 400GBASE-FR8/LR8 duplex SMF (8x50G PAM4 WDM)

or generations of optical transceivers. The market will eventually
• 2x200GBASE-FR4 parallel SMF
identify the winning solution based on cost, size, power consumption,
• 2x100GBASE-CWDM4 parallel SMF
vendor support and other factors.
www.commscope.com 4
IMPLICATIONS FOR FIBER CABLING INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN
The clear trend in the development of new multisource agreements (MSAs) has been toward
both higher speeds and increased densities. Higher speeds are the result of new applications
standards that specify higher line rates. Higher densities have been driven largely by
technology advances that enable the transceiver to make use of lower power, which allows
for smaller packaging. As shown, the physically larger MSAs are designed to accommodate
higher power transceivers, while reduced power transceivers can make use of smaller MSAs
for more ports or higher density communication hardware.
Fortunately, each of the data center cabling standards (TIA 942, ISO/IEC 11801-5 and
CENELEC 50173-5) has standardized on two optical connectors for use in the data center:
the LC for single or duplex applications and the MPO for applications requiring more than
two fibers. This has simplified the fiber connectivity as the MSAs that are relevant in the
data center environment also have made use of the LC and MPO connectors. And, while the
standardization of connectors has helped simplify cabling, it has also become very important
to provide very flexible, agile connectivity that can accommodate the ever-increasing speeds
and the higher densities that are being driven by higher densities at the equipment faceplate.
www.commscope.com 5
5 | Multisource agreements RESOURCES
Standards:
Multisource agreements
www.commscope.com 6
Return back to full
Data Center eBook

of our experts now.
www.commscope.com
CO-110101.3-EN (08/18) CHAPTER 5
DATA
CENTERS
and future demands
Chapter 6
Fiber selection
Chapter 6
Fiber
selection
Vital connections for today's data centers

The data center is at the core of today’s business—and fiber-optic connectivity is the fabric, carrying vital data to drive critical
business processes and providing connectivity to link servers, switches and storage systems.
Data center designers have two high-level choices when it comes to fiber types: multimode fiber and singlemode fiber. In this chapter,
we’ll discuss the development, deployment and advantages of each fiber type, as well as the connectors that pull it all together.
Multimode fiber: the low-cost platform
coating
cladding
core
www.commscope.com 2
6 | Fiber selection
Today, multimode fiber (MMF) is the workhorse medium for This leap in performance is reflected in the classifications
data centers because it is the lowest-cost way to transport given by the standards bodies. OM1 and OM2 represented
data at high rates over the relatively short distances in these the earlier MMF types with low modal bandwidth and very
environments. MMF has evolved from being optimized for limited support for higher-speed optics. OM3 and OM4
multimegabit-per-second transmission using light-emitting represent the newer, laser-optimized MMFs typically installed
diode (LED) light sources to being optimized to support in data centers today. The following table provides examples
multigigabit transmission using 850 nm vertical cavity of some of the current data center applications and the
surface emitting laser (VCSEL) sources, which tend to be less maximum channel lengths over different fiber types.
expensive than their singlemode counterparts.
Standard, MSA or Mfg.

Application IEEE reference Media Speed Target distance
Specification
40GBASE-SR4 IEEE 802.3ba 4-pair MMF 150 m (OM4/OM5)
40GBASE-eSR4 - 4-pair MMF 400 m (OM4/OM5)
40G-BiDi - 1-pair MMF 150 m (OM4) 200 m (OM5)
40 Gigabit Ethernet 40G-SWDM - 1-pair MMF 40 Gb/s 350 m (OM4) 440 m (OM5)
40GBASE-FR IEEE 802.3bg 1-pair SMF 2 km
40GBASE-LR4 IEEE 802.3ba 1-pair SMF 10 km
40GBASE-ER4 IEEE 802.3ba 1-pair SMF 40 km
100GBASE-SR4 IEEE 802.3bm 4-pair MMF 100 m (OM4/OM5)
100GBASE-eSR4 - 4-pair MMF 300 m (OM4/OM5)
100GBASE-SR10 IEEE 802.3ba 10-pair MMF 150 m (OM4/OM5)
100G-SWDM4 - 1-pair MMF 100 m (OM4) 150 m (OM5)
100G-eSWDM4 - 1-pair MMF 300 m (OM4) 400 m (OM5)
100 Gigabit Ethernet 100 Gb/s
100G-PSM4 - 4-pair SMF 500 m
100G-CWDM4 Lite - 1-pair SMF 500 m
100G-CWDM4 1-pair SMF 2 Km
100GBASE-LR4 IEEE 802.3ba 1-pair SMF 10 km
100GBASE-ER4 IEEE 802.3ba 1-pair SMF 40 km
www.commscope.com 3
6 | Fiber selection
Introducing wideband multimode fiber (WBMMF)
OM3 and OM4 provide very high modal bandwidth at 850 multimode fiber (WBMMF), which optimizes the reach of
nm—the predominant wavelength that can be efficiently SWDM transmission that delivers four times more information
supported by VCSEL transmitters. To support an increase in with the same number of fiber strands over practical distances.
performance over a single pair of multimode fibers, additional Being optimized to support the additional wavelengths
wavelengths need to be transmitted alongside 850 nm, required for SWDM operation (in the 850 nm to 950 nm
achieved via a new technology—shortwave wavelength range), WBMMF ensures not only more efficient support for
division multiplexing (SWDM). Because the modal bandwidth future applications across the data center fabric, but also full
of OM3 and OM4 fibers was specified for laser operation at compatibility with legacy applications because it remains fully
850 nm only, a new specification for optical fiber was required. compliant with OM4 specifications.
Many data center managers are now considering wideband
Wave division multiplexing
www.commscope.com 4
6 | Fiber selection
By the middle of 2017, the journey to standardization of WBMMF cabling was complete, having been recognized by ISO/IEC
and TIA standard bodies. The OM5 designation was adopted for inclusion of this new cabled optical fiber category in the third
edition of the ISO/IEC 11801 standard. Once again, CommScope led the market in next-generation standards development
as well as product availability and was one of the first manufacturers to deliver a commercially available OM5 end-to-end
solution with the distinctive lime green color that is also being recognized by standards bodies. Well ahead of standards
ratification, CommScope introduced the LazrSPEED® OM5 Wideband solution in 2016, knowing that the support of higher
data throughput using low-cost optics is exactly what data center managers require to enable next-generation networks
today and in the future.
Indeed, the future of OM5 is very bright. At the end of 2017, the IEEE agreed to initiate a project to define next-generation
multimode transmission using shortwave division multiplexing—the transmission technology OM5 was designed to support.
GOALS AND BENEFITS
Enable Ethernet
Retain legacy application support of OM4
40G-SR, 100G-SR, 200G-SR, 400G-SR4
Increase capacity to > 100 Gbps per fiber

Enable Fiber Channel:
128G-SWDM, 256GFC-SWDM
Reduce fiber count by four
Extend MMF utility

Boost array cabling capacity for parallel applications
as universal data communication medium
www.commscope.com 5
6 | Fiber selection
Singlemode fiber: supporting longer distances

Designed with a much narrower core, singlemode fiber (SMF) is the technology of choice for longer-reach
applications in the data center, such as extended runs in the fabric between leaf-and-spine switches, spine
and routers, and into the transport network to connect data centers in different locations. SMF provides
higher bandwidth and does not have the modal dispersion limitations inherent in MMF. For this reason,
SMF is used in applications where support for higher and next-generation bandwidths can be absolutely
guaranteed to be supported. This makes it a perfect medium of choice for hyperscale and service provider
data center owners to deploy.
Very large data centers as well as hyperscale data centers typically deploy SMF to connect multiple halls and
extended equipment zones using a centralized cross-connects architecture at the MDA. They typically use
a dedicated optical distribution frame (ODF). Deploying an ODF can help ensure that cables are kept to an
optimum length for transmission, while equipment zones and other data halls can be quickly and efficiently
patched to one another with minimal disruption to service and networking equipment.
Singlemode fiber also enables duplex transmission at higher speeds because it is able to transport
multiple wavelengths, thus reducing fiber counts. It is anticipated that one of the 200GE and 400 GbE
applications will utilize four-pair parallel optics over SMF—taking advantage of the lower overall system
cost parallel optics can offer. The PSM4 multisource agreement (MSA) also defines a four-pair transceiver
for 100G applications.
www.commscope.com 6
6 | Fiber selection RESOURCES
White paper:
Wideband multimode fiber—
What is it and why does it make sense?
Design guide:
Fabric networks:
Designing your network for the future—
from 10G through 400G and beyond
Fiber connectors pull it all together

Fiber connectors have evolved along with fiber-optic cabling,
driven by increasing fiber density. The duplex LC connector emerged during
the early 2000s as the predominant two-fiber type—and remains so today.
While the evolution of the duplex connector was underway, array connectors (parallel optics) were also emerging.
First deployed in public networks, the multifiber push-on (MPO) connector has become a preferred choice for rapidly
deploying cabling into data centers. The compact form of the MPO allows 12 or more fibers to be terminated in a
compact plug, occupying the same space as a duplex LC. The MPO’s high density enables installation of preterminated,
high-strand-count cables, while eliminating the time-consuming process of field installing connectors on site.
www.commscope.com 7
Return back to full
Data Center eBook

of our experts now.
www.commscope.com
CO-110101.3-EN (08/18) CHAPTER 6
DATA
CENTERS
and future demands
Chapter 7
Optical distribution frames
Chapter 7
Optical distribution
frames
Take control of data center cabling for optimal performance

The ever-growing demand for more bandwidth to accommodate a wide array of new applications in the data center is driving
higher fiber counts, as more and more data centers are being designed and built to run high-speed applications for LAN/SAN.
These high-speed applications are based on fiber-optic transmission, making fiber-optic cabling the predominant transmission
medium in the data center now and into the future.
With more and more optical connections to contend with, the challenge becomes
how to add optical density to the fiber frame while still maintaining proper
accessibility, flexibility and manageability at the lowest possible cost. As data center
operators add more fiber-optic cabling, they often face an out-of-control situation in
terms of fiber count, density and space—resulting in potentially reduced availability
and higher cost of operation.
The attempt to address these issues by using high-density patch panels can make
the problem worse, if not done correctly. Trying to fit high-density cabling into
cabinets that are designed to house active equipment can result in a tangled
“spaghetti bowl” of cabling—especially in configurations where cable management
is essentially non-existent.
www.commscope.com 2
7 | Optical distribution frames
The solution to the problem has two parts:
Choosing a different cabling architecture

A centralized cross-connect configuration in the main distribution area (MDA) eliminates patching from the core
equipment cabinets. All active core ports from LAN/SAN are mirrored in central cross-connect cabinets—resulting
in safer operation and simplified design for future growth.
Having the right cross-connect solution

However, they often provide limited cable management for the patch cords connecting to the active equipment.
This scenario may be adequate for equipment connectivity, but does not provide cable management needed for
cross-connects. A best-in-class cross-connect solution consists of frames or cabinets that have been designed
around the fiber patch panels along with providing patch cord management to accommodate the quantity and
types used today and those that will be used in the future. Only when all of this is considered can the data center
designer design the cabling infrastructure properly.
www.commscope.com 3
To meet these challenges today and equip their facilities for future growth, data centers must be designed with
optical distribution frames (ODFs) functioning as cross-connects in the main distribution area (MDA).
www.commscope.com 4
A proven telecom solution comes to the data center

Optical distribution frames (ODFs) have been available for years, used Both of these trends require deploying much more fiber in the data
primarily in telecommunication providers’ central offices, where tens of center, resulting in massive patch cord changes in both number and
thousands of optical fibers converge at a single location. With similar size. ODFs can easily deal with these challenges because they are
challenges now facing data center operators, using ODFs to manage optimized for cable management, offering bend radius protection
data center cabling has become an effective option. for fiber patch cords and over-length storage for efficient use of the
ODF—even with thousands of patch cords in it.
Since cross-connect ODFs are optimized for cabling, not for
equipment, they are able to solve the two largest data center cable Correctly designed, cross-connect ODFs function very effectively as the
management problems: those caused by application migration toward single point of distribution for all LAN, SAN and telecommunication
parallel fiber-optic applications, and those caused by the expected services in the data center, delivering best-in-class cable management
growth of the data center itself. and reduced operations costs, with these advantages:
Easy servicing Increased availability Optimal flexibility Enhanced security
Precabled ODFs allow fast Cabling can be added or Equipment can be connected Requires no direct patching at
moves, adds and changes changed without disrupting regardless of its location the switch/SAN director
running systems
www.commscope.com 5
Return back to full
Data Center eBook

of our experts now.
www.commscope.com
CO-110101.3-EN (08/18) CHAPTER 7
DATA
CENTERS
and future demands
Chapter 8
Automated infrastructure
management
Chapter 8
Automated infrastructure
management
The data center connectivity challenge

In today’s fast-evolving data centers, expanding the fiber- Demand for fast data transmission and efficient network
optic infrastructure is vital for providing the bandwidth and performance has been fueled by requirements to support
speed needed to transmit large amounts of data to and from virtualization, convergence and cloud computing, as well as high-
multiple sources. As switches with 40G and 100G ports become bandwidth applications like streaming video. But, while supporting
commonplace, data center infrastructure becomes more complex— more bandwidth is important, there are additional trends impacting
and it is becoming increasingly clear that traditional, manual data center fiber infrastructure management:
methods for managing fiber connectivity may not be sufficient.
Higher port density Increased complexity of Increased complexity of

Space is at a premium in the data center, cabling topology network architecture
which has led to higher densities of fiber Point-to-multipoint connections The move to heavily-meshed leaf-
ports on equipment and fiber shelves. have become commonplace with spine network architecture has
With increased density comes the the advent of 40G and 100G greatly increased the number of
increased risk of making or removing the technology—making manual record- connections along with a need for the
wrong connection— potentially causing
keeping nearly impossible. consistent and accurate deployment of
widespread disruption in network services.
connectivity pattern/mesh for orderly
network expansions in the data center.
www.commscope.com 2
8 | Automated infrastructure management
Taking AIM at data center downtime

In its simplest terms, automated infrastructure management (AIM) is an integrated hardware and software
platform that manages the entire physical layer. It fully documents the cabling infrastructure, including
connected equipment, to provide a complete view of where devices are located and how they are connected.
By capturing information about every physical connection in the network and relaying it to higher-level
network management systems, the AIM system provides an accurate, real-time view of the physical network
connectivity and can issue alarms when an unplanned or unauthorized change occurs. AIM streamlines
the provisioning and monitoring of data center connectivity; produces up-to-date reports on the status and
capacity of the network infrastructure; and ultimately can reduce data center downtime and mean time to
repair through real-time, precision notification of connectivity outages.
AIM systems also improve other aspects of data center operations, including:
Capacity management Troubleshooting Security Automated workflow

AIM provides an accurate view The precise location of a AIM can raise alerts when a port is AIM reduces time-intensive
of available panel, switch and connectivity problem is disconnected or connected in an manual processes by generating
server ports, which helps address documented so the technician unauthorized location— electronic work orders and
network capacity challenges doesn’t have to spend time for example, if someone has enabling guided administration
by eliminating dormant ports— verifying manual documentation moved a server without of connectivity changes. This
resulting in more efficient or hunting for the location following approved change helps minimize human errors and
planning and reduced CapEx. of a problem. management processes. unplanned network downtime.
www.commscope.com 3
8 | Automated infrastructure management
Choosing an AIM system that exceeds the standard
The IT industry has recognized the important role intelligent

infrastructure solutions can play in data center management and has
established standards for automated infrastructure management (AIM)
capabilities and functions.
In early 2017, the ISO/IEC WG3 SC25 group is expected to publish the
ISO/IEC 18598 Standard for Automated Infrastructure Management
Systems—Requirements, Data Exchange and Application.
To meet the key requirements of ISO/IEC 18598, an AIM solution must:
Identify and track the physical location of end

Automatically detect and monitor connectivity
devices connected to the network
Automatically detect, document and monitor the presence

of network devices
Generate a graphic representation of end-to-end
connectivity (circuit trace)
Automatically update records when any monitored
connections are modified
Document connectivity between non-AIM enabled ports Generate electronic work orders and automatically monitor
and other equipment the accuracy of implementation of work order tasks
www.commscope.com 4
8 | Automated infrastructure management RESOURCES
Standards:
ISO/IEC AIM Document
(18598/DIS draft)
Brochure:
imVision®
automated infrastructure
management
Video:
Managing critical
data center fiber
connectivity with imVision
The emergence of AIM standards

is making intelligent connectivity
a mission-critical technology for data centers. Video:
Since cabling infrastructure migration often requires imVision.
Infrastructure management.
replacement of fiber-optic modules, now is the time to Made easy.
upgrade to an AIM-driven intelligent connectivity system.
www.commscope.com 5
Return back to full
Data Center eBook

of our experts now.
www.commscope.com
CO-110101.3-EN (08/18) CHAPTER 8
DATA
CENTERS
and future demands
Chapter 9
Designing for fiber TAPs
Chapter 9
Designing for
fiber TAPs
Real-time network monitoring with no service interruptions

The need for real-time network traffic monitoring in today’s data center has become
compelling. Data center network administrators need to gain better visibility of their
networks to optimize the performance of mission-critical applications and keep their
networks secure.
In fiber-optic data center networks, a traffic access point (TAP) is a critical tool for data
center monitoring and management. A TAP module can be integrated into the fiber
cabling infrastructure to enable network traffic monitoring from the physical layer (layer 1)
and above in real time—without interrupting network service.
A TAP module is a compact package of fiber-optic couplers or Because TAPs continuously pass all traffic running between the
splitters that passively diverts a fixed percentage of light energy endpoint network devices with zero latency—while duplicating that
away from main transportation channels to monitor the traffic exact same traffic to the monitor ports simultaneously—they are
status or content without disrupting the main channel traffic. The one of the most efficient ways to monitor traffic and network link
optical couplers or splitters inside a TAP module split the light quality in data center networks.
energy from the input port into two output ports according to a
TAP modules help improve managers’ understanding of how
designed split percentage—usually diverting from 10 to 50 percent
applications perform and how to measure their performance, and
to the TAP.
ensure that it meets the required standard. They are also being used
to meet compliance or legal requirements that require a business to
deploy reasonable tools to secure the data center network.
www.commscope.com 2
9 | Designing for fiber TAPs
InstaPATCH® 360
MPO/LC module
LC/LC jumper
cable to equipment
MMF 70/30 MPO/MPO

main port 70 percent trunk cable
LC/LC jumper
cable to equipment
Fiber TAP with 70/30 split
www.commscope.com 3
Designing a TAP solution to mitigate insertion loss
By diverting network traffic for monitoring, traffic access points (TAPs) can introduce additional insertion loss into the network.
While industry standards for Ethernet and Fibre Channel are not expressly designed to support the added loss of TAPs, with pre-
engineering and the use of high-performance cabling systems it is possible to deploy TAPs and retain useful channel topologies.
As shown below, the evolution of higher-speed applications includes reduced loss budgets—underscoring the need for low-loss
components and engineering guidelines.
db link loss for transmission
Year Application Data rate Standard Loss budget (dB)
1982 Ethernet 10 Mbps IEEE 802.3 12.5
1991 Fast Ethernet 100 Mbps IEEE 802.3 11.0

Short wavelength
1998 10/100 Mbps TIA/EIA-785 4.0
fast Ethernet
2000 1G Ethernet 1,000 Mbps IEEE 802.3z 3.56
2004 8 FC and 10 G Ethernet 10,000 Mbps IEEE 802.3ae 2.60
2010 16 GFC and 40 G Ethernet 40,000 Mbps IEEE 802.3ba 1.9
2010 100 G Ethernet 100,000 Mbps IEEE 802.3ba 1.5
2015 32 GFC 28.800 Mbps INCITS BSR 512-2015 1.86 OM4
www.commscope.com 4
When designing a traffic access point (TAP) solution for a particular application,
many factors need to be taken into consideration, including:
1 Loss created by the selected TAP splitter
2 Length and number of connections

within the main and two monitor channels
3 Intended application
(for example, 8G Fibre Channel or 10G Ethernet)
1 Loss created by the selected TAP splitter
www.commscope.com 5
9 | Designing for fiber TAPs RESOURCES
Design guide:
SYSTIMAX® InstaPATCH® 360
traffic access point (TAP)
solution design guide
Calculator:
Fiber performance
(link loss)
calculator
Using TAPs in high-speed fiber links can be complicated—

especially in a do-it-yourself retrofit application.
Instead of trial and error, today’s best practice is to design and deploy an engineered solution
in the data center. Designing TAPs into the data center from the start enables the addition of monitoring
capability when it is needed in the future, while proving the operational links to be reliable and solid on day one.
www.commscope.com 6
Return back to full
Data Center eBook

of our experts now.
www.commscope.com
CO-110101.3-EN (08/18) CHAPTER 9

Data Centre

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Data Centre

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Data Centre

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DATA

Setting the standards for higher speeds

CommScope monitors data center trends and

Server to Switch Connectivity

How the standards define data center cabling

Application Standards Cabling Standards

(Ethernet standards) have been particularly TIA® CENELEC ISO/IEC

Each of these groups has a general standard which defines structured

Keep up with the standards

Since data center cabling infrastructure

CommScope pushes the boundaries of communications

Freeing enterprises to focus

Factors to consider when choosing a multi tenant data center

Effective in-building wireless (IBW) service for tenants working

When designing the cabling infrastructure for

CommScope pushes the boundaries of communications

Creating a blueprint for better data center performance

Key factors in selecting a data center architecture include:

The size of the Anticipated growth of Whether it's a new

This provides very efficient utilization of port switches

In certain scenarios, end-of-row switching provides

or more switches placed at the top of the rack in

A top-of-rack design utilizes cabling more efficiently.

2. THREE-TIER OR MULTI-TIER MODEL

The multi-tier architecture has been the

ZDA Access layer

SAN director layer

3. MESH POINT OF DELIVERY (PoD)

Mesh PoD networks can provide a pool of ZDA

applications that can be added without

4. SUPER SPINE MESH WAN Carrier 1

Super spine architecture is commonly Internet WAN Carrier 2

PoD full mesh PoD full mesh

ZDA Spine switches

Ethernet link Ethernet / FCoE link

Data center equipment connection methods

Architecture for a higher-speed future

CommScope pushes the boundaries of communications

Redesigning data center connectivity for a higher-speed future

Edge Edge Edge Edge Edge Edge

Future-ready fabric network technology

Mbps Gbps Tbps

Ethernet speed Speed in development Possible future speed

Tomorrow's possible interfaces

The combination of shortwave wavelength

Image Courtesy of the Ethernet Alliance

Engineered solutions make complex Application note:

CommScope pushes the boundaries of communications

The solution is a multisource agreement (MSA)—an

The phenomenal growth in data, voice and video has

Examples of optical MSAs

TODAY'S INTERFACES TOMORROW'S POSSIBLE INTERFACES

• 400GBASE-FR8/LR8 duplex SMF (8x50G PAM4 WDM)

IMPLICATIONS FOR FIBER CABLING INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN

CommScope pushes the boundaries of communications

Vital connections for today's data centers

Multimode fiber: the low-cost platform

Standard, MSA or Mfg.

Introducing wideband multimode fiber (WBMMF)

Wave division multiplexing