Scopus Submission Paper
Scopus Submission Paper
Scopus Submission Paper
Volume 16 • Issue 4
Tarun Kumar Singhal, Symbiosis Centre for Management Studies (SCMS), Symbiosis International University (Deemed),
Pune, India
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5929-183X
ABSTRACT
Owing chiefly to the lack of suitable technology solutions, India is experiencing both a shortage and
wastage of blood units. In addressing such a challenge, the authors explore the unique role of blockchain
and internet-of-things technologies in the overall blood supply chain management as an appropriate
technology solution. The study employs an integrated task-technology fit and technology acceptance
model to empirically test and identify key factors influencing the adoption intention of the blockchain
and internet-of-things-enabled system. With the need to preserve donor and recipient data integrity
and data privacy, the respective state and national health departments strictly regulate blood banks.
Accordingly, the study also explores the role of government in supporting and overseeing security
concerns in the future adoption of the blockchain and internet-of-things technologies. Finally, a solution
based on the blockchain and internet-of-things technologies to ensure the sufficient availability of
blood units at the national level is envisioned.
Keywords
Blockchain (BC), Blood Bank Management (BBM), Internet of Things (IoT), Task-Technology Fit (TTF),
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
1. INTRODUCTION
Human blood is highly perishable. As blood is transfused from one person to another and cannot be
created synthetically, it often will be short in supply but high in demands (Boonyanusith & Jittamai,
2017). In an equitable and modern healthcare system, the World Health Organization (WHO)
recommends a seamless blood supply chain (SC) at the national level to reduce child mortality,
prevent infections, and improve overall health and wellbeing of a country’s citizens (WHO, 2016;
Pal, Kar, Zaman, & Pal, 2011). As well, WHO (2008) recommends that to avail blood products to
patients on-demand, a country’s blood ecosystem should ensure that throughout the lifecycle, these
1
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
blood products remain safe; therefore, a critical aspect of the social wellbeing of any society, is the
systematic management of the blood SC.
Accordingly, all of the blood SC stakeholders in a country such as blood banks, hospitals,
healthcare service providers, government agencies, and citizens should unite to meet its overall blood
demand (NACO, 2016). A lack of coordination among any of the stakeholders can lead to blood
shortage, sometimes even transfusion-related diseases (Nanu, 2001). In India, managing the blood SC
is often challenged with multiple complications (GOI, 2003). Specifically, blood banks play a critical
role in the overall blood SC by matching the supply-demand volumes (Lowalekar & Ravichandran,
2014). In 2017, among 2,903 blood banks in India, about 11 million units of blood (lesser than the
annual target of 13 million units) were cumulatively collected during the year (DOHFW, 2018), while
over 1 million units had ultimately to be discarded due to reasons such as storage date expiry and/or
deterioration, blood infections and donor reactions (NACO, 2017), averaging in an annual shortfall
of 3 million units. Another issue with India’s blood SC is that about thirty-four percent (34%) of
these blood banks operate without a license (Pal et al., 2011), thereby incurring a high risk of non-
compliance while posing a severe threat to the patient’s life.
While some blood banks have a preliminary Blood Bank Management Information System
(BBMIS) to manage the staff activities and inventory updates (Sulaiman, Hamid & Yusri, 2015),
however, apart from poor coordination among multiple blood-bank stakeholders (NACO, 2016), there
has been a general lack of adopting emerging technologies such as Blockchain and Internet-of-Things
(IoT) to address the challenges faced in blood-bank SC. As this has been identified as one of the
critical factors for blood wastage (Lowalekar & Ravi, 2017) in India, a theoretical model is urgently
needed to better understand the adoption of such technologies. Here, we attempt to address the key
research question: What factors affect the adoption intention of Blockchain and IoT technologies in
blood bank management?
The organization of the rest of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we detail background
information via a comprehensive review of the extant literature on BBMIS, IoT and Blockchain.
Following this, in Section 3, an integrated framework based on key constructs drawn from the Task-
Technology Fit (TTF) and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), along with other crucial concepts
such as Government Support and Security Concerns, is proposed as a preliminary theoretical approach
towards hypotheses development for this study. Section 4 then shifts focus to research methodology,
where concepts such as measures, research instrumentation, sampling and data collection as well as
response and method bias are highlighted. Attention on the statistical modeling and results is directed
then to Section 5 whereas Section 6 discusses the logical interpretations and practical implications of
these findings. Finally, concluding remarks with insights on the study limitations and future works
are also provided at the end of Section 7.
2. BACKGROUND
Owing primarily to the short shelf life and varied supply-demand frequency of blood products
(Boonyanusith & Jittamai, 2017; Pierskalla, 2005), the literature on perishable items SC classifies
blood supply chain management (SCM) as a complex management problem. Attention to these
problems have now generated studies that highlight how the Blockchain and the IoT technologies
could have assisted in the efficient management of the perishable item SC (Queiroz & Wamba,
2019; Clauson, Breeden, Davidson & Mackey, 2018; Ben-Daya, Hassini & Bahroun, 2017; Biswas,
Muthukkumarasamy & Tan, 2017; Dada & Thiesse, 2008; Verdouw, Wolfert, Beulens & Rialland,
2016). Among these works, Boonyanusith & Jittamai (2017) and Abarca, De la Fuente, Abril, García
& Pérez-Ocón (2009) recommended IoT-based solutions for several blood bank activities such as
inventory management and transportation monitoring. Jayaraman, Saleh & King (2019), Peltoniemi &
Ihalainen (2019), and Clauson et al. (2018) conceptualized a Blockchain and IoT solution for tracking
products in the healthcare SC, reducing systemic errors and redundant efforts.
2
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
Notwithstanding, the adoption of Blockchain and IoT technologies in the context of blood bank
management remains scarcely investigated. In the following sections, we divide the literature review
into three subparts: (a) BBMIS; (b) IoT; and (c) Blockchain.
2.3 Blockchain
Blockchain is another emerging technology that was conceptualized by someone with a pseudo name,
Satoshi Nakamoto, around the 2008 financial crisis (Nakamoto, 2008). In a peer-to-peer fashion,
Blockchain comprises a network of participants where all participants share identical, immutable
and time-stamped information via distributed consensus algorithms without the necessity of any
centralized authority (Batubara, Ubacht & Janssen, 2018). The chain of transaction blocks is linked
3
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
via cryptography with the shared data features of the Blockchain becoming valuable characteristics
in situations where quick decision-making has to be executed among multiple unknown parties (Turk
& Klinc, 2017). A study by Ølnes, Ubacht & Janssen (2017) projects Blockchain to lead to increased
citizen trust and reduced corruption in governmental services.
Tse, Zhang, Yang, Cheng & Mu (2017) and Tian (2016) studied Blockchain for the perishable
items SC to meet the adequate quality and safety standards. Apte & Petrovsky (2016) suggested that
the transparency offered by the Blockchain network could be beneficial in the pharmaceutical SC
for faster and more reliable movement tracking of medical supplies. Ahram, Sargolzaei, Sargolzaei,
Daniels & Amaba (2017) studied Blockchain application in the healthcare services to improve the
integrity of patients’ e-health records. Jayaraman et al. (2019) proposed an IoT- Blockchain solution
that brings disparate players together in the healthcare SC for higher operational efficiency. Similarly,
Düdder & Ross (2017) explored Blockchain for SC information security.
In Figure 1, a conceptual model based on our review of the extant literature relating to identifying
key factors influencing the adoption intention of Blockchain and IoT for BBMIS is proposed.
Two underlying theories as discussed below provide the key constructs being adapted and
detailed in this theoretical framework. First, the Task-Technology Fit (TTF) theory infers that task
characteristics (TSK) and technology characteristics (TCH) are key predictors of TTF (Goodhue &
Thompson, 1995). Moreover, according to Chen (2019), the TTF construct is considered a predictor
for perceived usefulness (PUF) and perceived ease of use (PEU). Second, it is from the Technology
Adoption Models (TAM) where the two constructs of PUF and PEU, which have been identified
as predictors of Behavioral Intention (BINT), have been theoretically derived (Davis, 1989). In the
following sections, the historical development of both these theories will now be highlighted.
4
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
of reasoned actions (TRA), followed by Ajzen’s (1985) theory of planned behavior (TPB) formed the
basis in measuring the adoption intention of IT solutions. Drawing on TRA and TPB, Davis (1989)
proposed TAM to measure adoption intention and the subsequent use of IT solutions (Venkatesh &
Davis, 2000; Queiroz & Wamba, 2019). TAM theorizes that PEU and PUF will impact the user’s
adoption behavior – a prediction that would consistently be validated when measuring users’ attitudes
towards IT-led solutions over the years (Chen, 2019).
• Relationship between TSK & TTF - Tasks are the activities that process specific inputs, producing
desired outputs. TSK characteristics are influenced by IT (Goodhue & Thompson, 1995); as
well, unequivocal tasks having interdependence can be fit for technology use (Chen, 2019; Wu
& Chen, 2017). Blood bank TSK such as blood storage, audit, and inter-department coordination
are expected to be fitting for technological assistance in delivering blood to needy patients. Past
research shows TSK positively influences TTF (Chang, Lee & Ji, 2016; Ma et al., 2013; Yen,
Wu, Cheng & Huang, 2010).
o Hypothesis H1: TSK has a positive influence on TTF.
• Relationship between TCH & TTF - Users carry out their organizational tasks via some form
of technology tools. TCH are those characteristics that contribute to the completion of tasks
efficiently (Goodhue & Thompson, 1995). TCH, such as accuracy, compatibility, currency, and
reliability, makes the technology attractive for users to adopt it for their tasks (Ma et al., 2013).
We assume here that Blockchain and IoT technologies can assist blood-bank stakeholders. Past
5
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
studies show that TCH positively affects TTF (Chang et al., 2016; Chen, 2019; Wu & Chen,
2017; Yen et al., 2010).
o Hypothesis H2: TCH has a positive effect on TTF.
• Relationship between TTF & PUF and TTF & PEU - TTF is a measure that evaluates IT
suitability with task requirements (Goodhue & Thompson, 1995). Briefly, TTF measures IT
appropriateness for a given set of tasks. A good TTF will assist users in understanding whether
the IT is beneficial and effortless to carry out the tasks (Chen, 2019; Dishaw & Strong, 1999).
Within the context of Blockchain and IoT enabled BBMIS, TTF may positively affect PUF and
PEU. Results from past research indicates that TTF directly affects PUF and PEU (Chang et al.,
2016; Wu & Chen, 2017).
o Hypothesis H3: TTF has a positive impact on PUF.
o Hypothesis H4: TTF positively affects PEU.
• Relationship between PEU & PUF and PEU & BINT - PEU measures an individual’s perception
of technology as an effortless intervention (Davis, 1989). TAM posits that PEU affects both PUF
and BINT (Chen, 2019). Within the blood bank context, PEU of Blockchain and IoT enabled
BBMIS is expected to favorably impact PUF of blood bank stakeholders and BINT to adopt such
a system. Several previous studies have also shown that PEU positively influences both PUF and
BINT (Hong, Suh, & Kim, 2009; Wu & Zhang, 2014).
o Hypothesis H5: PEU has a positive influence on PUF.
o Hypothesis H6: PEU has a positive effect on BINT.
• Relationship between PUF & BINT - PUF measures an individual’s perception of a technology
system as a performance enhancement tool (Davis, 1989). TAM posits that users tend to adopt
an IT solution only if they believe that the solution is convenient in carrying out their job
more efficiently (Ma et al., 2013). In blood bank, Blockchain-IoT enabled BBMIS’s PUF may
influence blood bank stakeholder’s BINT to adopt such a system. Past studies have shown that
PUF positively affects BINT (Alraimi, Zo & Ciganek, 2015; Chang et al., 2016; Lee, Hsieh, &
Chen, 2013).
o Hypothesis H7: PUF positively affects BINT.
• Relationship between GSUP & BINT - GSUP is an essential determinant of novel IT adoption
in a highly regulated industry such as healthcare and blood banks. GSUP, in the form of
government’s policies and regulations, can influence the BINT of innovative solutions (Scupola,
2003; Tornatzky, Fleischer & Chakrabarti, 1990). The government can support IT adoption by
making appropriate changes to reporting and auditing norms as per newer IT capabilities (Lin &
Ho, 2008). In health care, the government can play a constructive role by formulating standards,
setting up a network, and incentivizing stakeholders to adopt the innovative IT solutions (Taylor
et al., 2005). Past Studies have shown GSUP positively affects BINT (Chiu, Chen & Chen, 2017;
Lian, Yen & Wang, 2014; Lin & Ho, 2008; Luthra, Kumar, Kumar & Haleem, 2011; Rowe,
Truex & Huynh, 2012).
o Hypothesis H8: GSUP has a positive effect on BINT.
• Relationship between SEC & BINT - SEC measures an individual’s perception of technology
being secure from external unauthorized access (Herath & Rao, 2009). IoT adoption is constrained
due to a perceived lack of security that may expose devices to external attacks and data breaches
(Hsu & Yeh, 2017). Similarly, security concerns such as a 51% attack or stealing of cryptographic
keys within the Blockchain network need to be addressed appropriately before implementing the
solution (Lin & Liao, 2017). Past studies have shown security concerns negatively impact BINT
(Grabner-Krauter & Kaluscha, 2003; McCole et al., 2010).
o Hypothesis H9: SEC has a negative effect on BINT.
6
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
4. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
4.1 Measures
Our conceptual framework combines TTF-TAM theoretical constructs along with GSUP and SEC to
measure the BINT for Blockchain, and IoT enabled BBMIS. A survey was conducted in both online
and offline mode for the primary data collection to validate the research hypotheses.
7
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
5. RESULTS
The researchers reached out to key stakeholders of blood banks for this study. Table 2 shows the
demographic profile of the survey respondents. While demographic data is collected as part of the
survey to ensure the eligibility of respondents, no significant changes had been found in the results
with respect to differences in age, gender, role, or work location of respondents within the study.
8
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
The insignificance of these variables is expected in the current study as the Blockchain and IoT
technologies are emerging and not as yet implemented throughout India.
5.1 PLS-SEM
As noted, the PLS-SEM path modeling technique was deployed to analyze the data and to study the
latent variables in this research. Gudergan, Ringle, Wende & Will (2008) recommended the PLS-
SEM technique for conceptual model validation and relationship analysis between observed and
latent variables. PLS-SEM modeling has also been applied in the past by other researchers to test an
existing theory as it provides more flexibility in terms of construct modeling (Hair, Ringle & Sarstedt,
2011; Henseler, 2010). SmartPLS software was applied for performing the PLS-SEM technique in
this work (Ringle, Wende & Will, 2005).
9
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
10
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
prior research (Chen, 2019; Daradkeh, 2019; Wu & Chen, 2017; Yen et al., 2010). Similarly, results
of the study indicated that TTF significantly affects PEU, which implies that Blockchain and IoT
enabled BBMIS will be easy to use with no significant learning efforts. Thus, H4 is supported, which
follows the prior research results with a positive relationship between TTF and PEU (Chang et al.,
2016; Chen, 2019; Daradkeh, 2019; Ma et al., 2013; Vanduhe, Nat & Hasan, 2020).
H5 tested the relationship between PEU and PUF. The analysis unveiled that PEU significantly
affects PUF. Hence, H5 is supported, which confirms that an easy to use Blockchain and IoT based
BBMIS will lead to higher perceived benefits of such a system. This finding conforms to prior
research outcomes in that PEU has positively affected PUF (Daradkeh, 2019; Ma et al., 2013; Wu &
Chen, 2017; Yen et al., 2010). H6 tested PEU’s impact on BINT. The analysis results suggested that
PEU significantly influences BINT, implying that the blood bank stakeholders intend to embrace
the Blockchain and IoT enabled BBMIS only when it is convenient to use. Hence, H6 is accepted,
which follows the prior research outcomes demonstrating a positive relationship between PEU and
BINT (Daradkeh, 2019; Ma et al., 2013; Wu & Chen, 2017; Yen et al., 2010).
The analysis also unveiled that PUF significantly affects BINT, implying that an improved
perceived performance of BBMIS will lead to positive BINT to adopt Blockchain and IoT based
systems. Thus, H7 is supported and confirms that PUF positively affects BINT, as shown in prior
research outcomes (Chang et al., 2016; Chen, 2019; Daradkeh, 2019; Ma et al., 2013).
Finally, the data analysis indicated that GSUP significantly affects BINT, suggesting strong
governmental support will lead to higher BINT to use Blockchain and IoT enabled BBMIS. Thus,
H8 is supported, which conforms to prior research expectations in a positive relationship between
GSUP and BINT (Chiu et al., 2017; Lian et al., 2014; Lin & Ho, 2008; Luthra et al., 2011; Rowe et
al., 2012). As well, the study analyzed the role of SEC on BINT. The data analysis unveiled that SEC
has a significant negative effect on BINT, and thus H9 is also accepted. The negative path coefficient
indicates that security concerns act as an inhibitor to BINT to use Blockchain and IoT based BBMIS.
This result confirms that SEC negatively affects BINT, as shown in the previous research (Al- Sharafi,
Arshah, Abo-Shanab & Elayah, 2016; Enaizan et al., 2018; Oliveira, Thomas, Baptista & Campos,
2016; Rahi & Abd. Ghani, 2018).
The overall findings (Figure 2) indicate that Blockchain and IoT are suitable IT solutions for a
sustainable national blood bank system in India, which aligns with the WHO recommendations and
justifies the unique contribution of this paper.
11
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
6. DISCUSSION
The PLS-SEM analysis of the data has shown that the conceptualized model variables TSK and TCH
have a positive influence on the TTF as postulated by Task-Technology Fit theory. More specifically,
the study results also unveiled that there is a positive relationship between TTF & PUF and TTF &
PEU; moreover, PUF, PEU & GSUP positively affect, whereas SEC negatively affects, the BINT.
A positive relationship between TSK and TTF demonstrated that blood bank coordination tasks
frequently deal with new types of scenarios and involve more than a single legal entity. TCH having
a significant effect on TTF affirms that the Blockchain and IoT technology characteristics help in
providing real-time, automated, and immutable information to remote stakeholders. As well, TTF
significantly affects PUF and PEU, indicating that users perceive that Blockchain and IoT technologies
are suitable IT solutions for various blood bank tasks, including collection, storage, monitor, and
dispatch of the blood products.
According to TAM, PUF has a positive effect on BINT, which confirms that Blockchain and IoT
based BBMIS will potentially improve the efficiency and productivity of blood bank stakeholders.
That PEU has a positive influence on BINT supports the assumption that the Blockchain and IoT
enabled BBMIS can be adopted without a lot of difficulties among end-users. The finding that
GSUP will have a positive influence on BINT confirms that strong governmental support would be
necessary for a higher adoption of new IT solutions. Last, the SEC construct having a negative effect
on BINT implies that higher security concerns would lead to a lower adoption of the Blockchain and
IoT enabled BBMIS.
Based on the aforementioned outcomes, the authors of this research paper propose a novel BBMIS
solution comprising Blockchain and IoT technologies (see Figure 3). The solution depicts an IoT
temperature sensor embedded in the cold storage unit of a blood bank. The IoT sensor can alert the
blood bank staff on their mobile device in case of power failure or abnormal temperature variations.
The IoT and blood unit stock data is stored on the blood bank server.
Each blood bank and a hospital can then be connected to a national blood bank Blockchain network
to manage at the municipal (city) or state level demand-supply gap in real-time. The government’s
health department can maintain and monitor the Blockchain network and regulate the blood banks
digitally to promote improved e-governance. Only those authorized and registered blood banks and
hospitals should be able to perform Blockchain write-transactions. Initially, therefore, it is proposed
to have a permissioned Blockchain network. Consensus algorithms such as Practical Byzantine Fault
Tolerance may be configured for transaction processing instead of other costly proof-of-work like
12
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
Figure 3. Proposed solution for blood bank management using Blockchain and IoT
consensus algorithms. Being a permissioned Blockchain network, the transaction throughput will be
much higher than its slower public Blockchain counterparts.
13
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
Likewise, Blockchain brings multiple benefits to blood bank stakeholders. It acts as a single truth
of data and removes the duplicate manual efforts in reconciliation among the various stakeholders.
The proposed blood bank Blockchain network can show real-time blood bank stock inventory to
patients and hospitals at the district, state, and national level. This is especially useful for finding
the availability of rare blood group stock in emergencies. With increased transparency, stakeholders
of the blood SC would then be able to plan blood donation camps as per the prevailing supply and
demand gaps. Moreover, every transaction related to each blood unit will be sequentially recorded on
the Blockchain. This chain of transactions would then help medical staff establish traceability before
transfusing to the patient. And the tamper-proof nature of Blockchain records will provide increased
resistance to any data manipulation attempts. Subsequently, the stringent regulatory audit process
of blood banks will become much easier for all. Additionally, the IoT devices can also be connected
to the blockchain network through cryptographic infrastructure, making them more secure from
hackers. In general, we expect that Blockchain would primarily improve the efficiency and security
of the national blood SC network.
This paper highlights that blood banks on a Blockchain network will be able to better serve patient
needs with real-time visibility into blood inventory, especially during emergencies. The blood donation
camps can be planned in a more coordinated manner so that only required blood units are collected
instead of stocking up excess quantities. With shared and immutable digital records on Blockchain,
the entire blood SC will become more transparent and hassle-free for blood bank stakeholders.
Blockchain technology will also enable a quicker root-cause analysis of any quality-related issue
leading to immediate corrective actions within the national level blood bank ecosystem.
The study demonstrates the application of an extended TTF-TAM framework for the adoption
of emerging IT-based solutions in the context of perishable items SC. External constructs such as
Government Support and Security Concerns, when added to theories such as the TTF and TAM,
further assisted in our understanding of IT diffusion in particular contexts. Additionally, IoT technology
would lead to better maintenance of blood bank equipment and can trigger appropriate response to
avoid any blood unit wastage. Although the current study found that Blockchain and IoT technologies
would be useful in overall blood SCM, there are few limitations to this study in terms of geography
and actual implementation. The research data is only collected from healthcare professionals and
blood bank managers based out of Pune metropolitan region in India. Caution needs to be exercised
before generalizing the results to other geographies. As well, the research only studied the behavioral
intention of Blockchain and IoT based blood bank management system. However, other constructs
such as Technology Readiness, Social Influence, Actual Usage, and Customer Satisfaction may
be investigated in future studies. Additionally, future researchers may explore various Blockchain
consensus algorithms and IoT protocols to further improve performance of the national blood bank
network.
Finally, the study underscores the importance of security of the IT solution. A more secure BBMIS
would help blood bank staff to spend more time on their core activities rather than worrying about the
system integrity. This entails IT architects to ensure the proposed solution has all the latest security
aspects incorporated in it. Similarly, the study highlights that the Blockchain and IoT enabled BBMIS
would digitize and streamline the audit process, which currently suffers from physical paper-based
record management and susceptible to manipulations. The study highlights the role of government
support in modifying related policies and regulations for higher adoption of emerging IT solutions.
Accordingly, the government authorities need to plan and incentivize stakeholders of the blood supply
chain. This would later assist the government in rolling out other emerging IT-based solutions as part
of larger e-governance initiative.
14
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
REFERENCES
Abarca, A., De la Fuente, M., Abril, J. M., García, A., & Pérez-Ocón, F. (2009). Intelligent sensor for tracking
and monitoring of blood temperature and hemoderivatives used for transfusions. Sensors and Actuators. A,
Physical, 152(2), 241–247. doi:10.1016/j.sna.2009.03.018
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information
technology: A replication. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 16(2), 227–247. doi:10.2307/249577
Ahram, T., Sargolzaei, A., Sargolzaei, S., Daniels, J., & Amaba, B. (2017, June). Blockchain technology
innovations. In 2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON) (pp. 137-141).
IEEE. doi:10.1109/TEMSCON.2017.7998367
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11–39).
Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
Al-Sharafi, M. A., Arshah, R. A., Abo-Shanab, E. A., & Elayah, N. (2016). The effect of security and privacy
perceptions on customers’ trust to accept internet banking services: An extension of TAM. Journal of Engineering
and Applied Sciences (Asian Research Publishing Network), 11(3), 545–552.
Alemdar, H., & Ersoy, C. (2010). Wireless sensor networks for healthcare: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15),
2688–2710. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.003
Alraimi, K. M., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2015). Understanding the MOOCs continuance. Computers &
Education, 80(80), 28–38. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.006
Apte, S., & Petrovsky, N. (2016). Will blockchain technology revolutionize excipient supply chain management?
Journal of Excipients and Food Chemicals, 7(3), 910.
Arif, M., Sreevas, S., Nafseer, K., & Rahul, R. (2012, December). Automated online Blood bank database. In
2012 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON) (pp. 012-017). IEEE. doi:10.1109/INDCON.2012.6420581
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. JMR, Journal of
Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. doi:10.1177/002224377701400320
Ashton, K. (2009). That ‘internet of things’ thing. RFID Journal, 22(7), 97–114.
Batubara, F. R., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2018, May). Challenges of blockchain technology adoption for
e-government: a systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on
Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age (pp. 1-9). doi:10.1145/3209281.3209317
Ben-Daya, M., Hassini, E., & Bahroun, Z. (2019). Internet of things and supply chain management: A literature
review. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15-16), 4719–4742. doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1
402140
Biswas, K., Muthukkumarasamy, V., & Tan, W. L. (2017). Blockchain based wine supply chain traceability
system. In Future Technologies Conference (FTC) (pp. 56-62). The Science and Information Organization.
Boonyanusith, W., & Jittamai, P. (2017). Transforming blood supply chain management with Internet of things
paradigm. In Digitalization in Supply Chain Management and Logistics: Smart and Digital Solutions for an
Industry 4.0 Environment. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (pp. 139-156).
Academic Press.
Briggs, L., Davis, R., Gutierrez, A., Kopetsky, M., Young, K., & Veeramani, R. (2009). RFID in the blood supply
chain—increasing productivity, quality and patient safety. Journal of Healthcare Information Management,
23(4), 54–63. PMID:19894488
Buse, K., & Hawkes, S. (2015). Health in the sustainable development goals: Ready for a paradigm shift?
Globalization and Health, 11(1), 13. doi:10.1186/s12992-015-0098-8 PMID:25890267
Chang, H. S., Lee, S. C., & Ji, Y. G. (2016). Wearable device adoption model with TAM and TTF. International
Journal of Mobile Communications, 14(5), 518–537. doi:10.1504/IJMC.2016.078726
Chen, N. (2019). Extending a TAM–TTF model with perceptions toward telematics adoption. Asia Pacific
Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(1), 37–54. doi:10.1108/APJML-02-2018-0074
15
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
Chiu, C. Y., Chen, S., & Chen, C. L. (2017). An integrated perspective of TOE framework and innovation
diffusion in broadband mobile applications adoption by enterprises. International Journal of Management
Economics and Social Sciences, 6(1), 14–39.
Cho, Y. (2017). A consumer satisfaction model based on the integration of EDT and TAM: Comparative study
of Korean and US consumers. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 29(5), 978–993. doi:10.1108/
APJML-07-2016-0127
Clauson, K., Breeden, E., Davidson, C., & Mackey, T. (2018). Leveraging Blockchain Technology to Enhance
Supply Chain Management in Healthcare. Blockchain in Healthcare Today, 1.
Dada, A., & Thiesse, F. (2008). Sensor applications in the supply chain: the example of quality-based issuing of
perishables. In The Internet of Things (pp. 140–154). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78731-0_9
Daradkeh, M. (2019). Visual analytics adoption in business enterprises: An integrated model of technology
acceptance and task-technology fit. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 11(1),
68–89. doi:10.4018/IJISSS.2019010105
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.
Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi:10.2307/249008
Davis, R., Geiger, B., Gutierrez, A., Heaser, J., & Veeramani, D. (2009). Tracking blood products in blood
centres using radio frequency identification: A comprehensive assessment. Vox Sanguinis, 97(1), 50–60.
doi:10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01174.x PMID:19320963
Dawley, R. E. (1984). U.S. Patent No. 4,441,329. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Dishaw, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task–technology fit
constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9–21. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00101-3
DOHFW. (2018). Annual Report 2017-18. Retrieved from https://www.mohfw.nic.in/sites/default/files/24Chapter.
pdf
Düdder, B., & Ross, O. (2017). Timber tracking reducing complexity of due diligence by using blockchain
technology. Joint Proceedings of the BIR, 28-30.
Enaizan, O., Zaidan, A. A., Alwi, N. M., Zaidan, B. B., Alsalem, M. A., Albahri, O. S., & Albahri, A. S. (2018).
Electronic medical record systems: Decision support examination framework for individual, security and privacy
concerns using multi-perspective analysis. Health and Technology, 1–28.
Erskine, M. A., Gregg, D. G., Karimi, J., & Scott, J. E. (2019). Individual decision-performance using spatial
decision support systems: A geospatial reasoning ability and perceived task-technology fit perspective. Information
Systems Frontiers, 21(6), 1369–1384. doi:10.1007/s10796-018-9840-0
Farmer, J. J. (1982, November). A Blood Bank Information Management System. Proceedings of the Annual
Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care (pp. 287-290). American Medical Informatics Association.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and
measurement error. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
Gao, L., & Bai, X. (2014). A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of the
internet of things technology. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(2), 211–231. doi:10.1108/
APJML-06-2013-0061
Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for
research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(1), 7. doi:10.17705/1CAIS.00407
GOI. (2003). Transfusion Medicine, Technical Manual. Director General of Health Services, Government of India.
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. Management
Information Systems Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. doi:10.2307/249689
16
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
Grabner-Kräuter, S., & Kaluscha, E. A. (2003). Empirical research in on-line trust: A review and critical
assessment. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 783–812. doi:10.1016/S1071-
5819(03)00043-0
Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural
elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29(7), 1645–1660. doi:10.1016/j.
future.2013.01.010
Gudergan, S. P., Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2008). Confirmatory tetrad analysis in PLS path modeling.
Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1238–1249. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.012
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol.
6). Pearson-Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory
and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Heeks, R. (Ed.). (2001). Reinventing government in the information age: International practice in IT-enabled
public sector reform (Vol. 1). Psychology Press.
Henseler, J. (2010). On the convergence of the partial least squares path modeling algorithm. Computational
Statistics, 25(1), 107–120. doi:10.1007/s00180-009-0164-x
Herath, T., & Rao, H. R. (2009). Encouraging information security behaviors in organizations: Role of penalties,
pressures and perceived effectiveness. Decision Support Systems, 47(2), 154–165. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.005
Hess, J. R. (2010). Conventional blood banking and blood component storage regulation: Opportunities for
improvement. Blood Transfusion, 8(3), 9–15. PMID:20606757
Hohberger, C., Davis, R., Briggs, L., Gutierrez, A., & Veeramani, D. (2012). Applying radio-frequency
identification (RFID) technology in transfusion medicine. Biologicals, 40(3), 209–213. doi:10.1016/j.
biologicals.2011.10.008 PMID:22079476
Hong, J. Y., Suh, E. H., & Kim, S. J. (2009). Context-aware systems: A literature review and classification.
Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8509-8522.
Hsu, C. W., & Yeh, C. C. (2017). Understanding the factors affecting the adoption of the Internet of Things.
Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 29(9), 1089–1102. doi:10.1080/09537325.2016.1269160
Jayaraman, R., Saleh, K., & King, N. (2019). Improving Opportunities in healthcare supply chain processes via
the Internet of Things and Blockchain Technology. International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems
and Informatics, 14(2), 49–65. doi:10.4018/IJHISI.2019040104
Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use.
Information & Management, 35(4), 237–250. doi:10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00096-2
Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior.
Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205–223. doi:10.1287/isre.13.2.205.83
Lee, D. Y., & Lehto, M. R. (2013). User acceptance of YouTube for procedural learning: An extension of the
Technology Acceptance Model. Computers & Education, 61, 193–208. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.001
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. (2003). The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future.
Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(50), 752–780. doi:10.17705/1CAIS.01250
Lee, Y. H., Hsieh, Y. C., & Chen, Y. H. (2013). An investigation of employees’ use of elearning systems:
Applying the technology acceptance model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(2), 173–189. doi:10.10
80/0144929X.2011.577190
Lewis, E. F., Hardy, M., & Snaith, B. (2013). An analysis of survey reporting in the imaging professions:
Is the issue of non-response bias being adequately addressed? Radiography, 19(3), 240–245. doi:10.1016/j.
radi.2013.02.003
17
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
Lian, J. W., Yen, D. C., & Wang, Y. T. (2014). An exploratory study to understand the critical factors affecting
the decision to adopt cloud computing in Taiwan hospital. International Journal of Information Management,
34(1), 28–36. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.09.004
Lin, C. Y., & Ho, Y. H. (2008). An empirical study on logistics service providers’ intention to adopt green
innovations. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 3(1), 17–26.
Lin, I. C., & Liao, T. C. (2017). A Survey of Blockchain Security Issues and Challenges. International Journal
of Network Security, 19(5), 653–659.
Lowalekar, H., & Ravi, R. R. (2017). Revolutionizing blood bank inventory management using the TOC thinking
process: An Indian case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 186, 89–122. doi:10.1016/j.
ijpe.2017.02.003
Lowalekar, H., & Ravichandran, N. (2014). Blood bank inventory management in India. Opsearch, 51(3),
376–399. doi:10.1007/s12597-013-0148-z
Luthra, S., Kumar, V., Kumar, S., & Haleem, A. (2011). Barriers to implement green supply chain management
in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique: An Indian perspective. Journal of
Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(2), 231–257. doi:10.3926/jiem.2011.v4n2.p231-257
Ma, C. M., Chao, C. M., & Cheng, B. W. (2013). Fit into Blended E-learning System. Journal of Applied
Sciences, 13(5), 736–742. doi:10.3923/jas.2013.736.742
MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and
procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2012.08.001
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures
in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. Management Information Systems
Quarterly, 35(2), 293–334. doi:10.2307/23044045
McCole, P., Ramsey, E., & Williams, J. (2010). Trust considerations on attitudes towards online purchasing:
The moderating effect of privacy and security concerns. Journal of Business Research, 63(9-10), 1018–1024.
doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.02.025
Menachemi, N. (2011). Assessing response bias in a web survey at a university faculty. Evaluation and Research
in Education, 24(1), 5–15. doi:10.1080/09500790.2010.526205
Michie, S., & Marteau, T. (1999). Non-response bias in prospective studies of patients and health care professionals.
International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2(3), 203–212. doi:10.1080/136455799295014
NACO. (2016). Assessment of Blood Banks In India – 2016. Retrieved from http://naco.gov.in/sites/default/files/
Assessment%20of%20Blood%20Banks%20in%20India%20-%202016.pdf
NACO. (2017). Data of discarded units. Retrieved from http://naco.gov.in/sites/default/files/DATA%20OF%20
DISCARDED%20UNITS.pdf
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
Nanu, A. (2001). Blood transfusion services: Organization is integral to safety. The National Medical Journal
of India, 14(4), 237–240. PMID:11547532
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., Baptista, G., & Campos, F. (2016). Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants
of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 404–414.
doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.030
Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., & Janssen, M. (2017). Blockchain in Government: Benefits and implications of distributed
ledger technology for information sharing. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 355–364. doi:10.1016/j.
giq.2017.09.007
Pal, R., Kar, S., Zaman, F. A., & Pal, S. (2011). The quest for an Indian blood law as of blood transfusion services
regulatory framework. Asian Journal of Transfusion Science, 5(2), 171–174. doi:10.4103/0973-6247.83246
PMID:21897599
18
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
Peltoniemi, T., & Ihalainen, J. (2019). Evaluating Blockchain for the Governance of the Plasma Derivatives
Supply Chain: How Distributed Ledger Technology Can Mitigate Plasma Supply Chain Risks. Blockchain in
Healthcare Today, 2.
Peoples, C., Parr, G., McClean, S., Scotney, B., & Morrow, P. (2013). Performance evaluation of green data
centre management supporting sustainable growth of the internet of things. Simulation Modelling Practice and
Theory, 34, 221–242. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2012.12.008
Pierskalla, W. P. (2005). Supply chain management of blood banks. In Operations research and health care.
Springer.
Pietersz, R. N. I. (1995). Automation/computerization in blood processing. Transfusion Science, 16(3), 235–241.
doi:10.1016/0955-3886(95)00028-V PMID:10159878
Queiroz, M. M., & Wamba, S. F. (2019). Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical
investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA. International Journal of Information Management, 46,
70–82. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.021
Rahi, S., & Abd. Ghani, M. (2018). The role of UTAUT, DOI, perceived technology security and game elements in
internet banking adoption. World Journal of Science. Technology and Sustainable Development, 15(4), 338–356.
Raj, J., & Tarun, S. (1991). Storing crossmatched blood: A perishable inventory model with prior allocation.
Management Science, 37(3), 251–266. doi:10.1287/mnsc.37.3.251
Ramani, K. V., Mavalankar, D., & Govil, D. (2007). Management of blood transfusion services in India:
An illustrative study of Maharashtra and Gujarat States. Retrieved from http://vslir.iima.ac.in:8080/jspui/
bitstream/11718/5944/1/2007-03-09_kvramani.pdf
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS, 2.0 (Beta ed). Hamburg, Germany: Academic Press.
Rowe, F., Truex, D., & Huynh, M. Q. (2012). An empirical study of determinants of e-commerce adoption
in SMEs in Vietnam: An economy in transition. Journal of Global Information Management, 20(3), 23–54.
doi:10.4018/jgim.2012070102
Scupola, A. (2003). The adoption of Internet commerce by SMEs in the south of Italy: An environmental,
technological and organizational perspective. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 6(1),
52–71. doi:10.1080/1097198X.2003.10856343
Shih, C. W., & Wang, C. H. (2016). Integrating wireless sensor networks with statistical quality control to develop
a cold chain system in food industries. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 45, 62–78. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2015.12.004
Sinha, A., Kumar, P., Rana, N. P., Islam, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). Impact of internet of things (IoT) in
disaster management: A task-technology fit perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 283(1-2), 759–794.
doi:10.1007/s10479-017-2658-1
Sulaiman, S., Hamid, A. A. K. A., & Yusri, N. A. N. (2015). Development of a blood bank management system.
Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 2008–2013. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.215
Tariq, A., & Akter, S. (2011). An assessment of m-Health in developing countries using task technology fit
model. In AMCIS 2011 Proceedings Association for Information Systems (pp. 1-12). Academic Press.
Taylor, R., Bower, A., Girosi, F., Bigelow, J., Fonkych, K., & Hillestad, R. (2005). Promoting health information
technology: Is there a case for more-aggressive government action? Health Affairs, 24(5), 1234–1245. doi:10.1377/
hlthaff.24.5.1234 PMID:16162568
Tian, F. (2016, June). An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain
technology. In 2016 13th international conference on service systems and service management (ICSSSM) (pp.
1-6). IEEE.
Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). Processes of technological innovation. Lexington
Books.
Tse, D., Zhang, B., Yang, Y., Cheng, C., & Mu, H. (2017, December). Blockchain application in food supply
information security. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering
Management (IEEM) (pp. 1357-1361). IEEE. doi:10.1109/IEEM.2017.8290114
19
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
Turk, Ž., & Klinc, R. (2017). Potentials of blockchain technology for construction management. Procedia
Engineering, 196, 638–645. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.052
UNDP. (2017). UNDP support to the implementation of sustainable development goal 3. Retrieved from http://
www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/Sustainable%20Development/SDG-3%20Health.pdf
Vanduhe, V. Z., Nat, M., & Hasan, H. F. (2020). Continuance Intentions to Use Gamification for Training
in Higher Education: Integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Social Motivation, and Task
Technology Fit (TTF). IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 8, 21473–21484. doi:10.1109/
ACCESS.2020.2966179
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four
longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Verdouw, C. N., Wolfert, J., Beulens, A. J. M., & Rialland, A. (2016). Virtualization of food supply chains with
the internet of things. Journal of Food Engineering, 176, 128–136. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.11.009
Weber, R. H. (2009). Internet of things–Need for a new legal environment? Computer Law & Security Review,
25(6), 522–527. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2009.09.002
Welbourne, E., Battle, L., Cole, G., Gould, K., Rector, K., Raymer, S., Balazinska, M., & Borriello, G. (2009).
Building the internet of things using RFID: The RFID ecosystem experience. IEEE Internet Computing, 13(3),
48–55. doi:10.1109/MIC.2009.52
WHO. (2008). Universal Access to Safe Blood Transfusion. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/
handle/10665/69747
WHO. (2011). Developing a National Blood System. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/entity/bloodsafety/
publications/am_developing_a_national_blood_system.pdf?ua=1
WHO. (2016). The global need for safe blood. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/worldblooddonorday/
campaignkit/WBDD_GlobalNeed_English.pdf
Wong, K. F. (2011). Virtual blood bank. Journal of Pathology Informatics, 2(1), 6. doi:10.4103/2153-3539.76155
PMID:21383930
Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model
(TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221–232. doi:10.1016/j.
chb.2016.10.028
Wu, B., & Zhang, C. Y. (2014). Empirical study on continuance intentions towards ELearning 2.0 systems.
Behaviour & Information Technology, 33(10), 1027e1038.
Xu, W., Lian, Z., & Yao, X. (2013, December). Integrating RFID with blood supply chain: A Technical
and Business Analysis. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering
Management (pp. 1087-1091). IEEE. doi:10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962578
Yadegaridehkordi, E., Iahad, N. A., & Ahmad, N. (2016). Task-technology fit assessment of cloud-based
collaborative learning technologies. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 8(3),
58–73. doi:10.4018/IJISSS.2016070104
Yen, D. C., Wu, C. S., Cheng, F. F., & Huang, Y. W. (2010). Determinants of users’ intention to adopt wireless
technology: An empirical study by integrating TTF with TAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 906–915.
doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.005
20
International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics
Volume 16 • Issue 4
Sachin Kuberkar is currently a research scholar at Symbiosis International University, Pune. His research interests
include emerging technology and has expertise in Blockchain, IoT and Data Analytics. He has over 18 years of
experience in Information Technology industry. He has managed and led many large-scale software programs
for banking, logistics and healthcare clients. He has performed various roles starting from software engineer to
principal consultant in the IT services industry. He has received his Executive MBA degree from Pune University
and BE degree from National Institute of Technology Karnataka.
Tarun Kumar Singhal is presently working as Professor (IT Management) with Symbiosis Centre for Management
Studies, Noida (UP) (Constituent of Symbiosis International University (Deemed), Pune). He is also contributing as
Honorary Member at Centre of Excellence (CoE) in IT Enabled Services (ITES) Vertical established by Tata Institute
of Social Sciences (TISS) School of Vocational Education (SVE), Mumbai. He holds PhD Degree in Business
Administration and master’s degrees in Software Systems as well as Mathematics. He has sound knowledge of
framework for holistic development of professional institutions. He has been involved in number of third party
assignments in the capacity of Consultant for Software Project Management, Establishment & Development
of Institutions of Excellence, Preparation of Feasibility Report for Institutions, Training the Trainers, ISO 9001
System, Team Building & Leadership Development, Web Based Solutions, BPO Operations, Establishment of
Software Development Center and Selection of Competent Personnel. He is associated as member of the board
of referees/reviewers for the Amity Business Review (ABR), Amity Journal of Computational Sciences (AJCS),
Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal (ASTESJ), International Journal of Strategic
Business Alliances (IJSBA).
21