Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Soren Chimal Case

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

 

   
  
ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION FORM  
  
   
Course Name: Statistical Methods for Management Decisions
Assignment Title: Assignment 3 (CCD) 
Submitted by: Individual, Section C 
  
Student Name   PG ID  
Ronit Agarwal 62210384
 
ISB Honour Code   

 I will represent myself in a truthful manner.


 I will not fabricate or plagiarize any information regarding the curriculum.
 I will not seek, receive, or obtain an unfair advantage over other students.
 I will not be party to any violation of the ISB Honour Code.
 I will personally uphold and abide, in theory and practice, the values, purpose and
rules of the ISB Honour Code.
 I will report all violations of the ISB Honour Code by members of the ISB
community.
 I will respect the rights and property of all in the ISB community.
 I will abide by all the rules and regulations that are prescribed by ISB.

(Please start writing your assignment below)  

1
Q1.

Form: The association between store size and


monthly sales can be described with a linear
equation.

Direction: Positive value of corelation ‘r’


indicates a positive association/direction.

Strength: Does the association appear to be


strong, moderately strong, or weak? A high
enough value of ‘r’ indicates that there is a
strong relationship between the store size
and the monthly sales.

2
Q2.

Interpretation:

1. The R2 value is 0.65 which means the model explains about 65% of the variation in our
dependent variable.
2. There is a strong correlation, which does not necessarily mean that there is causation of
one factor because of the other but there is a relation (positive) between the two.
However, because the size of the store intuitively causes greater brand image and
footfall, the bigger size of the store most probably is the cause of higher monthly sales.
3. The root mean square error is low which means that the error is not significant in
reference to our fit line. Also, the data is normally distributed.
4. The p-value of the data is low, which means that we can safely reject our null
hypothesis (there is no causality between the two variables).
5. Covariance is very high which means that the variables are very strongly correlated

Q3.

We can do a hypothesis test to verify our claim. Null


Hypothesis: Ho = the sales are not based on store
size.

Test: p value way less than alpha even at ~99%


confidence so it is safe to assume that the
monthly sales are based on store size.

Q4.

The retail industry wisdom of Rs 500 per month per sq. ft is not applicable to CCD because even
upper 95% of the confidence interval is 498.64 which is less than 500.

Q5.

Predicted Monthly sales (INR) = 32249.334 + 311.0897*Store Size (in Sq. Ft.)

For Store size = 200 sq. ft: Monthly sales (INR) = 32249.334 + 311.0897*200 = 94467.274

3
Similarly, for: 500 sq. ft: Monthly sales (INR) = 32249.334 + 311.0897*500 = 187794.184

Q6.

1. The corelation value between


the store size and monthly sales
is 0.8101 which indicates a
strong relationship between
the two variables.

2. The corelation value between


the monthly sales and predicted
monthly salary is 0.8101 which
is not surprising because the
predicated monthly salary is
the outcome of the fit line.

3. There is a weak correlation


between monthly sales and
residuals monthly sales.

4
5

You might also like