Soren Chimal Case
Soren Chimal Case
Soren Chimal Case
ASSIGNMENT SUBMISSION FORM
Course Name: Statistical Methods for Management Decisions
Assignment Title: Assignment 3 (CCD)
Submitted by: Individual, Section C
Student Name PG ID
Ronit Agarwal 62210384
ISB Honour Code
1
Q1.
2
Q2.
Interpretation:
1. The R2 value is 0.65 which means the model explains about 65% of the variation in our
dependent variable.
2. There is a strong correlation, which does not necessarily mean that there is causation of
one factor because of the other but there is a relation (positive) between the two.
However, because the size of the store intuitively causes greater brand image and
footfall, the bigger size of the store most probably is the cause of higher monthly sales.
3. The root mean square error is low which means that the error is not significant in
reference to our fit line. Also, the data is normally distributed.
4. The p-value of the data is low, which means that we can safely reject our null
hypothesis (there is no causality between the two variables).
5. Covariance is very high which means that the variables are very strongly correlated
Q3.
Q4.
The retail industry wisdom of Rs 500 per month per sq. ft is not applicable to CCD because even
upper 95% of the confidence interval is 498.64 which is less than 500.
Q5.
Predicted Monthly sales (INR) = 32249.334 + 311.0897*Store Size (in Sq. Ft.)
For Store size = 200 sq. ft: Monthly sales (INR) = 32249.334 + 311.0897*200 = 94467.274
3
Similarly, for: 500 sq. ft: Monthly sales (INR) = 32249.334 + 311.0897*500 = 187794.184
Q6.
4
5