Thrombotic Disorders Part 2
Thrombotic Disorders Part 2
Thrombotic Disorders Part 2
Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg;
and National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
Thromboembolic conditions are a leading cause of mortality, estimated to account for 1 in 4 deaths worldwide in 2010. Over time, the
incidence and mortality rates of these conditions have declined in developed countries, but are increasing in developing countries. A delicate
balance exists between procoagulant and anticoagulant factors within the vascular system. Numerous acquired or inherited conditions
may tip the balance either way, i.e. towards a prothrombotic or prohaemorrhagic state. Acquired thrombotic disorders are the subject of
discussion in this issue, the second of a 2-part series on thrombophilia.
Thrombotic disorders may be inherited, as Causes of acquired thrombophilia are listed the antiphospholipid syndrome, heparin-
discussed in part 1 (previous issue),[1] or in Table 1. induced thrombocytopenia and paroxysmal
acquired. They are the subject of discussion A more detailed discussion is given nocturnal haemoglobinuria). Thrombophilia
in this issue, the second of a 2-part series below regarding acquired risk factors associated with specific clinical scenarios
in CME. for thrombosis, as well as information mainly affecting the arterial circulation
The process of coagulation involves pertaining to clinical entities characterised and microvasculature (e.g. myocardial
activation, adhesion and aggregation of by a marked predilection to thrombosis (i.e. infarction, diabetes, hypertension, thrombotic
platelets to damaged endothelium, followed
by deposition and maturation of fibrin, and
begins almost immediately after injury to Clot formation Amplification phase Initiation phase
the endothelial lining of the blood vessel.
Exposure of blood to the subendothelial
(XIIa)
area initiates two processes, viz. changes in IX VII TF
Fibrinolysis
pregnancy. Postpartum thromboprophylaxis should be continued for Furthermore, these agents have been associated with an increased
6 weeks in high-risk women, for 10 days in intermediate-risk women risk of bleeding in patients with gastrointestinal cancers, and should
and at least until discharge from hospital in low-risk women. There is be used with caution in this group.[23] This has led the Scientific and
an increased dose requirement for LMWH during pregnancy because Standardization Committee on Haemostasis and Malignancy of
of increased volume of distribution and renal clearance. Regular anti-Xa the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) to
monitoring is therefore recommended. recommend the use of DOACs only in patients with a low bleeding risk
who do not use agents likely to cause drug-drug interactions.[24] Cancer-
Obesity associated thrombosis should be treated for at least 3 - 6 months, and
Obesity is defined as a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Owing to its increasing as the risk of recurrence is increased, ongoing anticoagulation should
prevalence, obesity has emerged as an important risk factor for VTE be considered while the patient has active cancer.[23]
in addition to myocardial infarction and stroke in high-income Among otherwise apparently well patients who present with
countries. In South Africa (SA), a resource-limited country, there is unprovoked thrombosis, a small proportion can be demonstrated
a bimodal distribution, with a rise in obesity, particularly in urban to be harbouring occult malignancies. Limited cancer screening
settings. Central obesity is characterised by chronic inflammation is therefore recommended by the ISTH in this group of patients,
and impaired fibrinolysis, which are the two major pathways that including a clinical evaluation, chest radiograph, full blood
contribute to VTE risk.[17] count, liver function testing, serum calcium, urinalysis and age-
As obesity is considered a moderate risk factor for VTE in high- appropriate screening tests (e.g. prostate-specific antigen level,
risk circumstances, such as hospitalised medical patients, surgery and mammography).[25] Patients who experience recurrent VTE while
immobilisation, thromboprophylaxis should be considered. Higher on anticoagulant therapy or bilateral deep-vein thrombosis are at
doses of LMWH are often required for the prevention of VTE in particularly high risk of occult cancer, and may benefit from a more
obese patients.[18] Laboratory monitoring of LMWH therapy in obese extensive work-up in the case of underlying malignancy.[20]
patients using anti-Xa levels is indicated. There are limited clinical
data available on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), Sickle cell disease
such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, for patients with a VTE is a common comorbid condition found in sickle cell disease
BMI ≥40 kg/m2. DOAC activity levels should be monitored in these (SCD) and is associated with increased mortality.
patients using a drug-specific peak level.[19] The incidence of thrombotic stroke and pulmonary embolism
is higher than in persons without SCD.[26,27] SCD is also a risk
Cancer factor for pregnancy-related VTE (odds ratio (OR) 20.3).[28] As the
The risk of VTE is significantly increased among patients with pathogenesis of vaso-occlusion is multifactorial, the precise role
cancer, with an estimated relative risk 4 - 7-fold above that of the of hypercoagulability is not certain. The preponderance of evidence
background population.[20] The basis for malignancy-associated demonstrates increased platelet and coagulation activation.
VTE include factors related to the cancer itself (such as expression Prothrombin fragment 1.2, a marker of thrombin generation, is
of procoagulant molecules, particularly TF, by the tumour cells), elevated in SCD. Phosphatidyl serine exposure on the surface of the
chemotherapy-related endothelial injury and/or increased frequency red cell membrane is thought to serve as a trigger, with contributing
of other risks for VTE (e.g. major surgery, immobilisation, vascular factors, such as functional asplenia and nitric oxide depletion due to
obstruction by tumour masses or indwelling venous catheters).[21] chronic haemolysis.[29]
VTE rates are particularly high in certain types of cancer (such as Prophylactic anticoagulation is recommended during potentially
haematological neoplasms, and tumours of the stomach, pancreas, triggering events such as perioperative periods and indwelling venous
brain, lung and breast),[21,22] in advanced-stage disease and when catheters. Meaningful data on the long-term use of anticoagulants
therapeutic agents with increased thrombogenic potential are used, or antiplatelet agents are lacking owing to small and/or poorly
such as platinum-based chemotherapy agents, immunomodulatory controlled studies.
drugs (e.g. thalidamide, tamoxifen) and haemopoietic-stimulating
agents (e.g. erythropoietin).[21,22] Clinical entities characterised by a
Despite the increased risk of VTE in association with cancer, thrombotic tendency
routine primary prophylaxis among ambulatory individuals with a The antiphospholipid syndrome
malignancy is not advocated, as the rate of bleeding complications APS is associated with a predilection to thrombosis and recurrent
is also elevated with LMWH-based VTE prophylaxis.[21,22] However, morbidity related to pregnancy. Thrombosis can affect any vessel
thromboprophylaxis is recommended for hospital inpatients, (arterial, venous or the microvasculature), and recurs often. The
particularly following major surgery, such as abdomenopelvic surgery, pathogenesis of thrombotic APS is not well understood, but the
which necessitates prophylaxis with LMWH for 30 days.[21] Among binding of autoantibodies directed against various phospholipids
patients with confirmed thrombosis, therapeutic doses of LMWH or phospholipid-binding proteins (including cardiolipin and beta-2
have shown superior efficacy compared with oral vitamin K antagonists, glycoprotein I) results in: (i) upregulated monocyte and endothelial
possibly due to difficulties in achieving predictable anticoagulation cell TF expression; (ii) platelet activation; and (iii) disruption of
in patients with cancer owing to numerous drug-drug interactions, natural anticoagulant mechanisms (such as the activated PC pathway
poor diet/vomiting (which can affect vitamin K bio-availability) and the annexin V shield (which blocks access of coagulation
or associated liver/renal impairment.[21] Early indications suggest factors to procoagulant phospholipid surfaces).[30] The most common
that the DOACs, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban (of which thrombotic manifestations include cerebrovascular accidents, lower-
only rivaroxaban is currently available in SA), may be acceptable limb deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.[3] APS should
alternatives for the management of VTE, but caution is warranted if be suspected if:
potent inducers or inhibitors of CYP450 are used concomitantly.[21,23] • thrombosis occurs in a young patient, at an unusual site or recurs[31]
• other clinical features associated with APS are present, including and platelet FIV (PF4), which is an endogenous platelet protein
underlying systemic lupus erythematosus, mild thrombocytopenia, released from the alpha granules of platelets on platelet activation.[33,34]
autoimmune haemolysis, livedo reticularis, cardiac valve When bound to heparin-PF4 complexes, these antibodies cross-link
thickening or vegetations, thrombotic microangiopathy, recurrent FcƔRIIa receptors on platelets and monocytes, which generates
miscarriages, nephropathy, neurological abnormalities or unex a prothrombotic state by triggering platelet activation and TF
plained prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time expression on the surface of monocytes.[34]
(aPTT).[31] These antibodies occur fairly commonly in patients exposed to
heparin, but HIT occurs in only 0.2 - 3.0% of such patients.[34] Factors
The diagnosis is based on the revised Sapporo criteria, which require associated with a high risk of HIT include a history of recent
demonstration of ≥1 laboratory criteria with ≥1 clinical manifestations major surgery, unfractionated heparin (UFH) exposure and use of
(Table 2).[32] The laboratory findings (i.e. anticardiolipin antibodies, therapeutic doses of LMWH.[34] Notably, the risk of HIT is significantly
anti-beta-2 glycoprotein antibodies or a lupus anticoagulant) are lower with prophylactic doses of LMWH.[33,34] Diagnosis is primarily
somewhat nonspecific, and can occur transiently after a viral infection based on clinical suspicion, with the presence of thrombocytopenia
or secondary to underlying autoimmune pathology, malignancy or or thrombosis at the appropriate time interval following heparin
drug exposure. Persistence of these abnormalities must therefore be exposure without an alternative cause (assessed in the 4T score)
demonstrated for >12 weeks with appropriate clinical manifestations (Table 3). HIT can be excluded if the 4T score is low (<4), but requires
before a diagnosis of APS can be made. laboratory confirmation when the score is intermediate or high.[33,34]
Management of thrombotic APS entails lifelong anticoagulation Laboratory tests available in SA include functional tests that detect
with a vitamin K antagonist (such as warfarin and a target platelet activation upon heparin exposure, as well as immunoassays
international normalised ratio (INR) of 2 - 3), with optimisation that demonstrate antiheparin/PF4 antibodies. The immunoassays
of other risk factors for thrombosis (e.g. hypertension, hyper have superior sensitivity, but poorer specificity; therefore, while a
cholesterolaemia). Concomitant use of aspirin is advocated for negative result excludes a diagnosis of HIT, a positive result is only
arterial thrombosis in patients with significant risk factors for confirmatory when the 4T score is high.[34] In contrast, the sensitivity of
cardiovascular disease. In the event of recurrent thrombosis despite the functional assay is lower, but its specificity is higher, and a positive
adequate anticoagulation (a well-described complication), options functional test result therefore confirms a diagnosis of HIT, even in
include the addition of aspirin, use of high-dose vitamin K antagonist patients with an intermediate 4T score.[34] Knowledge regarding the type
therapy (target INR 3 - 4) and/or an alternative anticoagulant of assay performed is important; therefore, consultation with regional
(particularly LMWH). Currently, DOACs are not advocated for the laboratory services is necessary.
management of APS, as their efficacy and safety are not proven.[31] Management of HIT entails immediate cessation of heparin therapy
and commencement of an agent that does not cross-react with the
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antiheparin/PF4 antibodies. Importantly, the results of laboratory
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immunological assays should not be awaited before initiating the alternative
complication of heparin therapy that is associated with a decrease anticoagulant, as the risk of thrombosis is very high (~50%),[33] and
in the platelet count (usually resulting in thrombocytopenia) and an the test results are often not available for a few days. Agents that can
increase in the risk of thrombosis (both venous and arterial).[33,34] It be employed include parenteral inhibitors of thrombin (argatroban),
typically develops 5 - 10 days after the commencement of heparin FXa (fondaparinux) or the DOACs (dabigatran or rivaroxiban).[35]
therapy, except in patients with a history of recent heparin exposure, LMWH should be avoided. Warfarin is contraindicated, as warfarin-
in whom the clinical features may manifest more rapidly. It is caused related PC deficiency may cause significant extension of the
by the production of antibodies directed against a complex of heparin thrombus, with a risk of venous gangrene.[33,34] In the absence
Table 2. Revised Sapporo classification criteria for the diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome[32]
Clinical criteria
Objectively confirmed arterial, venous or small-vessel thrombosis in any organ
Pregnancy morbidity
• ≥1 unexplained death/s of a morphologically normal fetus at or beyond the 10th week of gestation
• ≥1 premature birth/s of a morphologically normal neonate before the 34th week of gestation due to eclampsia, severe pre-eclampsia or
placental insufficiency
• ≥3 unexplained, consecutive spontaneous miscarriages before the 10th week of gestation (without maternal anatomical or paternal and
maternal chromosomal abnormalities)
Laboratory criteria
LA on ≥2 occasions at least 12 weeks apart (detected by prolongation of a phospholipid-dependent clotting time, e.g. DRVVT, lupus-sensitive
aPTT)
ACL antibody (IgG and/or IgM) measured by an ELISA-based immunological assay, present in medium- or high-titre (i.e. ≥40 GPL or MPL),
on ≥2 occasions, at least 12 weeks apart
Anti-β2-glycoprotein I (IgG and/or IgM) measured by an ELISA-based immunological assay, present in medium- or high-titre (i.e. ≥99th percen
tile), on ≥2 occasions, at least 12 weeks apart
Patients with LA positivity are at greater risk of clinical events, particularly those with triple positivity for LA, ACL and anti-β2-glycoprotein I
LA = lupus anticoagulant; DRVVT = dilute Russell viper venom time; aPTT = activated partial thromboplastin time; ACL = anticardiolipin; ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
GPL = IgG phospholipid; MPL = IgM phospholipid.
3. Sud R, Khorana AA. Cancer-associated thrombosis: Risk factors, candidate biomarkers and a risk
Table 5. Wells’ score* for pulmonary embolism model. Thromb Res 2009;123(suppl 4):S18-S21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-3848(09)70137-9
4. Bode M, Mackman N. Regulation of tissue factor gene expression in monocytes and endothelial cells:
Criteria Points Thromboxane A2 as a new player. Vascul Pharmacol 2014;62(2):57-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
vph.2014.05.005
Clinical signs and symptoms of DVT +3 5. Dentan C, Epaulard O, Seynaeve D, Genty C, Bosson JL. Active tuberculosis and venous
PE is the most likely diagnosis or equally likely v. +3 thromboembolism: Association according to international classification of diseases. Clin Infect Dis
2014;58(4):495-501. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit780
another diagnosis 6. Hodkinson KE, Mahlangu JN. Deep-vein thrombosis in the era of high HIV and tuberculosis
prevalence: A prospective review of its diagnosis and treatment in a quaternary centre. S Afr Med J
Heart rate >100/min +1.5 2017;107(10):859-863. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i10.12443
Immobilisation for at least 3 days or surgery in the +1.5 7. Jong E, Louw S, Meijers JC, et al. The hemostatic balance in HIV-infected patients with and without
antiretroviral therapy: Partial restoration with antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Patient Care STDS
previous 4 weeks 2009;23(12):1001-1007. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2009.0173
Previous, objectively diagnosed PE or DVT +1.5 8. Mayne ES, Louw S. Good fences make good neighbors: Human immunodeficiency virus and vascular
disease. Open Forum Infect Dis 2019;6(11):ofz303. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz303
Haemoptysis +1 9. Jacobson BF, Louw S, Buller H, et al. Venous thromboembolism: Prophylactic and therapeutic practice
guideline. S Afr Med J 2013;103(4):260-267. https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.6706
Malignancy with treatment within 6 months or +1 10. Dager WE, Tsu LV, Pon TK. Considerations for systemic anticoagulation in ESRD. Semin Dial
palliation 2015;28(4):354-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/sdi.12376
11. Lutz J, Menke J, Sollinger D, Schinzel H, Thurmel K. Haemostasis in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol
DVT = deep-vein thrombosis; PE = pulmonary embolism. Dial Transplant 2014;29(1):29-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft209
*>6 = high probability; 2 - 6 = moderate probability; <2 = low risk. 12. Giannotta M, Tapete G, Emmi G, Silvestri E, Milla M. Thrombosis in inflammatory bowel diseases:
What’s the link? Thromb J 2015;13:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-015-0044-2
13. Zezos P, Kouklakis G, Saibil F. Inflammatory bowel disease and thromboembolism. World J Gastroenterol
2014;20(38):13863-13878. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13863
14. Stegeman BH, de Bastos M, Rosendaal FR, et al. Different combined oral contraceptives and the risk
phospholipid antibodies (excluding functional lupus anticoagulant), of venous thrombosis: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2013;347:f5298. https://doi.
can be collected in the acute phase of thrombosis, as these results org/10.1136/bmj.f5298
15. Wilkinson H, Trustees, Medical Advisers. Saving mothers’ lives. Reviewing maternal deaths to
are not affected by acute thrombosis or anticoagulants. Functional make motherhood safer: 2006 - 2008. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;118(11):1402-1404. https://doi.
lupus anticoagulant testing, as well as testing for PC and PS and org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03097.x
16. Bates SM, Greer IA, Middeldorp S, et al. VTE, thrombophilia, antithrombotic therapy, and pregnancy:
antithrombin deficiencies, should preferably be delayed until completion Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis. Chest 2012;141(2 Suppl):e691S-e736S. https://
of anticoagulation therapy. However, these can be collected in the acute doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-2300
17. Morange PE, Alessi MC. Thrombosis in central obesity and metabolic syndrome: Mechanisms and
phase prior to initiation of therapy in those patients who might require epidemiology. Thromb Haemost 2013;110(4):669-680. https://doi.org/10.1160/TH13-01-0075
18. Frederiksen SG, Hedenbro JL, Norgren L. Enoxaparin effect depends on body-weight and current
lifelong anticoagulation. doses may be inadequate in obese patients. Br J Surg 2003;90(9):1165-1166.
19. Martin K, Beyer-Westendorf J, Davidson BL, et al. Use of the direct oral anticoagulants in obese
Conclusions patients: Guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2016;14(6):1308-1313. https://doi.
org/10.1111/jth.13323
The aetiology and pathogenesis of acquired thromboses are fairly 20. Timp JF, Braekkan SK, Versteeg HH, Cannegieter SC. Epidemiology of cancer-associated venous
thrombosis. Blood 2013;122(10):1712-1723. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-04-460121
diverse and depend to a large extent on the primary pathology and 21. Fernandes CJ, Morinaga LTK, Alves JL, jun., et al. Cancer-associated thrombosis: The when, how and
why. Eur Respir Rev 2019;28(151):pii180119. https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0119-2018
associated compounding factors. 22. Streiff MB. Thrombosis in the setting of cancer. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program
An accurate history (with knowledge of pre-existing conditions), 2016;2016(1):196-205. https://doi.org/10.1182/asheducation-2016.1.196
23. Kraaijpoel N, Carrier M. How I treat cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Blood
physical examination and appropriate investigations are imperative 2019;133(4):291-298. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-08-835595
for proper diagnosis and management of acquired thrombophilia. 24. Khorana AA, Noble S, Lee AYY, et al. Role of direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of cancer
associated venous thromboembolism: Guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost
2018;16(9):1891-1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14219
25. Delluc A, Antic D, Lecumberri R, Ay C, Meyer G, Carrier M. Occult cancer screening in patients with
venous thromboembolism: Guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2017;15(10):2076-2079.
Declaration. None. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.13791
26. Lijfering WM, Brouwer JL, Veeger NJ, et al. Selective testing for thrombophilia in patients with first
Acknowledgements. None. venous thrombosis: Results from a retrospective family cohort study on absolute thrombotic risk for
currently known thrombophilic defects in 2 479 relatives. Blood 2009;113(21):5314-5322. https://doi.
Author contributions. NAA: concept, design and content; JV: design and org/10.1182/blood-2008-10-184879
content; SL: content; ES: content; and BJ: content. 27. Spencer FA, Emery C, Joffe SW, et al. Incidence rates, clinical profile, and outcomes of patients with
venous thromboembolism. The Worcester VTE study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2009;28(4):401-409.
Funding. None. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-009-0378-3
28. Noubiap JJ, Temgoua MN, Tankeu R. Sickle cell disease, sickle trait and the risk for venous thromboembolism:
Conflicts of interest. None. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb J 2018;16:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-018-0179-z
29. De Franceschi L, Cappellini MD, Olivieri O. Thrombosis and sickle cell desease. Semin Thromb
Hemost 2011;37(3):226-236. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1273087
1. Alli NA, Vaughan J, Louw S, Schapkaitz E, Jacobson B. Thrombotic disorders (part 1). S Afr Med J 30. Linnemann B. Antiphospholipid syndrome – an update. Vasa 2018;47(6):451-464. https://doi.
2020;110(2):83-87. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i2.14594 org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000723
2. Gale AJ. Current understanding of hemostasis. Toxicol Pathol 2011;39(1):273-280. https://doi. 31. Garcia D, Erkan D. Diagnosis and management of the antiphospholipid syndrome. N Engl J Med
org/10.1177/0192623310389474 2018;379(13):1290. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1808253
32. Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, et al. International consensus statement on an update of the 36. Luzzatto L. Recent advances in the pathogenesis and treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal
classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost 2006;4(2):295-306. hemoglobinuria. F1000Res 2016;5:pii. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7288.1
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01753.x 37. Hill A, Kelly RJ, Hillmen P. Thrombosis in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. Blood
33. Greinacher A. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med 2015;373(19):1883-1884. 2013;121(25):4985-4996,5105. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-09-311381
34. Arepally GM. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood 2017;129(21):2864-2872. https://doi. 38. Tritschler T, Kraaijpoel N, le Gal G, Wells PS. Venous thromboembolism: Advances in diagnosis and
org/10.1056/NEJMc1510993 treatment. JAMA 2018;320(15):1583-1594. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.14346
35. Cuker A, Arepally GM, Chong BH, et al. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for
management of venous thromboembolism: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv
2018;2(22):3360-3392. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024489 Accepted 31 January 2020.