Lecture 1
Lecture 1
Lecture 1
Zainab Alkaissi
Lecture 1 2022-2023
Introduction
A model is a simplified representation of a part of the real world–the system of interest–which
focuses on certain elements considered important from a particular point of view. Models are,
therefore, problem and viewpoint specific.
Transport models are a systematic representation of the complex real-world transport and land use
system as it exists. They are powerful tools for assessing the impact of transport infrastructure
options and for identifying how the transport system is likely to perform in the future, which is
essential for the development of effective urban planning practice.
The development and application of transport models are fundamental to the appraisal of many
transport initiatives because they:
Provide an analytical framework to assess existing demands on the transport system and
project future demands to systematically test the impact of transport and land use options.
Enable the generation of quantitative measures to provide key indicators in the business
case assessment and economic appraisal.
A model is not only about having as accurate a model as possible, it is also about usefulness.
At the most fundamental level, transport models comprise:
A demand model (trip generation, trip distribution, mode choice, and time of travel).
A highway assignment model (road-based public transport, private vehicles, freight, and
other commercial vehicles).
A rail, bus, and ferry assignment model (public transport and freight).
A Statement of Requirements
A Functional Specification of the transport model
A Technical Specification of the transport model.
A good transport system widens the opportunities to satisfy these needs; a heavily congested
poorly connected system restricts options and limits economic and social development.
Ph.D. Course Transportation Modeling Prof. Dr. Zainab Alkaissi
Lecture 1 2022-2023
that a transport system could cope well with the average demand for travel in an area but that it
breaks down during peak periods. Several techniques exist to try to spread the peak and average
the load on the system: flexible working hours, staggering working times, premium pricing, and
so on. However, peak and off-peak variations in demand remain a central, and fascinating, problem
in transport modeling and planning.
The management system may also be used to redistribute capacity giving priority to certain types
of users over others, either on efficiency (public-transport users, cyclists), environmental (electric
vehicles), or equity grounds (pedestrians).
As in the case of most goods and services, one would expect the level of demand D to be dependent
on the level of service provided by the transport system and also on the allocation of activities A
over space:
D = f {S, A} 3
Combining equations (1) and (3) for a fixed activity system one would find the set of equilibrium
points between supply and demand for transport. But then again, the activity system itself would
probably change as levels of service change over space and time. Therefore one would have two
different sets of equilibrium points: short-term and long-term ones. The task of transport planning
is to forecast and manage the evolution of these equilibrium points over time so that social welfare
is maximized. This is, of course, not a simple task: modeling these equilibrium points should help
to understand this evolution better and assist in the development and implementation of
management strategies M and investment programs I.
Sometimes very simple cause-effect relationships can be depicted graphically to help understand
the nature of some transport problems. A typical example is the car/public-transport vicious circle
depicted in Figure 3.
Economic growth provides the first impetus to increase car ownership. More car owners mean
more people wanting to transfer from public transport to car; this, in turn, means fewer public-
transport passengers, to which operators may respond by increasing the fares, reducing the
frequency (level of service), or both. These measures make the use of cars even more attractive
than before and induce more people to buy cars, thus accelerating the vicious circle. After a few
cycles (years) car drivers are facing increased levels of congestion; buses are delayed, are
becoming increasingly more expensive, and running less frequently; the accumulation of sensible
individual decisions results in a final state in which almost everybody is worse off than originally.
Moreover, there is a more insidious effect in the long term, not depicted in Figure 3, as car owners
choose their place of work and residence without considering the availability (or otherwise) of
public transport. This generates urban sprawl, and low-density developments that are more
difficult and expensive to serve by more efficient public transport modes. This is the ‘development
trap’ that leads to further congestion and a higher proportion of our time spent in slow-moving
cars.
This simple representation can also help to identify what can be done to slow down or reverse this
vicious circle. These ideas are summarized in Figure 4. Physical measures like bus lanes or other
bus-priority schemes are particularly attractive as they also result in a more efficient allocation of
road space. Public transport subsidies have strong advocates and detractors; they may reduce the
need for fare increases, at least in the short term, but tend to generate large deficits and protect
poor management from the consequences of their own inefficiency. Car restraint, and in particular
congestion charging, can help to internalize externalities and generate a revenue stream that can
be distributed to other areas of need in transportation.
Ph.D. Course Transportation Modeling Prof. Dr. Zainab Alkaissi
Lecture 1 2022-2023
are being developed that can indicate the implications of transportation planning actions for spatial
changes. Such model applications are important for the calculation of:
transport flows that are consistent with projections of population and employment;
impacts of bottlenecks in the road network on spatial developments;
the influence a good public transport policy can have to counteract further desurbanization
of the big cities.