Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Issues-Memorandum, Republic vs. Cortes

    Uploaded by

    Don Villegas
    The document discusses two procedural issues and one substantive issue regarding a case. Specifically, it discusses whether the case should be dismissed due to mootness after the main case was dismissed. It also discusses whether the petitioner waived arguments by voluntarily submitting to the court's jurisdiction. Finally, it discusses whether there was grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction by the judges in consolidating the cases and proceeding with the consolidated case.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Issues-Memorandum, Republic vs. Cortes

    Uploaded by

    Don Villegas
    9 views2 pages
    The document discusses two procedural issues and one substantive issue regarding a case. Specifically, it discusses whether the case should be dismissed due to mootness after the main case was dismissed. It also discusses whether the petitioner waived arguments by voluntarily submitting to the court's jurisdiction. Finally, it discusses whether there was grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction by the judges in consolidating the cases and proceeding with the consolidated case.

    Original Title

    ISSUES-MEMORANDUM, REPUBLIC VS. CORTES

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses two procedural issues and one substantive issue regarding a case. Specifically, it discusses whether the case should be dismissed due to mootness after the main case was dismissed. It also discusses whether the petitioner waived arguments by voluntarily submitting to the court's jurisdiction. Finally, it discusses whether there was grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction by the judges in consolidating the cases and proceeding with the consolidated case.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    9 views2 pages

    Issues-Memorandum, Republic vs. Cortes

    Uploaded by

    Don Villegas
    The document discusses two procedural issues and one substantive issue regarding a case. Specifically, it discusses whether the case should be dismissed due to mootness after the main case was dismissed. It also discusses whether the petitioner waived arguments by voluntarily submitting to the court's jurisdiction. Finally, it discusses whether there was grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of jurisdiction by the judges in consolidating the cases and proceeding with the consolidated case.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    1. PROCEDURAL.

    A. WHETHER PETITIONER REPUBLIC’S INSTANT


    CERTIORARI AND PROHIBITION CASE FOR ALLEGED
    VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS BY RESPONDENT HON.
    PRESIDING JUDGE CORTES OF BRANCH 271, RTC,
    TAGUIG CITY, IN THE CONDUCT OF THE HEARING OF
    THE MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION AND THE
    EVENTUAL ISSUANCE OF THE (INTERLOCUTORY)
    ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION IN CIVIL CASE NO. 406,
    AND FOR ALLEGED LACK OF JURISDICTION OF
    RESPONDENT HON. PRESIDING JUDGE REYES OF
    BRANCH 70, RTC, TAGUIG CITY, OVER CIVIL CASE NO.
    406, WHICH WAS CONSOLIDATED WITH CIVIL CASE
    NO. 231 PENDING IN THE LATTER’S SAID BRANCH,
    SHOULD BE DISMISSED FOR MOOTNESS DUE TO THE
    DISMISSAL OF PETITIONER REPUBLIC’S MAIN CASE
    FOR CANCELLATION OF TITLE AND/OR REVERSION IN
    CIVIL CASE NO. 406.
    B. WHETHER PETITIONER REPUBLIC’S GROUND OF
    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS BY
    RESPONDENT HON. PRESIDING JUDGE CORTES OF
    BRANCH 271, RTC, TAGUIG CITY IN CIVIL CASE NO.
    406, AND LACK OF JURISDICTION BY RESPONDENT
    HON. PRESIDING JUDGE REYES OF BRANCH 70, RTC,
    TAGUIG CITY, TO HEAR THE CONSOLIDATED CIVIL
    CASE NO. 406 WITH CIVIL CASE NO. 231, WAS
    ALREADY WAIVED BY PETITIONER REPUBLIC’S
    VOLUNTARY SUBMISSION TO THE JURISDICTION OF
    BRANCH 70, RTC, TAGUIG CITY WHICH HEARD AND
    DECIDED CIVIL CASE NO. 406.

    II. SUBSTANTIVE.
    C. WHETHER GRAVE ABUSE OF DISCRETION AMOUNTING
    TO LACK OR EXCESS OF JURISDICTION WAS
    COMMITTED BY-
    C.1. RESPONDENT HON. PRESIDING JUDGE CORTES, IN
    THE CONDUCT OF THE HEARING OF THE MOTION FOR
    CONSOLIDATION AND IN THE ISSUANCE OF THE
    ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION; AND
    C.2. RESPONDENT HON. PRESIDING JUDGE REYES, IN
    PROCEEDING WITH THE HEARING OF THE
    CONSOLIDATED CIVIL CASE NO. 406 IN THE ABSENCE
    OF A TRO OR INJUNCTION FROM THE HONORABLE
    COURT.

    You might also like