TD Construction in Indo Compatibility Mode

11/12/2014
Jakarta, the Capital of Indonesia
http://www.davysukamta.com
News / Articles
TERIMA KASIH
Principal, DS&P
DAVYSUKAMTA & PARTNERS, Structural Engineers DAVYSUKAMTA & PARTNERS, Structural Engineers DAVYSUKAMTA & PARTNERS, Structural Engineers
Complex Basement Construction in Very Congested Urban Environtment

DEEP BASEMENT
IN DENSE URBAN CONDITION
Design Consideration:
- Depth of Excavation
- Type of Soil
- Water Table
- Adjacent Structure / Site Constraints
- Sequence of Works
- Excavation Methodology
Complex Basement Construction in Very Congested Urban Environtment - Construction Details
Use of RC Slab as Struts
Use of RC slab as strut gives the required

SUPPORT
rigid support for the diaphragm wall
Work progressed simultaneously for the
Top-Down Semi Top-Down basement and the super-structure, saving
Construction Construction
construction time
TDC enables the superstructure Semi TDC makes use of the
and the underground structure stiff RC slab as struts, starting Design MUST reflect the actual sequence of
to be built simultaneously the construction from the
GROUND ANCHOR
ground to the bottom
work. DETAILING is tedious and complex
STRUT : Steel or RC slab (top down)
1
11/12/2014
Top-Down Construction The Key Component
Construction Method
Where to install the 1st slab
Sequence of
Work
Choice of
LL for Working Platform Depends on
King-Post
Equipment And Method of Work
Strutting
System
Installing the Kingpost
Load Path
Casting Concrete under the Slab
Connect RC Slab to Kingpost
Steel Rebar Passing Through Kingpost
Soil Removal: Skip Floor or Not? Construction Holes?
Soil Removal
Soil Removal
DAVYSUKAMTA & PARTNERS, Structural Engineers DAVYSUKAMTA & PARTNERS, Structural Engineers
WTC-2
Mosque
Basement is located very close to adjacent WTC-2,

5-level basement Wisma Metropolitan 1, Mosque and future WTC-4.
Dense urban location Excavation reached 15.8 meters
Wisma Metropolitan 1 +
Deformation of the retaining structure must be
WTC-2 + Mosque are
close to the basement minimized to avoid damaging adjacent structures
Depth of excavation 16 M
Not possible to install ground anchors
Semi Top-Down
Construction WM-1 Limited access and space for work
2
11/12/2014
WM-1
115 piles φ1500mm

with kingpost
Bored-piles φ1200 mm
without kingpost
WTC-2
Stress S22 Diagram: Effect of soil pressure and openings on RC slab

Strutting
the Hole Temporary Ramp for Construction
Check the Stress in the Slab

Due to Soil Pressure and
Construction Opening
COMPRESSION TENSION
3
11/12/2014
Connection Detail:
The Details Kingpost to Slab
Use of CAD/CAM
to help the Design Process
Work on Progress:
Preparation Work for B-1 Slab
(Working Platform)
Welding Quality Inspection
Shear Stud Quality Assurance
Case Study No.2: Plaza Indonesia Extension

48-story + 5-level basement, 220,000 sq.m, completed in 2009
Basement is located very close to adjacent Grand

Hyatt hotel, e-X center and Japanese Embassy, and
excavation reached 17 meters
Project High water table, 1.5 – 2.0 meters below the surface
Location
Deformation of the retaining structure must be

minimized to avoid damaging adjacent structures
Limited Construction time and space for work
4
11/12/2014
Use of RC slab as strut gives the required

-Use RC slab as strut
-Work simultaneously Top-Down Construction rigid support for the diaphragm wall
upwards and downwards
Work progressed simultaneously for the
basement and the super-structure, saving
11 month’s construction time
The Ground floor was designed
for LL = 2000kg/sq.m (20kPa)
On completion of B-5 level, work on
to take construction load superstructure had reached level-11
Use of metal formwork for precision and speed of construction
Use of weldable coupler

Dye Penetrant Test
to Check Weld Quality
Holes for steel rebar
5
11/12/2014
Foundation of Tower Crane
Pipes for concrete casting
Analysis and design of D-wall, king-posts

and supporting bored-piles
must follow construction sequence
High capacity king-post and bored pile

is required to take the construction load
before the RC mat is poured and
steel king-post encased in concrete
Horizontal Deflection Bending Moment Shear Force "A"-side : Adjacent to Existing Plaza Indonesia (Without Temporary Strut)
Horizontal Deflection Bending Moment Shear Force
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Excav. To 3.7m (EL. -0.35m)
-5 -5 -5
-5 -5 -5
-5 Bending Moment
-10 -10 -10 B1 and Excav. To 6.7m (-3.35m)
-10 -10 -10 Min ≅ -63.5 ton.m/m
-10
Max ≅ 64.0 ton.m/m
-15 -15 -15
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
B2 and Excav. To 9.7m (-6.35m)
-15 -15 -15
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
-20 -20 -20

-15
Depth (m)
-20 -20 -20 B3 and Excav. To 12.7m (-9.35m)
-25 -25 -25

-25 -25 -25 -20 B4 and Excav. To 14.2m (-10.85m)
-30 -30 -30

-30 -30 -30
Excav. To 15.85m (-12.5m)
-25
-35 -35 -35
-35 -35 -35 -20 0 20 40 60 -100 -50 0 50 100 -50 -25 0 25 50
-20 0 20 40 60 -100 -50 0 50 100 -50 -25 0 25 50 Mat (t=2.5m)
Horizontal Deflection (m m ) Bending Mom ent (ton.m /m) Shear Force (ton/m ) -30
Horizontal Deflection (m m) Bending M oment (ton.m /m ) Shear For ce (ton/m)
Excav. To 15.85m (-12.5m) Excav. To 15.85m (-12.5m) Excav. To 15.85m (-12.5m)
Excav. To 3.7m (EL. -0.35m) Excav. To 3.7m (EL. -0.35m) Excav. To 3.7m (EL. -0.35m) GWL Recovery
Mat (t=2.5m) Mat (t=2.5m) Mat (t=2.5m)
-35
B1 and Excav. To 6.7m (-3.35m) B1 and Excav. To 6.7m (-3.35m) B1 and Excav. To 6.7m (-3.35m)
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
D-Wall Bending Moment (ton.m/m )
6
11/12/2014
Site Condition – Oct.2006
Adjacent to Existing Plaza Indonesia Adjacent to Exist. Plz. Indo.

[Excavation depth = 16m]
0 0
-5 -5
-10 -10
-15 -15
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
-20 -20
1st
Step
-25
-25
-30
-30
Final
Step
-35
-35
0 10 20 30 40 50
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80
D-Wall Horz. Deflection (mm )
Envelope of D-Wall Be nding Mom ent (ton.m /m )
Adjacent to Jln. Thamrin Adjacent to Jln. Thamrin

[Excavation Depth = 14.5m ]
0 0
-5 -5
-10 -10
-15 -15
Depth (m)
Depth (m)
1st
-20 -20 Step
-25 -25
Final
-30 -30
Step
IA-1 IB-3
-35 -35
-80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 0 10 20 30 40 50
Envelope of D-Wall Bending Mom ent (ton.m/m ) D-Wall Horz. Deflection (m m)

7
11/12/2014
Jan2008
8
11/12/2014
Case Study No.3

MENARA BANK MEGA
JAKARTA
26-story, 4-level basement

Semi Top-Down Construction
Skip-floor method
Completed in 2006
Construction of Secant Pile,

Bored-Pile and Kingpost
Installation of King-Post
TAHAP 1
9
11/12/2014
Construction of Level B-1/

Working Platform
Use Level B-1 as Working Platform TAHAP 2
Excavation under B-1 Slab
Excavation to B-3 Level:

Skip Floor Method
TAHAP 3
Work on Level B-3
Starter Bars
10
11/12/2014
Steel Ramp for Access
Strutting
the Hole
Completion of B-4 level
TAHAP 4 Excavation Work Under B-

B- 3 Slab
11
11/12/2014
Use of Chemical Anchors as Dowels

Transfer of Force by Shear-Friction
Galian Tanah P3 Galian Tanah P3 dan Opening LG+P2
Casting of mat foundation

+ 3240 m3 in 36 hours
Constructing the B-2 Level:

Inserting the RC Slab
Preparation for mat Foundation
TAHAP 5
12
11/12/2014
Constructing the B-2 Slab
Use of Chemical Anchors as Dowels

Transfer of Force by Shear-Friction
Excavation P2-P3 (B-3 s/d

Soil Excavation Under LG (B-1) Excavation LG-P2 B-4) dan Mat Foundation
= 16,000 m3 Completed in 65 Days
(B-1 to B-3) = 25,200 m3
Completed in 76 Days
Main Issue: Exercise care for Kingpost Completed in 48 Days Final Work by Manual
Excavation
Completed Project, 2006
13

TD Construction in Indo Compatibility Mode

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TD Construction in Indo Compatibility Mode

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

TD Construction in Indo Compatibility Mode

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

11/12/2014

Jakarta, the Capital of Indonesia

Complex Basement Construction in Very Congested Urban Environtment

Use of RC Slab as Struts

Use of RC slab as strut gives the required

Top-Down Construction The Key Component

Basement is located very close to adjacent WTC-2,

115 piles φ1500mm

Stress S22 Diagram: Effect of soil pressure and openings on RC slab

Check the Stress in the Slab

Welding Quality Inspection

Shear Stud Quality Assurance

Case Study No.2: Plaza Indonesia Extension

Basement is located very close to adjacent Grand

Deformation of the retaining structure must be

Limited Construction time and space for work

Use of RC slab as strut gives the required

Use of metal formwork for precision and speed of construction

Use of weldable coupler

Foundation of Tower Crane

Pipes for concrete casting

Analysis and design of D-wall, king-posts

High capacity king-post and bored pile

-20 -20 -20

-25 -25 -25

-30 -30 -30

Site Condition – Oct.2006

Adjacent to Existing Plaza Indonesia Adjacent to Exist. Plz. Indo.

Adjacent to Jln. Thamrin Adjacent to Jln. Thamrin

Envelope of D-Wall Bending Mom ent (ton.m/m ) D-Wall Horz. Deflection (m m)

Case Study No.3

26-story, 4-level basement

Construction of Secant Pile,

Construction of Level B-1/

Use Level B-1 as Working Platform TAHAP 2

Excavation under B-1 Slab

Excavation to B-3 Level:

Work on Level B-3

Steel Ramp for Access

Completion of B-4 level

TAHAP 4 Excavation Work Under B-

Use of Chemical Anchors as Dowels

Galian Tanah P3 Galian Tanah P3 dan Opening LG+P2

Casting of mat foundation

Constructing the B-2 Level:

Preparation for mat Foundation

Constructing the B-2 Slab

Use of Chemical Anchors as Dowels

Excavation P2-P3 (B-3 s/d

Completed Project, 2006

You might also like