Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 765 views

    20th Century Fox V CA

    Uploaded by

    Harry Gwynn Omar Fernan
    The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision to lift three search warrants issued to the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) for a raid on video outlets suspected of film piracy. The lower court found that the NBI and witnesses misrepresented that they had personal knowledge of any piracy, when they did not. For a search warrant on copyright infringement, the applicant must present evidence linking the copyrighted films to the allegedly pirated films to demonstrate probable cause. Mere allegations are not enough. As the NBI did not provide this evidence, the lower court properly lifted the warrants for lack of probable cause.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    20th Century Fox V CA

    Uploaded by

    Harry Gwynn Omar Fernan
    765 views2 pages
    The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision to lift three search warrants issued to the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) for a raid on video outlets suspected of film piracy. The lower court found that the NBI and witnesses misrepresented that they had personal knowledge of any piracy, when they did not. For a search warrant on copyright infringement, the applicant must present evidence linking the copyrighted films to the allegedly pirated films to demonstrate probable cause. Mere allegations are not enough. As the NBI did not provide this evidence, the lower court properly lifted the warrants for lack of probable cause.

    Original Title

    20th Century Fox v CA

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision to lift three search warrants issued to the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) for a raid on video outlets suspected of film piracy. The lower court found that the NBI and witnesses misrepresented that they had personal knowledge of any piracy, when they did not. For a search warrant on copyright infringement, the applicant must present evidence linking the copyrighted films to the allegedly pirated films to demonstrate probable cause. Mere allegations are not enough. As the NBI did not provide this evidence, the lower court properly lifted the warrants for lack of probable cause.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    765 views2 pages

    20th Century Fox V CA

    Uploaded by

    Harry Gwynn Omar Fernan
    The Supreme Court upheld the lower court's decision to lift three search warrants issued to the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) for a raid on video outlets suspected of film piracy. The lower court found that the NBI and witnesses misrepresented that they had personal knowledge of any piracy, when they did not. For a search warrant on copyright infringement, the applicant must present evidence linking the copyrighted films to the allegedly pirated films to demonstrate probable cause. Mere allegations are not enough. As the NBI did not provide this evidence, the lower court properly lifted the warrants for lack of probable cause.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    20th Century Fox v CA

    Date (19 August 1988) | Ponente: Gutierrez Jr.

    Overview: Search warrants were recalled because the NBI and witnesses misrepresented that they had personal knowledge of the piracy. Statement of the Case - The lower court later on lifted the 3 search warrants and ordered the NBI to return the properties that were seized. - CA dismissed MRs. Statement of Facts - August 26, 1985: a letter-complaint by petitioner 20thCentury Fox Film Corporation through counsel sought the National Bureau of Investigation's (NBI) assistance in the conduct of searches and seizures in connection with the latter's anti-film piracy campaign. - Specifically, the letter-complaint alleged that certain videotape outlets all over Metro Manila are engaged in the unauthorized sale and renting out of copyrighted films in videotape form which constitute a flagrant violation of Presidential Decree No. 49(otherwise known as the Decree on the Protection of Intellectual Property). - Acting on the letter-complaint, the NBI conductedsurveillance and investigation of the outlets pinpointed bythe petitioner and subsequently filed three (3) applicationsfor search warrants. - September 4, 1985: the lower court issued the desired search warrants. - The NBI accompanied by the petitioner's agents, raided the video outlets and seized the items described therein. - An inventory of the items seized was made and left with the private respondents. - The lower court later on lifted the 3 search warrants and ordered the NBI to return the properties that were seized. Applicable Laws: Section 2, Article Ill, 1987 Constitution. Issues: 1. Was there grave abuse of discretion on the part of the lower court when it lifted the search warrants it earlier issued against the private respondents? No. Rationale 1. In the instant case, the lower court lifted the three questioned search warrants against the private respondents on the ground that it acted on the application for the issuance of the said search warrants and granted it on the misrepresentations of applicant NBI and its witnesses that infringement of copyright or a piracy of a particular film have been committed - As found out by the court, the NBI agents who acted as witnesses did not have personal knowledge of the subject matter of their testimony which was the alleged commission of the offense by the private respondents. - Only the petitioner's counsel who was also a witness during the application for the issuance of the search warrants stated that he had personal knowledge that the confiscated tapes owned by the private respondents were pirated tapes taken from master tapes belonging to the petitioner. However, the lower court did not give much credence to his testimony in view of the fact that the master tapes of the allegedly pirated tapes were not shown to the court during the application. - The essence of a copyright infringement is the similarity or at least substantial similarity of the purported pirated works to the copyrighted work. Hence, the applicant must present to the court the copyrighted films to compare them with the purchased evidence of the video tapes allegedly pirated to determine whether the latter is an unauthorized reproduction of the former. This linkage of the copyrighted films to the pirated films must be established to satisfy the requirements of probable cause. Mere

    allegations as to the existence of the copyrighted films cannot serve as basis for the issuance of a search warrant. - Search warrant must contain a specific description of the articles to be seized. General warrants are constitutionally objectionable. Judgment: Petition dismissed.

    You might also like