Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 55 views

    Sandeep Kohar

    Uploaded by

    kailash chand
    1. The applicant was dismissed from service by the Disciplinary Authority and challenged this in the High Court through a writ petition that was disposed of, leaving the applicant with alternative remedies. 2. The applicant then filed an appeal with the Appellate Authority over four months ago but no decision had been made. 3. The Tribunal disposed of the application with directions for the Appellate Authority to decide the pending appeal within two months, affording the applicant an opportunity to be heard.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Sandeep Kohar

    Uploaded by

    kailash chand
    55 views3 pages
    1. The applicant was dismissed from service by the Disciplinary Authority and challenged this in the High Court through a writ petition that was disposed of, leaving the applicant with alternative remedies. 2. The applicant then filed an appeal with the Appellate Authority over four months ago but no decision had been made. 3. The Tribunal disposed of the application with directions for the Appellate Authority to decide the pending appeal within two months, affording the applicant an opportunity to be heard.

    Original Title

    Sandeep kohar

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1. The applicant was dismissed from service by the Disciplinary Authority and challenged this in the High Court through a writ petition that was disposed of, leaving the applicant with alternative remedies. 2. The applicant then filed an appeal with the Appellate Authority over four months ago but no decision had been made. 3. The Tribunal disposed of the application with directions for the Appellate Authority to decide the pending appeal within two months, affording the applicant an opportunity to be heard.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    55 views3 pages

    Sandeep Kohar

    Uploaded by

    kailash chand
    1. The applicant was dismissed from service by the Disciplinary Authority and challenged this in the High Court through a writ petition that was disposed of, leaving the applicant with alternative remedies. 2. The applicant then filed an appeal with the Appellate Authority over four months ago but no decision had been made. 3. The Tribunal disposed of the application with directions for the Appellate Authority to decide the pending appeal within two months, affording the applicant an opportunity to be heard.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    1- O.A. No.

    060/01000/2021

    CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


    CHANDIGARH BENCH

    Hearing by Video Conferencing

    O.A. No.060/01000/2021

    Chandigarh, this the 27th day of August 2021

    HON’BLE SH. SURESH KUMAR MONGA, MEMBER (J)


    (Through video conference from Central Administrative Tribunal
    Chandigarh Bench)
    HON’BLE SH. RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA, MEMBER (A)
    (Through video conference from Central Administrative Tribunal
    Bangalore Bench)

    Sandeep Singh @ Sandeep age 27 years son of Sh. Nawab


    Singh, resident of Village and P.O. Kiloi Dopana, Tehsil and
    Distt. Rohtak and ex-sorting Assistant, HRO RMS D Division,
    Nanakpura New Delhi Hisar.
    ....Applicant
    (BY: Sh. Jasbir Mor, Advocate)

    Versus
    1. Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of
    Communication and Information Technology, Department of
    Posts, Headquarter, Dak Bhawan, Sansad Marg, New Delhi.
    2. Appellate Authority-cum-the Postmaster General, Haryana
    Circle, Ambala, Distt. Ambala, Haryana.
    3. Superintendent RMS, D Division, Nanakpura, New Delhi.
    4. Inquiry Officer cum Superintendent of Foreign Post, Indian
    Postal Service, New Delhi.
    ... .Respondents
    O R D E R(Oral)

    Per: SURESH KUMAR MONGA, MEMBER (J):

    1. Aggrieved by an order dated 20.09.2019 (Annexure A-6) vide

    which the Disciplinary Authority inflicted a penalty of


    2- O.A. No.060/01000/2021

    dismissal from service upon the applicant, the applicant

    preferred a Civil Writ Petition No. 30055/2019 before the

    Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The said Writ

    Petition was, however, disposed of vide order dated

    05.01.2021 by the Hon’ble High Court and the applicant was

    relegated to the alternative remedies available to him. The

    Letters Patent Appeal No. 269/2021 (O&M) filed by the

    applicant against the said order was also dismissed on

    08.03.2021 by a Division Bench of the Hon’ble High Court.

    2. Pursuant thereto, the applicant preferred an appeal before

    the Chief Postmaster General, Haryana Circle, Ambala on

    16.04.2021.

    3. Grievance of the applicant herein is that a period of more

    than four months has elapsed, but uptill now no decision has

    been taken over his appeal by the Chief Postmaster General

    Haryana Circle, Ambala.

    4. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant

    will be satisfied if the present Original Application is disposed

    of with a direction to the Appellate Authority to decide his

    pending appeal within a time-frame.

    5. Keeping in view the afore-stated limited prayer made by

    learned counsel for the applicant, we deem it appropriate to

    dispose of the present Original Application, at the admission

    stage itself, without entering into the merits of the case.


    3- O.A. No.060/01000/2021

    6. Accordingly, the Original Application is disposed of with a

    direction to the Chief Postmaster General, Haryana Circle,

    Ambala, to decide the applicant’s pending appeal dated

    16.04.2021 and pass a reasoned and speaking order in

    accordance with law. Before taking such a decision, the

    applicant shall also be afforded an opportunity of hearing.

    The whole exercise shall be undertaken within a period of two

    months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this

    order.

    7. Ordered accordingly. However, there shall be no order so as

    to costs.

    (RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA) (SURESH KUMAR MONGA)


    MEMBER (A) MEMBER (J)

    ‘mw’

    You might also like