7739 14817 1 SM
7739 14817 1 SM
7739 14817 1 SM
1 • 2017 • 70-85
70
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
Kata kunci: Keberlanjutan, sumber daya manusia, kinerja organisasi, model I4C
71
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
72
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
73
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
74
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
75
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
Table 3.1. Objectives of the study and the related research question and hypotheses
for business sustainability role for HRM
76
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
77
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
Cmin/DF: 1.846; GFI 0.988; AGFI: 0.954; CFI: 0.997; RMR: 0.46; RMSE: 0.060
Standard Criteria for model fit statistics (Wu, 2005; Hair et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2012)
Cmin/DF < = 3; GFI; AGFI; CFI>0.9; RMR<0.05; RMSE<0.08
Figure 5.1. SEM model showing the association of HRM strategic integration in
formulation and implementation of sustainability strategy in business
78
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
Figure 5.2. SEM model showing the impact of HRM strategic integration in
sustainability strategy and the people, planet, and profit factors of the organizational
performance in business
latent variables, SEM offers a better ratio (CR) of the regression estimate
alternative to traditional multiple (Byrne, 2001). Thus, CR values greater
regression tests of mediation. than or equal to 2.58 indicate a 99%
level of significance. Accordingly,
The standardized regression estimate we report that HRM strategic
presented in the Table 5.2 allowed us to integration in sustainability strategy
examine the direct association between (HRM_SI) has positive significance
the constructs. We note that the level on the organizational performance
of significance is based on the critical constructs: people, planet, and profit.
79
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
80
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
81
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
Other studies, too, have confirmed The results of this study reaffirm the
that, when the corporate sustainability HRM’s role in business sustainability.
leadership consider HRM as a critical HRM, through the strategic integration
contributor, HRM can redirect itself and in the formulation and implementation
the organization toward sustainability. the practices in processes, can bring
HR managers’ involvement through in the culture of sustainability in the
collaboration, consultation, and demand organization. HRM is not only serving
for HRM accountability incorporates as a tool to implement sustainability
sustainable HRM practices. At the same but also as an object of sustainability.
time, HR professionals must update Sustainability is considered not just
their approach from transactional or as an end or means for any process,
transformational HRM to strategic and it is considered as a management
to sustainable HRM. and leadership philosophy that
enables people to contribute success
It is also evident that there is strong at their work by minimizing the
correlation between HRM strategy and negative impact of their work on the
sustainability. The HRM strategy is the environmental and social factors and at
ways and means of administering HR the same time improving the financial
in a SMART tangible roadmap in its factors in the organizations.
implementation through agreeable set
targets. In retrospect, while integrating Academic and Managerial
sustainability in the planning matrix, one Implications
reassures that HRM is deliverable in the
short-, medium-, and long-term for present The present study makes both
and future generations in an operational academic and practical contributions
environment that is ever supportive and and suggests some applications for the
enriched (Wittenberg, 2012). research.
82
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
83
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
Byrne, B.M (2001), Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts,
application and programming. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence E Associates
Publishers.
Chanda, Ashok and Shen, Jie (2009), HRM strategic integration and organizational
performance, Sage Publication.
Colbert, B.A. and Kurucz, E.C. (2007), “Three conceptions of triple bottom line
business sustainability and the role for HRM”, Human Resource Planning,
Vol. 30 No. 1, 21-29.
Kiron, D., et al., (2012), Sustainability nears a tipping point. MIT Sloan Management
Review, 53(2), 69–74.
Parkes, Carole and Borland, Helen (2012), Strategic HRM: Transforming its
responsibilities towards ecological sustainability - The greatest global
challenge facing organisations, Thunderbird International Business Review,
Vol 54, No.6, Nov/Dec 2012. DOI 10.1002/tie.21505
Renwick, D., et al (2011), State of the art and future directions for green human
resource management: Introduction to special issue, German Jl. of Research
in Human Resource Management, 25(2), 99-290.
84
The South East Asian Journal of Management • Vol. 11 • No. 1 • 2017 • 70-85
Wirtenberg, J., et al., (2007), “HR’s role in building a sustainable enterprise: insights
from some of the world’s best companies”, Human Resource Planning, Vol.
30 No. 1, pp. 10-20.
World Wild Fund (2010), Living Planet report. Retrieved from http://wwf.panda.
org/ about_our_earth/ all_publications/ living_planet_report/
85