This document discusses the key concepts and trends in modern law of obligations. It begins by defining an obligation as a juridical necessity to give, do or not do something. It then outlines the essential requisites of obligations including active subjects, passive subjects, a determinate or determinable object, a juridical tie, and a cause.
The document also discusses the five main trends in modern obligations law: 1) A shift from formalism to emphasis on meeting of the minds; 2) Restrictions on party autonomy; 3) Exempting some debtor property from liability; 4) Weakening the principle that liability arises from responsibility; and 5) A tendency towards uniformity in legislation.
Finally
This document discusses the key concepts and trends in modern law of obligations. It begins by defining an obligation as a juridical necessity to give, do or not do something. It then outlines the essential requisites of obligations including active subjects, passive subjects, a determinate or determinable object, a juridical tie, and a cause.
The document also discusses the five main trends in modern obligations law: 1) A shift from formalism to emphasis on meeting of the minds; 2) Restrictions on party autonomy; 3) Exempting some debtor property from liability; 4) Weakening the principle that liability arises from responsibility; and 5) A tendency towards uniformity in legislation.
Finally
This document discusses the key concepts and trends in modern law of obligations. It begins by defining an obligation as a juridical necessity to give, do or not do something. It then outlines the essential requisites of obligations including active subjects, passive subjects, a determinate or determinable object, a juridical tie, and a cause.
The document also discusses the five main trends in modern obligations law: 1) A shift from formalism to emphasis on meeting of the minds; 2) Restrictions on party autonomy; 3) Exempting some debtor property from liability; 4) Weakening the principle that liability arises from responsibility; and 5) A tendency towards uniformity in legislation.
Finally
This document discusses the key concepts and trends in modern law of obligations. It begins by defining an obligation as a juridical necessity to give, do or not do something. It then outlines the essential requisites of obligations including active subjects, passive subjects, a determinate or determinable object, a juridical tie, and a cause.
The document also discusses the five main trends in modern obligations law: 1) A shift from formalism to emphasis on meeting of the minds; 2) Restrictions on party autonomy; 3) Exempting some debtor property from liability; 4) Weakening the principle that liability arises from responsibility; and 5) A tendency towards uniformity in legislation.
Finally
Obligations and Contracts Consensuality is the prevailing
doctrine. As long as it can be
o Civil Code follows the Gaian order – 3 parts: manifest - and any kind of Persons, Things and Obligations manifestation will do - it is sufficient o “Obligations and Contracts” – inaccurate; should only be “Obligations” since Contract 2. The principle of autonomy of will of the is one of the sources of obligation. parties is now subject to several o “ob” and “ligare” - to bind or tie together restrictions. o “Ligare” – source of words such as ligament - (Art. 1305) Restrictions: not contrary and litigation to o “Obligatio” - initially a physical act of being (1) Law chained with shackles. (2) Morals o As time passed, , “ligatio” doesn’t mean (3) Good customs vinculum of chains but vinculum juris (bond (4) Public order of law) (5) Public policy Art. 1156. An obligation is a juridical necessity - Those which are against these five to give, to do or not to do. restrictions are void (Art. 1409) o incomplete; pov of debtor - However, now we have restrictions o Obligations are bilateral. It should include such as social justice, environmental what can be required, the remedy and the preservation, etc.. because of the rising tide of social discontent, means by which the creditor can take to hence social legislation came to be pursue the remedy. for the underprivileged. o An obligation is a juridical relation whereby - ^rationale: social justice (those who a person (called a creditor) may demand have less in life have more in law) from another (called the debtor) the - Social justice is "neither communism, observance of a determinate conduct, nor despotism, nor atomism, nor and, in case of breach, may obtain anarchy," but the humanization of satisfaction from the assets of the latter laws and the equalization of social (Arias Ramos). and economic forces by the State so that justice in its rational and Characteristics of Obligations objectively secular conception may 1. It represents an exclusively private at least be approximated (Calalang interest v. Williams) 2. It creates ties which are by nature transitory 3. The mitigation of the principle that the - obligations are extinguished, but the debtor should answer with all his period is relative) property 3. It involves the power to make the - Before: debtor has to answer his juridical tie defective in case of non- debts with ALL his property fulfillment through satisfaction of the - Now: certain properties are exempt debtor‘s property and these can be found in o substantive law (i.e., family Trends in the Modern Law of Obligations home) o and in procedural law (i.e. 1. Progressive spiritualization of the law on support – magtitira para obligations masupportahan ang anak) - Before: very formal & ritualistic; If it’s - the debtor may not be imprisoned not in the proper form, no obligations for non-payment of debts will assume - rationale: leave the debtor - Now: emphasis is in the meeting of something to live decently by the minds, not on form. 4. The weakening of the principle that Requisites of the Object of the obligation liability arises from responsibility - basically the principle in quasi-delicts a. Licit – Example: Can‘t validly enter into a contract for sexual services - a person may be held liable even if not responsible b. Possible both in fact and in law – - i.e. minor is responsible – guardian is physical and legal possibility liable c. Determinate or determinable d. Must have pecuniary value 5. The tendency of unity in modern legislation 4. Vinculum juris (Juridical tie) - can be manifest in the rise of a - consists of the enforceability of the “global village” obligation - seen particularly in trade laws - If the debtor does not conform, the - tendency is to make things uniform creditor has the power to go to court especially in commerce. Different to make the debtor perform rules would impede commerce. (coercive force) - Voluntariness goes into entering into Essential Requisites of Obligations an obligation. But once you enter, it becomes involuntary. 1. Active subject - to give: creditor 5. Causa - to do: obligee - causa debendi or causa 2. Passive subject obligationes - to give: debtor - the why of an obligation - to do: obligor How can both subjects be determinate or 6. Form (not an essential requisite) determinable? - general rule: no specific form for a valid obligation. a) Obligations where the subjects are - if form means that there is some completely and absolutely determined at external manifestation, fine. the birth of an obligation. However, there should still be no b) Obligations where one subject is specific form. determined at the moment of the birth of the obligation and the other subject is to be Sources of Obligations determined subsequently at some fixed Art. 1157. Obligations arise from: criterion, which criterion is fixed at the start (1) Law; of the obligation. (i.e. promissory note (2) Contracts; endorsement) (3) Quasi-contracts; c) Obligations in which subjects are (4) Acts or omissions punished by law; and determined in accordance with its relation (5) Quasi-delicts. to a thing. (i.e. mortgage attached to a Is this exclusive? AFFIRMATIVE (Sagrada purchased property can be demandable Orden v. NACOCO) However, this is only from the new owner) by implication or indication. Many believe that the list is not exclusive 3. Object/Prestation one more possible source - public offer. - always consists in an activity or conduct to be observed by the 1. Law debtor towards the creditor Art. 1158. Obligations derived from law are not - prestation = object of obligation – to presumed. Only those expressly determined deliver car in this Code or in special laws are - car = object of the prestation demandable, and shall be regulated by the precepts of the law which - There is only 1 ultimate source of obligations – law owner is in a position to do so. (Art. 2. Contract 2144) Art. 1159. Obligations arising from contracts - Requisites: have the force of law between the contracting (1) Business/property must be parties and should be complied with in good neglected or abandoned faith. (2) Officious manager must not - combines two concepts of Roman law - have been authorized by the equity or good faith and strict owner compliance by the parties - Obligation to reimburse belong to - A contract is a meeting of minds the owner of the property between 2 persons whereby one binds - It is not necessary that some benefit himself, with respect to the other, to has been given. There may be no give something or to render some actual benefit. As long as benefit service (Art. 1305) could have possibly accrued - The contracting parties may establish - Rules: such stipulations, clauses, terms and (1) There must be no ratification. conditions as they may deem Otherwise, it may fall under the convenient, provided they are not contract of agency contrary to law, morals, good customs, o If there was no ratification, the public order, or public policy (Art. 1306) owner must reimburse the - Contracts are perfected by mere inofficious of the useful and consent, and from that moment the necessary expenses as well as parties are bound not only to the the damages he suffered in fulfillment of what has been expressly discharge of his functions stipulated but also to all the consequences which, according to b. Solutio Indebiti their nature, may be in keeping with - Juridical relation which takes place good faith, usage and law (Art. 1315) when somebody receives something - In case of doubt, the interpretation from another without any right to consistent with good faith is followed demand for it and the thing was - Party cannot excuse themselves on unduly delivered to him through the ground that it has become mistake unprofitable - Not applicable when there is a motivation by an act of liberality 3. Quasi-contract - Does mistake include mistake of Art. 1160. Obligations derived from quasi- law? If payment by mistake includes contracts shall be subject to the provisions of it, we are deviating from provisions of Chapter 1, Title XVII, of this Book. art. 3 (ignorance of the law excuses - Juridical relation which arises from no one of compliance therewith.) lawful, voluntary, and unilateral acts No one can ever claim a mistake of which are enforceable to the end that law as a defense. no one shall be unjustly enriched or - Payment by a mistake in benefited at the expense of another. interpretation of a difficult question a. Negotiorum Gestio of law qualifies as a mistake that can - Whoever voluntarily takes charge of justify an act of recovery of what the agency or management of the have been paid under the principle business or property of another, of solutio indebiti. without any power from the latter, is - (Art. 2155) Payment by reason of a obliged to continue the same until mistake in the construction or the termination of the affair and its application of a doubtful or difficult incidents, or to require the person question of law may come within the concerned to substitute him, if the scope of the preceding article. 4. Delict Art. 1161. Civil obligations arising from criminal Kinds of Obligations offenses shall be governed by the penal laws, 1. To give (Articles 1163-1166) subject to the provisions of article 2177, and of the pertinent provisions of Chapter 2, a. To give a determinate thing Preliminary Title, on Human Relations, and of - Primary Obligation: Giving what is Title XVIII of this Book, regulating damages. supposed to be given - General Rule: If you commit a crime, you - 3 Accessory Obligations: are liable both criminally and civilly. (1) to take care of it with the proper - Exception: No private offended party (i.e. diligence of a good father of the contempt) family (Art. 1163) o General Rule: Diligence of a 5. Quasi-delict good father of the family Art. 1162. Obligations derived from quasi- o Exception: Law or stipulation delicts shall be governed by the provisions of requires different standard of Chapter 2, Title XVII of this Book, and by care special laws. (2) To account and deliver to the - Art. 2176. Whoever by act or omission creditor the fruits if the thing causes damage to another, there being bears fruits upon the time the fault or negligence, is obliged to pay for obligation to deliver it arises (Art. the damage done. Such fault or 1164) negligence, if there is no pre-existing (3) To deliver the accessions and contractual relation between the parties, accessories (Art. 1166) is called a quasi-delict. o Don‘t take accession in the - Requisites: technical sense. Understand it (1) There is fault or negligence of the to mean things that go with defendant resulting to a wrongful the thing to be delivered (i.e. act or omission, whether voluntary or car radio) not, whether criminal or not. - Remedies Available to the Creditor (2) There is damage or injury suffered by o Specific performance - the another debtor must perform it (3) There is a direct causa relation personally between the fault or negligence o Equivalent performance – and the resulting damage and injury damages (may be obtained (proximate cause) exclusively or in addition to - a civil law term while tort is a common other remedies) law term - Difference between Contractual Liability and Quasi-Delict o QD: the obligation arises only when there is a violation. Without violation, there is no obligation. It is the breach itself which gives rise to the obligation. o Contracts: there is already an obligation which exists prior to or even without a breach. The breach of the contract is immaterial to the legal obligation. - Breach and quasi-delict are inseparable. But contract and breach may be separable. - Are contracts and quasi-delicts mutually exclusive? NO