Origin and Development of Anthropology
Origin and Development of Anthropology
Origin and Development of Anthropology
ANTHROPOLOGY
March, UPSC Daily Current Affairs
Syllabus Section: 1.1 Meaning, Scope And Development of Anthropology
Introduction
Anthropology even though a new subject, occupies an important position in the academic arena of the
world. Today it is taught in almost all the famous universities of the world. Moreover anthropologists are
employed in different levels of administration. It took long time for anthropology to develop as an
independent discipline of teaching and research. Even though human was intrinsically curious to know
about worldly phenomenon, a systematic analysis of human life originated very late. Here we shall
examine how the subject anthropology achieved its present status in the world and in India.
We have just been familiarised with the meaning and the different areas of anthropology. Its wide and
varied scope is one of its unique peculiarities. But, do you think the scope of anthropology was so wide in
the initial stage of its development? Anthropology is comparatively a new subject, and the origin and
growth of the subject has taken place through centuries. Any attempt to understand human life can be
considered an introduction to anthropological Understanding. The growth of anthropology in the world
in different stages is discussed below.
Different attempts have been made to recount the development of anthropology in the world. Among
these, T. K. Penniman’s contribution is worth mentioning. He classifies the development of anthropology
into four Periods viz. Formulatory period, convergent period, constructive period and critical period. He
proposes these classifications in his book ‘Hundred Years of Anthropology’ (1935) as discussed below:
During this period, divergent views about the origin of biological and social aspects of human
being were expressed by scholars of different countries. Among these, the contributions of Karl
Marx (1818 – 1883), Charles Lyell (1797 – 1895), and of William Smith (1769 – 1839) are
important. Marx accepted the dialectical process as the moving power of history.
In the field of Archaeology, Boucher Deperthe’s discoveries of flint implements at Abbeville in
1838 and 1846, Dr. Rigollet’s discovery at Saint Acheul in 1854 are some of the new
developments.
Neanderthal’s discovery at Dusseldorf in 1857 gave a new outlook about human evolution.
James Prichard classified and systematized the facts about races of humankind in his book The
Natural History of Man in 1833 and Physical History of Man in 1836. He proposed the differences
of colour, hair, stature and form and examined the criteria of racial classification.
The convergence of all these ideas was completed with the publication of Charles Darwin’s book
The Origin of Species (1859). In this book, he proposed his theory of organic evolution popularly
known as ‘Darwinism’. With the publication of this book, physical evolution of human being
based on scientific investigation was established. Thus, diversities of arguments expressed about
origin of human being and society came to an end with the publication of Origin of Species.
Penniman used the term ‘critical’ to denote this period because of the crucial contribution made
to the development of Anthropology during this period. Some significant developments had also
marked this period.
The first chair of social anthropology was started in 1908 in the University of Liverpool in Britain.
It was chaired by Sir James Frazer.
The first Anthropology department in India was started in the University of Calcutta in 1920. In
1919, Social anthropology had been introduced as a subject in the Department of Sociology at
the University of Bombay. During this period, different schools of thought in anthropology were
founded. Functional school of thought, structural school of thought, school of diffusion, and
culture and personality school are prominent among them.
Authors of this period specialised in theorizing the concepts, definitions and different aspects of
culture. For instance, B K Malinowski, based on his field expedition among the Trobriand
Islanders proposed his idea of Functionalism. Radcliffe Brown, based on his study of the
Andaman Islanders established his theory of Social Structure during this period.
Similarly, the American scholars such as A L Kroeber, Ruth Benedict, Margaret Mead, and Clark
Wissler played their own role in shaping the destiny of world anthropology.