24 Time For The Fourth Dimension in Attention: Anna C. (Kia) Nobre Gustavo Rohenkohl

The Oxford Handbook of Attention
Anna C. (Kia) Nobre (ed.), Sabine Kastner (ed.)
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199675111.001.0001
Published: 2014 Online ISBN: 9780191753015 Print ISBN: 9780199675111
CHAPTER
24 Time for the Fourth Dimension in Attention 

Anna C. (Kia) Nobre, Gustavo Rohenkohl
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199675111.013.036 Pages 676–722
Published: 01 April 2014
Abstract
This chapter takes attention into the fourth dimension by considering research that explores how
predictive information in the temporal structure of events can contribute to optimizing perception.
The authors review behavioural and neural ndings from three lines of investigation in which the
temporal regularity and predictability of events are manipulated through rhythms, hazard functions,
and cues. The ndings highlight the fundamental role temporal expectations play in shaping several
aspects of performance, from early perceptual analysis to motor preparation. They also reveal
modulation of neural activity by temporal expectations all across the brain. General principles of how
temporal expectations are generated and bias information processing are still emerging. The picture so
far suggests that there may be multiple sources of temporal expectation, which can bias multiple
stages of stimulus analysis depending on the stages of information processing that are critical for task
performance. Neural oscillations are likely to provide an important medium through which the
anticipated timing of events can regulate neuronal excitability.
Keywords: temporal expectations, temporal orienting, spatial attention, entrainment, active sensing,
communication through coherence, neural oscillations
Subject: Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychology
Series: Oxford Library of Psychology
SELECTIVE attention, understood as the processes that focus neural processing in service of current goals
and requirements, is inherently and necessarily dynamic. As we navigate along, our receptor surfaces move,
events in the environment unfold, and the relationships between our receptors and events change.
Ironically perhaps, our core theoretical and computational models of attention are primarily static. They
consider mechanisms for selecting relevant or conspicuous target events and inhibiting irrelevant or
interfering distraction within freeze-frame instants of experience. As the many chapters in this Handbook
attest, tremendous progress has been made in revealing these snapshot mechanisms of attention control
and modulation at various levels of organization. However, still largely missing is the consideration of
whether and how predictive information in the temporal structure of events can contribute to optimizing
perception.
Considering how predictive temporal information can in uence perceptual analysis necessitates
contemplating new types of modulatory mechanisms. To date, most snapshot mechanisms revealed to
enhance perceptual analysis involve regulating and coordinating neuronal excitability according to
receptive eld properties in anticipation of relevant events. However, we still understand little about
whether and how receptive eld properties are speci cally tuned to temporal intervals within sensory areas.
Furthermore, it is unclear how pre-activation of neurons with temporal speci city would preserve temporal
estimates. How then can the anticipated timings of relevant events be used to regulate neuronal excitability
during perceptual analysis? This chapter reviews the early steps of a burgeoning literature addressing this
intriguing and fundamental question.
Early Studies
The role played by the temporal structure of events in guiding perception was not always ignored. The
temporal interval between events, known as the foreperiod, has long been acknowledged to be one of the
p. 677 main determinants of response speeds in a variety of tasks (see Teichner 1954; Niemi and Näätänen
1981). According to our reading, Wilhelm Wundt (1874/1904) may have been the rst to show that response
times are faster in the presence of a warning signal that predicts the occurrence of a target after a constant
and predictable interval. He gave participants the task of releasing a key upon hearing the sound of a steel

ball hitting a metal plate. They were signi cantly faster when they had the opportunity to view the release
mechanism that dropped the ball. (The foreperiod was manipulated by adjusting the height of the release
mechanism.) Extending Wundt’s investigation, Woodrow (1914) manipulated the regularity of the interval
between a warning signal and a target on a trial-by-trial basis. Response times were faster when intervals
were constant and predictable, than when they were variable and unpredictable (Fig. 24.1a). Subsequent
investigations showed that though bene ts are larger when the nature of the stimulus and response are
predetermined, they also occur in choice reaction-time tasks when the identity of the stimulus and the
p. 678 response remain uncertain (Bertelson and Boons 1960).
Figure 24.1
Pioneer investigations on the e ect of time in perception and action. (a) E ect of regular and irregular foreperiods on reaction
times found by Woodrow (1914: 43). Foreperiod intervals are presented on the X-axis, and reaction times on the Y-axis. The upper
curve represents the results with irregular foreperiods, showing consistently high reaction times. The lower line shows faster
reaction times with regular foreperiods, which also increase as foreperiods are lengthened (attributed to increasing di iculty to
estimate longer intervals accurately). Adapted from Woodrow H., The Measurement of Attention, p. 43 © 1914, Whitefish. (b)
Results reported by Egan et al. (1961: 774) showing decrements in discriminability (ds) performance as a function of increasing
temporal uncertainty. Markers indicate mean values for each observer (AS and GG). Adapted from Archives of Psychology 61,
Newhall, S. N., E ects of attention on the intensity of cutaneous pressure and on visual brightness pp. 5–75, 1923. (c) Subjective
brightness report for each participant in the three experimental conditions (ʻSituationsʼ) presented in Newhall (1923: 60).
ʻSituationsʼ represent di erent levels of temporal expectation, from high (III) to low (I). Adapted from, The Journal of Acoustical
Society of America 33(6), Egan, J. P., Greenberg, G. Z., Schulman, A. I., Interval of Time Uncertainty in Auditory Detection, pp. 771–
778 © 1961, Acoustical Society of America.
Bene ts carried by temporal prediction in these early tasks were usually interpreted as resulting from
increases in the level of readiness of a general type of attention. The degree of preparation was proposed to
increase as certainty of the foreperiods increased and as the length of the foreperiod on a particular trial
increased (Woodrow 1914; Karlin 1959). An alternative account proposed an additional speci c process of
temporal ‘anticipation’, in which the prospective intervals of events are estimated from the time of warning
cue (Nickerson 1965; Snodgrass 1969).
Egan et al. (1961) developed a simple and elegant design to explore further the role of temporal un/certainty
in perception. They varied temporal expectation parametrically across experimental blocks by presenting an
auditory stimulus sometime during the persistence of a light signal of varying duration (e.g. 1 / 2 / 4 / 8 secs
in Experiment 1). Detectability deteriorated progressively with the increasing temporal uncertainty
associated with increasing interval durations (Fig. 24.1b). Findings were later con rmed and extended in
similar experiments in the visual domain by Lowe (1967), Lasley and Cohn (1981), and Westheimer and Ley
(1996). Together, these studies suggested that temporal prediction could improve perceptual judgements
about target events, and have e ects beyond merely speeding response times.
Newhall (1923) introduced the use of rhythms to manipulate temporal expectations. He showed that the
brightness perception of a visual stimulus was increased if the stimulus occurred at the next temporal
interval of a regular, isochronous rhythm induced by a series of auditory clicks. The three experimental
conditions of the experiment involved the visual target occurring 1 sec after a series of ve auditory clicks
separated by 1-sec intervals (i.e. on the sixth beat of the rhythm), occurring 4 secs after the train of ve
auditory clicks, or occurring after a 9-sec interval with no leading rhythm (Fig. 24.1c). As the reader may
have noted, not all relevant experimental variables were well controlled in this early experiment.
Furthermore, behavioural performance was measured subjectively and compared without statistical

methods. Nevertheless, the intent was to manipulate temporal expectations—to ‘create three di erent pre-
stimulus situations which di ered among other things in that they made the observer aware of the time at
which the stimulus would occur’ (Newhall 1923: 55).
As is plain to see, these pioneering studies started tapping into some fundamental issues about how
temporal predictability and structure of events in uence performance. For example, they indicate di erent
ways of manipulating temporal expectations and suggest that there may be multiple points of in uence
along sensory-motor processing. Inexplicably, somehow, there was insu cient momentum, and
investigations into the selective attention based on the timing of events lagged behind those of spatial and
object-based attention, leaving the temporal dimension largely out of the established contemporary
models. The landscape is changing again. Scholars interested in the selective biasing of information
processing have rediscovered, sometimes de novo, the importance of temporal expectations in shaping
perception. Present-day methods enable a detailed characterization of behavioural consequences of
temporal expectations, and are beginning to provide a glimpse into the neural modulatory and control
p. 679 mechanisms.
Rhythms
Rhythms provide arguably the most natural and common source of temporal predictions of events. These
come from the structure of events in the environment (e.g. cadence of speech, the tempo of music, the
breaking of waves) as well as from our means to sample and interact with the environment (e.g. saccadic eye
movements, walking, breathing) (see Schroeder et al. 2010).
Jones and her colleagues are modern-day pioneers in investigating how rhythms modulate perceptual
excitability over time (Jones 1976; Jones and Boltz 1989; Jones et al. 2002, 2006). Using a similar approach
to that initially introduced by Newhall (1923), Jones’s tasks typically manipulate the timing of auditory
target events relative to a regular isochronic rhythm. The results have consistently shown optimal
perceptual discrimination for auditory targets coinciding with the predicted beat of the rhythm, with
performance degrading exponentially with increasing leading or lagging intervals between the target and
the predicted moment (Jones et al. 2002) (Fig. 24.2a). Rhythmically induced expectations have been found to
confer behavioural advantages even when they are not predictive of the timing of the target, suggesting that
temporal anticipation triggered by isochronous rhythms may operate through an automatic, exogenous
process (for a review see Jones 2010). Using pre-exposure to a rhythm to induce temporal expectations,
Sanabria and colleagues have also reported improvements in response times to auditory targets occurring at
the beat of the leading isochronous rhythm, even when the rhythm did not reliably predict the timing of the
target stimulus (Sanabria et al. 2011). The automatic nature of the bene ts conferred by rhythms was
supported by a further study by the same group showing that simultaneously performing a demanding
working-memory task did not interfere with the e ects of rhythmic temporal expectations (de la Rosa et al.
2012).
Perceptual Modulation
Similar patterns of facilitation for events coinciding with regular isochronous rhythms have also been
reported in the visual modality. Mathewson and colleagues (2010) used a series of zero, two, four, or eight
visual cues presented at a regular pace (12.1 Hz) to entrain rhythmic visual attention. Next came the target
event, containing a visual stimulus or a blank followed by metacontrast masking. The target occurred either
at the beat, or at increasing leading or lagging intervals (25 or 50 ms). Target detectability, measured by d′,
was maximal when the target coincided with the preceding rhythm (Fig. 24.2b). Perceptual facilitation for
targets occurring after eight entrainers was substantial compared to a control condition that equated the
foreperiod duration for target onset and forward masking e ects (i.e. 55% increase in d′). Praamstra and
colleagues (2006) recorded EEG during a related task in which a train of regularly presented 11–21
imperative stimuli (at 1.5 or 2.0s stimulus-onset asynchrony (SOA)) was followed by a temporally deviant

target (at 1.75s SOA). Response times to deviant targets were slowed relative to the regular stimuli, and
p. 680
electrophysiological recordings showed evidence of anticipatory activity related to the rhythm of the initial
stimuli (Fig. 24.2c). Alpha-band desynchronization, linked to anticipation of visual targets (Foxe et al. 1998;
Kelly et al. 2006, 2009; Worden et al. 2000; Snyder and Foxe 2010; Bollimunta et al. 2008, 2011; Wyart
p. 681
and Tallon-Baudry 2008; Yamagishi et al. 2008; Mathewson et al. 2009; O’Connell et al. 2009; Gould et al.
2011), was accentuated from the time the target was predicted by the rhythm. Slow preparatory brain
activity related to motor preparation in the contingent negative variation (Walter et al. 1964) also developed
more steeply toward the end of the interval in the context of faster compared to slower rhythms. Visual
event-related potentials (ERPs) evoked by the targets also showed modulation by preceding temporal
rhythm, with larger N1 potentials occurring for targets occurring later versus earlier than predicted by the
preceding short versus long rhythm respectively.
Figure 24.2
Using rhythms to orient attention in time. (a) Findings from Jones et al. (2002) showing mean proportion correct to discriminate
auditory targets as a function of its interval relative to a preceding rhythm. Maximum performance occurs on the expected
rhythmic beat interval and falls o systematically as the target occurs increasingly early or late. Adapted from Mari Riess Jones,
Heather Moynihan, Noah MacKenzie, and Jennifer Puente, Psychological Science, 13(4), pp. 313–319, copyright © 2002 by SAGE
Publications. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications. (b) Findings reported in Mathewson et al. (2010). Solid line shows
the tuning of detection rate for visual targets preceded by predictive rhythms. Performance is maximal for events at the
predicted interval and falls o systematically for progressively early or late events. Dashed line shows performance at equivalent
intervals in a control condition with no preceding rhythm. Reprinted from Praamstra, P., Kourtis, D., Kwok, H. F., Oostenveld, R.,
Neurophysiology of implicit timing in serial choice reaction-time performance, The Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal
of the Society for Neuroscience, 26(20), pp. 5448–5455 © 2006, The Society for Neuroscience. (c) Event-related potentials (ERP)
and time course of alpha-band activity (Alpha TSE (temporal spectral evolution)) over occipital electrodes in Praamstra et al.
(2006). Alpha-band activity decreases sharply at the time of the expected stimulus (1500 ms) in the short SOA condition, as
highlighted by shading in the Alpha TSE plots. This desynchronization in the alpha band was accompanied by an increase in
visual evoked activity, as highlighted by shading in the ERP plots. Reprinted from Cognition, 115(1), Kyle E. Mathewson, Monica
Fabiani, Gabriele Gratton, Diane M. Beck, and Alejandro Lleras, Rescuing stimuli from invisibility: Inducing a momentary release
from visual masking with pre-target entrainment, pp. 186–91, Copyright (2010), with permission from Elsevier.
In our laboratory we have used a complementary approach to investigate the e ects of temporal expectation
on perceptual processing—manipulating the regularity of the temporal context of target events. Our
ndings show that temporal expectations combine with spatial expectations to enhance perceptual
processing, and implicate ongoing oscillatory brain activity in mediating the e ects of temporal
expectations.
In one series of studies (see Fig. 24.3), we manipulated the regularity of the timing with which a target (a
small disc) moved in discrete jumps across a display containing an occluding band. When the disc moved at
a regular, isochronous pace, it was possible to predict exactly when the target would re-emerge after
disappearing behind the occluding band. The basic task involved making a ne visual discrimination within
the target disc when it re-emerged and executing a speeded detection (go/no-go) or forced-choice response
accordingly. In the rst study, temporal and spatial predictability of the target were manipulated
orthogonally in a factorial design. The disc moved with regular or irregular pace along a linear or erratic

trajectory across the display. Temporal and spatial expectations conferred similar bene t to response times.
Recordings of event-related potentials showed that the similar behavioural e ects of isolated temporal or
spatial expectations came about through distinct patterns of neural modulation. Of speci c relevance to
perceptual modulation, isolated spatial expectations (i.e. under temporal uncertainty) increased the
magnitude of visual P1 potentials contralateral to spatially expected targets, in line with spatial orienting
e ects in spatial cueing tasks (Mangun and Hillyard 1987; Eimer 1994). In contrast, isolated temporal
expectations had no e ect on the rst visual potential (see also Correa and Nobre 2008). Strikingly,
however, temporal expectation greatly potentiated the P1 gain modulation by spatial attention (Fig. 24.3b).
Furthermore, amplitude of the contralateral P1 potential correlated signi cantly with the average response
time in go trials across participants. Modulation of later stages of processing (N1, N2, and P3 potentials) by
temporal versus spatial expectations occurred in dissociable ways. The ndings from this study suggested
that temporal expectations combine synergistically with predictive information about other stimulus
attributes (in this case location) that can be mapped onto receptive eld properties to time the biasing of
excitability in a top-down fashion. We are currently exploring the reliability and generalizability of this
hypothesis.
Using a streamlined and optimized design (Fig. 24.3a), we subsequently replicated the perceptual
facilitation conferred by temporal expectations to spatially predicted targets and were able to examine
e ects of combined spatiotemporal expectations on anticipatory brain activity during the occlusion period
(Rohenkohl and Nobre 2011). Analysis of induced oscillatory activity during the period when the target
p. 682 remained
p. 683
occluded showed that alpha-band activity over occipital electrodes became temporally structured in the
regular, rhythmic condition. Alpha-band desynchronization followed the time course of temporal
expectation induced by the preceding rhythmic pace, being maximal at the predicted times of disc
occurrence under the occluding band and of its reappearance after occlusion (Fig. 24.3c). Our ndings
support the ability of oscillatory activity to mediate changes in neural excitability according to temporal
expectations induced by the regular timing of events.
Figure 24.3

Results from Rohenkohl and Nobre (2011) and Doherty et al. (2005) showing the synergistic e ect between temporal and spatial
expectations. (a) Schematic of the task used in Rohenkohl and Nobre (2011) based on the original task by Doherty et al. (2005).
Bar plot showing reaction times for valid, neutral, and invalid temporal expectation. Note how valid rhythmic temporal
expectation shortens reaction times for targets appearing a er the short occlusion. Temporal expectations are equated at the
long-occlusion interval, and there are no reaction-time di erences then. Reprinted from Doherty, J. R., Rao, A., Mesulam, M. M.,
Nobre, A. C., Synergistic e ect of combined temporal and spatial expectations on visual attention, The Journal of Neuroscience:
The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 25(36), pp. 8259–8266 © 2005, The Society for Neuroscience. (b) Topographies
presented in Doherty et al. (2005) showing enhanced attentional modulation of early visual P1 potential (between 100 and 130
ms) by combined spatial and temporal expectations (ST-N) relative to spatial expectation alone (S-N). Reprinted from
Rohenkohl, G., Nobre, A. C., Alpha oscillations related to anticipatory attention follow temporal expectations, The Journal of
Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 31(40), pp. 14076–14084 © 2011, The Society for Neuroscience.
(c) Time course and topographies of alpha-band activity found in Rohenkohl and Nobre (2011) in regular vs. irregular conditions
during the long-occlusion period. The schematic above shows the timings of events: the moment when the disc disappears
under the occluding band (0 ms), the moment of the invisible step under the occluding band (600 ms), and the moment when
the disc reappears (1400 ms). Temporal expectations developed from a regular rhythmic pattern of stimulation led to time-
modulation of alpha-band activity over visual electrodes in anticipation of the target onset.
In a related behavioural experiment, we demonstrated that the facilitatory e ect of temporal expectations
on response times induced by rhythmic apparent motion occurred relatively automatically, and
independently of strategic factors (Rohenkohl et al. 2011). The temporal manipulation induced by the
regularity of motion (valid, rhythmic versus neutral, arrhythmic conditions) was crossed with a
manipulation whereby the colour of the disc acted as a symbolic cue that predicted the timing for target
reappearance (valid, 100% predictive versus neutral, non-predictive). In addition to the manipulations of
rhythmic and symbolic cueing, we also introduced instructions to attend to the speed (rhythm) or the colour
of the disc. The results showed that both rhythmic and symbolic temporal cues speeded response times, but
in dissociable ways. Rhythmic cues facilitated performance regardless of the instructions, but symbolic cues
were only e ective when participants attended to the symbolic, colour information. These ndings indicate
that there may be multiple, qualitatively distinct sources of temporal expectations operating upon
information processing.
In a second series of studies, we used a psychophysical approach combined with computational modelling to
investigate the consequences of rhythmic temporal expectations on visual perceptual discrimination (Cravo
et al. 2013; Rohenkohl et al. 2012a). Participants had to discriminate the orientation of a Gabor grating,
presented at one of seven contrast levels and embedded within a patch of Gaussian noise. Targets appeared
within foveal streams of Gaussian-noise patches presented in a ‘regular’, isochronous rhythm (50 ms
duration, 400 ms SOA) or in an ‘irregular’, jittered fashion (50 ms duration, 200/300/400/500/600 ms SOA)
(Fig. 24.4a). Importantly, the timing around the target stimulus was equated between the two conditions,
with 400 ms SOA between the target and the preceding and subsequent adjacent noise patches. Contrast
levels for targets were calibrated to individuals’ thresholds, anchored at 75% accuracy and varying 1–3 units
above and below in steps of 0.1 on a logarithmic scale. The occurrence of targets was signalled by a coloured
annulus around the stimulus patch to prompt a forced-choice response. In our rst behavioural
investigation (Rohenkohl et al. 2012a), response times were faster in the regular, rhythmic condition. In
addition, psychometric functions for the proportion of correct responses estimated for individual
participants showed that rhythmic temporal expectation signi cantly increased the contrast sensitivity for
target detection (lowering threshold values). A simple di usion model (Palmer et al. 2005) indicated that
temporal expectation improved the quality of sensory information by enhancing the signal-to-noise
contrast of the sensory evidence upon which decisions were made. Our subsequent study combining the
p. 684 same design
p. 685
with EEG recordings replicated these psychophysical and modelling e ects, and provided evidence that

entrainment of low-frequency oscillatory brain activity to regular stimulus timings may mediate the
perceptual bene ts (Cravo et al. 2013). Oscillatory activity in the frequency range of the stimulus trains
(delta-band activity, 1–4 Hz) became more synchronized in the regular, rhythmic condition over occipital
electrodes. Furthermore, delta phase was tightly related to target discriminability, and the optimal delta
phase became aligned to target presentation in the regular, rhythmic condition (Fig. 24.4b). Entrainment of
delta phase was closely related to increases in contrast gain and the modelling parameter for the sensory
accumulation rate. Subsequent visual potentials evoked by target stimuli also became more sensitive to
target contrast in the regular, rhythmic condition.
Figure 24.4

Rhythmic temporal expectation enhances perceptual processing of visual events. (a) Schematic of the task used in Rohenkohl et
al. (2012). Stimuli appeared exactly every 400 ms in the regular condition, and appeared between 200 and 600 ms in the irregular
condition. Occasional target stimuli were indicated by a pink circumference, and participants discriminated the orientation of a
Gabor grating embedded within a Gaussian noise patch. Psychometric functions described performance in regular and irregular
temporal expectation conditions as a function of target contrast. Stimulus contrasts were set for each participant using a
staircase procedure in an irregular stream of events; Stimulus intensity = 0 corresponds to the contrast value yielding 75%
performance threshold. A shi in threshold, but not slope, of the psychometric function indicates that temporal expectation
increases the contrast sensitivity for target events. Di erences in slope (non-significant) and threshold (significant) are also
plotted for regular and irregular temporal conditions in the bar graphs. Scatterplots show the e ect of temporal expectation on
slope and threshold values for each participant (bluedots indicate the group average). Reprinted from Rohenkohl, G., Cravo, A.
M., Wyart, V., and Nobre, A. C., Temporal expectation improves the quality of sensory information, 32(24), pp. 8424–8428 © 2012,
The Society for Neuroscience. (b) Results from in Cravo et al. (2013) showing how the entrainment of delta oscillations over
visual areas was closely related to a concurrent enhancement of perceptual discrimination to relevant events. Colour map shows
the relationship between delta phase and contrast gain in the regular, rhythmic condition. Black line superimposed onto colour
map indicates the mean delta phase across participants. R-values line plots show the time course of the correlation between
delta phase and contrast gain. Black line along the X-axis (time) indicates when correlation between delta phase and contrast
gain was significantly higher in the regular than in the irregular condition (cluster p < 0.05). Lower line plots show contrast gain
and residual response times as a function of the distance from mean phase in the pre-target period (–140 to –30 ms) in the
regular condition. This figure shows clearly a decrease in contrast gain and increase in reaction times as distance from mean
phase increases. Reprinted from Cravo, A. M., Rohenkohl, G., Wyart, V., Nobre, A. C., Temporal expectation enhances contrast
sensitivity by phase entrainment of low-frequency oscillations in visual cortex, 33(9), pp. 4002–4010 © 2013, The Society for
Neuroscience.
Mathewson and colleagues (2012) conducted a similar experiment using EEG to test whether and how
oscillatory brain activity mediated e ects of rhythmic temporal expectation. The task was based on their
previous study (Mathewson et al. 2010), using rapidly presented streams of stimuli followed by
metacontrast masks. In the regular, rhythmic condition, the target followed eight entrainer stimuli
appearing at a regular rate (~12 Hz, every 82.3 ms). In the irregular condition, stimulus-onset asynchronies
between entrainers varied, but the overall time until target appearance was equated to that of the regular
condition. Targets appeared at the time predicted by the regular rhythm or in progressively leading or
lagging o sets. As in their previous study, visibility was maximal for targets at the predicted time for the
rhythmic condition and fell o with increasing o sets. The e ect varied with the degree of regularity in
variable entraining rhythms, and was absent in a no-rhythm control condition. Power and phase-locking of
oscillatory activity within the frequency of stimulus presentation (~12 Hz, in the alpha band) was
signi cantly higher in the regular rhythmic condition over posterior occipital and parietal electrodes, and
phase-locked uctuations co-varied with uctuations in visual awareness.
Entrainment of oscillatory activity has also been reported in the auditory domain. Henry and Obleser (2012)
found that ability of listeners to detect short gaps within a 3 Hz frequency modulated stimulus clustered
around speci c preferred phases of the frequency modulation, and was best predicted by the phase of delta-
band activity entrained to the temporal structure of the stimulus (see also Will and Berg 2007). Using
magnetoencephalogram in rhythmic auditory tasks, Large and colleagues have also proposed that activity in
the gamma (Snyder and Large 2005; Fujioka et al. 2009) and beta (Fujioka et al. 2012) band is induced in
anticipation of temporally regular events.
Neuronal Mechanisms
By combining laminar recordings of local eld potentials (LFPs) and multi-unit recordings in macaques,
Lakatos, Schroeder, and colleagues provided some of the rst evidence suggesting that entrainment of
neuronal activity to external events is an important attentional mechanism—regulating neuronal
excitability according to temporal expectation (see also Schroeder, Herrero and Haegens (in chapter 17),
this volume). In a set of pioneering studies, Lakatos and colleagues (2008, 2009) recorded neural responses
p. 686 in primary visual (V1) and primary auditory (A1) cortices during performance of an intermodal attention

task in which near-rhythmic streams of visual and auditory stimuli were interdigitated. On average, the
interval between successive stimuli in each modality was 650 ms (500–800 ms range, 1.5 Hz, in the delta
o
frequency), and the two stimulus streams remained 180 out of phase over trials. As expected, current-
source density and multi-unit responses in V1 were signi cantly enhanced when the visual stream was
task-relevant compared with when the auditory stream was relevant. In addition, they also discovered that
low-frequency oscillations became entrained to the carrier rhythm of the task-relevant, attended stimuli
and that higher frequency gamma-band activity became coupled to these delta oscillations. Single-trial
analysis of the in uence of delta-phase on event-related responses showed visual responses to be
systematically related to the pre-stimulus delta phase. Based on their ndings and previous literature, the
authors proposed a mechanism by which task-relevant events are capable of resetting ongoing oscillatory
activity. In contexts containing rhythmic events, entrainment of low frequency oscillatory activity plays an
active part in regulating neuronal excitability through hierarchical cross-frequency coupling that leads to
increases in response gains and ampli cation of neuronal responses to task-relevant stimuli (Lakatos et al.
2008, 2009; Schroeder and Lakatos 2009b; see also Lakatos et al. 2005; Canolty et al. 2006). In the absence
of a rhythmic context, when attention needs to be sustained tonically over time, low-frequency oscillations
may be suppressed (e.g. see Fries et al. 2001).
A recent study by Lakatos and colleagues (2013) further suggests how temporal entrainment of low-
frequency activity aids di erentiation between competing stimuli occurring at similar times. Macaques
were cued to attend to one of two competing auditory streams of di erent frequency content that di ered in
their rate of presentation (1.6 vs. 1.8 Hz). As in the intermodal studies, low-frequency oscillation became
entrained to the attended auditory stream. However, the phase of entrainment depended on the tone
frequency, with counter phase entrainment to attended versus unattended tones. The result was
ampli cation and sharpening of neuronal responses to relevant tones at attended time points.
Working Hypotheses and Open Questions

Together, ndings in humans and in macaques support recent proposals that entrainment of neural
excitability to environmental rhythms is a fundamental aspect of successful perceptual selection.
Entrainment of brain activity to sensory input may be a pervasive mechanism across animal species. For
example, it has been observed in the optic tectum in the larvae of zebra sh (Sumbre et al. 2008), in retinal
ganglion cells of salamanders (Schwartz and Berry 2008), as well as in sensory areas in humans (Herrmann
2001; Williams et al. 2004; Mathewson et al. 2012; Cravo et al. 2013; Nozaradan et al. 2011).
However, a major open question is whether speci c frequency bands play privileged roles in regulating
neural excitability according to the rhythmic temporal structure of events. So far, the results suggest
entrainment of neural activity to the pace of external events, but there may be constraints according to
p. 687 intrinsic brain rhythms and entrainment within di erent frequency ranges may have di erent
modulatory consequences. Schroeder and Lakatos (2009a, 2009b; Schroeder et al. 2010) suggest a primary
role for endogenous low-frequency delta and theta rhythms in guiding active sensing of environmental
stimuli. Active sensing mechanisms may, in turn, be shaped by or aligned to motor sampling mechanisms,
such as the rates of saccades (Bosman et al. 2009) or speech prosody (Ghazanfar et al. 2013). Separately,
entrainment of alpha-band activity, which has been particularly implicated in mediating visual excitability,
has been proposed as a mechanism for selective temporal attention based on rhythms (Mathewson et al.
2009; Jensen et al. 2012; Hanslmayr et al. 2011). Future studies varying entrainment rhythms systematically
will be needed in order to explore this basic and important issue.
The sources and extent of neural modulation by rhythmic context also remain to be characterized. The
endeavour may prove challenging, as the temporal correlations inherent in tasks manipulating stimulus
rhythms complicate the use of hemodynamic imaging methods with low temporal resolution, such as
functional magnetic-resonance imaging (fMRI), which provide good spatial sampling across the brain.
Furthermore, hemodynamic measures may not be sensitive to mechanisms relying on changes in timing or
synchronization of brain activity. Besle and colleagues (2011) were able to observe large-scale entrainment
of brain areas by using intracranial electrocortical recordings in human epilepsy patients. They used an
adaptation of the intermodal attention task used by Lakatos (2008, 2009). Modulation of low-frequency
activity entrained to the stimulation was not con ned to primary visual areas, but instead occurred over a
large number of brain areas, including higher order cortices implicated in control functions. The authors
noted considerable overlap in the network of modulated areas with those implicated in cued temporal
orienting tasks (Coull and Nobre 1998; see below). This large-scale rhythmic entrainment of brain areas

may occur locally and become coordinated across brain areas through bootstrapping. Alternatively, there
may be a centralized mechanism, which in turn coordinates oscillatory entrainment. A combination of both
local and central mechanisms is also possible.
Studies are also beginning to explore the role temporal expectations play in organizing and facilitating
higher order cognitive functions involving rhythmic patterns of stimulation, such as music (e.g. Gordon et
al. 2011; Nozaradan et al. 2011; Large and Snyder 2009; Tillmann 2012), language (e.g. Ghazanfar et al. 2013;
Hoch et al. 2013; Astheimer and Sanders 2009, 2011, 2012; Schmidt-Kassow and Kotz 2009; Power et al.
2012; Kotz et al. 2009), and sensory-motor coordination (Fujioka et al. 2012). As investigations progress, it
will be interesting to investigate temporal expectations that occur in the context of complex, non-
isochronous rhythms (Chapin et al. 2010; Large et al. 2002). Initial studies have started to reveal interesting
e ects of temporal sequences involving non-isochronous repeating patterns of intervals on implicit
learning (Olson and Chun 2001; O’Reilly et al. 2008a). Interestingly, a striking interaction was also noted
between implicit learning of a repeating sequence of temporal intervals and a sequence of stimulus
locations in facilitating response times in a serial reaction-time task (O’Reilly et al. 2008a)—echoing the
synergistic e ects noted between temporal and spatial expectations in the visual task by Doherty and
p. 688 colleagues (2005), and between temporal expectations and task-relevant tone frequencies in the
auditory task by Lakatos and colleagues (2013). Whereas no implicit learning of temporal sequences was
observed when the stimulus location was uncertain, temporal sequences ampli ed the implicit learning of
spatial sequences enormously.
Hazards
Predictable temporal structure of events is not con ned to rhythmic contexts. Any reoccurring episode may
contain temporal predictions about the sequence and timing of its events. The conditional probability of an
event occurring at a speci ed time given that it has not yet occurred is known as the ‘hazard function’ (Luce
1986).
Most psychophysical or cognitive tasks have temporal predictions embedded within their task structure (see
Gri n and Nobre 2005). In warning-signal tasks, conditional probabilities of target events increase with
the passage of time, and can become sharply tuned to speci c moments when the foreperiod before the
target is xed. The importance of foreperiod duration and regularity has been acknowledged since the
classic warning-period studies (Woodrow 1914; reviewed in Niemi and Näätänen 1981). In tasks with
variable foreperiods, the sequence of intervals across trials may also in uence response times (Woodrow
1914), and the resulting response time is dictated by a combination of foreperiod sequence e ects and
hazard rates (e.g. Los and Agter 2005). In the earlier literature, foreperiod e ects were often treated as
re ecting general mechanisms for non-speci c preparation for the target (e.g. Bertelson 1967; Niemi and
Näätänen 1981), and sometimes linked to e ects of general alertness (Posner and Boies 1971). More
recently, active and selective mechanisms of temporal anticipation are increasingly acknowledged to
contribute to foreperiod e ects (see Nobre et al. 2007).
Hazard rates have been shown to in uence many types of behaviour. Proactive anticipation of target
timings is clearly evident in smooth-pursuit tasks, in which eye position often leads a temporally
anticipated change in target trajectory (e.g. de Hemptinne et al. 2007, 2010; Barnes and Asselman 1991).
Anticipatory saccades (Kingstone and Klein 1993) and manual responses (Nickerson 1965) are also common
in simple detection tasks using constant, predictable intervals. Regular, predictable timings for target
appearance can also a ect perceptual judgements: improving thresholds for luminance, orientation, and
stereoscopic discriminations (Lasley and Cohn 1981; Westheimer and Ley 1996); increasing accuracy for
discriminating targets under high perceptual demands Rolke and Hofmann 2007; reviewed in Rolke and
Ulrich 2010); and attenuating attentional blink (Shen and Alain 2012).
Sophisticated psychophysical experiments combined with computational modelling are beginning to be

carried out to characterize the e ects of hazard rates on di erent stages of information processing. At this
p. 689 stage, it is worth bearing in mind that multiple levels of in uence may occur and di erentially in uence
performance depending on the perceptual, mnemonic, and motoric demands in the task. Using an
unspeeded task and modelling of processing parameters according to the ‘theory of visual attention’ (TVA)
(Bundesen 1990; Bundesen et al. 2011) (see also Bundesen and Habekost (in chapter 37), this volume),
Vangkilde and colleagues (2012) found that hazard-rate manipulations primarily a ected the speed of
encoding items into visual short-term memory, rather than the temporal threshold for perception (but see
also Seifried et al. 2010; Bausenhart et al. 2008, 2010). Using a xed-foreperiod manipulation as well as a
temporal cueing paradigm (see below) combined with a type of drift-di usion model (Ratcli and Rouder
1998), Jepma and colleagues (2012) concluded that temporal expectation a ected the duration of non-
decision processes, such as target encoding or response preparation, but had little e ect on the rate of
evidence accumulation or on setting the response threshold (see also Seibold et al. 2011). These results are
qualitatively di erent from our results using rhythms to manipulate temporal expectations (Cravo et al.
2013; Rohenkohl et al. 2012a, 2012b). These interesting discrepancies call for additional rigorous and
systematic studies using computational models to compare the e ects of temporal expectations induced by
di erent procedures (e.g. rhythmic contexts vs. hazard rates) and under di ering perceptual, mnemonic,
and motor demands. For now, it is safe to conclude that manipulations of hazard rates, like rhythmic
contexts, exert strong and reliable in uences over information processing in tasks emphasizing perceptual
discrimination or speeded responses.
Neuronal Mechanisms
Hazard rates have been shown to in uence activity across multiple brain areas. Single-unit and local eld
potential studies in animal models have revealed modulations in striate and extrastriate visual cortices
(Ghose and Bearl 2010; Ghose and Maunsell 2002; Shuler and Bear 2006); parietal area LIP (Janssen and
Shadlen 2005; Premereur et al. 2012), motor and premotor cortices (Riehle et al. 1997; Lucchetti and Bon
2001; Heinen and Liu 1997; Renoult et al. 2006); striatal and prefrontal cortices (Jin et al. 2009; Tsujimoto
and Sawaguchi 2005; Roesch and Olson 2005); and subcortical reward-related areas (Hollerman and Schultz
1998; Fiorillo et al. 2003; Bermudez et al. 2012). Non-invasive studies in humans have also indicated
modulation across large networks of brain areas, including sensory and motor areas, depending on task
parameters (e.g. Bueti et al. 2010; Schubotz and von Cramon 2001; Cui et al. 2009; Coull and Nobre 2008;
Cravo et al. 2011b; Scho elen et al. 2005). Findings using single-unit recordings in sensory cortices and in
sensorimotor areas implicated in the control of attention are of particular interest to understanding how
temporal expectations can contribute to attentional modulation of perception.
Sensory areas
Ghose and Maunsell (2002) were the rst to note modulation of neuronal activity in a visual area by
temporal expectation. They observed that the top-down anticipatory e ects of spatial attention on the
ring rates of neurones in visual area V4 followed the hazard rate predicting the timing of the change in a
p. 690 target stimulus that the monkey had to report (Fig. 24.5a). They demonstrated convincingly the
modulation of the spatial attention e ect by temporal expectations by introducing bimodal hazard rates,
which yielded a bimodal ampli cation pattern of the spatial attention e ects. These results, like those in the
human ERP study by Doherty and colleagues (2005) manipulating temporal and spatial expectations, point
to the ability of temporal expectations to tune modulation of neuronal activity based on other receptive-
eld properties.

Figure 24.5
E ect of hazard rates on neural activity related to perception and action. (a) Findings from Ghose and Maunsell (2002) showing
that activity in V4 (solid line) follows the conditional probability distribution (dashed line) of target occurrence in a spatial
attention task. Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature, 419 (6907), Geo rey M. Ghose and John H. R.
Maunsell, Attentional modulation in visual cortex depends on task timing, pp. 616–620, copyright 2002, Macmillan Publishers
Ltd. (b) Findings from Janssen and Shadlen (2006). Two distinct ʻanticipation functionsʼ for target appearance, and LIP responses
corresponding to the anticipation functions in a delayed-saccade task. Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd:
Nature Neuroscience, 8(2), Peter Janssen and Michael N Shadlen, A representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque
area LIP, pp. 234–241, copyright 2005, Macmillan Publishers Ltd. (c) Results reported by Scho elen et al. (2005). Top panel shows
hazard rate (grey line) with the resulting reaction times (pink line). Note the inverted reaction-time axis at the right. Middle panel
shows the time course of power change in gamma (red) and beta (blue) band. Grey lines represent scaled copies of the hazard
rate. Bottom panel shows that the time course of corticospinal coherence in the gamma-band (40 to 70 Hz) also follows the
hazard rate. From Science, 308 (5718), Wendy Winckler, Simon R. Myers, Daniel J. Richter, Robert C. Onofrio, Gavin J. McDonald,
Ronald E. Bontrop, Gilean A. T. McVean, Stacey B. Gabriel, David Reich, Peter Donnelly, and David Altshuler, Comparison of Fine-
Scale Recombination Rates in Humans and Chimpanzees, pp. 111–113 (c) 2005, The American Association for the Advancement
of Science. Reprinted with permission from AAAS.
More recently, Ghose and Bearl (2010) measured neuronal activity in visual area MT in a task requiring
detection of a very brief motion pulse in one of two locations. The probability of the pulse occurring at each
location (with 0.95 to 0.98 certainty) alternated in a square-wave function of a constant period (0.5 Hz or
p. 691 1.33 Hz in di erent conditions). In addition, the direction and duration of the motion pulse were kept
constant, so that it was also possible to predict the nature of the anticipated stimulus. Behavioural
performance was strongly correlated to the spatial and temporal probability of pulse appearance, with
animals displaying near optimal spatiotemporal integration when pulses were likely (see also Ghose 2006).
Reverse-correlation analysis showed dynamic modulation of receptive eld properties in MT over a sub-
second timescale according to changing spatiotemporal expectations. Again, these ndings indicate strong
interactions between temporal and spatial expectations.
A recent study by Lima and colleagues (2011) demonstrates that temporal expectation can modulate sensory
processing as early as in primary visual cortex (V1). A simple detection task was used, requiring monkeys to
release a lever upon a change in the colour of the xation point. Task-irrelevant visual stimuli were
presented to drive and measure changes in visual excitability according to temporal expectations. Temporal
expectations were manipulated in di erent ways over three experimental protocols. One experiment in
particular introduced a clear hazard-rate manipulation (Experiment 2, block protocol), in which the
probability for the imperative stimulus appearing at one of two intervals (1600 or 3600 ms) was changed
between experimental blocks (Fig. 24.6a). Targets occurred at the probable interval on 85% of trials. Power
and coherence of gamma-band activity increased during the foreperiod and was modulated by the hazard
rates (see also Liang et al. 2005). Increases in gamma-band activity were paralleled by decreases in alpha-
band activity. Gamma and alpha modulation developed signi cantly earlier in blocks in which targets were
expected early (Fig. 24.6a). Changes of oscillatory activity were not con ned to the spatially attended
location. Instead, comparable e ects on gamma-band activity occurred for stimuli at attended, foveal, as
well as for unattended, peripheral locations.
Jaramillo and Zador (2011) studied the neuronal mechanisms of temporal expectations in primary auditory
cortex (A1) of rats. Auditory targets occurred embedded in tone sequences at one of two interval periods
(300–450 or 1350–1500 ms). Temporal expectation was manipulated in a blocked manner, so that targets
appeared early or late on 85% of trials in ‘expect-early’ or ‘expect-late’ blocks respectively. Behavioural
results revealed temporal expectation improved both reaction times and accuracy. Temporal expectations

also modulated local eld potentials and ring rates in primary auditory cortex, and these e ects correlated
with the behavioural performance on a trial-by-trial basis (Fig. 24.6b). Reversible lesions of the auditory
cortex diminished the behavioural e ect, con rming its causal involvement in using temporal predictions
to enhance performance. Together, these results indicate that modulation of early sensory areas can
mediate behavioural advantages conferred by temporal expectations.
Sensorimotor and motor areas

Parietal area LIP has been strongly implicated in regulating control of spatial attention (see Bisley and
Goldberg 2010; Gottlieb 2007; see also Gottlieb (in chapter 12), this volume). This area may provide a nexus
for integrating signals from di erent perceptual modalities, reward prediction, motor intention, and task
p. 692 set. These qualities, combined with its involvement in sensorimotor integration for oculomotor control,
place LIP in a strong position to in uence ongoing perceptual analysis. Janssen and Shadlen (2005) showed
that ring rates in LIP neurons vary systematically with hazard-rate functions in anticipation of ‘go’
stimuli prompting saccade in a delayed saccade task (Fig. 24.5b). More recently, Janssen and colleagues have
started investigating the e ects of temporal expectation on local eld potentials and induced oscillations
during visually guided and memory-guided saccade tasks and during passive visual xation (Premereur et
al. 2012). They found that gamma-band activity encoded the location of the saccade, but decreased during
the foreperiod before the saccade. In contrast, alpha- and beta-band activity were less sensitive to saccade
p. 693 location but increased with temporal probability during the foreperiod. Interestingly, signi cant time-
locked local eld potentials and multi-unit responses also occurred at the anticipated time of the go
stimulus, even when this stimulus was omitted.
Figure 24.6

E ects of hazard rates on early sensory areas. (a) Schematic of the task used in Lima et al. (2011). In a block design, monkeys
were required to respond to a small change in the fixation point. During expect-early blocks, the fixation point change occurred
for most of the cases (85%) early in the trial, at 1600 ms. Only rarely (15% of the cases, catch trials) did the change occur late in
the trial, at 3600 ms. In expect-late blocks, the probabilities of fixation point change were reversed. Scatterplots comparing LFP
power in the alpha and gamma band on expected versus unexpected stimuli in V1 (Lima et al. 2011). Note how there is a
decrease in alpha and an increase in gamma power for high compared with low temporal expectation. Reprinted by permission
from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature Neuroscience, 14(2), Santiago Jaramillo and Anthony M. Zador, The auditory cortex
mediates the perceptual e ects of acoustic temporal expectation, pp. 246–251, copyright 2011, Macmillan Publishers Ltd. (b)
Findings from Jaramillo and Zador (2011). Similarly to the protocol used in Lima et al. (2011), here rats were rewarded for
discriminating target sounds presented at 350 or 450 ms in expect-early blocks and 1350 or 1500 ms during late blocks.
Responses of a single neuron in A1 show increased spiking rate in anticipation of the target under early (blue) compared to late
(red) temporal expectations when the stimulus parameters were equated. Note how the greatest di erence in evoked activity is
seen for the tone that immediately preceded the early target (450 ms). Bottom panel shows the results of the inactivation
experiments presented by Jaramillo and Zador (2011), showing that bilateral inactivation of A1 reliably impaired the
performance in the task. Reprinted from Lima, B., Singer, W., Neuenschwander, S., Gamma responses correlate with temporal
expectation in monkey primary visual cortex, 31(44), pp. 15919–15931 © 2011, The Society for Neuroscience.
Scho elen and colleagues (2005) showed strong e ects of hazard rates at the end of the information-
processing pathway. They examined the e ects of hazard-rate manipulations on motor excitability in a
simple reaction-time task, measuring the temporal evolution of coherence between motor cortex and spinal
cord neurons. Both reaction times and the strength of cortico–spinal coherence in the gamma-band
followed the hazard-rate function (Fig. 24.5c). A study of ours in humans using a simple reaction-time task
and EEG recordings also showed co-variation of response times and motor excitability with the hazard rates
(Cravo et al. 2011b).

How modulations by temporal expectations in sensorimotor areas, like LIP, relate to those in sensory areas,
like V4, MT, V1, or A1, is unknown. Principles of organization in modulatory mechanisms of temporal
expectation still remain to be revealed. At this point it is unclear whether coordination of modulatory
mechanisms across large networks of regions is required to bring about behavioural bene ts; whether
central sources of temporal expectation are required to drive these e ects; or whether localized
mechanisms occurring at stages of processing that are most relevant for task performance are su cient. In
order to tease apart the degree and direction of in uence among di erent brain areas across di erent
frequency bands and ring rates, it will be important to use similar measures of spiking and oscillatory
neuronal activity across di erent sites and under varying task parameters. Studies using simultaneous
recordings across sites (Buschman and Miller 2009; Bosman et al. 2012; Zhou and Desimone 2011) will be
particularly useful. For example, one interesting puzzle to solve is the observation that alpha-band activity
in LIP increases in anticipation of the imperative signal (Premereur et al. 2012), whereas alpha becomes
desynchronized in V1 (Lima et al. 2011; see also Rohenkohl and Nobre 2011).
It will also be important to understand whether in uences of temporal expectations driven by rhythms and
hazard rates are supported by co-extensive mechanisms. Some of the mechanisms proposed to support
increases in sensory excitability in rhythmic context do not translate onto hazard-rate contexts in a trivial
way. Activity in lower-frequency, delta and theta, bands is often suppressed in perceptual tasks that may be
subject to hazard-rate e ects. Furthermore, it is di cult to conceive how up-regulation of a speci c
frequency band, and cross-frequency coupling to that carrier frequency, can account for facilitatory e ects
of complex manipulations of hazard rates, such as bimodal (Ghose and Maunsell 2002; Janssen and Shadlen
2005) or alternating (Ghose and Bearl 2010) distributions of stimulus intervals. It is possible that common
underlying mechanisms for regulation of neuronal excitability account for e ects in predictable rhythmic
and hazard-rated contexts. For example, these could rely on dynamic combinations of oscillatory activity
across di erent frequencies. However, it is also prudent to entertain the possibility of multiple, dissociable
p. 694 sources of in uences related to the temporal expectations.
Cues

The early foreperiod studies, as well as the more recent work on rhythms and hazard rates, left open the
question about whether temporal expectations are under exible, voluntary control. One possible
interpretation was that increases in preparatory processes with the passage and predictability of time occur
automatically and outside voluntary control. Another, more interesting possibility was that foreknowledge
about predicted or relevant time intervals could be used to orient attention voluntarily and exibly to a
point in time in order to optimize behaviour.
Coull and Nobre (1998) adapted the spatial orienting task developed by Posner (1978, 1980) in order to
investigate whether it was possible to orient attention voluntarily to temporal instants, analogously to our
ability to orient attention to spatial locations, objects, or features (Fig. 24.7a). Symbolic cues were
introduced to predict the time interval after which a target stimulus would appear. In this rst experiment,
predictive temporal cues (80% validity) were crossed factorially with predictive spatial cues (80% validity).
Targets could appear at one of two intervals (300 or 1500 ms) and at one of two locations (left or right
peripheral locations), and required a simple detection response. Relative to a neutral-cue condition, both
temporal and spatial valid cues conferred signi cant behavioural advantages. In fact, behavioural bene ts
for temporal cues were larger than those for spatial cues. Because of changes in the hazard rates over time,
targets are always 100% certain to occur at the long interval if they have not already occurred earlier.
Accordingly, temporal cues led to equivalent performance at the long-interval condition, independently of
whether the cue was valid (long-interval cued) or invalid (short-interval cued). This study opened up the
investigation of voluntary orienting of attention based on the predicted timing of events.
Several behavioural studies have replicated and extended the e ects of temporal orienting. In our
laboratory, e ects were shown with peripheral and foveal targets; in simple detection and in discrimination
tasks; using predictive and instructive cues; using cues of di erent shapes; and over di erent interval
ranges (see Gri n et al. 2001, 2002; Miniussi et al. 1999). In a related experiment, Correa and colleagues
(2004) demonstrated that the bene ts of temporal cues were not dependent on e ects of foreperiod
duration or sequence. All of our early experiments emphasized response speed and used tasks with relatively
low perceptual demands. Using event-related potentials in these types of task, we found that the substantial
bene ts of temporal orienting were supported by a set of mechanisms that was qualitatively di erent from
the modulatory mechanisms described for spatial orienting. In the absence of spatial certainty or spatial
cueing, the early visual P1 potential was una ected by temporal orienting. The most reliable modulatory
e ects were the attenuation of a frontally distributed N2 potential followed by an earlier rise and peak of the
late positive centro-parietal ‘P3’ potential, as well as an increase in its amplitude (Gri n et al. 2002;
Miniussi et al. 1999). This pattern of e ects is similar to that which we observed in experiments using
p. 695 rhythmic apparent motion to manipulate temporal expectation in the absence of spatial certainty
(Doherty et al. 2005; Correa and Nobre 2008; see above). Using a series of foveal temporal cueing tasks of
this type, Zanto and colleagues (2011) replicated the behavioural and neural e ects of temporal orienting
under detection, discrimination, and go/no-go conditions. Interestingly, they found that these e ects were
highly sensitive to ageing; proactive voluntary use of temporal cues was not observed in groups of elderly
(62–82-year-old) participants.
Figure 24.7

Behavioural e ects of temporal cueing. (a) Schematic of the temporal orienting task, and interaction between temporal cues
(valid × invalid) and cue-target interval (short × long) obtained in Coull and Nobre (1998). Temporal orienting cues significantly
diminished response times to targets appearing at the short interval. (b) Results of an ongoing study using symbolic temporal
orienting cues in a perceptually demanding task requiring participants to discriminate a peripheral target (low contrast)
followed by a backward pattern mask. The cues in this task were 100% spatially predictive, according to the direction of the
arrow, and 80% temporally predictive, according to its colour. The results indicate that under these conditions, temporal
orienting not only speeds response times, but also improves perceptual discrimination. In line with the manipulations of
conditional temporal probability, e ects of temporal orienting in (a) and (b) are confined for targets occurring at the short
interval. Reprinted from Coull, J. T., Nobre, A. C., Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to
spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI, 18(18), pp. 7426–7435 © 1998, The Society for
Neuroscience.
Studies using visual tasks with higher perceptual demands suggest that it may be possible for cued temporal
orienting to in uence early stages of visual perceptual processing. For example, Correa and colleagues
p. 696 (2005) found that valid temporal cues enhanced perceptual sensitivity (d′) measures for detecting a
target letter embedded within a stream of letters under rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) conditions.
Using a shape discrimination task, this group also reported modulation of the early visual P1 potential
(Correa et al. 2006). However, some caution is required in interpreting these ndings, since cues predicting
short versus long intervals were also blocked, making this experiment a combination of a cueing and a
blocked hazard-function manipulation.
Jepma and colleagues (2012) used computational modelling to reveal the information processing
parameters in uenced by predictive temporal cueing (400 or 1400 ms, 75% validity) to foveal visual targets
requiring a simple, speeded detection response. Responses were signi cantly speeded to validly cued
targets; the e ects were pronounced at the short foreperiod and for dimmer targets. Model tting indicated
that temporal orienting a ected the duration of processes such as stimulus encoding and/or motor
preparation, which are unrelated to the critical decision-related variables: rate of evidence accumulation or
setting of the decision threshold. These results argue against early perceptual modulation by temporal
cueing in simple visual tasks, and are consistent with the authors’ ndings using a xed-foreperiod
manipulation of the hazard rate during a lexical-decision task (Jepma et al. 2012; Experiment 1, see above).
They are, however, qualitatively di erent from our results using a rhythmic manipulation of temporal
expectation in a perceptually demanding psychophysical task sensitive to changes in contrast sensitivity
(see above Cravo et al. 2013: Rohenkohl et al. 2012a). We have pointed out (Rohenkohl et al. 2012b) that there
may be multiple reasons for the di erence in results; for example, rhythmic temporal expectations may be
more potent at in uencing early visual excitability and/or e ects of temporal expectations may
di erentially re ect bottlenecks in perceptual analysis or response parameters depending on the demands
of the task.
Studies of temporal cueing in the auditory modality, combined with ERP recordings, have consistently
suggested modulation of early perceptual analysis. Valid temporal cues have been reported to enhance the
auditory N1 potential, linked to perceptual analysis in auditory cortex (Lange et al. 2006; Lange and Röder
2006; Lampar and Lange 2011; Sanders and Astheimer 2008; reviewed in Lange and Röder 2010). Similar
auditory modulation has also been observed in an audio-tactile cross-modal study of temporal cueing
(Lange and Röder 2006). However, again, strong conclusions must remain curbed. Most auditory cueing
tasks also contain con ated blocked manipulations of hazard rate, in which cues predicting short or long
intervals occur with higher probability in separate blocks (Lange et al. 2003, 2006; Sanders and Astheimer
2008). No enhancement of the auditory N1 was observed in a predictive temporal cueing experiment using
equiprobable short and long foreperiods within blocks and a target-discrimination task (Lampar and Lange
2011, Experiment 1), though signi cant N1 modulation was observed when cues were instructive (rather
than predictive) and signalled which target interval was relevant for task performance (Experiment 2).
Furthermore, to strengthen conclusions about the role of temporal cueing in modulating early auditory
p. 697 analysis, it will be necessary to measure e ects even earlier, during the rst stages of sensory processing
in primary auditory cortex, which has been shown to be modulated by spatial attention (mid-latency

potentials; see Woldor et al. 1987).
The ability of predictive temporal cues to enhance perceptual analysis is also suggested by their strong
in uence on visibility of second targets in attentional blink tasks. Identi cation of a second target (T2)
presented in a stream presented under RSVP conditions is usually signi cantly compromised when it
follows a previous target (T1) within a brief temporal window (Raymond et al. 1992). However, cues
predicting short intervals between the successive targets greatly diminish this e ect in both vision (Martens
and Johnson 2005) and audition (Shen and Alain 2011). In uences of temporal cueing have also been noted
in tasks tapping into higher levels of stimulus analysis, such as unconscious categorical or semantic
priming in RSVP tasks (Naccache et al. 2002; Kiefer and Brendel 2006; Fabre et al. 2007) or spatial Stroop
tasks (Correa et al. 2010).
We are yet to characterize the gamut of mechanisms by which cued temporal expectations may in uence
di erent stages of stimulus analysis. Whether early, perceptual or later, motor-preparation stages are
a ected may heavily depend on whether, at one extreme, perceptual limits dictate variability in
performance or whether, on the other extreme, perceptual requirements are trivial but instead motor
preparation and selection limit performance. In addition, predictions about other properties of the
anticipated stimulus, such as its location or constituent features, may also interact with temporal orienting
e ects (see Nobre et al. 2012). We are currently investigating some of these issues in the laboratory. In an
ongoing study (unpublished observations), we observe strong e ects of trial-by-trial temporal cueing when
combined with spatial cues on perceptual sensitivity to discriminate the orientation of masked peripheral
visual targets (Fig. 24.7b).
To complete the picture, it will also be important to compare and contrast e ects under similar tasks
between di erent modalities. It is highly probable, for example, that temporal orienting impacts visual and
auditory processing di erently (Nobre 2010). Vision and audition have complementary levels of spatial and
temporal acuity, and it is reasonable to propose that these modalities have evolved to sense the organization
and changes of events along these dimensions di erentially. Audition is characterized by high temporal
sensitivity and acuity, and temporal parameters of stimuli are coded from the earliest, subcortical
processing stages (Viemeister and Plack 1993; Poeppel 2003; Theunissen 2003; Theunissen et al. 2000; King
and Nelken 2009). This sense may therefore contain earlier substrates for and greater sensitivity to
temporal expectations.
Neuronal Mechanisms
To the best of our knowledge, only two studies have used intracranial recordings to investigate how
p. 698 neuronal activity is modulated by temporal cues used to orient attention exibly, in a trial-by-trial
manner. The rst study was by Anderson and Sheinberg (2008), recording from the inferior temporal visual
area IT. Two visual pictures appeared in succession, separated by an interval of one or two seconds (Fig.
24.8a). The rst picture acted as a predictive temporal cue (80% validity) and the second picture, which
could be presented at di erent levels of contrast, prompted the execution of a previously associated left or
right button-press response. Similar to speeded discrimination studies in humans, macaques showed
evidence of using temporally predictive cues in a exible manner. They were signi cantly faster in validly
cued trials, especially at the short foreperiod and for dimmer stimuli. Spiking rates in IT neurons were also
signi cantly enhanced for validly cued target pictures appearing at the short foreperiod compared to

invalidly cued targets appearing at the same time. Increases in anticipatory beta-band power also occurred
during heightened temporal expectation, and there was greater coherence between neuronal ring elicited
by the target and both low (~4 Hz) and higher (beta and gamma band, 32–40 Hz) frequencies of the
underlying eld potential.
Lima and colleagues (2011, see above) also included a temporal cueing condition in their investigation of
temporal expectations in primary visual cortex (Experiment 3, cue protocol). Cues appeared early (1000 ms)
or late (3000 ms) into the trial, and indicated the appearance of the target 800 ms later on the majority of
trials. However, on 10% of trials, cues appeared early (1000 ms) but were only followed by targets 2800 ms
later. Modulations of gamma-band and alpha-band activity were similar to those observed in the blocked
modulation of hazard rates (Experiment 1, sequence protocol), except that no gamma-band enhancement
was observed in anticipation of the target when no stimulus was present within the receptive eld of the
recorded neuron. Gamma-band modulation was dependent on there being a stimulus present to drive the
gamma response (Fig. 24.8b), suggesting that a covert change in the excitability state in visual cortex only
becomes manifest once the cortical circuit is activated by the stimulus. In contrast, anticipatory
desynchronization of alpha-band activity occurred in the presence or absence of a stimulus in the receptive
eld.
Of course, there are striking di erences between these two studies, which make it di cult to extract overall
patterns of neuronal modulation by cued temporal expectations. Recordings are made from di erent visual
areas, using di erent cueing manipulations. Whereas stimuli driving neuronal responses being investigated
are task-relevant and associated with responses and rewards in the study by Anderson and Sheinberg
(2008), the stimuli are unrelated to the task in the study by Lima and colleagues (2011).
More studies will be required, therefore, for de ning the set of cellular modulatory mechanisms of temporal
cueing. It would be straightforward to introduce predictive temporal cues into future single-unit and eld-
potential studies of perception and attention in macaques. Such manipulation would likely yield hugely
informative data that would shed light not only on the putative mechanisms of cued temporal expectations,
but also on the characteristics of the other perceptual and attentional mechanisms under study, with which
p. 699 temporal expectations may interact.
Figure 24.8

Perceptual e ects of temporal cueing. (a) Schematic of the task used in Anderson and Sheinberg (2008). In this study, a first
image of an object cued a temporal delay before a second target image appeared (1000 or 2000 ms later). Cue validity was 80%.
As in human behavioural studies, e ects of temporal orienting were confined to the early foreperiod condition. Spiking rates
were significantly elevated for predicted, attended targets (Early Valid, solid red line) compared to unexpected, invalidly cued
targets at the same time (Early Invalid, dashed red line). Reprinted from Neuropsychologia, 46(4), Britt Anderson and David L.
Sheinberg, E ects of temporal context and temporal expectancy on neural activity in inferior temporal cortex, pp. 947–57,
Copyright (2008), with permission from Elsevier. (b) Results in the second experiment reported by Lima et al. (2011) using
symbolic cues. Here, a slight increase of fixation point luminance predicted that a change in fixation colour (target) would occur
800 ms later. In the Early and Late Cue conditions, the onset of the cue occurred either early or late in the trial, at 1000 ms or at
3000 ms respectively, and the target occurred at the predicted time, 800 ms later (at 1800 or 3800 ms). In the remaining 10% of
the cases (false-cue condition), the cue appeared early in the trial (at 1000 ms), but the fixation point colour change was delayed
until the end of the trial (3800 ms). Gamma power was highest preceding target presentation. Interestingly, note how under the
false-cue condition, gamma oscillations transiently ceased when the target was not presented at the interval indicated by the
cue, then gradually increased again toward the end of the trial. Reprinted from Lima, B., Singer, W., and Neuenschwander, S.,
Gamma responses correlate with temporal expectation in monkey primary visual cortex, 31(44), pp. 15919–31 © 2011, The
Society for Neuroscience.
Control networks
Brain-imaging studies using hemodynamic methods (positron emission tomography (PET) and fMRI) have
implicated the left posterior parietal cortex along the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and in the anterior inferior
parietal lobule, as well as the inferior premotor cortex, in the control of temporal orienting (Cotti et al. 2011;
p. 700 Davranche et al. 2011; Coull et al. 2000, 2001, 2013; Coull and Nobre 1998). This frontoparietal network
appears to re ect a qualitatively distinct sensorimotor circuit compared to that involved in oculomotor
control, which has been strongly implicated in the control of spatial orienting. Its left-hemispheric
dominance and more inferior location suggest that it may comprise inferior parietal and frontal areas
related with preparation and control of manual responses for reaching and grasping (see Krams et al. 1998;
Rushworth et al. 1997). Timing is of particular importance to manual dexterity, and frontoparietal circuits
for manual control may therefore contain ne-scale temporal computations that can support temporal
orienting of attention. Accordingly, it has been suggested that temporal orienting may rely on manual
control circuits in an analogous way to how spatial orienting relies on the oculomotor circuitry (see O’Reilly
et al. 2008b).
The reliability of the involvement of this network in temporal orienting, and especially of the left parietal
cortex, is increasingly clear. The pattern of parietal activations across temporal cueing, and related, tasks is
plotted in a meta-analysis we produced for this chapter (Fig. 24.9). The analysis includes eight studies, and
plots activations induced by the main or simple e ect of temporal orienting. The resulting pattern con rms
the reliability of activations in left IPS, anterior inferior parietal lobule, and premotor cortex. In addition,
reliable activations are also observed in the cerebellum (see also O’Reilly et al. 2008b), although
unfortunately cerebellar activations have not been systematically reported or discussed across studies.
Left parietal cortex is arguably the most reliable site of activation, and tends to be preferentially involved in
temporal orienting compared to other types of orienting. Its activation strength is higher when conditions
of temporal cueing are contrasted to spatial cueing (Coull and Nobre 1998) and when conditions of temporal
cueing are contrasted to cueing of the motor e ector for responding (Cotti et al. 2011). In the latter
experiment, partial overlap was observed between parietal areas involved in temporal orienting and in
preparing to use manual (vs. saccadic) responses, supporting a possible functional overlap between
temporal orienting and manual preparation (Cotti et al. 2011; O’Reilly et al. 2008b). Left intraparietal
activation is observed in tasks requiring unspeeded di cult perceptual discriminations as well as in tasks
requiring speeded motor responses (Davranche et al. 2011). Furthermore, by comparing functional
connectivity between tasks, Davranche and colleagues found that parietal cortex was more strongly
correlated with extrastriate visual cortex in the perceptually demanding task and with premotor cortex in
the speeded motor task. Consistent parietal activations have also been noted in tasks in which temporal
expectations about event timings are induced by predictions based on stimulus motion (Assmus et al. 2003,
2005; Coull et al. 2008b; O’Reilly et al. 2008b).

In contrast, patterns of brain activation in temporal cueing tasks di er from those in tasks that require
participants explicitly to estimate and produce temporal intervals in order to make judgements about the
timing of stimuli or execute timed responses (Coull et al. 2004, 2013). Explicit timing tasks of this sort have
been reported to engage right frontostriatal networks, as well as auditory cortex (see Coull and Nobre 2008;
Nobre and O’Reilly 2004).
Coull and colleagues have interpreted the pattern of results across studies, sensibly and parsimoniously, as
p. 701 implicating the left parietal cortex as an important source of temporal expectations in cueing tasks (Coull
et al. 2008a, 2011; Coull and Nobre 2008). However, it is still worth bearing in mind possible alternatives.
fMRI studies so far have not isolated neural activations speci cally triggered by cues, nor shown direct
in uence of cue-related parietal activations on activations along the information processing stream and
behaviour. The closest we get to this is the recent study by Davranche and colleagues (2011). A competing
possible explanation is that parietal involvement in temporal cueing tasks re ects modulation of target-
related processes. Multiple candidate functions remain in play, since similar posterior parietal areas have
been implicated in accumulation of sensory evidence (Gold and Shadlen 2007; Yang and Shadlen 2007;
Gould et al. 2012), limitations in perceptual detection or working-memory capacity (Marois and Ivano
2005; Tosoni et al. 2004; Heekenren et al. 2004), and motor preparation (Krams et al. 1998; Rushworth et al.
1997).
Figure 24.9
Activation likelihood estimation (ALE—GingerALE 2.0 so ware) maps for temporal orienting studies. Eight studies were included
in the meta-analysis (Coull and Nobre 1998—Exp. 1 and 2; Coull et al. 2000, 2001, 2012a, 2012b; Cotti et al. 2011; Davranche et al.
3
p. 722 2012). Values are significant at FDR q < 0.05, minimum cluster size > 200 mm .
The limitations of the fMRI methodology pose particular problems when trying to pinpoint the speci c
functional contributions of parietal and other putative areas to top-down control of temporal orienting.
Hemodynamic measures are slow and therefore susceptible to e ects of di erential temporal correlations
among task events. Temporal cueing, by its very nature, requires systematic manipulations of temporal
correlations. The rapid pace, and di erential correlations among events in temporal cueing tasks greatly
complicate the dissecting out of activations speci cally related to top-down control versus target-related
p. 702 analysis. Complementary problems in spatial resolution plague studies using electroencephalography or
event-related potentials. We are currently using magnetoencephalography with the goal of investigating
the time course of involvement of parietal and other brain areas during temporal orienting based on trial-
by-trial cues.
Temporal cueing studies using event-related potentials have consistently shown modulation of the
contingent negative variation (CNV) (Walter et al. 1964) during selective temporal anticipation of target
events (e.g. Zanto et al. 2011; Miniussi et al. 1999; Los and Heslenfeld 2005; Capizzi et al. 2013). The time
course of the CNV follows that of cued temporal expectation. The potential develops more sharply in
anticipation of target events at shorter intervals, building up to a common maximum level at the anticipated
time of the target event. Similar CNV modulation is observed in explicit timing tasks, for example, in which
participants have to judge the duration of a target stimulus relative to a standard (Macar et al. 2004; Pfeuty
et al. 2005). It is di cult to conclude whether the CNV modulation in cued temporal orienting tasks and in

explicit timing tasks taps into a common timing mechanism used both for orienting and for timing, or
whether temporal orienting is used to optimize perceptual and decision-making processes in explicit timing
tasks. This common pattern of CNV build-up mirrors the gradual and systematic increases in neuronal
ring rates in parietal (Janssen and Shadlen 2005; Leon and Shadlen 2003), motor (Renoult et al. 2006;
Riehle et al. 1997), premotor (Akkal et al. 2004; Lucchetti and Bon 2001), and prefrontal (Niki and Watanabe
1979) regions in motor and timing tasks. Most likely, CNV modulation in temporal cueing tasks re ects
proactive preparation and/or synchronization processes linked to sensorimotor integration and motor
preparation; which can occur independently of perceptual modulation (Nobre and Coull 2010; Nobre and
O’Reilly 2004; Nobre 2001).
Not many human temporal cueing studies have reported anticipatory e ects related to optimization of
perceptual analysis. However, this may simply re ect the use of tasks with low perceptual demands and the
lack of analysis of induced oscillatory activity in earlier studies (e.g. Miniussi et al. 1999). More recently,
Zanto and colleagues (2011) found enhanced alpha-band desynchronization when young adults anticipated
targets at shorter versus longer intervals (see also Babiloni et al. 2004). These ndings are similar to what is
observed with rhythmic modulation of temporal expectations for visual stimuli (Praamstra et al. 2006;
Rohenkohl and Nobre 2011), and in intracranial recordings during temporal cueing or blocked foreperiod
manipulations in the macaque (Lima et al. 2011). More reports of anticipatory modulatory mechanisms are
expected as more studies get under way.

The growing literature on temporal cueing has already made some signi cant contributions to our
p. 703 understanding of attentional biasing. Going beyond the literatures on foreperiod, rhythms, and hazard
rates, cueing studies show that temporal anticipation of events is under exible and voluntary control. The
e ects are robust and occur across a variety of task settings and in di erent modalities.
Investigations of neural modulatory mechanisms are still relatively few. We lack a full picture, and it is
likely that more temporal modulatory mechanisms will be discovered. But we have already learned that
similar bene ts of spatial and temporal orienting observed at the behavioural level can result from
markedly di erent underlying neural mechanisms (Gri n et al. 2002). Cueing studies will be particularly
useful in determining whether there are dedicated networks for top-down control of temporal expectations,
and for separating these from mechanisms at the sites of modulation. It is a real possibility that the exible
deployment of temporal expectations relies on exible temporal organization of activity within networks of
brain areas participating in the task. Assuming there are dedicated networks for top-down control, these
may be di cult to isolate because of methodological di culties. Convergence across tasks and across
methods, including imaging (magnetoencephalography) and interference (transcranial magnetic
stimulation) methods with high temporal resolution, will be essential.
So far, studies in di erent modalities suggest that we are not heading toward an equivalence of modulatory
mechanisms. Instead, temporal biases may in uence di erent stages of information processing, and in
di erent ways across the senses. Temporal biases may also interact di erently with other biases about other
stimulus attributes or action intentions. The initial ndings remind us that our senses are not redundant,
but most likely evolved to provide complementary sources of information about the external environment.
Conclusions and Open Questions
Types of temporal biases

We have discussed three types of temporal biases, but now we have to admit that this subdivision is
somewhat arbitrary, possibly acting as a placeholder for subsequent, better-informed categorizations. We
have focused on temporal biases concerned with short temporal intervals that frame the timing of cognitive
functions (sub-second to seconds). These operate within slower uctuations that may alter the cognitive
and emotional state in our system, such as those related to circadian rhythms. There may also be much
faster temporal regulatory mechanisms that ne-tune perceptual or motor processing beyond the scope of
our awareness.

Within the ‘interval timing’ stretch we discussed, behavioural modulations—‘foreperiod e ects’—can arise
from the length, regularity, sequence, contextual conditional probability, cued probability, and cued
relevance of an event. At the moment it is unclear how many underlying types of temporal biases may carry
p. 704 these e ects. Behavioural performance may also be a ected by temporally non-speci c transient
changes in alertness (Posner and Boies 1971; Petersen and Posner 2012; Posner and Petersen 1990), which
may interact with selective temporal biases (as well as other types of biases) to modulate their e ects (see
Nobre et al. 2012). We have proposed three major classes of selective temporal biases, guided by the
subdivisions and distinctions in the literature, combined with our synthesis and analyses of the various
ndings. Re ning our understanding of the number and nature of the essential temporal biasing
mechanisms that adapt our perception on a moment-to-moment basis should remain a priority area for
research.
Looking back at the e ects of temporal expectations produced by rhythms, hazards, and cues, we can note
many similarities. All types of manipulations lead to modulations of anticipatory CNV potentials, at least in
tasks that require speeded responses (Praamstra et al. 2006; Cravo et al. 2011b; Miniussi et al. 1999; Hackley
et al. 2007; Los and Heslenfeld 2005; Muller-Gethmann et al. 2003). Temporal expectations also tune
desynchronization of alpha-band activity in anticipation of targets in a variety of tasks manipulating
rhythms, hazards, and cueing (Rohenkohl and Nobre 2011; Praamstra et al. 2006; Lima et al. 2011). This
e ect, however, is not apparent in all rhythmic tasks (e.g. Cravo et al. 2013; Lakatos et al. 2008), and has not
been well investigated in human studies using temporal cues. Modulations of event-related potentials
triggered by targets are also similar in rhythmic and cued attention tasks (e.g. Correa and Nobre 2008;
Doherty et al. 2005; Gri n et al. 2002; Miniussi et al. 1999).
But there are also some di erences. For example, in audition, regular rhythms were found to attenuate the
N1 potential elicited by targets falling on the predicted beat (Lange 2009, 2010), while temporally predictive
cues (presented in a blocked fashion) lead to enhancement of the auditory N1 potential (Lange and Röder
2006; Lange et al. 2003, 2006). By directly comparing cued versus rhythmic temporal expectations in a
visual task, we showed that bene ts were functionally dissociable. In a rhythmic motion task, additive
performance bene ts were provided by temporal predictions based on the colour (cueing) or the pace
(rhythm) of the moving disc (Rohenkohl et al. 2011). Furthermore, e ects of rhythmic expectations were
independent of strategic factors, whereas e ects of cueing were dependent upon instructions to attend to
the colour cues. We concluded that rhythmic cues triggered an automatic, exogenous type of temporal
orienting, while symbolic cues relied on an endogenous mechanism; and proposed an analogy to the
distinction made between exogenous vs. endogenous orienting of spatial attention (Posner 1980; Posner
and Boies 1971). De la Rosa and colleagues (2012) also found e ects of rhythmic temporal orienting to be
independent of cognitive control. A concurrent working-memory task interferes with performance bene ts
conferred by temporal cueing but not with bene ts from temporal rhythms. Similarly, sequential e ects are
una ected by concurrent working memory tasks that disrupt temporal cueing (Capizzi et al. 2012, 2013).
De cits in patients with lesions in the left vs. right frontal lobes also suggest functional dissociations
among temporal e ects related to rhythms, hazards, and cues (Trivino et al. 2010). Right frontal lesions
were found to disrupt temporal cueing selectively, and left frontal lesions to disrupt bene ts from rhythms
p. 705 and constant foreperiods. Sequential e ects remained una ected by either type of lesion.
Di erent sources and mechanisms contributing to temporal expectations may contribute to discrepancies
noted in performance bene ts in di erent studies. For example, stronger and more automatic e ects of
temporal rhythm may make it easier to modulate early levels of stimulus analysis, such as those related to
contrast sensitivity and accumulation of perceptual evidence for subsequent decision-making (Cravo et al.
2013; Rohenkohl et al. 2012a, 2012b). However, in order to understand the contributions of temporal
expectations generated by di erent task manipulations, it will be necessary to compare these using
stimulus parameters and task demands that are otherwise controlled.
Interactions between temporal and other biases

When manipulated separately, e ects of temporal expectations often appear to be independent from those
of spatial expectations (Gri n et al. 2002; MacKay and Juola 2007; Bruchmann et al. 2011; Lange et al.
2006). Cueing temporal intervals also yielded additive e ects to cueing the motor e ector for responding to
a target in a task eliminating speci c spatial expectations about the stimulus or the action to be performed
(Cotti et al. 2011). In contrast, strong interactions are observed when expectations about timing of events are

combined with other selective expectations. In our rst rhythmic manipulation of temporal and spatial
expectations, we noted a striking interaction between these two sources of biases on early stages of analysis
(Doherty et al. 2005). In the absence of spatial certainty, rhythmic temporal expectations had no e ect on
the visual P1 potential. In contrast, temporal expectations greatly magni ed the e ect of spatial attention
on P1 amplitude. The synergy between temporal and spatial expectations was not observed at the
behavioural level, in which additive e ects were obtained; but this may be because the bottleneck for
performance in that particular task may not have been early perceptual analysis. We are currently
investigating whether synergistic e ects of temporal and spatial expectations become manifest in tasks
requiring ne perceptual discriminations under perceptually challenging conditions (see also Milliken et al.
2003, discrimination task). Strong interactions have also been observed between learning temporal and
spatial/motor sequences, even when the sequences in the di erent dimensions are completely orthogonal
(O’Reilly et al. 2008a).
These kinds of observations suggest an intuitive way by which temporal expectations may help guide
selective perception. It is di cult to imagine how isolated temporal expectations can modulate sensory
processing in a proactive and anticipatory manner. Overall changes in sensory excitability by temporal
expectations may be possible, in the form of a transient alerting-like mechanism. However, on its own this
kind of mechanism would not only be metabolically costly, it would also be highly non-selective,
magnifying processing of any and all events, targets and distractors alike, at predicted relevant moments.
However, by interacting with other receptive- eld properties, temporal expectations can adjust proactive
anticipatory biases over time in order to optimize the state of excitability of relevant items at the right time.
Temporal modulation of spatial-attention biases has been noted in single-unit studies in the macaque
p. 706 (Ghose and Bearl 2010; Ghose and Maunsell 2002) and in human EEG studies (Rohenkohl and Nobre 2011;
van Ede et al. 2011). E ects of temporal expectation in non-spatial attention tasks are also suggestive of
interactions between temporal and feature-based expectations (Lakatos et al. 2013; White et al. 2010).
Enhanced preparation of speci c movements and associated neural activity has long been noted in motor
tasks (e.g. Riehle et al. 1997; Lucchetti and Bon 2001; Heinen and Liu 1997; Scho elen et al. 2005; Cravo et al.
2011a).
Stepping back, the idea that temporal expectations combine with foreknowledge about other attributes
makes obvious sense. We struggle to conceive or understand the nature of time in isolation—indeed some
scholars negate its very existence (e.g. Rovelli 2007). In cognition, encoding and sensing of timing may be
intrinsically bound to events and their constituent properties. Expectations are about events and not about
timings or spatial locations in isolation. Events in turn are situated in time and space, and contain
spatiotemporal structure. It will be interesting to continue to explore the synergies between temporal
expectations and expectations about other attributes of task relevant events, such as their locations or
features, as well as expectations about decisions and actions to be taken in response to these events.
Looking at interactions among di erent types of biasing signals will enrich the study of attention in
general, and not only the study of temporal expectations.
Proposed mechanisms
There is still a di cult puzzle to solve: how are temporal expectations coded in the brain in the rst place so
that they can interact with other biases, or change neuronal excitability in their own right? It is early days to
attempt any de nitive answer, but it is probably worth airing brie y di erent types of mechanisms that
have been envisaged so far.
One common starting point is to consider whether temporal expectations rely on the same or similar
mechanisms that might be in place for explicit timing functions in the brain—whatever those turn out to be
(for discussion see Coull and Nobre 2008). If we had a clear understanding of the neural systems and
mechanisms responsible for explicit timing functions, it would be possible to design experiments to
measure or manipulate activity in these areas during tasks manipulating temporal expectations. However,
in its current state, the timing literature provides little guidance. There is still no accepted view on the
networks and mechanisms that support perception of temporal intervals. Traditional proposals for the
existence of an internal clock (Gibbon et al. 1984; Treisman 1963), for keeping time and enabling retrieval
and comparison of stored time intervals, still frame much of contemporary research. Dedicated timing
networks have been proposed to involve frontostriatal circuits (Buhusi and Meck 2005; Coull et al. 2004,
2011). The cerebellum has also been suggested to participate speci cally in the timing of events (Ivry and
Spencer 2004). In contrast, other researchers propose that timing functions occur in a much more widely

distributed fashion, as a common property of many or all neural systems (Mauk and Buonomano 2004;
p. 707 Nobre and O’Reilly 2004). Distortions in temporal perception that are highly speci c to events occurring
within speci c sensory modalities and in speci c locations (e.g. Morrone et al. 2005; Johnston et al. 2006)
suggest the involvement of highly localized mechanisms for time perception. These could support timing
functions in isolation, or interact with centralized timing mechanisms to bring about highly speci c e ects
(Coull et al. 2011).
Within timing systems, be they centralized or distributed, temporal intervals have been proposed to rely on
periodic or oscillatory neural activity (e.g. Buhusi and Meck 2005; Miall 1989; Treisman 1963). Others have
noted that temporal intervals and regularities within a given context may also be encoded through time-
dependent neuronal properties and short-term plasticity mechanisms embedded within neuronal
assemblies (Buonomano and Maass 2009; Karmarkar and Buonomano 2007; Crowe et al. 2010). If such
state-dependent dynamics and plasticity exist, timing signals could be intrinsic to information processing
systems, and these could contribute to optimizing neural processing at anticipated relevant events.
Our current review of the emerging literature on temporal expectations clearly suggests that oscillatory
brain activity may provide an important medium for the coding and integration of temporal expectations in
the brain. The most developed theoretical proposal so far is that of ‘active sensing’ based on rhythmic
sensory sampling of the environment (see above Lakatos et al. 2008, 2009, 2013; Zion Golumbic et al. 2013;
Schroeder et al. 2010; Schroeder and Lakatos 2009b). This proposal combines classic ideas about the
importance of motor control and intention in guiding perception (Liberman and Mattingly 1985; Rizzolatti
et al. 1987, 1994: Schubotz 2007) with the appreciation that many of our e ector systems display rhythmic
activity within frequencies similar to our intrinsic low-frequency oscillations (Schroeder et al. 2010;
Bosman et al. 2009). It suggests that low-frequency oscillations become entrained to the timing of rhythmic
sensory input, occurring naturally within the environment or as a result of rhythmic sampling. This
entrainment regulates neuronal excitability so that it is maximal at the predicted times of relevant events,
and may also serve to coordinate rhythmic changes of neuronal excitability across di erent brain areas
involved in a given task (see Buzsáki 2006). Because of the ebbing and owing of neuronal excitability,
higher frequency oscillations related to stimulus processing or anticipation become nested within the
periods of higher excitability. This process can be repeated, regulating neuronal excitability at multiple
temporal scales. Mounting evidence from human and animal studies supports the viability of such a
mechanism in the context of regular, rhythmic stimulation (e.g. Cravo et al. 2013; Rohenkohl et al. 2012a;
Lakatos et al. 2008, 2009, 2013; Mathewson et al. 2010; Henry and Obleser 2012; de Graaf et al. 2013). Recent
work further points to the ability of such mechanisms to enhance selectively signals related to task-relevant
events, sharpening the contrast between target and distractor processing (Lakatos et al. 2013).
However, it remains unclear whether and how this kind of rhythmic nesting mechanism can be generalized
to conditions in which more complicated hazard functions predict event onsets (e.g. Ghose and Maunsell
2002; Janssen and Shadlen 2005), or during predicted sequences of events (e.g. Olson and Chun 2001;
p. 708 O’Reilly et al. 2008a). In principle, it is possible that elemental rhythmic entrainment mechanisms can
become combined to generate more complex temporal predictions, in a Fourier-like fashion. The biological
plausibility of such a mechanism would have to be ascertained. Conversely, or additionally, short-term
plasticity mechanisms working upon temporal dynamics of neuronal assemblies could reinforce temporal
states of relevant events within given contexts (Buonomano and Maass 2009). To test whether summation
of oscillatory activity at di erent frequencies and/or reinforcement of dynamical states contribute to
complex temporal expectation functions, it may be worth investigating modulation of oscillatory activity
within temporal prediction contexts that vary systematically from isochronous rhythms to complex
predictable temporal sequences of events.
Alpha-band activity has also been consistently linked to anticipatory states in perceptual tasks in visual
(Worden et al. 2000; Thut et al. 2006; van Dijk et al. 2008; Ergenoglu et al. 2004; Hanslmayr et al. 2007;
Romei et al. 2010; Gould et al. 2011) and also other modalities (van Ede et al. 2011; Haegens et al. 2011, 2012).
Di erent theoretical accounts have been suggested for how alpha-band regulates the excitability for
sensory events. For example, Jensen and colleagues have suggested that alpha-band activity re ects activity
in an inhibitory circuit, such that cortical uptake of sensory processing is mainly limited to the periodic
windows of alpha-band desynchronization (Jensen et al. 2012; see also Ray and Cole 1985; Klimesch et al.
2007; Pfurtscheller and Lopes da Silva 1999; Pfurtscheller et al. 1994, 1996). Others have suggested that
alpha desynchronization may also contribute to the organization and support of awareness and
maintenance of sensory representations in short-term memory (Jensen et al. 2012; Palva and Palva 2007).

As we have reviewed, the timing of alpha-band activity in anticipation of sensory stimuli is often modulated
by temporal expectations, with e ects noted in rhythmic (Rohenkohl and Nobre 2011; Praamstra et al. 2006;
Mathewson et al. 2012), hazard-rate (van Ede et al. 2011; Lima et al. 2011), and temporal cueing (Lima et al.
2011; Zanto et al. 2011) tasks. Modulation in the anticipatory alpha-band activity, however, does not always
co-occur with modulation of lower frequency bands suggestive of entrainment to the timing of task-
relevant events (Cravo et al. 2013; Besle et al. 2011; Lakatos et al. 2008). It will be important, therefore, to
test the extent to which modulations of oscillations in alpha and in lower-frequency (delta and theta) bands
express common versus dissociable mechanisms for adjusting and coordinating neural excitability
according to temporal expectations.
Fries and colleagues have recently proposed that alignment of phase coherence among distinct populations
of neurons involved in a task is of central importance for the selection and integration of relevant events
during perception (Bosman et al. 2012; Fries 2009). Modulation of neural activity according to the predicted
timings of events, either through rhythmic entrainment or through other mechanisms, is likely to play a
signi cant role in modulating the e cacy of neuronal communication through their coherence. It will be of
great interest to introduce manipulations of temporal expectation into large-scale multi-site recording
p. 709 studies of selective attention (e.g. Bosman et al. 2012).
References
Akkal, D., Escola, L., Bioulac, B., and Burbaud, P. (2004). Time predictability modulates pre-supplementary motor area neuronal
activity. NeuroReport 15: 1283–12836.
Google Scholar WorldCat
Anderson, B. and Sheinberg, D. L. (2008). E ects of temporal context and temporal expectancy on neural activity in inferior
temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia 46: 947–957.
Assmus, A., Marshall, J. C., Noth, J., Zilles, K., and Fink, G. R. (2005). Di iculty of perceptual spatiotemporal integration
modulates the neural activity of le inferior parietal cortex. Neuroscience 132: 923–927.

Assmus, A., Marshall, J. C., Ritzl, A., Noth, J., Zilles, K., and Fink, G. R. (2003). Le inferior parietal cortex integrates time and space
during collision judgments. NeuroImage 20 Suppl. 1: S82–S88.
Astheimer, L. B. and Sanders, L. D. (2009). Listeners modulate temporally selective attention during natural speech processing.
Biological Psychology 80: 23–34.
Astheimer, L. B. and Sanders, L. D. (2011). Predictability a ects early perceptual processing of word onsets in continuous speech.
Neuropsychologia 49: 3512–3516.
Astheimer, L. B. and Sanders, L. D. (2012). Temporally selective attention supports speech processing in 3- to 5-year-old children.
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 2: 120–128.
Babiloni, C., Miniussi, C., Babiloni, F., Carducci, F., Cincotti, F., Del Percio, C., Sirello, G., Fracassi, C., Nobre, A. C., and Rossini, P. M.
(2004). Sub-second ʻtemporal attentionʼ modulates alpha rhythms: A high-resolution EEG study. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain
Research 19: 259–268.
Barnes, G. R. and Asselman, P. T. (1991). The mechanism of prediction in human smooth pursuit eye movements. Journal of
Physiology 439: 439–461.
Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., Seibold, V. C., and Ulrich, R. (2010). Temporal preparation influences the dynamics of information
processing: Evidence for early onset of information accumulation. Vision Research 50: 1025–1034.
Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., and Ulrich, R. (2008). Temporal preparation improves temporal resolution: Evidence from constant
foreperiods. Perception & Psychophysics 70: 1504–1514.
Bermudez, M. A., Gobel, C., and Schultz, W. (2012). Sensitivity to temporal reward structure in amygdala neurons. Current
Biology 22: 1839–1844.
Bertelson, P. (1967). The time course of preparation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 19: 272–279.
Bertelson, P. and Boons, J. P. (1960). Time uncertainty and choice reaction time. Nature 187: 531–532.
Besle, J., Schevon, C. A., Mehta, A. D., Lakatos, P., Goodman, R. R., McKhann, G. M., Emerson, R. G., and Schroeder, C. E. (2011).
Tuning of the human neocortex to the temporal dynamics of attended events. Journal of Neuroscience 31: 3176–3185.
Bisley, J. W. and Goldberg, M. E. (2010). Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe. Annual Review of Neuroscience 33:
1–21.
Bollimunta, A., Chen, Y., Schroeder, C. E., and Ding, M. (2008). Neuronal mechanisms of cortical alpha oscillations in awake-
behaving macaques. Journal of Neuroscience 28: 9976–9988.
Bollimunta, A., Mo, J., Schroeder, C. E., and Ding, M. (2011). Neuronal mechanisms and attentional modulation of
corticothalamic alpha oscillations. Journal of Neuroscience 31: 4935–4943.
Bosman, C. A., Scho elen, J. M., Brunet, N., Oostenveld, R., Bastos, A. M., Womelsdorf, T., Rubehn, B., Stieglitz, T., De Weerd, P.,
and Fries, P. (2012). Attentional stimulus selection through selective synchronization between monkey visual areas. Neuron 75:
p. 710 875–888.

Bosman, C. A., Womelsdorf, T., Desimone, R., and Fries, P. (2009). A microsaccadic rhythm modulates gamma-band
synchronization and behavior. Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 29: 9471–9480.
Bruchmann, M., Hintze, P., and Mota, S. (2011). The e ects of spatial and temporal cueing on metacontrast masking. Advances in
Cognitive Psychology/University of Finance and Management in Warsaw 7: 132–141.
Bueti, D., Bahrami, B., Walsh, V., and Rees, G. (2010). Encoding of temporal probabilities in the human brain. Journal of
Neuroscience 30: 4343–4352.
Buhusi, C. and Meck, W. (2005). What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. Nature Reviews
Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review 97: 523–547.

Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., and Kyllingsbaek, S. (2011). A neural theory of visual attention and short-term memory (NTVA).
Neuropsychologia 49: 1446–1457.
Buonomano, D. and Maass, W. (2009). State-dependent computations: Spatiotemporal processing in cortical networks. Nature
Reviews Neuroscience 10: 113–125.
Buschman, T. J. and Miller, E. K. (2009). Serial, covert shi s of attention during visual search are reflected by the frontal eye fields
and correlated with population oscillations. Neuron 63: 386–396.
Buzsáki, G. (2006). Rhythms of the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar Google Preview WorldCat COPAC
Canolty, R. T., Edwards, E., Dalal, S. S., Soltani, M., Nagarajan, S. S., Kirsch, H. E., Berger, M. S., Barbaro, N. M., and Knight, R. T.
(2006). High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex. Science 313: 1626–1628.
Capizzi, M., Correa, A., and Sanabria, D. (2013). Temporal orienting of attention is interfered by concurrent working memory
updating. Neuropsychologia 51: 326–339.
Capizzi, M., Sanabria, D., and Correa, A. (2012). Dissociating controlled from automatic processing in temporal preparation.
Cognition 123: 293–302.
Chapin, H. L., Zanto, T., Jantzen, K. J., Kelso, S. J., Steinberg, F., and Large, E. W. (2010). Neural responses to complex auditory
rhythms: The role of attending. Frontiers in Psychology 1: 224.
Correa, A., Cappucci, P., Nobre, A. C., and Lupiáñez, J. (2010). The two sides of temporal orienting: Facilitating perceptual
selection, disrupting response selection. Experimental Psychology 57: 142–148.
Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., Madrid, E., and Tudela, P. (2006). Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: A review and new
evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research 1076: 116–128.
Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., Milliken, B., and Tudela, P. (2004). Endogenous temporal orienting of attention in detection and
discrimination tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 66: 264–278.
Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., and Tudela, P. (2005). Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at
the perceptual level. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12: 328–334.

Correa, A. and Nobre, A. (2008). Neural modulation by regularity and passage of time. Journal of Neurophysiology 100: 1649–
1655.
Cotti, J., Rohenkohl, G., Stokes, M., Nobre, A. C., and Coull, J. T. (2011). Functionally dissociating temporal and motor
components of response preparation in le intraparietal sulcus. NeuroImage 54: 1221–1230.
Coull, J. T., Cheng, R. K., and Meck, W. H. (2011). Neuroanatomical and neurochemical substrates of timing.
p. 711 Neuropsychopharmacology: O icial Publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 36: 3–25.
Coull, J. T., Davranche, K., Nazarian, B., and Vidal, F. (2013). Functional anatomy of timing di ers for production versus prediction
of time intervals. Neuropsychologia 51: 309–319.
Coull, J. T., Frith, C. D., Büchel, C., and Nobre, A. C. (2000). Orienting attention in time: Behavioural and neuroanatomical
distinction between exogenous and endogenous shi s. Neuropsychologia 38: 808–819.
Coull, J. T., Nazarian, B., and Vidal, F. (2008a). Timing, storage, and comparison of stimulus duration engage discrete anatomical
components of a perceptual timing network. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20: 2185–2197.
Coull, J. T. and Nobre, A. C. (1998). Where and when to pay attention: The neural systems for directing attention to spatial
locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. Journal of Neuroscience 18: 7426–7435.
Coull, J. T. and Nobre, A. C. (2008). Dissociating explicit timing from temporal expectation with fMRI. Current Opinion in
Neurobiology 18: 137–144.
Coull, J. T., Nobre, A. C., and Frith, C. D. (2001). The noradrenergic alpha2 agonist clonidine modulates behavioural and
neuroanatomical correlates of human attentional orienting and alerting. Cerebral Cortex 11: 73–84.
Coull, J. T., Vidal, F., Goulon, C., Nazarian, B., and Craig, C. (2008b). Using time-to-contact information to assess potential
collision modulates both visual and temporal prediction networks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2: 10.
Coull, J. T., Vidal, F., Nazarian, B., and Macar, F. (2004). Functional anatomy of the attentional modulation of time estimation.
Science 303: 1506–1508.
Cravo, A. M., Claessens, P. M., and Baldo, M. V. (2011a). The relation between action, predictability and temporal contiguity in
temporal binding. Acta Psychologica 136: 157–166.
Cravo, A. M., Rohenkohl, G., Wyart, V., and Nobre, A. C. (2011b). Endogenous modulation of low frequency oscillations by
temporal expectations. Journal of Neurophysiology 106: 2964–2972.
Cravo, A. M., Rohenkohl, G., Wyart, V., and Nobre, A. C. (2013). Temporal expectation enhances contrast sensitivity by phase
entrainment of low-frequency oscillations in visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for
Crowe, D. A., Averbeck, B. B., and Chafee, M. V. (2010). Rapid sequences of population activity patterns dynamically encode task-
critical spatial information in parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 30:
11640–11653.

Cui, X., Stetson, C., Montague, P. R., and Eagleman, D. M. (2009). Ready...go: Amplitude of the fMRI signal encodes expectation of
cue arrival time. PLoS Biology 7: e1000167.
Davranche, K., Nazarian, B., Vidal, F., and Coull, J. (2011). Orienting attention in time activates le intraparietal sulcus for both
perceptual and motor task goals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 3318–3330.
De Graaf, T. A., Gross, J., Paterson, G., Rusch, T., Sack, A. T., and Thut, G. (2013). Alpha-band rhythms in visual task performance:
Phase-locking by rhythmic sensory stimulation. PLoS One 8: e60035.
De Hemptinne, C., Barnes, G. R., and Missal, M. (2010). Influence of previous target motion on anticipatory pursuit deceleration.
Experimental Brain Research/Experimentelle Hirnforschung/Experimentation cérébrale 207: 173–184.
De Hemptinne, C., Nozaradan, S., Duvivier, Q., Lefevre, P., and Missal, M. (2007). How do primates anticipate uncertain future
events? Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 27: 4334–4341.
De La Rosa, M. D., Sanabria, D., Capizzi, M., and Correa, A. (2012). Temporal preparation driven by rhythms is resistant to working
p. 712 memory interference. Frontiers in Psychology 3: 308.
Doherty, J. R., Rao, A., Mesulam, M. M., and Nobre, A. C. (2005). Synergistic e ect of combined temporal and spatial expectations
on visual attention. Journal of Neuroscience 25: 8259–8266.
Egan, J. P., Greenberg, G. Z., and Schulman, A. I. (1961). Interval of time uncertainty in auditory detection. Journal of Acoustical
Society of America 33: 771–778.
Eimer, M. (1994). ʻSensory gatingʼ as a mechanism for visuospatial orienting: Electrophysiological evidence from trial-by-trial
cuing experiments. Perception & Psychophysics 55: 667–675.
Ergenoglu, T., Demiralp, T., Bayraktaroglu, Z., Ergen, M., Beydagi, H., and Uresin, Y. (2004). Alpha rhythm of the EEG modulates
visual detection performance in humans. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research 20: 376–383.
Fabre, L., Lemaire, P., and Grainger, J. (2007). Attentional modulation of masked repetition and categorical priming in young and
older adults. Cognition 105: 513–532.
Fiorillo, C. D., Tobler, P. N., and Schultz, W. (2003). Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons.
Science 299: 1898–1902.
Foxe, J. J., Simpson, G. V., and Ahlfors, S. P. (1998). Parieto-occipital approximately 10 Hz activity reflects anticipatory state of
visual attention mechanisms. NeuroReport 9: 3929–3933.
Fries, P. (2009). Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation. Annual Review of
Fries, P., Reynolds, J. H., Rorie, A. E., and Desimone, R. (2001). Modulation of oscillatory neuronal synchronization by selective
visual attention. Science 291: 1560–1563.
Fujioka, T., Trainor, L. J., Large, E. W., and Ross, B. (2009). Beta and gamma rhythms in human auditory cortex during musical
beat processing. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1169: 89–92.

Fujioka, T., Trainor, L. J., Large, E. W., and Ross, B. (2012). Internalized timing of isochronous sounds is represented in
neuromagnetic beta oscillations. Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 32: 1791–1802.
Ghazanfar, A. A., Morrill, R. J., and Kayser, C. (2013). Monkeys are perceptually tuned to facial expressions that exhibit a theta-like
speech rhythm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110: 1959–1963.
Ghose, G. M. (2006). Strategies optimize the detection of motion transients. Journal of Vision 6: 429–440.
Ghose, G. M. and Bearl, D. W. (2010). Attention directed by expectations enhances receptive fields in cortical area MT. Vision
Research 50: 441–451.
Ghose, G. M. and Maunsell, J. H. (2002). Attentional modulation in visual cortex depends on task timing. Nature 419: 616–620.
Gibbon, J., Church, R. M., and Meck, W. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 423: 52–
77.
Gold, J. I. and Shadlen, M. N. (2007). The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience 30: 535–574.
Gordon, R. L., Magne, C. L., and Large, E. W. (2011). EEG correlates of song prosody: A new look at the relationship between
linguistic and musical rhythm. Frontiers in Psychology 2: 352.
Gottlieb, J. (2007). From thought to action: The parietal cortex as a bridge between perception, action, and cognition. Neuron 53:
9–16.
Gould, I. C., Nobre, A. C., Wyart, V., and Rushworth, M. F. (2012). E ects of decision variables and intraparietal stimulation on
sensorimotor oscillatory activity in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience
32: 13805–13818.
Gould, I. C., Rushworth, M. F., and Nobre, A. C. (2011). Indexing the graded allocation of visuospatial attention using anticipatory
p. 713 alpha oscillations. Journal of Neurophysiology 105: 1318–1326.
Gri in, I. C., Miniussi, C., and Nobre, A. C. (2001). Orienting attention in time. Frontiers in Bioscience 6: D660–D671.
Gri in, I. C., Miniussi, C., and Nobre, A. C. (2002). Multiple mechanisms of selective attention: Di erential modulation of stimulus
processing by attention to space or time. Neuropsychologia 40: 2325–2340.
Gri in, I. C. and Nobre, A. C. (2005). Temporal orienting of attention. In L. Itti, G. Rees, and J. K. Tsotsos (eds.), Neurobiology of
Attention (pp. 257–263). San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press.
Hackley, S. A., Schankin, A., Wohlschlaeger, A., and Wascher, E. (2007). Localization of temporal preparation e ects via trisected
reaction time. Psychophysiology 44: 334–338.
Haegens, S., Handel, B. F., and Jensen, O. (2011). Top-down controlled alpha band activity in somatosensory areas determines
behavioral performance in a discrimination task. Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 31:
5197–5204.
Haegens, S., Luther, L., and Jensen, O. (2012). Somatosensory anticipatory alpha activity increases to suppress distracting input.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24: 677–685.

Hanslmayr, S., Aslan, A., Staudigl, T., Klimesch, W., Herrmann, C. S., and Bauml, K. H. (2007). Prestimulus oscillations predict
visual perception performance between and within subjects. NeuroImage 37: 1465–1473.
Hanslmayr, S., Gross, J., Klimesch, W., and Shapiro, K. L. (2011). The role of alpha oscillations in temporal attention. Brain
Research Reviews 67: 331–343.
Heinen, S. J. and Liu, M. (1997). Single-neuron activity in the dorsomedial frontal cortex during smooth-pursuit eye movements
to predictable target motion. Visual Neuroscience 14: 853–865.
Henry, M. J. and Obleser, J. (2012). Frequency modulation entrains slow neural oscillations and optimizes human listening
behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109: 20095–20100.
Herrmann, C. S. (2001). Human EEG responses to 1–100 Hz flicker: Resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential
correlation to cognitive phenomena. Experimental Brain Research 137: 346–353.
Hoch, L., Tyler, M. D., and Tillmann, B. (2013). Regularity of unit length boosts statistical learning in verbal and nonverbal
artificial languages. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 20: 142–147.
Hollerman, J. R. and Schultz, W. (1998). Dopamine neurons report an error in the temporal prediction of reward during learning.
Nature Neuroscience 1: 304–309.
Ivry, R. B. and Spencer, R. M. (2004). The neural representation of time. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 14: 225–32.
Janssen, P. and Shadlen, M. (2005). A representation of the hazard rate of elapsed time in macaque area LIP. Nature Neuroscience
8: 234–241.
Jaramillo, S. and Zador, A. M. (2011). The auditory cortex mediates the perceptual e ects of acoustic temporal expectation.
Jensen, O., Bonnefond, M., and Vanrullen, R. (2012). An oscillatory mechanism for prioritizing salient unattended stimuli. Trends
in Cognitive Sciences 16: 200–206.
Jepma, M., Wagenmakers, E. J., and Nieuwenhuis, S. (2012). Temporal expectation and information processing: A model-based
analysis. Cognition 122: 426–441.
Jin, D. Z., Fujii, N., and Graybiel, A. M. (2009). Neural representation of time in cortico-basal ganglia circuits. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences USA 106: 19156–19161.
Johnston, A., Arnold, D. H., and Nishida, S. (2006). Spatially localized distortions of event time. Current Biology 16: 472–479.
Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Review
p. 714 83: 323–355.
Jones, M. R. (2010). Attending to sound patterns and the role of entrainment. In A. C. Nobre and J. T. Coull (eds.), Attention and
Time (pp. 317–330). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jones, M. R. and Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review 96: 459–491.
Jones, M. R., Johnston, H. M., and Puente, J. (2006). E ects of auditory pattern structure on anticipatory and reactive attending.
Cognitive Psychology 53: 59–96.
Jones, M. R., Moynihan, H., Mackenzie, N., and Puente, J. (2002). Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic
arrays. Psychological Science 13: 313–319.
Karlin, L. (1959). Reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration and variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58: 185–
191.
Karmarkar, U. R. and Buonomano, D. (2007). Timing in the absence of clocks: Encoding time in neural network states. Neuron 53:
427–438.
Kelly, S. P., Gomez-Ramirez, M., and Foxe, J. J. (2009). The strength of anticipatory spatial biasing predicts target discrimination
at attended locations: A high-density EEG study. European Journal of Neuroscience 30: 2224–2234.
Kelly, S. P., Lalor, E. C., Reilly, R. B., and Foxe, J. J. (2006). Increases in alpha oscillatory power reflect an active retinotopic
mechanism for distractor suppression during sustained visuospatial attention. Journal of Neurophysiology 95: 3844–3851.
Kiefer, M. and Brendel, D. (2006). Attentional modulation of unconscious ʻautomaticʼ processes: Evidence from event-related
potentials in a masked priming paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18: 184–198.
King, A. J. and Nelken, I. (2009). Unraveling the principles of auditory cortical processing: Can we learn from the visual system?
Kingstone, A. and Klein, R. M. (1993). What are human express saccades? Perception & Psychophysics 54: 260–273.
Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P., and Hanslmayr, S. (2007). EEG alpha oscillations: The inhibition-timing hypothesis. Brain Research
Reviews 53: 63–88.
Kotz, S. A., Schwartze, M., and Schmidt-Kassow, M. (2009). Non-motor basal ganglia functions: A review and proposal for a model
of sensory predictability in auditory language perception. Cortex 45: 982–990.
Krams, M., Rushworth, M. F., Deiber, M. P., Frackowiak, R. S., and Passingham, R. E. (1998). The preparation, execution and
suppression of copied movements in the human brain. Experimental Brain Research 120: 386–398.
Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A., Ulbert, I., and Schroeder, C. (2008). Entrainment of neuronal oscillations as a mechanism of
attentional selection. Science 320: 110–113.
Lakatos, P., Musacchia, G., OʼConnell, M. N., Falchier, A. Y., Javitt, D. C., and Schroeder, C. E. (2013). The spectrotemporal filter
mechanism of auditory selective attention. Neuron 77: 750–761.
Lakatos, P., OʼConnell, M. N., Barczak, A., Mills, A., Javitt, D. C., and Schroeder, C. E. (2009). The leading sense: Supramodal
control of neurophysiological context by attention. Neuron 64: 419–430.
Lakatos, P., Shah, A. S., Knuth, K. H., Ulbert, I., Karmos, G., and Schroeder, C. E. (2005). An oscillatory hierarchy controlling
neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 94: 1904–1911.

Lampar, A. and Lange, K. (2011). E ects of temporal trial-by-trial cuing on early and late stages of auditory processing: Evidence
p. 715 from event-related potentials. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 73: 1916–1933.
Lange, K. (2009). Brain correlates of early auditory processing are attenuated by expectations for time and pitch. Brain and
Cognition 69: 127–137.
Lange, K. (2010). Can a regular context induce temporal orienting to a target sound? International Journal of Psychophysiology:
O icial Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology 78: 231–238.
Lange, K., Kramer, U. M., and Röder, B. (2006). Attending points in time and space. Experimental Brain Research 173: 130–140.
Lange, K. and Röder, B. (2006). Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across
modalities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18: 715–729.
Lange, K. and Röder, B. (2010). Temporal orienting in audition, touch, and across modalities. In A. C. Nobre and J. Coull (eds.),
Attention and Time (pp. 393–406). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lange, K., Rosler, F., and Röder, B. (2003). Early processing stages are modulated when auditory stimuli are presented at an
attended moment in time: An event-related potential study. Psychophysiology 40: 806–817.
Large, E. W., Fink, P., and Kelso, J. A. (2002). Tracking simple and complex sequences. Psychological Research 66: 3–17.
Large, E. W., and Snyder, J. S. (2009). Pulse and meter as neural resonance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1169: 46–
57.
Lasley, D. J. and Cohn, T. (1981). Detection of a luminance increment: E ect of temporal uncertainty. Journal of the Optical
Society of America 71: 845–850.
Leon, M. I. and Shadlen, M. (2003). Representation of time by neurons in the posterior parietal cortex of the macaque. Neuron 38:
317–327.
Liang, H., Bressler, S. L., Bu alo, E. A., Desimone, R., and Fries, P. (2005). Empirical mode decomposition of field potentials from
macaque V4 in visual spatial attention. Biological Cybernetics 92: 380–392.
Liberman, A. M. and Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21: 1–36.
Lima, B., Singer, W., and Neuenschwander, S. (2011). Gamma responses correlate with temporal expectation in monkey primary
visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 31: 15919–15931.
Los, S. A. and Agter, F. (2005). Reweighting sequential e ects across di erent distributions of foreperiods: Segregating
elementary contributions to nonspecific preparation. Perception & Psychophysics 67: 1161–1170.
Los, S. A. and Heslenfeld, D. J. (2005). Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation:
Electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134: 52–72.
Lowe, G. 1967. Interval of time uncertainty in visual detection. Perception & Psychophysics 2: 278–280.

Lucchetti, C. and Bon, L. (2001). Time-modulated neuronal activity in the premotor cortex of macaque monkeys. Experimental
Brain Research 141: 254–260.
Luce, R. (1986). Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Macar, F., Anton, J. L., Bonnet, M., and Vidal, F. (2004). Timing functions of the supplementary motor area: An event-related fMRI
study. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research 21: 206–215.
p. 716 Mackay, A. and Juola, J. F. (2007). Are spatial and temporal attention independent? Perception & Psychophysics 69: 972–979.
Mangun, G. R. and Hillyard, S. (1987). The spatial allocation of visual attention as indexed by event-related brain potentials.
Human Factors: Cognitive Psychophysiology 29: 195–211.
Marois, R. and Ivano , J. (2005). Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9: 296–305.
Martens, S. and Johnson, A. (2005). Timing attention: Cuing target onset interval attenuates the attentional blink. Memory &
Cognition 33: 234–240.
Mathewson, K. E., Fabiani, M., Gratton, G., Beck, D. M., and Lleras, A. (2010). Rescuing stimuli from invisibility: Inducing a
momentary release from visual masking with pre-target entrainment. Cognition 115: 186–191.
Mathewson, K. E., Gratton, G., Fabiani, M., Beck, D. M., and Ro, T. (2009). To see or not to see: Prestimulus alpha phase predicts
visual awareness. Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 29: 2725–2732.
Mathewson, K. E., Prudhomme, C., Fabiani, M., Beck, D. M., Lleras, A., and Gratton, G. (2012). Making waves in the stream of
consciousness: Entraining oscillations in EEG alpha and fluctuations in visual awareness with rhythmic visual stimulation.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24: 2321–2333.
Mauk, M. and Buonomano, D. (2004). The neural basis of temporal processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27: 307–340.
Miall, C. (1989). The storage of time intervals using oscillating neurons. Neural Computation 1: 359–371.
Milliken, B., Lupiáñez, J., Roberts, M., and Stevanovski, B. (2003). Orienting in space and time: Joint contributions to exogenous
spatial cuing e ects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10: 877–883.
Miniussi, C., Wilding, E. L., Coull, J. T., and Nobre, A. C. (1999). Orienting attention in time: Modulation of brain potentials. Brain
122: 1507–1518.
Morrone, M., Ross, J., and Burr, D. (2005). Saccadic eye movements cause compression of time as well as space. Nature
Müller-Gethmann, H., Ulrich, R., and Rinkenauer, G. (2003). Locus of the e ect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the
lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology 40: 597–611.
Naccache, L., Blandin, E., and Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological
Science 13: 416–424.

Newhall, S. N. (1923). E ects of attention on the intensity of cutaneous pressure and on visual brightness. Archives of Psychology
61: 5–75.
Nickerson, R. S. (1965). Response time to the second of two successive signals as a function of absolute and relative duration of
intersignal interval. Perceptual & Motor Skills 21: 3–10.
Niemi, P. and Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiods and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin 89: 133–162.
Niki, H. and Watanabe, M. (1979). Prefrontal and cingulate unit activity during timing behavior in the monkey. Brain Research
171: 213–224.
Nobre, A. C. (2001). Orienting attention to instants in time. Neuropsychologia 39: 1317–1328.

Nobre, A. C. (2010). How can temporal expectations bias perception and action? In A. C. Nobre and J. Coull (eds.), Attention and
Time (pp. 371–392). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nobre, A., Correa, A., and Coull, J. (2007). The hazards of time. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 17: 465–470.
Nobre, A. C. and Coull, J. T. (eds.) (2010). Attention and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nobre, A. C. and OʼReilly, J. (2004). Time is of the essence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 387–389.
Nobre, A. C., Rohenkohl, G., and Stokes, M. (2012). Nervous anticipation: Top-down biasing across space and time. In M. I. Posner
p. 717 (ed.), Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention, 2nd edn. (pp. 159–186). New York: Guilford Press.
Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., Missal, M., and Mouraux, A. (2011). Tagging the neuronal entrainment to beat and meter. Journal of
Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 31: 10234–10240.
OʼConnell, R. G., Dockree, P. M., Robertson, I. H., Bellgrove, M. A., Foxe, J. J., and Kelly, S. P. (2009). Uncovering the neural
signature of lapsing attention: Electrophysiological signals predict errors up to 20 s before they occur. Journal of Neuroscience:
The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 29: 8604–8611.
OʼReilly, J. X., McCarthy, K. J., Capizzi, M., and Nobre, A. C. (2008a). Acquisition of the temporal and ordinal structure of
movement sequences in incidental learning. Journal of Neurophysiology 99: 2731–2735.
OʼReilly, J. X., Mesulam, M., and Nobre, A. (2008b). The cerebellum predicts the timing of perceptual events. Journal of
Olson, I. and Chun, M. (2001). Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition 27: 1299–1313.
Palmer, J., Huk, A. C., and Shadlen, M. N. (2005). The e ect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual
decision. Journal of Vision 5: 376–404.
Palva, S. and Palva, J. M. (2007). New vistas for alpha-frequency band oscillations. Trends in Neurosciences 30: 150–158.

Petersen, S. E. and Posner, M. I. (2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years a er. Annual Review of Neuroscience
35: 73–89.
Pfeuty, M., Ragot, R., and Pouthas, V. (2005). Relationship between CNV and timing of an upcoming event. Neuroscience Letters
382: 106–111.
Pfurtscheller, G. and Lopes Da Silva, F. H. (1999). Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic
principles. Clinical Neurophysiology 110: 1842–1857.
Pfurtscheller, G., Neuper, C., and Mohl, W. (1994). Event-related desynchronization (ERD) during visual processing. International
Journal of Psychophysiology: O icial Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology 16: 147–153.
Pfurtscheller, G., Stancak, A., Jr, and Neuper, C. (1996). Event-related synchronization (ERS) in the alpha band: An
electrophysiological correlate of cortical idling—a review. International Journal of Psychophysiology: O icial Journal of the
International Organization of Psychophysiology 24: 39–46.
Poeppel, D. (2003). The analysis of speech in di erent temporal integration windows: Cerebral lateralization as ʻasymmetric
sampling in timeʼ. Speech Communication 41: 245–255.
Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric Explorations of Mind. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32: 3–25.
Posner, M. I. and Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review 78: 391–408.
Posner, M. I. and Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 13: 25–42.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., and Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology
109: 160–174.
Power, A. J., Mead, N., Barnes, L., and Goswami, U. (2012). Neural entrainment to rhythmically presented auditory, visual, and
audio-visual speech in children. Frontiers in Psychology 3: 216.
Praamstra, P., Kourtis, D., Kwok, H. F., and Oostenveld, R. (2006). Neurophysiology of implicit timing in serial choice reaction-
p. 718 time performance. Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 26: 5448–5455.
Premereur, E., Vandu el, W., and Janssen, P. (2012). Local field potential activity associated with temporal expectations in the
macaque lateral intraparietal area. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24: 1314–1330.
Ratcli , R. and Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science 9: 347–356.
Ray, W. J. and Cole, H. W. (1985). EEG alpha activity reflects attentional demands, and beta activity reflects emotional and
cognitive processes. Science 228: 750–752.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., and Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An
attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18: 849–860.

Renoult, L., Roux, S., and Riehle, A. (2006). Time is a rubberband: Neuronal activity in monkey motor cortex in relation to time
estimation. European Journal of Neuroscience 23: 3098–3108.
Riehle, A., Grun, S., Diesmann, M., and Aertsen, A. (1997). Spike synchronization and rate modulation di erentially involved in
motor cortical function. Science 278: 1950–1953.
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., and Umiltà, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians:
Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia 25: 31–40.
Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., and Sheliga, B. M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umiltà and M. Moscovitch(eds.), Attention
and Performance XV (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Roesch, M. R. and Olson, C. R. (2005). Neuronal activity dependent on anticipated and elapsed delay in macaque prefrontal
cortex, frontal and supplementary eye fields, and premotor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 94: 1469–1497.
Rohenkohl, G., Coull, J. T., and Nobre, A. C. (2011). Behavioural dissociation between exogenous and endogenous temporal
orienting of attention. PLoS One 6: e14620.
Rohenkohl, G., Cravo, A. M., Wyart, V., and Nobre, A. C. (2012a). Temporal expectation improves the quality of sensory
information. Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 32: 8424–8428.
Rohenkohl, G., Cravo, A. M., Wyart, V., and Nobre, A. C. (2012b). Re: Temporal expectation may a ect the onset, not the rate, of
evidence accumulation. Reply to Nieuwenhuis, S., Jepma, M., and Wagenmakers, E.-J. Temporal expectation may a ect the
onset, not the rate, of evidence accumulation. Journal of Neuroscience 32: 8424–8428.
Rohenkohl, G. and Nobre, A. C. (2011). Alpha oscillations related to anticipatory attention follow temporal expectations. Journal
of Neuroscience 31: 14076–14084.
Rolke, B. and Hofmann, P. (2007). Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14: 522–
526.
Rolke, B. and Ulrich, R. (2010). On the locus of temporal preparation: Enhancement of premotor processes? In A. C. Nobre and
J. T. Coull (eds.), Attention and Time (pp. 227–242). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Romei, V., Gross, J., and Thut, G. (2010). On the role of prestimulus alpha rhythms over occipito-parietal areas in visual input
regulation: Correlation or causation? Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 30: 8692–8697.
Rovelli, C. (2007). Quantum Gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rushworth, M. F., Nixon, P. D., Renowden, S., Wade, D. T., and Passingham, R. E. (1997). The le parietal cortex and motor
attention. Neuropsychologia 35: 1261–1273.
Sanabria, D., Capizzi, M., and Correa, A. (2011). Rhythms that speed you up. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
p. 719 Perception and Performance 37: 236–244.
Sanders, L. and Astheimer, L. (2008). Temporally selective attention modulates early perceptual processing: Event-related
potential evidence. Perception & Psychophysics 70: 732–742.

Schmidt-Kassow, M. and Kotz, S. A. (2009). Event-related brain potentials suggest a late interaction of meter and syntax in the
P600. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21: 1693–1708.
Scho elen, J. M., Oostenveld, R., and Fries, P. (2005). Neuronal coherence as a mechanism of e ective corticospinal interaction.
Science 308: 111–113.
Schroeder, C. E. and Lakatos, P. (2009a). The gamma oscillation: Master or slave? Brain Topography 22: 24–26.
Schroeder, C. E. and Lakatos, P. (2009b). Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends in
Neurosciences 32: 9–18.
Schroeder, C. E., Wilson, D. A., Radman, T., Scharfman, H., and Lakatos, P. (2010). Dynamics of active sensing and perceptual
selection. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 20: 172–176.
Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Prediction of external events with our motor system: Towards a new framework. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences 11: 211–218.
Schubotz, R. I. and Von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). Functional organization of the lateral premotor cortex: fMRI reveals di erent regions
activated by anticipation of object properties, location and speed. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research 11: 97–112.
Schwartz, G. and Berry, M. J., 2nd (2008). Sophisticated temporal pattern recognition in retinal ganglion cells. Journal of
Neurophysiology 99: 1787–1798.
Seibold, V. C., Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., and Ulrich, R. (2011). Does temporal preparation increase the rate of sensory
information accumulation? Acta Psychologica 137: 56–64.
Seifried, T., Ulrich, R., Bausenhart, K. M., Rolke, B., and Osman, A. (2010). Temporal preparation decreases perceptual latency:
Evidence from a clock paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63: 2432–2451.
Shen, D. and Alain, C. (2011). Temporal attention facilitates short-term consolidation during a rapid serial auditory presentation
task. Experimental Brain Research/Experimentelle Hirnforschung/Experimentation cérébrale 215: 285–292.
Shen, D. and Alain, C. (2012). Implicit temporal expectation attenuates auditory attentional blink. PLoS One 7: e36031.
Shuler, M. G. and Bear, M. F. (2006). Reward timing in the primary visual cortex. Science 311: 1606–1609.
Snodgrass, J. G. (1969). Foreperiod e ects in simple reaction time: Anticipation or expectancy? Journal of Experimental
Psychology 79: 1–19.
Snyder, A. C. and Foxe, J. J. (2010). Anticipatory attentional suppression of visual features indexed by oscillatory alpha-band
power increases: A high-density electrical mapping study. Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for
Snyder, J. S. and Large, E. W. (2005). Gamma-band activity reflects the metric structure of rhythmic tone sequences. Brain
Research: Cognitive Brain Research 24: 117–126.
Sumbre, G., Muto, A., Baier, H., and Poo, M. (2008). Entrained rhythmic activities of neuronal ensembles as perceptual memory of
time interval. Nature 456: 102–106.

Teichner, W. H. (1954). Recent studies of simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin 51: 128–149.
Theunissen, F. E. (2003). From synchrony to sparseness. Trends in Neurosciences 26: 61–64.

Theunissen, F. E., Sen, K., and Doupe, A. J. (2000). Spectral-temporal receptive fields of nonlinear auditory neurons obtained
p. 720 using natural sounds. Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 20: 2315–2331.
Thut, G., Nietzel, A., Brandt, S. A., and Pascual-Leone, A. (2006). Alpha-band electroencephalographic activity over occipital
cortex indexes visuospatial attention bias and predicts visual target detection. Journal of Neuroscience 26: 9494–9502.
Tillmann, B. (2012). Music and language perception: Expectations, structural integration, and cognitive sequencing. Topics in
Cognitive Science 4: 568–584.
Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indi erence interval: Implications for a model of the ʻinternal clockʼ.
Psychological Monographs 77: 1–31.
Trivino, M., Correa, A., Arnedo, M., and Lupiáñez, J. (2010). Temporal orienting deficit a er prefrontal damage. Brain 133: 1173–
1185.
Tsujimoto, S. and Sawaguchi, T. (2005). Neuronal activity representing temporal prediction of reward in the primate prefrontal
cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 93: 3687–3692.
Van Dijk, H., Scho elen, J. M., Oostenveld, R., and Jensen, O. (2008). Prestimulus oscillatory activity in the alpha band predicts
visual discrimination ability. Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 28: 1816–1823.
Van Ede, F., De Lange, F., Jensen, O., and Maris, E. (2011). Orienting attention to an upcoming tactile event involves a spatially
and temporally specific modulation of sensorimotor alpha- and beta-band oscillations. Journal of Neuroscience 31: 2016–2024.
Vangkilde, S., Coull, J. T., and Bundesen, C. (2012). Great expectations: Temporal expectation modulates perceptual processing
speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38: 1183–1191.
Viemeister, N. F. and Plack, C. J. (1993). Time analysis. In W. Yost, A. Popper, and R. Fay (eds.), Human Psychophysics (pp. 116–
154). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Walter, W. G., Cooper, R., Aldridge, V. J., McCallum, W. C., and Winter, A. L. (1964). Contingent negative variation: An electric sign
of sensorimotor association and expectancy in the human brain. Nature 203: 380–384.
Westheimer, G. and Ley, E. (1996). Temporal uncertainty e ects on orientation discrimination and stereoscopic thresholds.
Journal of the Optical Society of America 13: 884–886.
White, R. C., Aimola Davies, A. M., Halleen, T. J., and Davies, M. (2010). Tactile expectations and the perception of self-touch: An
investigation using the rubber hand paradigm. Consciousness and Cognition 19: 505–519.
Will, U. and Berg, E. (2007). Brain wave synchronization and entrainment to periodic acoustic stimuli. Neuroscience Letters 424:
55–60.

Williams, P. E., Mechler, F., Gordon, J., Shapley, R., and Hawken, M. J. (2004). Entrainment to video displays in primary visual
cortex of macaque and humans. Journal of Neuroscience 24: 8278–8288.
Woldor , M., Hansen, J. C., and Hillyard, S. A. (1987). Evidence for e ects of selective attention in the mid-latency range of the
human auditory event-related potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Supplement 40: 146–154.
Woodrow, H. (1914). The Measurement of Attention. Whitefish, Mont.: Kessinger.

Worden, M. S., Foxe, J. J., Wang, N., and Simpson, G. V. (2000). Anticipatory biasing of visuospatial attention indexed by
retinotopically specific alpha-band electroencephalography increases over occipital cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 20: RC63.
Wundt, W. (1874/1904). Principles of Physiological Psychology. London: Swan Sonnenschein.

Wyart, V. and Tallon-Baudry, C. (2008). Neural dissociation between visual awareness and spatial attention. Journal of
p. 721 Neuroscience 28: 2667–2679.
Yamagishi, N., Callan, D. E., Anderson, S. J., and Kawato, M. (2008). Attentional changes in pre-stimulus oscillatory activity within
early visual cortex are predictive of human visual performance. Brain Research 1197: 115–122.
Yang, T. and Shadlen, M. N. (2007). Probabilistic reasoning by neurons. Nature 447: 1075–1080.
Zanto, T. P., Pan, P., Liu, H., Bollinger, J., Nobre, A. C., and Gazzaley, A. (2011). Age-related changes in orienting attention in time.
Journal of Neuroscience: The O icial Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 31: 12461–12470.
Zhou, H. and Desimone, R. (2011). Feature-based attention in the frontal eye field and area V4 during visual search. Neuron 70:
1205–1217.
Zion Golumbic, E. M., Ding, N., Bickel, S., Lakatos, P., Schevon, C. A., McKhann, G. M., Goodman, R. R., Emerson, R., Mehta, A. D.,
Simon, J. Z., Poeppel, D., and Schroeder, C. E. (2013). Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a
ʻcocktail partyʼ. Neuron 77: 980–991.

24 Time For The Fourth Dimension in Attention: Anna C. (Kia) Nobre Gustavo Rohenkohl

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

24 Time For The Fourth Dimension in Attention: Anna C. (Kia) Nobre Gustavo Rohenkohl

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

24 Time For The Fourth Dimension in Attention: Anna C. (Kia) Nobre Gustavo Rohenkohl

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Oxford Handbook of Attention

Anna C. (Kia) Nobre (ed.), Sabine Kastner (ed.)

24 Time for the Fourth Dimension in Attention 

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Working Hypotheses and Open Questions

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Sophisticated psychophysical experiments combined with computational modelling are beginning to be

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Sensorimotor and motor areas

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Working Hypotheses and Open Questions

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Working Hypotheses and Open Questions

Types of temporal biases

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Interactions between temporal and other biases

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review 97: 523–547.

Buzsáki, G. (2006). Rhythms of the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Nobre, A. C. (2001). Orienting attention to instants in time. Neuropsychologia 39: 1317–1328.

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Rovelli, C. (2007). Quantum Gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Theunissen, F. E. (2003). From synchrony to sparseness. Trends in Neurosciences 26: 61–64.

Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41256/chapter/350825068 by McGill University Libraries user on 27 October 2022

Woodrow, H. (1914). The Measurement of Attention. Whitefish, Mont.: Kessinger.

Wundt, W. (1874/1904). Principles of Physiological Psychology. London: Swan Sonnenschein.

You might also like