11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

Subscribe Premium LOGIN

TOP STORIES NEWS UPDATES COLUMNS INTERVIEWS ENVIRONMENT RTI

KNOW THE LAW VIDEOS SPONSORED ROUND UPS PODCAST LAW EXAMS

JOB UPDATES BOOK REVIEWS EVENTS CORNER LAW FIRMS SC JUDGMENTS लाइव लॉ हिंदी LAW SCHOOLS IBC TAX A

 Search... 

Home / Know the Law / Explained | UAPA...

KNOW THE LAW

Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction,

Process and Interpretations
Sofi Ahsan 16 Oct 2022 7:12 AM

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 1/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court Friday ordered release of former

Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba and five others in a UAPA case that

accused them of being members and sympathisers of the banned CPI

(Maoist). A day later, the judgement was suspended by the Supreme Court.

The high court in its decision on the appeals against the conviction held the

trial to be "null and void" after ruling that the same took place in the absence

of valid sanction under Section 45(1) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention)

Act.

Also Read - When Can A Citizen's Right To Travel Abroad Be Restricted?

Explained With Judgments

The Maharashtra government within hours of the pronouncement challenged

the judgement before the Supreme Court. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta,

appearing for the State, on Saturday argued that the question regarding

sanction was not raised before the trial court.

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 2/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

After the hearing, the apex court in the interim order suspended the High

Court ruling, saying that the Nagpur Bench has not decided the case on

merits.

Also Read - Explained| Kerala Human Sacrifice : Which States Have Laws

Against Superstitions & Black Magic?

"The offences for which the accused were convicted by the learned trial

Court are very serious and if ultimately they are tested by the High Court on

merits and on merits the State succeeds and the judgment and order passed

by the learned trial Court is upheld, the offences are very serious against the

sovereignty and integrity of the country," said the court.

As a result, all the convicts will continue to remain in jail. A prayer for keeping

Professor Saibaba under house arrest instead of continuing with his

incarceration was sternly opposed by the State with Mehta even arguing that

such requests were repeatedly coming from "Urban Naxals". The court also

was not inclined to allow the prayer at this stage.

Also Read - Explained | Nayanthara-Vignesh Shivan Controversy: What

Does Surrogacy (Regulation) Act Say?

Live Law looks at the UAPA provisions, the 2008 UAPA Rules and various

judicial interpretations of the sanction process

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 3/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

Section 45 (1) UAPA Act and 2008 Rules

The anti-terror law, which is often described as draconian for its provisions

that make it almost impossible for an accused to secure bail, has been

divided into seven chapters. The law was enacted for "more effective

prevention of certain unlawful activities of individuals and associations" and

"for dealing with terrorist activities".

Also Read - Delayed Institution Of Police Report Does Not Threaten

Assumption Of Cognizance U/S 468 CrPC: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Section 45 of the Act deals with cognizance of the offences mentioned under

the law, by a court of competent jurisdiction.

It states that no court can take cognizance of any offence under Chapter III -

this section relates to unlawful activities and membership of unlawful

associations and their funding, without the previous sanction of central

government or the officer authorised by it.

The provision also deals with the cognizance of offences under Chapter IV

and VI - these sections relate to terrorists, their activities and the terror

organisations.

As in case of Chapter III, Section 45 states that no court can take cognizance

of the offences mentioned under Chapter IV and VI without the previous

sanction of the central government or state government, depending upon the

case. Where the offence has been committed against a foreign government,

the sanction of the central government is necessary.

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 4/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

Under The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) (Recommendation and Sanction

of Prosecution) Rules, 2008, the Competent Authority, after receiving the

report containing evidence gathered by the investigating officer, is required to

make a recommendation to the government within seven days. Thereafter,

the government is also required to take a decision regarding sanction of

prosecution within seven days after receipt of the recommendations from the

authority.

The competent authority under the law is required to make "an independent

review" of the evidence gathered by the investigating officer and only then

make his recommendation for or against sanction to the government.

Courts on Sanction Process

The division bench of Justices Rohit Deo and Anil Pansare, in the judgement

discharging Professor Saibaba and others, asserted that sanction "serves the

salutary object of providing safeguard to the accused from unwarranted

prosecution and the agony and trauma of trial". Terming Section 45 of UAPA

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 5/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

a legislatively-provided additional safeguard, the court said recommendatory

report is not binding on the sanctioning authority.

However, the court held that the words 'shall' in the 2008 rules is intended

only to convey a sense of urgency to the authorities but is not mandatory.

The bench clarified that it was not suggesting that the time frame can be

violated with impunity. It noted that while any infraction in complying with the

deadline does not vitiate the sanction, an accused will have to demonstrate

some prejudice or "causation of failure of justice" due to the "failure to

adhere to the time frame statutorily prescribed".

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 6/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

However, it set aside the entire trial against Professor Saibaba on the ground

that Sessions Judge took cognizance of the offences against him, framed

the charges and examined the first prosecution witness, in absence of the

sanction - which came much later. "The statutory bar is not lifted, and

therefore, the cognizance and the subsequent proceedings cannot be clothed

with the sanctity of finding, sentence or order rendered by a Court of

competent jurisdiction," it held.

Kerala High Court too has earlier dealt with similar questions in a case

against a member of CPI (Maoist). The division bench of Justice K.Vinod

Chandran and Justice C. Jayachandran in the decision dated March 17 said

the provision for sanction is mandatory and sacrosanct.

"We find the sanction order of the UA(P)A to be not brought out in time, as

statutorily mandated and bereft of any application of mind; both vitiating the

cognizance taken by the Special Court," said the court, while setting aside the

cognisance taken by the sessions court against the accused.

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 7/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

The Nagpur Bench in its Friday's decision, after perusal of Kerala High Court's

judgment, said it is not inclined to hold that the time limit prescribed for

making the recommendation or according sanction is mandatory. Last

month, the Supreme Court permitted the Kerala government to withdraw its

appeal against the March 17 decision after it submitted that the High Court's

strict interpretation appears to be correct.

However, the bench headed by Justice M.R. Shah then kept the question of

law open. It was the bench of Justice Shah and Justice Bela Trivedi which

heard the matter on Saturday.

In 2019, the Kerala High Court had ruled that "the sanctioning authority as

well as the State are expected to scrupulously stick to the time frame,

particularly in view of the very stringent provisions of the Act". Justice Raja

Vijayaraghavan in the ruling said that when conditions for grant of bail under

UAPA and penalties are stringent, the sanction process "must have to be

adopted very seriously and exhaustively than the sanction contemplated in

other penal statutes".

Maharastra government on Saturday cited a 1998 judgement of Gujarat High

Court on Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, which has since

been repealed, to contend that the question regarding process of sanction

cannot be raised at the stage of appeal. SG Tushar Mehta also referred to

Section 465 CrPC to state that irregularities in sanction for prosecution will

not vitiate trial.

The Supreme Court in State of M.P vs Virendra Kumar Tripathi - wherein the

allegation was that sanction under the Prevention of Corruption Act was not

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 8/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

accorded in accordance with law and Special Judge on this ground had

discharged the accused, in 2009 said:

Section 19(3) of the PC Act makes it clear that "no finding, sentence or or

order passed by a Special Judge shall be reversed or altered by a Court of

appeal on the ground of absence of/or an error, omission or irregularity in

sanction required under sub-section(1) of Section 19 of the PC Act unless in

the opinion of the Court, a failure of justice has in fact been occasioned".

On Saturday, the Solicitor General said that Section 43C of UAPA makes CrPC

applicable to the Act, while arguing in context of Section 465 CrPC - a

provision which is almost similarly worded as Section 19(C) of the PC Act.

Section 43C of UAPA states: "​​The provisions of the Code shall apply, insofar

as they are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act, to all arrests,

searches and seizures made under this Act."

The Nagpur Bench in the judgement delivered on Friday said an egregious

defect in sanction or absence of sanction "cannot be equated with error,

omission or irregularity in sanction". It was responding to an argument that

Section 465 specifically refers to error or irregularity in any sanction for

prosecution, and provides that failure of justice will have to be "demonstrated

as sine qua non for reversing finding or sentence rendered by a Court of

competent jurisdiction."

In another judgement related to the prosecution sanction under PC Act and

its interplay with Section 465 CrPC, the Supreme Court, while setting aside

the orders of Patna High Court in 2014 said that in a situation where under

both the enactments any error, omission or irregularity in the sanction, which

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 9/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

would also include the competence of the authority to grant sanction, does

not vitiate the eventual conclusion in the trial including the conviction and

sentence, unless of course a failure of justice has occurred, it is difficult to

see how at the intermediary stage a criminal prosecution can be nullified or

interdicted on account of any such error, omission or irregularity.

In the operative part, it said:

"In the instant cases the High Court had interdicted the criminal proceedings

on the ground that the Law Department was not the competent authority to
accord sanction for the prosecution of the respondents. Even assuming that

the Law Department was not competent, it was still necessary for the High

Court to reach the conclusion that a failure of justice has been occasioned.

Such a finding is conspicuously absent rendering it difficult to sustain the

impugned orders of the High Court."

In Nanjappa v. State of Karnataka (2015), the Supreme Court, in a case under

the Prevention of Corruption Act, held that a trial with invalid Sanction is null

and void. In this judgment, the Court observed that the question, regarding

validity of a sanction for taking cognizance of the complaint against a public

servant, can be raised at any stage of the proceedings.

"If the trial Court proceeds, despite the invalidity attached to the sanction

order, the same shall be deemed to be non-est in the eyes of law and shall

not forbid a second trial for the same offences, upon grant of a valid sanction

for such prosecution," the Court observed.

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 10/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

TAGS UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT UAPA SECTION 45 OF UAPA ACT

PROSECUTION SANCTION KERALA HIGH COURT BOMBAY HIGH COURT

SANCTIONING AUTHORITY CENTRAL GOVERNMENT SUPREME COURT

SECTION 465 CRPC

Subscribe to LiveLaw, enjoy Ad free version and other unlimited features,

just INR 899 Click here to Subscribe. All payment options available.

loading....

SIMILAR + VIEW MORE

POSTS

When Can A Citizen's Explained| Kerala Human Explained | Nayanthara-

Right To Travel Abroad Sacrifice : Which States Vignesh Shivan
Be Restricted? Have Laws Against Controversy: What Does
https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 11/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

Explained With Superstitions & Black Surrogacy (Regulation)

Judgments Magic? Act Say?
19 Oct 2022 2:55 PM 12 Oct 2022 6:45 PM 11 Oct 2022 4:16 PM

Foreign Direct
Delayed Institution Of Investment In
Police Report Does Not India: Law And S. 313 CrPC - All Adverse
Threaten Assumption Of Procedure
Evidences Should Be Put As
Cognizance U/S 468 Questions; Avoid Bundling
CrPC: Punjab & Haryana Circumstances Together With
High Court Only Single Opportunity To
Explain : Supreme Court
29 Aug 2022
1 Sept 2022 8:27 AM 8:42 AM 4 Aug 2022 4:53 PM

Different Courts Difference Between "Per Can Retweeting, Sharing

Different Orders On Use Incurium" & "Sub Or Forwarding Offensive
Of Nets In "Mosquito Silentio" -Explainer Posts Attract Criminal
Prone" Taloja Prison Liability? Explainer
9 July 2022 12:47 PM 6 July 2022 10:10 AM 3 July 2022 8:21 AM

What Is A "Floor Test"? Roe v. Wade Overruled : Explainer : How The

Explained With What Does Indian Law President Of India Is

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 12/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

Say On Abortion? Elected?

Important Supreme
Court Judgments
29 June 2022 7:46 AM 25 June 2022 10:44 AM 21 June 2022 5:07 PM

JUST ENTER YOUR EMAIL FOR THE

LIVELAW DAILY NEWS BRIEFING BY
EMAIL ALL THE DAY"S HEADLINES AND
HIGHLIGHTS FROM LIVELAW, DIRECT
TO YOU EVERY MORNING

NEWSLETTERS
DIRECTLY IN YOUR MAILBOX

Enter Your Email

Submit

LAW FIRMS + MORE

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 13/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

The Seat Or The Assets – Where Do You Enforce The Award?

+ MORE
LATEST NEWS

1 J&K&L High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against Kashmir Walla Editors

2 Union Law Minister Kiren Rijiju Criticises Lawyers' Protests; Says Not
Good To Question Every Collegium Decision Which Has Govt Support

3 Alleged Remarks Against UP CM | Allahabad HC Refuses To Quash FIR

Against Samajwadi Party Leader Anurag Bhadouria

4 Bombay HC Seeks State's Response On PIL Seeking Mandatory Charging

Infrastructure For Electric Vehicles in Housing Societies

5 Kerala HC Deprecates Invocation Of Writ Jurisdiction Alleging 'Breach Of

Duty' By Police To Register Complaint When The Dispute Is Civil In Nature

FIR Registered In 1990 ; Trial Not Complete Even After Three Decades : SC
https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 14/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

Directs Kolkata Court To Complete Trial Within 6 Months

6

7 Madras High Court Restrains Over 12K Websites From Illegally

Broadcasting FIFA World Cup 2022

8 Former CJI U U Lalit To Join NUJS Kolkata As Visting Professor

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 15/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

लाइव लॉ हिंदी + MORE

पूर्व मुख्य न्यायाधीश यू यू ललित NUJS कोलकाता के विजिटिंग प्रोफे सर के तौर पर ज्वाइन करें गे

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 16/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

' निजी मेडिकल कॉलेजों का छात्रों से बॉन्ड मांगना परे शान करने वाला' : सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने छात्र को
पांच लाख रुपये लौटाने के निर्देश की पुष्टि की

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने गौतम नवलखा की हाउस अरे स्ट की अनुमति देने वाले आदेश को वापस लेने से
इनकार किया, NIA को 24 घंटे में इसे निष्पादित करने का निर्देश दिया

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 17/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

जस्टिस एमआर शाह की खंडपीठ के समक्ष छत्तीसगढ़ एनएएन घोटाला मामले की लिस्टिंग से
विवाद खड़ा हुआ

'इसमें कोर्ट का कोई दखल नहीं'- सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने दो बच्चों के मानदंड और देश भर में जनसंख्या
नियंत्रण नीति को लागू करने की मांग वाली याचिका पर सुनवाई से इनकार किया

+ MORE
INTERNATIONAL
https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 18/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

1 Banning Conditional Sentences For Certain Offences Is Constitutional:

Canada Supreme Court Holds In 5:4 Majority

2 Canada Supreme Court Says Mandatory And Lifetime Registration On Sex

Offender Registry Unconstitutional

3 Indian-American Attorney Arun Subramanian Nominated As US District

Judge In New York By President Joe Biden

4 Ketanji Brown Jackson Sworn In As US Supreme Court Justice- First Black

Woman In Court's History

+ MORE
ENVIRONMENT

1 Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against ₹64 Lakh Penalty On Municipal

Body For Dumping Solid Waste In Wular Lake

2 NGT Should Test Bonafides & Credentials Of Applicants Before Passing

Orders Having Far Reaching Effect: Supreme Court

3 'Lack Of Good Governance': NGT Slaps ₹35 Cr Penalty On J&K Admin For
Doodh Ganga Pollution

4 Grant Of Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Permissible In

Exceptional Circumstances : Surpeme Court

JOB UPDATES

1. Chief Manager (Administration) & Secretary Vacancy At Jawaharlal Nehru Port

Authority

2. Business Analyst Vacancy At Centre For Management Development, Kerala

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 19/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

3. Assistant General Manager (Law) Vacancy At NMDC Limited

4. Legal Associate Vacancy At Meharia And Company (MCO Legals) [Apply Now]

5. Legal Officer Vacancy At National Institute Of Rural Development And Panchayati

Raj

+ VIEW MORE

TOP STORIES KNOW THE LAW

NEWS UPDATE LAW FIRMS

COLUMNS JOB UPDATES

INTERVIEWS BOOK REVIEWS

INTERNATIONAL EVENTS CORNER

RTI UPDATES COVER STORY

EDITOR'S PICK PLACEMENTS

LAW SCHOOL CORNER SCHOLARSHIPS

ARTICLES SEMINARS

CALL FOR PAPERS ENVIRONMENT

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 20/21
11/19/22, 5:35 PM Explained | UAPA Prosecution Sanction, Process and Interpretations

COMPETITIONS BOOK REVIEWS

INTERNSHIPS

2022 © All Rights Reserved @LiveLaw

Powered By Hocalwire

Who We Are Careers Advertise With Us Contact Us Privacy Policy Terms And Conditions



X
Live Law subscriptions starting ₹ 899 +GST

Subscribe to Live Law now and get unlimited access.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Already have an account? Sign In

https://www.livelaw.in/know-the-law/uapa-sanction-process-and-interpretations-explained-211785 21/21