The document discusses job design and its relationship to job performance and employee well-being. It defines job design as how tasks and decision-making authority are allocated to employees. A model is presented that describes job design in terms of horizontal and vertical dimensions. Strategies for job design discussed include job rotation, enlargement, enrichment, and self-managed teams, which aim to optimize both organizational and individual needs. Key factors in effective job design include task variety, autonomy, and interpersonal relationships.
The document discusses job design and its relationship to job performance and employee well-being. It defines job design as how tasks and decision-making authority are allocated to employees. A model is presented that describes job design in terms of horizontal and vertical dimensions. Strategies for job design discussed include job rotation, enlargement, enrichment, and self-managed teams, which aim to optimize both organizational and individual needs. Key factors in effective job design include task variety, autonomy, and interpersonal relationships.
The document discusses job design and its relationship to job performance and employee well-being. It defines job design as how tasks and decision-making authority are allocated to employees. A model is presented that describes job design in terms of horizontal and vertical dimensions. Strategies for job design discussed include job rotation, enlargement, enrichment, and self-managed teams, which aim to optimize both organizational and individual needs. Key factors in effective job design include task variety, autonomy, and interpersonal relationships.
The document discusses job design and its relationship to job performance and employee well-being. It defines job design as how tasks and decision-making authority are allocated to employees. A model is presented that describes job design in terms of horizontal and vertical dimensions. Strategies for job design discussed include job rotation, enlargement, enrichment, and self-managed teams, which aim to optimize both organizational and individual needs. Key factors in effective job design include task variety, autonomy, and interpersonal relationships.
A General Model of Job Design This model describe the important determinants of job performance and organizational effectiveness. The designing jobs is a complex process. The way people do their jobs depends in part on how they perceive and think of their jobs. Individuals react differently to jobs. While one person may derive positive satisfaction from a job, another may not. It also recognizes the difficult trade-offs between organizational and individual needs. For example, the technology of manufacturing may dictate that management adopt assembly-line mass production methods and low-skilled jobs to achieve optimal efficiency. Such jobs, however, may result in boredom and worker discontent. Perhaps these costs could be avoided by carefully balancing organizational and individual needs. Job Design Job design refers to the actual ‗content and method of jobs‘ that employees perform in their jobs (Wall and Clegg, 1998, p. 337). Job design refers to the process by which managers decide what job tasks and how much authority each employee will have (Ivancevich et al., 2014, p. 141). Job design focuses directly on work-related tasks or activities that employees undertake to design, produce and deliver a good or service for the organization. Jobs can be sources of psychological stress and even mental and physical impairment. On a more positive note, jobs can provide income, meaningful life experiences, self-esteem, esteem from others, regulation of our lives, and association with others. The well-being of organizations and people relates to how well management designs jobs. In this topic, we need to clarify what job each individual should be doing and understand the causes of effective and ineffective job performance. Core Dimension of Job Design Job design decisions produce low or high levels of horizontal and vertical job-related tasks or activities.
• The horizontal axis represents the functional or
technical tasks that are required to produce a product or service. Job design choices can entail only one simple task or a series of tasks combined in one job (multiskilling and functional flexibility). • The vertical axis, on the other hand, represents the decision-making aspects of work activities, and shows the extent of employees‘ autonomy in the job. The extent to which the job allows employees to exercise choice and discretion in their work runs from low to high.
• The characteristics of job design A limit the content
or scope of the job, giving minimal, if any, discretion over how work-related tasks are performed. The focus is on a rapid completion of tasks and close supervision. • In contrast, job B is designed with more tasks and offers the employee more autonomy over how those tasks are performed. The focus is on improving job satisfaction by allowing the worker to complete several tasks with some self-supervision. Job Design and Quality of Work Life Quality of work life (QWL) is a management philosophy and practice that enhance employee dignity, introduce cultural change, and provide opportunities for growth and development. QWL programs are intended to increase employee trust, involvement, and problem solving so as to increase both worker satisfaction and organizational effectiveness. Indicators of quality of work life include accident rates, sick leave usage, employee turnover, stress, and number of grievances filed. The concept and application of QWL are broad and involve more than jobs, but the jobs that people do are important sources of satisfaction. Job design attempts : (1) to identify the most important needs of employees and the organization and (2) to remove obstacles in the workplace that impede those needs. Job Design: Range, Depth, and Relationships Job range refers to the number of tasks a jobholder performs. The individual who performs eight tasks to complete a job has a wider job range than a person performing four tasks. In most instances, the greater the number of tasks performed, the longer it takes to complete the job. Job depth , the amount of discretion an individual has to decide job activities and job outcomes. In many instances, job depth relates to personal influence as well as delegated authority. Job range and depth distinguish one job from another not only within the same organization, but also among different organizations. Lanjutan….Job relationship Job relationships are determined by managers‘ decisions regarding departmentalization bases and spans of control. The wider the span of control, the larger the group and consequently the more difficult it is to establish friendship and interest relationships. The basis for departmentalization that management selects also has important implications for job relationships. The functional basis places jobs with similar depth and range in the same groups, while product, territory, and customer bases place jobs with dissimilar depth and range in different groups. Thus, in functional departments, people will be doing much the same specialty. Thus, it‘s easier for them to establish social relationships that are satisfying with less stress, but also with less involvement in the department‘s activities. Job relationship also closely related to group performance which is affected in part by group cohesiveness which depends upon the quality and kind of interpersonal relationships of jobholders assigned to a task or command group. Individual Differences Individual differences ―provide filters such that different persons perceive the same objective stimuli in different manners. Employees with relatively weak higher-order needs are less concerned with performing a variety of tasks than are employees with relatively strong growth needs. At some point, performance turns down as these individuals reach the limits imposed by their abilities and time. The relationship between performance and task variety (even for individuals with high growth needs) is likely to be curvilinear.
Social Setting Differences
Differences in social settings of work also affect perceptions of job content. Examples of social setting differences include leadership style and what other people say about the job. Strategy to Increase Range in Jobs: Job Rotation and Job Enlargement 1. Job Rotation This practice involves rotating managers and non-managers alike from one job to another, or to one or more international postings. In so doing, the individual is expected to complete more job activities since each job includes different tasks (task variety). According to recent studies, increase employee satisfaction, reduce mental overload, decrease the number of errors due to fatigue, improve production and efficiency, and reduce on-the-job injuries. 2. Job Enlargement Job enlargement strategies focus upon the opposite of dividing work—they‘re a form of despecialization or increasing the number of tasks that an employee performs. For example, a job is designed such that the individual performs six tasks instead of three. Contemporary applications of job enlargement involve training individuals to perform several different jobs, each requiring considerable skill, whether in manufacturing or service organizations. If employees are amenable to job enlargement and have the requisite ability, then job enlargement should increase satisfaction and product quality and decrease absenteeism and turnover. Strategy to Increase Depth in Jobs: Job Enrichment Job enrichment means giving workers greater authority to participate in decisions, to set their own goals, and to evaluate their (and their work groups‘) performance. Job enrichment also involves changing the nature and style of managers‘ behavior. Given employees‘ ability to carry out enriched jobs can bring up positive outcomes lead to performance, that performance leads to intrinsic and extrinsic rewards, and that these rewards have power to satisfy needs. Yet job enrichment, when appropriate, necessarily involves job enlargement. The Job Characteristic Model (Hackman and Oldham) Self-Managed Teams Self-managed teams (SMTs) represent a job enrichment approach to redesign at the group level. An SMT is a relatively small group of individuals who are empowered to perform certain activities based on procedures established and decisions made within the group, with minimum or no outside direction. Typically, SMTs determine their own work assignments within the team and are responsible for an entire process from inception to completion. SMTs can take many forms, including task forces, project teams, quality circles, virtual teams, and new venture teams. SMTs require not only a new workflow and set of processes, but also new attitudes and behaviors. Two notable barriers to SMTs are resistance and misunderstanding. Team members may not like being responsible for goals that others on the team have not helped to achieve. Also, managers are often not clear about what employees should be doing under an SMT arrangement. Alternative Work Arrangements One aspect of job context relates to when the job is performed, or the work schedule. Alternative work arrangements is implemented by giving employees decision-making control over when they perform their work is an increasingly popular approach to job redesign (work flexibility). Alternative work arrangement give employee the flexibility to balance their work–life demands and as a way to reduce organizational costs and avoid layoffs that may lessen productivity and motivation. It has led to a variety of innovations : 1. The compressed workweek, employees are given an opportunity to work four 10-hour days rather than the more standard five 8- hour days. 2. The flextime, employees are given greater individual control over work scheduling, when they work at the office and when they work from home or a cafe. 3. Job sharing (shift-work), two or more individuals share one job. 4. Telecommuting, involves working at home while being linked to the office via a computer and/or fax machine. Virtual Teams It is a geographically distributed, functionally and/or culturally diverse group of individuals who rely on interactive technology such as e-mail, Webcasts, and videoconferencing to work together. The benefits include decrease product cycle times, increase customer responsiveness, and integrate more fully with suppliers, ability to offer employees more flexible work arrangements (e.g., telecommuting), provide 24-hour-a-day, seven-day-a-week customer service for geographically dispersed customers in different time zones, and decrease the amount of travel time and expenses that team members have to incur many. To successfully manage virtual teams, organizations may want to consider several factors : 1. The technology should fit the purpose of the collaboration, include a bulletin board or group e-mail is appropriate (receive the same information quickly), a Web conference with real-time white board and data sharing may be more suitable (training needs). 2. Virtual team members must be carefully selected who have the necessary skills, experience, work ethic, and interpersonal skills is critical to effective team functioning. 3. Trust between team members should be cultivated early in the process. Face-to-face meetings and/or teambuilding training exercises should be used during the initial periods of team formation to facilitate the development of trust. 4. Teams need to develop a sense of purpose and shared goals. 5. Leaders must be able to set a vision for the team and help resolve conflicts between members as well as assist members in overcoming obstacles. Total Quality Management Total quality management (TQM) refers to an organizational culture that is dedicated to continuous improvement and the production of high-quality products and services, ultimately resulting in higher levels of customer satisfaction. TQM combines technical knowledge and human knowledge. To deal with the inherent complexity and variability of production and service delivery technology, people must be empowered with authority to make necessary decisions and must be enabled with knowledge to know when to exercise that authority. Two common techniques used in the implementation of TQM include benchmarking and Six Sigma. Benchmarking is the process in which organizations monitor and adapt the best practices of their competitors in order to make continuous improvements. Six Sigma , is a quality standard and management process that specifies a goal of no defects so that a product or process has reached a high level of quality. Six Sigma can be used to analyze any product or service defects— errors on billing statements, poor customer service, or faulty brake systems on automobiles—that result in customer dissatisfaction. Job Performance Outcomes 1. Objective Outcomes Quantity and quality of output, absenteeism, tardiness, and turnover are objective outcomes that can be measured in quantitative terms. For each job, implicit or explicit standards exist for each of these objective outcomes. 2. Behavioral Outcomes The jobholder reacts to the work itself. She reacts by either engaging fully in the job or by ―going through the motions.‖ Moreover, physiological and health-related problems, work stress, physical and mental impairment, accidents and occupation-related disease can ensue as a consequence of job performance. 3. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Outcomes In a general sense, an intrinsic outcome is an object or event that follows from the worker‘s own efforts and doesn‘t require the involvement of any other person. Extrinsic outcomes, however, are objects or events that follow from the workers‘ own efforts in conjunction with other factors or persons not directly involved in the job itself. Pay, working conditions, co-workers, and even supervision are objects in the workplace that are potentially job outcomes, but that aren‘t a fundamental part of the work. Dealing with others and friendship interactions are sources of extrinsic outcomes. It‘s generally held that extrinsic rewards reinforce intrinsic rewards in a positive direction when the individual can attribute the source of the extrinsic reward to her own efforts. 4. Job Satisfaction Outcomes Job satisfaction depends on the levels of intrinsic and extrinsic outcomes and how the jobholder views those outcomes. These outcomes have different values for different people. Individual differences (include job involvement and commitment to the organization), the perceived equity of the organizational reward etc. play an important role to bring up employee‘s job satisfaction. Literatur
Bratton, John; Gold, Jeff. (2012). Human Resource
Management : Theory & Practice. Fifth Edition. Palgrave MacMillan. Ivancevich,J. M.; Konopaske,R.; Matteson, M.T. (2014). Organizational Behavior and Mangement. Tenth Edition. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Terima Kasih
Iles, P., Chuai, X. and Preece, D. (2010) 'Talent Management and HRM in Multinational Companies in Beijing: Definitions, Differences and Drivers', Journal of