Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Bahar Bayar Final Draft

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

ARTIFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS: WHAT AWAITS HUMANITY?

Robots’ and AI’s gaining consciousness has always been an unreachable possibility and

an enigmatic issue for humankind. However, with the developing technology, it is not an

impossible future anymore. Many scientists and researchers have different opinions on how this

will turn out. Some say it is one of the most remarkable feats of all time; others, on the other

hand, see sentient, non-living beings as just a vice. This essay is going to dwell on the potential

consequences of robots’ developing consciousness and explain that human beings are not ready

to live in harmony with sentient yet non-living beings.

       One of the consequences of robots’ developing consciousness is that robots will have the

power to destroy society to fulfil a given task. Meaning that AI can be programmed with a goal of

benefiting humanity, but it may eventually develop a destructive method for doing so. This may

occur whenever we fall flat to completely adjust the AI’s objectives with our own. For example,

“you say, “Make some paperclips.” And it turns the entire planet into a vast junkyard of

paperclips (Russell, 2015, as cited in Wolchover, 2015, para.18). The basic tasks that people

demand from robots can lead to unwanted results. However, of course, the actual problem that

humanity might face is more horrendous than just a vast junkyard of paperclips. Samuelsson

(2022) states that the AI might convert the earth into a research facility, deleting all functions not

linked to the goal, including all biological life to carry out a task. Just like how ant hills are being

removed by a construction crew to build a new highway. Construction crew are not evil people

who hate ants and kill them out of fun; yet, if there is a need for a new highway ants need to

be annihilated. In the event that humanity’s and robots’ goals are not aligned, modern society

will be in the position of those ants. Another consequence of conscious robots on humanity is that

humans might lose their moral standing on earth and be decimated if not completely wiped out.
Humans regard intelligence as the foundation of human evolution. The human race has

dominated this world for ages not because they are the most powerful or the fastest beings but

because they are the smartest and have the ability to adapt and change. Hawking (2014) states

that compared to humans, robots have no biological restrictions and will be able to develop

themselves over and over and surpass humans’ intelligence. Humans do not stand a chance

against robots and will be crushed. These robots will constantly elevate their consciousness, and

they will do it every second of every day without resting. Whatever humans can do; robots can do

multiple times better. When these conscious machines conclude that humans are no longer

needed and a threat to their society to preserve themselves, they will wipe out humanity far more

ruthlessly than the human race has done to so many unfortunate species that share this planet.

  Following this argument, having conscious robots in our lives is a great problem by

itself. Thinking that they will integrate with human society will not yield good results. I think

humans cannot handle conscious yet non-living beings, and the reason depends on social and

economic dynamics. One of them is the insufficient knowledge about conscious robots’

psychology. The theory of mind is something that people possess. This means you can empathize

with others. The most obvious example is that our perception of others depends on our own

sentiments and goals, which are based on our body’s demands. As a result, our conscious

understanding may correspond to biological recognition (Brian, 2018). Humans can never relate

to robots fully. AI’s or robots do not have a body or a brain, and no matter how conscious they

get, they will never achieve the biological evolution that humans have reached. Knowledge works

similarly to power, as when we know every possible detail about something, we can co-exist with

it. When we interact with people, for example, we have a general understanding of how they will

react to certain situations. That is how we adjust our behaviours around others. However, we do
not know the robots’ reactions or capabilities; some people may interact negatively with them,

which would make enticing empathy for them hard. This would cause tension between humans

and these beings, similar in dynamics and effects to today’s racial tensions in certain countries.

Another reason is not having enough access to conscious robots. These developed, intelligent

beings would probably not be available in every household, restaurant or mall. They would be

exclusive to the rich or people who invested in AI from the start. The economic gap between rich

and poor will be more visible and chaotic. Tied together with the first reason, this also affects the

general public’s perception of the situation. If they are not accessible to the general public, it will

undoubtedly create a menacing aura behind these beings, and most people will be uncomfortable

when seeing them.

To conclude, having conscious robots in society will negatively affect society for two main

reasons. One is that robots can destroy humans' lives to achieve their goals, and the other reason

is that the human population will be wiped out from the earth due to robots' constant

development. On top of that, humans are not ready to handle living with conscious yet non-living

beings because of insufficient knowledge and the availability of sentient robots. Humans should

reconsider if all this power and advanced technology that will be achieved by robots are worth

the risk that humanity will bear in the end. As Bostrom (2014) states, the future world may

become much more powerful and dynamic, but humanity will not be able to witness it.
References

Bostrom, N. Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.

Cellan-Jones, R. (2014, December 2). Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end

mankind. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30290540

King, B. (2018). Could a robot be conscious? Philosophy Now.

https://philosophynow.org/issues/125/Could_a_Robot_be_Conscious

Samuelsson, P. C. (2022). Artificial consciousness: Our greatest ethical challenge. In

Department of Modern Languages (Ed.), ENG 102 coursebook (pp. 89-92). Middle

East Technical University.

Wolchover, N. (2015, April 21). Concerns of an artificial intelligence pioneer. Quanta

magazine.

https://www.quantamagazine.org/artificial-intelligence-aligned-with-human- values-qa-

with-stuart-russell-20150421

You might also like