Isoquant
Isoquant
Isoquant
An isoquant shows all the combination of two factors that produce a given output
In this diagram, the isoquant shows all the combinations of labour and capital
that can produce a total output (Total Physical Product TPP) of 4,000. In the
above isoquant, this could be
20 capital and 18 labour or (more capital intensive)
9 capital and 35 labour. (more labour intensive
An isoquant is usually shaped concave because of the law of diminishing returns.
With fixed capital employing extra workers gives a declining increase in the
marginal product (MP)
If the firm employs 2 L and 40 K. Then employing one extra worker can enable it
to save 10K. This is quite an efficient saving. The firm only has to pay one extra
worker but can save the cost of 40.
As one moves down the isoquant, output remains the same. Therefore the output
gained from employing more labour must equal the output lost from employing
more capital.
Isoquant map
I1 may show the combinations of capital and labour that can produce
4,000 TPP.
I2 may show the combinations of capital and labour that can produce
5,000 TPP.
I5 is a higher output than I4
In the short-term, a firm faces a trade-off along one particular isoquant. But, in
the long-term, a firm can invest in increasing capital stock and produce at a
higher output for the same quantity of labour.
Isocost
An isocost shows all the combination of factors that cost the same to employ.
If we employ 30K and 30L, the total cost will be £200,000 + £200,000
If we employ 10 K and 50L, the total cost will be £66,666 +£333,333 =
£400,000
Change in labour costs
In this example, initially, the cost of labour and capital is both £5,000. (e.g.
60L = 60 x £5,000 = £300,000)
However, if Labour cost rises to £10,000, then the isocost shifts to the left.
Now, to keep cost at £300,000, a firm could only employ 30 workers (30 x
£10,000)
The slope of an isocost is therefore Pι / Pκ
Profit maximisation
To maximise profits, a firm will wish to produce at the point of the highest
possible isoquant and minimum possible isocost
In this example, we have one isocost and three isoquants. With the isocost of
£400,000 the maximum output a firm can manage would be a TPP of 4,000. If it
produced at say 13 K and 48 Labour, it would only be able to produce a TPP of
3,500.
A total TPP of 4,500 is currently not possible without increasing costs beyond
£400,000
It is thus proved that the slope of the budget line BL represents the
ratio of the prices of two goods.
MRSXY = PX/PY
a. If MRSXY > PX/PY, it means that the consumer is willing to pay more
for X than the price prevailing in the market. As a result, the consumer
buys more of X. As a result, MRS falls till it becomes equal to the ratio
of prices and the equilibrium is established.
b. If MRSXY < PX/PY, it means that the consumer is willing to pay less
for X than the price prevailing in the market. It induces the consumer
to buys less of X and more of Y. As a result, MRS rises till it becomes
equal to the ratio of prices and the equilibrium is established.
In Fig. 2.12, IC1, IC2 and IC3 are the three indifference curves and AB is
the budget line. With the constraint of budget line, the highest
indifference curve, which a consumer can reach, is IC2. The budget line
is tangent to indifference curve IC2 at point ‘E’. This is the point of
consumer equilibrium, where the consumer purchases OM quantity of
commodity ‘X’ and ON quantity of commodity ‘Y.
All other points on the budget line to the left or right of point ‘E’ will
lie on lower indifference curves and thus indicate a lower level of
satisfaction. As budget line can be tangent to one and only one
indifference curve, consumer maximizes his satisfaction at point E,
when both the conditions of consumer’s equilibrium are satisfied:
In Fig. 2.12, IC1, IC2 and IC3 are the three indifference curves and AB is
the budget line. With the constraint of budget line, the highest
indifference curve, which a consumer can reach, is IC2. The budget line
is tangent to indifference curve IC2 at point ‘E’. This is the point of
consumer equilibrium, where the consumer purchases OM quantity of
commodity ‘X’ and ON quantity of commodity ‘Y.
All other points on the budget line to the left or right of point ‘E’ will
lie on lower indifference curves and thus indicate a lower level of
satisfaction. As budget line can be tangent to one and only one
indifference curve, consumer maximizes his satisfaction at point E,
when both the conditions of consumer’s equilibrium are satisfied: