Jacob Strand Lawsuit
Jacob Strand Lawsuit
Jacob Strand Lawsuit
CV22-12-895
No. __________________
Defendants.
COME NOW, Jacob Strand, as Personal Representative of Athena Strand, deceased; and
files this Original Petition, Jury Demand, and Request for Disclosure against Defendants Tanner
Homer ("Homer" ), Big Topspin, Inc., ("Big Topspin" ) and Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
I. INTRODUCTION
I. This is a tragic case involving a seven (7) year old girl whose life was taken from
her when she was taken from the front yard of her home by a FedEx Ground delivery person.
Tanner Homer, an employee of Big Topspin, Inc and/or FedEx Ground, drove along a
predetermined route set by Big Topspin, Inc. and FedEx Ground to deliver a package to Athena's
home. Athena was playing in the front yard during this delivery. During the delivery Mr. Homer
hit Athena with his FedEx van. Mr. Homer while wearing a FedEx uniform either took Athena
into the van or enticed her to enter the van. Mr. Homer stated after his arrest that Athena was not
seriously hurt during the delivery. Mr. Homer told law enforcement that he was concerned Athena
would report that she had been hit by the FedEx van. Mr. Homer told law enforcement that while
Athena was in his FedEx vehicle, he tried to break Athena's neck, failed, and then strangled her
until she died. Mr. Homer then drove Athena's body in his FedEx truck and concealed Athena's
body in a remote area. Mr. Homer told law enforcement that he killed Athena because he was
worried that Athena would tell her dad that she had been hit by the FedEx vehicle.
conducted under Level 3 of Rule 190.3 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
3. As required by Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 47, Plaintiff states that they are
IV. PARTIES
individual residing in Paradise, Texas. The last three digits of his driver's license number are 423
and the last three digits of his social security number are 197.
Texas. He may be served at 200 Rook Ramsey Dr., Decatur, TX 76234 or wherever he may be
found.
Dallas County, Texas and may be served with process through its registered agent Richard G.
2
7. Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. is a foreign corporation doing
business in Texas and may be served with process by serving its registered agent, CT
8. This Court has personal jurisdiction over all of the parties in this suit because
some or substantially all of Defendants' tortious acts occurred in Wise County, Texas and form
9. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this lawsuit because the amount in
I 0. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Texas Civil Practices & Remedies Code
§ I 5.002(a)(l) because all or a substantial part of the events giving rise to the Plaintiffs claims
11. Athena Strand was a seven (7) year old girl. She lived with both her father Jacob
Strand and her mother Maitlyn Gandy. Jacob and Maitlyn had divorced and shared custody of
Athena. Jacob and Maitlyn are the sole beneficiaries under Texas ' s Wrongful Death Statute.
12. On November 30, 2022 in the afternoon Athena was playing in the front yard of
13. At 18 :41 hours Athena' s stepmother and Jacob' s wife, Elizabeth Strand, called 911
15. Wise County Sheriff's Deputies learned that FedEx Ground had delivered a
3
16. Wise County Sheriffs Deputies learned that the FedEx Ground route that Athena's
17. Law enforcement was able to obtain video from the FedEx Ground van that had
made the delivery to Athena's home. An FBI employee viewed the video and was able to discern
that the driver of the FedEx Ground vehicle had taken a young girl matching Athena's appearance
18. Law enforcement located Defendant Homer, mirandized him, and interviewed him.
Defendant Homer stated that when he was backing up in his FedEx Ground vehicle, he accidentally
hit Athena with his vehicle. Defendant Horner stated that Athena was not seriously injured by his
FedEx vehicle. Defendant Homer stated he panicked after hitting Athena with the FedEx Ground
19. Defendant Homer stated Athena was alive when he placed her in bis FedEx vehicle.
Defendant said Athena was talking to him. Defendant Horner stated he tried to break Athena's
neck, failed to do so, and then strangled her to death in the back of his FedEx Ground vehicle.
20. Defendant Homer told law enforcement that he strangled Athena because she was
going to tell her father about being hit by the FedEx Ground vehicle Defendant Horner was
operating.
21. Defendant Horner never reported to Big Topspin or FedEx ground that he had hit
22. Defendant Tanner Horner is an employee of Big Topspin and is authorized to wear
a FedEx Ground uniform and drive a vehicle conspicuously bearing the FedEx Ground logo to
deliver packages to FedEx Ground customers who live on FedEx Ground routes that Big Topspin
4
23. FedEx Ground retains significant control over the specific manner in which Big
Topspin and its employees and contractors deliver FedEx Ground packages and maintains
24. FedEx Ground delivery drivers have recently committed numerous assaults, rapes
and murders of persons across the country. In each of these cases FedEx stated that they were
"appalled". In 2021 a New York a delivery driver lured teenagers into his FedEx delivery vehicle
and sexually assaulted the teenagers. In 2022 a FedEx driver located in Utica, New York murdered
a woman on his route and burned her house to the ground. In March of 2022 a FedEx driver in
Connecticut broke into a woman 's home on his route and held her at gunpoint. On December 22,
2021 a FedEx Ground driver in North Carolina was charged with breaking into 11 homes along
his FedEx delivery route: stolen jewelry and guns were located in the driver's FedEx Ground
vehicle.
25. In this case a FedEx spokeswoman addressed the media as follows, "words cannot
describe our shock and sorrow at the reports surrounding this tragic event".
26. FedEx has continued their normal business operations although it is clear that their
current efforts, if any, to ensure that they are not putting dangerous persons in a position of trust
wearing FedEx uniforms, driving FedEx branded vehicles, and sending them to the doorsteps of
the homes of nearly every person in America is woefully inadequate to avoid endangering the
public.
27. To the extent not inconsistent herewith. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all of
5
28. Defendant Tanner Horner intentionally, knowingly, and recklessly made contact
with Athena Strand's body including but not limited to striking her to attempt to break her neck
29. Big Topspin and FedEx Ground are jointly and severally liable for the acts and/or
omissions of Defendant Homer through the theories ofrespondeat superior, ostensible agency,
30. Defendant Homer's wrongful conduct resulted in the following damages: past and
future medical and burial expenses; past and future pain and suffering; past and future mental
anguish; past and future lost earning capacity; past and future lost income; past and future loss of
consortium; past and future loss of society and companionship; and past and future loss of
enjoyment of life. In addition to each of these damages, Plaintiffs also seek prejudgment and
SYSTEM, INC.
32. Big Topspin and FedEx Ground each had a duty to exercise ordinary care, that is,
to do what a person of ordinary prudence would have done under the same or similar
circumstances.
33. Big Topspin and FedEx Ground did not use that degree of care that would be used
34. Big Topspin and FedEx Ground breached the duty of care, including but not
6
a. In the negligent hiring of Defendant Tanner Horner;
drivers;
35. Each and all of the foregoing acts, both of omission and commission, were
negligent and constituted negligence, and were each and all, independently and/or concurrently
the sole proximate cause of the incident and damages to Plaintiff made the basis of this suit,
including past and past and future medical and burial expenses; past and future pain and suffering;
past and future mental anguish; past and future lost earning capacity; past and future lost income;
past and future loss of consortium; past and future loss of society and companionship; and past
and future loss of enjoyment of life. In addition to each of these damages, Plaintiffs also seek
7
36. To the extent not inconsistent herewith, Plaintiff incorporates by reference all of
37. Big Topspin and FedEx Ground supplied Defendant Horner with the FedEx vehicle
that he drove to Athena Strand's home as well as a FedEx Ground uniform to wear.
38. Big Topspin and FedEx Ground knew or should have known that Defendant Horner
would use the motor vehicle in a manner involving an unreasonable risk of harm as described in
the paragraphs above. Big Topspin and FedEx Ground have been further negligent with allowing
Defendant Horner to work as a delivery driver in a residential area in which he came into contact
39. The death of Athena Strand resulted from Defendant Homer's use of his FedEx
Ground uniform and vehicle, resulting in the following damages to Plaintiff: past and past and
future medical and burial expenses; past and future pain and suffering; past and future mental
anguish; past and future lost earning capacity; past and future lost income; past and future loss of
consortium; past and future loss of society and companionship; and past and future loss of
enjoyment of life. In addition to each of these damages, Plaintiffs also seek prejudgment and post-
40. To the extent not inconsistent herewith, Plaintiff incorporates by reference all of
41 . Big Topspin and FedEx Ground's course of conduct shows a reckless indifference
to consequences without the exertion of any substantial effort to avoid them. Big Topspin and
FedEx Ground acted willfully, wantonly, and/or with reckless disregard to the consequences to
8
Plaintiff. Big Topspin and FedEx Ground actions and inactions constituted an extreme risk of
harm to the public, including Athena Strand. Big Topspin and FedEx Ground's had a subjective
awareness of this risk and proceeded in spite of the risk with conscious indifference.
42. Big Topspin and FedEx Ground as a result of their conduct, policies, failure to
train, failure to investigate, failure to supervise, and other acts and omissions, had subjective
knowledge that hiring and retaining Defendant Tanner Horner would involve an unreasonable
risk of harm to FedEx Ground's and Big Topspin's customers and hired and retained Mr. Homer
43. Defendant Homer's conduct resulted form the actions and inaction of corporate
officers, directors and managers of Big Topspin and FedEx Ground in one or more of the
following respects:
drivers;
9
k. In failing to monitor company compliance with safety policies and procedures;
and,
44. Big Topspin and FedEx Ground acts and/or omissions as described above
proximately caused harm to Plaintiff which resulted in the following damages: past and past and
future medical and burial expenses; past and future pain and suffering; past and future mental
anguish; past and future lost earning capacity; past and future lost income; past and future loss of
consortium; past and future loss of society and companionship; and past and future loss of
enjoyment of life. In addition to each of these damages, Plaintiffs also seek prejudgment and
45. To the extent not inconsistent herewith, Plaintiff incorporates by reference all of
46. Defendants acted with gross negligence and malice, which justifies an award of
punitive damages under Texas law. The acts or omissions of Defendants constitute gross
negligence and malice, as those terms are defined in Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code
47. Further, the limit on exemplary damages in Texas Civil Practice and Remedies
Code section 41.008 does not apply because Plaintiff seek recovery of exemplary damages based
48. The grossly negligent and malicious acts and/or omissions of Defendants were a
proximate cause of actual damages to Plaintiff in an amount within the jurisdictional limits of
49. Plaintiff respectfully request that the trial of this cause be by jury, and Plaintiffs
50. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civi I Procedure 194, Plaintiff requests that Defendant
disclose within fifty (50) days of service of this request, the information and/or material described
in Rule 194.2.
XIV. PRAYER
5 L. For these reasons, Plaintiff asks that the court issue citation for Defendants to
appear and answer, and that Plaintiff be awarded a judgment against Defendant for the following:
11
n. All other relief to which Plaintiff may be justly entitled, at low or in equity.
Respectfully submitted
--and--
pbelew@gmail.com
12