Neurophysiologic Basis of EEG: Piotr Olejniczak
Neurophysiologic Basis of EEG: Piotr Olejniczak
Neurophysiologic Basis of EEG: Piotr Olejniczak
Summary: This review article introduces the reader to the very basics of electroencephalography (EEG). It tries to explain in simple terms the physiologic principles of EEG generation and organization at the cellular, cortical and subcortical levels. It also introduces the basic EEG terminology (see the key words). Key Words: EEG, Postsynaptic potentials, Volume conduction, Propagation, Synchronization, Desynchronization. (J Clin Neurophysiol 2006;23: 186189)
VOLUME CONDUCTION
The EEG can be obtained because of the process of current ow through the tissues between the electrical generator and the recording electrode, which is called volume conduction. EEG provides a two-dimensional projection of three-dimensional reality, which means that theoretically it is impossible to determine the location of the EEG generator based on scalp-recorded EEG information alone. This is referred to as the inverse problem.
tinuum. Only synaptic activity readily fullls those criteria and is most signicant source of EEG potentials. Each synapse acts like a battery driving current in a small loop. Both excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) contribute to the synaptic activity recorded as EEG (Fig. 2). The summation of extracellular currents is slow enough to be able to generate EEG potentials. The current owing across the external resistance of the cortex sums with the loop currents of the neighboring neurons to constitute a local mean eld (Fig. 3). Viewed from outside the cells, membrane areas where current ows in or out of the cells are called respectively sinks and sources. Excitatory currents, involving Na or Ca2 ions, ow inward toward an excitatory synapse and outward away from it. The outward current is referred as a passive return current (from intracellular to extracellular space). Inhibitory loop currents, involving Cl and K ions, ow in the opposite direction. Scalp electrodes record potential differences that are caused by postsynaptic potentials in the cell membrane of cortical neurons. The closed loops of the lighter dashed lines represent the summation of extracellular currents produced by the postsynaptic potentials; the open segments of heavier dashed lines connect all points having the same voltage level. The two scalp electrodes are at different voltage levels and record this difference (Fig. 4).
Epilepsy Center of Excellence at the LSU Health Sciences Center in New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S.A. Paper presented on 12-02-2005 at the course EEG: The Basics during the Joint Meeting of the American Epilepsy Society and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society in Washington, D.C. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Piotr Olejniczak, Louisiana State University Healthcare Network, 5329 Didesse Street, Baton Rouge, LA 70815, U.S.A.; e-mail: polejn@lsuhsc.edu. Copyright 2006 by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society ISSN: 0736-0258/06/2303-0186
186
FIGURE 1. Simultaneous intracranial and scalp EEG recording of a temporal lobe seizure. The channels in the upper third of the picture represent intracranial contacts, whereas the ones in the lower part represent the scalp contacts. The intracranial recording appears to be generally more regular and of higher amplitude then the scalp one, which appears to be attenuated (from Ebersole, 2003)
FIGURE 2. Generation of extracellular voltage fields from graded synaptic activity (from Martin, 1991). Relationship between polarity of surface potentials and site of dendritic postsynaptic potentials.
hyperpolarization of the membrane caused by activation of the Ca2 -mediated K conductance. These AHPs are comparable in amplitude and duration to the synaptic events, and as such, may contribute to extracellularly recorded EEG potentials. An example of AHPs may be the generation of delta waves in sleep. In the awake brain, subcortical neurotransmitters such as acetylcholine, catecholamines and histamine reduce the calcium-mediated potassium conductance, blocking the AHP-related delta waves.
cium inux into the neurons. Postictally increased K levels produce propagating waves across the astrocytes manifested by slowly spreading sustained potentials. Astrocytes release more K , that way depolarizing the neurons and blocking the afterdischarge with resulting postictal depression.
NEURONGLIA INTERACTIONS
The astrocytes are connected by gap junctions that allow spread of current and diffusion of molecular transport. This coupling allows spreading Ca2 waves triggering calCopyright 2006 by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society
187
P. Olejniczak
FIGURE 3. Schematic of a brain cross section, illustrating four representative cortical EEG sources (from Ebersole, 2003). Sources 2 and 3 produce radial fields, so the negative, so the negative voltage maximum is directly above them. Sources 1 and 4 produce tangential fields and both negative and positive voltage maxima are displaced to either side.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POLARITY OF SURFACE POTENTIALS AND SITE OF DENDRITIC POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIALS
Source area is maximal for a given electrode when the orientation of the active cortical region is face-on. This is the case when the voltage eld is radial and electrode right above the source. A radial source produces eld maximal directly above it, and another one with opposite polarity on the opposite side of the head. For a supercial source, the scalp maximum nearest it is signicantly greater than the one on the opposite side of the head. Single-voltage eld maximum cannot be used to dene the location and/or orientation of a cortical EEG generator. Except for a purely radial source, the EEG eld maxima are displaced from a position directly above it. The location of both negative and positive eld maxima and their relative strengths must be taken into consideration.
FIGURE 4. Relationship between EEG slow waves and thalamic intracellular potentials (from Steriade et al., 1993).
produce the synchrony of cortical postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) during wakefulness and sleep. The facultative pacemaker theory assumes that thalamocortical relay neurons send bers to the cortex as well as give off branches that turn back and end on thalamic inhibitory interneurons (biofeedback servomechanism). Nucleus reticularis hypothesis attributes the pacemaker properties to the nucleus reticularis thalami, whose cells release the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA in rhythmic bursts of depolarizations directed to the neurons of the dorsal thalamus and rostral brainstem. Alpha-frequency rhythms are generated in multiple cortical areas in addition to the occipitally dominant alpha rhythm. Local cortical connections seem to be more important in generating most alpha-frequency rhythms, although thalamocortical discharges may have limited inuence on posterior dominant alpha rhythm. Fast waking rhythms such as in beta- and gammafrequency bands are produced by cortical generators. Pontine cholinergic input to the thalamus inhibits the generators producing sleep transients such as sleep spindles and highamplitude delta waves. Sleep spindles appear to be a thalamocortical phenomenon. GABAergic neurons of the nucleus reticularis thalami discharge in rhythmic cycles. They project to thalamocortical relay neurons, which in turn project to widespread cortical neurons. The relay neurons discharge after GABA-release related inhibition subsides. That subsequently results in synchronized EPSPs in the cortex, which become visible by EEG.
Copyright 2006 by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society
188
Unlike sleep spindles, which require synaptic activities to establish the rhythmic oscillation, delta oscillation is an intrinsic rhythm that depends on potassium uxes at voltagedependent ion channels of cortical and thalamic neurons.
occur in the setting of widespread injury to the ascending neuronal systems that would otherwise produce arousal and desynchronization.
REFERENCES
Buzsaki G, Traub RD, Pedley TA. The cellular basis of EEG activity. In: Ebersole JS, Pedley TA, eds. Current practice of clinical electroencephalography. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2003:111. Ebersole JS. Cortical generators and EEG voltage elds. In: Ebersole JS, Pedley TA, eds. Current practice of clinical electroencephalography. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2003:1231. Fisch BJ. Fisch and Spehlmanns EEG primer. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1999. Martin JH. The collective electrical behavior of cortical neurons: the electroencephalogram and the mechanisms of epilepsy. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessel TM, eds. Principles of neural science. Norwalk: Appleton and Lange, 1991:77791. Steriade M, McCormick DA, Sejnowski T. Thalamocortical oscillations in the sleeping and aroused brain. Science. 1993;262:67985.
189