MM2 Lab Manual (Final)
MM2 Lab Manual (Final)
MM2 Lab Manual (Final)
Submitted by:
Submitted to:
Engr. Sheeraz
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Preface
The Mechanics of materials Laboratory Manual is written to describe the experiments in
Mechanics of Material Lab course. Each experiment procedure is explained thoroughly
along with related background. The experiments are selected to apply some concepts from
mechanics of materials such as analysis of materials properties based on tension, bending,
and torsion. Some complementary topics are also presented such as using of some measuring
tools. The use of these tools will help students to understand how to measure objects
precisely, which is a crucial skill in lab. Experimental data analysis techniques, such linear
regression, are also presented to help student to determine mathematical models based on
data obtained.
Data Sheet is developed for each experiment to help student learn how to manage
experimental data obtained and make it handy during calculations. The data sheet provides
tables listing parameters and variable needed to be measured or obtained through
experimental work. In addition, Post-Lab Assignments are given to enhance student
understanding of concepts being applied practically.
Part of this manual is developed based on information obtained from books referenced at
the last section of the manual. A sincere appreciation and credit should be given to authors
of these books. Students are encouraged to check these resources for more information or
interest in any topic.
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Contents
1. Lab Session 1 ..................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Objective: .................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Apparatus: ................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Summary of Theory: ................................................................................................... 1
1.3.1 Spring: .................................................................................................................. 1
1.3.2 Deformation in springs ........................................................................................ 1
1.3.3 Hooke’s Law ........................................................................................................ 2
1.3.4 Stiffness in Hooke’s Law: .................................................................................... 2
1.3.5 Material of spring ................................................................................................. 3
1.3.6 Types of spring according to loading conditions: ................................................ 3
1.4 Derivation of stiffness formula: .................................................................................. 3
1.5 Observation and Calculation ....................................................................................... 5
1.6 Specimen calculation................................................................................................... 7
1.7 Graph ........................................................................................................................... 8
1.8 Slope from Graph: ..................................................................................................... 10
2. Lab Session 2 ................................................................................................................... 13
2.1 Objective ................................................................................................................... 13
2.2 Apparatus .................................................................................................................. 13
2.3 Summary of Theory: ................................................................................................. 13
2.3.1 Spring ................................................................................................................. 13
2.3.2 Deformations in springs ..................................................................................... 13
2.4 Hooke’s law: ............................................................................................................. 13
2.4.1 Material of spring ............................................................................................... 14
2.4.2 Types of springs according to loading conditions: ............................................ 14
2.5 Procedure:.................................................................................................................. 16
2.6 Observations and Calculations .................................................................................. 17
2.7 Specimen calculation................................................................................................. 19
2.8 Graph ......................................................................................................................... 20
2.9 Slope from Graph ...................................................................................................... 22
2.10 Applications .............................................................................................................. 23
2.11 Statistical Analysis: ................................................................................................... 23
2.11.1 Standard Deviation............................................................................................. 23
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
2.12 Conclusion................................................................................................................. 24
3. Lab Session #03 ............................................................................................................... 25
3.1 Objective: .................................................................................................................. 25
3.2 Apparatus: ................................................................................................................. 25
3.3 Summary of Theory: ................................................................................................. 25
3.3.1 Spiral Spring ...................................................................................................... 25
3.3.2 Spiral spring configuration ................................................................................ 26
3.3.3 Torsion Spring ................................................................................................... 26
3.3.4 Characteristics: ................................................................................................... 27
3.4 Procedure:.................................................................................................................. 27
3.5 Observations & Calculations..................................................................................... 27
3.5.1 Standard deviation ............................................................................................. 29
3.6 Graph ......................................................................................................................... 29
3.7 Industrial Applications .............................................................................................. 32
3.8 Conclusion................................................................................................................. 33
3.8.1 Comments .......................................................................................................... 33
4. Lab Session 4 ................................................................................................................... 34
4.1 Objective ................................................................................................................... 34
4.2 Apparatus .................................................................................................................. 34
4.3 Summary of Theory .................................................................................................. 34
4.3.1 Purpose of beams ............................................................................................... 34
4.3.2 Types of beams .................................................................................................. 34
4.3.3 Cantilever Beam................................................................................................. 35
4.3.4 Overhanging Beam ............................................................................................ 35
4.3.5 Fixed Beams....................................................................................................... 35
4.3.6 Continuous Beam ............................................................................................... 36
4.3.7 Simply Supported Beam .................................................................................... 36
4.4 Procedure ................................................................................................................... 36
4.5 Observations and Calculations .................................................................................. 37
4.5.1 Macaulay’s method ............................................................................................ 37
4.6 Graph ......................................................................................................................... 40
4.6.1 Experimental ...................................................................................................... 40
4.6.2 Theoretical ......................................................................................................... 41
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
List of tables
Table 1 ....................................................................................................................................... 5
Table 2 ....................................................................................................................................... 5
Table 3 ....................................................................................................................................... 6
Table 4 ....................................................................................................................................... 6
Table 5 ..................................................................................................................................... 17
Table 6 ..................................................................................................................................... 17
Table 7 ..................................................................................................................................... 18
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Table 8 ..................................................................................................................................... 18
Table 9 ..................................................................................................................................... 28
Table 10 ................................................................................................................................... 39
Table 11 ................................................................................................................................... 47
Table 12 ................................................................................................................................... 53
Table 13 ................................................................................................................................... 56
Table 14 ................................................................................................................................... 63
Table 15 ................................................................................................................................... 63
Table 16 ................................................................................................................................... 69
Table 17 ................................................................................................................................... 77
List of figures
Figure 1 ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Figure 2 ...................................................................................................................................... 2
Figure 3 ...................................................................................................................................... 3
Figure 4 .................................................................................................................................... 14
Figure 5 .................................................................................................................................... 14
Figure 6 .................................................................................................................................... 15
Figure 7 .................................................................................................................................... 15
Figure 8 .................................................................................................................................... 15
Figure 9 .................................................................................................................................... 16
Figure 10 .................................................................................................................................. 25
Figure 11 .................................................................................................................................. 26
Figure 12 .................................................................................................................................. 26
Figure 13 .................................................................................................................................. 34
Figure 14 .................................................................................................................................. 35
Figure 15 .................................................................................................................................. 35
Figure 16 .................................................................................................................................. 35
Figure 17 .................................................................................................................................. 36
Figure 18 .................................................................................................................................. 36
Figure 19 .................................................................................................................................. 37
Figure 20 .................................................................................................................................. 44
Figure 21 .................................................................................................................................. 45
Figure 22 .................................................................................................................................. 45
Figure 23 .................................................................................................................................. 45
Figure 24 .................................................................................................................................. 46
Figure 25 .................................................................................................................................. 46
Figure 26 .................................................................................................................................. 47
Figure 27 .................................................................................................................................. 50
Figure 28 .................................................................................................................................. 51
Figure 29 .................................................................................................................................. 55
Figure 30 .................................................................................................................................. 67
Figure 31 .................................................................................................................................. 68
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Figure 32 .................................................................................................................................. 68
Figure 33 .................................................................................................................................. 71
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
1. Lab Session 1
1.1 Objective:
To determine how the stiffness of a compression spring is affected by the physical
dimensions of the springs.
1.2 Apparatus:
• Compression of Spring Apparatus
• Springs of different dimensions
• Hangers
• Weights
Figure 1
1|Page
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Any spring should be designed so that it only experiences up to elastic deformation mostly
for efficient working.
𝑭 = 𝒌𝒙
Figure 2
2|Page
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Other metals that are sometimes used to make springs are beryllium copper alloy, phosphor
bronze, and titanium. Rubber or urethane may be used for cylindrical, non-coil springs.
Ceramic material has been developed for coiled springs in very high-temperature
environments. One-directional glass fibre composite materials are being tested for possible
use in springs.
• Tension/extension spring
• Compression spring
• Torsion spring
• Constant spring
Figure 3
Let,
W = axial load
3|Page
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
G = modulus of rigidity
∆ = deflection of spring
Φ = Angle of twist
It states that “The derivative of the strain energy with respect to the applied load gives
the deformation corresponding to that load”.
• To fit a new compression spring, remove the load hanger base by unscrewing the
grip knob and base from the rod thread.
• Loosen or remove the grip knob on the marker and pull the load hanger down until
the top can be swung out from the slot by the 50 mm scale.
• The rod can now be threaded through the central hole in a compression spring and
reverse the above procedure to return the apparatus to full working condition.
• Clamp the marker so that the horizontal line is in line with the zero reading of the
displacement scale.
• Measure the diameter of wire and outer diameter of each spring with the help of
Vernier calliper.
• Load the spring by 5N increments recording the change in length of the spring up
to the greatest readable deflection or the max load of25N.
4|Page
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
• Repeat the same process for other springs and record the readings.
Table 1
No. Deflection
Load
of (∆) mm
(W) N
Obs. Spring A
1. 5 1.25
2. 10 2.45
3. 15 3.7
4. 20 4.9
Table 2
No. Deflection
Load
of (∆) mm
(W) N
Obs. Spring B
1. 10 0.6
2. 20 1.1
3. 30 1.7
4. 40 2.2
5 50 2.9
5|Page
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Table 3
No. Deflection
Load
of (∆) mm
(W) N
Obs. Spring C
1. 1 0.7
2. 2 1.3
3. 3 1.9
4. 4 2.55
5. 5 3.25
Table 4
Spring data
A B C
Wire diameter (d)
0.2 0.2 1.5 mm
Spring O/D mm
1.3 20.2 1.07
6|Page
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
For Spring A
0.24 41
𝑆𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 𝑘 =
8(9)30.73
31488𝑁
𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 =
𝑚𝑚2
K = F/x
For Spring B
0.24 79
𝑆𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 𝑘 =
8(9)203
𝑁
𝑆𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 21944
𝑚𝑚2
K = F/x
For Spring C
1.54 41
𝑆𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 𝑘 =
8(10)283
N
𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 118191
mm2
7|Page
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
K = F/x
1.7 Graph
Spring A
5.0
4.5
4.0
Deflection (mm)
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Load (N)
Spring B
8|Page
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
3.0
2.5
Deflection (mm)
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
10 20 30 40 50
Load (N)
Spring C
3.0
2.5
Deflection (mm)
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
1 2 3 4 5
Load (N)
9|Page
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
2.45 − 1.25
𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 =
10 − 5
Slope = 0.24
For spring B
1.7 − 1.1
𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 =
30 − 20
Slope = 0.06
10 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
For spring C
1.3 − 0.7
𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 =
2−1
Slope = 0.6
For spring A
S = 1.51
For spring B
𝑆 = 0.69
For spring C
S = 0.77
11 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
1.9 Conclusion:
• A higher spring constant means a stiffer spring, and vice-versa.
• Shorter members are stiffer than longer members.
• Members with large cross-sectional areas are stiffer than those with smaller cross-
sectional areas.
• "Stiffer springs" are more "responsive" compared to stock springs, in the sense that
they can handle the momentum of the vehicle in a turn with “better" than the stock
spongy spring set up. You are driving in the same turn with the same speed, same
tires, same weight and same momentum.
• A stiffer spring with a constant mass decreases the period of oscillation. Increasing
the mass increases the period of oscillation. For example, a heavy car with springs
in its suspension bounces more slowly when it hits a bump than a light car with
identical springs.
12 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
2. Lab Session 2
2.1 Objective
To determine how the stiffness of an extension spring is affected by the physical
dimensions and material of the springs.
2.2 Apparatus
• Extension of spring apparatus
• Extension springs of different materials and dimensions
• Hangers
• Weight
Any spring should be designed so that it only experience upto elastic deformation mostly
for efficient working.
F = kx
13 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Figure Figure
2. 1: Hooks
4 law
Other metals that are sometimes used to make springs are beryllium copper
alloy, phosphor bronze, and titanium. Rubber or urethane may be used for cylindrical, non-
coil springs. Ceramic material has been developed for coiled springs in very high-
temperature environments. One-directional glass fibre composite materials are being tested
for possible use in springs.
Figure 2. Figure
2: Tension
5 Spring
14 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Figure 6
Figure 2.Figure
3: Torsion
7 spring
Figure 8
15 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Figure 2. 4:
Figure
Variable
9 Spring
2.5 Procedure:
• An extension spring is already fitted to the apparatus on arrival.
• To fit a new extension spring, hang the end of the spring onto the spring support
at the top of the channel.
• Loosen the fluted grip knob, which clamps the fiducial marker on the loading rod,
and hook the load hanger flat eye onto the bottom loop of the spring.
• Slide the fiducial marker into the slot by the 50 mm scale, zero the marker and
clamp it in that position.
• Measure the diameter of wire and outer diameter of each spring with the help of
Vernier calliper.
• Load the spring by 5N increments recording the change in length of the spring up
to the greatest readable deflection or the max load of 25N.
• Record the spring dimensions of other springs.
• Repeat the same process for other springs and record the readings.
16 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Table 5
Deflection
Load (W)
No. of observation (∆) mm
N
Spring A
1 1 0.75
2 2 1.8
3 3 2.85
4 4 4
Table 6
Deflection
Load (W)
No. of observation (∆) mm
N
Spring B
1 10 0.1
2 20 0.3
3 30 0.85
4 40 2.1
5 50 3.4
17 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Table 7
Deflection
Load (W)
No. of observation (∆) mm
N
Spring C
1 1 33
2 2 53
3 3 73
4 4 92
Table 8
Spring
data
A (Iron) B (Iron) C (Steel)
N/mm
Theoretical stiffness 7872.2 9606.2 1300 2
18 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
𝑑4𝐺
𝑆𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 𝑘 =
8𝑁𝐷3
Where:
d = wire diameter
N = no. of turns
D = mean diameter
G = Modulus of rigidity
For spring A
0.24 41
𝑆𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 𝑘 =
8(36)30.73
K = F/x
For spring B
0.24 41
𝑆𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 𝑘 =
8(35)19.83
K = F/x
For spring C
14 79
𝑆𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 𝑘 =
8(30)293
𝑆𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 0.000013𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
19 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
K = F/x
2.8 Graph
For Spring A
4.0
3.5
Deflection (mm)
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
For Spring B
20 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
3.5
3.0
2.5
Deflection (mm)
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
10 20 30 40 50
Load (N)
For Spring C
90
80
Deflection (mm)
70
60
50
40
30
21 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
4 − 2.85
𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 =
4−3
Slope = 1.15
For spring B
2.1 − 0.85
𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 =
4−3
Slope = 1.25
22 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
For spring C
53 − 33
𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 =
2−1
Slope = 22
2.10 Applications
Following is the application of extension springs:
• The vise-grip type of pliers that not only grip but can be locked into position to keep
the grip tight use extension springs, which are employed to hold the grip in place.
• These springs are used in fence to shut the door.
• Trampolines is also equipped with extension springs to store and release energy.
For spring A
S = 1.39
For spring B
𝑆 = 0.899
For spring C
23 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
S = 25.46
2.12 Conclusion
• Deflection in the spring A and B are different. Both Material made from the same
material but both varies in no. of turns and diameter. Therefore, stiffness of both
materials also varies.
• Using more no. of turns in a spring lead to less deflection in the spring.
• From graph of spring C, it is quite significant that trend is not same. We can see
different trends when we apply more load to the spring.
• Stiffness of spring C is very low as compared to other springs.
• Form the statical analysis it is significant that there is problem with spring C.
24 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Figure 10
The spiral spring is made from flat strip or wire coiled up in the manner of the groove on a
phonograph record. As a mainspring or hairspring, it provides a compact source of energy
in clocks and watches; it is also used on typewriters and parking…
Torsion springs are a type of flat spiral coil or helical shaped spring used in applying a torque
or store rotational energy. Unlike other springs such as compression or extension springs
that require a linear force to push or a pull, torsion springs store and release rotational energy
via torque as a measure of force.
To make a spring, a coil of carbon spring or stainless steel is placed onto a former, which
curves the wire into the correct shape. After that, the top and bottom of the spring is ground
flat, so it can sit square on a flat surface. "They've got to be sitting straight so the force
generated is linear,"
25 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Figure 11
3.3.2.1 Application:
• Alarm Time-Piece
• Watch
• Automotive Seat Recliners
Figure 12
26 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
3.3.3.1 Applications
• Spring in hair clips.
• Mousetraps.
• Hand gripper in gyms.
• Robotics.
3.3.4 Characteristics:
• It is also a form of helical spring, but it rotates about an axis to create load.
• It releases the load in an arc around the axis as shown in figure.
• Mainly used for torque transmission
• The ends of the spring are attached to other application objects, so that if
the object rotates around the centre of the spring, it tends to push the spring
to retrieve its normal position.
3.4 Procedure:
• Clamp the spring to give a number of active turns from 3 to 8 inclusive.
• Note the initial scale reading with the load hanger on the cord.
• Then add a weight and note the scale reading.
• Tabulate your results.
Spring O/D= mm
Spring Thickness=1mm
27 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Table 9
NO. OF
LOAD DE FLECTION
ACTIVE
Sr. COILS (P) (Өº)
No (N) (N) Loading Unloading Mean
1 1 8 9 8.5
2 2 17 17 17
3 3 3 24 26 25
4 4 34 35 34.5
5 5 43 43 43
1 1 10 11 10.5
2 2 22 21 21.5
3 4 3 33 33 33
4 4 45 45 45
5 5 58 58 58
1 1 13 14 13.5
2 2 27 26 27.5
3 5 3 42 42 42
4 4 59 59 59
5 5 76 76 76
1 1 18 13 15.5
2 2 36 36 36
3 6 3 55 56 55.5
4 4 77 83 80
5 5 105 105 105
1 1 277 278 277.5
2 2 304 305.5
7 304.75
3 3 342 346 344
4 4 388 443 415.5
5 5 474 474 474
28 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
1 1 21 24 22.5
2 2 41 45 43
3 8 3 62 67 64.5
4 4 85 87 86
5 5 104 104 104
1
𝑆𝑥 = √ ((𝑥1 − 𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔. )2 + (𝑥1 − 𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔. )2 + (𝑥1 − 𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔. )2 + ⋯ )
𝑛−1
𝑆𝑥
1
= √ ((8.5 − 25.6)2 + (17 − 25.6)2 + (25 − 25.6)2 + (34.5 − 25.6)2 + (43 − 25.6)2
5−1
1
𝑆𝑥 = √ (292.41 + 73.96 + 0.36 + 79.21 + 302.76)
4
𝑆𝑥 = (187.175)1/2
𝑆𝑥 =13.68
3.6 Graph
No of turns 3
29 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Exp No 3 (Load&Deflection)
45
Deflection (Degree) 40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
1 2 3 4 5
Load (N)
No of turns 4
Exp No 3 (Load&Deflection)
60
50
Deflection (Degree)
40
30
20
10
1 2 3 4 5
Load (N)
No of turns 5
30 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Exp No 3 (Load&Deflection)
80
70
Deflection (Degree)
60
50
40
30
20
10
1 2 3 4 5
Load (N)
No of turns 6
Exp No 3 (Load&Deflection)
120
100
Deflection (Degree)
80
60
40
20
0
1 2 3 4 5
Load (N)
No of turns 7
31 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Exp No 3 (Load&Deflection)
500
450
Deflection (Degree)
400
350
300
250
1 2 3 4 5
Load (N)
No of turns 8
Exp No 3 (Load&Deflection)
120
100
Deflection (Degree)
80
60
40
20
1 2 3 4 5
Load (N)
32 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
3.8 Conclusion
We have analysed the whole procedure and found some useful results regarding the spiral
springs by changing the number of coils and loading and unloading the weights i.e., the trend
in all of the number of turns was the same as all the graphs were more or less increasing
linearly.
3.8.1 Comments
• We have seen by increasing number of turns deflection also increase
• By increasing number of turns chances of failure on each active turns of spring
decrease.
33 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
4. Lab Session 4
4.1 Objective
To determine the deflection at three different points of a propped cantilever
beam using a brass beam and compare with the theoretical values.
4.2 Apparatus
• Propped cantilever beam apparatus
• Weights
• Dial gauge
• Vernier Calliper
• Specimen
• Hangers
• Spanner
• Resist loads
• Counter bending moment and shear forces.
• Connect the frame.
• Provide a uniform distribution of loads
Figure 13
34 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
35 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Figure 17
Figure 18
4.4 Procedure
• Measure the width and depth of the beam with the help of scale to find the
moment of inertia of the beam.
• Set the apparatus and put the required hangers at different points.
• Measure the distances of each hanger from the reference end.
• Set the deflection dial gauge at zero after putting the hangers.
• Take the reading of deflection after putting the loads in the hangers.
• Repeat the process for different loads.
• Find the theoretical deflection and compare with the experimental values by
showing on a graph.
36 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Moment of Inertia for rectangular metal bar = I = bd3 /12= 476.46 𝑚𝑚4
𝑑2 𝑦
𝑀 = 𝐸𝐼 2
𝑑𝑥
Figure 19
𝑑𝑦 𝑅𝐴 𝑥 2 𝑊1 (𝑥 − 𝑎1 )2 𝑊2 (𝑥 − 𝑎2 )2 𝑊3 (𝑥 − 𝑎3 )2
𝐸𝐼 = − − − + 𝐶1
𝑑𝑥 2 2 2 2
𝑅𝐴 𝑥 3 𝑊1 (𝑥 − 𝑎1 )3 𝑊2 (𝑥 − 𝑎2 )3 𝑊3 (𝑥 − 𝑎3 )3
𝐸𝐼(𝑦) = − − − + 𝐶1 𝑥 + 𝐶2
6 6 6 6
37 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
1N 2N 3N
R
x R R
a 0.36 0.3 0.3 b
x
𝛴𝐹𝑥 = 𝑅𝑥 = 0
𝛴𝑀𝐴 = 0
𝑅𝐵 = 4.66𝑁
𝛴𝐹𝑦 = 0
𝑅𝐴 + 𝑅𝐵 = 1 + 2 + 3
𝑅𝐵 = 6 − 4.66 = 1.33𝑁
𝑑2𝑦
𝑀𝑥 = 1.33𝑥 − 1(𝑥 − 0.36) − 2(𝑥 − 0.44) − 3(𝑥 − 0.52) = 𝐸𝐼 2
𝑑𝑥
𝑥 = 0, 𝑦=0
Hence:
38 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
𝐶2 = 0
𝑥 = 𝐿 ,𝑦 = 0
0.04 + 6𝐶1 = 0
𝐶1 = 0.073
𝑦 = 23.121
Table 10
W1 W2 W3 δexp δth
1 1 2 3 6 20 23.12 13.14
3 2 2 3 7 30 39 13.14
4 4 3 3 10 40 49.1 13.14
39 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
70
Deflection EXP (mm)
60
50
40
30
20
6 8 10 12 14 16 18
LOAD (N)
40 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
4.6.2 Theoretical
Exp No 4 (Load&Deflection)
90
80
70
Deflection TH (mm)
60
50
40
30
20
6 8 10 12 14 16 18
LOAD (N)
Exp No 4 Experimental
90 Theoretical
80
70
% (Deflection (mm))
60
50
40
30
20
6 8 10 12 14 16 18
LOAD (N)
41 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
𝑥1 + 𝑥2 + 𝑥3 + 𝑥4 + 𝑥5
𝑀𝑒𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 =
𝑛
20 + 25 + 30 + 40 + 51 + 59 + 74
𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 =
7
𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 = 235.5
𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝐷𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
(𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 − 𝑥1 )2 + (𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 − 𝑥2 )2 + (𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 − 𝑥3 )2 + (𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 − 𝑥4 )2 + (𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 − 𝑥5 )2
= √
𝑛−1
𝑆. 𝐷
(235 − 20)2 + (235 − 25)2 + (235 − 30)2 + (235 − 40)2 + (235 − 51)2 + (235 − 59)2
= √
7−1
𝑆. 𝐷 = 136.7
4.9 Comments
• The deflection of a cantilevered beam depends on four factors: load, length, material of
beam, and cross-sectional shape
• If we move the load closer to support of cantilever beam if it's a point load then it reduce
the deflection
• For cantilevered beams, the maximum deflection will occur when the load is located at
the free end of the beam
• In a cantilever beam the maximum bending moment occurs at the fixed end. Moment
at the free end is 0 and maximum at the fixed end.
• In cantilever beams, the maximum shear force occurs at the fixed end. In the free end,
there is zero shear force
42 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
43 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
5. Lab session 5
5.1 Objective
To determine what levels of combined bending and torsion cause elastic failure
in different material and to compare them with various theories of failure
5.2 Apparatus
• Combined bending and torsion
• Weight
• Dial gauge
• Vernier Caliper
• Specimen
• Hanger
• Spanner
5.3 Theory
44 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Figure 21
5.3.2 Torque
Torque is a measure of the force that can cause an object to rotate about an
axis. Just as force is what causes an object to accelerate in linear kinematics, torque is what
causes an object to acquire angular acceleration. Torque is a vector quantity
Figure 22
Figure 23
45 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Figure 24
Figure 25
46 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Figure 26
5.4 Procedure
• Record the material and neck diameter for the test specimen being used into table 5.1.
• Place the apparatus near the corner of a worktop with the circular loading plate
overhanging the edge. The dial gauge side should face the other edge of the corner.
• Record the weight the of the load hanger. Put the first specimen in the apparatus and
clamp it as described above. Set the dial gauge diametrically opposite the zero degrees
load point and use the adjustable bezel to zero the outer ring against the large pointer.
• Put the load hanger on the zero-degree dimples and enter the dial gauge reading in the
column marked DTI rig in table 5.1. This will be the zero-load reading. Add 4Nto the
load hanger and again enter the dial reading in table 1a. In the column diff in table 1a,
fill in the difference, this should be similar to one before for linear elasticity.
• Repeat the 4n increments while carefully watching for a trend to increasing differences
as the linearity limit is reached. As the end of the linearity approaches reduce the load
increments to 2N and then 1N, reckoning the differences between successive load in
proportion. Try to stop adding more load before there is a 10% increase in the
differences.
• As soon as non-linearity is determined unload the hanger and remove it move the dial
gauge round by 15°and re-zero. Then repeat the above procedure. Carry on doing this
until the loading at 90° has been completed.
Table 11
47 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
5.6 Graph
Exp No 5 (Torque&Moment)
3
Moment (Nmm)
0 1 2 3 4
Torque (Nmm)
=2.45 Nmm
(4 − 2.45) + (3.86 − 2.45) + (3.46 − 2.45) + (2.8 − 2.45) + (2 − 2.25) + (1.03 − 2.45) + (0 − 2.45)
√
6
=1.5
48 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
4. Drive Shaft
5. Plate girders
6. Beams
5.9 Conclusion
When we apply load on a particular object, there will be some combined bending
stresses. The deviation between values due to friction and vibrations in a material is 1.5%.
5.10 Comments
• It is observed that with the increment in angle from 0 to 90 degrees, the value of bending
is reducing.
• With the increase in angle, torsion is also increasing.
• We should make a statistical analysis of all the forces before making a product.
• Dimensions should be in such an accurate way that there will be minimum or no elastic
failure in a material.
• Properties of materials and elastic failure theories will be helpful in a product
manufacturing.
49 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
6. Lab Session 6
6.1 Objective
To find out the horizontal and vertical deflection of a quarter circular beam loaded by
vertical load, using the Curved Bar Apparatus.
6.2 Apparatus
• Vernier Calliper
• Curved Bar Apparatus
• Weight
• Quarter circular beam apparatus
• Dial gauge
Figure 27
A bench mounted base supports a curved bar formed into a ring, semi-circle or
quadrant/davit. Loads are applied by specially designed weight hangers so that the specimen
bends. Horizontal and vertical deflections are measured by dial gauges rigidly attached to
the base. The bars can be readily changed and the position of the dial gauges relocated to
measure the deflections of the new configuration. Bars, weight hangers and a set of weights
are supplied.
50 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
This equipment is part of a range designed to both demonstrate and experimentally confirm
basic engineering principles. Great care has been given to each item so as to provide wide
experimental scope without unduly complicating or compromising the design. Each piece
of apparatus is self-contained and compact. Setting up time is minimal, and all
measurements are made with the simplest possible instrumentation, so that the student
involvement is purely with the engineering principles being taught.
The Curved Bars Apparatus can be readily changed and the position of the dial gauges
relocated to measure the deflections of the new configuration. All specimens, weight
hangers and a set of calibrated weights are supplied.
Figure 28
51 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
It states that if the strain energy U stored in an elastic structure is expressed as a function of
the generalized displacements, then the first partial derivative of U with respect to any one
of the generalized displacements is equal to the corresponding generalized force.
𝑀2 𝑑𝑥
U= ∫ 2𝐸𝐼
Procedure:
52 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Table 12
1
= √ ((0.1 − 28.22)2 + (11 − 28.22)2 + (27 − 28.22)2 + (44 − 28.22)2 + (59 − 28.22)2
5−1
1
𝑆𝑥 = √ (790.7344 + 296.5284 + 1.4884 + 249.0084 + 947.4084)
4
53 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
𝑆𝑥 = (571.292)1/2
𝑆𝑥 =23.90
1
=√ (0.15 − 27.83)2 + (10 − 27.83)2 + (25 − 27.83)2 + (43 − 27.83)2 + (61 − 27.83)2
5−1
1
𝑆𝑥 = √ (766.18 + 317.90 + 8.0089 + 230.12 + 1100.24)
4
𝑆𝑥 = (605.61)1/2
𝑆𝑥 =24.60
6.7 Comments
• Vertical Deflection are very high as compared to the horizontal deflections.
• The Reason of large vertical deflections is the weight is being applied vertically.
• The gravity is also acting in this direction.
• Applying a horizontal load will cause deflections in horizontal deflections more
prominent
54 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
7. Lab session 7
7.1 Objective
To find out the horizontal and vertical deflection of a semi-circular beam loaded by vertical
load, using the Curved Bar Apparatus.
7.2 Apparatus
• Vernier Calliper
• Curved Bar Apparatus
• Weight
• Quarter circular beam apparatus
• Dial gauge
Figure 29
A bench mounted base supports a curved bar formed into a ring, semi-circle or
quadrant/davit. Loads are applied by specially designed weight hangers so that the specimen
bends. Horizontal and vertical deflections are measured by dial gauges rigidly attached to
the base. The bars can be readily changed and the position of the dial gauges relocated to
measure the deflections of the new configuration. Bars, weight hangers and a set of weights
are supplied.
55 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
This equipment is part of a range designed to both demonstrate and experimentally confirm
basic engineering principles. Great care has been given to each item so as to provide wide
experimental scope without unduly complicating or compromising the design. Each piece
of apparatus is self-contained and compact. Setting up time is minimal, and all
measurements are made with the simplest possible instrumentation, so that the student
involvement is purely with the engineering principles being taught.
The Curved Bars Apparatus can be readily changed and the position of the dial gauges
relocated to measure the deflections of the new configuration. All specimens, weight
hangers and a set of calibrated weights are supplied.
7.4 Procedure
• Adjust the semi-circular bar.
• Attach two dial gauges for finding vertical as well as horizontal deflection.
• Load the bar for number of times by an equal amount of 1N each time and note the
corresponding readings from dial gauges attached to the apparatus, for vertical and
horizontal deflection.
• Multiply those observations with the least count of the dial gauges and note out the
final deflections.
Table 13
56 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
1
= √ ((0 − 40.3)2 + (4.5 − 40.3)2 + (38 − 40.3)2 + (48 − 40.3)2 + (111 − 40.3)2
5−1
1
𝑆𝑥 = √ (1624.09 + 1281.64 + 5.29 + 59.29 + 4998.49)
4
𝑆𝑥 = (1992.2)1/2
𝑆𝑥 =44.6
1
= √ (6 − 34.4)2 + (16 − 34.4)2 + (29 − 34.4)2 + (44 − 34.4)2 + (77 − 34.4)2
5−1
1
𝑆𝑥 = √ (806.56 + 338.56 + 29.16 + 92.16 + 1814.76)
4
𝑆𝑥 = (770.31)1/2
𝑆𝑥 =27.75
7.7 Graph
Horizontal Deflection (Experimental & Theoretical)
57 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
1400
Horizontal Deflection (δH) (mm)
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0 2 4 6
Load (W) (N)
4000
Horizontal Deflection (δH) (mm)
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
0 2 4 6
Load (W) (N)
58 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
7.9 Conclusions
• From analytical values it was observed that, as the load increases horizontal and
vertical deflections both increase significantly.
• The horizontal deflection is more compared to vertical deflection.
• With using the Castigliano no’s Theorem Method in calculate the bar deflection, it
easier if compared with other method.
• The result of deflection value is not far between experimental and theoretical.
59 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
8. Lab session 8
8.1 Objective:
To determine experimentally the deflection at two points on a simply-supported beam
carrying point loads and to check the results by Macaulay’s method.
8.2 Apparatus
• Beam deflection apparatus
• steel beam
• two dial test-indicators and stands
• micrometre
• rule
• two hangers
• Weights.
8.3 Summary of Theory:
Consider the simply-supported beam loaded as shown in fig.8.1.
W1 W2
A α C D B
RA b RB
x l
M XX = RA x − Wl (x − a ) − W2 (x − b) (I)
M XX = R A x − Wl (x − a ) (ii)
M XX = R A x (iii)
Eqn. (i) gives the bending moment at any section of the beam provided bracketed terms are
discarded when they become negative. For this reason, the bracketed terms are known as
the “Macaulay Ghost Terms”.
60 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
d2y
Since EI =M
dx 2
d2y
EI = R A x − W1 ( x − a ) − W2 ( x − b) (iv)
dx 2
In Macaulay’s method, the bracketed terms are intergraded as a whole. This is justified
since
x1 x1
( x − a)dx =
xx x2
( x − a)d ( x − a)
dy x2 W W2
EI = R A − ( x − a) 2 − ( x − b) 2 + A (v)
dx 2 2 2
x 3 W1 W2
EIy = R A − ( x − a) 3 − ( x − b) 3 + AX + B (vi)
6 6 6
By integrating the bracketed quantities as a whole, the constants A and B have the same
values for all values of x.
Put x = a in eqn. (v) and omit the term in (x-b) since it is then negative.
dy a 2 WI
Then, EI = RA − (a − a) 2 + A
dx 2 2
a2
= RA +A
2
Putting x = a
dy a2
EI = RA + A1
dx 2
61 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Since the two equations concern the slope dy/dx at the same point that the constants A and
A1 must be equal. Similarly, by putting x = b it may be shown that the constant is again A.
The actual values of the constants A and B are obtained from the boundary conditions, that
is, in eqn. (vi):
y = o when x = o and
y = o when x = 1
Y1 Y2
A α C D B
R1 b R2
l
Respectively from end A. Select two points Y1 and Y2 approximately in positions shown in
the figure and set up the dial gauges to bear at these points on the upper surface of the beam.
Zero the dial gauges with the hangers in position.
Apply suitable loads W1 and W2 at C and D respectively and note the deflections at Y1 and
Y2 as indicated by the dial gauges. Record the values of W1 and W2 and the corresponding
deflections at Y1 and Y2. Sketch the arrangement and indicate on the sketch the distances
a, b, and l. Also, the distances of points X and Y from end A.
Calculate the deflections at Y1 and Y2, using Macaulay’s method and compare the values
with the observed results.
62 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
• Integrate to obtain the slope equation and again to obtain the deflection equation and
again to obtain the deflection equation, adding the constants A and B respectively at
each stage. Integrate the ‘ghost’ terms as a whole.
• Calculate the constants A and B from the condition that the deflection y is zero at the
two values of x corresponding with the supports. Omit negative ‘ghost’ terms.
• To determine slope or deflection at a particular point on the beam substitute the
corresponding value of x in the appropriate expression and omit any ‘ghost’ term which
may become negative.
8.5 Observation & Calculations:
Table 14
Flexural rigidity EI =
By means of Macaulay’s method calculate the deflection at the points X and Y using the
appropriate values of x and tabulate the results, as follows:
Table 15
Observed Calculated
Point Load (N) Deflection Deflection
(mm) (mm)
1 0.23 0.65
63 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
2 0.50 0.95
8.6 Graph
0.9
0.8
Deflection (mm)
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
1.0 1.5 2.0
Load (N)
8.8 Comments
For better readings and instrumentation,
• More accurate gauges and deflection sensors should be installed so that proper
reading can be observed
• Zero-error of the gauges should be considered while taking readings, the observers
should stay away from the table on which beam system is resting because by
disturbing the table, the absolute readings change so it should be controlled.
• As the loads cause the beam top edge to be compressed, while the lower edge is
being stretched and is under tension which leads to the perfect deflection readings,
64 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
65 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
9. Lab session 9
9.1 Objective
To examine the Rockwell Hardness testing machine and perform the Rockwell hardness test.
9.2 Apparatus
• Rockwell hardness testing machine.
• Specimen of mild steel/ cast iron etc.
9.3 Theory
A large number of different definitions exist for the term “hardness”. Wear resistance,
deformation behaviour, tensile strength, as well as modulus of elasticity are, among
others, associated with the term “hardness”. Hardness testing is almost non-destructive
and serves in many cases for the determination of characteristic quantities or parameters
which can be used for distinguishing and describing materials. Hardness values give e.g.,
information about the mechanical properties (i.e., strength) of the material at low cost.
The most common uses for hardness tests are to verify the heat treatment of a part and
to determine if a material has the properties necessary for its intended use. Establishing
a correlation between the hardness result and the desired material property allows this,
making hardness tests very useful in industrial and R&D applications
The following five factors can be used to determine the correct hardness test for application.
66 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
An indenter used in hardness testing apparatus to penetrate hard metals and other
materials consists of a shank body having at its end a conical frustum with a cylindrical
recess extending axially from that end, and a cone of polycrystalline diamond bonded to
a hard metal rod which, in turn is bonded in the cylindrical recess concentrically with the
axis of the body.
The various Test Methods Classification may be subdivided into two classes:
67 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
FigureFigure
9. 1: Indenter
31
In bench Rockwell hardness testing systems, all can handle large parts, however the
Versitron can usually test large parts more quickly and accurately, when compared to
other bench testers which require external support stands or fixtures. The Indentron, on
the other hand, is much easier to use on small, awkward parts.
Selecting a Rockwell scale, the operator should select the scale that specifies the largest
load and smallest indenter possible to do the job without exceeding defined operating
conditions and accounting for conditions that influence the test result. These influencing
conditions include test specimens which are below the minimum thickness for the depth
of indentation
• Machine
• Operator
• Environment
• Sample prep.
• Calibration.
68 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
9.7 Deflections
Machine deflection caused by dirt, grease, burrs, and other sources is also a significant
contributor to machine errors. Most Rockwell-scale testers are unable to compensate for
deflection (or movement) under load. (The Newage Versitron is an exception.)
9.8 Anvils
An often overlooked source of error is the anvil. Rough gouged anvil surfaces, anvil
surfaces that have been inadvertently hardness tested, and anvil surfaces that are worn or
ground to a taper can all spell disaster. In conventional Rockwell testers. These surfaces
should be slapped together every few service visits to ensure that they are flat.
Table 16
Major Minor
Scale Name Indenter Load Load Applications
Regular Rockwell
Scales
69 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
70 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
D = ball diameter
d = impression diameter
F = load
HB = Brinell Result
2𝐹
𝐻𝑏 =
𝝅𝑫(√𝑫 − 𝒅)
The test parameters that must be monitored are the normal (applied) load and horizontal
displacement. It is also desirable to monitor cracking events using acoustic emission (AE)
and/or the horizontal (frictional) load to aid in the correlation of forces with inspection
of the scratch path.
71 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
The significant result derived from the scratch test is the critical load for scale failure.
This parameter is derived from visual inspection of the scratch track in conjunction with
the vertical and horizontal load traces
Failure of the oxide/coating during scratch testing may occur by one of a number of
mechanisms. The most important of these in terms of their relevance to spallation are
buckling and wedge failures and quantitative interpretation of scratch testing is limited
to the latter. The analysis, which applies to failure by initial wedge cracking in the surface
layer, requires that the critical load for failure is measured as a function of oxide/coating
thickness and residual stress. A straight line fit is used and the fracture stress is defined
as the intercept i.e. failure when the imposed stress is zero; the gradient of the line, a,
defines the relationship between the critical load in the scratch test and the imposed stress.
This can be represented analytically by the expression:-
Advantages
• The highest precision and accuracy are guaranteed by the digital measuring system.
• Automatic test, for hardness measurements on moulded parts, with complicated and
uneven shapes, and plate materials in all durometer and IRHD ranges.
• Operating mode Hysteresis (data logging in connection with PC), for observation of
the flow and recovery characteristics of a test object under load and after removing the
load.
• Plug-in system: The measuring devices will only be plugged into the pick-up bracket,
the measuring devices are identified automatically, and therefore there is no need to
adjust the measuring distance.
• Through a short recess time and easy operation and handling of this intelligent system,
results can be obtained quickly and reliably. There is no need to do any preselection.
• Temperature does not have any influences on the measuring devices, and therefore
there is no need to adjust the measuring distance.
• Measuring devices can be integrated into production lines, or automatic manufacturing
processes.
72 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
combinations of load and size of indenter but commonly ‘C’ scale is used and hardness
is presented as HRC. Here the indenter has a diamond cone at the tip and applied force
is of 150 kgf. Soft materials are often tested in ‘B’ scale with a 1.6mm dia. Steel
indenter at 60kgf.
73 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
10.2 Apparatus
• Propped cantilever beam apparatus
• Weights
• Dial gauge
• Vernier Calliper
• Specimen
• Hangers
• Spanner
• Resist loads
• Counter bending moment and shear forces.
• Connect the frame.
• Provide a uniform distribution of loads
10.4 Procedure
• Measure the width and depth of the beam with the help of scale to find the moment of
inertia of the beam.
• Set the apparatus and put the required hangers at different points.
• Measure the distances of each hanger from the reference end.
• Set the deflection dial gauge at zero after putting the hangers.
• Take the reading of deflection after putting the loads in the hangers.
• Repeat the process for different loads.
• Find the theoretical deflection and compare with the experimental values by showing
on a graph.
74 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Depth of beam = d = 10 mm
Moment of Inertia for rectangular metal bar = I = bd3 /12= 2083.3 𝑚𝑚4
𝑑2 𝑦
𝑀 = 𝐸𝐼
𝑑𝑥 2
𝑑𝑦 𝑅𝐴 𝑥 2 𝑊1 (𝑥 − 𝑎1 )2 𝑊2 (𝑥 − 𝑎2 )2
𝐸𝐼 = − − + 𝐶1
𝑑𝑥 2 2 2
𝑅𝐴 𝑥 3 𝑊1 (𝑥 − 𝑎1 )3 𝑊2 (𝑥 − 𝑎2 )3
𝐸𝐼(𝑦) = − − + 𝐶1 𝑥 + 𝐶2
6 6 6
75 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
M
x Ra Rb
16.26
50.05
63cm
𝑅𝐴 = 1.21𝑁
𝑀𝐴 = 2.15𝑁𝑚
𝑅𝐵 = 0.78𝑁
Macaulay’s Method:
so C1= 0
y = 0 so c2 = 0
y = 4.7mm
76 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
Table 17
W1 W2 δexp δth
1 1 1 2 4 4.7 14
3 2 3 5 7 7.3 4.2
4 4 3 7 5 5.3 5.6
5 6 3 9 3 3.25 7.6
6 6 5 11 6 6.9 13.04
77 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
10.6 Graph
Deflection Experimental (δexp)
Ex#10
Deflection Theoretical (δth)
8
6
Deflection (mm)
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Load (N)
𝑥1 + 𝑥2 + 𝑥3 + 𝑥4 + 𝑥5
𝑀𝑒𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 =
𝑛
4.7 + 5.55 + 7.3 + 5.3 + 3.25 + 6.9
𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 =
5
𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 = 6.6
𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝐷𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
(𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 − 𝑥1 )2 + (𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 − 𝑥2 )2 + (𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 − 𝑥3 )2 + (𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 − 𝑥4 )2 + (𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑔 − 𝑥5 )2
= √
𝑛−1
78 | P a g e
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, New Campus KSK
𝑆. 𝐷
(4.7 − 6.6)2 + (5.55 − 6.6)2 + (7.3 − 6.6)2 + (5.3 − 6.6)2 + (3.25 − 6.6)2 + (6.0 − 6.6)2
= √
6−1
𝑆. 𝐷 = 2.14
10.9 Comments
• The deflection of a cantilevered beam depends on four factors: load, length, material of
beam, and cross-sectional shape.
• If we move the load closer to support of cantilever beam if it's a point load then it reduce
the deflection.
• For cantilevered beams, the maximum deflection will occur when the load is located at
the free end of the beam.
• In a cantilever beam the maximum bending moment occurs at the fixed end. Moment
at the free end is 0 and maximum at the fixed end.
In cantilever beams, the maximum shear force occurs at the fixed end. In the free end,
there is zero shear force.
79 | P a g e