SC Files 1
SC Files 1
SC Files 1
SYLLABUS
3. ID.; ID.; DIRECT ASSAULT UNDER ARTICLE 148 OF THE REVISED PENAL
CODE; DISTINCTION BETWEEN ARTICLE 148 AND SEC. 87(C), PARAGRAPH 2 OF
THE JUDICIARY ACT OF 1948. — While section 87 (c), paragraph 2, of the
Judiciary Act (Republic Act 296) provides that the Justice of the Peace Court and
Municipal Court have original jurisdiction over cases of "Assault where the intent
to kill is not charged or evident upon trial", this does not include direct assaults
defined and penalized under Article 148 of the Revised Penal Code. "Assault
where the intent to kill is not charged or evident upon trial" apparently refers to
crimes against persons under Title Eight of the Code. Direct assaults defined
under Article 148, on the other hand, are crimes against public order falling
under Article Three of the Code. In direct assaults, the victim is a person in
authority or his agent, and the attack, employment of force or intimidation is
committed on the occasion of the performance of official duties or by reason of
such performance. Also punishable as direct assault is the employment of force
or intimidation without a public uprising for the attainment of any of the
purposes enumerated in defining the crimes of rebellion and sedition. The
principal object of Article 148 is to penalize the commission of acts against public
order as may be indicated by its classification in the Revised Penal Code.
4. ID.; ID.; ID.; OFFENSES UNDER SECTION 87 (c) OF THE JUDICIARY ACT;
CONCURRENT JURISDICTION OF COURTS OF FIRST INSTANCE AND INFERIOR
COURTS. — The jurisdiction of Municipal Courts and Justices of the Peace over
the specific offenses mentioned in section 87 (c) of the Judiciary Act is
concurrent with Court of First Instance when the penalty to be imposed exceeds
six months imprisonment or a fine or more than two hundred pesos.
5. ID.; ID.; ID.; ID.; RULE STATED. — When two or more courts have
concurrent jurisdiction, the first to validly acquire it takes it to the exclusion of
the other or the rest.