Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

SC Files 1

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

IRST DIVISION

[G.R. No. L-15344. May 30, 1960.]

JOSE R. VILLANUEVA, City Attorney of the City of Butuan, Petitioner, v.


THE HON. MONTANO A. ORTIZ, Judge of the Court of First Instance of
Agusan, ANTONIO MORDENO and MALAQUIAS FORTUN, Respondents.

City Attorney José R. Villanueva for Petitioner.

Marcos M. Calo, Francisco Ro. Cupin and Tranquilino O. Calo, Jr.


for Respondents.

SYLLABUS

1. COURTS; JURISDICTION IN CRIMINAL CASES DETERMINED BY THE


ALLEGATION IN COMPLAINT OR INFORMATION. — Settled is the rule that the
jurisdiction of courts in criminal cases is determined by the allegations of the
complaint or information.

2. ID.; ID.; INFORMATION CHARGING CRIMES OF DIRECT ASSAULT AND


DISTURBANCE OF PUBLIC ORDER. — The Revised Penal Code (Article 148)
imposes the penalty of imprisonment of prision correccional in it medium and
maximum periods and a fine not exceeding 1,000 pesos upon anyone who
commits the crime of direct assault when the offender lays hands upon a person
in authority. And Article 153 of the same Code imposes the penalty of arresto
mayor in its medium period to prision correccional in it minimum period and a
fine not exceeding 1,000 pesos for any serious disturbance in a public place,
office or establishment, or interruption or disturbance of public performances,
functions or gatherings or peaceful meetings. Each separate crime charged in the
information is, therefore, punishable with imprisonment of more than six months
and a fine of more than two hundred pesos. Consequently, they are, according to
section 44, paragraph (f) of the Judiciary Act of 1948 (Republic Act 296), within
the original jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance.

3. ID.; ID.; DIRECT ASSAULT UNDER ARTICLE 148 OF THE REVISED PENAL
CODE; DISTINCTION BETWEEN ARTICLE 148 AND SEC. 87(C), PARAGRAPH 2 OF
THE JUDICIARY ACT OF 1948. — While section 87 (c), paragraph 2, of the
Judiciary Act (Republic Act 296) provides that the Justice of the Peace Court and
Municipal Court have original jurisdiction over cases of "Assault where the intent
to kill is not charged or evident upon trial", this does not include direct assaults
defined and penalized under Article 148 of the Revised Penal Code. "Assault
where the intent to kill is not charged or evident upon trial" apparently refers to
crimes against persons under Title Eight of the Code. Direct assaults defined
under Article 148, on the other hand, are crimes against public order falling
under Article Three of the Code. In direct assaults, the victim is a person in
authority or his agent, and the attack, employment of force or intimidation is
committed on the occasion of the performance of official duties or by reason of
such performance. Also punishable as direct assault is the employment of force
or intimidation without a public uprising for the attainment of any of the
purposes enumerated in defining the crimes of rebellion and sedition. The
principal object of Article 148 is to penalize the commission of acts against public
order as may be indicated by its classification in the Revised Penal Code.

4. ID.; ID.; ID.; OFFENSES UNDER SECTION 87 (c) OF THE JUDICIARY ACT;
CONCURRENT JURISDICTION OF COURTS OF FIRST INSTANCE AND INFERIOR
COURTS. — The jurisdiction of Municipal Courts and Justices of the Peace over
the specific offenses mentioned in section 87 (c) of the Judiciary Act is
concurrent with Court of First Instance when the penalty to be imposed exceeds
six months imprisonment or a fine or more than two hundred pesos.

5. ID.; ID.; ID.; ID.; RULE STATED. — When two or more courts have
concurrent jurisdiction, the first to validly acquire it takes it to the exclusion of
the other or the rest.

6. CRIMINAL LAW; COMPLEX CRIME; ASSAULT UPON A PERSON IN AUTHORITY


WITH DISTURBANCE OF PUBLIC ORDER. — Where it is alleged in the information
that the accused by laying hands upon election inspectors and watchers in public
places had cause serious disturbance an interrupted or disturbed public
performances and functions, they are thus charged with the complex crime of
assault upon a person in authority with disturbance of public order.

You might also like