A.vamshi Mini Project 2
A.vamshi Mini Project 2
A.vamshi Mini Project 2
Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Mini Project for the award of the
degree of Bachelor of Technology in Civil Engineering.
Submitted by
A.VAMSHI 20645A0102
A.NIKHIL 20645A0104
A.RAJKUMAR 20645A0106
VAAGDEVI COLLEGE OF
ENGINEERING
(UGC Autonomous)
(Accredited by NAAC “A” Grade)
(Approved by AICTE, New Delhi and Affiliated to
JNTUH)
BOLLIKUNTA WARANGAL – 506005
JANUARY – 2023
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
A.VAMSHI 20645A0102
A.NIKHIL 20645A0104
A.RAJKUMAR 20645A0106
MD.WASIF UDDIN 20645A0163
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the MINI PROJECT for the
award of the degree of Bachelor of Technology in Civil Engineering of
Vaagdevi College of Engineering Bollikunta , Warangal – 506 005.
SIGNATURE SIGNATURE
MIRZA MUBASHIR AHMED Dr. G. DINESH KUMAR
SUPERVISOR HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT
We would like to express our gratitude to all the people behind the screen
who helped me to transform an idea into a real application. We would like
to express our heart-felt gratitude to our parents without whom we would
not have been privileged to achieve and fulfill our dreams. We are grateful
to our Principal, Dr. K. Prakash who mostly ably run the institution and
has had the major hand in enabling me to do our project. We profoundly
thank Dr . G. Dinesh kumar, Head of the Department of Civil
Engineering who has been an excellent guide and also a Great source of
inspiration to our work. We would like to thank our supervisor, Mirza
Mubashir Ahmed, Department of Civil Engineering, Vaagdevi College
of Engineering, for his technical guidance, constant encouragement and
support in carrying out our project at college. This satisfaction and
euphoria that accompany the successful completion of the task would be
great but incomplete without the mention of the people who made it
possible with their constant guidance and encouragement crowns all the
efforts with success. In this context, I would like to thank all the other staff
members, both teaching and nonteaching, who have extended their timely
help and eased my task.
A.VAMSHI 20645A0102
A.NIKHIL 20645A0104
A.RAJKUMAR 20645A0106
MD.WASIF UDDIN 20645A0163
ABSTRACT
In this study the seismic response of a ten storied reinforced concrete building is
analysed by displacement controlled pushover analysis. It is assumed to be located
in seismic zone 3. The building frame is simulated and analysed using the
structural analysis and design software SAP2000. In non-linear analysis, moment-
curvature relationship is used to model plastic hinge behaviour. Thus it was
developed for modelling the user defined hinges for beam and column sections.
Moment (M) and interactive P-M hinges were assigned to the both ends of beam
and column sections respectively.
The lateral forces were obtained as per IS 1893 (Part1):2002 and applied to the
building. Top node displacement is incremented step by step up to the limiting
displacement to obtain the pushover curve and the sequence of formation of plastic
hinges and failure of beams and columns were recorded. The analysis results
including the pushover curve and hinge formation are discussed. The maximum
base shear capacity was found to be higher than the design base shear and hinges
were formed in beams prior to columns.
5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1…………………………………………………………………………….6
1.1 INTRODUCTION TO MIDAS GEN
1.2 ADVANTAGES OF MIDAS SOFTWARE
CHAPTER 2…………………………………..………….…………………………….11
2.1 INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT
CHAPTER 3…………………………………………..………………………………..12
3.1 PROCEDURE.
3.2 PUSHOVER ANALYSIS
6
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
General
All the data are entered with the Dialog Box, Table Window, MGT Command Shell and Model
Window in Midas Gen. Using the Dialog Box, the data can be entered by both mouse and
keyboard. The keyboard is mainly used for the Table Window and MGT Command Shell, and
the mouse is mainly used for the Model Window.Midas Civil is a Finite Element Analysis software
developed by MIDAS Soft, used for bridge analysis and design. Midas Civil combines the powerful pre-
and post-processing features with an extremely fast solver, which makes bridge modeling and analysis
simple, quick, and effective.
In the Dialog Box, the following buttons are used to reflect or cancel the data entry in the model.
Reflect the data entry in the model and, at the same time, close thecorresponding
operation and the dialog box.
Reflect the current data entry in the model and continuously accept any
additional data entry and modification maintaining the dialog box active.
Cancel the current data entry and close the dialog box.
When shifting the focus from one data entry to another in a Dialog Box, use the Tab key on the
keyboard to move successively from one data field to the next, or directly specify data by placing
the mouse cursor over the desired data field.
7
Dialog box in the form of Dialog Bar Dialog Box
The Table Window is a Spread Sheet type window where all the data entry and design
results can be viewed at a glance. It allows the user to make any additional data entry
(or) modification.
MGT Command Shell is a unique modeling feature, which allows the user toenter data
by text type commands.
For more details concerning the applications, refer to the On-line Manual.
8
Elements table window
DATAINPUTCOMMANDS
For convenience , Midas Gen provides the following data entry options:
Where several numerical data are entered consecutively in a data field, these data
can be distinguished by a“,” (Comma) or a “ ”(Blank).
<Example>‘333,102,101’or‘333102101’
Position data, element sections and properties and other relevant data can be
entered by simple assignments in the Model Window.
Length or directional increments can be specified using the mouse by choosing
the relevant origin and ending points in the Model Window rather than typing
these data directly on the keyboard.
Where the same length is repeated, the entry can be simplified by
“Number of repetitions @length” instead of repeating the same number.
<Example>20,25,22.3,22.3,22.3,22.3,22.3,8820,25,5@22.3,88
The keyboard may be used to enter selected data directly. The related node
numbering or element numbering may be an arithmetic progression in series or
the progression may be incremental. Then, the data entry can be simplified by
“start number to (t) final number ”or “ start number to(t)final number by
increment”.
<Example>21,22, …,54,55, 56“21 to56”, “21 t56”
<Example> 35,40,45,50,55,60“35 to 60 by5”, “35 t60 by5”
9
Numbers and mathematical expressions can be used in combination. The
majority of the operators and parentheses applied in engineering computation
can be used.
<Example> 202PHI*20^2
<Example> 202PHI*20^2
) Close parenthesis –
Power of n
^ Ex.:23 =2 ^ 3
(^2square,^3cube)
+ Addition –
– Subtraction –
* Multiplication –
/ Division –
PI 3.141592653589793
SQRT Ex.: 2= SQRT (2)
SIN Sine Unit : Degree
COS Cosine Unit :Degree
TAN Tangent Unit : Degree
ASIN Arc Sine Ex.:sin-1(0.3) =ASIN (0.3)
ACOS Arc Cosine Ex.:cos-1(0.3) =ACOS (0.3)
ATAN Arc Tangent Ex.:tan-1(0.3) =ATAN(0.3)
EXP Exponential function Ex.:e0.3 =EXP (0.3)
SINH Hyperbolic Sine Ex.: sinh(1) =SINH(1)
COSH Hyperbolic Cosine Ex.: cosh(1) =COSH(1)
COTAN Cosine/Sine Ex.: cotan(1) =COTAN(1)
LN Natural Logarithm –
LOG Common Logarithm –
10
ADVANTAGES AND FEATURES OF MIDAS :
Midas Gen has been developed in Visual C++, an object-oriented programming language, in the
Windows environment. The program is remarkably fast and can be easily mastered for practical
applications. By using the elaborately designed GUI (Graphic User Interface) and the up-to-date
Graphic Display functions, a structural model can be verified at each step of formation and the
results can be directly set into document formats.
During the development process, midas Gen has been verified through numerous examples. Each
of the functions has been verified by comparing the results with theoretical values and output
from other similar programs. The program has been applied to over 5,000 projects and the
reliability and effectiveness have been established. Representative examples are in the
Verification Manual.
The latest theories form the bases for the finite element algorithm that determines the accuracy of
analysis results. Excellent results are achieved compared to other similar programs.
※ Highlights of usage -
1. Operators accept the mixed-use of capital and lower-case letters.
2. As the operators are similar to that of an engineering calculator, the hierarchy of
operations follows the rules of common mathematical operations.
11
PUSHOVER ANALYSIS OF RC BUILDING
CHAPTER 2 :
INTRODUCTION
EARTHQUAKE can cause greatest damages to humanity among all the natural hazards.
Since earthquake forces are unpredictable and random in nature, proper analysis of the
structures must be ensured to withstand such loads. The recent developments in the
performance based engineering design have brought the non-linear static (NSP) or
pushover analysis to the forefront. It has replaced the conventional analysis procedures
due to its simplicity and proved to be a useful and effective tool for assessing the real
strength of structures. Pushover analysis can be either force controlled or displacement
controlled. The pushover analysis can provide significant perception and understanding
about the weak links in the structure.
12
Overview :
Pushover analysis is one of the performance-based design methods, recently attracting
practicing structural engineers engaged in the field of seismic design. The objective of a
performance-based design is achieved after the user and the designer collectively select a target
performance for the structure in question. The engineer carries out the conventional design and
subsequently performs a pushover (elasto-plastic) analysis to evaluate if the selected
performance objective has been met.
CHAPTER 3 :
Procedure :
Modeling & Design -
- Details of Building
- Perform analysis
- Check assigned rebar date
Pushover Analysis -
- Pushover Global Control
- Pushover Load Cases
- Define Hinge Properties
- Assign Hinge Properties
- Perform Pushover Analysis
- Pushover Curve
- Pushover Hinge Status Results
- Safety Verification Table Details of the example structure
13
Figure 2. Cross section
Column Section :
Beam Section :
G1 21 350 x 650
14
Materials (Eurocode4:2004) :
Column: C30/37
Beam: C25/30
Wall: C30/37
Applied Loads:
Gravity loads
unit: kN/m2
Use : Residential
Load Name
Wind LoadDetails
4 XY (Y-direction in the global coordinates)
1 DL Dead Load
16
Step 2: Check assigned rebar data 1 4
5
2
1. Design > Design > RC Design > Modify Beam
Section Data
2. Check on the section ID 21.
3. Check rebar data for Beam.
4. Design > Design > RC Design > Modify
Column Section Data
5. Check on the section ID 101.
6. Check rebar data for column.
Design Code specified in the Concrete Design Code dialog is applied to calculate the capacity of
17
Step 4: Pushover Global Control
3
2
4
2
18
Step 5: Pushover Global Control
Tools -> Setting -> Preferences… -> Select Design in the General
19
Secondary Seismic Elements
In order to calculate the total chord rotation capacity at ultimate, θu, the factor ‘γel’ is used. Since γel
is differently applied for primary and secondary seismic element (γel = 1.5 for primary seismic
elements, γel = 1.0 for secondary seismic elements As per EN1998-3:2004 A.3.1.1), the user can
define Secondary Seismic Elements group. If Secondary Seismic Elements are not defined, all
9
20
8
10
11
12
13
CHAPTER 5
Step 8: Define Pushover Hinge Properties – Moment Hinge
Pushover > Assign > Assign Hinge Properties > Define Pushover
Hinge Properties
Click [Add] button.
Enter the pushover hinge properties name as ‘Beam’.
Check on ‘Fz’ & ‘My’ component.
Click [Apply] button.
21
In order to check or modify the hinge properties, click
[Properties…]button of the desired component. 3
22
2
23
2
6
3
M={As2*fsc*(d-d2)}+M’
Flexura Where,
l As2= area of compression steel M’=K’bd2fck
Hinge fsc=700(xu-d2)/xu ≤ fyd
d2=effective depth to compression steel xu=(δ-0.4)d
fyd=design yield strength of reinforcement
24
Shear strength of reinforcement, VRd,S is the smaller value of:
Shear
Hinge
Eurocode2:2004, Equation(6.2a) and (6.2b)
DY
Flexu Eurocode8-3:2004, Equation(A.10b)
ral
Hing DU
e Eurocode8-3:2004,
Equation(A.1)
25
2
3 4
Select column members from the Tree Menu. Pushover hinge properties can be simply assigned to the
selected
Drag and drop the ‘Column’ hinge property from the Tree Menu to elements
the Model by Drag
Window . & Drop.
1 Right-click
26
Step 13: Assign Pushover Hinge Properties for Walls
1 Right-click
27
Step 14: Perform 2pushover analysis
28
Step 12: Pushover Curve
29
CHAPTER 6
The user can also check hinge status results for each step by clicking on the step box and scroll or clicking on the pushov
For the detailed formula of the Target Displacement, refer to ‘ANNEX B DETERMINATION OF THE
TARGET DISPLACEMENT FOR NONLINEAR STATIC (PUSHOVER) ANALYSIS, EN 1998-1:2004’. The
target displacement, which is obtained from the above, corresponds to the seismic demand of the Limit State of Significan
4 30
Step 16: Safety Verification Table
Click ‘Safety Verification Table’ in the Task Pane.
Select ‘Show All Elements’.
Click [OK] button.
Select ‘Significant Damage (SD)’.
Check on ‘My’ and ‘Fz’.
Click [OK] button.
1
2
Safety Verification Table displays the comparison results between the demand and
capacities of the elements as per EN1998-3:2004 Table 4.3. Safety verification shall be
conducted of both ductile and brittle elements respectively. For ductile elements,
verification will be conducted in terms of deformation using mean values of properties
4 divided by CF. For brittle elements, verification shall be conducted in terms of strength
using mean values of properties divided by CF and by partial factor.
31
Capacity of RC structures for assessment in the Safety Verification Table
(Eurocode8-3:2004, Annex A.3.1)
32
For ductile elements, mean values of properties divided by CF are used.
For brittle members, mean values of properties divided by CF and by partial factor.
REFERENCE
1 SAP 2000 manual (Version 14), “CSI getting started with SAP2000”,
Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, USA.
2 ATC-40, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings”,
Applied Technology Council, California, Volume 1, 1996
3 ASCE 41-06(2007), “Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings”,
American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia, USA
4 FEMA 356, “Pre-standard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of
the Buildings”, Federal Emergency Management Agency & American
Society of Civil Engineers, November 2000.
5 Rohit,B., “Pushover Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frame”, M.tech thesis,
Thapar University, 2011
THE END
* * * * * * * * * * *
33
34