FM WK 5 Pmu
FM WK 5 Pmu
FM WK 5 Pmu
PARAG UDAS
Fast moving consumer goods (FMCG)
Inter sector & inter company analysis of financial statements of typical industrial sectors & 2 companies with in each sector
calcualte and analyse all ratio and du pont analysis. U are expcted to comapre the ratios of 2 companies within a sector nad also dra
HLL
Expenditure
Raw Material 5,931.39 5,748.45 5,398.23 4,533.42 4,652.62
Power & Fuel cost 123.14 139.95 152.77 166.41 167.84
Employee Cost 576.82 606.75 585.55 591.85 570.85
Other Manufacturing Expences 770.91 807.58 895.4 927.05 995.58
Selling & Admin Expences 1,389.43 1,458.12 1,646.75 1,553.47 1,558.92
Miscellaneous Expences 264.09 295.32 276.76 280.69 375.55
Total Expences 9,055.78 9,056.17 8,955.46 8,052.89 8,321.36
approx COGS 7,555.16 7,472.29 7,253.23 6,376.36 6,570.91
PBDIT 1,539.09 1,809.18 2,196.13 2,378.82 2,403.94
Interest 22.39 13.15 7.74 9.18 66.76
PBDT 1,516.70 1,796.03 2,188.39 2,369.64 2,337.18
Depreciation 128.76 130.94 144.66 134.1 124.78
Profit Before Tax 1,387.94 1,665.09 2,043.73 2,235.54 2,212.40
Extre-ordinary items 3.8 17.24 -1.01 56.13 0
PBT (Post Extra-ord items) 1,384.14 1,647.85 2,044.74 2,179.41 2,212.40
Tax 318 355 402.42 465.8 440.61
Net Profit 1,069.94 1,310.09 1,641.31 1,769.74 1,771.79
10% 12% 14% 16% 16%
Equity Dividend 638.18 770.21 1100.62 1210.69 1599.2
Corporate Divident Tax 72.92 172.15 57.69 0 374.14
Balance Sheet
Rs Cr
Efficiency Ratios
Avg collection period 7.82 8.49 13.19 12.29 15.51
= avg receivables outstanding/avg daily
Sales
Number of days sales in inventories= 63.29 57.74 62.40 73.20 77.36
avg inventory/avg daily cost of goods sold.
Here COGS is calcualted by taking 50% cost
for indirect labours
Debtors turnover ratio = 46.65 42.99 27.67 29.71 23.54
365/no. of days sales in Receivables
Inventory turnover ratio = 5.77 6.32 5.85 4.99 4.72
365/no. of days sales in inventory
Fixed asset turnover 11.09 10.59 9.72 8.99 8.55
=Sales /avg fixed asset.-net block
Total assets turnover ratio 8.56 13.70 7.88 8.08 8.74
LEVERAGE RATIO
PROFITABILITY
Operating Profit Margin = 15% 17% 21% 24% 24%
PBDIT / Net Sales
Net Profit Margin = 11% 12% 15% 18% 18%
PAT / Net Sales
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) = 62% 65% 66% 60% 59%
PBIT / CE=Capital employed=share holder's
equity+debt
Return on equity= 51% 53% 54% 48% 83%
net income/stock holder's equity
VALUATION
EPS=Earing per share= 48.73 59.67 74.75 80.60 80.69
PAT/No of shares(CONSIDER Rs.10 face
value of share
Cash EPS= 54.59 65.48 81.14 86.49 86.16
(PAT+Depn)/No. of eq.shares
Dividend payout= 60% 59% 67% 68% 90%
Dividend/PAT
Dividend per share= 29.06 35.00 50.00 55.00 72.65
dividend / no of share
Book Value per Share = 95.77 113.07 138.27 166.22 97.16
Net Worth / No of Shares
Price-earning ratio= 3.96 3.23 2.58 2.39 2.39
market value of shares/net income
market value of shares/earnings per share
Price to Book Ratio 2.02 1.71 1.40 1.16 1.99
This is an index of Wealth Creation or Wealth
Destruction
Price to Sales= 0.42 0.40 0.40 0.43 0.42
Price/ sales per share
Comments
1 FMCG sector is very competitive sector & also not much fast growing sector. In these sector HLL & P&G is big player
HLL is in this sector from long time & P&G has come after HLL.
2 1.P & G is stronger than HLL liquidity front. Very low debtor turnover in days for P & G means company is trying to ke
the CL at low levels. Earlier P& G was having very high debtor turnover in days. P & G & HLL is having avg inventory
turnover of 4 to 6 days. P&G is cash rich than HLL. It could be asking discounts on early payments to vendors.
2. The industry is growing very slowly. The sales figures of two of the major players in the sector are almost flat at only
0.41% and 0.39%.
3. All solvency ratios are very healthy for both companies for the first 4 years. In fact P & G is a debt free company.
Initially HLL was also a debt free company but HLL has increased the borrowings substantially in year 2002. Both
companies are having very good interest coverage ratio. DCSR shows that both companies were having good debt
coverage ratio specially in 2001 & 2002 years.
4.The profitability ratios indicate that P & G is in a position to charge higher margins and is constantly improving it. In 3
years time it has improved OPM by 50% and NPM also by 33%. HLL is unable to meet the challenge initially but later it
picked up.. Basically HLL looks like catering to lower end (mass market) of market and P & G is catering to premium
segment. This is also confirmed by the sales volume.
5. The HLL success is because of high volumes which it is generating with employed capital. In case of P & G if this
efficiency of capital is improved its' RONW could jump with the same margins. The growth and profits could be
phenomenon. Both companies are having very good ROE ratio.
6. The gap between OPM and NPM for both companies is not so much wide but it can be bridged by adopting some
sound financial management and reducing depreciation, tax and interest burden.
7. the market capitalization of HLL & P&G has almost constant in all periods.
8) Due to high net profit ( due to high sale), HLL is having more earning per share as no of equity share is very high as
compared to P & G.
9) HLL is having low PE as compared to P&G (assuming market price is 200 for both ), may be due to creditability or d
to fluctuate in cycle.
10) P& G has paid very high dividend in 1999 & 2001. But in overall HLL is paying dividend in increasing trend & every
shareholders are getting more money in very year as compared to P&G . Due to this HLL's retained earning is very les
as compared to P&G.
11) Market is giving more or less same values as per individual book value to both companies.
12) Price to sales ratio indicates that HLL is cheaper than P&G.
ach sector
Expenditure
Raw Material 165.92 170.1 172.44 163.31 183.15
Power & Fuel cost 5.07 5.63 5.7 5.39 4.28
Employee Cost 38.48 30.67 36.81 33.52 34.3
Other Manufacturing Expences 20.12 19.86 16.87 19.49 16.66
Selling & Admin Expences 81.22 86.2 69.47 81.25 97.07
Miscellaneous Expences 16.66 11.63 6.47 3.89 13.41
Total Expences 327.47 324.09 307.76 306.85 348.87
Efficiency Ratios
Avg collection period 4.64 15.92 28.65 19.41 32.11
= avg receivables outstanding/avg daily
Sales
Number of days sales in inventories= 68.83 65.81 59.04 51.24 50.70
avg inventory/avg daily cost of goods sold.
Here COGS is calcualted by taking 50% cost
for indirect labours
Debtors turnover ratio = 78.70 22.93 12.74 18.80 11.37
365/no. of days sales in Receivables
Inventory turnover ratio = 5.30 5.55 6.18 7.12 7.20
365/no. of days sales in inventory
Fixed asset turnover 2.95 3.48 3.89 4.22 6.40
=Sales /avg fixed asset.
Total assets turnover ratio 2.97 2.45 2.53 2.06 2.06
sales/ asset
Cash (No of Days) = 32.14 52.34 43.56 58.98 105.17
Cash / Sales per Day
LEVERAGE RATIO
PROFITABILITY
Operating Profit Margin = 23% 28% 32% 30% 24%
PBDIT / Net Sales
Net Profit Margin = 14% 18% 20% 19% 16%
PAT / Net Sales
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) = 42% 45% 56% 47% 40%
PBIT / CE=Capital employed=share holder's
equity+debt
Return on equity= 41% 38% 45% 35% 30%
net income/stock holder's equity
VALUATION
EPS=Earing per share= 26.28 34.67 38.21 35.59 31.44
PAT/No of shares(CONSIDER Rs.10 face
value of share
Cash EPS= 36.93 46.02 51.77 44.67 37.48
(PAT+Depn)/No. of eq.shares
Dividend payout= 152% 22% 105% 56% 64%
Dividend/PAT
Dividend per share= 40 7.5 40 20 20
dividend / no of share
Book Value per Share = 64.76 91.10 84.94 100.67 106.45
Net Worth / No of Shares
Price-earning ratio= 27.06 20.51 18.61 19.98 22.61
market value of shares/net income
market value of shares/earnings per share
Price to Book Ratio 10.98 7.80 8.37 7.06 6.68
This is an index of Wealth Creation or
Wealth Destruction
Price to Sales= 3.82 3.65 3.77 3.76 3.51
Price/ sales per share
ree company.
ar 2002. Both
ving good debt
improving it. In 3
initially but later it
ing to premium
of P & G if this
could be
adopting some
o creditability or due
Ranbaxy
Expenditure
Raw Material 822.84 886.49 1,029.95 1,301.03
Power & Fuel cost 38.35 50.12 45.86 51.65
Employee Cost 91.1 135.59 135.85 183.16
Other Manufacturing Expences 33.12 40.88 61.09 68.97
Selling & Admin Expences 305.36 319.14 474.21 742.92
Miscellaneous Expences 68.88 44.77 83.44 98.61
Total Expences 1,359.65 1,476.99 1,830.40 2,446.34
Application of Funds
Gross block 779.79 837.22 918.45 1027.71
Less: Accum. Depreciation 237.37 280.85 314.78 369.49
Net Block 542.42 556.37 603.67 658.22
Capital work in Progress 89.48 88 9.38 17.17
Efficiency Ratios
Avg collection period
= avg receivables outstanding/avg daily 106.97 85.66 88.15 84.96
Sales
Number of days sales in inventories= 119.20 126.25 115.47 117.41
avg inventory/avg daily cost of goods sold.
Here COGS is calcualted by taking 50% cost
for indirect labours
Debtors turnover ratio = 3.41 4.26 4.14 4.30
365/no. of days sales in Receivables
Inventory turnover ratio = 3.06 2.89 3.16 3.11
365/no. of days sales in inventory
Fixed asset turnover 3.02 3.15 3.54 4.59
=Sales /avg fixed asset.
Total assets turnover ratio 1.12 1.23 1.68 2.38
LEVERAGE RATIO
PROFITABILITY
Operating Profit Margin = 22% 19% 18% 27%
PBDIT / Net Sales
Net Profit Margin = 13% 11% 12% 21%
PAT / Net Sales
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE) = 16% 14% 19% 39%
PBIT / CE=Capital employed=share holder's
equity+debt
Return on equity= 13% 12% 16% 33%
net income/stock holder's equity
VALUATION
EPS=Earing per share= 16.99 15.74 21.74 33.63
PAT/No of shares(CONSIDER Rs.10 face
value of share
Cash EPS= 20.94 20.07 25.98 36.23
(PAT+Depn)/No. of eq.shares
Dividend payout= 44% 48% 46% 39%
Dividend/PAT
Dividend per share= 7.50 7.50 10.00 13.12
dividend / no of share
Book Value per Share = 129.24 136.55 138.24 100.92
Net Worth / No of Shares
Price-earning ratio= 25.84 27.89 20.19 13.06
market value of shares/net income
market value of shares/earnings per share
Price to Book Ratio 3.40 3.21 3.18 4.35
This is an index of Wealth Creation or Wealth
Destruction
Price to Sales= 3.11 2.90 2.38 2.70
Price/ sales per share
Plz note market price is as on date 5-11-2007 at 2.45pm
Comments
In pharma Ranbaxy & Glaxo is a major player. Pharma needs extensive R&D facility & much of the money is
spent on it. Analysis of the ratio for these 2 major player is as under
1 Liquidity ratio
Current ratio for Ranbaxy has declined & same for Glaxoc except 01-02.. Ranbxy's asset utilisation is much better than of Glaxo
2 DuPONT
Profitability of glaxo has gone donw. This is due to low return on sales
Asset turn over for Ranbaxu is increaseing whereas Galxo is in decreasing trend.
Leverage : Ranbaxy is more effective in leveraging stock holder money as compared to Glaxo
Overall fro this Ranbaxy is perfmoring well.
3 Glaxo is manaing well on out stading receivables as comapred to Ranbaxy.Inventory is also very less. This is due to the less sa
to ranbaxy. Ranbaxy is perfomring well as it has decreased the inventory slisghlty which may be the requirement for ranbxy & ou
4 DSCR for Glaxo is very good. This is due to less debt. But also this means that Glaxo is not a agrresive in the mkt now a days
As told Pharma companies needs to put lot of money for R&D this what Ranbaxy is doing.Mainly galxo is not in the drug R&D b
5 The profitability ratios indicate that Ranbaxy is in a position to charge higher margins and is constantly improving it. In
3 years time it has improved OPM by 27% and NPM also by 70%. Glaxo initially was good but unable to meet the
challenge & droped down Basically Ranbaxy is looking for patented drugs & Glaxo is for mainly for babys foods This
is also confirmed by the sales volume.
6 The Ranbaxy success is because of high volumes which it is generating with employed capital. In case of Glaxo if this
efficiency of capital is improved its' RONW could jump with the same margins. The growth and profits could be
phenomenon. Ranbaxy companies is having very good ROE ratio but glaxo is not good.
7 Valuation wise since Galxo is MNC company & has got good value for the brand & due to high market capitalisation, Galxo is be
Glaxo
Rs Cr Rs Cr
Rs Cr Rs Cr
Dec-03 Dec-99 Dec-00 Dec-01 Dec-02 Dec-03
21% 11% 9% 8% 4% 9%
22% 12% 9% 8% 4% 9%
of the money is
sation is much better than of Glaxo
% as compared to FMCG which is 24% NPM is also 16% for FMCG & 125 for
Glaxo
Expenditure
Raw Material 399.98 478.60 493.11 520.99 513.47
Power & Fuel cost 19.87 21.97 24.76 21.8 20.6
Employee Cost 71.94 83.33 103.62 225.61 160.68
Other Manufacturing Expences 40.5 45.76 37.99 32.21 36.42
Selling & Admin Expences 56.17 76.71 97.01 126.67 127.71
Miscellaneous Expences 36.88 34.47 44.2 92.68 82.89
Total Expences 625.34 740.84 800.69 1,019.96 941.77
Application of Funds
Gross block 215.42 239.99 254.8 306.17 270.08
Less: Accum. Depreciation 131.87 143.9 158.46 184.45 159.83
Net Block 83.55 96.09 96.34 121.72 110.25
Capital work in Progress 8.81 8.47 5.03 15.9 5.15
Expenditure
Raw Material 165.92 170.10 172.44 163.31 183.15
Power & Fuel cost 5.07 5.63 5.7 5.39 4.28
Employee Cost 38.48 30.67 36.81 33.52 34.3
Other Manufacturing Expences 20.12 19.86 16.87 19.49 16.66
Selling & Admin Expences 81.22 86.20 69.47 81.25 97.07
Miscellaneous Expences 16.66 11.63 6.47 3.89 13.41
Total Expences 327.47 324.09 307.76 306.85 348.87
Application of Funds
Gross block 233.93 229.09 215.14 221.53 167.49
Less: Accum. Depreciation 74.95 92.56 99.82 114.86 93.18
Net Block 158.98 136.53 115.32 106.67 74.31
Capital work in Progress 7.39 11.69 9.08 0 2.22