Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 48 views

    Critique Paper Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Nickole Dianne Lura
    The document provides a rubric for critiquing papers with criteria in several areas and point values for levels of achievement in each area. The areas include introduction and conclusion, main points, organization, style, and mechanics. For each area, it describes the characteristics of a response that would earn the highest number of points down to the lowest number of points.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Critique Paper Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Nickole Dianne Lura
    48 views2 pages
    The document provides a rubric for critiquing papers with criteria in several areas and point values for levels of achievement in each area. The areas include introduction and conclusion, main points, organization, style, and mechanics. For each area, it describes the characteristics of a response that would earn the highest number of points down to the lowest number of points.

    Original Description:

    Grgms Fnatjwtjwtnaaannwmejek3o372u35n52bn

    Original Title

    CRITIQUE-PAPER-RUBRIC

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides a rubric for critiquing papers with criteria in several areas and point values for levels of achievement in each area. The areas include introduction and conclusion, main points, organization, style, and mechanics. For each area, it describes the characteristics of a response that would earn the highest number of points down to the lowest number of points.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    48 views2 pages

    Critique Paper Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Nickole Dianne Lura
    The document provides a rubric for critiquing papers with criteria in several areas and point values for levels of achievement in each area. The areas include introduction and conclusion, main points, organization, style, and mechanics. For each area, it describes the characteristics of a response that would earn the highest number of points down to the lowest number of points.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    CRITIQUE PAPER

    4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point

    There is a well-developed introduction Introduction creates interest. Introduction adequately Background details are a random,
    with an attention grabber that grabs the Thesis states the position. explains the background but unclear collection of information.
    reader’s interest and continues to engage Conclusion effectively may lack detail. Thesis states Thesis is vague and unclear.
    INTRODUCTION and the reader up until the thesis statement. summarizes the topic. the topic, but key elements are Conclusion is not effective and
    CONCLUSION The thesis statement should clearly state missing does not summarize main points.
    (Background the experience or event that will be
    History/Thesis Statement) described as well as the effect on the
    writer. Conclusion should effectively
    wrap up and re stresses the importance of
    the thesis.

    Well-developed main points/topic Three or more main points Three or more main points are Less than three ideas/main points
    sentences that relate directly to the relate to the thesis, but some present, but lack details in are explained and/or they are
    MAIN POINTS (Body thesis. Supporting examples are concrete may lack details. The analysis describing the event. Little poorly developed. The story tells; it
    Paragraphs) and detailed. The analysis is developed shows events from the author’s descriptive language is used. doesn’t show
    with an effective point of view. point of view but could use
    more descriptive language.

    Logical Progression of ideas with a clear Logical progression of ideas. Organization is clear. Writing is not organized. The
    structure that enhances the thesis. Transitions are present Transitions are present at times, transitions between ideas are
    ORGANIZATION (Structure
    Transitions are effective and vary throughout the essay but lacks but there is very little variety. unclear or non-existent.
    and Transitions)
    throughout the paragraph, not just in the variety.
    topic sentences.

    Writing is smooth, skillful, and coherent. Writing is clear and sentences Writing is clear but could use a Writing is confusing and hard to
    STYLE (Sentence Flow, Sentences are strong and expressive with have varied structure, Diction is little more sentence variety to follow. Contains fragments and/or
    Variety, Diction) varied structure. Diction is consistent and consistent. make the writing more run-on sentences.
    words are well chosen. interesting.
    Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization Punctuation, spelling, and There are only a few (3- 4) errors Distracting errors in punctuation,
    MECHANICS (Spelling,
    are all correct. No errors. capitalization are generally in punctuation, spelling, and spelling, and capitalization.
    Punctuation, Capitalization)
    correct with few errors (1-2) capitalization.

    You might also like