Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

TOPIC: Charter of 1753 Previous Year Question

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

LECTURE 3

TOPIC : Charter of 1753

PREVIOUS YEAR QUESTION


 No such question

BE PREPARED WITH a LONG NOTE OR SHORT NOTES ON


TODAY’S TOPIC.........i.e., Reasons, Provisions and
Limitations of Charter of 1753.

FILLING THE TIME GAP IN HISTORY


After 1661 Charter, recall few years..........
1666 Madras made Presidency
1669 Bombay
1683 Charter of Charles II empowered Company to establish Admiralty
Court and Mayor’s Court at Madras
1687 Mayor’s Court established at Madras via Charter of Company
1690 Calcutta

1726 Charter of George I which marked the beginning


of a new phase in the EVOLUTION OF JUDICIAL
INSTITUTIONS IN INDIA.
It provided for :
1. ESTABLISHMENT OF CORPORATIONS AT BOMBAY AND
CALCUTTA
2. MAYOR’S COURT IN PRESIDENCIES
PERIOD FROM 1726 to 1753 was of working of Mayor’s
Court. It was full of conflicts and disputes between
Governor & Council on one side and Corporation and
Mayor’s Court on the other.

Reasons for these clashes

i. Lack of adequate judicial training and discipline among judges of Courts.


ii. Attitude of Governor and Council to treat Mayor’s Court as subordinate.
iii. Both Governor and Mayor’s Court suffered from superiority complex and
considered themselves independent and not complementary.
iv. Uncertainties and ambiguities of Charter of 1726 like who had real authority
to interpret provisions of Charter.

All these reasons for conflicts became the REASONS


FOR CHARTER OF 1753.

CHARTER OF 1753
REASONS FOR ISSUING NEW CHARTER
1. To amend the Charter of 1726
2. To solve chaotic conditions in Presidencies
3. To revive the institution of Mayor’s Court in Madras.........why ???
4. Company requested the King 1746 : French occupies Madras
1749 : Britishers got it back

3 years... Functioning ceased


S.No. PROVISIONS CONTENT

1. Issuing Authority King George II


2. Mayor’s Court  They were revived with modifications
 Madras Mayor’s Court was revived
 The jurisdiction of all Presidencies was modified
3. Mayor’s Court  Mode of appointment of Mayor and Aldermen was changed.
became How...???... Governor and Council now have to select 1 name out of 2
subordinate to
 Council got full power to appoint and dismiss Aldermen
Governor and
Council
4. Native Laws for  Civil cases of natives based on customs and usages
natives  Mayor’s Court can hear the Indian cases only if both native
Indian parties agreed and submitted the case to it.
5. New Court  COURT OF REQUEST in each Presidency to decide cases
established upto 5 Pagodas.
 Provide cheap and quick justice to those who cannot afford it.
 Juristiction was over all natives including Indians.
6. Other provisions  Change in Oath System
 Court fee submitted by litigants was now to be deposited to the
government instead of Courts

JUDICIAL ARRANGEMENT UNDER THE CHARTER OF 1753

4 COURTS
Court of Request Mayor’s Court Governor and Council King-in-Council
1. Petty civil cases Civil cases EXCLUSIVE jurisdiction
over criminal cases In England
2. Upto 5 Pagodas Exceeding 5 Pagodas Act as Justice of Peace

3. Jurisdiction over all Over native cases, Held Quarterly Sessions Hear appeals from
natives only if both parties (4 times a year) Court of Governor &
agree Council in ALL CIVIL
These cases could not Also hear cases Hear appeals from Mayor’s CASES involving sum
4. of 1000 Pagodas or
be tried by Mayor’s against Governor, Court
Court Aldermen or more.
Company
LIMITATIONS OF THE CHARTER OF 1753

1. Independence of Mayor’s Court was compromised when one of the party to


the suit was Company.
2. Partisan view of Mayor’s Court when there was a case between sevants of
Company and Natives, regarding private trade.
3. All 3 organs of government centralised in 1 authority, i.e., Governor &
Council.
4. Judges of Mayor’s Court were laymen.
5. Delay in disposing off cases, when there were complicated cases.
6. Exclusion of Indians in sharing administration of justice.
7. Territorial jurisdiction of all courts was limited to Presidencies, but
activities had extended beyond it.

......... This system went on till.........


1774 in Calcutta : Mayor’s Court replaced by SC of
Judicatue
1798 in Bombay and Madras : Replacement was done by
Recorder’s Court

You might also like