Company Law 2017
Company Law 2017
Company Law 2017
18. Mohan, who was appointed as an additional director at the Board Meeting held on 15th
June, 2014 continues to be in his office on the ground that the Annual General Meeting for
the financial year 2013-2014 was not held as required under the Companies Act, 2013.
Whether continuance of Mohan in the office is valid? Will your answer be different if
Mohan was also Managing Director for a period of five years with effect from 1st June,
2014 at the same Board Meeting?
19. The Secretary of a company issues a share certificate in favour of Mr. Cook which
apparently complied with the company’s articles as it is purported to be signed by two
directors and the secretary, and it had the company’s seal affixed to it. In fact, the secretary
had forged the signatures of the directors and affixed the seal without authority. Is the
certificate binding on the company?
20. A company issued a prospectus advertising that the company has a great “potential
turnover” of a million bags of cement in a year. It is discovered later that while the company
did have the installed capacity of one million bags, it had never produced more than 6 lakh
bags of cement in a year. Buyers of the shares seek remedy against the misleading
statement. Will they succeed?
21. 40%of the paid up share capital of a company A is held by the Central Government, 11%
by public institutions like the Life Insurance Corporation of India and the Unit Trust of
India. Is A a government company?
Roll No: ---------------------------
18. Amol, a non-member of Shethi Ltd., has been appointed as a director of the company. Later
on, he has become the chairman of the company. In an Annual General Meeting of Shethi
Ltd., Amol presided over the meeting. Zahir, a member of the company, objected to his
chairmanship on the ground that Amol is not a member of the company. Discuss the
validity of the objection.
19. The Articles of a company empowered the directors to determine who should have the
authority to draw bills on behalf of the company. ‘C’, the manager of a branch of the
company, drew bills on behalf of the company in favour of ‘K’, who took them in good
faith believing that ‘C’ was authorized to draw them. In fact, ‘C’ had no such authority. Is
the company liable on the said bill? Will it make any difference if ‘C’ had been a director
of the company?
20. The main object of a company is to manufacture steel and steel related products. Seeing
the potential for new business the Board of Directors decided to go in for manufacture of
cement. These are included in the ‘other objects’ of the company. Can the company
undertake the aforesaid new business? Discuss.
21. An allottee of shares in the company has brought an action against Director Q in the
company in respect of false statements in the prospectus. The Director has contended that
the statements were prepared by promoters and he relied on them. Is the director liable
under the circumstances?