Sound Absorption Characterisation of Woven Materials. Case Study: Auditorium Restoration
Sound Absorption Characterisation of Woven Materials. Case Study: Auditorium Restoration
Sound Absorption Characterisation of Woven Materials. Case Study: Auditorium Restoration
ABSTRACT
Nowadays building conservation and refurbishment draw the attention of the world we live in. In particular, in the
public sector, the change of occupancy is commonly used in order to maintain the existing functional layout of spaces
and the original structure of the building. Further improvements need to be also considered in order to save the indoor
environmental quality. A case study is provided below by the analysis of acoustical performances of an auditorium in
Italy, the historical S. Giorgio Palace in Genoa. The palace was built in 1260 and it was the most important public
palace in the town; afterwards it became the headquarters of the Port Authority in 1903. Although the high reflective
materials covering the interior surfaces provide high values of reverberation time, the hall is mainly used as a
conference hall. The acoustical project of restoration, approved by the Ministry of Italian Cultural Heritage, allows
only the application of woven materials for floor and curtains, which can be easily removed in case of a change of
destination to respect the historical and architectural value of the hall. Acoustical measurements, by means of the
impedance tube, have been performed up to now in order to define the best woven materials to improve the overall
acoustic performances of the hall. The normal incidence sound absorption coefficient of different samples of carpet
have been tested. A procedure for the samples location in impedance tube measurements has been outlined. Carpet is
a textile material with a good sound absorption, mainly at high frequencies. In order to improve its acoustic properties
at low frequencies a multilayer system composed of carpet and felt having different characteristics have been
experimentally investigated and the optimal configuration has been defined. .
ICA 2010 1
23-27 August 2010, Sydney, Australia Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 2010
2.1. Experimental campaign of Sala delle Compere while there is a great difference in the frequency domain. For
example Reverberation Time T20 reaches a minimum value
Through experimental measurements, carried out in of 1 s at 16000 Hz and a maximum value of 6 s at 63 Hz. In
accordance with ISO 3382 [2], the acoustic behavior of the the frequency domain more interesting for speaking, between
hall has been determined. In order to understand the spatial 125 to 4000 Hz, the medium reverberation time is above 5
distribution of the acoustical parameters, 9 receiver positions seconds, while in environments for listening comprehension,
have been investigated (figure 3). The experimental results of the optimal reverberation time should be around 1 s [7]. Also
T20, D50 and C50 as a function of frequency for all the 9 C50 and D 50 do not have a significant spatial variance,
positions are reported respectively in figure 4, 5 and 6. especially at medium frequencies. But their values are not
suitable for a conference hall: D50 at medium frequencies is
around 10% while optimal values should be above 50%; .C50
varies from -14 dB up to + 4 dB, only at 16000 Hz, while
optimal values should be above 3 dB.
6.00
In order to investigate the efficacy of the identified project
numerical simulations with RAMSETE pyramid tracing
5.00
software have been carried out. The tridimensional model
used for the simulation is presented in figure 7.
T20 [s]
4.00
3.00
2.00
1.00
0.00
63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000
Frequenza [Hz]
70.00
60.00
50.00
D50 [%]
40.00
30.00
Figure 7. Tridimensional model used for numerical
20.00
simulation
10.00
0.00
The absorption coefficient used for numerical simulations are
63 125 250 500 1000
Frequenza [Hz]
2000 4000 8000 16000
reported in table one. Data were collected by literature [7].
P.1 P.2 P.3 P.4 P.5 P.6 P.7 P.8 P.9 The materials with the star (*) are the ones used to simulate
Figure 5. D50 versus frequency in the 9 positions the acoustic behaviour of the hall after restoration.
-5.00
250 500 1000 2000 4000
-10.00 Plaster
(2 m) 205.31 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.06
-15.00
Marble 50.78 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Wood 36.24 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.15 0.10
-20.00
Frequenza [Hz] Gypsum 593.11 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05
P.1 P.2 P.3 P.4 P.5 P.6 P.7 P.8 P.9 Glass 80.17 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02
Figure 6. C50 versus frequency in the 9 positions Carpet* 484.15 0.10 0.30 0.50 0.65 0.70
Curtains* 83.65 0.15 0.35 0.40 0.50 0.50
Acoustic
There is not a significant variation of the acoustical Plaster * 889.81 0.08 0.15 0.29 0.29 0.33
parameters, T20, C50 and D50 among the 9 receiver position,
2 ICA 2010
23-27 August 2010, Sydney, Australia Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 2010
ICA 2010 3
23-27 August 2010, Sydney, Australia Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 2010
3.1. Carpet
3.2 Felt
4 ICA 2010
23-27 August 2010, Sydney, Australia Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 2010
ICA 2010 5
23-27 August 2010, Sydney, Australia Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 2010
6 ICA 2010
23-27 August 2010, Sydney, Australia Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 2010
ICA 2010 7
23-27 August 2010, Sydney, Australia Proceedings of 20th International Congress on Acoustics, ICA 2010
8 ICA 2010