Readiness of Transit Oriented Developmen
Readiness of Transit Oriented Developmen
Readiness of Transit Oriented Developmen
1
PLANMalaysia (Department of Town and Country Planning)
MINISTRY OF HOUSING AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
2,3
Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA
Abstract
1
Deputy Director at PLANMalaysia. Email: sabri@planmalaysia.gov.my
Sabri Ahmad, Mohamad Fadhli Rashid & Robiah Suratman
Readiness of Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Concept Implementation in Perak’s Suburban Areas
INTRODUCTION
Transit-oriented development (TOD) is a development concept which focuses on
human residential areas and activities that are located around transportation nodes
such as railway stations, motorized stations, and air and water transport.
Transportation network is a main pillar in the development of TOD, where it
eases the movement of people to travel to other places. Based on several research
conducted in big cities such as Doha, Copenhagen, and Perth, TOD can help to
solve many problems caused by rapid development such as traffic congestion,
land usage, population density, and usage of motorized vehicles (Al-Harami and
Raffaello, 2019; Furlan and Saeed, 2019).
In Malaysia, the concept of TOD has been applied in several areas,
especially by the Majlis Bandaraya Petaling Jaya (MBPJ) and Iskandar Regional
Development Authority (IRDA) using the Local Plan and Master Plan (Abdullah
et al., 2020). However, in suburban areas, the concept of TOD was not the main
vision for their future development (Azmi et al., 2021). This situation can change
completely according to Gomez et al (2019) if the local authority plans for future
development based on four elements of TOD, which are density, potential of land
use development, economic development, and transit system. The Perak State
Structured Plan highlighted a proposal for TOD around the railway stations in
Ipoh, Taiping, Tapah, Tanjong Malim, Batu Gajah, and Kampar
(PLANMalaysia@Perak, 2020). However, only Ipoh is considered to be ready
for TOD implementation due to its status as a City Council and as the capital of
the state of Perak. The big question therefore is: when is it suitable for the TOD
concept to be applied in a specific area, especially in suburban areas? Hence, the
main objective for this paper is to assess the readiness of TOD concept
implementation for future development in Perak’s suburban areas.
LITERATURE REVIEW
TOD in Suburban Areas
Urbanization has produced many new townships or residential areas to
accommodate the needs and demands of urban workers. These new developments
are usually located at the end of the city boundary known as a suburb. These types
of developments are usually in high demand among urban workers because they
are suitable with their income. However, this situation results in a waste of
productive time for travelling and also causes air pollution. Besides that, the
optimum usage of transportation facilities only occurs at a certain time, usually
in the morning, which can be viewed as a waste because building these facilities
cost extremely large sums of money (Ahmad and Suratman, 2020). Hence, many
countries have taken steps to implement the concept of TOD in their development
planning, which can connect many areas using their transportation network and
public transport as their medium for travelling.
TOD is also related to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by the United
Nations, where this concept emphasizes the transportation sector as the basis for
a given area’s development, especially in the context of infrastructure, public
transport system, service delivery system, capability, and efficiency of
transportation (MacDonald et al., 2018). Sustainable transportation can also help
to achieve good economic integration, preservation and conservation of the
natural environment, increase social equity, health, urban resilience, urban and
rural connection, and rural productivity (Ramlan et al., 2021). To achieve better
TOD, there are four main principles for planning and development which can be
used in suburban areas, which are:
A considerable amount of research listed out different TOD indicators that can
be used to ensure uniformity of TOD in every area of each country. All these
indicators are based on four main principles of TOD, which are, transit system,
density, potential of land development, and economic development.
METHODOLOGY
In order to develop a TOD readiness model, a design and development research
(DDR) approach was chosen which focuses on 4 main elements and 20 indicators
of TOD (Mohd Ridhuan et al., 2014). DDR is a systematic process which is made
up of three main phases, which are phase of research, phase of design and
development, and phase of model implementation.
of TOD in the affected areas was explained to find out the current position of the
level of readiness of railway stations and local authorities in developing the
concept of TOD.
Figure 1: Existing Land Use within 800 Meter Radius from Railway Station
MDBG
MPKK
MDK
MDT
MPT
Element Indicator
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Population Density Population Density X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Potential of Land Mixed Land Use
X X X X √ X X X √ X √ √ X X
Development
Economic Level of Mixed Land Use
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Development
Transit System Number of Interchanges with
√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Different Modes
Transit System Accessibility to Station √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Transit System Connectivity with Other Routes √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Transit System Parking- Car √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Transit System Frequency of Transit System Service X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Economic Taxes Received by Local Authority
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Development
Transit System Parking- Bicycle X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Transit System Parking- Specific Group √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Economic Amount of Existing Businesses
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Development
Population Density Commercial Density X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Transit System Security √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Population Density Employment Density X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Economic Private Investment in Local
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Development Authority Jurisdiction
Transit System Peak-hour Passengers X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
Transit System Facilities √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Transit System Non-Peak Hour Passengers X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the developed model of TOD readiness was successfully
developed, which involves 20 indicators in four elements, where previous studies
had not considered implementing a study of the level of readiness of TOD,
especially in suburban areas. This model can serve as a tool to evaluate and
measure the level of readiness of a railway station and also local authorities in the
planning and development of the TOD concept, where it was proven to be
successful. This model may also be used as a proposed study in the development
of guidelines for TOD in the suburbs, especially for the Local Authorities which
have a TOD concept in their Local Development Plan.
In the context of Perak, all railway stations in Perak’s suburbs are not
ready to accept, implement, and adopt the concept of TOD in their areas. In order
to implement TOD in suburban areas in Perak, all the proposed indicators must
be prepared such as population density, potential of land development, economic
development, and transit system in these areas. However, the aspect of population
density is the most important element in implementing TOD because with high
demand, the TOD development will appear more effective.
REFERENCES
Ab Majid, R., Said, R., Abdullah, J., Ngah, R., & Kwong, Q. J. (2021). Factors
influencing ridership preference in using LRT service in Klang Valley, Malaysia.
PLANNING MALAYSIA, 19.
Abdullah, J., Rashid, K. A., Shah, M. I. B., Ling, O. H. L., Majid, R. A., & Ngah, R.
(2020). Land use development and ridership at Kelana Jaya lrt line, Malaysia.
Planning Malaysia, 18.
Agensi Pengangkutan Awam Darat Malaysia (APAD). (2016). Garis Panduan Polisi
untuk Pembangunan Berorientasikan Transit. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ahmad, M. S., & Suratman, R. (2020). Critical Review on Suburban Transit Orientation
Development. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 18.
Al-Harami, A. & Raffaello, F. (2019). Qatar National MUSEUM-Transit Oriented
Development: The Masterplan for the Urban Regeneration of a ‘Green TOD’.
Journal of Urban Management. Available online 25 September 2019.
Azmi, N. A., Osman, M. M., Rabe, N. S., Ramlan, N. H., Azizan, A., & Amiruddin, S.
(2021). A Comparative Analysis of Land Use and Compact City Principles and
Guidelines on Rail Public Transit Stations in Malaysia. PLANNING MALAYSIA,
19.
Cervero, R. (2020). The Transit Metropolis: A 21st Century Perspective. In
Transportation, Land Use, and Environmental Planning (pp. 131-149). Elsevier.
Furlan, R. & Saeed, M.A. (2019). Transit-Oriented Development in West Bay, Business
District of Doha, State of Qatar: A Strategy for Enhancing Liveability and Sense
of Place. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development
(2019).
Gomez, C.P., Omar, M. & Nallusamy, R. (2019). A Study on the Benefits of Transit
Oriented Development in Malaysia and Incoporation of Those Benefits in
Planning. MATEC Web of Conferences 266(1):06016.
Hassan, M. A., Hamdan, H., Abdullah, J., & Abdullah, Y. A. (2018). Housing and
Transport Expenditure: An Assessment of Location Housing Affordability.
PLANNING MALAYSIA, 16.
Hendrastuti, N. (2021). Gross Income Multiplier as A Fairness Indicator of Transaction
Value on Transfer of Rights on Land and Building in South Tangerang.
PLANNING MALAYSIA, 19.
Iseki, H. & Eom, H. (2019). Impacts of Rail Transit Accessibility on Firm Spatial
Distribution: Case Study in the Metropolitan Area of Washington, DC.
Transportation Research Record, 2673(11), 220–232.
Kaneko, Y., Nakagawa, T., Phun, V.K. & Kato, H. (2019). Impacts of Urban Railway
Investment on Regional Economies: Evidence from Tokyo using Spatial
Difference-in-Differences Analysis. Transportation Research Record, 2673(10),
129–140.
Ma, X., Chen, X., Li, X., Ding, C. & Wang, Y. (2018). Sustainable Station-Level
Planning: An Integrated Transport and Land Use Design Model for Transit-
Oriented Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1052-1063.
MacDonald A., Clarke A., Huang L., Roseland M. & Seitanidi M.M. (2018)
Multistakeholder Partnerships (SDG #17) as a Means of Achieving Sustainable
Communities and Cities (SDG #11). In: Leal Filho W. (eds) Handbook of
Sustainability Science and Research. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham.
Malaysian Industrial Development Finance (MIDF) (2017). The Future of Transit
Oriented Development. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Mohd Ridhuan, M.J., Shariza, S. & Mohd Ibrahim, K.A. (2014). Kompetensi Guru
Terhadap Pengurusan Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran: Suatu Pendekatan Teknik
Fuzzy Delphi. Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan (JuPiDi).1(3), 77-88.
PLANMalaysia (2016). Rancangan Fizikal Negara Ketiga (RFN3). Putrajaya, Malaysia.
PLANMalaysia (2018). Garis Panduan Perancangan Pembangunan Berorientasikan
Transit. Putrajaya, Malaysia.
PLANMalaysia@Perak (2020). Rancangan Struktur Negeri Perak 2040. Putrajaya,
Malaysia.
Ramlan, N. H., Osman, M. M., Rabe, N. S., Azizan, A., Azmi, N. A., & Amiruddin, S.
(2021). Assessing The Current Implementation of Compact and Mixed-Use
Development Within Public Rail Transit Stations in Malaysia. PLANNING
MALAYSIA, 19.
Renne, J. L. (2016). Transit Oriented Development: Making It Happen. Routledge
Rosni, N. A., Ponrahono, Z., & Noor, N. M. (2018). Segregated Land Use Sprawl: Tod
Approach for Mixeduse Housing Development in Kuala Lumpur. PLANNING
MALAYSIA, 16.
Samat, N., Mahamud, M. A., Rashid, S. M. R. A., Elhadary, Y., & Noor, N. M. (2019).
Urbanisation beyond its core boundary and its impact on the communities in
George Town conurbation, Malaysia. PLANNING MALAYSIA, 17.
Tahir, Z., & Malek, J. A. (2016). Main criteria in the development of smart cities
determined using analytical method. Planning Malaysia, 14.
Wang, X., Tong, D., Gao, J. & Chen, Y. (2019). The Reshaping of Land Development
Density through Rail Transit: The Stories of Central Areas vs. Suburbs in
Shenzhen, China. Cities, 89, 35-45.