Ranu Saha Plaint
Ranu Saha Plaint
Ranu Saha Plaint
AT SEALDAH
In the Matter of :-
RANU SAHA, wife of Manotosh Saha,
aged about 58 years, residing at 13A,
Haralal Das Street, Police Station
Entally, Kolkata – 700 014
………… PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
1. ANIRBAN SENGUPTA, son of Late
Dipak Sengupta residing at 11/A, Roy
Para Road, P. S. and P. O. – Sinthee,
Kolkata – 700 050
2. SINTHEE PEARA BAGAN CLUB, a
society registered under West Bengal
Societies Registration Act, 1961
bearing Registration No. SO185577
having its registered address at
Premises No. 107, South Sinthee
Road, Police Station – Sinthee, Post
Office – Ghugudanga, Kolkata – 700
030 represented by its
a. President, APURBA KAR, son of
Late Haripada Kar residing at 1/A,
Kedarnath Das Lane, Police Station
– Sinthee, Post Office –
Ghugudanga, Kolkata – 700 030
and
b. Secretary, DIPAK KUMAR DAS, son
of Late Debendra Nath Das,
residing at 118B, South Sinthee
Road, Police Station – Sinthee, Post
Office – Ghugudanga, Kolkata –
700 030
……… DEFENDANTS
premises no. 6H, Kedarnatha Das Lane (in the name of Amal
Kedarnath Das Lane (in the name of Ajoy Kumar Das having
chittack and 22 sq. ft. be the same a little more or less of danga
land lying and situated at Mouza – Sinthi No. 1 division and No.
Amal Kumar Das having Premises No. 6H, Kedarnath Das Lane
and by Ajoy Kumar Das having Premises No. 6K, Kedarnath Das
recorded in Book No. 1 Volume No. 27, Pages from 278 to 281
Das Lane.
4. That while said Amal Kumar Das and Ajoy Kumar Das, were in
Volume No. I, Pages from 287 to 297 being no. 3145 for the year
favour.
Book No. I, Volume No. 159, Pages from 155 to 159 being no.
9501 for the year 1975 and delivered possession of the suit
Dum Dum, recorded in Book No. I, Volume No. 10, Pages from
99 to 112 being no. 405 for the year 1995 and delivered
the name of Ajoy Kumar Das and Amal Kumar Das are still
been lost from his custody and to that effect the plaintiff have
the Plaintiff went to the Suit Property and saw that the
to enter into the suit property but with the strong resistance of
the plaintiff the defendant No. 1 failed to enter the suit property.
is doing the same on the suit property. Then the Defendant No.
Station on 07.08.2022.
Defendants.
6229 for the 2022 having the said entry the plaintiff have
obtained the certified copy of the said Deed and have found that
the cause title have transferred the suit property along with
aforesaid deed.
10. That being astonished with the said transfer the plaintiff have
further gone through the said deed and found that in page no. 4
Gift bearing no. 3130 for the year 1975 allegedly registered
before the office of the Sub – Registrar, Cossipore – Dum Dum,
North 24 Parganas and have got the report under the Seal and
01, pages from 274 to 280, for the year 1975 being no. 3130 on
28.09.2022.
unfortunately till this date Your Plaintiff have not received any
14. Thus, the defendant nos. 1 and 2 have never got any right title
D. S. R., Cossipore – Dum Dum and the said alleged deeds are
not acted upon and binding upon the present plaintiff and as
such the said deeds are liable to be declared null and void.
15. That as the defendant no. 1 in collusion with the defendant no.
40 sq. ft. in premises no. 6H, Kedarnatha Das Lane and Land
above mentioned illegal deeds the title of the plaintiff over the
the plaintiff have filed the instant suit praying for the decree of
that the alleged Deed of Gift dated 25.03.1975 being No. 3130
Dum Dum are void, illegal, neither acted upon nor binding
18. That the cause of action firstly arose on 04.08.2022 when the
plaintiff observed for the first time that the defendant no. 1 are
know about the alleged deed along with the Deed of Gift dated
of the S. R., Cossipore – Dum Dum and the next cause of action
arose on 28.09.2022 when the plaintiff have got the report from
availability of the alleged deed along with the Deed of Gift dated
of the S. R., Cossipore – Dum Dum and the last cause of action
relief/reliefs:
d. Costs;
equity or law.
SCHEDULE
All that piece and parcel of land measuring 01 cottah 11 chittack and
40 sq. ft. in premises no. 6H, Kedarnatha Das Lane (in the name of
Lane (in the name of Ajoy Kumar Das having Assessee No.
sq. ft. be the same a little more or less of danga land lying and
in the site plan attached with the present plaint, which is butted and
bounded as follows:
On the South – Plot No. 2 and 17 and 16 feet wide common passage
VERIF ICATION
paragraphs are true to best of my knowledge and belief and I sign this
premises.
Affidavit
as follows:-
Identified by me
Advocate
Firisti