Chapter 1 Modules 1 2
Chapter 1 Modules 1 2
Chapter 1 Modules 1 2
CURRICULUM ESSENTIALS
1. Basic Education
This level includes Kindergarten, Grade 1 to Grade 6 for elementary, and for
secondary, Grade 7 to Grade 10, for the Junior High School and Grade 11 and
12, and the Senior High School. Each of the levels has its specific recommended
curriculum. The new basic education levels are provided in the K to 12
Enhanced Curriculum of 2013 of the Department of Education.
3. Higher Education
It includes the Baccalaureate or Bachelor Degrees and the Graduate Degrees
(Masterate and Doctorate), which are under the Commission on Higher
Education (CHED) regulation.
Several curricula exist at different levels of schooling and various learning
environments. Let us find out how Allan Glatthorn (2000), as mentioned in Bilbao et
(2008), classified these:
Are you aware that there are several types of curricula in every classroom at the
same time? Let us study each one.
Now that you are fully aware that there are seven types of curricula operating
in every teacher's classroom, it is then very necessary to learn deeper and
broader about the role of the teacher concerning the school curriculum.
Are you aware that the teacher's role in school is very complex? Teachers do a
series of interrelated actions about curriculum, instruction, assessment, evaluation,
teaching, and learning. A classroom teacher is involved with the curriculum continuously
all day. However, very seldom has a teacher been described as a curricularist.
Curricularists in the past are referred only to as those who developed curriculum
theories. According to the study conducted by Sandra Hayes (1991), the most influential
curricularists in America include John Dewey, Ralph Tyler, Hilda Taba, and Franklin
Bobbit. You will learn more about them in the latter part of the module.
In this lesson, we will start using the word curricular to describe a curriculum
specialist professional (Hayes, 1991; Ornstein & Hunkins, 2004; Hewitt, 2006). A person
involved in curriculum knowing, writing, planning, implementing, evaluating, innovating,
and initiating may be designated as a curricularist. A TEACHER’S role is broader and
inclusive of other functions, so a teacher is curricular.
3. Plans the curriculum. A good curriculum has to be planned. It is the role of the
teacher to make a yearly, monthly, or daily plan of the curriculum. It serves as a
guide in the implementation of the curriculum. The teacher takes into
consideration several factors in planning a curriculum. These factors include
the learners, the support material, time, subject matter or content, the desired
outcomes, the context of the learners, among others. By doing this, the teacher
becomes a curriculum planner. (Planner)
7. Evaluate the curriculum. How can one determine if the desired learning
outcomes have been achieved? Is the curriculum working? Does it bring the
desired results? What do outcomes reveal? Are the learners achieving? Are
there some practices that should be modified? Should the curriculum be
modified, terminated, or continued? These are a few questions that need the
help of a curriculum evaluator. That person is the teacher. (Evaluator)
The seven different roles are those which a responsible teacher does in the
classroom every day! Doing this multi-faceted work qualifies a teacher to be curricular.
6. A plan that consists of learning opportunities for a specific time frame and place,
a tool that aims to bring about behavior changes in students as a result of
planned activities, and includes all learning experiences received by students
with the school's guidance (Goodland & Su, 1992).
7. As answers to three questions: 1. What knowledge, skills, and values are most
worthwhile? 2. Why are the most worthwhile? 3. How should the young acquire
them? (Cronbeth, 1992)
Some Points of View of Other Curricularists
Since a person's point of view shapes the concept and meaning of curriculum, this
has added to fragmentation and some confusion. However, when put together, the
different definitions from confusion. However, when put together, the different definitions
from diverse points of view would describe the curriculum as dynamic and perhaps
ever-changing.
The point of view about the curriculum can either be traditional or progressive
according to their philosophical, psychological, and even psychological orientations.
This view can also define what a curriculum is all about.
● Joseph Schwab thinks that the sole source of the curriculum is a discipline, thus
the subject areas such as Science, Mathematics, Social Studies, English, and
many more. In college, academic disciplines are labeled as humanities, sciences,
languages, and mathematics. He coined the word discipline as a ruling doctrine
for curriculum development.
From the traditional view of the theorists like Hutchins, Schwab, Bestor, and
Phenix, the curriculum can be defined as a field of study. The curriculum is highly
academic and is concerned with broad historical, philosophical, psychological, and
social issues. From a traditional view, the curriculum is mostly written documents such
as syllabus, course of study, books, and references where knowledge is found but is
used to accomplish intended goals.
Curriculum from Progressive Points of View
On the other hand, a listing of school subjects, syllabi, course of study, and a list
of specific disciplines do not make a curriculum. In its broadest terms, a progressive
view of the curriculum is the total learning experiences of the individual. Let us look into
how the curriculum is defined from a progressive point of view.
● Colin Marsh and George Willis also viewed curriculum as all the experiences in
the classroom which are planned and enacted by the teacher and learned by the
students.
The nature of the Curriculum has given rise to many interpretations, depending
on a person's philosophical beliefs. Let us put all of these interpretations in summary.
All curricula have content regardless of their design or models. The fund of
knowledge is the repository of accumulated discoveries and inventions of man from
the explorations of the earth and as a product of research. The curriculum is
anchored on a body of knowledge or discipline in most educational settings.
There are four ways of presenting the content in the curriculum. These are:
5. Feasibility- Can the subject content be learned within the time allowed, a
resource available, the expertise of the teachers, and the nature of the
learners? Are there contents of learning which can be learned beyond the
formal teaching-learning engagement? Are there opportunities provided to
learn these?
6. Interest - Will the learners take an interest in the content? Why? Are the
contents meaningful? What value will the contents have in the present and
future life of the learners? Interest is one of the driving forces for students to
learn better.
The selection of the subject matter or content, aside from the seven criteria
mentioned earlier, may include the following guidelines in selecting the CONTENT.
Guide in the Selection of the Content in the Curriculum
1. Content is commonly used in daily life.
2. Content is appropriate to the maturity levels and abilities of the learners
3. Content is valuable in meeting the needs and competencies of the future career.
4. Content is related to other fields or disciplines for complementation and
integration.
5. Content is important in the transfer of learning in other disciplines
Balance - Content should be fairly distributed in-depth and breadth. It will guarantee
that significant contents should be covered to avoid too much or too little of the contents
needed in the time allocation.
Scope – The breadth and depth of the curriculum content are vital in a curriculum.
The scope consists of all the contents, topics, learning experiences comprising the
curriculum. In layman's terms, scope refers to coverage. The scope shall consider the
cognitive level, affective domain, and psychomotor skills in identifying the contents.
Other factors will be considered, but caution is given to the overloading of contents.
"More content is not always better.”
2. Curriculum as a Process
We have seen that the curriculum can be approached as content. On the other
hand, it can also be approached as a process. Here, a curriculum is not seen as a
physical thing or a noun but as a verb or an action. It is the interaction among the
teachers, students, and content. As a process, curriculum happens in the classroom as
the question asked by the teacher and the learning activities engaged in by the
students. It is an active process emphasizing the context in which the processes occur.
Used in an analogy of the recipe in a cookbook, a recipe is content while cooking is the
process.
This section will not discuss the different teaching strategies from where learning
experiences are derived. Rather, it will describe how the process as a descriptor of the
curriculum is understood. The content is the substance of the curriculum; how the
contents will be communicated and learned will be addressed by the process.
To teachers, the process is very critical. The other side of the coin is instruction,
implementation, and teaching. These three words connote the process in the
curriculum. When do educators ask teachers: What curriculum are you using? Some of
the answers will be 1. Problem-based. 2. Hands-on, Mind On 3. Cooperative Learning
4. Blended Curriculum 5. On-line 6.Case-based and many more. These responses
approach curriculum as a Process. These are the ways of teaching, managing the
content, guiding learning, methods of teaching, and learning strategies of teaching or
delivery modes. In all of these, there are activities and actions that every teacher and
learner do together, or the teacher guides learners. Some strategies are time-tested
traditional methods, while others are emerging delivery modes.
The product from the curriculum is a student equipped with the knowledge, skills,
and values to function effectively and efficiently Approach. The real purpose of
education is to bring about significant changes in student's behavior patterns. Any
statement of objectives or intended outcomes of the school must be a statement of
changes in the students. Central to the approach is formulating behavioral objectives
stated as intended learning outcomes or desired products so that content and teaching
methods may be organized and the results evaluated. A product of learning is
operationalized as knowledge, skills, and values.
1. Curriculum planning considers the school's vision, mission, and goals. It also
includes the philosophy or strong education beliefs of the school. All of these will
eventually be translated to classroom desired learning outcomes for the
learners.
2. Curriculum designing is how the curriculum is conceptualized to include the
selection and organization of content, the selection and organization of learning
experiences or activities, and the selection of the assessment procedure and
tools to measure achieved learning outcomes. A curriculum design will also
include the resources to be utilized and the statement of the intended learning
outcomes.
All the models utilized the processes of (1) curriculum planning, (2)
curriculum designing, (3) curriculum implementing, and (4) curriculum
evaluating.
Foundations of Curriculum
1. Philosophical Foundations
Educators, teachers, educational planners, and policymakers must have a
philosophy or strong belief about education and schooling and the kind of
curriculum in the teachers' classrooms or learning environment. The philosophy of
the curriculum answers questions like What are Schools for? What subjects are
important? How should a student learn? What methods should be used? What
outcomes should be achieved? Why?
There are many philosophies in education but will only have a few to illustrate,
as presented by Ornstein and Hunkins in 2004.
A. Perennialism (Plato, Aristotle or Thomas Aquinas)
● Aim: To educate the rational person; cultivate intellect.
● Role: Teachers assist students to think with the reason (critical thinking:
HOTS)
● Focus: Classical subject, literary analysis. The curriculum is enduring.
● Trends: Use of great books (Bible, Koran, Classics) Liberal Arts
2. Historical Foundations
Where is curriculum development coming from? The historical foundations will
show us the chronological development along a timeline. Reading materials would
tell us that curriculum development started when Franklin Bobbit (1876-1956) wrote
"The Curriculum." Let us see how each one contributed to curriculum development
during their own time. Here are eight among the many we consider to have a great
contribution.
Persons Contribution
Persons Contribution
Persons Contribution
● Key to learning
● Key to learning
Persons/Symbols Contribution
● Gestalt Theory
- Learning is explained in terms of the "wholeness" of the
problem.
- Human beings do not respond to isolated stimuli but an
organization or pattern of stimuli.
● Key to learning
Gestalt - Learning is complex and abstract.
- Learners analyze the problem, discriminate between
essential and nonessential data, and perceive
relationships.
- Learners will perceive something about the whole what/how
they perceive is related to their previous experiences.
● Self-actualization Theory
● The classic theory of human needs.
● A child whose basic needs are not met will not be interested in
acquiring knowledge of the world.
● Put importance on human emotions based on love and trust.
Abraham
Maslow (1908- ● Key to learning
1970)
- Produce a healthy and happy learner who can accomplish,
grow and actualize his or her human self.
Persons/Symbols Contribution
Other Theorists
References:
Bilbao, P.B., Corpuz, B.B. & Dayagbil, F.T. (2020). The teacher and the school
curriculum. Lorimar Publishing, INC. QuezonCity, Metro Manila.
Bilbao, P.P., Dayagbil, F.T., & Corpuz, B.B. (2014). Curriculum development. Lorimar
Publishing, Inc. 776 Aurora Blvd., cor. Boston Street, Cubao, Quezon City,
Metro Manila