Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 84 views

    3

    Uploaded by

    Indu Murugan
    Sadanand Dhume's article provides a nuanced analysis of the complex issue of hijab bans in India by highlighting the differing motivations of Hindu nationalists and liberals in the west. While Hindu nationalists push for bans to advance their religious agenda, some liberals are concerned that hijabs place an undue burden of sexual morality on women. However, the author argues that hijab bans go against principles of religious freedom and individual choice by stripping women's autonomy over their own bodies and religious expression. Bans perpetuate the idea that women's bodies are subject to state control rather than their own private domain. Ultimately, the hijab is a meaningful religious and cultural symbol for many women, and bans limit freedom by denying

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    3

    Uploaded by

    Indu Murugan
    84 views2 pages
    Sadanand Dhume's article provides a nuanced analysis of the complex issue of hijab bans in India by highlighting the differing motivations of Hindu nationalists and liberals in the west. While Hindu nationalists push for bans to advance their religious agenda, some liberals are concerned that hijabs place an undue burden of sexual morality on women. However, the author argues that hijab bans go against principles of religious freedom and individual choice by stripping women's autonomy over their own bodies and religious expression. Bans perpetuate the idea that women's bodies are subject to state control rather than their own private domain. Ultimately, the hijab is a meaningful religious and cultural symbol for many women, and bans limit freedom by denying

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Sadanand Dhume's article provides a nuanced analysis of the complex issue of hijab bans in India by highlighting the differing motivations of Hindu nationalists and liberals in the west. While Hindu nationalists push for bans to advance their religious agenda, some liberals are concerned that hijabs place an undue burden of sexual morality on women. However, the author argues that hijab bans go against principles of religious freedom and individual choice by stripping women's autonomy over their own bodies and religious expression. Bans perpetuate the idea that women's bodies are subject to state control rather than their own private domain. Ultimately, the hijab is a meaningful religious and cultural symbol for many women, and bans limit freedom by denying

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    84 views2 pages

    3

    Uploaded by

    Indu Murugan
    Sadanand Dhume's article provides a nuanced analysis of the complex issue of hijab bans in India by highlighting the differing motivations of Hindu nationalists and liberals in the west. While Hindu nationalists push for bans to advance their religious agenda, some liberals are concerned that hijabs place an undue burden of sexual morality on women. However, the author argues that hijab bans go against principles of religious freedom and individual choice by stripping women's autonomy over their own bodies and religious expression. Bans perpetuate the idea that women's bodies are subject to state control rather than their own private domain. Ultimately, the hijab is a meaningful religious and cultural symbol for many women, and bans limit freedom by denying

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    In his article, "India's Hijab Debate Is Both Nuanced and Nasty" (February 17, 2022), Sadanand

    Dhume expertly navigates the complexities surrounding the contentious issue of hijab bans,

    illuminating the dichotomy between the motivations driving Hindu Nationalists and liberals in

    the West. He astutely points out, through using evidence and analysis to support his arguments

    and preserving a neutral bias, that while the former are driven by purely religious fervor, the

    latter are concerned with the problematic cultural notion that the hijab places an undue burden of

    sexual morality solely on women, rather than on men. Dhume hopes to contribute to the ongoing

    discourse surrounding hijab bans, by highlighting the complex cultural, religious, and political

    implications associated with it; he wants to make it clear that this issue is not a simple

    black-or-white conversation. He adopts a neutral, objective, and analytical tone in this article,

    presenting the complex issue of hijab bans in India with a balanced and scholarly perspective

    while avoiding taking sides. He writes this piece to ease informed and discerning readers

    interested in the conversation around hijab bans with a nuanced analysis of the complex issue of

    hijab bans in, not only India, but the world as a whole.

    While Dhume recognizes the motivations behind both sides of the debate, I personally believe

    that hijab bans go against the principles of religious freedom and individual choice. As Dhume

    mentions, some Hindu Nationalists push for hijab bans as a means of advancing their religious

    agenda. This desire to advance their religious agenda is not based on genuine concerns for the

    well-being of women and is harmful because it strips women of their freedom of expression,

    perpetuating the notion that their bodies are public property to be regulated by the state, ignoring

    their agency and the cultural and religious significance of the hijab for many. Furthermore,

    Dhume notes that some liberals in the West promote hijab bans because of the belief that it
    places the burden of sexual morality on women rather than men. However, I argue that this view

    is also misguided and overlooks the agency of women to make their own choices about what

    they wear. The ban on hijab reinforces the idea that women's bodies are subject to control by the

    state, rather than being treated as their own private property. Rather than advancing secularism

    and gender equality, such bans limit the freedom and independence of women, as pointed out by

    Dhume. The hijab is a deeply personal and meaningful symbol for many women, and to ban it is

    to strip them of their right to express their religious and cultural beliefs. As Dhume points out,

    the issue of hijab bans is multi-faceted and complex, but I firmly believe that the principles of

    religious freedom and individual choice must be upheld. In conclusion, I believe that we should

    respect the cultural and religious beliefs of women, and allow them to make their own choices

    about what they wear. The hijab is not a tool for oppression, but a symbol of empowerment for

    many women, and it should be protected as such.

    You might also like