Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 39 views

    GIP Part 3 New

    Uploaded by

    devendri sarathchandra
    The document contains questions and answers related to project management processes and artifacts. Some key points: - The most effective method for dealing with language constraints during requirements gathering for a project in Japan is to use use case diagramming. - Artifacts marked as "living" will be updated throughout the project lifecycle. - The primary benefit of a DAR (Decision Analysis Report) process is that it provides an objective framework for option analysis and removes bias.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    GIP Part 3 New

    Uploaded by

    devendri sarathchandra
    39 views4 pages
    The document contains questions and answers related to project management processes and artifacts. Some key points: - The most effective method for dealing with language constraints during requirements gathering for a project in Japan is to use use case diagramming. - Artifacts marked as "living" will be updated throughout the project lifecycle. - The primary benefit of a DAR (Decision Analysis Report) process is that it provides an objective framework for option analysis and removes bias.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document contains questions and answers related to project management processes and artifacts. Some key points: - The most effective method for dealing with language constraints during requirements gathering for a project in Japan is to use use case diagramming. - Artifacts marked as "living" will be updated throughout the project lifecycle. - The primary benefit of a DAR (Decision Analysis Report) process is that it provides an objective framework for option analysis and removes bias.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    39 views4 pages

    GIP Part 3 New

    Uploaded by

    devendri sarathchandra
    The document contains questions and answers related to project management processes and artifacts. Some key points: - The most effective method for dealing with language constraints during requirements gathering for a project in Japan is to use use case diagramming. - Artifacts marked as "living" will be updated throughout the project lifecycle. - The primary benefit of a DAR (Decision Analysis Report) process is that it provides an objective framework for option analysis and removes bias.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    9.

    What is of LEAST importance as an input to process improvement initiatives

    Team Score Card (*)

    10. Where can one find the information with regards to Testing Standards and Defect Management
    guidelines?

    Project Engineering Guidelines (*)

    11. Which among the list below is the PRIMARY source of the project goals in the Metrics Selection
    Tool?

    Process Performance Baseline (PPB) (*)

    12. According to GIP, "Remark" is a status assigned to the QA Test Defect when

    The defect is raised by the QA Test team (*)

    The defect is rejected as "not reproducible" by the Development team

    13. What does the term "Living" indicate when it is associated with an Artifact?

    Artifact that is going to be updated throughout the project lifecycle (*)

    14. Identify the PRIMARY benefit of a DAR process

    Provides a framework for option analysis and removes bias (*)

    15. Sudha is to lead a project for a client in Japan. Language constraint is identified as a key challenge
    in the requirement gathering phase. What is the MOST effective method to be adopted

    Usage of "Use Case Diagramming Method (*)

    1. Identify the activity that will NOT lead to a change request

    None of the Options (*)

    2. What is the purpose of Refactoring the code

    All the options (*)

    3. What is the applicability of the program management discipline

    All the options (*)


    1. Sudha is to lead a project for a client in Japan. Language constraint is identified as a
    key challenge in the requirement gathering phase. What is the MOST effective
    method to be adopted?

    Usage of "Use Case Diagramming Method"

    2. “Defect to Remark Ratio" metric is a DIRECT indicator of

    Efficiency of the QA Test Team

    3. Review plan is placed in


    PAD

    4. "Perform Architectural Analysis and Design" is NOT required for

    Systems with existing well-defined architecture

    5. Who should approve the Project Approach Note

    Delivery Head, as he is the management representative

    6. Identify what is NOT an appropriate status during change approval?

    Hold

    7. What is incorrect about Contract Compliance Checklist

    It is prepared by Project Manager

    8. Contract compliance conducted by

    Account owner

    9. Where is the reuse area(s) identified for a project

    Project Approach Document

    10. As per the PTR template in GIP, what are the Mandatory activity for a maintenance project

    Project Effort Estimate


    11. Risk tracking during project execution is done using

    Project risk list


    12. What is the primary intent of an architectural POC
    Prove feasibility of the system to architecturally significant requirements

    13. What is normally NOT included in a deployment package


    Review Reports

    14. During Detailed Design how does one address non functional requirements

    By mapping Design elements to State Chart Diagram

    15. Identify what will NOT influence the Quality Plan for a project?

    Feed from other Quality Partners

    16. What is normally NOT discussed in an Account Business Review

    SARB Comments

    17. What is the PRIMARY intent of bi-directional traceability

    To identify all requirements are translated into implementation, to verify all features
    implemented can be traced to an approved source and traceability between requirements is
    maintained for ensuring integrity

    18. The assertion that is true in its completeness with respect to work product audit is

    Review of artifacts by the process consultant is considered as work product review

    19. Identify what is NOT an input for "Planning the Integration

    Developer Release Notes

    20. Who is authorized to "Close" an implemented CR

    Member of the CCB

    21. Identify the activity FIRST leads to the creation of Scope-Traceability Matrix

    Manage Requirements

    22. What is the src of CI for Performing Product Audit


    Found in Configuration Project Repository
    23. The status "living" is assigned to a document. what does it mean

    document that is changed through out the life cycle

    24. As per the PTR template in GIP, what are the Mandatory activity for a maintenance project?

    None of the options

    25. What is NOT a key criterion for evaluating adequacy of a requirement statement

    Simple

    26. What is not relevant to PM Activities

    Account delivery report

    27. A project manager decides to identify and map dependent requirements. Which artifact would be an output
    of this?
    Scope and Traceability Matrix
    28. Sumathy is the Quality Partner for a Project. What is Smithy’s role in developing the PTR for the project?
    Review PTR

    29. Due to time constraint the team has only limited time to close comments arising out of the work product
    audit. What should be the BEST consideration to identify the subset of comments for closure?
    All comments whose impact on non-implementation is high needs to be closed

    You might also like